James Madison University Applications and Decisions
Below is a list of applicants who have demonstrated interest in James Madison University. Our best formula
for this college is based on
92 members who were accepted or rejected. The formula
has a college admissions prediction accuracy of
96%?.
Because not all members have filled out the most recent version of our survey, some predictions are made based on
less-accurate models. Those are noted with an asterisk (*) next to their prediction.
This is a very popular school, so we're only showing you profiles that have received an admissions decision. If you
want to see all applicants to this school,
click here (caution: the page will take awhile to load).
|
| 2010 | VA | 2000 | 3.78 | Unknown | Caucasian | 99.0%* |
| 2009 | VA | 1960 | 3.60 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 98.3%* |
| 2009 | MD | 1910 | 3.83 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 97.7%* |
| 2009 | (Private) | 1820 | 3.60 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 100.0% |
| 2009 | VA | 1760 | 3.36 | Unknown | None Indicated | 88.1%* |
| 2009 | NJ | 1710 | 3.20 | Unknown | Caucasian | 79.9%* |
| 2009 | VA | 1510 | 3.51 | Top 30% | Caucasian | 82.4%* |
| 2009 | (Private) | 1500 | 3.40 | Unknown | East Asian | 48.4% |
| 2008 | VA | 1880 | 4.00 | Top 1% | Caucasian | 100.0% |
| 2008 | VA | 1750 | 4.00 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 93.4%* |
|
| 2011 | VA | 2010 | 3.90 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 99.9% |
| 2010 | VA | 2400 | 4.00 | Top 15% | Hispanic | 99.7%* |
| 2010 | NJ | 2400 | 4.00 | Valedictorian | Hispanic | 100.0% |
| 2010 | GA | 2370 | 3.30 | Top 25% | South Asian | 100.0% |
| 2010 | VA | 2200 | 3.84 | Top 2% | Caucasian | 100.0% |
| 2010 | (Private) | 2180 | 3.90 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 100.0% |
| 2010 | VA | 2150 | 3.65 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 100.0% |
| 2010 | VA | 2150 | 4.00 | Top 1% | Caucasian | 100.0% |
| 2010 | MD | 2150 | 3.90 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 99.8%* |
| 2010 | VA | 2130 | 3.83 | Top 2% | South Asian | 100.0% |
| 2010 | VA | 2060 | 3.41 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 99.4%* |
| 2010 | VA | 2060 | 4.00 | Top 3% | Caucasian | 100.0% |
| 2010 | VA | 2050 | 3.98 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 100.0% |
| 2010 | VA | 2040 | 3.68 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 100.0% |
| 2010 | PA | 2030 | 3.90 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 100.0% |
| 2010 | VA | 2020 | 3.80 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 100.0% |
| 2010 | NJ | 2010 | 3.40 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 99.8% |
| 2010 | PA | 2010 | 3.70 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 100.0% |
| 2010 | FL | 2000 | 3.87 | Unknown | Caucasian | 100.0% |
| 2010 | VA | 2000 | 3.93 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 100.0% |
| 2010 | VA | 1990 | 3.87 | Top 4% | Caucasian | 100.0% |
| 2010 | VA | 1980 | 3.77 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 99.8% |
| 2010 | VA | 1970 | 3.50 | Unknown | Caucasian | 99.8% |
| 2010 | VA | 1960 | 3.50 | Top 30% | Caucasian | 99.9% |
| 2010 | VA | 1930 | 3.90 | Unknown | Caucasian | 99.9% |
| 2010 | FL | 1930 | 3.42 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 96.8%* |
| 2010 | MD | 1920 | 3.38 | Bottom 50% | Caucasian | 93.2%* |
| 2010 | NJ | 1910 | 3.25 | Top 40% | None Indicated | 93.1%* |
| 2010 | (Private) | 1890 | 3.54 | Top 5% | None Indicated | 99.7% |
| 2010 | (Private) | 1870 | 3.80 | Top 10% | Hispanic | 95.0%* |
| 2010 | VA | 1860 | 3.60 | Unknown | Caucasian | 95.8%* |
| 2010 | VA | 1830 | 3.93 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 100.0% |
| 2010 | PA | 1830 | 3.36 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 93.0%* |
| 2010 | NC | 1830 | 3.19 | Bottom 40% | Other | 80.3%* |
| 2010 | NY | 1830 | 3.00 | Top 40% | Caucasian | 83.5%* |
| 2010 | VA | 1820 | 3.90 | Unknown | Caucasian | 99.9% |
| 2010 | VA | 1810 | 3.90 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 95.9%* |
| 2010 | PA | 1790 | 3.29 | Top 30% | Caucasian | 86.4%* |
| 2010 | NJ | 1730 | 3.75 | Top 25% | Caucasian | 99.5% |
| 2010 | VA | 1720 | 3.80 | Top 3% | South Asian | 99.3% |
| 2010 | VA | 1700 | 3.50 | Top 3% | Caucasian | 99.3% |
| 2010 | MD | 1680 | 3.88 | Top 30% | African-American | 74.3%* |
| 2010 | VA | 1680 | 3.50 | Top 15% | Caucasian | 81.4%* |
| 2010 | VA | 1680 | 3.50 | Top 25% | Caucasian | 77.9%* |
| 2010 | DE | 1610 | 3.40 | Top 25% | Caucasian | 63.4%* |
| 2010 | VA | 1570 | 3.60 | Top 15% | Hispanic | 20.3%* |
| 2010 | MD | 1220 | 3.30 | Top 40% | Caucasian | 87.8%* |
| 2010 | TN | 32 | 4.00 | Top 1% | Caucasian | 99.8%* |
| 2010 | VA | 30 | 3.62 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 100.0% |
| 2010 | WA | 30 | 3.86 | Top 15% | Caucasian | 100.0% |
| 2010 | VA | 28 | 3.50 | Top 15% | Caucasian | 96.3%* |
| 2009 | VA | 2370 | 3.91 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 100.0% |
| 2009 | VA | 2320 | 3.83 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 100.0% |
| 2009 | VA | 2240 | 4.00 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 100.0% |
| 2009 | VA | 2210 | 3.90 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 99.9%* |
| 2009 | VA | 2170 | 3.92 | Top 5% | Hispanic | 100.0% |
| 2009 | VA | 2160 | 4.00 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 100.0% |
| 2009 | PA | 2160 | 3.80 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 99.8%* |
| 2009 | NJ | 2050 | 3.83 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 100.0% |
| 2009 | VA | 2050 | 3.81 | Top 5% | East Asian | 100.0% |
| 2009 | VA | 2040 | 3.80 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 100.0% |
| 2009 | VA | 2020 | 3.70 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 100.0% |
| 2009 | MD | 2020 | 4.00 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 99.9% |
| 2009 | VA | 2020 | 3.80 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 100.0% |
| 2009 | VA | 2000 | 3.72 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 99.0%* |
| 2009 | VA | 1990 | 4.00 | Top 1% | None Indicated | 100.0% |
| 2009 | NJ | 1990 | 3.40 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 98.4%* |
| 2009 | VA | 1980 | 3.00 | Top 20% | South Asian | 94.5% |
| 2009 | (Private) | 1980 | 3.50 | Top 40% | Caucasian | 97.0%* |
| 2009 | VA | 1970 | 3.90 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 98.9%* |
| 2009 | VA | 1950 | 3.60 | Unknown | Caucasian | 99.8% |
| 2009 | NH | 1930 | 3.66 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 99.7% |
| 2009 | (Private) | 1920 | 3.39 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 97.3% |
| 2009 | XX | 1920 | 3.80 | Class Not Ranked | East Asian | 98.0%* |
| 2009 | VA | 1920 | 3.90 | Top 20% | East Asian | 100.0% |
| 2009 | MA | 1900 | 3.12 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 99.7% |
| 2009 | PA | 1880 | 3.70 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 96.5%* |
| 2009 | (Private) | 1880 | 3.42 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 95.2%* |
| 2009 | MD | 1880 | 3.62 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 96.2%* |
| 2009 | NY | 1880 | 3.65 | Top 30% | Caucasian | 88.9% |
| 2009 | VA | 1870 | 3.42 | Top 30% | Caucasian | 93.5%* |
| 2009 | NC | 1860 | 2.76 | Unknown | Caucasian | 89.5%* |
| 2009 | VA | 1840 | 3.75 | Top 10% | None Indicated | 98.5%* |
| 2009 | NJ | 1820 | 3.43 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 93.1%* |
| 2009 | VA | 1800 | 3.20 | Class Not Ranked | African-American | 45.5%* |
| 2009 | (Private) | 1790 | 3.45 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 96.9% |
| 2009 | VA | 1770 | 3.10 | Top 40% | Caucasian | 77.3%* |
| 2009 | VA | 1760 | 3.60 | Class Not Ranked | South Asian | 92.4% |
| 2009 | NY | 1720 | 3.00 | Class Not Ranked | Hispanic | 36.8%* |
| 2009 | VA | 1710 | 3.76 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 90.5%* |
| 2009 | (Private) | 1710 | 3.75 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 87.2%* |
| 2009 | MA | 1700 | 3.40 | Bottom 50% | Caucasian | 68.4%* |
| 2009 | VA | 1680 | 3.60 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 81.5%* |
| 2009 | PA | 1510 | 3.72 | Top 30% | Caucasian | 48.7%* |
| 2009 | VA | 33 | 3.75 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 100.0% |
| 2009 | MD | 28 | 3.81 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 97.1%* |
| 2009 | VA | 27 | 3.13 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 91.1%* |
| 2009 | VA | 26 | 3.50 | Unknown | Caucasian | 91.5%* |
| 2009 | OH | 26 | 3.00 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 85.6%* |
| 2008 | (Private) | 2400 | 4.00 | Class Not Ranked | East Asian | 100.0% |
| 2008 | VA | 2330 | 3.96 | Top 5% | East Asian | 100.0% |
| 2008 | VA | 2290 | 3.35 | Class Not Ranked | East Asian | 99.8%* |
| 2008 | VA | 2140 | 3.95 | Unknown | None Indicated | 100.0% |
| 2008 | VA | 2110 | 3.70 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 99.9% |
| 2008 | VA | 2100 | 3.00 | Unknown | Caucasian | 99.9% |
| 2008 | VA | 2070 | 3.93 | Top 5% | Other | 100.0% |
| 2008 | NY | 2040 | 3.80 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 99.7%* |
| 2008 | VA | 2010 | 4.00 | Top 1% | Caucasian | 100.0% |
| 2008 | MA | 1980 | 3.70 | Top 10% | None Indicated | 99.7% |
| 2008 | VA | 1960 | 3.70 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 99.6% |
| 2008 | VA | 1930 | 3.50 | Unknown | Caucasian | 99.5% |
| 2008 | (Private) | 1930 | 3.88 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 99.9% |
| 2008 | VA | 1920 | 3.40 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 99.6% |
| 2008 | NY | 1900 | 3.60 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 96.6%* |
| 2008 | VA | 1900 | 3.70 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 99.9% |
| 2008 | VA | 1890 | 3.76 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 99.8% |
| 2008 | VA | 1860 | 4.00 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 99.9% |
| 2008 | VA | 1860 | 4.00 | Top 1% | Caucasian | 99.7% |
| 2008 | VA | 1820 | 3.96 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 96.6%* |
| 2008 | VA | 1770 | 3.75 | Top 20% | Other | 100.0% |
| 2008 | VA | 1730 | 3.81 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 89.7%* |
| 2008 | VA | 31 | 3.91 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 99.5%* |
| 2007 | VA | 2080 | 3.95 | Top 1% | Caucasian | 99.7%* |
| 2007 | VA | 1950 | 3.82 | Unknown | South Asian | 98.5%* |
| 2007 | VA | 1730 | 3.58 | Top 10% | Other | 89.2%* |
| 2006 | VA | 2020 | 3.90 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 99.4%* |
| 2002 | VA | 1420 | 4.00 | Salutatorian | Caucasian | 99.9%* |
|
|
| 2009 | VA | 1850 | 3.30 | Class Not Ranked | Hispanic | 59.3%* |
| 2009 | MA | 1770 | 3.35 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 90.0%* |
| 2009 | VA | 1750 | 3.33 | Top 30% | Caucasian | 82.3%* |
| 2009 | VA | 1560 | 2.70 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 38.0%* |
| 2008 | VA | 1870 | 2.90 | Class Not Ranked | None Indicated | 91.5%* |
| 2008 | NH | 1630 | 2.85 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 56.8%* |
| 2008 | VA | 1610 | 3.00 | Class Not Ranked | South Asian | 57.4%* |
| 2008 | VA | 28 | 3.30 | Top 40% | Native American | 54.0%* |
| 2006 | VA | 1780 | 2.74 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 80.6%* |
| |