Hofstra University Applications and Decisions
Below is a list of applicants who have demonstrated interest in Hofstra University. Our best formula
for this college is based on
59 members who were accepted or rejected. The formula
has a college admissions prediction accuracy of
100%?.
Because not all members have filled out the most recent version of our survey, some predictions are made based on
less-accurate models. Those are noted with an asterisk (*) next to their prediction.
This is a very popular school, and you're looking at the whole list. If you
would like to only see completed applications,
click here for a smaller version of this page.
|
| 2009 | MA | 1940 | 3.27 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 97.5% |
| 2009 | NY | 1500 | 3.50 | Bottom 40% | South Asian | 97.5% |
| 2008 | TX | 1940 | 3.80 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 98.7% |
| 2008 | MA | 1720 | 3.20 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 96.1% |
|
| 2010 | XX | 2180 | 3.62 | Top 5% | None Indicated | 98.9% |
| 2010 | (Private) | 2050 | 3.90 | Top 1% | Caucasian | 98.9% |
| 2010 | NH | 2010 | 3.53 | Top 25% | East Asian | 98.6% |
| 2010 | NY | 2010 | 3.94 | Salutatorian | Caucasian | 98.9% |
| 2010 | MA | 1990 | 3.70 | Unknown | Caucasian | 98.7% |
| 2010 | MA | 1980 | 3.01 | Top 40% | Caucasian | 97.7% |
| 2010 | TX | 1940 | 3.95 | Top 2% | Hispanic | 99.0% |
| 2010 | NJ | 1940 | 3.80 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 98.6% |
| 2010 | NY | 1930 | 3.44 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 98.0% |
| 2010 | VA | 1930 | 3.28 | Unknown | African-American | 97.5% |
| 2010 | NY | 1900 | 4.00 | Top 3% | Caucasian | 98.7% |
| 2010 | NY | 1890 | 3.69 | Top 10% | Hispanic | 98.3% |
| 2010 | (Private) | 1870 | 3.60 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 98.0% |
| 2010 | NY | 1860 | 3.18 | Top 40% | Caucasian | 97.6% |
| 2010 | MD | 1860 | 3.33 | Top 10% | African-American | 97.1% |
| 2010 | NJ | 1860 | 3.60 | Top 25% | Caucasian | 98.3% |
| 2010 | GA | 1790 | 3.30 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 97.0% |
| 2010 | CA | 1790 | 3.50 | Unknown | Caucasian | 97.5% |
| 2010 | NJ | 1790 | 3.52 | Class Not Ranked | South Asian | 97.5% |
| 2010 | MA | 1790 | 3.77 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 98.3% |
| 2010 | ME | 1760 | 3.25 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 96.4% |
| 2010 | PA | 1730 | 3.90 | Top 3% | Caucasian | 98.0% |
| 2010 | NJ | 1730 | 3.40 | Top 30% | Caucasian | 97.4% |
| 2010 | CT | 1710 | 3.08 | Bottom 50% | Caucasian | 96.9% |
| 2010 | CA | 1700 | 3.20 | Top 25% | South Asian | 97.6% |
| 2010 | CT | 1700 | 3.60 | Top 30% | Caucasian | 97.8% |
| 2010 | NJ | 1660 | 2.60 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 91.5% |
| 2010 | NJ | 1660 | 3.50 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 97.0% |
| 2010 | NY | 1630 | 3.70 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 98.1% |
| 2010 | OH | 1630 | 3.65 | Top 10% | African-American | 96.9% |
| 2010 | NJ | 1630 | 3.50 | Bottom 50% | Caucasian | 97.8% |
| 2010 | CA | 1480 | 2.90 | Unknown | Middle-Eastern | 90.6% |
| 2010 | NH | 35 | 3.96 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 99.6% |
| 2010 | MD | 26 | 2.95 | Bottom 40% | Caucasian | 97.2% |
| 2010 | CA | 23 | 3.13 | Unknown | Caucasian | 94.3% |
| 2009 | CA | 2370 | 4.00 | Top 1% | Caucasian | 99.5% |
| 2009 | IL | 2200 | 3.97 | Top 1% | Caucasian | 99.4% |
| 2009 | NY | 2090 | 3.80 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 98.9% |
| 2009 | PA | 2030 | 4.00 | Salutatorian | Hispanic | 99.0% |
| 2009 | NY | 2020 | 3.00 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 97.0% |
| 2009 | VA | 2000 | 3.00 | Unknown | East Asian | 96.9% |
| 2009 | MA | 1970 | 3.40 | Top 30% | Caucasian | 98.4% |
| 2009 | RI | 1940 | 2.80 | Unknown | Hispanic | 95.5% |
| 2009 | CA | 1930 | 3.53 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 99.0% |
| 2009 | NY | 1930 | 3.40 | Top 30% | East Asian | 98.2% |
| 2009 | XX | 1900 | 3.94 | Top 5% | Other | 98.7% |
| 2009 | RI | 1880 | 3.50 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 98.3% |
| 2009 | CT | 1880 | 2.90 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 95.6% |
| 2009 | CT | 1880 | 2.50 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 92.8% |
| 2009 | CA | 1850 | 3.20 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 97.0% |
| 2009 | HI | 1840 | 2.97 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 95.6% |
| 2009 | NH | 1830 | 3.00 | Top 10% | East Asian | 95.4% |
| 2009 | CT | 1830 | 3.69 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 98.3% |
| 2009 | MA | 1810 | 2.80 | Top 40% | Caucasian | 95.8% |
| 2009 | NJ | 1800 | 3.50 | Unknown | Caucasian | 97.5% |
| 2009 | FL | 1790 | 3.40 | Bottom 50% | South Asian | 98.2% |
| 2009 | NJ | 1780 | 3.60 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 97.9% |
| 2009 | NY | 1770 | 2.90 | Unknown | Caucasian | 94.5% |
| 2009 | XX | 1750 | 3.81 | Class Not Ranked | East Asian | 98.1% |
| 2009 | MD | 1740 | 2.70 | Class Not Ranked | East Asian | 93.8% |
| 2009 | RI | 1740 | 3.40 | Top 30% | Caucasian | 97.4% |
| 2009 | NY | 1720 | 3.00 | Class Not Ranked | Hispanic | 95.3% |
| 2009 | NJ | 1700 | 2.86 | Unknown | Other | 93.5% |
| 2009 | MD | 1680 | 3.43 | Top 40% | Caucasian | 97.5% |
| 2009 | CT | 1670 | 2.80 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 92.6% |
| 2009 | PA | 1640 | 3.89 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 97.8% |
| 2009 | NY | 1560 | 3.50 | Top 5% | South Asian | 95.5% |
| 2009 | PA | 1560 | 3.30 | Top 40% | Caucasian | 96.4% |
| 2009 | NY | 1450 | 3.63 | Top 20% | Hispanic | 96.1% |
| 2009 | CT | 1420 | 2.77 | Top 30% | Caucasian | 89.8% |
| 2009 | NJ | 27 | 3.30 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 97.0% |
| 2009 | NY | 26 | 3.76 | Top 1% | South Asian | 97.8% |
| 2008 | (Private) | 2310 | 4.00 | Top 1% | Caucasian | 99.4% |
| 2008 | NH | 2130 | 3.20 | Top 40% | Hispanic | 98.6% |
| 2008 | NH | 2070 | 3.80 | Unknown | None Indicated | 99.0% |
| 2008 | NY | 2040 | 3.80 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 99.1% |
| 2008 | PA | 2020 | 3.70 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 99.2% |
| 2008 | NY | 2020 | 3.70 | Top 10% | Hispanic | 98.7% |
| 2008 | NY | 2000 | 3.65 | Top 20% | None Indicated | 98.7% |
| 2008 | NY | 1910 | 3.80 | Top 20% | East Asian | 98.7% |
| 2008 | CT | 1910 | 3.00 | Bottom 40% | Caucasian | 97.9% |
| 2008 | MD | 1900 | 3.10 | Unknown | Caucasian | 96.6% |
| 2008 | NY | 1830 | 3.20 | Top 20% | South Asian | 96.8% |
| 2008 | (Private) | 1750 | 2.80 | Unknown | None Indicated | 93.6% |
| 2008 | MA | 1620 | 2.89 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 93.2% |
| 2008 | NY | 1550 | 3.50 | Top 30% | Caucasian | 97.9% |
| 2008 | NY | 1490 | 3.75 | Top 20% | None Indicated | 96.9% |
| 2008 | LA | 29 | 3.67 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 98.6% |
|
| 2009 | NY | 2160 | 4.00 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 99.3% |
| 2009 | (Private) | 1450 | 3.30 | Top 30% | Caucasian | 94.9% |
|
| 2012 | NY | 1700 | 3.20 | Top 30% | Middle-Eastern | 96.4% |
| 2010 | XX | 2150 | 3.70 | Top 10% | South Asian | 99.0% |
| 2010 | MD | 2090 | 3.76 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 98.9% |
| 2010 | NY | 2000 | 3.70 | Unknown | Caucasian | 98.7% |
| 2010 | RI | 2000 | 3.74 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 98.7% |
| 2010 | NY | 1990 | 3.79 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 98.7% |
| 2010 | CT | 1970 | 2.50 | Class Not Ranked | African-American | 93.9% |
| 2010 | TX | 1930 | 2.94 | Bottom 50% | South Asian | 97.6% |
| 2010 | NY | 1920 | 3.72 | Unknown | None Indicated | 98.5% |
| 2010 | CA | 1880 | 3.50 | Top 30% | Hispanic | 98.7% |
| 2010 | MA | 1870 | 3.70 | Top 3% | Caucasian | 98.0% |
| 2010 | MA | 1760 | 2.60 | Unknown | Caucasian | 92.0% |
| 2010 | CT | 1740 | 2.95 | Unknown | Caucasian | 94.5% |
| 2010 | NY | 1720 | 3.30 | Top 15% | Hispanic | 96.3% |
| 2010 | NY | 1680 | 3.72 | Top 25% | Caucasian | 98.1% |
| 2010 | NJ | 1620 | 2.75 | Bottom 40% | Caucasian | 95.1% |
| 2010 | XX | 1600 | 2.90 | Top 40% | Caucasian | 94.5% |
| 2010 | NY | 1530 | 2.80 | Top 20% | Hispanic | 90.9% |
| 2010 | MA | 1400 | 3.00 | Top 25% | Caucasian | 91.5% |
| 2010 | WA | 28 | 3.89 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 98.8% |
| 2010 | PA | 23 | 3.20 | Class Not Ranked | African-American | 94.8% |
| 2010 | CA | 23 | 2.80 | Unknown | Caucasian | 91.6% |
| 2009 | PA | 2110 | 3.85 | Top 10% | South Asian | 99.1% |
| 2009 | NY | 2000 | 4.00 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 99.3% |
| 2009 | NY | 1900 | 3.94 | Top 5% | South Asian | 98.7% |
| 2009 | PA | 1880 | 3.50 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 97.7% |
| 2009 | NY | 1860 | 2.30 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 90.6% |
| 2009 | PA | 1850 | 3.29 | Top 30% | Caucasian | 97.6% |
| 2009 | NY | 1790 | 3.60 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 97.9% |
| 2009 | MA | 1690 | 2.90 | Bottom 40% | None Indicated | 96.4% |
| 2009 | NJ | 1600 | 3.49 | Top 30% | Caucasian | 97.0% |
| 2009 | NJ | 1590 | 3.10 | Bottom 50% | Caucasian | 96.1% |
| 2009 | PA | 1550 | 3.76 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 97.3% |
| 2009 | NJ | 1450 | 3.30 | Top 40% | Middle-Eastern | 96.7% |
| 2009 | NE | 1300 | 2.80 | Top 40% | Caucasian | 89.2% |
| 2009 | XX | 26 | 3.95 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 98.5% |
| 2009 | OH | 24 | 3.70 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 97.6% |
| 2009 | NJ | 21 | 2.90 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 90.7% |
| 2008 | GA | 2090 | 3.40 | Bottom 40% | Caucasian | 99.1% |
| 2008 | PA | 1980 | 4.00 | Salutatorian | Caucasian | 98.9% |
| 2008 | PA | 1920 | 3.80 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 98.5% |
| 2008 | NJ | 1860 | 3.63 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 98.2% |
| 2008 | MA | 1760 | 3.70 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 97.8% |
| 2008 | MA | 1710 | 3.45 | Top 10% | Other | 97.1% |
| 2008 | NJ | 1580 | 2.56 | Unknown | None Indicated | 88.4% |
| 2008 | PA | 1510 | 3.70 | Bottom 50% | Other | 97.8% |
| 2008 | MA | 1280 | 3.08 | Top 30% | Caucasian | 90.9% |
| 2008 | NY | 21 | 3.10 | Bottom 50% | African-American | 95.3% |
| 2007 | MA | 2080 | 2.70 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 96.1% |
|
| 2012 | CA | 1750 | 3.60 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 97.6% |
| 2012 | CO | 25 | 2.80 | Bottom 40% | Caucasian | 96.2% |
| 2011 | MA | 2140 | 3.57 | Unknown | Caucasian | 98.8% |
| 2011 | NY | 2070 | 3.90 | Top 4% | Caucasian | 99.0% |
| 2011 | MD | 2010 | 3.71 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 98.7% |
| 2011 | OH | 1960 | 3.47 | Top 30% | Caucasian | 98.5% |
| 2011 | RI | 1960 | 3.10 | Unknown | Caucasian | 97.0% |
| 2011 | CO | 1950 | 3.64 | Unknown | Hispanic | 98.5% |
| 2011 | NY | 1910 | 3.76 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 98.8% |
| 2011 | MA | 1870 | 3.50 | Top 25% | Caucasian | 98.1% |
| 2011 | NJ | 1870 | 3.65 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 98.1% |
| 2011 | CA | 1840 | 3.20 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 96.9% |
| 2011 | MD | 1800 | 3.00 | Unknown | African-American | 96.9% |
| 2011 | NC | 1800 | 3.70 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 97.9% |
| 2011 | NY | 1760 | 3.67 | Top 15% | Caucasian | 97.8% |
| 2011 | NJ | 1760 | 3.90 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 98.4% |
| 2011 | MA | 1740 | 3.20 | Top 30% | Caucasian | 96.7% |
| 2011 | CA | 1680 | 3.20 | Unknown | Other | 95.5% |
| 2011 | PA | 1670 | 3.80 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 97.7% |
| 2011 | AZ | 1660 | 4.00 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 98.0% |
| 2011 | NY | 1630 | 3.30 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 95.6% |
| 2011 | NJ | 1600 | 2.95 | Bottom 40% | Caucasian | 96.0% |
| 2011 | NJ | 1500 | 3.90 | Top 15% | Caucasian | 97.3% |
| 2011 | CT | 1150 | 2.40 | Unknown | Caucasian | 72.4% |
| 2011 | NY | 28 | 3.20 | Unknown | Caucasian | 97.0% |
| 2011 | CA | 23 | 2.86 | Unknown | Other | 92.2% |
| 2010 | XX | 2220 | 3.80 | Top 40% | Caucasian | 99.5% |
| 2010 | NY | 2200 | 3.00 | Unknown | Caucasian | 97.9% |
| 2010 | NY | 2160 | 1.90 | Bottom 40% | Caucasian | 95.0% |
| 2010 | NY | 2050 | 3.84 | Top 1% | Caucasian | 98.8% |
| 2010 | NJ | 2040 | 3.70 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 98.8% |
| 2010 | ME | 2030 | 3.60 | Unknown | Caucasian | 98.6% |
| 2010 | NJ | 2030 | 3.49 | Top 10% | South Asian | 98.3% |
| 2010 | NH | 2010 | 2.96 | Top 40% | Caucasian | 97.7% |
| 2010 | NY | 1980 | 3.80 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 98.8% |
| 2010 | PA | 1960 | 3.75 | Top 15% | Caucasian | 98.7% |
| 2010 | NY | 1950 | 3.00 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 96.6% |
| 2010 | VA | 1940 | 3.50 | Top 25% | Caucasian | 98.7% |
| 2010 | NJ | 1940 | 2.30 | Class Not Ranked | South Asian | 91.9% |
| 2010 | PA | 1930 | 3.20 | Unknown | Hispanic | 97.2% |
| 2010 | CT | 1930 | 3.50 | Top 25% | Caucasian | 98.3% |
| 2010 | NY | 1910 | 3.40 | Top 10% | Hispanic | 97.6% |
| 2010 | NY | 1890 | 3.90 | Top 15% | Caucasian | 98.7% |
| 2010 | (Private) | 1870 | 3.80 | Top 10% | East Asian | 98.4% |
| 2010 | MA | 1840 | 3.90 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 98.6% |
| 2010 | CT | 1820 | 3.84 | Top 25% | Caucasian | 98.6% |
| 2010 | NJ | 1820 | 0.00 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 33.4% |
| 2010 | XX | 1810 | 3.76 | Top 5% | Hispanic | 98.0% |
| 2010 | RI | 1800 | 3.00 | Top 30% | Caucasian | 96.2% |
| 2010 | NH | 1800 | 3.40 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 97.4% |
| 2010 | MA | 1800 | 3.70 | Bottom 50% | None Indicated | 98.8% |
| 2010 | NY | 1790 | 3.80 | Top 10% | East Asian | 98.2% |
| 2010 | PA | 1760 | 3.20 | Top 25% | Hispanic | 97.6% |
| 2010 | NY | 1750 | 3.68 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 98.6% |
| 2010 | NE | 1750 | 3.20 | Bottom 50% | Caucasian | 98.1% |
| 2010 | MA | 1750 | 3.20 | Top 30% | Caucasian | 97.0% |
| 2010 | MA | 1720 | 3.30 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 96.3% |
| 2010 | VA | 1710 | 3.30 | Class Not Ranked | East Asian | 96.2% |
| 2010 | NY | 1710 | 3.70 | Unknown | East Asian | 97.7% |
| 2010 | FL | 1710 | 2.70 | Top 40% | Caucasian | 94.3% |
| 2010 | NY | 1700 | 3.30 | Unknown | East Asian | 96.2% |
| 2010 | NJ | 1690 | 3.31 | Top 25% | Caucasian | 96.6% |
| 2010 | MD | 1680 | 2.85 | Unknown | Middle-Eastern | 93.1% |
| 2010 | NJ | 1660 | 2.50 | Bottom 50% | Caucasian | 93.8% |
| 2010 | NJ | 1660 | 3.46 | Bottom 50% | Caucasian | 97.9% |
| 2010 | NJ | 1660 | 2.98 | Top 40% | Caucasian | 95.5% |
| 2010 | MD | 1660 | 2.70 | Class Not Ranked | African-American | 91.5% |
| 2010 | NJ | 1660 | 3.70 | Unknown | Caucasian | 97.5% |
| 2010 | CT | 1650 | 3.50 | Top 25% | Caucasian | 97.1% |
| 2010 | NY | 1650 | 3.00 | Top 25% | Caucasian | 94.6% |
| 2010 | WA | 1640 | 3.34 | Bottom 50% | South Asian | 97.8% |
| 2010 | NY | 1640 | 3.10 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 94.5% |
| 2010 | PA | 1640 | 3.50 | Unknown | Caucasian | 96.6% |
| 2010 | NJ | 1630 | 3.00 | Top 40% | South Asian | 96.9% |
| 2010 | NY | 1630 | 3.00 | Unknown | Caucasian | 93.7% |
| 2010 | NY | 1630 | 3.72 | Top 15% | Caucasian | 97.4% |
| 2010 | NY | 1590 | 3.36 | Unknown | East Asian | 95.6% |
| 2010 | NY | 1550 | 3.70 | Top 5% | East Asian | 96.4% |
| 2010 | NY | 1520 | 3.60 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 96.2% |
| 2010 | ME | 1500 | 3.71 | Top 15% | Caucasian | 96.6% |
| 2010 | MA | 1460 | 2.90 | Bottom 50% | African-American | 94.0% |
| 2010 | NY | 1450 | 3.00 | Top 40% | Caucasian | 95.7% |
| 2010 | NY | 1440 | 3.58 | Top 30% | East Asian | 96.3% |
| 2010 | NJ | 1440 | 3.86 | Top 25% | Caucasian | 97.2% |
| 2010 | PA | 1440 | 2.60 | Bottom 50% | Caucasian | 90.7% |
| 2010 | CA | 1420 | 2.95 | Unknown | African-American | 93.0% |
| 2010 | FL | 1420 | 2.90 | Unknown | Hispanic | 89.5% |
| 2010 | NY | 1420 | 3.50 | Top 25% | Caucasian | 95.5% |
| 2010 | NY | 1390 | 3.50 | Class Not Ranked | African-American | 94.5% |
| 2010 | NY | 1380 | 3.40 | Unknown | Caucasian | 93.7% |
| 2010 | NJ | 1380 | 2.90 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 88.8% |
| 2010 | DE | 1370 | 2.80 | Top 30% | South Asian | 89.3% |
| 2010 | NY | 1350 | 3.20 | Unknown | East Asian | 91.6% |
| 2010 | NY | 1310 | 3.52 | Top 25% | African-American | 94.6% |
| 2010 | TX | 1310 | 3.10 | Top 30% | Middle-Eastern | 91.6% |
| 2010 | PA | 1260 | 3.25 | Top 40% | Hispanic | 94.4% |
| 2010 | RI | 1250 | 2.90 | Bottom 50% | Caucasian | 90.7% |
| 2010 | NJ | 1210 | 2.70 | Unknown | Hispanic | 81.3% |
| 2010 | ME | 930 | 3.20 | Top 40% | Caucasian | 94.4% |
| 2010 | NY | 900 | 2.50 | Bottom 0% | African-American | 85.0% |
| 2010 | IL | 36 | 3.90 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 99.5% |
| 2010 | NY | 32 | 3.52 | Top 30% | South Asian | 99.0% |
| 2010 | AZ | 26 | 2.80 | Class Not Ranked | Hispanic | 94.0% |
| 2010 | NY | 25 | 2.90 | Class Not Ranked | Middle-Eastern | 94.0% |
| 2010 | PA | 25 | 3.24 | Bottom 50% | Caucasian | 97.5% |
| 2010 | CA | 20 | 2.30 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 80.1% |
| 2010 | OH | 20 | 3.60 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 95.2% |
| 2010 | FL | 15 | 3.40 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 89.7% |
| 2009 | NY | 2400 | 3.90 | Top 1% | South Asian | 99.5% |
| 2009 | (Private) | 2400 | 4.00 | Valedictorian | African-American | 99.5% |
| 2009 | MA | 2340 | 2.50 | Unknown | Middle-Eastern | 97.0% |
| 2009 | MA | 2340 | 3.40 | Unknown | Middle-Eastern | 99.0% |
| 2009 | NY | 2150 | 4.00 | Top 1% | Caucasian | 99.4% |
| 2009 | MA | 2130 | 4.00 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 99.3% |
| 2009 | NY | 2110 | 3.40 | Top 20% | African-American | 98.6% |
| 2009 | FL | 2080 | 3.20 | Top 20% | Other | 98.0% |
| 2009 | NJ | 2060 | 3.00 | Class Not Ranked | Other | 97.2% |
| 2009 | NY | 2010 | 3.18 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 97.6% |
| 2009 | XX | 2000 | 4.00 | Valedictorian | East Asian | 98.9% |
| 2009 | NJ | 1970 | 3.00 | Class Not Ranked | Other | 98.6% |
| 2009 | NJ | 1970 | 3.00 | Class Not Ranked | Other | 96.7% |
| 2009 | NJ | 1970 | 3.00 | Class Not Ranked | Other | 96.7% |
| 2009 | NJ | 1970 | 3.05 | Class Not Ranked | Other | 96.9% |
| 2009 | NJ | 1970 | 3.00 | Class Not Ranked | Other | 96.7% |
| 2009 | HI | 1960 | 3.50 | Class Not Ranked | Other | 98.2% |
| 2009 | MA | 1960 | 3.00 | Bottom 50% | Caucasian | 97.9% |
| 2009 | NY | 1950 | 3.40 | Unknown | African-American | 97.9% |
| 2009 | MD | 1930 | 3.50 | Top 25% | Caucasian | 98.3% |
| 2009 | MA | 1930 | 3.61 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 98.2% |
| 2009 | NY | 1930 | 3.63 | Unknown | Caucasian | 98.4% |
| 2009 | NY | 1920 | 2.90 | Class Not Ranked | South Asian | 95.9% |
| 2009 | NJ | 1910 | 3.87 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 98.7% |
| 2009 | PA | 1890 | 3.84 | Unknown | Caucasian | 98.6% |
| 2009 | FL | 1880 | 3.75 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 98.7% |
| 2009 | MD | 1880 | 3.00 | Top 30% | Caucasian | 96.8% |
| 2009 | XX | 1870 | 3.70 | Class Not Ranked | East Asian | 98.3% |
| 2009 | PA | 1870 | 3.60 | Top 5% | South Asian | 97.8% |
| 2009 | NY | 1860 | 3.00 | Class Not Ranked | African-American | 95.9% |
| 2009 | NY | 1850 | 2.70 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 94.0% |
| 2009 | NY | 1820 | 3.00 | Unknown | South Asian | 95.6% |
| 2009 | NY | 1800 | 3.75 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 98.2% |
| 2009 | CT | 1800 | 3.20 | Top 40% | Caucasian | 97.4% |
| 2009 | NJ | 1790 | 3.00 | Top 30% | Caucasian | 96.4% |
| 2009 | MA | 1780 | 3.30 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 96.9% |
| 2009 | NY | 1780 | 3.20 | Class Not Ranked | African-American | 96.3% |
| 2009 | PA | 1780 | 3.00 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 95.2% |
| 2009 | NC | 1760 | 3.50 | Unknown | Caucasian | 97.5% |
| 2009 | CT | 1760 | 3.00 | Top 30% | Caucasian | 95.9% |
| 2009 | NJ | 1760 | 3.50 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 97.5% |
| 2009 | NY | 1750 | 3.80 | Top 10% | East Asian | 98.8% |
| 2009 | IA | 1750 | 2.66 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 92.4% |
| 2009 | RI | 1730 | 2.30 | Bottom 20% | Caucasian | 94.7% |
| 2009 | CT | 1710 | 3.10 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 95.5% |
| 2009 | NY | 1710 | 3.50 | Unknown | Caucasian | 97.1% |
| 2009 | NY | 1700 | 3.50 | Top 20% | Hispanic | 97.2% |
| 2009 | NY | 1700 | 3.00 | Top 40% | Caucasian | 96.0% |
| 2009 | RI | 1690 | 2.73 | Bottom 40% | Caucasian | 95.6% |
| 2009 | NY | 1690 | 3.70 | Top 20% | Hispanic | 97.8% |
| 2009 | NJ | 1690 | 3.80 | Top 1% | Caucasian | 97.5% |
| 2009 | MA | 1680 | 3.20 | Top 40% | None Indicated | 96.7% |
| 2009 | GA | 1650 | 3.65 | Top 30% | Caucasian | 97.7% |
| 2009 | MA | 1650 | 2.64 | Unknown | Caucasian | 90.7% |
| 2009 | WA | 1640 | 3.90 | Top 30% | Caucasian | 99.0% |
| 2009 | IA | 1630 | 2.80 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 92.0% |
| 2009 | NY | 1630 | 3.50 | Class Not Ranked | Hispanic | 96.6% |
| 2009 | MA | 1590 | 3.36 | Top 30% | Caucasian | 96.5% |
| 2009 | NJ | 1580 | 3.30 | Top 40% | Caucasian | 96.5% |
| 2009 | MA | 1550 | 2.50 | Bottom 50% | Caucasian | 92.2% |
| 2009 | NJ | 1550 | 3.73 | Top 20% | South Asian | 97.2% |
| 2009 | CA | 1540 | 3.70 | Top 5% | Hispanic | 96.8% |
| 2009 | NJ | 1540 | 3.30 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 94.8% |
| 2009 | NY | 1530 | 3.70 | Top 40% | Other | 97.6% |
| 2009 | NJ | 1500 | 2.00 | Bottom 50% | Caucasian | 83.6% |
| 2009 | NY | 1480 | 3.10 | Bottom 50% | Other | 95.2% |
| 2009 | VT | 1470 | 3.20 | Bottom 50% | Caucasian | 95.7% |
| 2009 | MA | 1450 | 3.46 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 94.9% |
| 2009 | NY | 1420 | 3.00 | Unknown | African-American | 90.7% |
| 2009 | OH | 1380 | 3.60 | Unknown | African-American | 95.5% |
| 2009 | CA | 1340 | 2.89 | Class Not Ranked | Hispanic | 89.5% |
| 2009 | NY | 1300 | 2.75 | Unknown | Other | 84.7% |
| 2009 | GA | 1040 | 2.59 | Unknown | East Asian | 88.4% |
| 2009 | PA | 28 | 3.25 | Top 40% | Other | 98.0% |
| 2009 | CA | 24 | 3.10 | Bottom 50% | Hispanic | 96.6% |
| 2009 | NH | 23 | 3.61 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 96.6% |
| 2009 | NJ | 22 | 3.79 | Top 15% | Caucasian | 97.2% |
| 2009 | WV | 21 | 1.94 | Unknown | Hispanic | 74.1% |
| 2008 | NY | 2210 | 3.60 | Top 20% | Hispanic | 99.1% |
| 2008 | (Private) | 2070 | 3.92 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 99.0% |
| 2008 | PA | 2070 | 4.00 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 99.1% |
| 2008 | NY | 2010 | 3.70 | Top 5% | East Asian | 98.5% |
| 2008 | NY | 2000 | 3.30 | Top 40% | Caucasian | 98.5% |
| 2008 | MA | 1910 | 3.14 | Top 40% | None Indicated | 97.7% |
| 2008 | CT | 1900 | 2.80 | Bottom 40% | Caucasian | 97.3% |
| 2008 | (Private) | 1850 | 3.65 | Top 30% | Caucasian | 98.5% |
| 2008 | NY | 1800 | 3.40 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 97.4% |
| 2008 | NJ | 1770 | 3.85 | Top 20% | East Asian | 98.6% |
| 2008 | NY | 1720 | 3.75 | Top 20% | African-American | 98.7% |
| 2008 | NJ | 1700 | 2.90 | Unknown | South Asian | 93.8% |
| 2008 | GA | 1580 | 3.50 | Bottom 50% | Caucasian | 97.6% |
| 2008 | NY | 1580 | 3.40 | Unknown | Other | 95.7% |
| 2008 | NJ | 1560 | 3.50 | Unknown | Caucasian | 96.1% |
| 2008 | NJ | 1550 | 3.00 | Bottom 40% | Caucasian | 95.9% |
| 2008 | MA | 1480 | 3.10 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 93.1% |
| 2008 | TX | 1400 | 2.90 | Top 30% | African-American | 91.0% |
| 2008 | NY | 1240 | 2.60 | Unknown | Caucasian | 80.3% |
| 2008 | NY | 1170 | 4.00 | Top 5% | Hispanic | 98.4% |
| 2008 | NY | 28 | 3.10 | Top 30% | None Indicated | 97.2% |
| 2008 | (Private) | 27 | 3.15 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 96.4% |
| 2008 | MA | 25 | 3.10 | Bottom 50% | African-American | 97.0% |
| 2008 | IL | 19 | 3.00 | Top 10% | African-American | 89.1% |
| 2007 | NC | 1840 | 3.08 | Top 30% | Caucasian | 96.8% |
| 2007 | NH | 1800 | 3.20 | Top 30% | Caucasian | 97.0% |
| 2007 | RI | 1640 | 2.80 | Unknown | Caucasian | 92.1% |
| |