Hofstra University Applications and Decisions
Below is a list of applicants who have demonstrated interest in Hofstra University. Our best formula
for this college is based on
59 members who were accepted or rejected. The formula
has a college admissions prediction accuracy of
100%?.
Because not all members have filled out the most recent version of our survey, some predictions are made based on
less-accurate models. Those are noted with an asterisk (*) next to their prediction.
This is a very popular school, so we're only showing you profiles that have received an admissions decision. If you
want to see all applicants to this school,
click here (caution: the page will take awhile to load).
|
| 2009 | MA | 1940 | 3.27 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 97.5% |
| 2009 | NY | 1500 | 3.50 | Bottom 40% | South Asian | 97.5% |
| 2008 | MA | 1720 | 3.20 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 96.1% |
|
| 2009 | CA | 2370 | 4.00 | Top 1% | Caucasian | 99.5% |
| 2009 | IL | 2200 | 3.97 | Top 1% | Caucasian | 99.4% |
| 2009 | NY | 2090 | 3.80 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 98.9% |
| 2009 | PA | 2030 | 4.00 | Salutatorian | Hispanic | 99.0% |
| 2009 | NY | 2020 | 3.00 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 97.0% |
| 2009 | VA | 2000 | 3.00 | Unknown | East Asian | 96.9% |
| 2009 | MA | 1970 | 3.40 | Top 30% | Caucasian | 98.4% |
| 2009 | RI | 1940 | 2.68 | Unknown | Hispanic | 94.8% |
| 2009 | CA | 1930 | 3.53 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 99.0% |
| 2009 | NY | 1930 | 3.40 | Top 30% | East Asian | 98.2% |
| 2009 | XX | 1900 | 3.94 | Top 5% | Other | 98.7% |
| 2009 | RI | 1880 | 3.50 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 98.3% |
| 2009 | CT | 1880 | 2.90 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 95.6% |
| 2009 | CT | 1880 | 2.50 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 92.8% |
| 2009 | CA | 1850 | 3.20 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 97.0% |
| 2009 | HI | 1840 | 2.97 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 95.6% |
| 2009 | NH | 1830 | 3.00 | Top 10% | East Asian | 95.4% |
| 2009 | CT | 1830 | 3.69 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 98.3% |
| 2009 | MA | 1810 | 2.80 | Top 40% | Caucasian | 95.8% |
| 2009 | NJ | 1800 | 3.50 | Unknown | Caucasian | 97.5% |
| 2009 | FL | 1790 | 3.40 | Bottom 50% | South Asian | 98.2% |
| 2009 | NJ | 1780 | 3.60 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 97.9% |
| 2009 | NY | 1770 | 2.90 | Unknown | Caucasian | 94.5% |
| 2009 | XX | 1750 | 3.81 | Class Not Ranked | East Asian | 98.1% |
| 2009 | MD | 1740 | 2.70 | Class Not Ranked | East Asian | 93.8% |
| 2009 | RI | 1740 | 3.40 | Top 30% | Caucasian | 97.4% |
| 2009 | NY | 1720 | 3.00 | Class Not Ranked | Hispanic | 95.3% |
| 2009 | NJ | 1700 | 2.86 | Unknown | Other | 93.5% |
| 2009 | MD | 1680 | 3.43 | Top 40% | Caucasian | 97.5% |
| 2009 | CT | 1670 | 2.80 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 92.6% |
| 2009 | PA | 1640 | 3.89 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 97.8% |
| 2009 | NY | 1560 | 3.50 | Top 5% | South Asian | 95.5% |
| 2009 | PA | 1560 | 3.30 | Top 40% | Caucasian | 96.4% |
| 2009 | NY | 1450 | 3.63 | Top 20% | Hispanic | 96.1% |
| 2009 | CT | 1420 | 2.77 | Top 30% | Caucasian | 89.8% |
| 2009 | NJ | 27 | 3.30 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 97.0% |
| 2009 | NY | 26 | 3.76 | Top 1% | South Asian | 97.8% |
| 2008 | (Private) | 2310 | 4.00 | Top 1% | Caucasian | 99.4% |
| 2008 | NH | 2130 | 3.20 | Top 40% | Hispanic | 98.6% |
| 2008 | NH | 2070 | 3.80 | Unknown | None Indicated | 99.0% |
| 2008 | NY | 2040 | 3.80 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 99.1% |
| 2008 | PA | 2020 | 3.70 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 99.2% |
| 2008 | NY | 2020 | 3.70 | Top 10% | Hispanic | 98.7% |
| 2008 | NY | 2000 | 3.65 | Top 20% | None Indicated | 98.7% |
| 2008 | NY | 1910 | 3.80 | Top 20% | East Asian | 98.7% |
| 2008 | CT | 1910 | 3.00 | Bottom 40% | Caucasian | 97.9% |
| 2008 | MD | 1900 | 3.10 | Unknown | Caucasian | 96.6% |
| 2008 | NY | 1830 | 3.20 | Top 20% | South Asian | 96.8% |
| 2008 | (Private) | 1750 | 2.80 | Unknown | None Indicated | 93.6% |
| 2008 | MA | 1620 | 2.89 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 93.2% |
| 2008 | NY | 1550 | 3.50 | Top 30% | Caucasian | 97.9% |
| 2008 | NY | 1490 | 3.75 | Top 20% | None Indicated | 96.9% |
| 2008 | LA | 29 | 3.67 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 98.6% |
| |