Ithaca College Applications and Decisions
Below is a list of applicants who have demonstrated interest in Ithaca College. Our best formula
for this college is based on
72 members who were accepted or rejected. The formula
has a college admissions prediction accuracy of
89%?.
Because not all members have filled out the most recent version of our survey, some predictions are made based on
less-accurate models. Those are noted with an asterisk (*) next to their prediction.
This is a very popular school, and you're looking at the whole list. If you
would like to only see completed applications,
click here for a smaller version of this page.
|
| 2010 | NY | 2070 | 3.78 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 96.7% |
| 2009 | MA | 2030 | 3.03 | Top 40% | Caucasian | 82.2% |
| 2009 | WI | 2010 | 3.70 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 94.7% |
| 2009 | NJ | 1820 | 3.50 | Unknown | Caucasian | 90.5% |
| 2009 | MA | 1770 | 3.35 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 88.4% |
| 2009 | NJ | 1740 | 3.75 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 92.3% |
| 2009 | PA | 1530 | 3.90 | Bottom 50% | Caucasian | 68.3% |
| 2008 | WI | 27 | 3.55 | Top 40% | None Indicated | 81.8% |
| 2008 | IL | 19 | 3.00 | Top 10% | African-American | 99.9% |
|
| 2011 | MA | 1550 | 3.00 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 76.3% |
| 2010 | (Private) | 2130 | 3.84 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 97.4% |
| 2010 | MA | 2080 | 3.70 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 96.1% |
| 2010 | VA | 2000 | 3.79 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 96.2% |
| 2010 | TN | 1990 | 4.00 | Top 2% | East Asian | 97.1% |
| 2010 | RI | 1960 | 3.40 | Class Not Ranked | None Indicated | 92.4% |
| 2010 | MD | 1950 | 3.65 | Top 15% | Native American | 100.0% |
| 2010 | NJ | 1940 | 3.80 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 95.1% |
| 2010 | NY | 1930 | 3.50 | Top 40% | Caucasian | 84.5% |
| 2010 | MA | 1920 | 3.20 | Top 30% | African-American | 100.0% |
| 2010 | MD | 1860 | 3.87 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 94.4% |
| 2010 | NY | 1830 | 3.68 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 94.7% |
| 2010 | FL | 1760 | 3.30 | Top 20% | Hispanic | 100.0% |
| 2010 | NJ | 1740 | 3.55 | Top 35% | Caucasian | 81.0% |
| 2010 | MA | 1730 | 3.60 | Top 25% | Caucasian | 85.8% |
| 2010 | PA | 1730 | 3.90 | Top 3% | Caucasian | 94.1% |
| 2010 | NJ | 1730 | 3.40 | Top 30% | Caucasian | 81.2% |
| 2010 | NY | 1670 | 3.07 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 87.0% |
| 2010 | PA | 1670 | 3.68 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 90.1% |
| 2010 | NY | 1640 | 3.70 | Top 15% | Caucasian | 88.6% |
| 2010 | RI | 1610 | 2.80 | Top 35% | East Asian | 62.1% |
| 2010 | CA | 1540 | 3.10 | Unknown | Hispanic | 100.0% |
| 2010 | NY | 1530 | 3.30 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 80.2% |
| 2010 | CA | 28 | 3.40 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 91.1% |
| 2009 | CT | 2210 | 3.63 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 97.4% |
| 2009 | GA | 2110 | 3.90 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 96.4% |
| 2009 | NY | 2080 | 3.99 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 97.4% |
| 2009 | MA | 2080 | 3.85 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 96.5% |
| 2009 | NY | 2000 | 3.86 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 96.5% |
| 2009 | TX | 2000 | 3.83 | Top 10% | East Asian | 95.8% |
| 2009 | NJ | 2000 | 3.49 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 92.5% |
| 2009 | NY | 2000 | 2.80 | Class Not Ranked | Hispanic | 100.0% |
| 2009 | NY | 2000 | 4.00 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 96.9% |
| 2009 | CA | 1960 | 3.66 | Unknown | Caucasian | 93.8% |
| 2009 | NY | 1960 | 3.20 | Top 40% | Caucasian | 81.9% |
| 2009 | NY | 1950 | 3.60 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 93.4% |
| 2009 | NY | 1930 | 3.70 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 92.9% |
| 2009 | NY | 1930 | 3.40 | Top 30% | East Asian | 87.4% |
| 2009 | CA | 1910 | 3.70 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 95.4% |
| 2009 | VA | 1910 | 2.85 | Class Not Ranked | African-American | 100.0% |
| 2009 | NY | 1880 | 3.70 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 93.9% |
| 2009 | PA | 1870 | 3.60 | Top 5% | South Asian | 94.1% |
| 2009 | NH | 1860 | 3.22 | Top 20% | African-American | 100.0% |
| 2009 | NC | 1860 | 2.76 | Unknown | Caucasian | 84.6% |
| 2009 | RI | 1850 | 3.50 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 89.6% |
| 2009 | NY | 1830 | 3.80 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 94.6% |
| 2009 | VA | 1820 | 3.20 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 88.0% |
| 2009 | NY | 1800 | 3.50 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 94.7% |
| 2009 | CA | 1780 | 3.87 | Top 10% | Hispanic | 100.0% |
| 2009 | VA | 1770 | 3.30 | Top 40% | Caucasian | 75.8% |
| 2009 | NY | 1720 | 3.00 | Class Not Ranked | Hispanic | 100.0% |
| 2009 | NJ | 1700 | 3.17 | Class Not Ranked | Hispanic | 100.0% |
| 2009 | CT | 1650 | 3.40 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 87.2% |
| 2009 | PA | 1640 | 3.89 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 91.0% |
| 2009 | NY | 1620 | 3.50 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 83.3% |
| 2009 | CT | 1590 | 3.25 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 81.5% |
| 2009 | NY | 1560 | 3.50 | Top 5% | South Asian | 87.5% |
| 2009 | XX | 1550 | 2.87 | Bottom 30% | East Asian | 38.9% |
| 2009 | NY | 32 | 4.00 | Top 1% | Caucasian | 98.0% |
| 2009 | IL | 28 | 3.60 | Top 20% | None Indicated | 91.2% |
| 2009 | IL | 25 | 2.40 | Class Not Ranked | African-American | 100.0% |
| 2009 | LA | 25 | 3.30 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 86.4% |
| 2009 | GA | 25 | 3.40 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 85.5% |
| 2008 | NJ | 2190 | 3.90 | Unknown | None Indicated | 97.0% |
| 2008 | NY | 2170 | 4.00 | Top 5% | None Indicated | 97.9% |
| 2008 | MA | 2140 | 4.00 | Valedictorian | None Indicated | 98.1% |
| 2008 | CA | 2080 | 3.90 | Top 1% | Caucasian | 97.5% |
| 2008 | MD | 2010 | 3.63 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 95.1% |
| 2008 | NY | 2000 | 3.60 | Unknown | Caucasian | 94.1% |
| 2008 | NY | 1990 | 3.70 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 93.5% |
| 2008 | NY | 1950 | 3.58 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 92.2% |
| 2008 | GA | 1910 | 3.72 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 94.4% |
| 2008 | NY | 1690 | 3.35 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 84.9% |
| 2007 | TX | 2020 | 3.70 | Top 10% | Hispanic | 100.0% |
| 2007 | VA | 1940 | 3.27 | Unknown | South Asian | 91.2% |
| 2007 | MN | 32 | 3.78 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 95.6% |
| 2006 | NJ | 2170 | 3.47 | Unknown | Caucasian | 96.4% |
|
|
| 2010 | NY | 21 | 3.20 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 76.6% |
| 2009 | CT | 1880 | 2.90 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 86.9% |
| 2008 | NJ | 1980 | 3.00 | Unknown | Caucasian | 90.0% |
| 2008 | CT | 1910 | 3.00 | Bottom 40% | Caucasian | 63.9% |
| 2008 | NY | 1880 | 3.65 | Top 20% | None Indicated | 93.5% |
| 2008 | FL | 1780 | 3.50 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 87.9% |
| 2008 | NY | 1490 | 3.75 | Top 20% | None Indicated | 82.0% |
| 2007 | LA | 26 | 2.70 | Bottom 50% | Caucasian | 58.3% |
|
| 2012 | IL | 2100 | 3.70 | Top 15% | Hispanic | 100.0% |
| 2010 | NY | 2190 | 4.00 | Top 2% | Caucasian | 98.2% |
| 2010 | WA | 1970 | 2.60 | Bottom 20% | East Asian | 43.1% |
| 2010 | MA | 1960 | 3.59 | Class Not Ranked | None Indicated | 93.4% |
| 2010 | NJ | 1930 | 3.60 | Top 25% | Caucasian | 90.6% |
| 2010 | NY | 1890 | 2.70 | Unknown | Caucasian | 84.8% |
| 2010 | MD | 1870 | 3.00 | Unknown | Caucasian | 87.3% |
| 2010 | VA | 1820 | 3.56 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 92.1% |
| 2010 | NY | 1810 | 3.47 | Bottom 50% | Caucasian | 74.3% |
| 2010 | NJ | 1790 | 3.20 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 88.2% |
| 2010 | NY | 1780 | 2.90 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 83.6% |
| 2010 | ME | 1760 | 3.25 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 86.9% |
| 2010 | NY | 1750 | 3.70 | Top 20% | Other | 89.0% |
| 2010 | XX | 1750 | 2.70 | Unknown | Middle-Eastern | 80.0% |
| 2010 | NJ | 1720 | 3.76 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 92.8% |
| 2010 | NY | 1700 | 3.30 | Bottom 50% | Caucasian | 65.8% |
| 2010 | PA | 1660 | 3.20 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 83.4% |
| 2010 | NY | 1650 | 3.50 | Bottom 50% | Caucasian | 66.9% |
| 2010 | NY | 1640 | 3.50 | Class Not Ranked | African-American | 100.0% |
| 2010 | NY | 1630 | 3.50 | Top 40% | Caucasian | 72.7% |
| 2010 | NY | 1600 | 3.59 | Top 30% | Caucasian | 79.0% |
| 2010 | NY | 1480 | 3.75 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 81.6% |
| 2010 | MT | 1460 | 3.70 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 88.8% |
| 2010 | FL | 1430 | 3.28 | Top 10% | Hispanic | 100.0% |
| 2010 | CA | 27 | 3.43 | Top 30% | Caucasian | 84.9% |
| 2009 | NJ | 1990 | 3.50 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 93.4% |
| 2009 | NY | 1970 | 2.90 | Class Not Ranked | Hispanic | 100.0% |
| 2009 | MA | 1950 | 3.13 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 88.8% |
| 2009 | CA | 1940 | 3.10 | Unknown | Caucasian | 89.9% |
| 2009 | NJ | 1890 | 3.80 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 92.5% |
| 2009 | PA | 1840 | 3.50 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 92.1% |
| 2009 | NY | 1830 | 3.33 | Top 40% | Caucasian | 81.1% |
| 2009 | NY | 1790 | 3.60 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 89.1% |
| 2009 | PA | 1720 | 3.00 | Unknown | Caucasian | 82.8% |
| 2009 | ME | 1720 | 3.67 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 88.0% |
| 2009 | NY | 1710 | 3.30 | Top 30% | Caucasian | 79.0% |
| 2009 | NJ | 1700 | 3.50 | Unknown | Caucasian | 87.7% |
| 2009 | NY | 1600 | 3.25 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 84.1% |
| 2009 | MA | 1590 | 3.40 | Top 30% | Caucasian | 76.1% |
| 2009 | NJ | 1510 | 3.30 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 79.1% |
| 2009 | NJ | 1510 | 3.53 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 82.2% |
| 2009 | (Private) | 1490 | 3.40 | Top 40% | Caucasian | 63.7% |
| 2009 | NY | 1410 | 3.10 | Top 20% | Other | 68.1% |
| 2008 | MD | 2240 | 3.67 | Top 5% | None Indicated | 97.6% |
| 2008 | NJ | 2040 | 3.65 | Top 10% | South Asian | 95.5% |
| 2008 | CA | 2020 | 3.20 | Unknown | Caucasian | 92.1% |
| 2008 | CT | 2020 | 3.25 | Top 30% | Hispanic | 100.0% |
| 2008 | NJ | 1980 | 3.02 | Unknown | Caucasian | 90.1% |
| 2008 | NY | 1860 | 3.50 | Unknown | Caucasian | 91.8% |
| 2008 | CA | 1780 | 3.50 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 87.9% |
| 2008 | PR | 1760 | 3.01 | Bottom 50% | Hispanic | 99.9% |
| 2008 | MA | 1710 | 3.45 | Top 10% | Other | 90.7% |
| 2008 | NY | 1700 | 3.40 | Unknown | Caucasian | 86.7% |
| 2008 | XX | 1620 | 3.90 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 87.6% |
| 2008 | XX | 1620 | 3.70 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 89.1% |
| 2008 | WA | 1600 | 3.10 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 79.8% |
| 2008 | NJ | 1350 | 3.47 | Top 20% | East Asian | 71.8% |
| 2007 | NJ | 1470 | 3.54 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 78.3% |
| 2006 | NY | 2210 | 3.70 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 97.5% |
|
| 2012 | IL | 2300 | 3.45 | Top 40% | East Asian | 92.7% |
| 2012 | TX | 2190 | 3.60 | Top 15% | South Asian | 96.1% |
| 2012 | NY | 2090 | 3.40 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 94.8% |
| 2012 | NJ | 2090 | 3.68 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 96.1% |
| 2012 | PA | 1870 | 4.00 | Top 1% | Caucasian | 96.4% |
| 2011 | CA | 2330 | 3.08 | Top 10% | East Asian | 96.3% |
| 2011 | MD | 2230 | 3.60 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 96.5% |
| 2011 | MA | 2110 | 3.52 | Top 25% | Caucasian | 93.3% |
| 2011 | NJ | 2110 | 3.90 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 96.9% |
| 2011 | NJ | 2100 | 3.72 | Top 3% | Other | 97.1% |
| 2011 | PA | 2100 | 3.90 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 97.3% |
| 2011 | MD | 2090 | 3.95 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 96.9% |
| 2011 | NC | 2070 | 3.50 | Top 20% | South Asian | 94.4% |
| 2011 | MD | 2010 | 3.71 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 95.5% |
| 2011 | NY | 1960 | 3.80 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 95.8% |
| 2011 | MD | 1950 | 3.00 | Unknown | African-American | 100.0% |
| 2011 | PA | 1940 | 3.80 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 93.3% |
| 2011 | CT | 1840 | 3.40 | Top 30% | Caucasian | 84.8% |
| 2011 | PA | 1830 | 3.50 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 90.6% |
| 2011 | IL | 1800 | 3.40 | Top 40% | Caucasian | 82.0% |
| 2011 | NY | 1800 | 3.50 | Top 30% | Caucasian | 84.7% |
| 2011 | MD | 1720 | 3.20 | Unknown | Caucasian | 85.1% |
| 2011 | MD | 1710 | 3.10 | Top 35% | East Asian | 72.9% |
| 2011 | CA | 1700 | 3.45 | Top 30% | Middle-Eastern | 80.7% |
| 2011 | MD | 1480 | 3.73 | Top 15% | South Asian | 83.6% |
| 2011 | PA | 30 | 3.20 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 92.0% |
| 2011 | CO | 27 | 3.30 | Top 25% | Caucasian | 85.5% |
| 2011 | NY | 25 | 3.20 | Unknown | Caucasian | 85.3% |
| 2010 | PA | 2370 | 4.00 | Valedictorian | Caucasian | 98.9% |
| 2010 | NJ | 2270 | 3.80 | Top 1% | Caucasian | 98.3% |
| 2010 | IL | 2260 | 3.83 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 98.0% |
| 2010 | NJ | 2260 | 3.64 | Unknown | Caucasian | 96.8% |
| 2010 | CA | 2210 | 3.67 | Top 2% | Caucasian | 97.7% |
| 2010 | OR | 2160 | 4.00 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 98.0% |
| 2010 | IN | 2150 | 3.20 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 94.6% |
| 2010 | XX | 2150 | 3.60 | Top 5% | East Asian | 96.9% |
| 2010 | ME | 2140 | 3.92 | Top 1% | Caucasian | 97.9% |
| 2010 | PA | 2110 | 3.58 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 96.5% |
| 2010 | NY | 2100 | 2.98 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 92.2% |
| 2010 | NY | 2100 | 3.89 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 95.6% |
| 2010 | NJ | 2090 | 2.75 | Unknown | Caucasian | 90.4% |
| 2010 | MA | 2070 | 3.60 | Top 15% | Caucasian | 94.9% |
| 2010 | NY | 2070 | 3.70 | Top 30% | Caucasian | 92.6% |
| 2010 | NJ | 2050 | 3.60 | Top 4% | Caucasian | 96.2% |
| 2010 | MA | 2040 | 3.50 | Unknown | Caucasian | 94.1% |
| 2010 | PA | 2040 | 4.00 | Top 1% | Caucasian | 97.5% |
| 2010 | NY | 2030 | 3.75 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 95.1% |
| 2010 | WI | 2020 | 3.86 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 96.5% |
| 2010 | VA | 2010 | 3.60 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 95.0% |
| 2010 | MA | 2010 | 3.46 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 93.5% |
| 2010 | MA | 1990 | 3.40 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 92.8% |
| 2010 | MA | 1980 | 3.01 | Top 40% | Caucasian | 80.1% |
| 2010 | NY | 1980 | 3.52 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 93.4% |
| 2010 | NY | 1980 | 3.80 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 94.7% |
| 2010 | LA | 1970 | 3.00 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 89.8% |
| 2010 | IL | 1960 | 3.10 | Top 40% | Caucasian | 87.8% |
| 2010 | NJ | 1960 | 3.20 | Unknown | African-American | 100.0% |
| 2010 | NH | 1960 | 3.70 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 93.0% |
| 2010 | TX | 1960 | 3.50 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 91.8% |
| 2010 | NY | 1950 | 3.80 | Top 1% | Caucasian | 96.8% |
| 2010 | PA | 1940 | 3.66 | Top 2% | Hispanic | 100.0% |
| 2010 | NY | 1940 | 3.64 | Unknown | East Asian | 93.4% |
| 2010 | VA | 1930 | 3.00 | Unknown | Caucasian | 91.8% |
| 2010 | NJ | 1920 | 3.72 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 94.5% |
| 2010 | NY | 1910 | 3.00 | Bottom 50% | Caucasian | 71.0% |
| 2010 | VA | 1910 | 3.87 | Unknown | Caucasian | 94.2% |
| 2010 | NY | 1870 | 4.00 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 95.8% |
| 2010 | NJ | 1850 | 2.80 | Unknown | Caucasian | 87.6% |
| 2010 | CT | 1850 | 3.20 | Unknown | Caucasian | 88.7% |
| 2010 | NY | 1840 | 2.80 | Class Not Ranked | Hispanic | 100.0% |
| 2010 | NJ | 1820 | 0.00 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 28.1% |
| 2010 | MD | 1810 | 3.89 | Class Not Ranked | Hispanic | 100.0% |
| 2010 | RI | 1800 | 3.00 | Top 30% | Caucasian | 78.2% |
| 2010 | CA | 1800 | 3.24 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 87.8% |
| 2010 | XX | 1790 | 3.20 | Class Not Ranked | Other | 87.2% |
| 2010 | NY | 1780 | 3.54 | Class Not Ranked | Hispanic | 100.0% |
| 2010 | CT | 1770 | 3.26 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 87.2% |
| 2010 | MA | 1770 | 2.90 | Unknown | African-American | 100.0% |
| 2010 | CA | 1770 | 3.10 | Top 30% | Caucasian | 78.5% |
| 2010 | PA | 1760 | 3.20 | Top 25% | Hispanic | 100.0% |
| 2010 | NJ | 1760 | 3.70 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 89.2% |
| 2010 | NY | 1750 | 3.68 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 92.8% |
| 2010 | NY | 1750 | 3.73 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 93.3% |
| 2010 | NJ | 1740 | 2.60 | Unknown | Caucasian | 78.2% |
| 2010 | ME | 1730 | 3.90 | Top 3% | Caucasian | 94.1% |
| 2010 | NY | 1720 | 3.30 | Top 15% | Hispanic | 100.0% |
| 2010 | VA | 1710 | 3.30 | Class Not Ranked | East Asian | 85.9% |
| 2010 | CT | 1710 | 3.08 | Bottom 50% | Caucasian | 61.9% |
| 2010 | VA | 1700 | 3.57 | Bottom 50% | Caucasian | 76.8% |
| 2010 | MA | 1700 | 3.47 | Top 15% | Caucasian | 87.4% |
| 2010 | MA | 1680 | 3.00 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 81.5% |
| 2010 | FL | 1670 | 3.90 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 94.1% |
| 2010 | MA | 1670 | 3.75 | Top 3% | Caucasian | 92.4% |
| 2010 | NJ | 1660 | 2.60 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 77.6% |
| 2010 | NJ | 1660 | 2.50 | Bottom 50% | Caucasian | 50.5% |
| 2010 | AZ | 1660 | 3.40 | Top 40% | Caucasian | 72.4% |
| 2010 | NY | 1650 | 2.10 | Unknown | African-American | 99.9% |
| 2010 | NY | 1640 | 3.10 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 81.4% |
| 2010 | NY | 1640 | 4.00 | Salutatorian | African-American | 100.0% |
| 2010 | MA | 1640 | 2.85 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 77.8% |
| 2010 | NJ | 1630 | 3.50 | Bottom 50% | Caucasian | 65.8% |
| 2010 | NJ | 1620 | 3.40 | Unknown | Caucasian | 84.3% |
| 2010 | PA | 1620 | 3.25 | Top 40% | Caucasian | 67.7% |
| 2010 | PA | 1600 | 3.40 | Top 15% | Caucasian | 83.6% |
| 2010 | NJ | 1600 | 3.40 | Top 10% | Hispanic | 100.0% |
| 2010 | NJ | 1600 | 2.95 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 80.3% |
| 2010 | VA | 1600 | 2.84 | Unknown | Caucasian | 75.9% |
| 2010 | FL | 1590 | 3.00 | Unknown | Hispanic | 100.0% |
| 2010 | (Private) | 1570 | 3.25 | Top 30% | Caucasian | 72.0% |
| 2010 | NJ | 1570 | 3.52 | Top 30% | Caucasian | 76.5% |
| 2010 | NY | 1550 | 3.64 | Top 35% | Caucasian | 74.6% |
| 2010 | NH | 1550 | 3.50 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 83.3% |
| 2010 | TX | 1540 | 3.76 | Top 15% | Hispanic | 100.0% |
| 2010 | TX | 1540 | 3.24 | Top 25% | Hispanic | 100.0% |
| 2010 | NJ | 1530 | 3.40 | Unknown | Hispanic | 100.0% |
| 2010 | CT | 1500 | 2.58 | Unknown | Caucasian | 66.5% |
| 2010 | NY | 1500 | 4.00 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 85.2% |
| 2010 | XX | 1430 | 3.65 | Class Not Ranked | Middle-Eastern | 81.0% |
| 2010 | ME | 1370 | 2.89 | Top 15% | Caucasian | 65.6% |
| 2010 | NY | 1350 | 3.20 | Unknown | East Asian | 70.4% |
| 2010 | WV | 1260 | 3.29 | Unknown | Caucasian | 90.3% |
| 2010 | RI | 1250 | 2.90 | Bottom 50% | Caucasian | 31.7% |
| 2010 | NY | 1250 | 3.00 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 61.2% |
| 2010 | CT | 1230 | 2.80 | Unknown | Other | 55.8% |
| 2010 | WI | 31 | 3.61 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 95.0% |
| 2010 | CA | 31 | 3.80 | Top 5% | Hispanic | 100.0% |
| 2010 | NJ | 30 | 3.71 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 94.7% |
| 2010 | CA | 30 | 3.80 | Top 5% | Other | 96.4% |
| 2010 | NY | 28 | 3.32 | Top 25% | Caucasian | 87.4% |
| 2010 | LA | 28 | 3.60 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 92.4% |
| 2010 | MN | 28 | 3.39 | Top 40% | Caucasian | 81.9% |
| 2010 | NY | 26 | 3.54 | Top 30% | Caucasian | 84.7% |
| 2010 | NY | 26 | 2.60 | Class Not Ranked | South Asian | 80.0% |
| 2010 | CA | 25 | 3.80 | Unknown | Caucasian | 90.7% |
| 2010 | NJ | 25 | 3.40 | Unknown | South Asian | 87.4% |
| 2010 | (Private) | 24 | 3.30 | Top 40% | Caucasian | 70.9% |
| 2010 | WA | 24 | 3.10 | Bottom 50% | Caucasian | 59.8% |
| 2010 | FL | 22 | 3.70 | Top 25% | Hispanic | 100.0% |
| 2010 | OR | 21 | 3.60 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 84.5% |
| 2009 | TX | 2260 | 3.85 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 96.9% |
| 2009 | NJ | 2200 | 4.00 | Class Not Ranked | South Asian | 97.3% |
| 2009 | NJ | 2140 | 3.20 | Unknown | Caucasian | 94.0% |
| 2009 | TX | 2100 | 3.30 | Top 10% | East Asian | 94.8% |
| 2009 | NJ | 2100 | 3.73 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 96.9% |
| 2009 | NJ | 2060 | 3.00 | Class Not Ranked | Other | 91.6% |
| 2009 | MI | 2050 | 3.89 | Bottom 50% | Caucasian | 88.0% |
| 2009 | (Private) | 2050 | 3.43 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 93.9% |
| 2009 | NY | 2030 | 3.00 | Top 40% | Caucasian | 81.9% |
| 2009 | NJ | 1970 | 3.00 | Class Not Ranked | Other | 96.1% |
| 2009 | NY | 1970 | 3.50 | Unknown | Caucasian | 93.1% |
| 2009 | NJ | 1970 | 3.00 | Class Not Ranked | Other | 89.8% |
| 2009 | NJ | 1970 | 3.00 | Class Not Ranked | Other | 89.8% |
| 2009 | NJ | 1970 | 3.05 | Class Not Ranked | Other | 90.2% |
| 2009 | NJ | 1970 | 3.00 | Class Not Ranked | Other | 89.8% |
| 2009 | MA | 1970 | 3.67 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 93.0% |
| 2009 | NJ | 1960 | 3.00 | Class Not Ranked | Other | 89.5% |
| 2009 | MA | 1930 | 3.82 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 95.7% |
| 2009 | (Private) | 1920 | 3.90 | Salutatorian | Other | 96.7% |
| 2009 | PA | 1910 | 3.82 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 92.9% |
| 2009 | MA | 1910 | 3.62 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 91.7% |
| 2009 | NJ | 1900 | 2.40 | Class Not Ranked | Native American | 100.0% |
| 2009 | NY | 1890 | 3.90 | Salutatorian | Caucasian | 96.7% |
| 2009 | PA | 1890 | 3.84 | Unknown | Caucasian | 93.7% |
| 2009 | FL | 1880 | 3.75 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 95.6% |
| 2009 | NJ | 1860 | 3.60 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 93.2% |
| 2009 | MA | 1860 | 3.10 | Top 30% | East Asian | 82.9% |
| 2009 | MA | 1850 | 3.50 | Top 30% | Caucasian | 86.2% |
| 2009 | MA | 1850 | 3.00 | Top 40% | Caucasian | 74.6% |
| 2009 | OH | 1840 | 3.70 | Unknown | Caucasian | 92.2% |
| 2009 | NY | 1840 | 3.80 | Top 10% | East Asian | 93.8% |
| 2009 | XX | 1840 | 3.70 | Top 5% | African-American | 100.0% |
| 2009 | NY | 1830 | 4.00 | Valedictorian | None Indicated | 97.0% |
| 2009 | MD | 1830 | 3.50 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 89.2% |
| 2009 | MA | 1810 | 3.08 | Top 30% | Caucasian | 79.7% |
| 2009 | CT | 1810 | 3.46 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 89.9% |
| 2009 | NY | 1810 | 3.68 | Top 30% | Caucasian | 86.9% |
| 2009 | PA | 1810 | 3.60 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 92.2% |
| 2009 | WA | 1810 | 4.00 | Top 1% | Caucasian | 95.7% |
| 2009 | CT | 1800 | 3.20 | Top 40% | Caucasian | 75.6% |
| 2009 | NJ | 1780 | 3.60 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 90.3% |
| 2009 | MA | 1780 | 2.94 | Bottom 50% | East Asian | 62.9% |
| 2009 | CA | 1760 | 3.05 | Unknown | East Asian | 86.8% |
| 2009 | NJ | 1760 | 2.40 | Class Not Ranked | Middle-Eastern | 76.0% |
| 2009 | (Private) | 1750 | 3.60 | Top 30% | Caucasian | 84.3% |
| 2009 | ME | 1750 | 3.50 | Top 30% | Caucasian | 83.1% |
| 2009 | ME | 1750 | 3.60 | Top 30% | Caucasian | 84.3% |
| 2009 | NY | 1740 | 3.20 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 85.8% |
| 2009 | PA | 1740 | 3.42 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 86.1% |
| 2009 | MA | 1700 | 2.90 | Top 30% | Caucasian | 72.3% |
| 2009 | MI | 1690 | 3.34 | Top 30% | Hispanic | 100.0% |
| 2009 | DC | 1670 | 3.00 | Top 40% | Hispanic | 99.9% |
| 2009 | CT | 1660 | 3.80 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 92.0% |
| 2009 | NY | 1650 | 3.50 | Top 30% | Caucasian | 79.5% |
| 2009 | MD | 1600 | 3.00 | Top 40% | Caucasian | 61.7% |
| 2009 | MA | 1590 | 3.36 | Top 30% | Caucasian | 75.5% |
| 2009 | NY | 1560 | 3.50 | Unknown | Caucasian | 83.6% |
| 2009 | NJ | 1550 | 3.73 | Top 20% | South Asian | 83.8% |
| 2009 | NJ | 1540 | 3.30 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 80.3% |
| 2009 | NY | 1530 | 3.70 | Top 40% | Other | 71.4% |
| 2009 | NJ | 1520 | 2.70 | Class Not Ranked | Middle-Eastern | 69.9% |
| 2009 | NY | 1480 | 3.10 | Bottom 50% | Other | 48.8% |
| 2009 | NY | 1250 | 3.00 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 61.2% |
| 2009 | TX | 1090 | 4.00 | Top 10% | Hispanic | 100.0% |
| 2009 | MA | 1070 | 3.60 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 89.5% |
| 2009 | (Private) | 32 | 3.30 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 94.3% |
| 2009 | IL | 31 | 3.80 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 95.0% |
| 2009 | FL | 31 | 3.50 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 94.5% |
| 2009 | IN | 30 | 3.30 | Class Not Ranked | Hispanic | 100.0% |
| 2009 | MA | 30 | 3.20 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 92.0% |
| 2009 | PA | 30 | 3.00 | Class Not Ranked | African-American | 100.0% |
| 2009 | MN | 30 | 3.90 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 96.1% |
| 2009 | NY | 28 | 3.50 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 90.5% |
| 2009 | MN | 28 | 3.39 | Top 30% | Caucasian | 86.2% |
| 2009 | NY | 26 | 3.65 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 89.4% |
| 2009 | IL | 26 | 3.27 | Bottom 50% | South Asian | 69.6% |
| 2008 | CT | 2220 | 3.68 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 97.5% |
| 2008 | NY | 2150 | 3.70 | Unknown | Caucasian | 96.1% |
| 2008 | MD | 2120 | 2.90 | Unknown | Caucasian | 92.0% |
| 2008 | VA | 2060 | 3.66 | Unknown | Caucasian | 95.1% |
| 2008 | CA | 2010 | 3.30 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 91.4% |
| 2008 | RI | 2010 | 2.96 | Unknown | Caucasian | 90.3% |
| 2008 | MD | 2000 | 3.54 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 94.7% |
| 2008 | IL | 1990 | 3.40 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 93.9% |
| 2008 | NY | 1990 | 4.00 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 94.9% |
| 2008 | PA | 1930 | 3.40 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 90.5% |
| 2008 | NY | 1920 | 3.85 | Unknown | Caucasian | 95.9% |
| 2008 | MD | 1890 | 3.20 | Top 30% | None Indicated | 84.1% |
| 2008 | NY | 1880 | 3.40 | Unknown | Caucasian | 90.9% |
| 2008 | NY | 1880 | 3.40 | Bottom 50% | Caucasian | 76.3% |
| 2008 | NY | 1870 | 3.10 | Top 30% | Caucasian | 90.9% |
| 2008 | CA | 1870 | 3.50 | Unknown | Hispanic | 100.0% |
| 2008 | NJ | 1810 | 3.50 | Top 30% | Caucasian | 85.0% |
| 2008 | CA | 1800 | 3.70 | Unknown | East Asian | 91.5% |
| 2008 | NJ | 1800 | 3.70 | Unknown | Caucasian | 91.5% |
| 2008 | NJ | 1780 | 3.00 | Unknown | Caucasian | 84.8% |
| 2008 | NJ | 1780 | 3.00 | Bottom 50% | Caucasian | 64.1% |
| 2008 | NY | 1760 | 3.40 | Unknown | South Asian | 88.3% |
| 2008 | PA | 1760 | 2.50 | Unknown | Caucasian | 77.6% |
| 2008 | NY | 1750 | 3.40 | Unknown | South Asian | 88.0% |
| 2008 | VT | 1710 | 3.30 | Unknown | Caucasian | 85.9% |
| 2008 | MA | 1700 | 3.10 | Class Not Ranked | Hispanic | 100.0% |
| 2008 | NJ | 1690 | 3.00 | Bottom 20% | Caucasian | 35.3% |
| 2008 | PA | 1680 | 3.17 | Unknown | Caucasian | 83.6% |
| 2008 | NJ | 1650 | 3.40 | Bottom 50% | Caucasian | 65.0% |
| 2008 | MD | 1630 | 3.10 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 78.3% |
| 2008 | NY | 1630 | 4.00 | Unknown | Caucasian | 90.2% |
| 2008 | MA | 1590 | 3.45 | Unknown | None Indicated | 83.9% |
| 2008 | NJ | 1560 | 3.50 | Unknown | Caucasian | 83.6% |
| 2008 | NJ | 1500 | 4.00 | Top 30% | Hispanic | 100.0% |
| 2008 | NY | 1410 | 2.90 | Unknown | Caucasian | 67.9% |
| 2008 | NY | 30 | 4.00 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 96.9% |
| 2008 | AL | 30 | 3.60 | Bottom 50% | Caucasian | 83.9% |
| 2008 | MA | 28 | 3.65 | Top 10% | None Indicated | 93.7% |
| 2007 | NY | 1900 | 3.60 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 94.5% |
| 2007 | NJ | 1780 | 3.20 | Top 20% | South Asian | 84.9% |
| 2007 | PA | 1640 | 3.10 | Unknown | None Indicated | 81.4% |
| 2007 | MI | 24 | 3.40 | Top 30% | East Asian | 78.6% |
| 2007 | NY | 24 | 3.90 | Unknown | Caucasian | 90.2% |
| 2007 | NM | 20 | 3.10 | Top 40% | Hispanic | 99.9% |
| |