Ithaca College Applications and Decisions
Below is a list of applicants who have demonstrated interest in Ithaca College. Our best formula
for this college is based on
72 members who were accepted or rejected. The formula
has a college admissions prediction accuracy of
89%?.
Because not all members have filled out the most recent version of our survey, some predictions are made based on
less-accurate models. Those are noted with an asterisk (*) next to their prediction.
This is a very popular school, so we're only showing you profiles that have received an admissions decision. If you
want to see all applicants to this school,
click here (caution: the page will take awhile to load).
|
| 2010 | NY | 2070 | 3.78 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 96.7% |
| 2009 | MA | 2030 | 3.03 | Top 40% | Caucasian | 82.2% |
| 2009 | WI | 2010 | 3.70 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 94.7% |
| 2009 | NJ | 1820 | 3.50 | Unknown | Caucasian | 90.5% |
| 2009 | MA | 1770 | 3.35 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 88.4% |
| 2009 | NJ | 1740 | 3.75 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 92.3% |
| 2009 | PA | 1530 | 3.90 | Bottom 50% | Caucasian | 68.3% |
| 2008 | WI | 27 | 3.55 | Top 40% | None Indicated | 81.8% |
| 2008 | IL | 19 | 3.00 | Top 10% | African-American | 99.9% |
|
| 2011 | MA | 1550 | 3.00 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 76.3% |
| 2010 | (Private) | 2130 | 3.84 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 97.4% |
| 2010 | MA | 2080 | 3.70 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 96.1% |
| 2010 | VA | 2000 | 3.79 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 96.2% |
| 2010 | TN | 1990 | 4.00 | Top 2% | East Asian | 97.1% |
| 2010 | RI | 1960 | 3.40 | Class Not Ranked | None Indicated | 92.4% |
| 2010 | MD | 1950 | 3.65 | Top 15% | Native American | 100.0% |
| 2010 | NJ | 1940 | 3.80 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 95.1% |
| 2010 | NY | 1930 | 3.50 | Top 40% | Caucasian | 84.5% |
| 2010 | MA | 1920 | 3.20 | Top 30% | African-American | 100.0% |
| 2010 | MD | 1860 | 3.87 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 94.4% |
| 2010 | NY | 1830 | 3.68 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 94.7% |
| 2010 | FL | 1760 | 3.30 | Top 20% | Hispanic | 100.0% |
| 2010 | NJ | 1740 | 3.55 | Top 35% | Caucasian | 81.0% |
| 2010 | MA | 1730 | 3.60 | Top 25% | Caucasian | 85.8% |
| 2010 | PA | 1730 | 3.90 | Top 3% | Caucasian | 94.1% |
| 2010 | NJ | 1730 | 3.40 | Top 30% | Caucasian | 81.2% |
| 2010 | NY | 1670 | 3.07 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 87.0% |
| 2010 | PA | 1670 | 3.68 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 90.1% |
| 2010 | NY | 1640 | 3.70 | Top 15% | Caucasian | 88.6% |
| 2010 | RI | 1610 | 2.80 | Top 35% | East Asian | 62.1% |
| 2010 | NY | 1530 | 3.30 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 80.2% |
| 2010 | CA | 28 | 3.40 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 91.1% |
| 2009 | CT | 2210 | 3.63 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 97.4% |
| 2009 | GA | 2110 | 3.90 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 96.4% |
| 2009 | NY | 2080 | 3.99 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 97.4% |
| 2009 | MA | 2080 | 3.85 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 96.5% |
| 2009 | NY | 2000 | 3.86 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 96.5% |
| 2009 | TX | 2000 | 3.83 | Top 10% | East Asian | 95.8% |
| 2009 | NJ | 2000 | 3.49 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 92.5% |
| 2009 | NY | 2000 | 2.80 | Class Not Ranked | Hispanic | 100.0% |
| 2009 | NY | 2000 | 4.00 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 96.9% |
| 2009 | CA | 1960 | 3.66 | Unknown | Caucasian | 93.8% |
| 2009 | NY | 1960 | 3.20 | Top 40% | Caucasian | 81.9% |
| 2009 | NY | 1950 | 3.60 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 93.4% |
| 2009 | NY | 1930 | 3.70 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 92.9% |
| 2009 | NY | 1930 | 3.40 | Top 30% | East Asian | 87.4% |
| 2009 | CA | 1910 | 3.70 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 95.4% |
| 2009 | VA | 1910 | 2.85 | Class Not Ranked | African-American | 100.0% |
| 2009 | NY | 1880 | 3.70 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 93.9% |
| 2009 | PA | 1870 | 3.60 | Top 5% | South Asian | 94.1% |
| 2009 | NH | 1860 | 3.22 | Top 20% | African-American | 100.0% |
| 2009 | NC | 1860 | 2.76 | Unknown | Caucasian | 84.6% |
| 2009 | RI | 1850 | 3.50 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 89.6% |
| 2009 | NY | 1830 | 3.80 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 94.6% |
| 2009 | VA | 1820 | 3.20 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 88.0% |
| 2009 | NY | 1800 | 3.50 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 94.7% |
| 2009 | CA | 1780 | 3.87 | Top 10% | Hispanic | 100.0% |
| 2009 | VA | 1770 | 3.30 | Top 40% | Caucasian | 75.8% |
| 2009 | NY | 1720 | 3.00 | Class Not Ranked | Hispanic | 100.0% |
| 2009 | NJ | 1700 | 3.17 | Class Not Ranked | Hispanic | 100.0% |
| 2009 | CT | 1650 | 3.40 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 87.2% |
| 2009 | PA | 1640 | 3.89 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 91.0% |
| 2009 | NY | 1620 | 3.50 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 83.3% |
| 2009 | CT | 1590 | 3.25 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 81.5% |
| 2009 | NY | 1560 | 3.50 | Top 5% | South Asian | 87.5% |
| 2009 | XX | 1550 | 2.87 | Bottom 30% | East Asian | 38.9% |
| 2009 | NY | 32 | 4.00 | Top 1% | Caucasian | 98.0% |
| 2009 | IL | 28 | 3.60 | Top 20% | None Indicated | 91.2% |
| 2009 | IL | 25 | 2.40 | Class Not Ranked | African-American | 100.0% |
| 2009 | LA | 25 | 3.30 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 86.4% |
| 2009 | GA | 25 | 3.40 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 85.5% |
| 2008 | NJ | 2190 | 3.90 | Unknown | None Indicated | 97.0% |
| 2008 | NY | 2170 | 4.00 | Top 5% | None Indicated | 97.9% |
| 2008 | MA | 2140 | 4.00 | Valedictorian | None Indicated | 98.1% |
| 2008 | CA | 2080 | 3.90 | Top 1% | Caucasian | 97.5% |
| 2008 | MD | 2010 | 3.63 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 95.1% |
| 2008 | NY | 2000 | 3.60 | Unknown | Caucasian | 94.1% |
| 2008 | NY | 1990 | 3.70 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 93.5% |
| 2008 | NY | 1950 | 3.58 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 92.2% |
| 2008 | GA | 1910 | 3.72 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 94.4% |
| 2008 | NY | 1690 | 3.35 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 84.9% |
| 2007 | TX | 2020 | 3.70 | Top 10% | Hispanic | 100.0% |
| 2007 | VA | 1940 | 3.27 | Unknown | South Asian | 91.2% |
| 2007 | MN | 32 | 3.78 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 95.6% |
| 2006 | NJ | 2170 | 3.47 | Unknown | Caucasian | 96.4% |
|
|
| 2010 | NY | 21 | 3.20 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 76.6% |
| 2009 | CT | 1880 | 2.90 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 86.9% |
| 2008 | NJ | 1980 | 3.00 | Unknown | Caucasian | 90.0% |
| 2008 | CT | 1910 | 3.00 | Bottom 40% | Caucasian | 63.9% |
| 2008 | NY | 1880 | 3.65 | Top 20% | None Indicated | 93.5% |
| 2008 | FL | 1780 | 3.50 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 87.9% |
| 2008 | NY | 1490 | 3.75 | Top 20% | None Indicated | 82.0% |
| 2007 | LA | 26 | 2.70 | Bottom 50% | Caucasian | 58.3% |
| |