Marymount Manhattan College Applications and Decisions
Below is a list of applicants who have demonstrated interest in Marymount Manhattan College. Our best formula for this college is based on members who were accepted or rejected. The formula has a college admissions prediction accuracy of %?. Because not all members have filled out the most recent version of our survey, some predictions are made based on less-accurate models. Those are noted with an asterisk (*) next to their prediction.
Recent Admissions Results from 79 Members |
|||||||
Member |
Year Entering |
State |
SAT/ACT |
GPA |
Class Rank |
Ethnic Heritage |
Prediction ? |
| Accepted And Attending (3) | |||||||
| 2008 | CA | 1910 | 3.60 | Unknown | Caucasian | ||
| 2008 | CA | 1780 | 3.50 | Top 20% | Caucasian | ||
| 2007 | PA | 1670 | 3.70 | Bottom 50% | Caucasian | ||
| Accepted (21) | |||||||
| 2010 | VA | 2130 | 3.00 | Top 35% | Caucasian | ||
| 2010 | VA | 2130 | 3.00 | Top 25% | Caucasian | ||
| 2010 | MI | 2080 | 3.50 | Class Not Ranked | Hispanic | ||
| 2010 | NC | 1960 | 3.15 | Class Not Ranked | African-American | ||
| 2010 | CT | 1910 | 2.80 | Unknown | Caucasian | ||
| 2010 | XX | 1900 | 3.70 | Unknown | South Asian | ||
| 2010 | NJ | 1820 | 3.72 | Top 30% | Caucasian | ||
| 2010 | FL | 1760 | 3.30 | Top 20% | Hispanic | ||
| 2010 | NJ | 1730 | 3.70 | Top 25% | Hispanic | ||
| 2010 | NJ | 1610 | 3.02 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | ||
| 2010 | RI | 1610 | 2.80 | Top 35% | East Asian | ||
| 2010 | NC | 1560 | 3.50 | Unknown | Caucasian | ||
| 2010 | NY | 28 | 3.32 | Top 25% | Caucasian | ||
| 2010 | (Private) | 27 | 3.30 | Top 20% | East Asian | ||
| 2009 | FL | 2100 | 3.65 | Top 20% | Caucasian | ||
| 2009 | NH | 1730 | 2.70 | Top 40% | Caucasian | ||
| 2009 | NY | 1450 | 3.63 | Top 20% | Hispanic | ||
| 2008 | CA | 1890 | 3.70 | Top 20% | None Indicated | ||
| 2008 | NY | 1820 | 3.80 | Top 20% | African-American | ||
| 2007 | FL | 1800 | 2.60 | Unknown | Caucasian | ||
| 2007 | CT | 1190 | 3.47 | Unknown | Caucasian | ||
| Applied (3) | |||||||
| 2009 | NJ | 1890 | 2.70 | Top 40% | Caucasian | ||
| 2008 | GA | 2090 | 3.40 | Bottom 40% | Caucasian | ||
| 2008 | CT | 1500 | 3.10 | Bottom 50% | Caucasian | ||
| Applying (52) | |||||||
| 2011 | NJ | 2160 | 3.92 | Top 5% | Other | ||
| 2011 | MD | 1980 | 2.75 | Top 25% | Caucasian | ||
| 2011 | AL | 1960 | 3.20 | Top 35% | Caucasian | ||
| 2011 | PA | 1920 | 3.50 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | ||
| 2011 | NJ | 1890 | 3.20 | Unknown | Hispanic | ||
| 2011 | MD | 1790 | 3.40 | Unknown | Caucasian | ||
| 2011 | CT | 1740 | 3.25 | Top 10% | Caucasian | ||
| 2011 | NJ | 1590 | 3.80 | Top 15% | Caucasian | ||
| 2011 | CA | 1570 | 3.60 | Top 15% | African-American | ||
| 2011 | CT | 1540 | 2.50 | Unknown | Caucasian | ||
| 2011 | FL | 1520 | 3.00 | Unknown | Hispanic | ||
| 2011 | MD | 1160 | 2.79 | Bottom 50% | African-American | ||
| 2011 | MA | 1070 | 3.90 | Top 1% | Caucasian | ||
| 2011 | CA | 22 | 3.00 | Unknown | Caucasian | ||
| 2010 | CA | 1940 | 3.80 | Class Not Ranked | South Asian | ||
| 2010 | CA | 1940 | 3.54 | Unknown | Hispanic | ||
| 2010 | NY | 1900 | 3.76 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | ||
| 2010 | PA | 1890 | 3.80 | Top 10% | Caucasian | ||
| 2010 | (Private) | 1850 | 3.40 | Top 10% | Caucasian | ||
| 2010 | MA | 1800 | 3.70 | Bottom 50% | None Indicated | ||
| 2010 | FL | 1790 | 3.50 | Top 15% | South Asian | ||
| 2010 | CA | 1640 | 3.95 | Top 5% | Hispanic | ||
| 2010 | MD | 1640 | 3.60 | Top 30% | African-American | ||
| 2010 | VA | 1540 | 3.00 | Top 40% | African-American | ||
| 2010 | NY | 1430 | 3.80 | Top 2% | Caucasian | ||
| 2010 | MA | 1410 | 2.60 | Class Not Ranked | African-American | ||
| 2010 | NY | 1260 | 3.40 | Top 30% | Caucasian | ||
| 2010 | CT | 1230 | 2.80 | Unknown | Other | ||
| 2010 | NY | 31 | 3.70 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | ||
| 2010 | LA | 28 | 3.60 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | ||
| 2010 | GA | 24 | 3.45 | Top 20% | African-American | ||
| 2010 | OR | 21 | 3.00 | Top 40% | Caucasian | ||
| 2009 | MA | 2020 | 3.60 | Unknown | Hispanic | ||
| 2009 | VA | 1950 | 3.24 | Top 40% | Caucasian | ||
| 2009 | FL | 1880 | 3.75 | Top 10% | Caucasian | ||
| 2009 | PA | 1870 | 3.60 | Top 5% | South Asian | ||
| 2009 | CA | 1860 | 3.50 | Unknown | Caucasian | ||
| 2009 | FL | 1860 | 3.00 | Top 30% | Hispanic | ||
| 2009 | DE | 1780 | 3.50 | Top 20% | Hispanic | ||
| 2009 | VA | 1700 | 3.30 | Unknown | Caucasian | ||
| 2009 | IA | 1630 | 2.80 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | ||
| 2009 | NJ | 1520 | 2.50 | Bottom 40% | Caucasian | ||
| 2009 | NJ | 1500 | 2.00 | Bottom 50% | Caucasian | ||
| 2009 | CA | 1340 | 2.89 | Class Not Ranked | Hispanic | ||
| 2009 | NY | 1320 | 3.70 | Top 10% | Hispanic | ||
| 2009 | IA | 23 | 3.85 | Top 10% | Caucasian | ||
| 2008 | FL | 2100 | 3.10 | Class Not Ranked | Hispanic | ||
| 2008 | TX | 1820 | 3.50 | Top 20% | Other | ||
| 2008 | NY | 1560 | 3.70 | Top 5% | Caucasian | ||
| 2007 | NY | 1830 | 3.40 | Top 5% | None Indicated | ||
| 2007 | FL | 1800 | 2.54 | Unknown | Caucasian | ||
| 2007 | NM | 20 | 3.10 | Top 40% | Hispanic | ||