Miami University Applications and Decisions
Below is a list of applicants who have demonstrated interest in Miami University. Our best formula for this college is based on members who were accepted or rejected. The formula has a college admissions prediction accuracy of %?. Because not all members have filled out the most recent version of our survey, some predictions are made based on less-accurate models. Those are noted with an asterisk (*) next to their prediction.
This is a very popular school, so we're only showing you profiles that have received an admissions decision.
Recent Admissions Results from 438 Members |
|||||||
Member |
Year Entering |
State |
SAT/ACT |
GPA |
Class Rank |
Ethnic Heritage |
Prediction ? |
| Accepted And Attending (3) | |||||||
| 2010 | OH | 1870 | 3.02 | Top 25% | Caucasian | ||
| 2010 | NJ | 1860 | 3.50 | Top 10% | Caucasian | ||
| 2009 | IL | 32 | 4.00 | Top 10% | Caucasian | ||
| Accepted (87) | |||||||
| 2010 | OH | 2300 | 3.95 | Top 2% | Caucasian | ||
| 2010 | CA | 2230 | 3.60 | Top 40% | Caucasian | ||
| 2010 | OH | 2150 | 3.85 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | ||
| 2010 | OH | 2140 | 3.96 | Salutatorian | None Indicated | ||
| 2010 | VA | 2130 | 3.90 | Top 5% | Caucasian | ||
| 2010 | OH | 2120 | 3.95 | Top 1% | Caucasian | ||
| 2010 | OH | 2110 | 4.00 | Top 3% | Caucasian | ||
| 2010 | MA | 2050 | 2.90 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | ||
| 2010 | FL | 2030 | 3.90 | Top 2% | Caucasian | ||
| 2010 | OH | 2020 | 3.45 | Top 30% | Caucasian | ||
| 2010 | CA | 1950 | 3.00 | Class Not Ranked | Middle-Eastern | ||
| 2010 | CA | 1940 | 3.64 | Top 10% | Caucasian | ||
| 2010 | NY | 1930 | 3.50 | Top 40% | Caucasian | ||
| 2010 | NY | 1930 | 3.30 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | ||
| 2010 | OH | 1910 | 3.30 | Top 20% | Caucasian | ||
| 2010 | CA | 1910 | 3.40 | Top 25% | Caucasian | ||
| 2010 | GA | 1900 | 3.90 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | ||
| 2010 | (Private) | 1870 | 3.80 | Top 10% | Hispanic | ||
| 2010 | OH | 1870 | 4.00 | Top 10% | Caucasian | ||
| 2010 | CA | 1860 | 3.50 | Unknown | Hispanic | ||
| 2010 | XX | 1840 | 4.00 | Top 2% | South Asian | ||
| 2010 | CA | 1840 | 3.26 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | ||
| 2010 | NY | 1810 | 3.47 | Bottom 50% | Caucasian | ||
| 2010 | OH | 1800 | 3.60 | Top 20% | Caucasian | ||
| 2010 | CA | 1790 | 3.50 | Unknown | Caucasian | ||
| 2010 | XX | 1750 | 3.38 | Class Not Ranked | South Asian | ||
| 2010 | (Private) | 1720 | 3.50 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | ||
| 2010 | FL | 1650 | 3.78 | Top 2% | Caucasian | ||
| 2010 | NJ | 1620 | 3.30 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | ||
| 2010 | IL | 33 | 3.40 | Top 40% | Caucasian | ||
| 2010 | NY | 32 | 3.76 | Unknown | Caucasian | ||
| 2010 | FL | 31 | 3.80 | Unknown | None Indicated | ||
| 2010 | AR | 31 | 4.00 | Top 4% | Caucasian | ||
| 2010 | IL | 31 | 3.98 | Top 10% | Caucasian | ||
| 2010 | VA | 30 | 3.62 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | ||
| 2010 | IL | 30 | 3.40 | Top 40% | Caucasian | ||
| 2010 | OH | 30 | 3.93 | Top 10% | Hispanic | ||
| 2010 | WA | 30 | 3.86 | Top 15% | Caucasian | ||
| 2010 | OH | 29 | 4.00 | Top 3% | None Indicated | ||
| 2010 | TN | 29 | 3.96 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | ||
| 2010 | NY | 29 | 2.80 | Class Not Ranked | South Asian | ||
| 2010 | IL | 28 | 3.40 | Top 20% | Caucasian | ||
| 2010 | IL | 28 | 3.33 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | ||
| 2010 | OH | 27 | 3.62 | Top 20% | Caucasian | ||
| 2010 | OH | 27 | 3.61 | Top 20% | Caucasian | ||
| 2010 | OH | 26 | 3.20 | Unknown | Caucasian | ||
| 2010 | OH | 25 | 3.30 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | ||
| 2010 | OH | 24 | 2.98 | Top 20% | African-American | ||
| 2010 | OH | 23 | 3.19 | Class Not Ranked | African-American | ||
| 2009 | OH | 2300 | 4.00 | Valedictorian | Hispanic | ||
| 2009 | OH | 2200 | 3.91 | Top 10% | Caucasian | ||
| 2009 | OH | 2140 | 4.00 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | ||
| 2009 | WI | 2130 | 4.00 | Top 1% | East Asian | ||
| 2009 | OH | 2120 | 4.00 | Valedictorian | Caucasian | ||
| 2009 | CT | 2110 | 3.80 | Class Not Ranked | Hispanic | ||
| 2009 | IN | 2010 | 4.00 | Top 10% | Caucasian | ||
| 2009 | NY | 2000 | 3.80 | Top 10% | Caucasian | ||
| 2009 | CT | 2000 | 3.00 | Class Not Ranked | East Asian | ||
| 2009 | OH | 1950 | 3.20 | Top 20% | Caucasian | ||
| 2009 | OH | 1920 | 3.69 | Top 10% | Caucasian | ||
| 2009 | OH | 1910 | 3.30 | Top 30% | Caucasian | ||
| 2009 | NJ | 1900 | 3.40 | Bottom 50% | Caucasian | ||
| 2009 | OH | 1880 | 3.75 | Unknown | East Asian | ||
| 2009 | OH | 1860 | 3.83 | Top 10% | Caucasian | ||
| 2009 | OH | 1860 | 2.80 | Class Not Ranked | African-American | ||
| 2009 | OH | 1840 | 3.65 | Class Not Ranked | South Asian | ||
| 2009 | (Private) | 1700 | 3.70 | Top 30% | Caucasian | ||
| 2009 | OH | 1620 | 3.20 | Top 20% | African-American | ||
| 2009 | IL | 32 | 3.32 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | ||
| 2009 | OH | 31 | 3.80 | Top 5% | Caucasian | ||
| 2009 | MI | 30 | 3.74 | Top 10% | Caucasian | ||
| 2008 | IN | 2350 | 4.00 | Valedictorian | Caucasian | ||
| 2008 | KY | 2230 | 3.55 | Top 10% | Caucasian | ||
| 2008 | IN | 2010 | 3.95 | Top 5% | Caucasian | ||
| 2008 | NY | 2000 | 3.30 | Top 40% | Caucasian | ||
| 2008 | VT | 1970 | 3.30 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | ||
| 2008 | OH | 1920 | 3.53 | Unknown | Caucasian | ||
| 2008 | IL | 1890 | 3.31 | Unknown | Hispanic | ||
| 2008 | NY | 1860 | 3.05 | Unknown | Caucasian | ||
| 2008 | NJ | 1630 | 3.08 | Bottom 40% | Caucasian | ||
| 2008 | OH | 33 | 4.00 | Top 5% | Caucasian | ||
| 2008 | MO | 31 | 4.00 | Top 1% | Caucasian | ||
| 2008 | MO | 31 | 4.00 | Top 1% | Caucasian | ||
| 2008 | MO | 29 | 3.50 | Top 30% | Caucasian | ||
| 2008 | FL | 29 | 3.70 | Top 5% | Caucasian | ||
| 2007 | OH | 1960 | 3.75 | Unknown | Caucasian | ||
| 2007 | MI | 1830 | 3.83 | Unknown | Caucasian | ||
| Denied Admission (2) | |||||||
| 2010 | OH | 1620 | 3.20 | Top 35% | Caucasian | ||
| 2009 | CT | 21 | 2.92 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | ||