Duke University Applications and Decisions
Below is a list of applicants who have demonstrated interest in Duke University. Our best formula
for this college is based on
360 members who were accepted or rejected. The formula
has a college admissions prediction accuracy of
77%?.
Because not all members have filled out the most recent version of our survey, some predictions are made based on
less-accurate models. Those are noted with an asterisk (*) next to their prediction.
This is a very popular school, so we're only showing you profiles that have received an admissions decision. If you
want to see all applicants to this school,
click here (caution: the page will take awhile to load).
|
| 2010 | VA | 2290 | 4.00 | Top 5% | South Asian | 87.1% |
| 2010 | AZ | 2250 | 4.00 | Salutatorian | Caucasian | 94.0% |
| 2010 | MA | 2240 | 4.00 | Top 3% | Caucasian | 74.3% |
| 2010 | XX | 2210 | 3.84 | Top 5% | East Asian | 58.3% |
| 2010 | TN | 2200 | 4.00 | Top 3% | African-American | 94.6% |
| 2010 | NY | 2180 | 3.80 | Class Not Ranked | Hispanic | 93.9% |
| 2010 | CA | 2160 | 3.98 | Top 1% | Caucasian | 59.9% |
| 2010 | TN | 34 | 3.28 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 31.2% |
| 2009 | AL | 2380 | 3.75 | Class Not Ranked | East Asian | 77.5% |
| 2009 | MI | 2280 | 3.95 | Top 1% | Caucasian | 53.3% |
| 2009 | CT | 2240 | 3.87 | Salutatorian | Caucasian | 41.3% |
| 2009 | TN | 2220 | 3.97 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 75.6% |
| 2009 | NC | 2170 | 4.00 | Valedictorian | East Asian | 82.0% |
| 2009 | (Private) | 2150 | 3.90 | Unknown | None Indicated | 35.6% |
| 2009 | CA | 2140 | 3.80 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 33.4% |
| 2009 | CT | 2110 | 3.95 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 13.4% |
| 2009 | OH | 2070 | 3.75 | Class Not Ranked | African-American | 54.8% |
| 2009 | OH | 2060 | 3.92 | Salutatorian | Caucasian | 66.6% |
| 2009 | TX | 1990 | 3.70 | Top 20% | African-American | 17.1% |
| 2009 | VA | 1990 | 4.00 | Valedictorian | Caucasian | 46.7% |
| 2009 | IL | 1940 | 3.90 | Top 10% | Hispanic | 80.9% |
| 2009 | NC | 1880 | 3.20 | Top 20% | African-American | 5.5% |
| 2009 | CA | 34 | 4.00 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 75.6% |
| 2009 | NC | 34 | 3.96 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 60.0% |
| 2009 | OH | 18 | 2.90 | Top 30% | Caucasian | 99.8% |
| 2008 | NY | 2320 | 3.44 | Class Not Ranked | None Indicated | 24.4% |
| 2008 | OH | 2290 | 4.00 | Valedictorian | South Asian | 66.2% |
| 2008 | AL | 2180 | 4.00 | Valedictorian | South Asian | 40.8% |
| 2008 | XX | 2150 | 3.80 | Valedictorian | Middle-Eastern | 43.2% |
| 2008 | RI | 2090 | 3.80 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 25.7%* |
| 2008 | (Private) | 2070 | 3.95 | Top 1% | African-American | 70.7% |
| 2008 | AR | 2000 | 3.83 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 35.8% |
| 2008 | SC | 1380 | 4.00 | Unknown | South Asian | 13.2%* |
| 2008 | MO | 34 | 4.00 | Top 1% | Caucasian | 60.1% |
| 2008 | MD | 33 | 3.76 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 8.5% |
| 2007 | (Private) | 2400 | 3.70 | Unknown | Caucasian | 53.2%* |
| 2007 | NY | 2350 | 3.70 | Unknown | None Indicated | 29.8% |
| 2007 | NY | 2270 | 3.75 | Unknown | Caucasian | 30.9%* |
| 2007 | NY | 2270 | 3.85 | Unknown | Caucasian | 35.8%* |
| 2007 | MD | 2250 | 4.00 | Unknown | Caucasian | 39.6%* |
| 2007 | TX | 2180 | 4.00 | Top 5% | Other | 33.5%* |
| 2006 | NC | 2240 | 3.96 | Top 1% | East Asian | 93.3%* |
| 2006 | PA | 2210 | 3.96 | Top 5% | South Asian | 37.0%* |
|
| 2010 | NJ | 2390 | 4.00 | Valedictorian | East Asian | 88.4% |
| 2010 | PA | 2380 | 4.00 | Valedictorian | East Asian | 87.1% |
| 2010 | NC | 2330 | 3.99 | Valedictorian | Caucasian | 76.7% |
| 2010 | (Private) | 2300 | 4.00 | Salutatorian | Caucasian | 88.7% |
| 2010 | FL | 2290 | 4.00 | Valedictorian | East Asian | 79.3% |
| 2010 | NC | 2290 | 4.00 | Valedictorian | Caucasian | 74.0% |
| 2010 | NJ | 2240 | 3.70 | Class Not Ranked | Hispanic | 95.0% |
| 2010 | TX | 2220 | 4.00 | Top 1% | Hispanic | 87.4% |
| 2010 | ME | 2130 | 3.70 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 55.0% |
| 2010 | FL | 2110 | 3.94 | Top 1% | Caucasian | 87.4% |
| 2010 | NJ | 2030 | 3.40 | Top 10% | African-American | 54.8% |
| 2010 | FL | 1890 | 4.00 | Top 10% | Hispanic | 75.0% |
| 2010 | TX | 1870 | 3.96 | Valedictorian | African-American | 49.1% |
| 2009 | CA | 2400 | 4.00 | Salutatorian | Caucasian | 84.3% |
| 2009 | CA | 2390 | 3.93 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 69.7% |
| 2009 | NJ | 2380 | 3.90 | Class Not Ranked | East Asian | 60.8% |
| 2009 | IA | 2350 | 4.00 | Top 1% | East Asian | 78.1% |
| 2009 | TX | 2350 | 4.00 | Top 1% | East Asian | 72.6% |
| 2009 | FL | 2350 | 4.00 | Valedictorian | Caucasian | 87.2% |
| 2009 | TX | 2340 | 3.96 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 63.7% |
| 2009 | NY | 2330 | 4.00 | Top 1% | East Asian | 67.7% |
| 2009 | NY | 2330 | 3.70 | Unknown | Caucasian | 28.8% |
| 2009 | RI | 2330 | 3.95 | Top 5% | East Asian | 61.2% |
| 2009 | AZ | 2320 | 4.00 | Valedictorian | Caucasian | 95.8% |
| 2009 | KS | 2310 | 4.00 | Top 1% | South Asian | 80.6% |
| 2009 | FL | 2310 | 4.00 | Salutatorian | Caucasian | 74.9% |
| 2009 | NY | 2310 | 3.99 | Valedictorian | East Asian | 78.6% |
| 2009 | NJ | 2310 | 3.90 | Top 5% | Hispanic | 92.7% |
| 2009 | NC | 2310 | 4.00 | Top 5% | East Asian | 48.6% |
| 2009 | NY | 2300 | 3.95 | Top 1% | Caucasian | 68.6% |
| 2009 | PA | 2300 | 3.70 | Unknown | Caucasian | 85.5% |
| 2009 | NC | 2300 | 3.95 | Top 1% | Caucasian | 48.8% |
| 2009 | NJ | 2300 | 3.85 | Salutatorian | South Asian | 59.7% |
| 2009 | MN | 2290 | 4.00 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 42.6% |
| 2009 | CA | 2290 | 3.98 | Valedictorian | East Asian | 77.1% |
| 2009 | ME | 2270 | 4.00 | Top 5% | None Indicated | 83.4% |
| 2009 | NE | 2260 | 3.97 | Top 1% | None Indicated | 72.2% |
| 2009 | CA | 2260 | 3.86 | Top 10% | East Asian | 47.6% |
| 2009 | FL | 2250 | 3.92 | Salutatorian | South Asian | 45.7% |
| 2009 | IL | 2240 | 4.00 | Valedictorian | East Asian | 87.2% |
| 2009 | OR | 2240 | 4.00 | Salutatorian | Caucasian | 54.0% |
| 2009 | NY | 2240 | 3.50 | Class Not Ranked | East Asian | 23.6% |
| 2009 | NC | 2240 | 3.78 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 31.6% |
| 2009 | CA | 2240 | 3.74 | Top 10% | African-American | 78.8% |
| 2009 | CA | 2240 | 4.00 | Valedictorian | Other | 55.5% |
| 2009 | OH | 2220 | 3.85 | Top 5% | Hispanic | 86.8% |
| 2009 | AZ | 2210 | 4.00 | Valedictorian | Caucasian | 73.8% |
| 2009 | (Private) | 2170 | 3.99 | Valedictorian | Caucasian | 83.0% |
| 2009 | FL | 2160 | 4.00 | Valedictorian | Hispanic | 94.0% |
| 2009 | NY | 2160 | 4.00 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 29.8%* |
| 2009 | WI | 2130 | 4.00 | Top 1% | East Asian | 54.7% |
| 2009 | TX | 2120 | 4.00 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 80.3% |
| 2009 | (Private) | 2110 | 3.80 | Class Not Ranked | African-American | 47.0% |
| 2009 | (Private) | 2070 | 4.00 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 13.9% |
| 2009 | PA | 2050 | 4.00 | Salutatorian | Other | 53.7% |
| 2009 | OH | 2040 | 3.92 | Salutatorian | Caucasian | 49.3% |
| 2009 | MI | 2040 | 3.98 | Top 1% | African-American | 100.0% |
| 2009 | NC | 2020 | 4.00 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 15.5% |
| 2009 | NJ | 1920 | 4.00 | Top 5% | Hispanic | 53.3% |
| 2009 | CA | 1910 | 4.00 | Top 1% | Hispanic | 53.5% |
| 2009 | IL | 1870 | 3.91 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 3.8%* |
| 2009 | NH | 1860 | 3.22 | Top 20% | African-American | 100.0% |
| 2009 | IL | 1710 | 3.98 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 4.2% |
| 2009 | IL | 36 | 4.00 | Valedictorian | Caucasian | 89.3% |
| 2009 | FL | 35 | 3.98 | Salutatorian | Caucasian | 69.7% |
| 2009 | CO | 34 | 3.95 | Salutatorian | Caucasian | 47.1% |
| 2009 | CA | 30 | 3.90 | Class Not Ranked | Hispanic | 40.7% |
| 2009 | MD | 30 | 3.90 | Top 20% | Hispanic | 35.7% |
| 2009 | GA | 28 | 3.96 | Top 10% | African-American | 41.3% |
| 2008 | NJ | 2400 | 4.00 | Valedictorian | Caucasian | 85.2% |
| 2008 | WV | 2390 | 4.00 | Valedictorian | East Asian | 92.0% |
| 2008 | GA | 2380 | 4.00 | Salutatorian | South Asian | 84.3% |
| 2008 | MA | 2370 | 3.97 | Valedictorian | South Asian | 71.6%* |
| 2008 | FL | 2370 | 4.00 | Valedictorian | None Indicated | 83.0% |
| 2008 | IN | 2350 | 3.95 | Top 1% | East Asian | 70.5% |
| 2008 | CA | 2350 | 3.96 | Class Not Ranked | East Asian | 48.9% |
| 2008 | MA | 2340 | 3.85 | Top 5% | South Asian | 40.0% |
| 2008 | MD | 2340 | 4.00 | Top 5% | East Asian | 52.2% |
| 2008 | TX | 2330 | 4.00 | Valedictorian | Caucasian | 80.8% |
| 2008 | VA | 2330 | 3.96 | Top 5% | East Asian | 70.6% |
| 2008 | OR | 2310 | 4.00 | Valedictorian | Caucasian | 77.6% |
| 2008 | MA | 2310 | 4.00 | Valedictorian | Caucasian | 62.3%* |
| 2008 | TN | 2300 | 4.00 | Valedictorian | South Asian | 67.8%* |
| 2008 | CA | 2300 | 3.93 | Salutatorian | East Asian | 62.6% |
| 2008 | VA | 2300 | 3.93 | Valedictorian | Caucasian | 56.8%* |
| 2008 | NY | 2280 | 4.00 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 40.8% |
| 2008 | LA | 2270 | 3.90 | Salutatorian | East Asian | 49.7% |
| 2008 | CA | 2270 | 4.00 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 44.0% |
| 2008 | TX | 2240 | 4.00 | Valedictorian | Caucasian | 64.5% |
| 2008 | NV | 2230 | 4.00 | Valedictorian | South Asian | 85.3% |
| 2008 | CA | 2220 | 3.95 | Top 1% | Middle-Eastern | 35.9% |
| 2008 | FL | 2160 | 4.00 | Top 1% | East Asian | 43.5% |
| 2008 | TN | 2140 | 4.00 | Salutatorian | African-American | 93.8% |
| 2008 | IL | 1990 | 3.95 | Top 1% | African-American | 58.7%* |
| 2008 | FL | 35 | 3.97 | Salutatorian | Caucasian | 63.8% |
| 2008 | FL | 35 | 3.98 | Top 1% | South Asian | 68.5% |
| 2008 | MN | 32 | 3.92 | Top 10% | Hispanic | 76.2%* |
| 2008 | (Private) | 31 | 3.93 | Top 1% | South Asian | 17.1% |
| 2007 | MD | 2340 | 3.86 | Class Not Ranked | East Asian | 47.0% |
| 2007 | CA | 2300 | 4.00 | Top 5% | East Asian | 57.1%* |
| 2007 | VA | 2290 | 3.99 | Top 1% | Middle-Eastern | 57.0%* |
| 2007 | XX | 2270 | 3.98 | Unknown | East Asian | 42.7%* |
| 2007 | AZ | 2260 | 3.98 | Valedictorian | East Asian | 51.2%* |
| 2007 | FL | 2250 | 4.00 | Valedictorian | Caucasian | 67.8%* |
| 2007 | FL | 2230 | 3.99 | Valedictorian | Hispanic | 93.7%* |
| 2007 | CA | 2220 | 4.00 | Valedictorian | Caucasian | 53.5%* |
| 2007 | NC | 2200 | 3.78 | Top 20% | None Indicated | 79.3%* |
| 2007 | IA | 36 | 4.00 | Valedictorian | Caucasian | 77.4%* |
| 2007 | NC | 35 | 3.97 | Valedictorian | Other | 97.0%* |
| 2007 | OH | 34 | 3.33 | Unknown | South Asian | 14.3%* |
| 2006 | WA | 2300 | 3.97 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 55.4%* |
| 2006 | FL | 2250 | 3.83 | Top 10% | East Asian | 55.1% |
| 2004 | FL | 2390 | 3.91 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 58.4% |
| 2003 | CA | 2360 | 4.00 | Class Not Ranked | East Asian | 61.7%* |
| 2003 | CA | 2320 | 4.00 | Top 5% | East Asian | 60.6%* |
| 2002 | VA | 1420 | 4.00 | Salutatorian | Caucasian | 53.5%* |
| 2001 | TX | 2320 | 3.88 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 54.0% |
| 2001 | TN | 1310 | 3.60 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 3.0%* |
| 2000 | NY | 2360 | 4.00 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 100.0% |
|
|
| 2010 | PA | 2200 | 3.71 | Top 10% | South Asian | 32.8% |
| 2010 | OH | 2200 | 3.70 | Class Not Ranked | Other | 35.6% |
| 2010 | NJ | 2180 | 3.95 | Top 5% | None Indicated | 29.0% |
| 2010 | FL | 2000 | 4.00 | Salutatorian | None Indicated | 24.2% |
| 2010 | CT | 1950 | 3.63 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 33.3% |
| 2010 | VA | 1670 | 3.70 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 1.0% |
| 2010 | NC | 1650 | 3.08 | Bottom 50% | African-American | 0.3% |
| 2010 | FL | 1650 | 3.78 | Top 2% | Caucasian | 0.4% |
| 2010 | NC | 1600 | 3.75 | Top 10% | African-American | 14.3% |
| 2010 | IL | 32 | 3.85 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 47.4% |
| 2010 | MD | 31 | 3.47 | Top 10% | South Asian | 3.5% |
| 2010 | MN | 29 | 3.70 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 2.4% |
| 2010 | TN | 28 | 3.80 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 9.8% |
| 2009 | MA | 2350 | 3.95 | Class Not Ranked | East Asian | 56.0% |
| 2009 | PA | 2350 | 3.80 | Top 10% | Other | 52.0% |
| 2009 | TX | 2320 | 3.92 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 58.2% |
| 2009 | VA | 2320 | 3.83 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 78.7% |
| 2009 | TN | 2320 | 4.00 | Valedictorian | East Asian | 75.1% |
| 2009 | CA | 2320 | 3.60 | Top 10% | East Asian | 31.1% |
| 2009 | MI | 2300 | 4.00 | Valedictorian | East Asian | 76.0% |
| 2009 | (Private) | 2290 | 4.00 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 48.1% |
| 2009 | NY | 2290 | 3.76 | Class Not Ranked | East Asian | 30.6% |
| 2009 | CA | 2290 | 3.93 | Top 5% | East Asian | 26.2% |
| 2009 | TX | 2280 | 4.00 | Top 1% | South Asian | 61.8% |
| 2009 | NJ | 2280 | 3.81 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 36.0% |
| 2009 | NY | 2280 | 4.00 | Salutatorian | East Asian | 66.7% |
| 2009 | TN | 2270 | 3.97 | Top 5% | East Asian | 64.1% |
| 2009 | (Private) | 2270 | 4.00 | Valedictorian | Other | 70.4% |
| 2009 | FL | 2270 | 3.76 | Top 1% | East Asian | 45.8% |
| 2009 | WA | 2250 | 3.70 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 18.7% |
| 2009 | (Private) | 2250 | 3.83 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 30.6% |
| 2009 | CA | 2240 | 3.97 | Top 1% | East Asian | 41.5% |
| 2009 | GA | 2240 | 3.72 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 18.3% |
| 2009 | (Private) | 2240 | 3.90 | Salutatorian | Caucasian | 44.4% |
| 2009 | (Private) | 2240 | 3.75 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 21.7% |
| 2009 | CA | 2230 | 3.65 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 28.2% |
| 2009 | CA | 2230 | 3.90 | Top 5% | East Asian | 60.3% |
| 2009 | FL | 2230 | 3.75 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 19.7% |
| 2009 | FL | 2230 | 3.90 | Top 1% | East Asian | 47.3% |
| 2009 | CA | 2220 | 3.76 | Unknown | Caucasian | 15.5% |
| 2009 | NY | 2220 | 3.70 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 13.9% |
| 2009 | MD | 2220 | 3.75 | Top 5% | None Indicated | 23.3% |
| 2009 | VA | 2220 | 4.00 | Top 1% | South Asian | 42.2% |
| 2009 | IL | 2210 | 4.00 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 54.0% |
| 2009 | (Private) | 2210 | 3.60 | Unknown | Caucasian | 16.1% |
| 2009 | MD | 2210 | 4.00 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 40.5% |
| 2009 | PA | 2200 | 3.85 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 31.2% |
| 2009 | FL | 2190 | 4.00 | Salutatorian | Caucasian | 28.4% |
| 2009 | NJ | 2190 | 3.87 | Top 10% | None Indicated | 21.7% |
| 2009 | CA | 2190 | 3.76 | Class Not Ranked | East Asian | 10.8% |
| 2009 | SC | 2190 | 3.86 | Top 5% | South Asian | 47.4% |
| 2009 | PA | 2180 | 4.00 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 34.7% |
| 2009 | CO | 2180 | 3.84 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 20.6% |
| 2009 | NJ | 2180 | 4.00 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 29.8% |
| 2009 | CA | 2170 | 3.49 | Top 35% | None Indicated | 2.3% |
| 2009 | MS | 2170 | 3.90 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 17.5% |
| 2009 | VA | 2170 | 3.92 | Top 5% | Hispanic | 88.6% |
| 2009 | XX | 2170 | 3.97 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 28.0% |
| 2009 | OH | 2160 | 3.99 | Top 1% | None Indicated | 35.4% |
| 2009 | CA | 2160 | 3.91 | Top 1% | South Asian | 44.4% |
| 2009 | TN | 2160 | 4.00 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 13.4% |
| 2009 | NY | 2150 | 3.70 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 44.1% |
| 2009 | CA | 2150 | 3.83 | Top 10% | East Asian | 15.2% |
| 2009 | CA | 2150 | 3.80 | Top 1% | Caucasian | 21.4% |
| 2009 | MA | 2140 | 3.85 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 17.3% |
| 2009 | VA | 2140 | 4.00 | Valedictorian | East Asian | 35.5% |
| 2009 | TX | 2130 | 3.90 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 27.3% |
| 2009 | TX | 2130 | 3.73 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 8.9% |
| 2009 | PA | 2130 | 3.70 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 5.9% |
| 2009 | TX | 2130 | 4.00 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 21.4% |
| 2009 | MD | 2130 | 3.96 | Top 5% | East Asian | 14.6% |
| 2009 | PA | 2130 | 3.40 | Top 20% | African-American | 35.9% |
| 2009 | OH | 2120 | 4.00 | Top 1% | Caucasian | 52.8% |
| 2009 | OH | 2120 | 4.00 | Valedictorian | Caucasian | 52.8% |
| 2009 | MI | 2120 | 3.98 | Valedictorian | Caucasian | 33.4% |
| 2009 | FL | 2120 | 3.80 | Top 1% | East Asian | 6.4% |
| 2009 | CA | 2120 | 3.86 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 16.5% |
| 2009 | TX | 2110 | 3.73 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 33.9% |
| 2009 | XX | 2100 | 3.75 | Top 1% | South Asian | 12.7% |
| 2009 | PA | 2100 | 3.75 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 8.8% |
| 2009 | GA | 2100 | 3.95 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 21.8% |
| 2009 | PA | 2080 | 3.67 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 21.0% |
| 2009 | MD | 2080 | 3.87 | Top 20% | South Asian | 7.7% |
| 2009 | MO | 2070 | 3.89 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 26.6% |
| 2009 | FL | 2070 | 4.00 | Top 1% | Caucasian | 16.2% |
| 2009 | CA | 2060 | 3.89 | Salutatorian | Caucasian | 10.3% |
| 2009 | XX | 2060 | 3.97 | Top 1% | East Asian | 15.3% |
| 2009 | NV | 2050 | 3.87 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 19.3% |
| 2009 | NJ | 2050 | 3.90 | Salutatorian | Caucasian | 8.5% |
| 2009 | CT | 2050 | 3.90 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 6.9% |
| 2009 | VA | 2050 | 3.78 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 13.5% |
| 2009 | FL | 2030 | 3.50 | Top 10% | South Asian | 2.5% |
| 2009 | IN | 2020 | 3.80 | Top 10% | South Asian | 4.4% |
| 2009 | PA | 2000 | 3.76 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 11.3% |
| 2009 | TX | 1990 | 3.80 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 15.0% |
| 2009 | SC | 1990 | 3.57 | Top 10% | African-American | 92.0% |
| 2009 | CA | 1990 | 4.00 | Top 10% | Other | 7.5% |
| 2009 | WA | 1990 | 4.00 | Valedictorian | Hispanic | 65.3% |
| 2009 | FL | 1960 | 4.00 | Valedictorian | East Asian | 11.0% |
| 2009 | NY | 1960 | 3.70 | Top 10% | African-American | 28.3% |
| 2009 | TX | 1960 | 3.90 | Top 10% | African-American | 41.4% |
| 2009 | XX | 1960 | 4.00 | Top 10% | East Asian | 3.7% |
| 2009 | NJ | 1950 | 3.75 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 2.2% |
| 2009 | CA | 1930 | 3.53 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 5.7% |
| 2009 | FL | 1910 | 3.86 | Top 5% | Hispanic | 37.9% |
| 2009 | OH | 1900 | 4.00 | Valedictorian | Caucasian | 28.0% |
| 2009 | XX | 1900 | 3.94 | Top 5% | Other | 10.2% |
| 2009 | MD | 1890 | 3.69 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 14.0% |
| 2009 | VA | 1880 | 4.00 | Salutatorian | Hispanic | 39.1% |
| 2009 | FL | 1870 | 4.00 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 5.1% |
| 2009 | VA | 1860 | 3.90 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 2.0% |
| 2009 | NC | 1840 | 3.90 | Salutatorian | East Asian | 4.1% |
| 2009 | CT | 1840 | 3.29 | Unknown | African-American | 8.8% |
| 2009 | NY | 1810 | 3.00 | Unknown | Hispanic | 4.3% |
| 2009 | FL | 1790 | 3.58 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 0.6% |
| 2009 | XX | 1750 | 3.81 | Class Not Ranked | East Asian | 0.5% |
| 2009 | NY | 1700 | 3.85 | Class Not Ranked | Hispanic | 22.0% |
| 2009 | SC | 1640 | 3.77 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 1.1% |
| 2009 | MS | 1580 | 3.89 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 6.1% |
| 2009 | VA | 30 | 4.00 | Top 5% | East Asian | 9.4% |
| 2009 | TX | 35 | 3.55 | Top 30% | Caucasian | 23.1% |
| 2009 | MO | 35 | 3.89 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 54.6% |
| 2009 | IL | 34 | 3.65 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 23.1% |
| 2009 | FL | 34 | 3.75 | Top 10% | None Indicated | 30.2% |
| 2009 | MO | 34 | 4.00 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 39.2% |
| 2009 | TN | 33 | 3.75 | Top 15% | East Asian | 10.6% |
| 2009 | CA | 33 | 3.83 | Top 5% | East Asian | 25.6% |
| 2009 | IL | 33 | 3.85 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 37.1% |
| 2009 | (Private) | 33 | 3.72 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 3.9% |
| 2009 | IL | 32 | 3.75 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 19.2% |
| 2009 | WI | 32 | 3.63 | Top 10% | Middle-Eastern | 7.7% |
| 2009 | MI | 32 | 3.95 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 19.6% |
| 2009 | CT | 32 | 3.72 | Top 10% | East Asian | 7.6% |
| 2009 | PA | 32 | 3.67 | Class Not Ranked | South Asian | 9.6% |
| 2009 | IL | 31 | 3.68 | Unknown | Caucasian | 14.5% |
| 2009 | CA | 30 | 4.00 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 10.3% |
| 2009 | CT | 30 | 3.90 | Top 1% | Caucasian | 23.4% |
| 2009 | KS | 29 | 3.78 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 3.2% |
| 2009 | DC | 29 | 3.70 | Top 10% | None Indicated | 2.4% |
| 2009 | TN | 29 | 3.80 | Unknown | African-American | 37.4% |
| 2009 | MN | 28 | 3.85 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 2.0% |
| 2009 | TN | 21 | 2.25 | Bottom 50% | African-American | 0.0% |
| 2008 | XX | 2360 | 4.00 | Valedictorian | East Asian | 79.2% |
| 2008 | CA | 2340 | 3.90 | Top 1% | East Asian | 64.5% |
| 2008 | CT | 2340 | 4.00 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 65.8% |
| 2008 | TX | 2340 | 3.93 | Top 1% | Caucasian | 50.8% |
| 2008 | MD | 2340 | 3.63 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 12.1% |
| 2008 | XX | 2320 | 3.90 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 56.5% |
| 2008 | MD | 2320 | 3.88 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 44.8% |
| 2008 | KY | 2290 | 3.62 | Unknown | Caucasian | 27.9%* |
| 2008 | CA | 2270 | 3.65 | Class Not Ranked | East Asian | 27.1% |
| 2008 | CA | 2250 | 3.70 | Top 5% | East Asian | 49.7% |
| 2008 | PA | 2250 | 3.85 | Top 10% | South Asian | 28.6% |
| 2008 | NY | 2240 | 3.92 | Top 1% | Caucasian | 42.6% |
| 2008 | NJ | 2230 | 3.92 | Salutatorian | South Asian | 40.8% |
| 2008 | TX | 2230 | 3.70 | Unknown | East Asian | 18.2% |
| 2008 | WA | 2230 | 3.99 | Top 1% | East Asian | 34.1% |
| 2008 | XX | 2220 | 3.50 | Top 5% | Other | 18.5%* |
| 2008 | IL | 2200 | 3.95 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 31.0% |
| 2008 | DC | 2200 | 3.58 | Unknown | Caucasian | 8.3% |
| 2008 | MN | 2200 | 3.82 | Unknown | Caucasian | 22.5%* |
| 2008 | TX | 2190 | 3.90 | Top 10% | None Indicated | 20.3% |
| 2008 | CO | 2180 | 3.80 | Top 10% | East Asian | 18.2% |
| 2008 | CA | 2170 | 4.00 | Valedictorian | East Asian | 44.5% |
| 2008 | XX | 2170 | 3.76 | Class Not Ranked | East Asian | 11.1% |
| 2008 | FL | 2150 | 4.00 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 15.3% |
| 2008 | FL | 2140 | 3.93 | Top 1% | None Indicated | 27.5% |
| 2008 | FL | 2130 | 3.80 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 13.5% |
| 2008 | CA | 2120 | 3.92 | Top 5% | East Asian | 12.7% |
| 2008 | XX | 2120 | 4.00 | Valedictorian | East Asian | 49.1% |
| 2008 | NH | 2120 | 3.82 | Top 10% | East Asian | 15.2%* |
| 2008 | CA | 2100 | 3.80 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 10.8% |
| 2008 | NY | 2090 | 4.00 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 15.6% |
| 2008 | OH | 2090 | 3.20 | Top 40% | African-American | 11.7% |
| 2008 | FL | 2050 | 3.92 | Top 1% | Hispanic | 64.9% |
| 2008 | XX | 2050 | 4.00 | Top 10% | South Asian | 15.8% |
| 2008 | (Private) | 2030 | 3.75 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 6.0% |
| 2008 | IL | 2010 | 3.90 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 9.4% |
| 2008 | VA | 2010 | 4.00 | Top 1% | Caucasian | 7.3% |
| 2008 | WI | 1980 | 3.75 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 6.0% |
| 2008 | XX | 1970 | 3.85 | Salutatorian | East Asian | 10.7% |
| 2008 | FL | 1940 | 4.00 | Valedictorian | Caucasian | 14.2% |
| 2008 | TX | 1940 | 3.72 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 5.3% |
| 2008 | PA | 1930 | 3.80 | Unknown | Caucasian | 3.0%* |
| 2008 | (Private) | 1900 | 3.70 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 9.4% |
| 2008 | XX | 1900 | 3.90 | Top 5% | East Asian | 3.7% |
| 2008 | CA | 1870 | 3.70 | Unknown | Hispanic | 14.5% |
| 2008 | IL | 1870 | 4.00 | Salutatorian | Caucasian | 4.4%* |
| 2008 | VA | 1860 | 4.00 | Top 1% | Caucasian | 3.3% |
| 2008 | (Private) | 1720 | 3.63 | Top 10% | South Asian | 0.8%* |
| 2008 | MI | 1650 | 3.74 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 1.7% |
| 2008 | NY | 1530 | 3.64 | Unknown | None Indicated | 29.8%* |
| 2008 | CA | 33 | 3.51 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 11.2% |
| 2008 | OH | 33 | 4.00 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 31.8% |
| 2008 | NY | 33 | 4.00 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 17.0% |
| 2008 | MI | 31 | 3.80 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 10.2%* |
| 2008 | IL | 31 | 4.00 | Top 1% | Caucasian | 18.7%* |
| 2008 | CA | 30 | 3.90 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 5.0% |
| 2008 | OH | 29 | 3.90 | Top 1% | Caucasian | 4.7% |
| 2007 | AL | 2290 | 4.00 | Top 1% | Caucasian | 67.2%* |
| 2007 | CA | 2270 | 3.90 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 45.5%* |
| 2007 | NJ | 2270 | 3.86 | Top 5% | East Asian | 43.3%* |
| 2007 | NY | 2240 | 3.95 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 42.2%* |
| 2007 | NJ | 2220 | 4.00 | Top 1% | South Asian | 43.7%* |
| 2007 | NJ | 2220 | 3.88 | Top 10% | South Asian | 31.3%* |
| 2007 | (Private) | 2180 | 4.00 | Valedictorian | East Asian | 36.8%* |
| 2007 | NJ | 2180 | 3.90 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 25.8%* |
| 2007 | CA | 2160 | 3.80 | Unknown | East Asian | 16.9%* |
| 2007 | FL | 2100 | 4.00 | Unknown | Hispanic | 72.1%* |
| 2007 | CO | 2060 | 3.40 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 3.1%* |
| 2007 | FL | 1940 | 3.30 | Top 20% | Hispanic | 11.5%* |
| 2007 | TX | 1870 | 3.65 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 9.0%* |
| 2007 | GA | 1810 | 3.60 | Unknown | Caucasian | 0.8%* |
| 2007 | VA | 1730 | 3.58 | Top 10% | Other | 0.4%* |
| 2007 | MO | 29 | 3.80 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 4.7%* |
| 2007 | FL | 28 | 3.70 | Top 20% | Hispanic | 17.3%* |
| 2006 | CA | 2250 | 3.90 | Top 5% | None Indicated | 41.3%* |
| 2006 | MA | 2180 | 3.94 | Class Not Ranked | East Asian | 14.1% |
| 2006 | NY | 2180 | 3.87 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 24.5%* |
| 2003 | CA | 2040 | 3.78 | Top 5% | None Indicated | 9.0%* |
| |