Muhlenberg College Applications and Decisions
Below is a list of applicants who have demonstrated interest in Muhlenberg College. Our best formula
for this college is based on
15 members who were accepted or rejected. The formula
has a college admissions prediction accuracy of
100%?.
Because not all members have filled out the most recent version of our survey, some predictions are made based on
less-accurate models. Those are noted with an asterisk (*) next to their prediction.
|
| 2009 | NY | 30 | 3.70 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 100.0% |
|
| 2009 | NJ | 2100 | 3.70 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 100.0% |
| 2009 | CT | 1980 | 3.80 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 100.0% |
| 2009 | ME | 1960 | 3.72 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 100.0% |
| 2009 | NJ | 1950 | 3.30 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 100.0% |
| 2009 | MD | 1860 | 3.50 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 100.0% |
| 2009 | NY | 1850 | 3.00 | Class Not Ranked | Hispanic | 100.0% |
| 2009 | PA | 1830 | 3.85 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 100.0% |
| 2008 | NY | 2290 | 3.96 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 100.0% |
| 2008 | NJ | 2070 | 3.70 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 100.0% |
| 2008 | NY | 2040 | 3.80 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 100.0% |
| 2008 | CT | 1930 | 3.78 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 100.0% |
| 2003 | NY | 2190 | 3.72 | Unknown | Caucasian | 100.0% |
| 2003 | NJ | 1420 | 3.80 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 100.0% |
|
| 2009 | MA | 1880 | 2.69 | Bottom 40% | Caucasian | 100.0% |
| 2009 | NY | 1860 | 3.40 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 100.0% |
|
| 2010 | NY | 2010 | 3.79 | Top 2% | Caucasian | 100.0% |
| 2010 | NJ | 1860 | 3.60 | Top 25% | Caucasian | 100.0% |
| 2010 | NY | 29 | 3.65 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 100.0% |
| 2009 | NJ | 2140 | 3.84 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 100.0% |
| 2009 | NY | 2090 | 3.96 | Top 5% | South Asian | 100.0% |
| 2009 | NY | 2070 | 3.40 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 100.0% |
| 2009 | NY | 2040 | 3.50 | Unknown | Caucasian | 100.0% |
| 2009 | PA | 2040 | 3.70 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 100.0% |
| 2009 | PA | 2040 | 3.68 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 100.0% |
| 2009 | NJ | 1830 | 3.50 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 100.0% |
| 2009 | NJ | 1810 | 3.40 | Top 30% | Caucasian | 100.0% |
| 2009 | SC | 1700 | 3.12 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 99.9% |
| 2009 | NY | 28 | 3.40 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 100.0% |
| 2008 | NJ | 1980 | 3.02 | Unknown | Caucasian | 100.0% |
| 2008 | PA | 1910 | 3.45 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 100.0% |
|
| 2011 | PA | 2100 | 3.90 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 100.0% |
| 2011 | RI | 1820 | 2.84 | Unknown | Caucasian | 99.9% |
| 2011 | NY | 1800 | 3.50 | Top 30% | Caucasian | 100.0% |
| 2011 | PA | 1650 | 3.50 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 100.0% |
| 2010 | IL | 2260 | 3.83 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 100.0% |
| 2010 | PA | 2240 | 3.97 | Salutatorian | Caucasian | 100.0% |
| 2010 | NJ | 2230 | 4.00 | Top 2% | Caucasian | 100.0% |
| 2010 | NJ | 2230 | 3.60 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 100.0% |
| 2010 | NJ | 2180 | 3.95 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 100.0% |
| 2010 | MA | 2170 | 3.76 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 100.0% |
| 2010 | NY | 2110 | 3.72 | Unknown | Caucasian | 100.0% |
| 2010 | MN | 2060 | 2.80 | Bottom 50% | Caucasian | 100.0% |
| 2010 | WI | 2020 | 3.86 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 100.0% |
| 2010 | NY | 2020 | 2.92 | Class Not Ranked | None Indicated | 100.0% |
| 2010 | CT | 2010 | 3.70 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 100.0% |
| 2010 | NJ | 2010 | 3.30 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 100.0% |
| 2010 | NJ | 2010 | 3.20 | Unknown | Caucasian | 100.0% |
| 2010 | (Private) | 1990 | 3.69 | Top 15% | Caucasian | 100.0% |
| 2010 | NY | 1990 | 3.40 | Top 15% | Caucasian | 100.0% |
| 2010 | (Private) | 1950 | 3.00 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 100.0% |
| 2010 | PA | 1940 | 3.60 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 100.0% |
| 2010 | CA | 1940 | 4.00 | Salutatorian | Caucasian | 100.0% |
| 2010 | NY | 1930 | 3.00 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 100.0% |
| 2010 | NJ | 1920 | 3.90 | Top 3% | Caucasian | 100.0% |
| 2010 | NY | 1910 | 3.60 | Top 20% | Other | 100.0% |
| 2010 | PA | 1900 | 3.70 | Top 20% | East Asian | 100.0% |
| 2010 | MD | 1870 | 3.10 | Bottom 50% | None Indicated | 100.0% |
| 2010 | NC | 1830 | 3.19 | Bottom 50% | Other | 100.0% |
| 2010 | NY | 1810 | 3.70 | Top 15% | Caucasian | 100.0% |
| 2010 | RI | 1740 | 3.50 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 100.0% |
| 2010 | NJ | 1700 | 3.63 | Unknown | Caucasian | 100.0% |
| 2010 | NJ | 1690 | 2.20 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 99.8% |
| 2010 | FL | 1640 | 3.34 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 100.0% |
| 2010 | PA | 1640 | 3.88 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 100.0% |
| 2010 | NJ | 1570 | 3.52 | Top 30% | Caucasian | 100.0% |
| 2010 | NY | 1520 | 3.60 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 100.0% |
| 2010 | NJ | 1440 | 3.86 | Top 25% | Caucasian | 100.0% |
| 2010 | NY | 34 | 3.84 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 100.0% |
| 2010 | NY | 27 | 3.50 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 100.0% |
| 2010 | NY | 27 | 3.50 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 100.0% |
| 2009 | NY | 2160 | 3.80 | Class Not Ranked | East Asian | 100.0% |
| 2009 | NJ | 2140 | 4.00 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 100.0% |
| 2009 | NJ | 2080 | 3.20 | Top 30% | Caucasian | 100.0% |
| 2009 | NJ | 2070 | 3.75 | Top 30% | Caucasian | 100.0% |
| 2009 | NJ | 2040 | 3.83 | Top 1% | Caucasian | 100.0% |
| 2009 | NY | 2030 | 3.00 | Top 40% | Caucasian | 100.0% |
| 2009 | CA | 2000 | 3.10 | Unknown | Caucasian | 100.0% |
| 2009 | CT | 1990 | 3.70 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 100.0% |
| 2009 | PA | 1930 | 3.80 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 100.0% |
| 2009 | NJ | 1910 | 3.75 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 100.0% |
| 2009 | NJ | 1900 | 2.40 | Class Not Ranked | Native American | 99.9% |
| 2009 | XX | 1890 | 3.60 | Top 5% | South Asian | 100.0% |
| 2009 | FL | 1880 | 3.64 | Top 20% | Hispanic | 100.0% |
| 2009 | NJ | 1860 | 3.60 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 100.0% |
| 2009 | ME | 1800 | 3.30 | Bottom 50% | Caucasian | 100.0% |
| 2009 | NY | 1800 | 3.75 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 100.0% |
| 2009 | NJ | 1780 | 3.60 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 100.0% |
| 2009 | FL | 1760 | 2.90 | Top 30% | Caucasian | 100.0% |
| 2009 | (Private) | 1750 | 3.60 | Top 30% | Caucasian | 100.0% |
| 2009 | NY | 1700 | 3.00 | Top 40% | Caucasian | 100.0% |
| 2009 | PA | 1680 | 4.00 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 100.0% |
| 2009 | (Private) | 1660 | 3.70 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 100.0% |
| 2009 | NJ | 1620 | 3.60 | Unknown | Caucasian | 100.0% |
| 2009 | NY | 1560 | 3.50 | Unknown | Caucasian | 100.0% |
| 2009 | NJ | 1380 | 2.99 | Class Not Ranked | Other | 99.9% |
| 2009 | (Private) | 32 | 3.30 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 100.0% |
| 2009 | (Private) | 26 | 3.60 | Unknown | Caucasian | 100.0% |
| 2009 | NY | 26 | 3.65 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 100.0% |
| 2009 | PA | 24 | 3.60 | Top 40% | Caucasian | 100.0% |
| 2008 | NY | 2130 | 3.90 | Unknown | None Indicated | 100.0% |
| 2008 | PA | 2030 | 3.50 | Unknown | Caucasian | 100.0% |
| 2008 | NY | 2000 | 3.60 | Unknown | Caucasian | 100.0% |
| 2008 | MD | 1990 | 3.88 | Class Not Ranked | None Indicated | 100.0% |
| 2008 | NY | 1970 | 4.00 | Unknown | Caucasian | 100.0% |
| 2008 | CA | 1940 | 3.85 | Class Not Ranked | Other | 100.0% |
| 2008 | MA | 1910 | 3.40 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 100.0% |
| 2008 | NJ | 1880 | 3.80 | Top 20% | None Indicated | 100.0% |
| 2008 | NJ | 1800 | 3.70 | Unknown | Caucasian | 100.0% |
| 2008 | NJ | 1780 | 3.00 | Bottom 50% | Caucasian | 100.0% |
| 2008 | PA | 1360 | 2.40 | Unknown | Caucasian | 99.7% |
| 2008 | CT | 32 | 3.80 | Unknown | None Indicated | 100.0% |
| 2008 | MA | 28 | 3.65 | Top 10% | None Indicated | 100.0% |
| 2008 | (Private) | 27 | 3.15 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 100.0% |
| 2008 | MN | 26 | 3.30 | Top 30% | Caucasian | 100.0% |
| 2007 | PA | 2050 | 3.61 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 100.0% |
| 2007 | NJ | 1380 | 3.00 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 100.0% |
| |