New York University Applications and Decisions
Below is a list of applicants who have demonstrated interest in New York University. Our best formula
for this college is based on
426 members who were accepted or rejected. The formula
has a college admissions prediction accuracy of
83%?.
Because not all members have filled out the most recent version of our survey, some predictions are made based on
less-accurate models. Those are noted with an asterisk (*) next to their prediction.
This is a very popular school, so we're only showing you profiles that have received an admissions decision. If you
want to see all applicants to this school,
click here (caution: the page will take awhile to load).
|
| 2010 | NJ | 2180 | 3.95 | Top 5% | None Indicated | 93.1%* |
| 2010 | CT | 1640 | 3.09 | Bottom 40% | Native American | 3.8%* |
| 2009 | MA | 2390 | 3.62 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 77.5% |
| 2009 | VA | 2340 | 3.74 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 98.0% |
| 2009 | NJ | 2240 | 3.73 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 94.9% |
| 2009 | GA | 2240 | 3.72 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 91.9% |
| 2009 | CA | 2190 | 3.60 | Top 10% | East Asian | 97.0% |
| 2009 | PA | 2160 | 3.80 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 87.1%* |
| 2009 | MA | 2130 | 3.44 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 84.9% |
| 2009 | MD | 2120 | 3.64 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 71.0% |
| 2009 | GA | 2110 | 3.75 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 65.5% |
| 2009 | VA | 2090 | 3.98 | Top 1% | Caucasian | 39.6% |
| 2009 | (Private) | 2090 | 3.70 | Class Not Ranked | East Asian | 84.2% |
| 2009 | PA | 2090 | 4.00 | Top 10% | East Asian | 66.0% |
| 2009 | NY | 2070 | 3.80 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 86.1% |
| 2009 | MI | 2060 | 3.61 | Class Not Ranked | South Asian | 82.5% |
| 2009 | XX | 1980 | 3.80 | Top 10% | South Asian | 80.6% |
| 2009 | PA | 1980 | 3.81 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 72.3% |
| 2009 | NJ | 1980 | 3.50 | Unknown | South Asian | 48.0%* |
| 2009 | XX | 1960 | 3.45 | Top 30% | East Asian | 46.7% |
| 2009 | MA | 1930 | 3.61 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 12.0% |
| 2009 | NY | 1920 | 3.50 | Class Not Ranked | South Asian | 10.6% |
| 2009 | CA | 1880 | 3.40 | Class Not Ranked | None Indicated | 48.8% |
| 2009 | FL | 1870 | 3.75 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 72.2% |
| 2009 | NJ | 1840 | 3.50 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 99.9%* |
| 2009 | LA | 31 | 3.80 | Top 5% | Hispanic | 69.4% |
| 2008 | MD | 2340 | 3.63 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 96.8% |
| 2008 | CO | 2180 | 3.98 | Top 1% | None Indicated | 92.7% |
| 2008 | VA | 2160 | 3.60 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 73.3%* |
| 2008 | GA | 2140 | 3.80 | Bottom 50% | Caucasian | 61.1%* |
| 2008 | CT | 2090 | 3.88 | Unknown | South Asian | 83.0%* |
| 2008 | NJ | 2030 | 3.70 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 64.3%* |
| 2008 | FL | 2020 | 3.93 | Unknown | Hispanic | 93.3% |
| 2008 | VA | 1910 | 3.30 | Unknown | Caucasian | 33.1% |
| 2008 | XX | 1860 | 3.00 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 9.1%* |
| 2008 | FL | 1840 | 3.57 | Unknown | Hispanic | 66.5%* |
| 2008 | CA | 1590 | 3.75 | Unknown | East Asian | 18.2%* |
| 2007 | NJ | 2250 | 3.80 | Top 5% | East Asian | 92.8%* |
| 2003 | WI | 2280 | 3.60 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 86.2%* |
|
| 2011 | NY | 2000 | 3.68 | Top 25% | South Asian | 79.3% |
| 2010 | CA | 2030 | 3.77 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 75.4%* |
| 2009 | FL | 2400 | 4.00 | Valedictorian | Caucasian | 100.0% |
| 2009 | PA | 2390 | 4.00 | Salutatorian | East Asian | 98.6% |
| 2009 | MN | 2360 | 3.86 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 98.3% |
| 2009 | NJ | 2350 | 3.90 | Class Not Ranked | None Indicated | 96.2% |
| 2009 | CA | 2350 | 3.92 | Top 5% | None Indicated | 99.2% |
| 2009 | TX | 2350 | 4.00 | Top 1% | East Asian | 99.0% |
| 2009 | CA | 2350 | 4.00 | Top 1% | None Indicated | 99.3% |
| 2009 | (Private) | 2350 | 3.80 | Class Not Ranked | East Asian | 95.2% |
| 2009 | PA | 2350 | 3.80 | Top 10% | Other | 100.0% |
| 2009 | (Private) | 2340 | 4.00 | Top 1% | None Indicated | 98.0% |
| 2009 | TX | 2330 | 3.93 | Top 5% | East Asian | 98.4% |
| 2009 | RI | 2330 | 3.95 | Top 5% | East Asian | 98.6% |
| 2009 | MA | 2330 | 3.88 | Top 1% | Caucasian | 98.7% |
| 2009 | NY | 2310 | 3.99 | Valedictorian | East Asian | 98.5% |
| 2009 | NJ | 2310 | 3.70 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 100.0% |
| 2009 | (Private) | 2300 | 4.00 | Top 10% | East Asian | 98.2% |
| 2009 | KY | 2300 | 3.66 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 97.2% |
| 2009 | NJ | 2300 | 3.90 | Class Not Ranked | East Asian | 98.2% |
| 2009 | NY | 2290 | 3.64 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 96.2% |
| 2009 | NY | 2290 | 3.76 | Class Not Ranked | East Asian | 96.6% |
| 2009 | NY | 2280 | 4.00 | Unknown | East Asian | 95.0% |
| 2009 | SC | 2280 | 4.00 | Top 1% | Caucasian | 98.0% |
| 2009 | OH | 2280 | 3.60 | Top 20% | African-American | 97.9% |
| 2009 | CA | 2270 | 3.89 | Top 1% | East Asian | 98.0% |
| 2009 | (Private) | 2270 | 3.88 | Class Not Ranked | Hispanic | 99.2% |
| 2009 | MA | 2260 | 3.60 | Unknown | Hispanic | 97.5% |
| 2009 | OR | 2260 | 4.00 | Valedictorian | Other | 96.1% |
| 2009 | CA | 2250 | 3.94 | Class Not Ranked | South Asian | 97.8% |
| 2009 | (Private) | 2250 | 3.94 | Salutatorian | East Asian | 96.1%* |
| 2009 | NY | 2250 | 3.95 | Top 5% | African-American | 85.6% |
| 2009 | WA | 2250 | 3.70 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 100.0% |
| 2009 | CA | 2250 | 3.65 | Top 10% | Other | 94.0% |
| 2009 | NY | 2250 | 3.80 | Class Not Ranked | South Asian | 91.6% |
| 2009 | NY | 2240 | 3.50 | Class Not Ranked | East Asian | 95.0% |
| 2009 | CA | 2240 | 3.60 | Top 10% | East Asian | 96.2% |
| 2009 | CA | 2230 | 3.90 | Top 5% | East Asian | 97.5% |
| 2009 | PA | 2230 | 3.75 | Top 10% | South Asian | 94.2% |
| 2009 | NY | 2230 | 3.80 | Unknown | Caucasian | 100.0%* |
| 2009 | NJ | 2230 | 3.93 | Class Not Ranked | South Asian | 92.3% |
| 2009 | NY | 2230 | 3.90 | Valedictorian | None Indicated | 97.1% |
| 2009 | NJ | 2220 | 3.84 | Class Not Ranked | South Asian | 93.9% |
| 2009 | MD | 2220 | 3.75 | Top 5% | None Indicated | 95.4% |
| 2009 | CA | 2220 | 3.73 | Top 20% | East Asian | 87.7% |
| 2009 | PA | 2220 | 3.72 | Top 10% | South Asian | 90.3% |
| 2009 | TX | 2210 | 3.71 | Top 20% | South Asian | 89.3% |
| 2009 | FL | 2210 | 3.70 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 95.9% |
| 2009 | CA | 2210 | 3.78 | Top 4% | East Asian | 95.5% |
| 2009 | (Private) | 2210 | 4.00 | Salutatorian | Caucasian | 97.2% |
| 2009 | VA | 2210 | 3.53 | Class Not Ranked | Hispanic | 96.2% |
| 2009 | IL | 2200 | 3.97 | Top 1% | Caucasian | 97.5% |
| 2009 | NJ | 2200 | 3.64 | Top 10% | East Asian | 90.0% |
| 2009 | CA | 2200 | 3.88 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 94.8% |
| 2009 | XX | 2200 | 3.87 | Top 20% | East Asian | 93.5% |
| 2009 | PA | 2200 | 3.85 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 89.5% |
| 2009 | CO | 2190 | 3.75 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 89.1% |
| 2009 | NJ | 2190 | 3.87 | Top 10% | None Indicated | 93.6% |
| 2009 | NJ | 2190 | 3.60 | Class Not Ranked | None Indicated | 100.0% |
| 2009 | CA | 2190 | 3.76 | Class Not Ranked | East Asian | 86.5% |
| 2009 | WA | 2180 | 4.00 | Top 1% | East Asian | 92.2% |
| 2009 | FL | 2180 | 3.95 | Top 10% | None Indicated | 94.8% |
| 2009 | FL | 2180 | 3.92 | Top 5% | South Asian | 95.5% |
| 2009 | CA | 2170 | 3.49 | Top 35% | None Indicated | 78.5% |
| 2009 | NJ | 2170 | 3.73 | Class Not Ranked | East Asian | 82.0% |
| 2009 | PA | 2170 | 3.80 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 94.0% |
| 2009 | MA | 2150 | 3.90 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 96.5% |
| 2009 | XX | 2150 | 3.70 | Top 1% | East Asian | 89.3% |
| 2009 | NY | 2150 | 3.80 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 100.0% |
| 2009 | NH | 2150 | 3.83 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 92.4% |
| 2009 | NJ | 2140 | 3.85 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 90.5% |
| 2009 | VA | 2140 | 4.00 | Valedictorian | East Asian | 97.1% |
| 2009 | CT | 2140 | 3.81 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 90.6% |
| 2009 | CT | 2140 | 3.83 | Top 1% | African-American | 97.1% |
| 2009 | WI | 2130 | 4.00 | Top 1% | East Asian | 96.8% |
| 2009 | NJ | 2130 | 4.00 | Top 10% | South Asian | 92.7% |
| 2009 | NV | 2130 | 3.70 | Top 1% | Caucasian | 86.4% |
| 2009 | PA | 2130 | 3.86 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 90.1% |
| 2009 | TX | 2130 | 3.73 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 76.2% |
| 2009 | PA | 2130 | 3.70 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 75.7% |
| 2009 | MD | 2130 | 3.96 | Top 5% | East Asian | 94.1% |
| 2009 | (Private) | 2120 | 3.76 | Top 5% | South Asian | 98.1% |
| 2009 | PA | 2120 | 3.46 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 100.0% |
| 2009 | NY | 2120 | 4.00 | Valedictorian | South Asian | 95.9% |
| 2009 | FL | 2120 | 3.80 | Top 1% | East Asian | 94.4% |
| 2009 | AZ | 2120 | 3.89 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 86.4% |
| 2009 | CA | 2120 | 3.86 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 91.4% |
| 2009 | CA | 2120 | 3.77 | Class Not Ranked | Other | 79.5% |
| 2009 | NY | 2110 | 3.70 | Class Not Ranked | East Asian | 72.3% |
| 2009 | CA | 2110 | 4.00 | Valedictorian | South Asian | 92.6%* |
| 2009 | FL | 2110 | 3.79 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 82.6% |
| 2009 | NJ | 2110 | 4.00 | Valedictorian | Caucasian | 96.3% |
| 2009 | (Private) | 2110 | 3.80 | Class Not Ranked | African-American | 96.9% |
| 2009 | NY | 2110 | 3.70 | Top 5% | Hispanic | 95.3% |
| 2009 | FL | 2100 | 3.90 | Top 5% | Hispanic | 93.9% |
| 2009 | XX | 2100 | 3.75 | Top 1% | South Asian | 90.5% |
| 2009 | VA | 2100 | 4.00 | Valedictorian | Middle-Eastern | 94.7% |
| 2009 | NJ | 2100 | 3.61 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 62.1% |
| 2009 | CT | 2090 | 3.94 | Top 5% | Hispanic | 97.9% |
| 2009 | WI | 2090 | 3.90 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 89.8% |
| 2009 | CA | 2090 | 3.85 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 89.3% |
| 2009 | VA | 2090 | 3.96 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 100.0% |
| 2009 | DC | 2090 | 3.89 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 88.0% |
| 2009 | CA | 2090 | 3.59 | Class Not Ranked | Hispanic | 90.8% |
| 2009 | NJ | 2090 | 3.46 | Class Not Ranked | South Asian | 77.6% |
| 2009 | IN | 2080 | 3.86 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 90.7% |
| 2009 | IN | 2070 | 4.00 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 92.2% |
| 2009 | (Private) | 2070 | 3.70 | Top 5% | South Asian | 74.4% |
| 2009 | PA | 2070 | 4.00 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 81.3% |
| 2009 | FL | 2070 | 4.00 | Top 1% | Caucasian | 85.3% |
| 2009 | CA | 2070 | 3.87 | Top 10% | East Asian | 90.4% |
| 2009 | NY | 2070 | 3.85 | Top 20% | East Asian | 79.0% |
| 2009 | NY | 2060 | 3.70 | Class Not Ranked | South Asian | 71.5%* |
| 2009 | NJ | 2060 | 3.80 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 78.5% |
| 2009 | IL | 2050 | 3.70 | Top 10% | Other | 92.3% |
| 2009 | NY | 2050 | 3.84 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 81.8% |
| 2009 | (Private) | 2050 | 3.86 | Top 5% | East Asian | 85.6% |
| 2009 | NJ | 2050 | 3.60 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 72.3% |
| 2009 | (Private) | 2050 | 4.00 | Top 5% | East Asian | 94.1% |
| 2009 | PA | 2040 | 3.95 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 93.0% |
| 2009 | NJ | 2040 | 3.70 | Top 10% | African-American | 100.0% |
| 2009 | CA | 2040 | 3.69 | Unknown | Caucasian | 71.0% |
| 2009 | FL | 2030 | 3.92 | Top 1% | Hispanic | 96.2% |
| 2009 | TX | 2030 | 3.50 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 50.8%* |
| 2009 | (Private) | 2030 | 3.65 | Top 5% | Hispanic | 91.7% |
| 2009 | IN | 2020 | 3.80 | Top 10% | South Asian | 86.3% |
| 2009 | XX | 2020 | 3.60 | Top 20% | South Asian | 52.8% |
| 2009 | CA | 2010 | 3.50 | Class Not Ranked | African-American | 86.4% |
| 2009 | NY | 2010 | 3.75 | Top 1% | Hispanic | 93.8% |
| 2009 | NY | 2010 | 3.73 | Top 10% | Hispanic | 90.2% |
| 2009 | CA | 2000 | 3.71 | Top 1% | East Asian | 88.6% |
| 2009 | CA | 2000 | 3.90 | Top 10% | Middle-Eastern | 70.1% |
| 2009 | XX | 2000 | 3.60 | Top 20% | South Asian | 45.7% |
| 2009 | NY | 2000 | 3.50 | Top 20% | Hispanic | 89.8% |
| 2009 | NY | 2000 | 3.86 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 100.0% |
| 2009 | GA | 2000 | 3.51 | Top 20% | South Asian | 59.4% |
| 2009 | CA | 2000 | 3.88 | Top 1% | East Asian | 85.3% |
| 2009 | CT | 2000 | 3.60 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 55.0% |
| 2009 | WA | 1990 | 4.00 | Valedictorian | Hispanic | 89.3% |
| 2009 | PA | 1980 | 3.81 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 71.2% |
| 2009 | TX | 1960 | 3.90 | Top 10% | African-American | 89.5% |
| 2009 | NY | 1950 | 3.84 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 85.3% |
| 2009 | TX | 1950 | 3.98 | Top 20% | East Asian | 72.8% |
| 2009 | CA | 1950 | 3.55 | Class Not Ranked | Hispanic | 84.1% |
| 2009 | OH | 1930 | 3.70 | Class Not Ranked | South Asian | 45.9% |
| 2009 | NY | 1920 | 4.00 | Top 10% | Hispanic | 93.8% |
| 2009 | FL | 1920 | 3.48 | Top 20% | Hispanic | 78.9% |
| 2009 | NY | 1920 | 3.80 | Unknown | East Asian | 55.2% |
| 2009 | CA | 1910 | 3.40 | Top 30% | African-American | 63.0% |
| 2009 | TX | 1900 | 3.60 | Top 20% | Hispanic | 85.3% |
| 2009 | MA | 1900 | 3.40 | Top 10% | African-American | 66.9%* |
| 2009 | (Private) | 1890 | 4.00 | Top 10% | Middle-Eastern | 69.9% |
| 2009 | NJ | 1880 | 3.70 | Top 40% | Caucasian | 99.9%* |
| 2009 | FL | 1870 | 4.00 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 54.5% |
| 2009 | NY | 1870 | 3.70 | Top 5% | Hispanic | 73.7% |
| 2009 | CA | 1860 | 3.60 | Top 20% | Hispanic | 65.2% |
| 2009 | TX | 1860 | 3.90 | Top 20% | Hispanic | 87.7% |
| 2009 | NH | 1830 | 3.00 | Top 10% | East Asian | 23.1% |
| 2009 | FL | 1780 | 3.35 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 50.2% |
| 2009 | OH | 1770 | 3.61 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 33.3% |
| 2009 | XX | 1750 | 3.81 | Class Not Ranked | East Asian | 27.2% |
| 2009 | FL | 1740 | 3.72 | Top 10% | Hispanic | 62.5% |
| 2009 | NY | 1510 | 3.67 | Top 10% | South Asian | 100.0% |
| 2009 | LA | 1410 | 3.85 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 87.7%* |
| 2009 | NY | 1080 | 3.90 | Top 1% | Hispanic | 70.0% |
| 2009 | IL | 34 | 3.62 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 88.7% |
| 2009 | CA | 34 | 3.96 | Top 5% | Other | 94.8% |
| 2009 | XX | 33 | 3.60 | Class Not Ranked | Hispanic | 97.8% |
| 2009 | PA | 33 | 3.96 | Class Not Ranked | None Indicated | 94.6% |
| 2009 | CA | 33 | 4.00 | Valedictorian | Caucasian | 94.5% |
| 2009 | IL | 31 | 4.00 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 88.3% |
| 2009 | MI | 29 | 3.50 | Top 30% | South Asian | 32.2%* |
| 2009 | MI | 27 | 3.72 | Unknown | Caucasian | 43.1%* |
| 2009 | CA | 27 | 4.00 | Valedictorian | None Indicated | 71.3% |
| 2009 | CT | 24 | 4.00 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 48.6%* |
| 2008 | (Private) | 2400 | 4.00 | Class Not Ranked | East Asian | 97.4% |
| 2008 | CA | 2370 | 4.00 | Top 1% | South Asian | 99.2% |
| 2008 | NJ | 2350 | 4.00 | Valedictorian | East Asian | 99.0% |
| 2008 | CA | 2340 | 4.00 | Unknown | Other | 98.2% |
| 2008 | XX | 2330 | 4.00 | Top 5% | East Asian | 98.8% |
| 2008 | OH | 2320 | 4.00 | Top 1% | South Asian | 98.8% |
| 2008 | CA | 2320 | 3.81 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 98.5% |
| 2008 | CT | 2320 | 3.54 | Top 20% | East Asian | 93.7% |
| 2008 | MA | 2320 | 4.00 | Valedictorian | Caucasian | 97.5%* |
| 2008 | CA | 2310 | 3.86 | Top 5% | East Asian | 95.5%* |
| 2008 | NY | 2290 | 3.96 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 85.1% |
| 2008 | CA | 2290 | 4.00 | Top 1% | Caucasian | 98.3% |
| 2008 | PA | 2290 | 3.90 | Top 1% | None Indicated | 96.1% |
| 2008 | NY | 2290 | 4.00 | Top 1% | African-American | 99.6% |
| 2008 | XX | 2260 | 4.00 | Top 10% | None Indicated | 97.6% |
| 2008 | CA | 2250 | 3.90 | Top 5% | East Asian | 94.6% |
| 2008 | PA | 2250 | 3.85 | Top 10% | South Asian | 96.4% |
| 2008 | NY | 2240 | 4.00 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 97.6% |
| 2008 | NJ | 2230 | 3.70 | Unknown | Caucasian | 92.7% |
| 2008 | TX | 2230 | 3.70 | Unknown | East Asian | 93.1% |
| 2008 | CA | 2220 | 3.95 | Top 1% | Middle-Eastern | 97.8% |
| 2008 | NJ | 2210 | 3.85 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 91.9% |
| 2008 | CA | 2200 | 3.83 | Top 10% | East Asian | 96.8% |
| 2008 | CA | 2200 | 3.98 | Top 5% | Hispanic | 99.0% |
| 2008 | CA | 2190 | 3.79 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 89.8% |
| 2008 | PA | 2190 | 3.56 | Unknown | Caucasian | 78.3% |
| 2008 | MA | 2190 | 3.60 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 79.3%* |
| 2008 | (Private) | 2190 | 3.87 | Top 10% | East Asian | 95.6% |
| 2008 | XX | 2180 | 3.50 | Top 1% | South Asian | 95.0% |
| 2008 | CO | 2180 | 3.80 | Top 10% | East Asian | 93.4% |
| 2008 | MA | 2170 | 3.40 | Unknown | Caucasian | 66.1%* |
| 2008 | (Private) | 2170 | 3.81 | Top 5% | South Asian | 94.4% |
| 2008 | TX | 2160 | 3.96 | Top 5% | East Asian | 96.0% |
| 2008 | OH | 2160 | 3.42 | Top 20% | South Asian | 86.1% |
| 2008 | WA | 2150 | 3.95 | Top 5% | East Asian | 92.0%* |
| 2008 | MA | 2140 | 3.90 | Valedictorian | Caucasian | 91.7%* |
| 2008 | FL | 2130 | 3.80 | Top 5% | Other | 82.6% |
| 2008 | NY | 2120 | 3.85 | Unknown | Caucasian | 84.8%* |
| 2008 | XX | 2120 | 4.00 | Valedictorian | East Asian | 75.1% |
| 2008 | NJ | 2110 | 3.80 | Top 10% | South Asian | 81.4% |
| 2008 | CA | 2110 | 4.00 | Top 5% | East Asian | 87.6% |
| 2008 | CA | 2090 | 3.90 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 82.2% |
| 2008 | CA | 2090 | 3.98 | Top 5% | East Asian | 86.7% |
| 2008 | TX | 2090 | 3.55 | Top 20% | Hispanic | 88.5% |
| 2008 | CA | 2080 | 3.90 | Top 1% | Caucasian | 93.7% |
| 2008 | MD | 2080 | 3.63 | Unknown | Hispanic | 90.4% |
| 2008 | FL | 2070 | 3.79 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 83.8% |
| 2008 | PA | 2060 | 3.90 | Top 10% | Other | 83.2% |
| 2008 | CA | 2050 | 3.87 | Top 5% | East Asian | 93.2% |
| 2008 | NY | 2050 | 3.50 | Unknown | African-American | 91.5% |
| 2008 | NJ | 2040 | 3.80 | Top 10% | Hispanic | 89.9% |
| 2008 | PA | 2020 | 3.40 | Unknown | None Indicated | 53.3% |
| 2008 | NJ | 2020 | 3.80 | Top 10% | South Asian | 86.3% |
| 2008 | WA | 2020 | 3.92 | Top 10% | East Asian | 80.1% |
| 2008 | PA | 2010 | 3.94 | Salutatorian | African-American | 88.9% |
| 2008 | OH | 2010 | 3.81 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 75.4%* |
| 2008 | XX | 2000 | 3.00 | Top 5% | South Asian | 43.7% |
| 2008 | CT | 2000 | 4.00 | Valedictorian | East Asian | 87.4%* |
| 2008 | CA | 1980 | 3.67 | Valedictorian | Caucasian | 81.4% |
| 2008 | ME | 1940 | 3.80 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 56.8% |
| 2008 | FL | 1930 | 4.00 | Salutatorian | Caucasian | 62.8% |
| 2008 | PA | 1930 | 3.70 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 59.2%* |
| 2008 | PA | 1880 | 3.30 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 23.6%* |
| 2008 | CA | 1870 | 3.50 | Top 20% | East Asian | 43.7% |
| 2008 | HI | 1820 | 4.00 | Top 1% | Caucasian | 71.6%* |
| 2008 | NY | 1770 | 4.00 | Unknown | Hispanic | 58.6% |
| 2008 | CA | 1640 | 3.67 | Top 10% | None Indicated | 29.1% |
| 2008 | MN | 1430 | 3.93 | Top 5% | African-American | 99.4% |
| 2008 | FL | 30 | 3.71 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 83.3% |
| 2008 | FL | 35 | 3.98 | Top 1% | South Asian | 98.8% |
| 2008 | IL | 34 | 3.64 | Unknown | Other | 94.0% |
| 2008 | FL | 33 | 3.90 | Top 5% | South Asian | 92.5%* |
| 2008 | IL | 32 | 3.70 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 81.2%* |
| 2008 | SD | 32 | 4.00 | Valedictorian | Middle-Eastern | 96.8% |
| 2008 | IL | 31 | 4.00 | Top 1% | Caucasian | 90.7%* |
| 2008 | NY | 28 | 4.00 | Class Not Ranked | African-American | 75.7% |
| 2008 | IL | 19 | 3.00 | Top 10% | African-American | 3.5%* |
| 2007 | NY | 2350 | 3.70 | Unknown | None Indicated | 97.1% |
| 2007 | IL | 2290 | 3.82 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 97.6% |
| 2007 | NJ | 2260 | 3.89 | Top 5% | South Asian | 94.6%* |
| 2007 | NJ | 2220 | 4.00 | Top 1% | South Asian | 95.7%* |
| 2007 | NJ | 2220 | 3.88 | Top 10% | South Asian | 92.1%* |
| 2007 | NJ | 2180 | 3.90 | Unknown | None Indicated | 89.4%* |
| 2007 | CA | 2160 | 3.82 | Top 5% | East Asian | 89.4%* |
| 2007 | FL | 2100 | 4.00 | Unknown | Hispanic | 96.5%* |
| 2007 | NY | 2070 | 3.90 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 86.6%* |
| 2007 | NY | 2020 | 3.90 | Top 1% | Hispanic | 95.5%* |
| 2007 | CA | 2000 | 3.61 | Top 5% | East Asian | 66.3%* |
| 2007 | WA | 1950 | 3.95 | Top 5% | None Indicated | 79.4%* |
| 2007 | PA | 1930 | 3.70 | Top 10% | South Asian | 59.2%* |
| 2007 | CA | 1840 | 4.00 | Salutatorian | Hispanic | 91.6%* |
| 2007 | OH | 34 | 3.33 | Unknown | South Asian | 73.0%* |
| 2007 | TN | 34 | 4.00 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 96.1%* |
| 2007 | CA | 33 | 3.83 | Class Not Ranked | Other | 87.9%* |
| 2006 | CA | 2340 | 3.80 | Top 10% | East Asian | 94.7%* |
| 2006 | AK | 2330 | 4.00 | Valedictorian | East Asian | 98.6% |
| 2006 | CA | 2330 | 3.94 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 96.2%* |
| 2006 | CA | 2220 | 3.80 | Unknown | East Asian | 88.7%* |
| 2005 | TX | 2390 | 4.00 | Top 5% | East Asian | 98.0%* |
| 2003 | CA | 2040 | 3.78 | Top 5% | None Indicated | 79.7%* |
| 2002 | TX | 1530 | 4.00 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 96.7%* |
|
|
|
| 2009 | FL | 2310 | 3.67 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 96.8% |
| 2009 | (Private) | 2270 | 4.00 | Valedictorian | Other | 96.8%* |
| 2009 | XX | 2240 | 3.30 | Unknown | South Asian | 88.7% |
| 2009 | (Private) | 2200 | 3.90 | Class Not Ranked | East Asian | 94.0% |
| 2009 | XX | 2190 | 3.70 | Top 20% | East Asian | 63.4% |
| 2009 | NJ | 2160 | 3.30 | Unknown | East Asian | 19.6% |
| 2009 | GA | 2160 | 3.40 | Top 20% | East Asian | 80.4% |
| 2009 | NY | 2150 | 3.48 | Class Not Ranked | Middle-Eastern | 74.0% |
| 2009 | NY | 2140 | 3.54 | Top 20% | Other | 81.1% |
| 2009 | NJ | 2120 | 2.30 | Bottom 30% | Hispanic | 34.5% |
| 2009 | NJ | 2120 | 3.75 | Top 5% | East Asian | 48.4% |
| 2009 | CA | 2110 | 3.60 | Top 20% | East Asian | 20.8% |
| 2009 | NY | 2110 | 3.54 | Class Not Ranked | East Asian | 21.8% |
| 2009 | NJ | 2100 | 3.60 | Top 10% | East Asian | 39.3% |
| 2009 | CA | 2080 | 3.50 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 66.4% |
| 2009 | MD | 2080 | 3.87 | Top 20% | South Asian | 73.5% |
| 2009 | MO | 2080 | 3.38 | Class Not Ranked | None Indicated | 62.0% |
| 2009 | (Private) | 2060 | 3.33 | Class Not Ranked | South Asian | 15.9% |
| 2009 | NJ | 2050 | 3.40 | Class Not Ranked | South Asian | 17.8% |
| 2009 | CA | 2050 | 3.93 | Top 1% | Caucasian | 80.1% |
| 2009 | NJ | 2050 | 3.50 | Class Not Ranked | South Asian | 79.3% |
| 2009 | CO | 2040 | 3.47 | Top 20% | African-American | 88.7% |
| 2009 | NY | 2010 | 3.80 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 29.9% |
| 2009 | FL | 1990 | 3.90 | Top 5% | South Asian | 72.5% |
| 2009 | XX | 1980 | 3.95 | Top 1% | East Asian | 86.3% |
| 2009 | XX | 1970 | 3.80 | Class Not Ranked | South Asian | 50.7% |
| 2009 | PA | 1960 | 3.67 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 57.0%* |
| 2009 | TX | 1950 | 3.56 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 70.7% |
| 2009 | PA | 1940 | 3.42 | Top 20% | East Asian | 6.6% |
| 2009 | CT | 1880 | 2.90 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 23.4% |
| 2009 | PA | 1870 | 3.60 | Top 5% | South Asian | 48.3%* |
| 2009 | NY | 1870 | 4.00 | Top 10% | African-American | 74.0% |
| 2009 | XX | 1860 | 3.75 | Top 20% | Other | 9.0% |
| 2009 | NY | 1840 | 3.60 | Top 5% | Middle-Eastern | 9.8% |
| 2009 | CA | 1830 | 3.76 | Top 5% | East Asian | 78.1% |
| 2009 | MD | 1830 | 3.48 | Unknown | Caucasian | 48.5% |
| 2009 | MD | 1820 | 3.46 | Top 30% | South Asian | 24.5% |
| 2009 | NY | 1820 | 3.55 | Top 10% | East Asian | 34.1% |
| 2009 | NY | 1810 | 3.00 | Unknown | Hispanic | 55.7% |
| 2009 | CA | 1800 | 3.15 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 10.4% |
| 2009 | NY | 1790 | 4.00 | Top 1% | East Asian | 8.1% |
| 2009 | MA | 1770 | 3.35 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 17.4%* |
| 2009 | (Private) | 1750 | 3.80 | Top 20% | African-American | 47.7% |
| 2009 | NC | 1740 | 2.70 | Top 40% | African-American | 11.8% |
| 2009 | NJ | 1710 | 3.66 | Top 30% | Middle-Eastern | 22.5% |
| 2009 | CA | 1680 | 2.82 | Unknown | African-American | 10.3% |
| 2009 | TX | 1670 | 3.70 | Top 10% | African-American | 58.0% |
| 2009 | NC | 1640 | 3.30 | Top 30% | African-American | 14.3% |
| 2009 | (Private) | 1590 | 3.80 | Unknown | Caucasian | 17.7% |
| 2009 | NY | 1560 | 3.50 | Top 5% | South Asian | 10.4% |
| 2009 | FL | 1000 | 2.90 | Unknown | Caucasian | 1.3%* |
| 2009 | VA | 33 | 3.75 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 84.6% |
| 2009 | TX | 30 | 3.20 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 32.0%* |
| 2009 | KS | 28 | 3.92 | Top 5% | East Asian | 60.5% |
| 2009 | MI | 28 | 3.15 | Unknown | Caucasian | 17.6%* |
| 2009 | (Private) | 24 | 3.93 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 30.7% |
| 2008 | NJ | 2240 | 3.34 | Top 30% | East Asian | 59.6%* |
| 2008 | PA | 2190 | 3.50 | Top 20% | East Asian | 79.1% |
| 2008 | PA | 2190 | 3.52 | Top 20% | East Asian | 79.5% |
| 2008 | CA | 2170 | 3.69 | Top 20% | East Asian | 41.4% |
| 2008 | CA | 2130 | 3.25 | Bottom 40% | Caucasian | 28.1% |
| 2008 | CA | 2130 | 3.94 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 93.6% |
| 2008 | GA | 2090 | 3.40 | Bottom 40% | Caucasian | 39.6% |
| 2008 | NY | 2080 | 3.30 | Class Not Ranked | South Asian | 76.3% |
| 2008 | NY | 2060 | 3.70 | Unknown | Middle-Eastern | 67.8% |
| 2008 | MA | 2050 | 3.30 | Unknown | Hispanic | 74.5%* |
| 2008 | CT | 2050 | 3.40 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 46.2%* |
| 2008 | CA | 2030 | 3.36 | Top 20% | East Asian | 41.1%* |
| 2008 | CA | 2020 | 3.50 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 78.3% |
| 2008 | CA | 2020 | 3.73 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 64.8%* |
| 2008 | NJ | 2010 | 3.20 | Top 40% | Hispanic | 64.5% |
| 2008 | NC | 1990 | 2.76 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 24.0% |
| 2008 | NY | 1990 | 3.20 | Top 20% | South Asian | 26.8% |
| 2008 | RI | 1980 | 3.70 | Top 5% | None Indicated | 69.3%* |
| 2008 | PA | 1970 | 3.85 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 68.2% |
| 2008 | NJ | 1960 | 4.00 | Valedictorian | None Indicated | 80.2% |
| 2008 | CA | 1930 | 4.00 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 79.0%* |
| 2008 | OH | 1920 | 3.53 | Unknown | Caucasian | 42.0%* |
| 2008 | ID | 1900 | 3.90 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 51.4% |
| 2008 | (Private) | 1890 | 3.75 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 74.1% |
| 2008 | CA | 1890 | 3.70 | Top 20% | None Indicated | 32.8% |
| 2008 | IL | 1870 | 4.00 | Salutatorian | Caucasian | 77.2%* |
| 2008 | (Private) | 1810 | 3.81 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 42.6% |
| 2008 | CA | 1790 | 3.70 | Top 10% | South Asian | 38.5% |
| 2008 | MD | 1760 | 3.48 | Unknown | Caucasian | 27.9%* |
| 2008 | AZ | 1760 | 2.70 | Unknown | African-American | 33.7% |
| 2008 | CA | 1680 | 3.30 | Top 10% | Middle-Eastern | 8.7% |
| 2008 | XX | 1650 | 3.93 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 29.1% |
| 2008 | CA | 1610 | 3.71 | Top 5% | African-American | 43.7% |
| 2008 | GA | 1580 | 3.50 | Bottom 50% | Caucasian | 3.2%* |
| 2008 | XX | 1540 | 3.97 | Top 10% | East Asian | 18.3% |
| 2008 | MI | 30 | 3.97 | Salutatorian | Caucasian | 87.0%* |
| 2008 | NY | 29 | 3.95 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 59.7% |
| 2008 | WI | 27 | 3.55 | Top 40% | None Indicated | 16.9%* |
| 2008 | MI | 24 | 3.43 | Top 40% | South Asian | 6.7% |
| 2007 | CA | 2070 | 3.20 | Class Not Ranked | East Asian | 39.4%* |
| 2007 | VA | 2020 | 3.20 | Top 20% | South Asian | 29.5%* |
| 2007 | NY | 1920 | 3.65 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 58.5%* |
| 2007 | NY | 1670 | 3.97 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 47.3%* |
| 2007 | NM | 27 | 3.80 | Top 10% | Native American | 81.0%* |
| 2006 | CT | 1740 | 3.00 | Class Not Ranked | Other | 5.8%* |
| 2003 | CA | 1420 | 3.20 | Top 30% | East Asian | 35.3%* |
| 2002 | (Private) | 1200 | 3.00 | Unknown | African-American | 24.6%* |
| 2001 | CA | 2080 | 3.80 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 85.3% |
| |