New York University Applications and Decisions
Below is a list of applicants who have demonstrated interest in New York University. Our best formula
for this college is based on
426 members who were accepted or rejected. The formula
has a college admissions prediction accuracy of
83%?.
Because not all members have filled out the most recent version of our survey, some predictions are made based on
less-accurate models. Those are noted with an asterisk (*) next to their prediction.
This is a very popular school, and you're looking at the whole list. If you
would like to only see completed applications,
click here for a smaller version of this page.
|
| 2010 | (Private) | 2200 | 3.93 | Top 3% | South Asian | 62.6% |
| 2010 | NJ | 2180 | 3.95 | Top 5% | None Indicated | 93.1%* |
| 2010 | AL | 2040 | 3.42 | Class Not Ranked | African-American | 44.0% |
| 2010 | NJ | 1940 | 3.59 | Top 35% | Caucasian | 33.0%* |
| 2010 | OH | 1810 | 3.70 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 61.9%* |
| 2010 | NJ | 1810 | 3.70 | Top 15% | African-American | 25.9% |
| 2010 | CT | 1640 | 3.09 | Bottom 40% | Native American | 3.8%* |
| 2010 | NY | 1620 | 3.70 | Top 1% | Hispanic | 7.0% |
| 2009 | MA | 2390 | 3.62 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 77.5% |
| 2009 | VA | 2340 | 3.74 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 98.0% |
| 2009 | NJ | 2240 | 3.73 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 94.9% |
| 2009 | GA | 2240 | 3.72 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 91.9% |
| 2009 | CA | 2190 | 3.60 | Top 10% | East Asian | 97.0% |
| 2009 | PA | 2160 | 3.80 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 87.1%* |
| 2009 | MA | 2130 | 3.44 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 84.9% |
| 2009 | MD | 2120 | 3.64 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 71.0% |
| 2009 | GA | 2110 | 3.75 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 65.5% |
| 2009 | VA | 2090 | 3.98 | Top 1% | Caucasian | 39.6% |
| 2009 | (Private) | 2090 | 3.70 | Class Not Ranked | East Asian | 84.2% |
| 2009 | PA | 2090 | 4.00 | Top 10% | East Asian | 66.0% |
| 2009 | NY | 2070 | 3.80 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 86.1% |
| 2009 | MI | 2060 | 3.61 | Class Not Ranked | South Asian | 82.5% |
| 2009 | XX | 1980 | 3.80 | Top 10% | South Asian | 80.6% |
| 2009 | NJ | 1980 | 3.50 | Unknown | South Asian | 48.0%* |
| 2009 | XX | 1960 | 3.45 | Top 30% | East Asian | 46.7% |
| 2009 | PA | 1960 | 3.63 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 73.9% |
| 2009 | MA | 1930 | 3.61 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 12.0% |
| 2009 | NY | 1920 | 3.50 | Class Not Ranked | South Asian | 10.6% |
| 2009 | CA | 1880 | 3.40 | Class Not Ranked | None Indicated | 48.8% |
| 2009 | FL | 1870 | 3.75 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 72.2% |
| 2009 | NJ | 1840 | 3.50 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 99.9%* |
| 2009 | LA | 31 | 3.80 | Top 5% | Hispanic | 69.4% |
| 2008 | MD | 2340 | 3.63 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 96.8% |
| 2008 | CO | 2180 | 3.98 | Top 1% | None Indicated | 92.7% |
| 2008 | VA | 2160 | 3.60 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 73.3%* |
| 2008 | GA | 2140 | 3.80 | Bottom 50% | Caucasian | 61.1%* |
| 2008 | CT | 2090 | 3.88 | Unknown | South Asian | 83.0%* |
| 2008 | NJ | 2030 | 3.70 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 64.3%* |
| 2008 | FL | 2020 | 3.93 | Unknown | Hispanic | 93.3% |
| 2008 | VA | 1910 | 3.30 | Unknown | Caucasian | 33.1% |
| 2008 | XX | 1860 | 3.00 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 9.1%* |
| 2008 | FL | 1840 | 3.57 | Unknown | Hispanic | 66.5%* |
| 2008 | CA | 1590 | 3.75 | Unknown | East Asian | 18.2%* |
| 2007 | NJ | 2250 | 3.80 | Top 5% | East Asian | 92.8%* |
| 2003 | WI | 2280 | 3.60 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 86.2%* |
|
| 2011 | NY | 2000 | 3.68 | Top 25% | South Asian | 79.3% |
| 2011 | PA | 1930 | 3.50 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 33.2% |
| 2010 | PA | 2380 | 4.00 | Valedictorian | East Asian | 98.4% |
| 2010 | IL | 2220 | 3.83 | Top 2% | South Asian | 96.1% |
| 2010 | FL | 2210 | 4.00 | Valedictorian | East Asian | 94.3% |
| 2010 | NC | 2180 | 4.00 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 94.9% |
| 2010 | NY | 2180 | 3.90 | Top 3% | Hispanic | 100.0% |
| 2010 | PA | 2150 | 3.70 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 94.0% |
| 2010 | CA | 2110 | 3.46 | Unknown | Caucasian | 86.0% |
| 2010 | CA | 2100 | 3.50 | Unknown | Middle-Eastern | 86.2% |
| 2010 | NY | 2090 | 3.84 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 46.2% |
| 2010 | TX | 2080 | 3.70 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 78.5% |
| 2010 | CA | 2050 | 3.72 | Top 3% | Hispanic | 95.5% |
| 2010 | ME | 2040 | 3.80 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 100.0% |
| 2010 | NC | 2030 | 3.90 | Top 3% | Caucasian | 75.4% |
| 2010 | CA | 2030 | 3.77 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 75.4%* |
| 2010 | FL | 2020 | 3.50 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 52.4% |
| 2010 | NY | 1990 | 3.75 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 67.8% |
| 2010 | MD | 1960 | 3.60 | Top 15% | Caucasian | 61.0% |
| 2010 | RI | 1960 | 3.40 | Class Not Ranked | None Indicated | 38.4%* |
| 2010 | MA | 1950 | 3.75 | Top 10% | None Indicated | 67.7% |
| 2010 | MA | 1950 | 3.89 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 73.4%* |
| 2010 | CA | 1940 | 3.56 | Top 5% | Middle-Eastern | 68.4% |
| 2010 | XX | 1930 | 3.66 | Top 5% | East Asian | 50.7% |
| 2010 | XX | 1900 | 3.50 | Unknown | South Asian | 44.0% |
| 2010 | FL | 1890 | 3.75 | Top 1% | Hispanic | 88.8% |
| 2010 | TX | 1870 | 3.96 | Valedictorian | African-American | 86.1% |
| 2010 | XX | 1840 | 3.40 | Top 40% | East Asian | 10.6% |
| 2010 | NY | 1830 | 3.64 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 65.5%* |
| 2010 | NJ | 1770 | 4.00 | Top 2% | Hispanic | 76.7% |
| 2010 | MD | 31 | 3.40 | Unknown | Caucasian | 53.3%* |
| 2010 | CA | 31 | 3.68 | Top 10% | Middle-Eastern | 81.8% |
| 2010 | IL | 31 | 4.00 | Valedictorian | Hispanic | 96.5% |
| 2010 | TX | 27 | 3.20 | Bottom 40% | Hispanic | 22.1% |
| 2009 | FL | 2400 | 4.00 | Valedictorian | Caucasian | 100.0% |
| 2009 | PA | 2390 | 4.00 | Salutatorian | East Asian | 98.6% |
| 2009 | MN | 2360 | 3.86 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 98.3% |
| 2009 | NJ | 2350 | 3.90 | Class Not Ranked | None Indicated | 96.2% |
| 2009 | CA | 2350 | 3.92 | Top 5% | None Indicated | 99.2% |
| 2009 | TX | 2350 | 4.00 | Top 1% | East Asian | 99.0% |
| 2009 | CA | 2350 | 4.00 | Top 1% | None Indicated | 99.3% |
| 2009 | (Private) | 2350 | 3.80 | Class Not Ranked | East Asian | 95.2% |
| 2009 | PA | 2350 | 3.80 | Top 10% | Other | 100.0% |
| 2009 | (Private) | 2340 | 4.00 | Top 1% | None Indicated | 98.0% |
| 2009 | TX | 2330 | 3.93 | Top 5% | East Asian | 98.4% |
| 2009 | RI | 2330 | 3.95 | Top 5% | East Asian | 98.6% |
| 2009 | MA | 2330 | 3.88 | Top 1% | Caucasian | 98.7% |
| 2009 | NY | 2310 | 3.99 | Valedictorian | East Asian | 98.5% |
| 2009 | NJ | 2310 | 3.70 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 100.0% |
| 2009 | (Private) | 2300 | 4.00 | Top 10% | East Asian | 98.2% |
| 2009 | KY | 2300 | 3.66 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 97.2% |
| 2009 | NJ | 2300 | 3.90 | Class Not Ranked | East Asian | 98.2% |
| 2009 | NY | 2290 | 3.64 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 96.2% |
| 2009 | NY | 2290 | 3.76 | Class Not Ranked | East Asian | 96.6% |
| 2009 | NY | 2280 | 4.00 | Unknown | East Asian | 95.0% |
| 2009 | SC | 2280 | 4.00 | Top 1% | Caucasian | 98.0% |
| 2009 | OH | 2280 | 3.60 | Top 20% | African-American | 97.9% |
| 2009 | CA | 2270 | 3.89 | Top 1% | East Asian | 98.0% |
| 2009 | (Private) | 2270 | 3.88 | Class Not Ranked | Hispanic | 99.2% |
| 2009 | MA | 2260 | 3.60 | Unknown | Hispanic | 97.5% |
| 2009 | OR | 2260 | 4.00 | Valedictorian | Other | 96.1% |
| 2009 | CA | 2250 | 3.94 | Class Not Ranked | South Asian | 97.8% |
| 2009 | (Private) | 2250 | 3.94 | Salutatorian | East Asian | 96.1%* |
| 2009 | NY | 2250 | 3.95 | Top 5% | African-American | 85.6% |
| 2009 | WA | 2250 | 3.70 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 100.0% |
| 2009 | CA | 2250 | 3.65 | Top 10% | Other | 94.0% |
| 2009 | NY | 2250 | 3.80 | Class Not Ranked | South Asian | 91.6% |
| 2009 | NY | 2240 | 3.50 | Class Not Ranked | East Asian | 95.0% |
| 2009 | CA | 2240 | 3.60 | Top 10% | East Asian | 96.2% |
| 2009 | CA | 2230 | 3.90 | Top 5% | East Asian | 97.5% |
| 2009 | PA | 2230 | 3.75 | Top 10% | South Asian | 94.2% |
| 2009 | NY | 2230 | 3.80 | Unknown | Caucasian | 100.0%* |
| 2009 | NJ | 2230 | 3.93 | Class Not Ranked | South Asian | 92.3% |
| 2009 | NY | 2230 | 3.90 | Valedictorian | None Indicated | 97.1% |
| 2009 | NJ | 2220 | 3.84 | Class Not Ranked | South Asian | 93.9% |
| 2009 | MD | 2220 | 3.75 | Top 5% | None Indicated | 95.4% |
| 2009 | CA | 2220 | 3.73 | Top 20% | East Asian | 87.7% |
| 2009 | PA | 2220 | 3.72 | Top 10% | South Asian | 90.3% |
| 2009 | TX | 2210 | 3.71 | Top 20% | South Asian | 89.3% |
| 2009 | FL | 2210 | 3.70 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 95.9% |
| 2009 | CA | 2210 | 3.78 | Top 4% | East Asian | 95.5% |
| 2009 | (Private) | 2210 | 4.00 | Salutatorian | Caucasian | 97.2% |
| 2009 | VA | 2210 | 3.53 | Class Not Ranked | Hispanic | 96.2% |
| 2009 | IL | 2200 | 3.97 | Top 1% | Caucasian | 97.5% |
| 2009 | NJ | 2200 | 3.64 | Top 10% | East Asian | 90.0% |
| 2009 | CA | 2200 | 3.88 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 94.8% |
| 2009 | XX | 2200 | 3.87 | Top 20% | East Asian | 93.5% |
| 2009 | PA | 2200 | 3.85 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 89.5% |
| 2009 | CO | 2190 | 3.75 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 89.1% |
| 2009 | NJ | 2190 | 3.87 | Top 10% | None Indicated | 93.6% |
| 2009 | NJ | 2190 | 3.60 | Class Not Ranked | None Indicated | 100.0% |
| 2009 | CA | 2190 | 3.76 | Class Not Ranked | East Asian | 86.5% |
| 2009 | WA | 2180 | 4.00 | Top 1% | East Asian | 92.2% |
| 2009 | FL | 2180 | 3.95 | Top 10% | None Indicated | 94.8% |
| 2009 | FL | 2180 | 3.92 | Top 5% | South Asian | 95.5% |
| 2009 | CA | 2170 | 3.49 | Top 35% | None Indicated | 78.5% |
| 2009 | NJ | 2170 | 3.73 | Class Not Ranked | East Asian | 82.0% |
| 2009 | PA | 2170 | 3.80 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 94.0% |
| 2009 | MA | 2150 | 3.90 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 96.5% |
| 2009 | XX | 2150 | 3.70 | Top 1% | East Asian | 89.3% |
| 2009 | NY | 2150 | 3.80 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 100.0% |
| 2009 | NH | 2150 | 3.83 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 92.4% |
| 2009 | NJ | 2140 | 3.85 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 90.5% |
| 2009 | VA | 2140 | 4.00 | Valedictorian | East Asian | 97.1% |
| 2009 | CT | 2140 | 3.81 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 90.6% |
| 2009 | CT | 2140 | 3.83 | Top 1% | African-American | 97.1% |
| 2009 | WI | 2130 | 4.00 | Top 1% | East Asian | 96.8% |
| 2009 | NJ | 2130 | 4.00 | Top 10% | South Asian | 92.7% |
| 2009 | NV | 2130 | 3.70 | Top 1% | Caucasian | 86.4% |
| 2009 | PA | 2130 | 3.86 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 90.1% |
| 2009 | TX | 2130 | 3.73 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 76.2% |
| 2009 | PA | 2130 | 3.70 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 75.7% |
| 2009 | MD | 2130 | 3.96 | Top 5% | East Asian | 94.1% |
| 2009 | (Private) | 2120 | 3.76 | Top 5% | South Asian | 98.1% |
| 2009 | PA | 2120 | 3.46 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 100.0% |
| 2009 | NY | 2120 | 4.00 | Valedictorian | South Asian | 95.9% |
| 2009 | FL | 2120 | 3.80 | Top 1% | East Asian | 94.4% |
| 2009 | AZ | 2120 | 3.89 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 86.4% |
| 2009 | CA | 2120 | 3.86 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 91.4% |
| 2009 | CA | 2120 | 3.77 | Class Not Ranked | Other | 79.5% |
| 2009 | NY | 2110 | 3.70 | Class Not Ranked | East Asian | 72.3% |
| 2009 | CA | 2110 | 4.00 | Valedictorian | South Asian | 92.6%* |
| 2009 | FL | 2110 | 3.79 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 82.6% |
| 2009 | NJ | 2110 | 4.00 | Valedictorian | Caucasian | 96.3% |
| 2009 | (Private) | 2110 | 3.80 | Class Not Ranked | African-American | 96.9% |
| 2009 | NY | 2110 | 3.70 | Top 5% | Hispanic | 95.3% |
| 2009 | FL | 2100 | 3.90 | Top 5% | Hispanic | 93.9% |
| 2009 | XX | 2100 | 3.75 | Top 1% | South Asian | 90.5% |
| 2009 | VA | 2100 | 4.00 | Valedictorian | Middle-Eastern | 94.7% |
| 2009 | NJ | 2100 | 3.61 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 62.1% |
| 2009 | CT | 2090 | 3.94 | Top 5% | Hispanic | 97.9% |
| 2009 | WI | 2090 | 3.90 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 89.8% |
| 2009 | CA | 2090 | 3.85 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 89.3% |
| 2009 | VA | 2090 | 3.96 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 100.0% |
| 2009 | DC | 2090 | 3.89 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 88.0% |
| 2009 | CA | 2090 | 3.59 | Class Not Ranked | Hispanic | 90.8% |
| 2009 | NJ | 2090 | 3.46 | Class Not Ranked | South Asian | 77.6% |
| 2009 | IN | 2080 | 3.86 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 90.7% |
| 2009 | IN | 2070 | 4.00 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 92.2% |
| 2009 | (Private) | 2070 | 3.70 | Top 5% | South Asian | 74.4% |
| 2009 | PA | 2070 | 4.00 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 81.3% |
| 2009 | FL | 2070 | 4.00 | Top 1% | Caucasian | 85.3% |
| 2009 | CA | 2070 | 3.87 | Top 10% | East Asian | 90.4% |
| 2009 | NY | 2070 | 3.85 | Top 20% | East Asian | 79.0% |
| 2009 | NY | 2060 | 3.70 | Class Not Ranked | South Asian | 71.5%* |
| 2009 | NJ | 2060 | 3.80 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 78.5% |
| 2009 | IL | 2050 | 3.70 | Top 10% | Other | 92.3% |
| 2009 | NY | 2050 | 3.84 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 81.8% |
| 2009 | (Private) | 2050 | 3.86 | Top 5% | East Asian | 85.6% |
| 2009 | NJ | 2050 | 3.60 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 72.3% |
| 2009 | (Private) | 2050 | 4.00 | Top 5% | East Asian | 94.1% |
| 2009 | PA | 2040 | 3.95 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 93.0% |
| 2009 | NJ | 2040 | 3.70 | Top 10% | African-American | 100.0% |
| 2009 | CA | 2040 | 3.69 | Unknown | Caucasian | 71.0% |
| 2009 | FL | 2030 | 3.92 | Top 1% | Hispanic | 96.2% |
| 2009 | TX | 2030 | 3.50 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 50.8%* |
| 2009 | (Private) | 2030 | 3.65 | Top 5% | Hispanic | 91.7% |
| 2009 | IN | 2020 | 3.80 | Top 10% | South Asian | 86.3% |
| 2009 | XX | 2020 | 3.60 | Top 20% | South Asian | 52.8% |
| 2009 | CA | 2010 | 3.50 | Class Not Ranked | African-American | 86.4% |
| 2009 | NY | 2010 | 3.75 | Top 1% | Hispanic | 93.8% |
| 2009 | NY | 2010 | 3.80 | Top 10% | Hispanic | 84.8% |
| 2009 | CA | 2000 | 3.71 | Top 1% | East Asian | 88.6% |
| 2009 | CA | 2000 | 3.90 | Top 10% | Middle-Eastern | 70.1% |
| 2009 | XX | 2000 | 3.60 | Top 20% | South Asian | 45.7% |
| 2009 | NY | 2000 | 3.50 | Top 20% | Hispanic | 89.8% |
| 2009 | NY | 2000 | 3.86 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 100.0% |
| 2009 | GA | 2000 | 3.51 | Top 20% | South Asian | 59.4% |
| 2009 | CA | 2000 | 3.88 | Top 1% | East Asian | 85.3% |
| 2009 | CT | 2000 | 3.60 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 55.0% |
| 2009 | WA | 1990 | 4.00 | Valedictorian | Hispanic | 89.3% |
| 2009 | PA | 1980 | 3.81 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 71.2% |
| 2009 | TX | 1960 | 3.90 | Top 10% | African-American | 89.5% |
| 2009 | TX | 1960 | 3.90 | Top 10% | Hispanic | 95.3% |
| 2009 | NY | 1950 | 3.84 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 85.3% |
| 2009 | TX | 1950 | 3.98 | Top 20% | East Asian | 72.8% |
| 2009 | CA | 1950 | 3.55 | Class Not Ranked | Hispanic | 84.1% |
| 2009 | OH | 1930 | 3.70 | Class Not Ranked | South Asian | 45.9% |
| 2009 | NY | 1920 | 4.00 | Top 10% | Hispanic | 93.8% |
| 2009 | FL | 1920 | 3.48 | Top 20% | Hispanic | 78.9% |
| 2009 | NY | 1920 | 3.80 | Unknown | East Asian | 55.2% |
| 2009 | CA | 1910 | 3.40 | Top 30% | African-American | 63.0% |
| 2009 | TX | 1900 | 3.60 | Top 20% | Hispanic | 85.3% |
| 2009 | MA | 1900 | 3.40 | Top 10% | African-American | 66.9%* |
| 2009 | (Private) | 1890 | 4.00 | Top 10% | Middle-Eastern | 69.9% |
| 2009 | NJ | 1880 | 3.70 | Top 40% | Caucasian | 99.9%* |
| 2009 | FL | 1870 | 4.00 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 54.5% |
| 2009 | NY | 1870 | 3.70 | Top 5% | Hispanic | 73.7% |
| 2009 | CA | 1860 | 3.60 | Top 20% | Hispanic | 65.2% |
| 2009 | NH | 1830 | 3.00 | Top 10% | East Asian | 23.1% |
| 2009 | FL | 1780 | 3.35 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 50.2% |
| 2009 | OH | 1770 | 3.61 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 33.3% |
| 2009 | XX | 1750 | 3.81 | Class Not Ranked | East Asian | 27.2% |
| 2009 | FL | 1740 | 3.72 | Top 10% | Hispanic | 62.5% |
| 2009 | NY | 1510 | 3.67 | Top 10% | South Asian | 100.0% |
| 2009 | LA | 1410 | 3.85 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 87.7%* |
| 2009 | NY | 1080 | 3.90 | Top 1% | Hispanic | 70.0% |
| 2009 | IL | 34 | 3.62 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 88.7% |
| 2009 | CA | 34 | 3.96 | Top 5% | Other | 94.8% |
| 2009 | XX | 33 | 3.60 | Class Not Ranked | Hispanic | 97.8% |
| 2009 | PA | 33 | 3.96 | Class Not Ranked | None Indicated | 94.6% |
| 2009 | CA | 33 | 4.00 | Valedictorian | Caucasian | 94.5% |
| 2009 | IL | 31 | 4.00 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 88.3% |
| 2009 | MI | 29 | 3.50 | Top 30% | South Asian | 32.2%* |
| 2009 | MI | 27 | 3.72 | Unknown | Caucasian | 43.1%* |
| 2009 | CA | 27 | 4.00 | Valedictorian | None Indicated | 71.3% |
| 2009 | CT | 24 | 4.00 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 48.6%* |
| 2008 | (Private) | 2400 | 4.00 | Class Not Ranked | East Asian | 97.4% |
| 2008 | CA | 2370 | 4.00 | Top 1% | South Asian | 99.2% |
| 2008 | NJ | 2350 | 4.00 | Valedictorian | East Asian | 99.0% |
| 2008 | CA | 2340 | 4.00 | Unknown | Other | 98.2% |
| 2008 | XX | 2330 | 4.00 | Top 5% | East Asian | 98.8% |
| 2008 | OH | 2320 | 4.00 | Top 1% | South Asian | 98.8% |
| 2008 | CA | 2320 | 3.81 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 98.5% |
| 2008 | CT | 2320 | 3.54 | Top 20% | East Asian | 93.7% |
| 2008 | MA | 2320 | 4.00 | Valedictorian | Caucasian | 97.5%* |
| 2008 | CA | 2310 | 3.86 | Top 5% | East Asian | 95.5%* |
| 2008 | NY | 2290 | 3.96 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 85.1% |
| 2008 | CA | 2290 | 4.00 | Top 1% | Caucasian | 98.3% |
| 2008 | PA | 2290 | 3.90 | Top 1% | None Indicated | 96.1% |
| 2008 | NY | 2290 | 4.00 | Top 1% | African-American | 99.6% |
| 2008 | XX | 2260 | 4.00 | Top 10% | None Indicated | 97.6% |
| 2008 | CA | 2250 | 3.90 | Top 5% | East Asian | 94.6% |
| 2008 | PA | 2250 | 3.85 | Top 10% | South Asian | 96.4% |
| 2008 | NY | 2240 | 4.00 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 97.6% |
| 2008 | NJ | 2230 | 3.70 | Unknown | Caucasian | 92.7% |
| 2008 | TX | 2230 | 3.70 | Unknown | East Asian | 93.1% |
| 2008 | CA | 2220 | 3.95 | Top 1% | Middle-Eastern | 97.8% |
| 2008 | NJ | 2210 | 3.85 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 91.9% |
| 2008 | CA | 2200 | 3.83 | Top 10% | East Asian | 96.8% |
| 2008 | CA | 2200 | 3.98 | Top 5% | Hispanic | 99.0% |
| 2008 | CA | 2190 | 3.79 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 89.8% |
| 2008 | PA | 2190 | 3.56 | Unknown | Caucasian | 78.3% |
| 2008 | MA | 2190 | 3.60 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 79.3%* |
| 2008 | (Private) | 2190 | 3.87 | Top 10% | East Asian | 95.6% |
| 2008 | XX | 2180 | 3.50 | Top 1% | South Asian | 95.0% |
| 2008 | CO | 2180 | 3.80 | Top 10% | East Asian | 93.4% |
| 2008 | MA | 2170 | 3.40 | Unknown | Caucasian | 66.1%* |
| 2008 | (Private) | 2170 | 3.81 | Top 5% | South Asian | 94.4% |
| 2008 | TX | 2160 | 3.96 | Top 5% | East Asian | 96.0% |
| 2008 | OH | 2160 | 3.42 | Top 20% | South Asian | 86.1% |
| 2008 | WA | 2150 | 3.95 | Top 5% | East Asian | 92.0%* |
| 2008 | MA | 2140 | 3.90 | Valedictorian | Caucasian | 91.7%* |
| 2008 | FL | 2130 | 3.80 | Top 5% | Other | 82.6% |
| 2008 | NY | 2120 | 3.85 | Unknown | Caucasian | 84.8%* |
| 2008 | XX | 2120 | 4.00 | Valedictorian | East Asian | 75.1% |
| 2008 | NJ | 2110 | 3.80 | Top 10% | South Asian | 81.4% |
| 2008 | CA | 2110 | 4.00 | Top 5% | East Asian | 87.6% |
| 2008 | CA | 2090 | 3.90 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 82.2% |
| 2008 | CA | 2090 | 3.98 | Top 5% | East Asian | 86.7% |
| 2008 | TX | 2090 | 3.55 | Top 20% | Hispanic | 88.5% |
| 2008 | CA | 2080 | 3.90 | Top 1% | Caucasian | 93.7% |
| 2008 | MD | 2080 | 3.63 | Unknown | Hispanic | 90.4% |
| 2008 | FL | 2070 | 3.79 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 83.8% |
| 2008 | PA | 2060 | 3.90 | Top 10% | Other | 83.2% |
| 2008 | CA | 2050 | 3.87 | Top 5% | East Asian | 93.2% |
| 2008 | NY | 2050 | 3.50 | Unknown | African-American | 91.5% |
| 2008 | NJ | 2040 | 3.80 | Top 10% | Hispanic | 89.9% |
| 2008 | PA | 2020 | 3.40 | Unknown | None Indicated | 53.3% |
| 2008 | NJ | 2020 | 3.80 | Top 10% | South Asian | 86.3% |
| 2008 | WA | 2020 | 3.92 | Top 10% | East Asian | 80.1% |
| 2008 | PA | 2010 | 3.94 | Salutatorian | African-American | 88.9% |
| 2008 | OH | 2010 | 3.81 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 75.4%* |
| 2008 | XX | 2000 | 3.00 | Top 5% | South Asian | 43.7% |
| 2008 | CT | 2000 | 4.00 | Valedictorian | East Asian | 87.4%* |
| 2008 | CA | 1980 | 3.67 | Valedictorian | Caucasian | 81.4% |
| 2008 | ME | 1940 | 3.80 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 56.8% |
| 2008 | FL | 1930 | 4.00 | Salutatorian | Caucasian | 62.8% |
| 2008 | PA | 1930 | 3.70 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 59.2%* |
| 2008 | PA | 1880 | 3.30 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 23.6%* |
| 2008 | CA | 1870 | 3.50 | Top 20% | East Asian | 43.7% |
| 2008 | HI | 1820 | 4.00 | Top 1% | Caucasian | 71.6%* |
| 2008 | NY | 1770 | 4.00 | Unknown | Hispanic | 58.6% |
| 2008 | CA | 1640 | 3.67 | Top 10% | None Indicated | 29.1% |
| 2008 | MN | 1430 | 3.93 | Top 5% | African-American | 99.4% |
| 2008 | FL | 30 | 3.71 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 83.3% |
| 2008 | FL | 35 | 3.98 | Top 1% | South Asian | 98.8% |
| 2008 | IL | 34 | 3.64 | Unknown | Other | 94.0% |
| 2008 | FL | 33 | 3.90 | Top 5% | South Asian | 92.5%* |
| 2008 | IL | 32 | 3.70 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 81.2%* |
| 2008 | SD | 32 | 4.00 | Valedictorian | Middle-Eastern | 96.8% |
| 2008 | IL | 31 | 4.00 | Top 1% | Caucasian | 90.7%* |
| 2008 | NY | 28 | 4.00 | Class Not Ranked | African-American | 75.7% |
| 2008 | IL | 19 | 3.00 | Top 10% | African-American | 3.5%* |
| 2007 | NY | 2350 | 3.70 | Unknown | None Indicated | 97.1% |
| 2007 | IL | 2290 | 3.82 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 97.6% |
| 2007 | NJ | 2260 | 3.89 | Top 5% | South Asian | 94.6%* |
| 2007 | NJ | 2220 | 4.00 | Top 1% | South Asian | 95.7%* |
| 2007 | NJ | 2220 | 3.88 | Top 10% | South Asian | 92.1%* |
| 2007 | NJ | 2180 | 3.90 | Unknown | None Indicated | 89.4%* |
| 2007 | CA | 2160 | 3.82 | Top 5% | East Asian | 89.4%* |
| 2007 | FL | 2100 | 4.00 | Unknown | Hispanic | 96.5%* |
| 2007 | NY | 2070 | 3.90 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 86.6%* |
| 2007 | NY | 2020 | 3.90 | Top 1% | Hispanic | 95.5%* |
| 2007 | CA | 2000 | 3.61 | Top 5% | East Asian | 66.3%* |
| 2007 | WA | 1950 | 3.95 | Top 5% | None Indicated | 79.4%* |
| 2007 | PA | 1930 | 3.70 | Top 10% | South Asian | 59.2%* |
| 2007 | CA | 1840 | 4.00 | Salutatorian | Hispanic | 91.6%* |
| 2007 | OH | 34 | 3.33 | Unknown | South Asian | 73.0%* |
| 2007 | TN | 34 | 4.00 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 96.1%* |
| 2007 | CA | 33 | 3.83 | Class Not Ranked | Other | 87.9%* |
| 2006 | CA | 2340 | 3.80 | Top 10% | East Asian | 94.7%* |
| 2006 | AK | 2330 | 4.00 | Valedictorian | East Asian | 98.6% |
| 2006 | CA | 2330 | 3.94 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 96.2%* |
| 2006 | CA | 2220 | 3.80 | Unknown | East Asian | 88.7%* |
| 2005 | TX | 2390 | 4.00 | Top 5% | East Asian | 98.0%* |
| 2003 | CA | 2040 | 3.78 | Top 5% | None Indicated | 79.7%* |
| 2002 | TX | 1530 | 4.00 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 96.7%* |
|
| 2010 | CA | 2190 | 3.75 | Top 15% | East Asian | 85.3%* |
| 2009 | MA | 2180 | 3.05 | Class Not Ranked | None Indicated | 92.5% |
| 2009 | NJ | 1990 | 3.80 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 77.4% |
| 2009 | DE | 1960 | 3.40 | Class Not Ranked | East Asian | 59.5% |
| 2009 | NJ | 1950 | 3.84 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 59.0% |
| 2009 | IL | 31 | 3.64 | Class Not Ranked | East Asian | 69.0%* |
| 2008 | NY | 2160 | 3.90 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 90.2% |
| 2008 | CA | 2050 | 3.72 | Class Not Ranked | Other | 66.9% |
| 2008 | NJ | 31 | 3.40 | Unknown | None Indicated | 53.3%* |
| 2007 | NJ | 2320 | 3.91 | Top 10% | East Asian | 96.7% |
| 2007 | NY | 2130 | 3.50 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 63.9%* |
| 2003 | CT | 1420 | 3.80 | Top 5% | South Asian | 87.1%* |
|
|
| 2010 | NY | 2030 | 3.40 | Unknown | East Asian | 29.7% |
| 2010 | CA | 2030 | 3.71 | Class Not Ranked | East Asian | 27.1% |
| 2010 | VA | 2000 | 3.79 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 84.6%* |
| 2010 | CA | 1940 | 3.44 | Top 35% | Caucasian | 99.8% |
| 2010 | WI | 1930 | 3.60 | Top 20% | South Asian | 8.1% |
| 2010 | CA | 1920 | 3.69 | Unknown | African-American | 25.9% |
| 2010 | CT | 1910 | 3.44 | Class Not Ranked | East Asian | 31.2% |
| 2010 | NJ | 1870 | 3.75 | Top 20% | Hispanic | 76.6%* |
| 2010 | TX | 1860 | 3.12 | Top 30% | South Asian | 4.6% |
| 2010 | AZ | 1820 | 3.82 | Top 15% | Hispanic | 15.7% |
| 2010 | NY | 1710 | 3.40 | Top 30% | East Asian | 22.5% |
| 2010 | CA | 29 | 3.66 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 100.0% |
| 2010 | FL | 27 | 3.47 | Top 1% | Hispanic | 33.9% |
| 2009 | FL | 2310 | 3.67 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 96.8% |
| 2009 | (Private) | 2270 | 4.00 | Valedictorian | Other | 96.8%* |
| 2009 | XX | 2240 | 3.30 | Unknown | South Asian | 88.7% |
| 2009 | (Private) | 2200 | 3.90 | Class Not Ranked | East Asian | 94.0% |
| 2009 | XX | 2190 | 3.70 | Top 20% | East Asian | 63.4% |
| 2009 | NJ | 2160 | 3.30 | Unknown | East Asian | 19.6% |
| 2009 | GA | 2160 | 3.40 | Top 20% | East Asian | 80.4% |
| 2009 | NY | 2150 | 3.48 | Class Not Ranked | Middle-Eastern | 74.0% |
| 2009 | NY | 2140 | 3.54 | Top 20% | Other | 81.1% |
| 2009 | NJ | 2120 | 2.30 | Bottom 30% | Hispanic | 34.5% |
| 2009 | NJ | 2120 | 3.75 | Top 5% | East Asian | 48.4% |
| 2009 | CA | 2110 | 3.60 | Top 20% | East Asian | 20.8% |
| 2009 | NY | 2110 | 3.54 | Class Not Ranked | East Asian | 21.8% |
| 2009 | NJ | 2100 | 3.60 | Top 10% | East Asian | 39.3% |
| 2009 | CA | 2080 | 3.50 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 66.4% |
| 2009 | MD | 2080 | 3.87 | Top 20% | South Asian | 73.5% |
| 2009 | MO | 2080 | 3.38 | Class Not Ranked | None Indicated | 62.0% |
| 2009 | (Private) | 2060 | 3.33 | Class Not Ranked | South Asian | 15.9% |
| 2009 | NJ | 2050 | 3.40 | Class Not Ranked | South Asian | 17.8% |
| 2009 | CA | 2050 | 3.93 | Top 1% | Caucasian | 80.1% |
| 2009 | NJ | 2050 | 3.50 | Class Not Ranked | South Asian | 79.3% |
| 2009 | CO | 2040 | 3.47 | Top 20% | African-American | 88.7% |
| 2009 | NY | 2010 | 3.80 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 29.9% |
| 2009 | FL | 1990 | 3.90 | Top 5% | South Asian | 72.5% |
| 2009 | XX | 1980 | 3.95 | Top 1% | East Asian | 86.3% |
| 2009 | XX | 1970 | 3.80 | Class Not Ranked | South Asian | 50.7% |
| 2009 | PA | 1960 | 3.67 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 57.0%* |
| 2009 | TX | 1950 | 3.56 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 70.7% |
| 2009 | PA | 1940 | 3.42 | Top 20% | East Asian | 6.6% |
| 2009 | CT | 1880 | 2.90 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 23.4% |
| 2009 | PA | 1870 | 3.60 | Top 5% | South Asian | 48.3%* |
| 2009 | NY | 1870 | 4.00 | Top 10% | African-American | 74.0% |
| 2009 | XX | 1860 | 3.75 | Top 20% | Other | 9.0% |
| 2009 | NY | 1840 | 3.60 | Top 5% | Middle-Eastern | 9.8% |
| 2009 | CA | 1830 | 3.76 | Top 5% | East Asian | 78.1% |
| 2009 | MD | 1830 | 3.48 | Unknown | Caucasian | 48.5% |
| 2009 | MD | 1820 | 3.46 | Top 30% | South Asian | 24.5% |
| 2009 | NY | 1820 | 3.55 | Top 10% | East Asian | 34.1% |
| 2009 | NY | 1810 | 3.00 | Unknown | Hispanic | 55.7% |
| 2009 | CA | 1800 | 3.15 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 10.4% |
| 2009 | NY | 1790 | 4.00 | Top 1% | East Asian | 8.1% |
| 2009 | MA | 1770 | 3.35 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 17.4%* |
| 2009 | (Private) | 1750 | 3.80 | Top 20% | African-American | 47.7% |
| 2009 | NC | 1740 | 2.70 | Top 40% | African-American | 11.8% |
| 2009 | NJ | 1710 | 3.66 | Top 30% | Middle-Eastern | 22.5% |
| 2009 | CA | 1680 | 2.82 | Unknown | African-American | 10.3% |
| 2009 | TX | 1670 | 3.70 | Top 10% | African-American | 58.0% |
| 2009 | NC | 1640 | 3.30 | Top 30% | African-American | 14.3% |
| 2009 | NY | 1560 | 3.50 | Top 5% | South Asian | 10.4% |
| 2009 | FL | 1000 | 2.90 | Unknown | Caucasian | 1.3%* |
| 2009 | VA | 33 | 3.75 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 84.6% |
| 2009 | TX | 30 | 3.20 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 32.0%* |
| 2009 | KS | 28 | 3.92 | Top 5% | East Asian | 60.5% |
| 2009 | MI | 28 | 3.15 | Unknown | Caucasian | 17.6%* |
| 2009 | (Private) | 24 | 3.93 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 30.7% |
| 2008 | NJ | 2240 | 3.34 | Top 30% | East Asian | 59.6%* |
| 2008 | PA | 2190 | 3.50 | Top 20% | East Asian | 79.1% |
| 2008 | (Private) | 2190 | 3.52 | Top 20% | East Asian | 79.5% |
| 2008 | CA | 2170 | 3.69 | Top 20% | East Asian | 41.4% |
| 2008 | CA | 2130 | 3.25 | Bottom 40% | Caucasian | 28.1% |
| 2008 | CA | 2130 | 3.94 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 93.6% |
| 2008 | GA | 2090 | 3.40 | Bottom 40% | Caucasian | 39.6% |
| 2008 | NY | 2080 | 3.30 | Class Not Ranked | South Asian | 76.3% |
| 2008 | NY | 2060 | 3.70 | Unknown | Middle-Eastern | 67.8% |
| 2008 | MA | 2050 | 3.30 | Unknown | Hispanic | 74.5%* |
| 2008 | CT | 2050 | 3.40 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 46.2%* |
| 2008 | CA | 2030 | 3.36 | Top 20% | East Asian | 41.1%* |
| 2008 | CA | 2020 | 3.50 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 78.3% |
| 2008 | CA | 2020 | 3.73 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 64.8%* |
| 2008 | NJ | 2010 | 3.20 | Top 40% | Hispanic | 64.5% |
| 2008 | NC | 1990 | 2.76 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 24.0% |
| 2008 | NY | 1990 | 3.20 | Top 20% | South Asian | 26.8% |
| 2008 | RI | 1980 | 3.70 | Top 5% | None Indicated | 69.3%* |
| 2008 | PA | 1970 | 3.85 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 68.2% |
| 2008 | NJ | 1960 | 4.00 | Valedictorian | None Indicated | 80.2% |
| 2008 | CA | 1930 | 4.00 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 79.0%* |
| 2008 | OH | 1920 | 3.53 | Unknown | Caucasian | 42.0%* |
| 2008 | ID | 1900 | 3.90 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 51.4% |
| 2008 | (Private) | 1890 | 3.75 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 74.1% |
| 2008 | CA | 1890 | 3.70 | Top 20% | None Indicated | 32.8% |
| 2008 | IL | 1870 | 4.00 | Salutatorian | Caucasian | 77.2%* |
| 2008 | (Private) | 1810 | 3.81 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 42.6% |
| 2008 | CA | 1790 | 3.70 | Top 10% | South Asian | 38.5% |
| 2008 | MD | 1760 | 3.48 | Unknown | Caucasian | 27.9%* |
| 2008 | AZ | 1760 | 2.70 | Unknown | African-American | 33.7% |
| 2008 | WA | 1730 | 3.71 | Top 30% | Caucasian | 54.2%* |
| 2008 | CA | 1680 | 3.30 | Top 10% | Middle-Eastern | 8.7% |
| 2008 | XX | 1650 | 3.93 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 29.1% |
| 2008 | CA | 1610 | 3.71 | Top 5% | African-American | 43.7% |
| 2008 | GA | 1580 | 3.50 | Bottom 50% | Caucasian | 3.2%* |
| 2008 | XX | 1540 | 3.97 | Top 10% | East Asian | 18.3% |
| 2008 | MI | 30 | 3.97 | Salutatorian | Caucasian | 87.0%* |
| 2008 | NY | 29 | 3.95 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 59.7% |
| 2008 | WI | 27 | 3.55 | Top 40% | None Indicated | 16.9%* |
| 2008 | MI | 24 | 3.43 | Top 40% | South Asian | 6.7% |
| 2007 | CA | 2070 | 3.20 | Class Not Ranked | East Asian | 39.4%* |
| 2007 | VA | 2020 | 3.20 | Top 20% | South Asian | 29.5%* |
| 2007 | NY | 1920 | 3.65 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 58.5%* |
| 2007 | NY | 1670 | 3.97 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 47.3%* |
| 2007 | NM | 27 | 3.80 | Top 10% | Native American | 81.0%* |
| 2006 | CT | 1740 | 3.00 | Class Not Ranked | Other | 5.8%* |
| 2003 | CA | 1420 | 3.20 | Top 30% | East Asian | 35.3%* |
| 2002 | (Private) | 1200 | 3.00 | Unknown | African-American | 24.6%* |
| 2001 | CA | 2080 | 3.80 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 85.3% |
|
| 2012 | IL | 2360 | 3.45 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 90.3%* |
| 2012 | TX | 2160 | 3.69 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 85.4%* |
| 2011 | TX | 2390 | 4.00 | Unknown | Caucasian | 97.9% |
| 2011 | IL | 2230 | 3.50 | Top 25% | Caucasian | 86.8% |
| 2011 | NM | 2190 | 3.32 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 90.9% |
| 2011 | CA | 2100 | 3.98 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 92.6% |
| 2011 | XX | 2090 | 4.00 | Top 1% | South Asian | 91.6%* |
| 2011 | TX | 1440 | 3.50 | Unknown | Caucasian | 4.7%* |
| 2010 | XX | 2400 | 3.60 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 98.2% |
| 2010 | MA | 2400 | 3.68 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 97.1% |
| 2010 | NC | 2400 | 3.70 | Unknown | South Asian | 94.1%* |
| 2010 | CA | 2380 | 3.73 | Top 10% | South Asian | 98.3% |
| 2010 | NY | 2380 | 4.00 | Salutatorian | African-American | 100.0% |
| 2010 | CT | 2380 | 3.80 | Top 10% | South Asian | 99.0% |
| 2010 | VA | 2380 | 3.89 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 97.1% |
| 2010 | GA | 2370 | 3.30 | Top 25% | South Asian | 89.5% |
| 2010 | NH | 2370 | 4.00 | Valedictorian | Caucasian | 99.2% |
| 2010 | PA | 2350 | 3.41 | Top 5% | East Asian | 96.9% |
| 2010 | NY | 2330 | 3.95 | Top 2% | Caucasian | 97.8% |
| 2010 | TX | 2330 | 4.00 | Top 1% | South Asian | 98.9% |
| 2010 | NH | 2330 | 3.60 | Top 25% | Caucasian | 90.8% |
| 2010 | NY | 2320 | 4.00 | Valedictorian | Hispanic | 100.0% |
| 2010 | CA | 2320 | 3.67 | Top 10% | South Asian | 96.5% |
| 2010 | CA | 2310 | 4.00 | Top 2% | Caucasian | 97.9% |
| 2010 | (Private) | 2310 | 3.55 | Class Not Ranked | East Asian | 94.8% |
| 2010 | VA | 2300 | 3.79 | Class Not Ranked | African-American | 98.3% |
| 2010 | XX | 2300 | 4.00 | Top 1% | South Asian | 99.0% |
| 2010 | NJ | 2300 | 3.49 | Class Not Ranked | East Asian | 96.3% |
| 2010 | FL | 2290 | 4.00 | Valedictorian | East Asian | 97.1%* |
| 2010 | NY | 2290 | 3.57 | Class Not Ranked | None Indicated | 96.4% |
| 2010 | CA | 2280 | 4.00 | Class Not Ranked | African-American | 98.7% |
| 2010 | XX | 2280 | 3.90 | Class Not Ranked | South Asian | 100.0% |
| 2010 | PA | 2280 | 3.98 | Top 3% | Caucasian | 95.7% |
| 2010 | NY | 2270 | 4.00 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 94.7% |
| 2010 | NY | 2270 | 3.64 | Class Not Ranked | South Asian | 94.4% |
| 2010 | TX | 2270 | 3.91 | Top 10% | East Asian | 97.3% |
| 2010 | CT | 2270 | 3.95 | Top 3% | Caucasian | 100.0% |
| 2010 | CT | 2270 | 3.98 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 97.6% |
| 2010 | FL | 2260 | 3.90 | Top 1% | Caucasian | 95.4%* |
| 2010 | MA | 2260 | 4.00 | Top 3% | Caucasian | 98.3% |
| 2010 | MA | 2260 | 3.30 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 85.0% |
| 2010 | WA | 2260 | 3.61 | Top 20% | East Asian | 92.4% |
| 2010 | NJ | 2260 | 3.79 | Top 30% | East Asian | 100.0% |
| 2010 | MD | 2250 | 3.63 | Class Not Ranked | East Asian | 93.6% |
| 2010 | MD | 2250 | 3.80 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 97.6% |
| 2010 | NC | 2240 | 3.79 | Top 15% | Caucasian | 92.2% |
| 2010 | CA | 2240 | 3.96 | Valedictorian | Other | 97.3% |
| 2010 | (Private) | 2240 | 3.40 | Top 15% | East Asian | 91.9% |
| 2010 | CA | 2240 | 3.91 | Top 5% | East Asian | 96.8% |
| 2010 | NJ | 2240 | 4.00 | Top 2% | Caucasian | 98.2% |
| 2010 | MD | 2240 | 3.96 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 96.3% |
| 2010 | GA | 2240 | 3.67 | Top 20% | East Asian | 83.9%* |
| 2010 | CA | 2230 | 3.90 | Top 2% | East Asian | 96.3% |
| 2010 | NY | 2230 | 4.00 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 98.2% |
| 2010 | MD | 2230 | 3.64 | Top 15% | East Asian | 92.7% |
| 2010 | IN | 2230 | 4.00 | Valedictorian | Caucasian | 97.6% |
| 2010 | KS | 2220 | 4.00 | Top 4% | East Asian | 96.5% |
| 2010 | SD | 2220 | 3.67 | Unknown | None Indicated | 85.4% |
| 2010 | PA | 2220 | 3.65 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 90.2% |
| 2010 | WA | 2220 | 3.91 | Top 10% | Middle-Eastern | 90.1% |
| 2010 | CA | 2220 | 3.80 | Top 5% | South Asian | 94.9% |
| 2010 | NY | 2210 | 3.00 | Class Not Ranked | None Indicated | 88.9% |
| 2010 | XX | 2210 | 3.80 | Class Not Ranked | South Asian | 89.6% |
| 2010 | OH | 2200 | 3.40 | Class Not Ranked | None Indicated | 77.8% |
| 2010 | CA | 2200 | 3.49 | Class Not Ranked | South Asian | 88.9% |
| 2010 | (Private) | 2200 | 3.98 | Valedictorian | South Asian | 96.8% |
| 2010 | WA | 2200 | 4.00 | Valedictorian | Caucasian | 94.3% |
| 2010 | WA | 2190 | 3.85 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 94.5% |
| 2010 | GA | 2190 | 4.00 | Top 10% | East Asian | 95.7% |
| 2010 | GA | 2180 | 3.81 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 92.0% |
| 2010 | NH | 2180 | 3.41 | Class Not Ranked | South Asian | 77.1% |
| 2010 | NY | 2180 | 4.00 | Top 2% | East Asian | 100.0% |
| 2010 | CA | 2180 | 3.96 | Class Not Ranked | East Asian | 93.6% |
| 2010 | (Private) | 2180 | 3.90 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 95.0% |
| 2010 | NH | 2180 | 3.77 | Top 3% | Caucasian | 66.7% |
| 2010 | TX | 2180 | 3.10 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 47.4%* |
| 2010 | CA | 2170 | 3.96 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 97.0% |
| 2010 | FL | 2170 | 3.97 | Top 1% | South Asian | 95.6% |
| 2010 | (Private) | 2170 | 3.75 | Class Not Ranked | South Asian | 83.1% |
| 2010 | NJ | 2170 | 3.80 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 87.8% |
| 2010 | NV | 2170 | 3.52 | Top 20% | Other | 82.3% |
| 2010 | NJ | 2170 | 3.80 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 94.6% |
| 2010 | CA | 2170 | 3.90 | Top 4% | East Asian | 95.4% |
| 2010 | OH | 2160 | 3.50 | Top 15% | Caucasian | 80.6% |
| 2010 | NJ | 2160 | 3.59 | Top 15% | Caucasian | 91.7% |
| 2010 | NJ | 2160 | 3.80 | Class Not Ranked | South Asian | 92.2% |
| 2010 | ID | 2150 | 3.90 | Top 2% | Caucasian | 85.1% |
| 2010 | CT | 2150 | 3.90 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 88.5% |
| 2010 | FL | 2150 | 3.96 | Top 1% | Caucasian | 94.5% |
| 2010 | CA | 2150 | 3.50 | Unknown | East Asian | 85.5% |
| 2010 | NY | 2150 | 3.90 | Top 10% | Hispanic | 95.3% |
| 2010 | CA | 2140 | 3.75 | Top 10% | East Asian | 97.4% |
| 2010 | CA | 2140 | 3.69 | Top 10% | East Asian | 48.7% |
| 2010 | NY | 2140 | 3.80 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 83.5%* |
| 2010 | CT | 2140 | 3.30 | Class Not Ranked | None Indicated | 76.0% |
| 2010 | TN | 2130 | 3.30 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 77.4% |
| 2010 | (Private) | 2130 | 3.80 | Top 3% | South Asian | 93.0% |
| 2010 | NY | 2130 | 3.80 | Top 10% | South Asian | 92.3% |
| 2010 | CA | 2130 | 3.50 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 81.7% |
| 2010 | CA | 2130 | 3.94 | Top 10% | East Asian | 92.6% |
| 2010 | SC | 2130 | 3.80 | Top 3% | Caucasian | 91.5% |
| 2010 | MD | 2130 | 3.88 | Top 4% | Native American | 98.3% |
| 2010 | WA | 2130 | 3.80 | Unknown | East Asian | 94.2% |
| 2010 | WA | 2130 | 3.99 | Top 2% | Caucasian | 93.5% |
| 2010 | TN | 2120 | 3.99 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 92.7% |
| 2010 | NJ | 2120 | 3.47 | Class Not Ranked | South Asian | 80.8% |
| 2010 | CT | 2120 | 3.10 | Top 30% | Caucasian | 100.0% |
| 2010 | CA | 2120 | 3.14 | Class Not Ranked | East Asian | 75.4% |
| 2010 | PA | 2120 | 3.91 | Top 3% | Caucasian | 93.0% |
| 2010 | OH | 2110 | 3.85 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 93.0% |
| 2010 | VA | 2110 | 3.90 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 88.0% |
| 2010 | NY | 2110 | 3.66 | Class Not Ranked | Hispanic | 88.7% |
| 2010 | NJ | 2100 | 3.40 | Class Not Ranked | None Indicated | 91.9% |
| 2010 | CA | 2100 | 3.85 | Top 4% | East Asian | 95.4% |
| 2010 | TX | 2100 | 3.67 | Top 15% | South Asian | 77.1%* |
| 2010 | PA | 2100 | 3.90 | Top 10% | Hispanic | 93.5% |
| 2010 | MA | 2100 | 4.00 | Top 2% | Caucasian | 93.7% |
| 2010 | CA | 2100 | 3.87 | Top 10% | East Asian | 91.5% |
| 2010 | CA | 2100 | 3.78 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 80.9% |
| 2010 | CA | 2100 | 3.48 | Top 10% | East Asian | 65.4% |
| 2010 | CA | 2100 | 3.80 | Top 3% | Caucasian | 47.9% |
| 2010 | NY | 2100 | 4.00 | Top 2% | South Asian | 87.0% |
| 2010 | NJ | 2090 | 3.89 | Top 5% | South Asian | 87.2% |
| 2010 | FL | 2090 | 3.52 | Top 20% | Hispanic | 84.3% |
| 2010 | NJ | 2090 | 3.80 | Class Not Ranked | East Asian | 76.4% |
| 2010 | NJ | 2090 | 3.88 | Top 3% | Caucasian | 87.0% |
| 2010 | CA | 2090 | 3.54 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 78.0% |
| 2010 | CA | 2090 | 4.00 | Top 2% | East Asian | 60.3% |
| 2010 | IN | 2080 | 4.00 | Valedictorian | Caucasian | 91.4%* |
| 2010 | MD | 2080 | 3.65 | Top 25% | Caucasian | 77.1% |
| 2010 | FL | 2080 | 3.40 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 62.6%* |
| 2010 | MD | 2080 | 3.52 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 66.4%* |
| 2010 | NH | 2080 | 3.83 | Top 4% | Caucasian | 92.6% |
| 2010 | CA | 2080 | 3.86 | Top 20% | East Asian | 69.0% |
| 2010 | CT | 2070 | 3.65 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 76.1%* |
| 2010 | (Private) | 2070 | 3.80 | Class Not Ranked | East Asian | 81.9% |
| 2010 | CA | 2070 | 3.57 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 76.4% |
| 2010 | WA | 2070 | 3.98 | Top 3% | Caucasian | 90.9% |
| 2010 | NJ | 2070 | 3.50 | Class Not Ranked | African-American | 83.9% |
| 2010 | CT | 2070 | 3.33 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 69.6% |
| 2010 | WA | 2070 | 3.50 | Top 35% | East Asian | 43.5%* |
| 2010 | CT | 2070 | 3.48 | Class Not Ranked | Hispanic | 83.6% |
| 2010 | FL | 2060 | 3.99 | Top 1% | East Asian | 92.9%* |
| 2010 | IL | 2060 | 4.00 | Valedictorian | Caucasian | 91.0%* |
| 2010 | MA | 2060 | 3.55 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 58.7% |
| 2010 | NH | 2060 | 3.86 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 68.8% |
| 2010 | CA | 2060 | 3.70 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 85.9% |
| 2010 | FL | 2060 | 3.35 | Top 2% | Hispanic | 90.0% |
| 2010 | NJ | 2060 | 4.00 | Top 4% | East Asian | 89.5% |
| 2010 | WA | 2060 | 3.90 | Top 5% | East Asian | 80.6% |
| 2010 | XX | 2050 | 3.80 | Top 10% | Hispanic | 96.9% |
| 2010 | FL | 2050 | 3.94 | Top 1% | South Asian | 89.0% |
| 2010 | XX | 2050 | 3.95 | Class Not Ranked | Other | 81.6% |
| 2010 | PA | 2050 | 3.60 | Top 20% | African-American | 76.2% |
| 2010 | FL | 2050 | 3.53 | Unknown | Hispanic | 84.8%* |
| 2010 | VA | 2050 | 4.00 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 94.2% |
| 2010 | GA | 2040 | 3.63 | Top 20% | African-American | 90.7% |
| 2010 | NY | 2040 | 3.50 | Class Not Ranked | None Indicated | 74.3% |
| 2010 | XX | 2040 | 3.60 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 64.3% |
| 2010 | VA | 2040 | 3.50 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 52.0%* |
| 2010 | NY | 2040 | 3.90 | Top 25% | Caucasian | 73.7%* |
| 2010 | TX | 2040 | 3.80 | Top 3% | African-American | 74.5% |
| 2010 | CA | 2040 | 3.97 | Salutatorian | East Asian | 88.5% |
| 2010 | NJ | 2030 | 3.73 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 75.3% |
| 2010 | FL | 2030 | 3.70 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 72.0% |
| 2010 | NY | 2030 | 3.90 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 83.6% |
| 2010 | NY | 2030 | 3.67 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 66.0% |
| 2010 | NY | 2030 | 3.60 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 70.4% |
| 2010 | CA | 2020 | 3.91 | Class Not Ranked | South Asian | 78.9% |
| 2010 | CT | 2020 | 3.80 | Top 15% | Caucasian | 75.2% |
| 2010 | MA | 2020 | 3.89 | Top 2% | South Asian | 29.3% |
| 2010 | NJ | 2020 | 3.40 | Class Not Ranked | South Asian | 60.4% |
| 2010 | CA | 2020 | 3.52 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 59.9% |
| 2010 | NJ | 2020 | 3.80 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 72.6%* |
| 2010 | MD | 2010 | 3.86 | Top 10% | Native American | 100.0%* |
| 2010 | CA | 2010 | 3.80 | Top 5% | East Asian | 76.2% |
| 2010 | (Private) | 2010 | 3.30 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 55.4% |
| 2010 | MD | 2000 | 3.30 | Class Not Ranked | South Asian | 57.5% |
| 2010 | TN | 2000 | 3.60 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 69.0% |
| 2010 | NY | 2000 | 3.65 | Class Not Ranked | East Asian | 15.8% |
| 2010 | FL | 2000 | 4.00 | Salutatorian | None Indicated | 83.4% |
| 2010 | MA | 2000 | 3.65 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 61.2%* |
| 2010 | VA | 2000 | 3.53 | Top 5% | African-American | 82.3% |
| 2010 | MA | 2000 | 3.51 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 65.1% |
| 2010 | CA | 2000 | 3.33 | Top 15% | East Asian | 39.2%* |
| 2010 | NY | 2000 | 3.70 | Unknown | Caucasian | 64.4%* |
| 2010 | NY | 2000 | 3.30 | Top 40% | Hispanic | 100.0% |
| 2010 | FL | 1990 | 3.50 | Top 10% | East Asian | 88.9% |
| 2010 | CT | 1990 | 3.68 | Top 15% | Caucasian | 77.6%* |
| 2010 | IL | 1990 | 3.75 | Class Not Ranked | Middle-Eastern | 75.2%* |
| 2010 | CA | 1990 | 3.45 | Class Not Ranked | Middle-Eastern | 62.6% |
| 2010 | CA | 1990 | 3.58 | Top 20% | East Asian | 46.8% |
| 2010 | TN | 1990 | 4.00 | Top 2% | East Asian | 85.9%* |
| 2010 | NY | 1990 | 3.53 | Unknown | East Asian | 51.3%* |
| 2010 | CA | 1990 | 3.28 | Class Not Ranked | East Asian | 53.4% |
| 2010 | NJ | 1990 | 3.80 | Class Not Ranked | Hispanic | 90.5% |
| 2010 | NC | 1990 | 3.67 | Top 4% | Middle-Eastern | 69.3%* |
| 2010 | NY | 1990 | 3.79 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 63.9% |
| 2010 | CA | 1990 | 3.46 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 63.5% |
| 2010 | FL | 1980 | 3.20 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 55.6% |
| 2010 | NY | 1980 | 3.60 | Class Not Ranked | East Asian | 54.7% |
| 2010 | CA | 1980 | 3.75 | Top 15% | Caucasian | 53.3% |
| 2010 | XX | 1980 | 3.70 | Top 10% | Hispanic | 81.0% |
| 2010 | XX | 1980 | 3.50 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 47.9% |
| 2010 | CA | 1980 | 3.86 | Top 10% | None Indicated | 79.1% |
| 2010 | NH | 1980 | 3.74 | Top 10% | Hispanic | 89.0%* |
| 2010 | (Private) | 1970 | 3.35 | Top 30% | African-American | 77.3% |
| 2010 | XX | 1970 | 3.50 | Unknown | South Asian | 68.1% |
| 2010 | NJ | 1970 | 3.60 | Top 15% | Caucasian | 75.5% |
| 2010 | NY | 1970 | 3.17 | Bottom 50% | Caucasian | 24.0% |
| 2010 | XX | 1970 | 3.70 | Top 15% | None Indicated | 19.1% |
| 2010 | CA | 1960 | 3.40 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 56.3% |
| 2010 | CA | 1960 | 3.80 | Top 4% | Caucasian | 73.4%* |
| 2010 | NC | 1960 | 2.90 | Bottom 30% | Caucasian | 4.3% |
| 2010 | CA | 1960 | 3.60 | Unknown | Caucasian | 52.2%* |
| 2010 | WA | 1960 | 3.48 | Top 40% | Other | 25.2%* |
| 2010 | PA | 1960 | 3.90 | Top 3% | South Asian | 77.2% |
| 2010 | NY | 1950 | 3.75 | Top 30% | Other | 90.7% |
| 2010 | (Private) | 1950 | 3.32 | Class Not Ranked | None Indicated | 50.8% |
| 2010 | CA | 1950 | 3.64 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 74.1% |
| 2010 | CT | 1950 | 3.60 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 100.0%* |
| 2010 | XX | 1950 | 3.75 | Class Not Ranked | Other | 71.2% |
| 2010 | CA | 1950 | 3.41 | Top 25% | East Asian | 29.0% |
| 2010 | NY | 1950 | 3.64 | Class Not Ranked | East Asian | 54.0% |
| 2010 | MA | 1950 | 3.40 | Top 15% | Caucasian | 49.2% |
| 2010 | MD | 1950 | 3.65 | Top 15% | Native American | 85.7% |
| 2010 | NY | 1940 | 3.65 | Top 20% | South Asian | 58.3%* |
| 2010 | IN | 1940 | 3.95 | Class Not Ranked | East Asian | 57.2% |
| 2010 | NC | 1940 | 4.00 | Class Not Ranked | East Asian | 82.5% |
| 2010 | NY | 1940 | 3.68 | Top 15% | Caucasian | 42.1% |
| 2010 | XX | 1940 | 3.60 | Top 10% | East Asian | 61.2% |
| 2010 | NJ | 1940 | 3.80 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 46.8% |
| 2010 | NY | 1930 | 3.30 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 43.7% |
| 2010 | NC | 1920 | 3.55 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 39.3%* |
| 2010 | MD | 1920 | 3.50 | Top 10% | South Asian | 44.1%* |
| 2010 | NY | 1920 | 3.60 | Top 20% | Other | 100.0% |
| 2010 | TX | 1910 | 3.27 | Top 15% | Hispanic | 64.5% |
| 2010 | XX | 1910 | 3.30 | Class Not Ranked | East Asian | 43.0% |
| 2010 | XX | 1910 | 3.00 | Top 20% | East Asian | 33.9% |
| 2010 | NV | 1910 | 3.83 | Top 10% | East Asian | 70.9% |
| 2010 | FL | 1900 | 3.90 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 83.2% |
| 2010 | NY | 1900 | 3.96 | Top 5% | Middle-Eastern | 79.6% |
| 2010 | OR | 1900 | 3.49 | Unknown | Caucasian | 36.7%* |
| 2010 | NY | 1900 | 4.00 | Top 3% | Caucasian | 76.2% |
| 2010 | (Private) | 1900 | 3.20 | Top 35% | South Asian | 13.7% |
| 2010 | FL | 1900 | 3.40 | Class Not Ranked | Hispanic | 63.1%* |
| 2010 | GA | 1890 | 3.69 | Top 35% | South Asian | 56.8%* |
| 2010 | GA | 1890 | 3.50 | Top 30% | Other | 32.2%* |
| 2010 | NY | 1890 | 3.60 | Unknown | Caucasian | 100.0% |
| 2010 | MD | 1890 | 3.65 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 50.5%* |
| 2010 | VA | 1890 | 3.89 | Top 35% | Caucasian | 46.3%* |
| 2010 | OR | 1880 | 4.00 | Valedictorian | Hispanic | 91.0% |
| 2010 | CA | 1880 | 3.50 | Top 30% | Hispanic | 71.5%* |
| 2010 | XX | 1880 | 3.85 | Top 15% | Caucasian | 52.6% |
| 2010 | ID | 1880 | 3.48 | Top 15% | African-American | 66.8% |
| 2010 | AZ | 1880 | 3.78 | Top 15% | Native American | 81.8%* |
| 2010 | CT | 1880 | 3.48 | Top 25% | Caucasian | 32.5% |
| 2010 | VA | 1870 | 3.70 | Top 5% | East Asian | 99.3% |
| 2010 | CA | 1860 | 4.00 | Top 15% | African-American | 89.3% |
| 2010 | XX | 1860 | 3.88 | Top 10% | Middle-Eastern | 100.0% |
| 2010 | CA | 1850 | 3.99 | Top 20% | Other | 68.7% |
| 2010 | (Private) | 1850 | 3.40 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 29.1%* |
| 2010 | CA | 1850 | 3.40 | Top 1% | South Asian | 60.0% |
| 2010 | CA | 1850 | 3.62 | Top 5% | Hispanic | 72.6% |
| 2010 | FL | 1840 | 3.80 | Top 10% | South Asian | 80.5%* |
| 2010 | (Private) | 1840 | 3.20 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 34.7% |
| 2010 | IA | 1830 | 3.85 | Top 15% | East Asian | 40.7% |
| 2010 | TX | 1830 | 3.83 | Top 30% | None Indicated | 46.3%* |
| 2010 | VA | 1830 | 3.80 | Top 15% | None Indicated | 37.5% |
| 2010 | CT | 1830 | 3.40 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 20.7%* |
| 2010 | WA | 1830 | 3.83 | Top 10% | East Asian | 54.9%* |
| 2010 | NY | 1820 | 3.90 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 59.7%* |
| 2010 | (Private) | 1820 | 3.20 | Class Not Ranked | South Asian | 7.2% |
| 2010 | NJ | 1820 | 3.17 | Unknown | None Indicated | 17.9% |
| 2010 | CA | 1820 | 3.83 | Top 3% | Hispanic | 84.8%* |
| 2010 | NY | 1820 | 3.60 | Top 35% | Caucasian | 14.8% |
| 2010 | MD | 1810 | 3.89 | Class Not Ranked | Hispanic | 89.9%* |
| 2010 | NY | 1810 | 3.76 | Top 10% | East Asian | 51.1% |
| 2010 | (Private) | 1810 | 3.69 | Top 10% | East Asian | 66.1% |
| 2010 | AR | 1810 | 3.70 | Class Not Ranked | African-American | 74.8% |
| 2010 | NY | 1810 | 3.00 | Unknown | East Asian | 14.4% |
| 2010 | NJ | 1810 | 3.92 | Unknown | Hispanic | 81.8%* |
| 2010 | (Private) | 1810 | 3.40 | Class Not Ranked | Hispanic | 99.9% |
| 2010 | VA | 1800 | 3.76 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 45.9%* |
| 2010 | CT | 1790 | 3.50 | Top 3% | Caucasian | 40.8% |
| 2010 | XX | 1790 | 3.70 | Class Not Ranked | East Asian | 56.7% |
| 2010 | NV | 1790 | 3.53 | Top 20% | East Asian | 23.3%* |
| 2010 | (Private) | 1780 | 4.00 | Top 1% | Caucasian | 48.3% |
| 2010 | TX | 1780 | 3.90 | Top 1% | South Asian | 60.3%* |
| 2010 | TX | 1770 | 3.88 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 58.3%* |
| 2010 | NY | 1760 | 3.70 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 31.8% |
| 2010 | NY | 1750 | 3.70 | Top 20% | Other | 16.0% |
| 2010 | MA | 1750 | 3.53 | Top 35% | Caucasian | 12.8%* |
| 2010 | CT | 1740 | 3.80 | Top 5% | Hispanic | 72.5% |
| 2010 | NY | 1740 | 3.50 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 99.7% |
| 2010 | NJ | 1730 | 3.70 | Top 25% | Hispanic | 56.8% |
| 2010 | NJ | 1720 | 3.76 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 54.3% |
| 2010 | CA | 1720 | 3.35 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 9.5% |
| 2010 | CT | 1720 | 3.70 | Top 10% | Hispanic | 48.0% |
| 2010 | MA | 1710 | 3.95 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 51.2%* |
| 2010 | CA | 1700 | 3.20 | Top 25% | South Asian | 21.3% |
| 2010 | CT | 1700 | 3.51 | Class Not Ranked | African-American | 26.6% |
| 2010 | NY | 1690 | 3.80 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 50.9%* |
| 2010 | XX | 1690 | 3.00 | Class Not Ranked | South Asian | 10.1% |
| 2010 | CA | 1690 | 3.79 | Top 4% | Caucasian | 19.9% |
| 2010 | NY | 1680 | 3.72 | Top 25% | Caucasian | 12.7% |
| 2010 | (Private) | 1680 | 3.00 | Class Not Ranked | Other | 16.9% |
| 2010 | FL | 1670 | 3.81 | Top 10% | Hispanic | 64.8%* |
| 2010 | NY | 1670 | 3.50 | Top 30% | East Asian | 9.4%* |
| 2010 | FL | 1670 | 3.73 | Top 5% | Other | 17.7% |
| 2010 | XX | 1670 | 3.40 | Class Not Ranked | Hispanic | 33.1%* |
| 2010 | NJ | 1660 | 3.34 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 99.6%* |
| 2010 | GA | 1650 | 3.20 | Unknown | Hispanic | 48.2%* |
| 2010 | IN | 1650 | 3.80 | Top 15% | Caucasian | 42.6%* |
| 2010 | XX | 1630 | 3.90 | Top 2% | Hispanic | 60.6% |
| 2010 | WA | 1630 | 3.74 | Top 20% | East Asian | 18.5%* |
| 2010 | XX | 1630 | 3.40 | Top 25% | Caucasian | 6.9%* |
| 2010 | NY | 1620 | 3.60 | Top 30% | Caucasian | 9.5%* |
| 2010 | NJ | 1610 | 3.02 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 3.1%* |
| 2010 | NY | 1590 | 3.70 | Top 10% | African-American | 64.1% |
| 2010 | CA | 1570 | 3.58 | Top 25% | South Asian | 19.4% |
| 2010 | CA | 1520 | 3.32 | Top 25% | Caucasian | 2.6% |
| 2010 | OH | 1450 | 3.70 | Top 40% | Caucasian | 0.2% |
| 2010 | MA | 1400 | 3.00 | Top 25% | Caucasian | 0.7%* |
| 2010 | CA | 1340 | 3.17 | Top 40% | Hispanic | 2.7% |
| 2010 | NC | 1340 | 1.80 | Unknown | Native American | 0.1%* |
| 2010 | (Private) | 1230 | 1.00 | Unknown | Hispanic | 0.0%* |
| 2010 | IN | 35 | 3.90 | Top 2% | Caucasian | 96.9%* |
| 2010 | CA | 35 | 3.92 | Top 4% | East Asian | 98.3% |
| 2010 | IL | 34 | 3.20 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 61.4%* |
| 2010 | MN | 34 | 3.96 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 94.0%* |
| 2010 | GA | 34 | 3.70 | Top 20% | African-American | 96.1%* |
| 2010 | (Private) | 33 | 3.96 | Top 2% | Caucasian | 94.2%* |
| 2010 | WI | 33 | 3.98 | Top 2% | Caucasian | 94.5%* |
| 2010 | CA | 33 | 3.75 | Unknown | Caucasian | 93.2% |
| 2010 | IL | 33 | 3.50 | Top 40% | South Asian | 74.4% |
| 2010 | MA | 32 | 3.70 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 77.5% |
| 2010 | VA | 32 | 3.30 | Top 15% | None Indicated | 54.4%* |
| 2010 | MI | 32 | 4.00 | Top 1% | Caucasian | 93.1%* |
| 2010 | NY | 32 | 3.80 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 82.5% |
| 2010 | NJ | 31 | 3.78 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 70.8% |
| 2010 | MD | 31 | 3.70 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 99.9% |
| 2010 | CA | 31 | 3.80 | Top 15% | East Asian | 75.3% |
| 2010 | IL | 31 | 3.98 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 91.6% |
| 2010 | KY | 31 | 3.79 | Top 10% | South Asian | 80.0%* |
| 2010 | MI | 31 | 3.67 | Class Not Ranked | South Asian | 70.8%* |
| 2010 | RI | 31 | 3.50 | Top 5% | East Asian | 79.1% |
| 2010 | NM | 30 | 3.85 | Top 10% | Hispanic | 85.6% |
| 2010 | (Private) | 30 | 3.40 | Top 15% | Caucasian | 45.1%* |
| 2010 | NM | 30 | 3.48 | Top 15% | None Indicated | 61.2% |
| 2010 | NM | 30 | 3.50 | Top 15% | South Asian | 52.1%* |
| 2010 | PA | 30 | 4.00 | Top 1% | East Asian | 87.6%* |
| 2010 | NY | 30 | 3.52 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 53.5%* |
| 2010 | (Private) | 30 | 3.80 | Top 5% | African-American | 89.3% |
| 2010 | NJ | 30 | 3.71 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 66.2%* |
| 2010 | FL | 30 | 4.00 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 86.0%* |
| 2010 | RI | 29 | 3.89 | Top 5% | South Asian | 76.6%* |
| 2010 | CA | 29 | 3.48 | Top 25% | None Indicated | 55.0% |
| 2010 | CA | 29 | 3.78 | Top 25% | East Asian | 66.9% |
| 2010 | NY | 29 | 3.00 | Class Not Ranked | East Asian | 50.8% |
| 2010 | IL | 29 | 2.90 | Unknown | Caucasian | 12.8%* |
| 2010 | FL | 29 | 3.00 | Class Not Ranked | African-American | 68.4% |
| 2010 | GA | 28 | 3.90 | Unknown | Caucasian | 63.4%* |
| 2010 | OH | 28 | 3.50 | Class Not Ranked | African-American | 68.3%* |
| 2010 | IL | 28 | 3.50 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 32.4%* |
| 2010 | AL | 28 | 3.70 | Class Not Ranked | Other | 49.8%* |
| 2010 | FL | 28 | 3.60 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 15.9% |
| 2010 | CA | 27 | 3.43 | Top 30% | Caucasian | 12.4% |
| 2010 | NY | 26 | 3.00 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 100.0% |
| 2010 | WI | 20 | 3.20 | Bottom 50% | Caucasian | 0.6%* |
| 2009 | AL | 2400 | 4.00 | Valedictorian | Hispanic | 100.0% |
| 2009 | XX | 2400 | 4.00 | Top 1% | East Asian | 100.0% |
| 2009 | GA | 2400 | 4.00 | Top 1% | Caucasian | 99.4% |
| 2009 | TX | 2400 | 4.00 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 99.3% |
| 2009 | CT | 2380 | 3.80 | Top 5% | South Asian | 98.8% |
| 2009 | FL | 2330 | 3.40 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 97.0% |
| 2009 | NJ | 2330 | 3.96 | Top 10% | East Asian | 98.4% |
| 2009 | NJ | 2330 | 3.76 | Top 10% | Other | 71.9% |
| 2009 | NY | 2320 | 4.00 | Top 1% | Caucasian | 98.6% |
| 2009 | NJ | 2320 | 3.36 | Top 10% | South Asian | 94.6% |
| 2009 | NJ | 2320 | 3.52 | Class Not Ranked | Other | 66.3% |
| 2009 | DE | 2280 | 4.00 | Valedictorian | None Indicated | 100.0% |
| 2009 | CA | 2280 | 4.00 | Top 1% | Caucasian | 98.4% |
| 2009 | NE | 2270 | 4.00 | Valedictorian | South Asian | 98.8% |
| 2009 | NY | 2270 | 3.84 | Class Not Ranked | South Asian | 93.6% |
| 2009 | WA | 2270 | 3.89 | Top 10% | East Asian | 97.4% |
| 2009 | NY | 2260 | 3.75 | Top 1% | East Asian | 98.0% |
| 2009 | FL | 2260 | 3.90 | Top 1% | Caucasian | 96.3% |
| 2009 | CA | 2260 | 3.86 | Top 10% | East Asian | 94.0% |
| 2009 | NJ | 2260 | 3.60 | Class Not Ranked | South Asian | 93.6% |
| 2009 | NY | 2250 | 3.85 | Unknown | Caucasian | 97.4% |
| 2009 | XX | 2250 | 3.92 | Class Not Ranked | East Asian | 93.5% |
| 2009 | NY | 2240 | 4.00 | Top 1% | Caucasian | 95.8% |
| 2009 | CA | 2240 | 3.50 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 46.7% |
| 2009 | NJ | 2230 | 3.67 | Top 10% | South Asian | 95.7% |
| 2009 | NJ | 2230 | 3.56 | Top 10% | South Asian | 90.4% |
| 2009 | TX | 2210 | 3.50 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 88.7% |
| 2009 | IA | 2210 | 3.97 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 92.4%* |
| 2009 | MN | 2190 | 3.98 | Valedictorian | None Indicated | 98.0% |
| 2009 | CT | 2190 | 3.40 | Top 5% | East Asian | 88.0% |
| 2009 | CA | 2180 | 3.70 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 52.3% |
| 2009 | XX | 2180 | 3.00 | Top 10% | East Asian | 80.1% |
| 2009 | NJ | 2170 | 3.76 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 93.7% |
| 2009 | NY | 2170 | 3.82 | Class Not Ranked | East Asian | 94.4% |
| 2009 | PA | 2160 | 3.40 | Top 20% | Other | 89.0% |
| 2009 | CA | 2160 | 3.90 | Top 5% | South Asian | 94.2% |
| 2009 | CA | 2160 | 3.70 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 78.6% |
| 2009 | PA | 2160 | 3.50 | Top 30% | Caucasian | 81.4% |
| 2009 | PA | 2160 | 3.80 | Unknown | Caucasian | 85.0%* |
| 2009 | CA | 2150 | 3.05 | Class Not Ranked | South Asian | 77.5% |
| 2009 | KS | 2140 | 3.66 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 84.2% |
| 2009 | NJ | 2140 | 3.90 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 91.8% |
| 2009 | NJ | 2140 | 3.53 | Top 10% | East Asian | 100.0% |
| 2009 | GA | 2130 | 3.75 | Top 10% | African-American | 98.3%* |
| 2009 | CA | 2130 | 4.00 | Valedictorian | East Asian | 91.6% |
| 2009 | CA | 2120 | 3.93 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 85.0% |
| 2009 | PA | 2120 | 3.75 | Top 20% | Hispanic | 90.0% |
| 2009 | XX | 2120 | 3.98 | Class Not Ranked | East Asian | 91.2% |
| 2009 | FL | 2120 | 4.00 | Top 1% | Hispanic | 98.0%* |
| 2009 | OH | 2110 | 3.95 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 88.4% |
| 2009 | OH | 2110 | 3.95 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 87.2% |
| 2009 | CA | 2110 | 3.71 | Top 30% | East Asian | 80.9% |
| 2009 | NJ | 2110 | 3.50 | Top 30% | Caucasian | 78.9% |
| 2009 | GA | 2110 | 3.97 | Top 10% | East Asian | 89.6% |
| 2009 | NY | 2110 | 3.80 | Class Not Ranked | East Asian | 87.6% |
| 2009 | MA | 2110 | 3.50 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 68.8%* |
| 2009 | (Private) | 2110 | 3.81 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 80.1% |
| 2009 | CA | 2100 | 3.80 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 91.3% |
| 2009 | MN | 2100 | 3.40 | Top 30% | Caucasian | 71.9% |
| 2009 | NC | 2100 | 3.70 | Salutatorian | South Asian | 88.2% |
| 2009 | NJ | 2100 | 3.93 | Top 5% | South Asian | 92.9% |
| 2009 | NY | 2090 | 3.96 | Top 5% | South Asian | 83.4% |
| 2009 | VA | 2090 | 3.72 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 81.4%* |
| 2009 | NY | 2090 | 3.44 | Class Not Ranked | Middle-Eastern | 77.3% |
| 2009 | XX | 2080 | 3.77 | Top 5% | South Asian | 89.4% |
| 2009 | VA | 2080 | 3.80 | Top 5% | South Asian | 87.1% |
| 2009 | VA | 2080 | 3.66 | Unknown | East Asian | 79.6% |
| 2009 | NY | 2070 | 3.70 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 86.6% |
| 2009 | CA | 2070 | 3.61 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 65.9% |
| 2009 | CA | 2070 | 3.82 | Top 10% | East Asian | 91.8% |
| 2009 | PA | 2070 | 2.98 | Unknown | None Indicated | 63.8% |
| 2009 | DE | 2060 | 3.50 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 76.5% |
| 2009 | NJ | 2060 | 3.22 | Top 30% | East Asian | 61.4% |
| 2009 | CA | 2060 | 3.30 | Bottom 50% | South Asian | 3.7% |
| 2009 | NY | 2050 | 3.81 | Top 1% | East Asian | 90.2% |
| 2009 | NJ | 2040 | 3.71 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 69.7%* |
| 2009 | (Private) | 2040 | 3.20 | Class Not Ranked | South Asian | 62.6% |
| 2009 | PA | 2040 | 3.20 | Bottom 50% | Other | 14.6%* |
| 2009 | NJ | 2040 | 3.60 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 100.0% |
| 2009 | NY | 2030 | 3.70 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 76.8% |
| 2009 | MD | 2020 | 3.72 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 64.1%* |
| 2009 | (Private) | 2010 | 3.98 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 85.3%* |
| 2009 | XX | 2010 | 3.40 | Unknown | South Asian | 63.3% |
| 2009 | NY | 2000 | 4.00 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 96.5% |
| 2009 | CA | 2000 | 3.80 | Top 5% | East Asian | 69.1% |
| 2009 | GA | 2000 | 3.58 | Top 20% | East Asian | 52.3%* |
| 2009 | XX | 2000 | 3.60 | Class Not Ranked | South Asian | 57.8%* |
| 2009 | NY | 2000 | 3.50 | Top 10% | Hispanic | 92.5% |
| 2009 | NJ | 2000 | 3.20 | Bottom 40% | Caucasian | 8.8% |
| 2009 | SC | 1990 | 4.00 | Valedictorian | Caucasian | 93.6% |
| 2009 | FL | 1990 | 3.25 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 82.6% |
| 2009 | NJ | 1990 | 3.50 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 100.0% |
| 2009 | MA | 1980 | 3.20 | Class Not Ranked | East Asian | 55.4% |
| 2009 | NJ | 1980 | 3.76 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 100.0% |
| 2009 | FL | 1970 | 3.20 | Top 40% | Caucasian | 16.9%* |
| 2009 | AL | 1970 | 3.93 | Top 10% | East Asian | 76.7% |
| 2009 | NY | 1970 | 3.65 | Top 10% | East Asian | 100.0% |
| 2009 | NY | 1970 | 2.90 | Class Not Ranked | Hispanic | 68.6% |
| 2009 | CO | 1970 | 4.00 | Valedictorian | Hispanic | 92.1% |
| 2009 | CA | 1970 | 3.48 | Top 40% | East Asian | 33.7% |
| 2009 | (Private) | 1960 | 4.00 | Valedictorian | Hispanic | 96.1% |
| 2009 | XX | 1960 | 4.00 | Valedictorian | East Asian | 81.6% |
| 2009 | NJ | 1960 | 3.33 | Unknown | South Asian | 33.9%* |
| 2009 | CA | 1950 | 3.40 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 75.7% |
| 2009 | NJ | 1950 | 3.10 | Class Not Ranked | East Asian | 20.4%* |
| 2009 | CA | 1950 | 3.50 | Unknown | Caucasian | 38.0% |
| 2009 | FL | 1950 | 3.60 | Top 10% | East Asian | 66.9% |
| 2009 | NJ | 1950 | 3.80 | Top 10% | South Asian | 63.4% |
| 2009 | MA | 1950 | 3.51 | Unknown | South Asian | 44.7%* |
| 2009 | NJ | 1940 | 3.40 | Unknown | Caucasian | 34.6% |
| 2009 | CA | 1940 | 3.29 | Unknown | South Asian | 48.7% |
| 2009 | PA | 1940 | 3.44 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 36.2% |
| 2009 | FL | 1930 | 3.70 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 59.2%* |
| 2009 | RI | 1930 | 3.41 | Class Not Ranked | South Asian | 29.5% |
| 2009 | NY | 1930 | 3.50 | Class Not Ranked | South Asian | 10.5% |
| 2009 | TX | 1920 | 3.35 | Top 30% | Hispanic | 71.0% |
| 2009 | NY | 1910 | 3.60 | Class Not Ranked | Middle-Eastern | 10.0% |
| 2009 | NY | 1910 | 3.60 | Unknown | None Indicated | 42.8% |
| 2009 | NY | 1910 | 3.20 | Top 30% | Caucasian | 36.6% |
| 2009 | PA | 1910 | 3.80 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 52.9% |
| 2009 | PA | 1910 | 3.90 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 12.2% |
| 2009 | CA | 1900 | 3.88 | Top 10% | East Asian | 63.8% |
| 2009 | NY | 1900 | 3.94 | Top 5% | South Asian | 64.9% |
| 2009 | FL | 1890 | 3.04 | Top 10% | South Asian | 20.5% |
| 2009 | MA | 1890 | 3.20 | Top 10% | South Asian | 33.6% |
| 2009 | NY | 1890 | 3.72 | Top 10% | South Asian | 63.7% |
| 2009 | FL | 1890 | 4.00 | Top 5% | Hispanic | 78.0% |
| 2009 | NY | 1890 | 3.50 | Class Not Ranked | None Indicated | 44.3% |
| 2009 | NJ | 1890 | 3.80 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 30.4% |
| 2009 | CA | 1880 | 2.98 | Top 10% | East Asian | 23.9% |
| 2009 | XX | 1880 | 3.60 | Unknown | East Asian | 33.7% |
| 2009 | NJ | 1880 | 3.41 | Top 20% | East Asian | 3.6% |
| 2009 | MA | 1880 | 3.34 | Top 20% | East Asian | 23.2% |
| 2009 | CA | 1870 | 3.70 | Class Not Ranked | Hispanic | 72.1% |
| 2009 | MN | 1860 | 3.70 | Top 10% | East Asian | 73.7% |
| 2009 | NY | 1860 | 3.70 | Top 10% | East Asian | 60.1% |
| 2009 | MD | 1860 | 3.73 | Top 1% | African-American | 71.2% |
| 2009 | PA | 1860 | 3.85 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 60.2%* |
| 2009 | FL | 1860 | 4.00 | Unknown | Caucasian | 66.1%* |
| 2009 | CA | 1850 | 3.20 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 14.3%* |
| 2009 | PA | 1850 | 3.90 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 33.4% |
| 2009 | NC | 1850 | 3.95 | Top 10% | African-American | 78.3% |
| 2009 | NY | 1840 | 3.50 | Class Not Ranked | None Indicated | 100.0% |
| 2009 | AZ | 1830 | 4.00 | Top 1% | Caucasian | 72.6%* |
| 2009 | NJ | 1830 | 3.30 | Top 30% | East Asian | 10.9% |
| 2009 | CT | 1830 | 3.68 | Top 5% | South Asian | 38.6% |
| 2009 | NY | 1830 | 3.30 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 30.3% |
| 2009 | PA | 1830 | 3.84 | Top 5% | Hispanic | 68.6% |
| 2009 | CA | 1820 | 3.60 | Unknown | Hispanic | 70.7% |
| 2009 | VA | 1820 | 3.00 | Top 30% | Caucasian | 5.5%* |
| 2009 | TX | 1820 | 3.50 | Top 20% | Hispanic | 55.6%* |
| 2009 | XX | 1810 | 3.20 | Class Not Ranked | South Asian | 21.2% |
| 2009 | OH | 1800 | 3.26 | Top 30% | Caucasian | 9.7%* |
| 2009 | CT | 1790 | 3.00 | Top 30% | South Asian | 4.7%* |
| 2009 | XX | 1790 | 2.80 | Top 10% | African-American | 17.4%* |
| 2009 | NY | 1780 | 3.80 | Top 10% | Middle-Eastern | 48.5% |
| 2009 | NY | 1780 | 4.00 | Top 20% | South Asian | 45.0% |
| 2009 | CA | 1780 | 3.73 | Top 10% | Hispanic | 60.3% |
| 2009 | CA | 1770 | 3.83 | Class Not Ranked | African-American | 61.7% |
| 2009 | VA | 1770 | 2.75 | Bottom 40% | South Asian | 3.2% |
| 2009 | TX | 1760 | 3.50 | Class Not Ranked | Hispanic | 60.9%* |
| 2009 | NY | 1750 | 3.80 | Top 10% | East Asian | 66.8% |
| 2009 | AL | 1750 | 3.75 | Top 10% | African-American | 54.2% |
| 2009 | XX | 1750 | 3.20 | Top 30% | Caucasian | 10.5% |
| 2009 | XX | 1750 | 3.55 | Top 30% | East Asian | 20.8% |
| 2009 | CA | 1730 | 3.40 | Unknown | Hispanic | 25.5% |
| 2009 | ME | 1720 | 3.67 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 23.3%* |
| 2009 | NJ | 1720 | 3.70 | Unknown | Caucasian | 42.8% |
| 2009 | MI | 1710 | 3.30 | Top 10% | Middle-Eastern | 11.5% |
| 2009 | FL | 1700 | 3.65 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 99.9%* |
| 2009 | NJ | 1680 | 3.60 | Top 30% | South Asian | 12.6%* |
| 2009 | DC | 1680 | 2.60 | Unknown | Caucasian | 1.4%* |
| 2009 | NJ | 1650 | 3.50 | Top 20% | African-American | 99.6% |
| 2009 | NY | 1640 | 3.67 | Top 5% | Hispanic | 55.6%* |
| 2009 | NJ | 1620 | 3.55 | Top 10% | South Asian | 16.3% |
| 2009 | NC | 1600 | 3.50 | Top 10% | Hispanic | 49.8% |
| 2009 | XX | 1580 | 3.50 | Top 10% | East Asian | 11.1%* |
| 2009 | WA | 1500 | 3.30 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 4.4%* |
| 2009 | CA | 1470 | 3.81 | Top 10% | Hispanic | 26.4% |
| 2009 | NJ | 1450 | 3.30 | Top 40% | Middle-Eastern | 2.5% |
| 2009 | NY | 1310 | 3.40 | Top 20% | Hispanic | 16.9% |
| 2009 | NY | 1290 | 3.48 | Top 40% | African-American | 3.3%* |
| 2009 | MA | 1240 | 3.39 | Top 40% | Hispanic | 2.0%* |
| 2009 | NE | 34 | 4.00 | Valedictorian | East Asian | 97.5% |
| 2009 | MA | 33 | 3.60 | Top 20% | None Indicated | 86.1% |
| 2009 | NE | 33 | 3.90 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 92.5%* |
| 2009 | CT | 32 | 3.45 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 64.5%* |
| 2009 | CA | 32 | 3.78 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 90.8% |
| 2009 | FL | 32 | 3.90 | Top 1% | Caucasian | 91.1%* |
| 2009 | FL | 32 | 3.60 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 100.0%* |
| 2009 | TN | 30 | 3.79 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 67.4%* |
| 2009 | FL | 30 | 3.66 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 100.0% |
| 2009 | TX | 30 | 3.89 | Top 10% | South Asian | 77.2% |
| 2009 | NY | 29 | 3.75 | Top 5% | East Asian | 60.5% |
| 2009 | CA | 29 | 3.73 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 53.9% |
| 2009 | FL | 28 | 3.98 | Top 1% | Caucasian | 77.6%* |
| 2009 | NY | 28 | 3.40 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 99.9%* |
| 2009 | IL | 28 | 3.60 | Top 20% | None Indicated | 38.8%* |
| 2009 | AZ | 28 | 3.83 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 66.6%* |
| 2009 | IL | 28 | 3.50 | Top 20% | Hispanic | 64.6%* |
| 2009 | IL | 27 | 2.90 | Unknown | Caucasian | 7.1%* |
| 2009 | TX | 27 | 4.00 | Salutatorian | Hispanic | 100.0% |
| 2009 | MI | 27 | 3.20 | Unknown | Caucasian | 15.0%* |
| 2009 | NY | 26 | 3.76 | Top 1% | South Asian | 51.4%* |
| 2009 | IL | 25 | 3.43 | Top 10% | African-American | 43.1% |
| 2009 | IL | 25 | 2.40 | Class Not Ranked | African-American | 3.9%* |
| 2009 | TN | 25 | 3.70 | Top 30% | South Asian | 2.1% |
| 2009 | FL | 24 | 3.20 | Top 10% | African-American | 19.5% |
| 2009 | WA | 23 | 3.67 | Unknown | Other | 16.2%* |
| 2009 | MO | | 0.00 | Bottom 30% | African-American | 0.0%* |
| 2008 | NY | 2400 | 4.00 | Valedictorian | Caucasian | 98.4%* |
| 2008 | IN | 2400 | 3.90 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 99.4% |
| 2008 | NY | 2370 | 3.93 | Class Not Ranked | East Asian | 96.2%* |
| 2008 | VA | 2360 | 4.00 | Salutatorian | African-American | 99.5%* |
| 2008 | XX | 2330 | 3.80 | Unknown | South Asian | 93.5%* |
| 2008 | MS | 2320 | 3.70 | Unknown | Caucasian | 96.4% |
| 2008 | XX | 2310 | 4.00 | Top 5% | None Indicated | 98.5% |
| 2008 | PA | 2290 | 3.89 | Top 1% | Caucasian | 98.0% |
| 2008 | OH | 2280 | 4.00 | Salutatorian | East Asian | 97.8%* |
| 2008 | TN | 2260 | 4.00 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 98.6% |
| 2008 | CA | 2250 | 3.70 | Top 5% | East Asian | 95.6% |
| 2008 | CA | 2240 | 3.80 | Unknown | East Asian | 95.5% |
| 2008 | NJ | 2240 | 3.43 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 75.8%* |
| 2008 | MD | 2240 | 3.70 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 91.7% |
| 2008 | NY | 2230 | 3.80 | Top 10% | East Asian | 90.7%* |
| 2008 | VA | 2230 | 4.00 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 96.4% |
| 2008 | XX | 2230 | 3.50 | Class Not Ranked | Other | 94.2% |
| 2008 | CT | 2230 | 3.40 | Unknown | Caucasian | 73.0%* |
| 2008 | PA | 2220 | 3.90 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 94.8% |
| 2008 | XX | 2220 | 4.00 | Valedictorian | Other | 95.8% |
| 2008 | MD | 2220 | 3.75 | Unknown | Caucasian | 87.3%* |
| 2008 | MI | 2200 | 3.97 | Top 1% | South Asian | 94.8%* |
| 2008 | NJ | 2200 | 3.85 | Top 10% | East Asian | 93.9% |
| 2008 | MA | 2200 | 3.50 | Top 10% | East Asian | 86.6% |
| 2008 | PA | 2200 | 3.50 | Unknown | Caucasian | 75.2%* |
| 2008 | NY | 2190 | 3.90 | Top 5% | South Asian | 90.8% |
| 2008 | CA | 2190 | 3.22 | Unknown | South Asian | 56.9%* |
| 2008 | NY | 2190 | 3.80 | Class Not Ranked | South Asian | 87.0%* |
| 2008 | PA | 2180 | 3.40 | Unknown | None Indicated | 68.6%* |
| 2008 | NJ | 2180 | 4.00 | Valedictorian | Caucasian | 94.9%* |
| 2008 | CA | 2180 | 4.00 | Salutatorian | East Asian | 94.9%* |
| 2008 | TX | 2180 | 3.90 | Unknown | South Asian | 89.4%* |
| 2008 | VA | 2160 | 3.70 | Unknown | East Asian | 90.8% |
| 2008 | NH | 2160 | 3.40 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 61.1%* |
| 2008 | TN | 2150 | 3.90 | Top 10% | East Asian | 94.0%* |
| 2008 | CT | 2150 | 3.70 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 91.4%* |
| 2008 | XX | 2150 | 3.80 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 92.4% |
| 2008 | TN | 2140 | 4.00 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 98.1%* |
| 2008 | FL | 2140 | 3.75 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 52.9% |
| 2008 | NY | 2140 | 3.80 | Top 5% | South Asian | 94.0% |
| 2008 | MA | 2140 | 3.68 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 81.1%* |
| 2008 | NY | 2130 | 3.85 | Unknown | East Asian | 88.5%* |
| 2008 | NY | 2130 | 3.70 | Unknown | None Indicated | 75.4% |
| 2008 | NY | 2130 | 3.75 | Top 30% | None Indicated | 65.1% |
| 2008 | CA | 2130 | 3.95 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 92.6% |
| 2008 | NJ | 2130 | 3.40 | Top 10% | East Asian | 65.1%* |
| 2008 | CA | 2120 | 3.50 | Unknown | East Asian | 89.1% |
| 2008 | NJ | 2120 | 3.60 | Class Not Ranked | Other | 72.5%* |
| 2008 | IL | 2110 | 3.60 | Class Not Ranked | East Asian | 79.3%* |
| 2008 | CA | 2110 | 3.00 | Top 30% | Caucasian | 40.2% |
| 2008 | CA | 2100 | 3.30 | Top 40% | East Asian | 59.1% |
| 2008 | NJ | 2100 | 3.67 | Unknown | South Asian | 81.6% |
| 2008 | CA | 2090 | 3.85 | Class Not Ranked | East Asian | 77.3% |
| 2008 | NY | 2090 | 3.70 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 71.4%* |
| 2008 | MA | 2090 | 3.25 | Unknown | Caucasian | 62.1% |
| 2008 | NY | 2090 | 3.80 | Valedictorian | Caucasian | 86.6%* |
| 2008 | NY | 2080 | 3.70 | Class Not Ranked | None Indicated | 76.7% |
| 2008 | CA | 2080 | 3.95 | Unknown | East Asian | 87.9% |
| 2008 | CA | 2080 | 3.80 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 81.2%* |
| 2008 | XX | 2080 | 3.90 | Class Not Ranked | East Asian | 82.9%* |
| 2008 | NJ | 2070 | 3.50 | Unknown | None Indicated | 60.1%* |
| 2008 | FL | 2070 | 3.40 | Top 30% | None Indicated | 40.8%* |
| 2008 | NY | 2070 | 3.72 | Top 30% | None Indicated | 62.8%* |
| 2008 | NJ | 2070 | 3.70 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 81.2% |
| 2008 | (Private) | 2060 | 3.40 | Class Not Ranked | East Asian | 52.0%* |
| 2008 | PA | 2060 | 3.70 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 76.6% |
| 2008 | NY | 2060 | 3.80 | Valedictorian | Hispanic | 94.8% |
| 2008 | NY | 2060 | 3.60 | Unknown | African-American | 89.5% |
| 2008 | NC | 2050 | 3.80 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 73.6% |
| 2008 | XX | 2050 | 3.65 | Class Not Ranked | South Asian | 66.3% |
| 2008 | OH | 2050 | 4.00 | Top 5% | East Asian | 90.1% |
| 2008 | FL | 2040 | 3.70 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 71.1% |
| 2008 | CA | 2040 | 4.00 | Valedictorian | Middle-Eastern | 94.9% |
| 2008 | AK | 2040 | 3.75 | Top 1% | South Asian | 85.4% |
| 2008 | WV | 2030 | 3.60 | Top 10% | None Indicated | 70.2%* |
| 2008 | CA | 2020 | 3.00 | Class Not Ranked | None Indicated | 65.1% |
| 2008 | VA | 2010 | 3.30 | Unknown | Caucasian | 38.3%* |
| 2008 | CA | 2010 | 4.00 | Top 1% | Caucasian | 81.7% |
| 2008 | MD | 2010 | 3.80 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 77.9%* |
| 2008 | NY | 2010 | 3.65 | Unknown | Caucasian | 62.3%* |
| 2008 | NY | 2010 | 4.00 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 78.8%* |
| 2008 | MA | 1990 | 3.40 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 37.4% |
| 2008 | NY | 1990 | 3.80 | Top 10% | East Asian | 85.2% |
| 2008 | VA | 1990 | 3.90 | Unknown | None Indicated | 74.8%* |
| 2008 | XX | 1990 | 3.64 | Unknown | East Asian | 58.9%* |
| 2008 | NY | 1980 | 3.50 | Top 10% | Hispanic | 87.7% |
| 2008 | NJ | 1980 | 3.00 | Unknown | Caucasian | 39.1% |
| 2008 | VA | 1980 | 3.60 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 50.8%* |
| 2008 | CA | 1980 | 3.26 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 28.5%* |
| 2008 | SC | 1970 | 3.90 | Top 5% | South Asian | 86.6%* |
| 2008 | NY | 1970 | 4.00 | Top 5% | South Asian | 83.3%* |
| 2008 | NY | 1970 | 3.60 | Top 20% | East Asian | 49.6%* |
| 2008 | NY | 1960 | 3.80 | Top 1% | Hispanic | 90.7% |
| 2008 | VA | 1960 | 3.40 | Class Not Ranked | None Indicated | 38.4%* |
| 2008 | NJ | 1950 | 3.60 | Top 30% | Caucasian | 69.1% |
| 2008 | FL | 1950 | 3.30 | Top 10% | Hispanic | 85.5% |
| 2008 | NY | 1950 | 3.58 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 45.4%* |
| 2008 | NY | 1950 | 3.40 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 33.4%* |
| 2008 | CA | 1940 | 3.30 | Class Not Ranked | Native American | 65.1% |
| 2008 | VA | 1940 | 3.30 | Unknown | Other | 28.6% |
| 2008 | FL | 1940 | 3.98 | Top 10% | East Asian | 80.8% |
| 2008 | NY | 1940 | 3.70 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 52.5%* |
| 2008 | CA | 1930 | 3.40 | Unknown | Other | 45.1%* |
| 2008 | PA | 1930 | 3.80 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 47.2% |
| 2008 | MA | 1930 | 3.60 | Top 5% | Middle-Eastern | 56.4%* |
| 2008 | CT | 1920 | 3.60 | Unknown | Hispanic | 77.0%* |
| 2008 | NY | 1910 | 3.70 | Top 10% | African-American | 83.3%* |
| 2008 | NJ | 1910 | 3.79 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 54.7%* |
| 2008 | HI | 1900 | 3.34 | Unknown | East Asian | 43.9% |
| 2008 | NY | 1890 | 3.70 | Top 10% | None Indicated | 54.0%* |
| 2008 | FL | 1880 | 3.90 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 93.2% |
| 2008 | FL | 1870 | 3.25 | Top 20% | South Asian | 19.0% |
| 2008 | NJ | 1870 | 3.80 | Top 5% | East Asian | 46.8% |
| 2008 | CT | 1870 | 3.85 | Top 5% | East Asian | 65.3%* |
| 2008 | NJ | 1870 | 3.60 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 36.1%* |
| 2008 | NY | 1860 | 3.80 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 48.5%* |
| 2008 | CO | 1860 | 4.00 | Valedictorian | Caucasian | 76.3%* |
| 2008 | MD | 1820 | 3.40 | Top 20% | Other | 26.8% |
| 2008 | CA | 1820 | 3.25 | Unknown | Other | 16.2%* |
| 2008 | KS | 1800 | 3.70 | Top 30% | Caucasian | 26.9%* |
| 2008 | NY | 1790 | 3.20 | Top 30% | East Asian | 8.0%* |
| 2008 | CA | 1780 | 3.72 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 34.6% |
| 2008 | CA | 1780 | 3.50 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 20.8%* |
| 2008 | NY | 1770 | 3.80 | Top 10% | African-American | 54.7% |
| 2008 | MA | 1760 | 3.70 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 32.1% |
| 2008 | NJ | 1760 | 3.74 | Top 20% | South Asian | 26.6% |
| 2008 | CO | 1730 | 3.61 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 21.5%* |
| 2008 | CA | 1730 | 2.84 | Bottom 40% | South Asian | 2.5% |
| 2008 | NY | 1720 | 3.86 | Top 20% | Other | 40.1% |
| 2008 | NY | 1720 | 3.75 | Top 5% | Hispanic | 70.5%* |
| 2008 | CA | 1710 | 3.70 | Top 10% | South Asian | 39.8%* |
| 2008 | MA | 1710 | 3.45 | Top 10% | Other | 36.6% |
| 2008 | MA | 1710 | 3.50 | Top 20% | Other | 25.5% |
| 2008 | NY | 1710 | 3.00 | Unknown | African-American | 16.7%* |
| 2008 | NY | 1680 | 3.40 | Unknown | Caucasian | 12.0%* |
| 2008 | NJ | 1650 | 4.00 | Unknown | Hispanic | 53.8% |
| 2008 | NY | 1600 | 3.78 | Top 1% | Caucasian | 24.1% |
| 2008 | CA | 1580 | 3.00 | Unknown | East Asian | 2.5%* |
| 2008 | TX | 1200 | 3.97 | Top 1% | Hispanic | 76.1% |
| 2008 | VA | 35 | 3.75 | Unknown | Caucasian | 92.9%* |
| 2008 | IL | 34 | 3.80 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 95.8% |
| 2008 | CA | 34 | 4.00 | Class Not Ranked | South Asian | 97.0% |
| 2008 | NJ | 34 | 3.50 | Unknown | African-American | 94.3%* |
| 2008 | IL | 33 | 4.00 | Valedictorian | Caucasian | 95.1%* |
| 2008 | CA | 32 | 3.50 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 87.1% |
| 2008 | GA | 32 | 4.00 | Top 1% | Middle-Eastern | 95.3% |
| 2008 | GA | 32 | 4.00 | Valedictorian | Caucasian | 90.7% |
| 2008 | CA | 32 | 4.00 | Salutatorian | Caucasian | 93.3%* |
| 2008 | IL | 32 | 3.50 | Unknown | Middle-Eastern | 67.6%* |
| 2008 | KY | 31 | 4.00 | Valedictorian | Caucasian | 90.7% |
| 2008 | WI | 31 | 3.87 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 83.4%* |
| 2008 | NY | 31 | 4.00 | Unknown | Caucasian | 85.9%* |
| 2008 | NJ | 31 | 3.65 | Top 10% | East Asian | 73.1%* |
| 2008 | CA | 30 | 3.83 | Unknown | East Asian | 75.8% |
| 2008 | NY | 30 | 3.50 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 47.9%* |
| 2008 | FL | 28 | 3.70 | Top 5% | None Indicated | 69.0% |
| 2008 | NJ | 28 | 3.84 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 46.8% |
| 2008 | MN | 27 | 3.70 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 38.9% |
| 2008 | CO | 24 | 3.86 | Top 30% | Hispanic | 51.2%* |
| 2008 | (Private) | 22 | 3.50 | Unknown | African-American | 24.8%* |
| 2008 | NJ | 18 | 3.50 | Unknown | Caucasian | 2.3%* |
| 2007 | NY | 2340 | 3.97 | Class Not Ranked | None Indicated | 96.1%* |
| 2007 | CA | 2200 | 3.75 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 92.4%* |
| 2007 | OH | 2200 | 3.95 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 91.5%* |
| 2007 | NJ | 2200 | 4.00 | Salutatorian | South Asian | 95.3%* |
| 2007 | NJ | 2190 | 3.74 | Top 30% | East Asian | 77.4%* |
| 2007 | MA | 2180 | 3.33 | Unknown | South Asian | 63.1%* |
| 2007 | NY | 2160 | 4.00 | Top 10% | East Asian | 92.2%* |
| 2007 | CO | 2120 | 3.80 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 84.5%* |
| 2007 | NJ | 2110 | 3.60 | Unknown | East Asian | 71.1%* |
| 2007 | NY | 2100 | 3.85 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 84.8%* |
| 2007 | XX | 2100 | 3.61 | Unknown | East Asian | 70.7%* |
| 2007 | NY | 2060 | 3.00 | Unknown | Caucasian | 27.1%* |
| 2007 | TX | 2050 | 4.00 | Top 1% | South Asian | 89.7%* |
| 2007 | NY | 2040 | 3.68 | Top 20% | None Indicated | 67.8%* |
| 2007 | AZ | 2040 | 3.82 | Top 10% | East Asian | 78.7%* |
| 2007 | NY | 2020 | 3.83 | Unknown | Caucasian | 74.2%* |
| 2007 | NY | 2000 | 3.80 | Top 20% | Hispanic | 88.5%* |
| 2007 | PA | 1960 | 3.50 | Unknown | East Asian | 45.2%* |
| 2007 | FL | 1950 | 3.70 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 61.9%* |
| 2007 | TX | 1910 | 3.36 | Top 30% | South Asian | 20.6%* |
| 2007 | CA | 1900 | 3.80 | Unknown | None Indicated | 57.9%* |
| 2007 | FL | 1890 | 3.50 | Top 10% | Hispanic | 71.8%* |
| 2007 | XX | 1880 | 3.70 | Top 20% | None Indicated | 44.4%* |
| 2007 | FL | 1880 | 3.56 | Top 20% | South Asian | 35.1%* |
| 2007 | IL | 1860 | 3.90 | Top 20% | Other | 59.5%* |
| 2007 | CA | 1770 | 3.83 | Top 20% | East Asian | 38.6%* |
| 2007 | XX | 1760 | 3.00 | Top 20% | South Asian | 5.5%* |
| 2007 | OR | 1740 | 3.81 | Top 5% | East Asian | 51.6%* |
| 2007 | CA | 1720 | 3.70 | Top 10% | None Indicated | 31.6%* |
| 2007 | WA | 1720 | 3.50 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 18.3%* |
| 2007 | PA | 1640 | 3.10 | Unknown | None Indicated | 4.6%* |
| 2007 | MD | 1540 | 3.91 | Top 10% | Other | 24.4%* |
| 2007 | NY | 1200 | 3.70 | Unknown | East Asian | 37.8%* |
| 2007 | NY | 34 | 3.70 | Unknown | East Asian | 88.4%* |
| 2007 | CA | 28 | 3.73 | Top 5% | East Asian | 60.1%* |
| 2006 | GA | 2140 | 3.65 | Class Not Ranked | East Asian | 76.9%* |
| 2006 | CT | 2130 | 3.90 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 89.9%* |
| 2006 | CT | 1970 | 3.57 | Top 10% | East Asian | 61.0%* |
| 2006 | NJ | 1640 | 3.97 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 39.2%* |
| 2006 | AR | 31 | 3.30 | Top 30% | Caucasian | 34.3%* |
| 2005 | GA | 2070 | 3.49 | Unknown | None Indicated | 59.4%* |
| 0 | | 29 | 3.85 | Unknown | | 67.6%* |
|
| 2012 | TX | 2400 | 4.00 | Valedictorian | African-American | 99.9% |
| 2012 | XX | 2400 | 3.90 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 97.7% |
| 2012 | (Private) | 2400 | 3.10 | Unknown | East Asian | 72.5% |
| 2012 | TX | 2390 | 3.50 | Top 5% | African-American | 99.4% |
| 2012 | CT | 2370 | 3.70 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 97.9% |
| 2012 | PA | 2370 | 3.95 | Top 4% | Caucasian | 98.2% |
| 2012 | MD | 2360 | 4.00 | Salutatorian | Caucasian | 95.3% |
| 2012 | (Private) | 2350 | 3.90 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 95.5%* |
| 2012 | (Private) | 2340 | 2.90 | Bottom 50% | Hispanic | 94.3% |
| 2012 | XX | 2320 | 4.00 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 91.6% |
| 2012 | NJ | 2310 | 3.50 | Top 10% | Other | 86.8%* |
| 2012 | CA | 2310 | 4.00 | Top 3% | East Asian | 98.7% |
| 2012 | CA | 2300 | 4.00 | Class Not Ranked | African-American | 100.0% |
| 2012 | IL | 2300 | 3.45 | Top 40% | East Asian | 66.6%* |
| 2012 | CA | 2300 | 3.88 | Class Not Ranked | East Asian | 97.2% |
| 2012 | XX | 2300 | 3.72 | Top 2% | Caucasian | 95.7% |
| 2012 | MD | 2290 | 3.66 | Valedictorian | Caucasian | 94.9% |
| 2012 | AZ | 2290 | 3.72 | Class Not Ranked | East Asian | 90.2%* |
| 2012 | GA | 2280 | 4.00 | Unknown | Caucasian | 95.0%* |
| 2012 | NC | 2280 | 3.75 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 93.0%* |
| 2012 | OH | 2280 | 4.00 | Valedictorian | Caucasian | 99.0% |
| 2012 | FL | 2280 | 3.60 | Unknown | Caucasian | 86.2%* |
| 2012 | FL | 2270 | 3.80 | Top 15% | Caucasian | 91.2%* |
| 2012 | LA | 2260 | 4.00 | Valedictorian | Caucasian | 96.7%* |
| 2012 | MD | 2260 | 4.00 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 95.9% |
| 2012 | GA | 2250 | 3.50 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 77.2%* |
| 2012 | ID | 2250 | 3.90 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 93.6%* |
| 2012 | CA | 2250 | 3.90 | Top 2% | Caucasian | 95.0%* |
| 2012 | IL | 2240 | 3.50 | Class Not Ranked | East Asian | 79.2%* |
| 2012 | MD | 2230 | 3.80 | Unknown | Caucasian | 91.0%* |
| 2012 | MD | 2220 | 4.00 | Top 1% | Caucasian | 95.0% |
| 2012 | NJ | 2210 | 3.70 | Class Not Ranked | South Asian | 93.2% |
| 2012 | IL | 2200 | 3.20 | Top 15% | Caucasian | 56.8%* |
| 2012 | FL | 2200 | 4.00 | Unknown | Native American | 97.9%* |
| 2012 | FL | 2200 | 3.50 | Unknown | Caucasian | 75.2%* |
| 2012 | CT | 2190 | 3.30 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 91.1% |
| 2012 | CA | 2190 | 3.60 | Top 35% | East Asian | 81.5% |
| 2012 | TX | 2190 | 3.60 | Top 15% | South Asian | 79.3%* |
| 2012 | GA | 2180 | 3.80 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 88.3%* |
| 2012 | CA | 2180 | 3.76 | Top 10% | Hispanic | 97.6% |
| 2012 | MA | 2170 | 3.60 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 77.3%* |
| 2012 | NY | 2160 | 3.85 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 50.0% |
| 2012 | CA | 2160 | 3.60 | Unknown | Caucasian | 76.5%* |
| 2012 | CA | 2150 | 3.60 | Unknown | Caucasian | 75.6%* |
| 2012 | FL | 2140 | 3.30 | Top 25% | Hispanic | 77.3%* |
| 2012 | CA | 2140 | 3.78 | Top 1% | South Asian | 87.8% |
| 2012 | NY | 2140 | 3.30 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 79.9% |
| 2012 | PA | 2130 | 3.90 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 88.3%* |
| 2012 | VA | 2120 | 3.80 | Top 5% | East Asian | 39.2% |
| 2012 | FL | 2120 | 3.70 | Top 3% | Caucasian | 83.9%* |
| 2012 | NJ | 2110 | 3.60 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 71.1%* |
| 2012 | NJ | 2100 | 3.90 | Top 15% | Caucasian | 84.4%* |
| 2012 | CA | 2100 | 3.90 | Top 5% | South Asian | 95.0% |
| 2012 | MA | 2100 | 3.50 | Unknown | Caucasian | 64.0% |
| 2012 | CA | 2100 | 3.80 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 82.9%* |
| 2012 | FL | 2100 | 3.60 | Top 10% | Middle-Eastern | 73.5%* |
| 2012 | CT | 2100 | 3.80 | Top 10% | East Asian | 33.6% |
| 2012 | NY | 2090 | 3.40 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 61.2%* |
| 2012 | MD | 2090 | 3.30 | Unknown | Caucasian | 49.1%* |
| 2012 | NJ | 2090 | 3.68 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 76.8%* |
| 2012 | CA | 2090 | 4.00 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 89.0%* |
| 2012 | NJ | 2080 | 3.10 | Unknown | Caucasian | 34.1%* |
| 2012 | NY | 2080 | 3.30 | Unknown | East Asian | 62.6% |
| 2012 | MI | 2050 | 3.90 | Unknown | Caucasian | 80.5%* |
| 2012 | NJ | 2050 | 4.00 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 100.0%* |
| 2012 | MA | 2050 | 3.40 | Top 30% | Caucasian | 99.9%* |
| 2012 | NY | 2050 | 4.00 | Bottom 50% | African-American | 84.1% |
| 2012 | TX | 2040 | 3.92 | Top 25% | East Asian | 74.8%* |
| 2012 | NY | 2030 | 3.50 | Class Not Ranked | African-American | 85.1%* |
| 2012 | CA | 2010 | 3.80 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 68.9% |
| 2012 | FL | 2010 | 3.75 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 75.4%* |
| 2012 | MD | 2000 | 3.80 | Top 10% | East Asian | 39.7% |
| 2012 | CA | 2000 | 4.00 | Top 2% | African-American | 96.1%* |
| 2012 | NC | 2000 | 3.70 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 64.4%* |
| 2012 | TX | 1990 | 3.56 | Top 10% | Hispanic | 83.8%* |
| 2012 | NJ | 1980 | 3.60 | Top 20% | East Asian | 52.4% |
| 2012 | CT | 1980 | 3.90 | Top 3% | South Asian | 80.9%* |
| 2012 | VA | 1980 | 3.85 | Top 15% | Caucasian | 71.1%* |
| 2012 | NJ | 1930 | 3.71 | Class Not Ranked | South Asian | 55.8%* |
| 2012 | TX | 1920 | 3.87 | Top 4% | Caucasian | 73.1%* |
| 2012 | NJ | 1920 | 3.80 | Unknown | Hispanic | 85.4%* |
| 2012 | NH | 1920 | 3.68 | Top 15% | Hispanic | 80.8%* |
| 2012 | PA | 1910 | 3.40 | Top 30% | East Asian | 22.5%* |
| 2012 | OH | 1900 | 3.60 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 66.6%* |
| 2012 | CT | 1900 | 3.80 | Top 15% | Caucasian | 64.5%* |
| 2012 | FL | 1900 | 3.00 | Unknown | Caucasian | 12.8%* |
| 2012 | PA | 1900 | 3.62 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 51.0% |
| 2012 | NY | 1890 | 3.30 | Bottom 50% | South Asian | 99.6%* |
| 2012 | PA | 1880 | 3.70 | Bottom 50% | East Asian | 37.1%* |
| 2012 | PA | 1870 | 4.00 | Top 1% | Caucasian | 78.6%* |
| 2012 | KS | 1870 | 4.00 | Valedictorian | East Asian | 77.2%* |
| 2012 | FL | 1820 | 3.17 | Unknown | Hispanic | 54.3%* |
| 2012 | PA | 1810 | 3.20 | Class Not Ranked | Hispanic | 37.5%* |
| 2012 | CA | 1800 | 4.00 | Top 5% | Native American | 88.2%* |
| 2012 | PA | 1790 | 3.50 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 21.9%* |
| 2012 | PA | 1780 | 4.00 | Top 1% | South Asian | 66.7%* |
| 2012 | GA | 1750 | 4.00 | Unknown | South Asian | 51.6%* |
| 2012 | CA | 1750 | 3.60 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 25.8%* |
| 2012 | NJ | 1700 | 3.10 | Top 20% | Hispanic | 17.6%* |
| 2012 | CA | 1670 | 3.76 | Top 30% | East Asian | 24.1% |
| 2012 | FL | 1660 | 3.50 | Unknown | Caucasian | 13.9%* |
| 2012 | XX | 1600 | 3.15 | Unknown | African-American | 14.3%* |
| 2012 | NY | 1590 | 3.60 | Top 5% | East Asian | 31.7% |
| 2012 | MD | 1440 | 3.21 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 2.5%* |
| 2012 | CT | 1000 | 3.00 | Unknown | African-American | 6.0%* |
| 2012 | FL | 600 | 4.00 | Top 2% | East Asian | 0.3%* |
| 2012 | CA | 35 | 3.75 | Top 20% | South Asian | 97.7% |
| 2012 | XX | 34 | 3.70 | Top 25% | East Asian | 47.6% |
| 2012 | MI | 33 | 3.40 | Unknown | Caucasian | 68.6%* |
| 2012 | MI | 32 | 3.80 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 82.9%* |
| 2012 | IN | 32 | 3.86 | Top 4% | Other | 89.2%* |
| 2012 | WI | 31 | 3.96 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 86.6%* |
| 2012 | UT | 31 | 3.78 | Top 25% | Caucasian | 70.2%* |
| 2012 | TX | 30 | 3.50 | Top 3% | Hispanic | 86.1%* |
| 2012 | XX | 30 | 3.75 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 68.6%* |
| 2012 | LA | 30 | 3.90 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 76.9%* |
| 2012 | VA | 30 | 4.00 | Unknown | Caucasian | 81.5%* |
| 2012 | MA | 30 | 3.70 | Top 15% | Caucasian | 65.6%* |
| 2012 | KS | 28 | 3.55 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 35.5%* |
| 2012 | AZ | 27 | 3.50 | Top 40% | Hispanic | 40.2%* |
| 2012 | FL | 25 | 3.23 | Unknown | Caucasian | 9.8%* |
| 2012 | NC | 25 | 3.20 | Unknown | African-American | 27.5%* |
| 2012 | NJ | 22 | 2.00 | Unknown | Caucasian | 0.1%* |
| 2011 | CA | 2400 | 3.80 | Class Not Ranked | East Asian | 99.1% |
| 2011 | (Private) | 2400 | 3.30 | Top 15% | East Asian | 94.6% |
| 2011 | CA | 2400 | 3.80 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 98.4% |
| 2011 | LA | 2400 | 4.00 | Valedictorian | Caucasian | 98.8% |
| 2011 | IA | 2400 | 4.00 | Valedictorian | Caucasian | 100.0% |
| 2011 | IL | 2400 | 3.30 | Class Not Ranked | South Asian | 94.6% |
| 2011 | CA | 2400 | 4.00 | Top 10% | South Asian | 98.8% |
| 2011 | XX | 2400 | 4.00 | Class Not Ranked | South Asian | 97.3%* |
| 2011 | NC | 2400 | 4.00 | Valedictorian | South Asian | 98.4%* |
| 2011 | MD | 2400 | 3.86 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 100.0% |
| 2011 | XX | 2400 | 4.00 | Valedictorian | Caucasian | 100.0% |
| 2011 | XX | 2390 | 4.00 | Valedictorian | East Asian | 99.6% |
| 2011 | (Private) | 2390 | 4.00 | Class Not Ranked | East Asian | 99.3% |
| 2011 | CA | 2380 | 4.00 | Valedictorian | Caucasian | 93.7% |
| 2011 | NY | 2370 | 3.60 | Unknown | Caucasian | 95.6% |
| 2011 | PA | 2370 | 4.00 | Top 1% | Caucasian | 99.5% |
| 2011 | CA | 2370 | 4.00 | Top 3% | Caucasian | 98.8% |
| 2011 | (Private) | 2370 | 3.60 | Top 20% | East Asian | 96.5% |
| 2011 | NY | 2360 | 3.80 | Bottom 40% | East Asian | 95.3% |
| 2011 | AZ | 2360 | 4.00 | Valedictorian | East Asian | 99.6% |
| 2011 | CA | 2360 | 3.70 | Top 5% | South Asian | 96.9% |
| 2011 | NY | 2360 | 3.80 | Valedictorian | Native American | 99.5% |
| 2011 | CA | 2350 | 3.70 | Class Not Ranked | South Asian | 97.2% |
| 2011 | XX | 2350 | 3.51 | Class Not Ranked | Hispanic | 99.2% |
| 2011 | NY | 2350 | 4.00 | Top 15% | South Asian | 96.9% |
| 2011 | MD | 2350 | 3.76 | Top 20% | East Asian | 97.2% |
| 2011 | NJ | 2340 | 4.00 | Class Not Ranked | East Asian | 98.9% |
| 2011 | FL | 2330 | 3.90 | Top 1% | Hispanic | 99.4% |
| 2011 | CA | 2330 | 2.90 | Top 10% | East Asian | 91.4% |
| 2011 | CA | 2330 | 3.50 | Class Not Ranked | Middle-Eastern | 86.2%* |
| 2011 | NJ | 2320 | 3.80 | Class Not Ranked | East Asian | 93.1%* |
| 2011 | NY | 2320 | 4.00 | Top 1% | East Asian | 99.2% |
| 2011 | NY | 2310 | 3.90 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 98.1% |
| 2011 | TX | 2300 | 3.66 | Top 15% | South Asian | 96.6% |
| 2011 | CA | 2300 | 3.90 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 96.2% |
| 2011 | CA | 2300 | 3.75 | Top 5% | East Asian | 95.7% |
| 2011 | CA | 2300 | 4.00 | Top 5% | South Asian | 97.9% |
| 2011 | XX | 2300 | 4.00 | Top 10% | None Indicated | 98.9% |
| 2011 | MA | 2300 | 3.60 | Top 15% | Caucasian | 80.1% |
| 2011 | MA | 2300 | 3.10 | Class Not Ranked | South Asian | 63.3%* |
| 2011 | CA | 2300 | 3.96 | Class Not Ranked | East Asian | 95.9% |
| 2011 | NY | 2300 | 3.00 | Top 35% | East Asian | 81.2% |
| 2011 | NY | 2300 | 3.90 | Top 10% | South Asian | 96.0% |
| 2011 | CA | 2290 | 4.00 | Class Not Ranked | East Asian | 97.1% |
| 2011 | NY | 2290 | 3.90 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 97.0% |
| 2011 | WA | 2280 | 3.96 | Top 1% | Caucasian | 73.3% |
| 2011 | NY | 2280 | 3.68 | Top 10% | None Indicated | 95.2% |
| 2011 | TX | 2280 | 3.63 | Top 15% | South Asian | 91.4% |
| 2011 | MD | 2280 | 3.60 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 86.2%* |
| 2011 | CA | 2270 | 3.40 | Unknown | Caucasian | 77.3%* |
| 2011 | MN | 2270 | 3.62 | Class Not Ranked | African-American | 96.0%* |
| 2011 | FL | 2270 | 3.44 | Top 15% | Caucasian | 90.8% |
| 2011 | CA | 2270 | 3.80 | Class Not Ranked | East Asian | 95.5% |
| 2011 | CA | 2270 | 3.92 | Unknown | East Asian | 93.6%* |
| 2011 | NY | 2270 | 4.00 | Top 10% | South Asian | 95.6% |
| 2011 | NJ | 2270 | 3.91 | Top 5% | East Asian | 97.3% |
| 2011 | NJ | 2270 | 3.90 | Class Not Ranked | South Asian | 94.3% |
| 2011 | CA | 2260 | 3.94 | Top 5% | East Asian | 97.5% |
| 2011 | MD | 2260 | 3.80 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 93.9% |
| 2011 | NJ | 2260 | 4.00 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 98.4% |
| 2011 | XX | 2260 | 3.70 | Class Not Ranked | Other | 90.7% |
| 2011 | NJ | 2260 | 3.70 | Top 15% | Middle-Eastern | 91.5% |
| 2011 | TX | 2260 | 3.92 | Top 2% | South Asian | 95.6% |
| 2011 | XX | 2260 | 3.44 | Top 2% | East Asian | 96.6% |
| 2011 | IL | 2250 | 3.70 | Valedictorian | Caucasian | 92.1%* |
| 2011 | NY | 2250 | 3.90 | Top 5% | South Asian | 97.4% |
| 2011 | NE | 2250 | 3.93 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 94.0% |
| 2011 | XX | 2250 | 3.00 | Top 10% | South Asian | 41.3% |
| 2011 | XX | 2250 | 3.75 | Top 10% | None Indicated | 93.5% |
| 2011 | (Private) | 2250 | 4.00 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 93.6% |
| 2011 | XX | 2250 | 3.71 | Top 3% | East Asian | 96.5% |
| 2011 | MD | 2250 | 4.00 | Top 1% | South Asian | 98.6% |
| 2011 | CA | 2250 | 3.60 | Unknown | Caucasian | 95.4% |
| 2011 | NJ | 2250 | 3.85 | Top 15% | Caucasian | 92.1% |
| 2011 | NJ | 2250 | 3.00 | Top 20% | East Asian | 45.6%* |
| 2011 | PA | 2240 | 3.90 | Top 15% | Caucasian | 58.1% |
| 2011 | (Private) | 2240 | 3.76 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 96.6% |
| 2011 | TX | 2230 | 3.75 | Class Not Ranked | Hispanic | 94.0% |
| 2011 | CA | 2230 | 4.00 | Class Not Ranked | East Asian | 96.1% |
| 2011 | CA | 2230 | 3.80 | Unknown | Caucasian | 16.4% |
| 2011 | MD | 2230 | 3.60 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 89.2% |
| 2011 | CA | 2230 | 3.72 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 91.9% |
| 2011 | FL | 2230 | 3.60 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 80.0%* |
| 2011 | OH | 2220 | 3.82 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 94.6% |
| 2011 | CA | 2220 | 4.00 | Top 1% | Caucasian | 94.6% |
| 2011 | CA | 2220 | 3.90 | Top 3% | None Indicated | 97.0% |
| 2011 | CA | 2220 | 4.00 | Top 3% | East Asian | 96.9% |
| 2011 | OR | 2220 | 3.70 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 85.6%* |
| 2011 | TX | 2220 | 4.00 | Top 5% | Native American | 98.7%* |
| 2011 | CA | 2220 | 3.71 | Class Not Ranked | East Asian | 94.2% |
| 2011 | XX | 2220 | 3.51 | Top 20% | African-American | 91.8%* |
| 2011 | XX | 2220 | 3.50 | Top 5% | East Asian | 82.6%* |
| 2011 | GA | 2210 | 3.80 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 91.3%* |
| 2011 | VA | 2210 | 3.98 | Valedictorian | Caucasian | 95.4%* |
| 2011 | VA | 2210 | 3.85 | Valedictorian | Caucasian | 93.5%* |
| 2011 | PA | 2210 | 3.85 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 92.3%* |
| 2011 | NY | 2200 | 3.50 | Unknown | Caucasian | 81.3%* |
| 2011 | CA | 2200 | 3.80 | Bottom 50% | Caucasian | 86.9% |
| 2011 | NY | 2200 | 3.80 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 93.4% |
| 2011 | XX | 2200 | 3.60 | Class Not Ranked | East Asian | 33.5% |
| 2011 | AZ | 2200 | 4.00 | Salutatorian | Caucasian | 95.3%* |
| 2011 | CA | 2200 | 3.70 | Top 25% | East Asian | 83.7% |
| 2011 | CA | 2200 | 3.50 | Unknown | South Asian | 75.2%* |
| 2011 | CA | 2200 | 3.94 | Top 1% | East Asian | 97.0% |
| 2011 | NJ | 2200 | 3.64 | Class Not Ranked | South Asian | 93.3% |
| 2011 | MN | 2200 | 3.30 | Top 30% | African-American | 87.2% |
| 2011 | NJ | 2200 | 4.00 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 91.7% |
| 2011 | MI | 2190 | 4.00 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 93.4% |
| 2011 | FL | 2190 | 3.90 | Valedictorian | South Asian | 93.0% |
| 2011 | NV | 2190 | 4.00 | Top 5% | East Asian | 94.2%* |
| 2011 | MA | 2190 | 3.99 | Top 2% | Other | 94.6%* |
| 2011 | CA | 2190 | 4.00 | Top 1% | East Asian | 94.1% |
| 2011 | CA | 2190 | 3.80 | Top 10% | South Asian | 89.1% |
| 2011 | WA | 2190 | 4.00 | Valedictorian | East Asian | 94.7% |
| 2011 | PA | 2190 | 3.76 | Top 2% | None Indicated | 94.7% |
| 2011 | (Private) | 2190 | 3.80 | Top 35% | Caucasian | 77.4%* |
| 2011 | NY | 2190 | 3.90 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 92.1% |
| 2011 | MS | 2180 | 4.00 | Valedictorian | Caucasian | 95.1%* |
| 2011 | CA | 2180 | 3.90 | Top 10% | South Asian | 90.9%* |
| 2011 | OH | 2180 | 4.00 | Salutatorian | Caucasian | 97.0% |
| 2011 | CA | 2180 | 3.28 | Top 10% | South Asian | 82.8% |
| 2011 | NY | 2180 | 3.60 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 78.5%* |
| 2011 | OH | 2180 | 3.63 | Class Not Ranked | Hispanic | 93.8%* |
| 2011 | NJ | 2180 | 3.60 | Class Not Ranked | East Asian | 78.5%* |
| 2011 | MD | 2180 | 3.33 | Unknown | South Asian | 79.4% |
| 2011 | PA | 2180 | 4.00 | Top 3% | Caucasian | 96.4% |
| 2011 | WA | 2180 | 3.98 | Top 5% | Other | 93.6%* |
| 2011 | WI | 2170 | 3.50 | Top 30% | East Asian | 61.0%* |
| 2011 | NY | 2170 | 3.90 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 62.7% |
| 2011 | NJ | 2170 | 3.60 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 77.3%* |
| 2011 | MA | 2170 | 3.75 | Top 15% | Caucasian | 83.9%* |
| 2011 | CA | 2170 | 3.60 | Class Not Ranked | Other | 77.3%* |
| 2011 | WA | 2170 | 3.60 | Top 10% | East Asian | 80.1%* |
| 2011 | CA | 2170 | 4.00 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 91.3%* |
| 2011 | CA | 2160 | 3.63 | Top 10% | Middle-Eastern | 85.2% |
| 2011 | TX | 2160 | 3.92 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 90.4%* |
| 2011 | OH | 2160 | 3.89 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 93.3% |
| 2011 | CA | 2160 | 3.50 | Top 5% | East Asian | 100.0% |
| 2011 | GA | 2160 | 3.86 | Top 5% | South Asian | 90.4%* |
| 2011 | PA | 2160 | 3.63 | Class Not Ranked | East Asian | 78.0%* |
| 2011 | FL | 2160 | 3.80 | Top 3% | Caucasian | 92.8% |
| 2011 | IL | 2150 | 3.30 | Class Not Ranked | East Asian | 71.3%* |
| 2011 | IL | 2150 | 3.60 | Top 15% | Caucasian | 75.6%* |
| 2011 | TN | 2150 | 3.50 | Class Not Ranked | Other | 70.1%* |
| 2011 | FL | 2150 | 3.50 | Top 15% | Caucasian | 70.1%* |
| 2011 | (Private) | 2150 | 3.90 | Top 10% | Hispanic | 97.2% |
| 2011 | NJ | 2150 | 3.46 | Class Not Ranked | East Asian | 86.3% |
| 2011 | DE | 2150 | 2.93 | Top 25% | African-American | 56.4%* |
| 2011 | NY | 2150 | 3.80 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 100.0%* |
| 2011 | XX | 2150 | 3.90 | Class Not Ranked | East Asian | 87.8% |
| 2011 | XX | 2150 | 3.20 | Top 15% | South Asian | 50.3%* |
| 2011 | TX | 2140 | 4.00 | Top 3% | South Asian | 96.2% |
| 2011 | NJ | 2140 | 3.85 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 89.8% |
| 2011 | IL | 2140 | 3.70 | Top 10% | East Asian | 93.8% |
| 2011 | GA | 2140 | 3.86 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 87.6%* |
| 2011 | CA | 2140 | 4.00 | Class Not Ranked | African-American | 97.1%* |
| 2011 | CA | 2140 | 3.83 | Top 5% | South Asian | 93.0% |
| 2011 | NY | 2140 | 3.83 | Top 5% | East Asian | 47.8% |
| 2011 | NJ | 2140 | 3.90 | Top 3% | East Asian | 94.2% |
| 2011 | MA | 2140 | 3.68 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 68.0% |
| 2011 | XX | 2140 | 3.40 | Top 25% | East Asian | 86.4% |
| 2011 | MA | 2140 | 3.20 | Unknown | Caucasian | 79.6% |
| 2011 | TX | 2130 | 3.90 | Class Not Ranked | Other | 86.5%* |
| 2011 | TX | 2130 | 4.00 | Top 2% | East Asian | 94.8% |
| 2011 | CT | 2130 | 3.71 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 100.0% |
| 2011 | CT | 2130 | 3.66 | Top 15% | Middle-Eastern | 76.6%* |
| 2011 | CA | 2120 | 3.70 | Top 10% | African-American | 81.4% |
| 2011 | NH | 2120 | 3.40 | Top 15% | Caucasian | 80.6% |
| 2011 | GA | 2120 | 3.75 | Class Not Ranked | South Asian | 86.1% |
| 2011 | PA | 2120 | 3.67 | Class Not Ranked | East Asian | 75.2% |
| 2011 | FL | 2120 | 3.30 | Unknown | Caucasian | 53.2%* |
| 2011 | CA | 2120 | 3.70 | Unknown | Middle-Eastern | 52.1% |
| 2011 | NY | 2120 | 3.76 | Top 1% | Caucasian | 100.0% |
| 2011 | CA | 2110 | 3.50 | Top 20% | East Asian | 79.8% |
| 2011 | NY | 2110 | 3.90 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 88.9%* |
| 2011 | NY | 2110 | 3.81 | Top 2% | Caucasian | 92.0% |
| 2011 | NJ | 2110 | 3.70 | Unknown | East Asian | 75.3% |
| 2011 | FL | 2110 | 3.80 | Top 5% | Hispanic | 93.8% |
| 2011 | CA | 2100 | 3.23 | Top 25% | Caucasian | 91.4% |
| 2011 | CA | 2100 | 3.20 | Unknown | East Asian | 55.6%* |
| 2011 | CA | 2100 | 4.00 | Top 10% | Other | 86.0% |
| 2011 | CT | 2100 | 3.70 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 78.6%* |
| 2011 | MN | 2100 | 3.41 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 30.0% |
| 2011 | PA | 2100 | 3.71 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 89.9% |
| 2011 | RI | 2100 | 4.00 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 84.3% |
| 2011 | CA | 2100 | 3.40 | Unknown | Middle-Eastern | 63.9% |
| 2011 | NM | 2100 | 3.28 | Top 15% | African-American | 78.5%* |
| 2011 | FL | 2100 | 4.00 | Top 15% | Hispanic | 96.5%* |
| 2011 | CA | 2100 | 3.85 | Top 3% | East Asian | 87.6%* |
| 2011 | VA | 2100 | 3.80 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 77.6%* |
| 2011 | AZ | 2100 | 3.40 | Unknown | Caucasian | 57.3%* |
| 2011 | NY | 2100 | 3.44 | Top 15% | Caucasian | 60.0%* |
| 2011 | NJ | 2100 | 4.00 | Top 5% | Hispanic | 97.4%* |
| 2011 | NY | 2100 | 3.80 | Unknown | Caucasian | 85.9% |
| 2011 | CA | 2100 | 3.50 | Class Not Ranked | South Asian | 80.0% |
| 2011 | CA | 2100 | 3.50 | Class Not Ranked | South Asian | 80.4% |
| 2011 | MD | 2100 | 3.95 | Top 1% | Caucasian | 90.9%* |
| 2011 | PA | 2100 | 3.90 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 88.4%* |
| 2011 | DE | 2100 | 3.70 | Unknown | Caucasian | 75.6%* |
| 2011 | XX | 2100 | 4.00 | Top 10% | East Asian | 90.9% |
| 2011 | GA | 2090 | 3.82 | Top 15% | Caucasian | 80.5%* |
| 2011 | CA | 2090 | 3.81 | Class Not Ranked | East Asian | 85.8% |
| 2011 | CA | 2090 | 3.91 | Top 2% | South Asian | 85.4% |
| 2011 | NY | 2090 | 3.60 | Top 25% | Caucasian | 55.1% |
| 2011 | CA | 2090 | 3.90 | Top 10% | South Asian | 81.5% |
| 2011 | NY | 2080 | 4.00 | Top 3% | Caucasian | 90.5%* |
| 2011 | MA | 2080 | 3.40 | Class Not Ranked | South Asian | 34.0% |
| 2011 | NJ | 2080 | 3.80 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 78.6%* |
| 2011 | XX | 2080 | 3.26 | Class Not Ranked | South Asian | 44.7%* |
| 2011 | NY | 2080 | 3.52 | Unknown | South Asian | 62.9% |
| 2011 | NJ | 2080 | 3.90 | Class Not Ranked | East Asian | 82.9%* |
| 2011 | CA | 2070 | 3.83 | Top 5% | Middle-Eastern | 85.1% |
| 2011 | NY | 2070 | 3.90 | Top 4% | Caucasian | 77.3% |
| 2011 | VA | 2070 | 3.70 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 78.7%* |
| 2011 | NJ | 2070 | 3.76 | Class Not Ranked | African-American | 92.6% |
| 2011 | FL | 2070 | 3.80 | Top 3% | Hispanic | 62.1% |
| 2011 | FL | 2060 | 3.74 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 70.4%* |
| 2011 | MD | 2060 | 3.00 | Unknown | Caucasian | 99.9%* |
| 2011 | FL | 2060 | 4.00 | Top 1% | Hispanic | 97.2%* |
| 2011 | CA | 2060 | 3.70 | Class Not Ranked | East Asian | 89.1% |
| 2011 | NJ | 2060 | 3.65 | Class Not Ranked | East Asian | 68.6%* |
| 2011 | MA | 2060 | 3.04 | Unknown | Caucasian | 44.9% |
| 2011 | NY | 2060 | 3.95 | Top 5% | African-American | 97.6% |
| 2011 | (Private) | 2050 | 3.99 | Salutatorian | Caucasian | 95.0%* |
| 2011 | CA | 2050 | 3.65 | Class Not Ranked | Hispanic | 94.4%* |
| 2011 | NJ | 2050 | 3.30 | Top 40% | African-American | 55.9%* |
| 2011 | NC | 2050 | 3.50 | Unknown | Caucasian | 57.3%* |
| 2011 | NY | 2050 | 3.90 | Unknown | South Asian | 79.0% |
| 2011 | XX | 2040 | 3.78 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 76.8%* |
| 2011 | WA | 2040 | 3.78 | Top 10% | African-American | 92.6%* |
| 2011 | FL | 2040 | 3.64 | Top 15% | Caucasian | 65.4%* |
| 2011 | TX | 2040 | 3.24 | Unknown | Caucasian | 38.2%* |
| 2011 | FL | 2040 | 3.75 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 72.0%* |
| 2011 | NJ | 2030 | 3.80 | Class Not Ranked | East Asian | 87.0%* |
| 2011 | NY | 2030 | 3.80 | Class Not Ranked | Middle-Eastern | 77.1% |
| 2011 | NY | 2030 | 3.78 | Top 10% | African-American | 95.9% |
| 2011 | NY | 2030 | 3.50 | Top 30% | Caucasian | 16.2% |
| 2011 | CA | 2030 | 3.40 | Class Not Ranked | East Asian | 63.4% |
| 2011 | MA | 2030 | 3.40 | Unknown | Caucasian | 48.0%* |
| 2011 | UT | 2020 | 3.74 | Top 15% | Caucasian | 74.7%* |
| 2011 | MD | 2020 | 3.14 | Top 25% | Caucasian | 23.0%* |
| 2011 | CA | 2020 | 3.60 | Top 10% | East Asian | 15.8% |
| 2011 | XX | 2020 | 3.90 | Top 10% | Middle-Eastern | 38.0% |
| 2011 | MA | 2020 | 3.50 | Unknown | South Asian | 53.3%* |
| 2011 | NY | 2020 | 3.50 | Class Not Ranked | African-American | 26.5% |
| 2011 | NC | 2020 | 3.65 | Top 10% | Middle-Eastern | 67.3%* |
| 2011 | XX | 2010 | 3.52 | Top 10% | East Asian | 89.1%* |
| 2011 | MD | 2010 | 3.71 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 59.0% |
| 2011 | MD | 2010 | 4.00 | Top 4% | Native American | 65.6% |
| 2011 | MN | 2010 | 3.92 | Class Not Ranked | East Asian | 83.7% |
| 2011 | XX | 2010 | 3.70 | Top 20% | East Asian | 55.8% |
| 2011 | NJ | 2010 | 3.75 | Top 15% | Caucasian | 68.6%* |
| 2011 | FL | 2000 | 3.85 | Top 5% | Hispanic | 96.7%* |
| 2011 | FL | 2000 | 3.90 | Top 2% | Caucasian | 87.7%* |
| 2011 | NC | 2000 | 4.00 | Valedictorian | Caucasian | 87.9%* |
| 2011 | NC | 2000 | 3.80 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 70.6%* |
| 2011 | FL | 2000 | 3.70 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 68.2%* |
| 2011 | CA | 2000 | 3.00 | Bottom 50% | East Asian | 7.3%* |
| 2011 | TN | 1990 | 3.68 | Class Not Ranked | None Indicated | 61.6%* |
| 2011 | MO | 1990 | 2.80 | Bottom 40% | Caucasian | 2.9%* |
| 2011 | NY | 1990 | 3.05 | Class Not Ranked | Hispanic | 62.8% |
| 2011 | FL | 1990 | 3.98 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 81.5%* |
| 2011 | MD | 1990 | 3.70 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 62.9%* |
| 2011 | CA | 1990 | 3.40 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 42.3%* |
| 2011 | VA | 1990 | 3.85 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 72.1%* |
| 2011 | CA | 1980 | 3.68 | Top 10% | East Asian | 85.0%* |
| 2011 | NJ | 1980 | 4.00 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 68.8% |
| 2011 | NJ | 1980 | 3.00 | Unknown | Other | 51.0% |
| 2011 | IL | 1980 | 3.87 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 78.4%* |
| 2011 | FL | 1980 | 3.88 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 76.0%* |
| 2011 | MD | 1980 | 2.75 | Top 25% | Caucasian | 7.5%* |
| 2011 | CA | 1980 | 3.86 | Unknown | Middle-Eastern | 54.4% |
| 2011 | NY | 1980 | 3.60 | Class Not Ranked | South Asian | 61.6% |
| 2011 | NY | 1980 | 3.60 | Class Not Ranked | Hispanic | 90.4% |
| 2011 | TX | 1970 | 3.80 | Top 15% | Caucasian | 67.1%* |
| 2011 | MD | 1970 | 3.61 | Top 10% | East Asian | 58.6%* |
| 2011 | GA | 1970 | 4.00 | Bottom 50% | Hispanic | 80.8%* |
| 2011 | CA | 1970 | 3.80 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 70.7%* |
| 2011 | NY | 1960 | 3.80 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 80.1% |
| 2011 | OH | 1960 | 3.47 | Top 30% | Caucasian | 43.3% |
| 2011 | AL | 1960 | 3.20 | Top 35% | Caucasian | 15.4%* |
| 2011 | TX | 1950 | 3.52 | Top 10% | Hispanic | 87.8%* |
| 2011 | CO | 1950 | 3.64 | Unknown | Hispanic | 81.5%* |
| 2011 | NJ | 1950 | 3.75 | Bottom 50% | Caucasian | 99.9%* |
| 2011 | MD | 1950 | 3.90 | Top 15% | South Asian | 75.9% |
| 2011 | NJ | 1950 | 3.81 | Top 5% | Other | 72.3%* |
| 2011 | NJ | 1950 | 3.75 | Unknown | Caucasian | 61.2%* |
| 2011 | NY | 1950 | 3.52 | Unknown | Caucasian | 45.4%* |
| 2011 | CA | 1950 | 3.30 | Class Not Ranked | South Asian | 31.0%* |
| 2011 | CA | 1950 | 3.65 | Class Not Ranked | East Asian | 47.3% |
| 2011 | MA | 1950 | 3.70 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 69.0% |
| 2011 | NJ | 1950 | 3.45 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 40.6%* |
| 2011 | CA | 1940 | 3.50 | Class Not Ranked | African-American | 74.0%* |
| 2011 | CA | 1940 | 3.67 | Top 10% | African-American | 84.4%* |
| 2011 | FL | 1930 | 3.70 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 63.1%* |
| 2011 | FL | 1920 | 3.30 | Top 30% | Hispanic | 66.5%* |
| 2011 | NY | 1920 | 3.80 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 68.2%* |
| 2011 | NJ | 1920 | 3.60 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 46.9%* |
| 2011 | CA | 1920 | 3.70 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 52.4% |
| 2011 | MA | 1910 | 3.64 | Top 15% | Other | 48.4%* |
| 2011 | PA | 1910 | 3.89 | Top 15% | Caucasian | 65.4%* |
| 2011 | NY | 1910 | 3.00 | Class Not Ranked | African-American | 37.4%* |
| 2011 | CA | 1910 | 3.00 | Unknown | Caucasian | 7.9% |
| 2011 | NY | 1910 | 3.24 | Class Not Ranked | South Asian | 23.5%* |
| 2011 | (Private) | 1900 | 3.89 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 79.3%* |
| 2011 | NJ | 1900 | 3.50 | Top 1% | South Asian | 48.7%* |
| 2011 | MD | 1900 | 3.56 | Unknown | African-American | 100.0%* |
| 2011 | CA | 1900 | 3.87 | Class Not Ranked | East Asian | 50.3% |
| 2011 | VA | 1900 | 3.59 | Top 10% | East Asian | 70.1% |
| 2011 | CA | 1900 | 3.77 | Top 10% | East Asian | 53.5% |
| 2011 | XX | 1890 | 3.50 | Unknown | East Asian | 43.3% |
| 2011 | NJ | 1890 | 3.45 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 64.9% |
| 2011 | CA | 1880 | 4.00 | Top 1% | Caucasian | 87.6%* |
| 2011 | CA | 1880 | 3.80 | Valedictorian | Other | 65.9% |
| 2011 | CA | 1880 | 3.20 | Unknown | Hispanic | 47.0%* |
| 2011 | NY | 1880 | 3.00 | Top 20% | Other | 10.1%* |
| 2011 | MA | 1870 | 3.60 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 66.6%* |
| 2011 | TX | 1870 | 3.00 | Class Not Ranked | South Asian | 3.8% |
| 2011 | PA | 1870 | 3.67 | Top 10% | South Asian | 49.0%* |
| 2011 | NJ | 1870 | 3.65 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 47.6%* |
| 2011 | WA | 1870 | 3.89 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 70.1% |
| 2011 | NE | 1860 | 3.71 | Top 20% | African-American | 73.6%* |
| 2011 | MD | 1860 | 3.40 | Top 15% | Caucasian | 26.7%* |
| 2011 | PA | 1860 | 3.70 | Top 15% | Caucasian | 45.7%* |
| 2011 | CA | 1860 | 3.39 | Top 25% | Caucasian | 20.2%* |
| 2011 | MD | 1860 | 3.88 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 58.2%* |
| 2011 | CO | 1860 | 3.50 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 28.9%* |
| 2011 | MD | 1850 | 3.00 | Unknown | East Asian | 10.2%* |
| 2011 | MD | 1850 | 3.67 | Unknown | Caucasian | 42.4%* |
| 2011 | OH | 1850 | 3.70 | Top 30% | Caucasian | 32.7%* |
| 2011 | AZ | 1830 | 3.70 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 37.7%* |
| 2011 | CA | 1820 | 3.83 | Top 10% | Other | 53.7%* |
| 2011 | WA | 1820 | 3.20 | Unknown | South Asian | 14.4%* |
| 2011 | AK | 1820 | 3.50 | Top 10% | Other | 31.5%* |
| 2011 | (Private) | 1810 | 3.75 | Top 4% | Caucasian | 51.5%* |
| 2011 | NJ | 1810 | 3.95 | Top 15% | Caucasian | 56.2%* |
| 2011 | XX | 1810 | 3.64 | Top 10% | East Asian | 38.9%* |
| 2011 | PA | 1800 | 3.90 | Unknown | Caucasian | 54.8% |
| 2011 | CA | 1800 | 3.50 | Top 20% | East Asian | 66.8% |
| 2011 | IL | 1800 | 3.40 | Top 40% | Caucasian | 15.6%* |
| 2011 | XX | 1800 | 3.50 | Class Not Ranked | East Asian | 39.3% |
| 2011 | MD | 1800 | 3.97 | Top 5% | East Asian | 53.1% |
| 2011 | NC | 1800 | 3.70 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 41.8%* |
| 2011 | TX | 1800 | 3.25 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 12.7%* |
| 2011 | TX | 1790 | 3.10 | Top 20% | African-American | 53.3%* |
| 2011 | MD | 1790 | 3.50 | Top 25% | Caucasian | 19.1%* |
| 2011 | NH | 1780 | 3.00 | Top 30% | Caucasian | 4.4%* |
| 2011 | VA | 1780 | 3.97 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 71.5% |
| 2011 | MA | 1780 | 3.75 | Top 1% | None Indicated | 53.4% |
| 2011 | NJ | 1770 | 3.73 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 84.6%* |
| 2011 | CA | 1770 | 4.00 | Top 15% | Caucasian | 54.4%* |
| 2011 | NJ | 1770 | 3.20 | Top 20% | Hispanic | 29.1%* |
| 2011 | PA | 1770 | 3.79 | Top 5% | Hispanic | 77.9%* |
| 2011 | NY | 1760 | 3.67 | Top 15% | Caucasian | 31.1%* |
| 2011 | NJ | 1740 | 3.60 | Class Not Ranked | Hispanic | 67.3%* |
| 2011 | CT | 1740 | 3.25 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 12.8%* |
| 2011 | MA | 1740 | 3.20 | Top 30% | Caucasian | 6.2%* |
| 2011 | VA | 1730 | 3.69 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 25.6%* |
| 2011 | SC | 1710 | 3.70 | Unknown | Caucasian | 27.1%* |
| 2011 | NY | 1700 | 3.75 | Top 10% | East Asian | 32.5%* |
| 2011 | CA | 1700 | 3.45 | Top 30% | Middle-Eastern | 9.6%* |
| 2011 | NJ | 1690 | 3.40 | Bottom 50% | Middle-Eastern | 4.3%* |
| 2011 | PA | 1690 | 3.30 | Class Not Ranked | East Asian | 3.7% |
| 2011 | NH | 1690 | 3.29 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 11.1%* |
| 2011 | CA | 1680 | 3.60 | Top 15% | African-American | 47.7%* |
| 2011 | (Private) | 1680 | 4.00 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 46.4%* |
| 2011 | NH | 1680 | 3.10 | Top 40% | Caucasian | 2.5%* |
| 2011 | CA | 1680 | 3.20 | Unknown | Other | 7.3%* |
| 2011 | PA | 1670 | 3.87 | Top 5% | African-American | 72.1%* |
| 2011 | PA | 1670 | 3.80 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 32.0%* |
| 2011 | NJ | 1670 | 3.73 | Top 10% | Hispanic | 33.8% |
| 2011 | SC | 1660 | 3.00 | Top 30% | Native American | 11.6%* |
| 2011 | NJ | 1650 | 3.70 | Top 20% | Hispanic | 46.4%* |
| 2011 | CA | 1650 | 3.50 | Top 10% | South Asian | 15.4%* |
| 2011 | CA | 1650 | 3.50 | Top 15% | Caucasian | 13.3%* |
| 2011 | CA | 1640 | 4.00 | Top 1% | Caucasian | 48.6%* |
| 2011 | WA | 1630 | 3.83 | Top 20% | South Asian | 22.6%* |
| 2011 | NJ | 1620 | 3.53 | Top 20% | East Asian | 10.7%* |
| 2011 | CA | 1610 | 4.00 | Unknown | Other | 56.4%* |
| 2011 | PA | 1600 | 3.40 | Top 35% | African-American | 53.6%* |
| 2011 | CA | 1600 | 3.70 | Unknown | East Asian | 16.9%* |
| 2011 | NJ | 1590 | 3.90 | Top 20% | East Asian | 73.8%* |
| 2011 | FL | 1590 | 3.90 | Top 5% | Hispanic | 64.4%* |
| 2011 | NJ | 1590 | 3.59 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 14.4%* |
| 2011 | CA | 1580 | 3.60 | Unknown | East Asian | 9.4% |
| 2011 | CA | 1570 | 3.17 | Bottom 50% | Caucasian | 1.2%* |
| 2011 | CA | 1550 | 3.34 | Unknown | Caucasian | 12.9%* |
| 2011 | NJ | 1550 | 3.70 | Unknown | Caucasian | 13.6%* |
| 2011 | NJ | 1540 | 3.76 | Top 10% | Hispanic | 43.9%* |
| 2011 | CA | 1500 | 3.70 | Top 10% | East Asian | 1.4% |
| 2011 | NJ | 1500 | 3.70 | Top 30% | Other | 6.7%* |
| 2011 | GA | 1490 | 3.40 | Top 35% | African-American | 25.4%* |
| 2011 | NJ | 1490 | 3.86 | Top 10% | Hispanic | 44.4%* |
| 2011 | XX | 1490 | 3.50 | Top 10% | African-American | 22.6%* |
| 2011 | MD | 1480 | 3.73 | Top 15% | South Asian | 10.3%* |
| 2011 | NJ | 1470 | 4.00 | Top 2% | African-American | 57.9%* |
| 2011 | CA | 1470 | 3.66 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 8.3%* |
| 2011 | NJ | 1460 | 3.89 | Top 5% | Hispanic | 46.5%* |
| 2011 | DE | 1450 | 4.00 | Top 15% | South Asian | 1.2% |
| 2011 | ME | 1450 | 3.50 | Top 15% | Caucasian | 4.9%* |
| 2011 | MD | 1440 | 4.00 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 21.7%* |
| 2011 | PA | 1410 | 4.00 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 16.6%* |
| 2011 | IL | 1400 | 3.85 | Class Not Ranked | South Asian | 84.8%* |
| 2011 | FL | 1300 | 3.00 | Top 10% | African-American | 46.6%* |
| 2011 | MA | 1070 | 3.90 | Top 1% | Caucasian | 37.1%* |
| 2011 | PA | 520 | 2.67 | Bottom 50% | None Indicated | 0.0%* |
| 2011 | LA | 36 | 3.70 | Top 5% | South Asian | 98.5% |
| 2011 | OH | 36 | 3.95 | Top 10% | None Indicated | 99.4% |
| 2011 | VA | 35 | 3.90 | Top 10% | Middle-Eastern | 76.9% |
| 2011 | OH | 35 | 3.95 | Valedictorian | East Asian | 99.0% |
| 2011 | NY | 35 | 4.00 | Top 5% | African-American | 99.7% |
| 2011 | MN | 34 | 3.98 | Top 1% | East Asian | 96.4% |
| 2011 | WI | 32 | 3.80 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 85.1%* |
| 2011 | WI | 32 | 3.50 | Unknown | Caucasian | 67.6%* |
| 2011 | TN | 32 | 3.96 | Top 2% | Caucasian | 92.1%* |
| 2011 | NY | 32 | 3.80 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 82.9%* |
| 2011 | MI | 32 | 3.60 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 76.6%* |
| 2011 | OR | 32 | 4.00 | Top 1% | Caucasian | 93.1%* |
| 2011 | IL | 32 | 3.62 | Unknown | Caucasian | 74.5%* |
| 2011 | IL | 32 | 3.70 | Top 10% | Hispanic | 94.3%* |
| 2011 | FL | 31 | 3.82 | Top 3% | Other | 84.6%* |
| 2011 | IL | 31 | 3.87 | Top 4% | Caucasian | 86.0%* |
| 2011 | SC | 31 | 3.20 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 43.5%* |
| 2011 | MN | 31 | 3.85 | Class Not Ranked | East Asian | 85.6% |
| 2011 | MI | 30 | 3.65 | Top 20% | African-American | 84.2%* |
| 2011 | XX | 30 | 4.00 | Unknown | East Asian | 81.5%* |
| 2011 | PA | 30 | 3.20 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 32.0%* |
| 2011 | (Private) | 30 | 3.80 | Class Not Ranked | Hispanic | 90.5%* |
| 2011 | AL | 30 | 3.94 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 81.5%* |
| 2011 | IL | 30 | 3.82 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 78.8%* |
| 2011 | CA | 30 | 3.20 | Unknown | Caucasian | 32.0%* |
| 2011 | CA | 30 | 3.80 | Top 10% | East Asian | 84.8% |
| 2011 | LA | 30 | 3.70 | Top 10% | Caucasian | |