Hobart and William Smith Colleges Applications and Decisions
Below is a list of applicants who have demonstrated interest in Hobart and William Smith Colleges. Our best formula
for this college is based on
14 members who were accepted or rejected. The formula
has a college admissions prediction accuracy of
93%?.
Because not all members have filled out the most recent version of our survey, some predictions are made based on
less-accurate models. Those are noted with an asterisk (*) next to their prediction.
|
| 2009 | MA | 1890 | 2.85 | Top 30% | Caucasian | 60.0% |
| 2009 | NY | 1850 | 3.00 | Class Not Ranked | Hispanic | 92.8% |
|
| 2010 | NC | 1990 | 3.75 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 50.4% |
| 2009 | (Private) | 2240 | 3.75 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 87.0% |
| 2009 | MA | 2090 | 3.60 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 55.6% |
| 2009 | NY | 2000 | 3.80 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 87.1% |
| 2009 | NY | 1830 | 3.80 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 87.9% |
| 2009 | NY | 1800 | 3.50 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 91.1% |
| 2009 | (Private) | 1710 | 2.99 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 64.3% |
| 2009 | NY | 1690 | 2.93 | Class Not Ranked | Hispanic | 93.0% |
| 2009 | (Private) | 1640 | 3.30 | Top 25% | Caucasian | 50.1% |
| 2006 | NY | 2010 | 3.30 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 89.8% |
|
| 2009 | MA | 1880 | 2.69 | Bottom 40% | Caucasian | 45.4% |
| 2009 | NY | 1810 | 3.00 | Unknown | Hispanic | 92.8% |
|
|
| 2009 | XX | 1940 | 3.95 | Top 20% | South Asian | 38.9% |
| 2009 | NC | 1860 | 2.76 | Unknown | Caucasian | 70.4% |
|
| 2010 | MA | 2160 | 2.75 | Class Not Ranked | African-American | 72.3% |
| 2010 | CO | 2080 | 3.27 | Top 30% | Caucasian | 50.7% |
| 2010 | (Private) | 2060 | 2.67 | Class Not Ranked | None Indicated | 95.0% |
| 2010 | CT | 2030 | 3.80 | Unknown | Caucasian | 46.3% |
| 2010 | NY | 2010 | 3.79 | Top 2% | Caucasian | 89.3% |
| 2010 | NY | 1890 | 2.70 | Unknown | Caucasian | 94.7% |
| 2010 | ME | 1760 | 3.25 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 58.4% |
| 2010 | NJ | 1630 | 2.90 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 65.9% |
| 2010 | CT | 1600 | 3.14 | Unknown | East Asian | 60.0% |
| 2010 | NY | 1500 | 4.00 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 78.8% |
| 2010 | NY | 1480 | 3.75 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 82.7% |
| 2009 | NY | 2000 | 4.00 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 86.2% |
| 2009 | RI | 1920 | 3.35 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 60.0% |
| 2009 | ME | 1840 | 3.20 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 58.2% |
| 2009 | CT | 29 | 3.20 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 60.9% |
| 2009 | GA | 25 | 3.40 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 51.2% |
| 2008 | CA | 2020 | 3.20 | Unknown | Caucasian | 61.3% |
| 2008 | NY | 1700 | 3.40 | Unknown | Caucasian | 89.2% |
| 2007 | NJ | 2190 | 3.74 | Top 30% | East Asian | 39.7% |
| 2007 | MA | 1740 | 3.13 | Unknown | African-American | 61.2% |
| 2006 | NY | 2210 | 3.70 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 90.0% |
|
| 2011 | NH | 2120 | 3.40 | Top 15% | Caucasian | 57.1% |
| 2011 | NC | 2050 | 3.50 | Unknown | Caucasian | 54.1% |
| 2011 | MA | 1950 | 3.60 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 54.0% |
| 2011 | OH | 1850 | 3.70 | Top 30% | Caucasian | 38.4% |
| 2011 | NY | 1800 | 3.50 | Top 30% | Caucasian | 84.0% |
| 2011 | NY | 1690 | 2.90 | Bottom 30% | Caucasian | 77.5% |
| 2011 | MA | 1550 | 3.00 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 63.1% |
| 2011 | CT | 1380 | 2.50 | Unknown | None Indicated | 73.1% |
| 2010 | XX | 2200 | 3.80 | Top 5% | East Asian | 53.7% |
| 2010 | XX | 2170 | 4.00 | Top 2% | East Asian | 50.3% |
| 2010 | CT | 2100 | 3.60 | Unknown | None Indicated | 51.9% |
| 2010 | IL | 2020 | 3.50 | Top 25% | African-American | 47.6% |
| 2010 | CT | 2020 | 3.88 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 47.3% |
| 2010 | MA | 2020 | 3.75 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 44.4% |
| 2010 | MA | 2010 | 3.75 | Top 15% | Caucasian | 47.4% |
| 2010 | MA | 1990 | 3.40 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 56.2% |
| 2010 | XX | 1990 | 3.69 | Top 25% | East Asian | 42.6% |
| 2010 | MA | 1950 | 3.39 | Top 40% | Caucasian | 40.6% |
| 2010 | MD | 1930 | 3.00 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 66.0% |
| 2010 | NY | 1910 | 3.00 | Bottom 50% | Caucasian | 84.5% |
| 2010 | VA | 1910 | 3.87 | Unknown | Caucasian | 43.7% |
| 2010 | NY | 1900 | 3.50 | Top 20% | Hispanic | 87.4% |
| 2010 | XX | 1900 | 3.50 | Top 5% | South Asian | 59.2% |
| 2010 | XX | 1860 | 3.80 | Top 5% | Other | 51.4% |
| 2010 | (Private) | 1860 | 3.60 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 87.5% |
| 2010 | MI | 1830 | 3.40 | Top 30% | Caucasian | 45.7% |
| 2010 | MA | 1820 | 2.98 | Top 25% | Caucasian | 59.4% |
| 2010 | XX | 1790 | 3.48 | Top 4% | East Asian | 59.6% |
| 2010 | NY | 1790 | 3.00 | Top 40% | Caucasian | 87.2% |
| 2010 | CA | 1770 | 3.10 | Top 30% | Caucasian | 52.9% |
| 2010 | NY | 1670 | 3.07 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 92.3% |
| 2010 | XX | 1670 | 2.60 | Bottom 50% | South Asian | 52.8% |
| 2010 | CT | 1650 | 3.50 | Top 25% | Caucasian | 45.0% |
| 2010 | NY | 1640 | 3.10 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 91.7% |
| 2010 | FL | 1640 | 3.34 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 55.3% |
| 2010 | NY | 1560 | 3.59 | Unknown | Hispanic | 86.7% |
| 2010 | CA | 1440 | 3.20 | Class Not Ranked | Other | 57.4% |
| 2010 | ME | 1400 | 2.33 | Unknown | African-American | 76.4% |
| 2010 | NY | 1260 | 3.40 | Top 30% | Caucasian | 83.3% |
| 2010 | NY | 1250 | 3.00 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 91.6% |
| 2010 | NJ | 1090 | 4.00 | Unknown | Caucasian | 38.6% |
| 2010 | (Private) | 30 | 3.60 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 51.3% |
| 2010 | (Private) | 24 | 3.30 | Top 40% | Caucasian | 40.9% |
| 2010 | CA | 23 | 3.13 | Unknown | Caucasian | 60.3% |
| 2009 | NJ | 2200 | 4.00 | Class Not Ranked | South Asian | 42.4% |
| 2009 | XX | 2170 | 3.70 | Top 5% | None Indicated | 56.1% |
| 2009 | XX | 2150 | 3.80 | Class Not Ranked | South Asian | 47.1% |
| 2009 | MA | 2110 | 3.40 | Class Not Ranked | None Indicated | 57.0% |
| 2009 | NJ | 2030 | 3.76 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 44.2% |
| 2009 | CT | 1990 | 3.70 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 45.4% |
| 2009 | XX | 1810 | 3.80 | Top 5% | South Asian | 51.0% |
| 2009 | MA | 1810 | 3.50 | Valedictorian | Caucasian | 61.6% |
| 2009 | ME | 1800 | 3.30 | Bottom 50% | Caucasian | 36.1% |
| 2009 | XX | 1690 | 3.30 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 59.7% |
| 2009 | NY | 1690 | 3.70 | Top 20% | Hispanic | 84.2% |
| 2009 | MA | 1680 | 3.20 | Top 40% | None Indicated | 43.5% |
| 2009 | CT | 1660 | 3.33 | Top 40% | Caucasian | 40.2% |
| 2009 | NJ | 1640 | 3.64 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 47.7% |
| 2009 | NH | 1360 | 3.50 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 60.1% |
| 2009 | FL | 31 | 3.50 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 54.2% |
| 2009 | NY | 31 | 4.00 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 86.4% |
| 2009 | AR | 29 | 3.23 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 60.1% |
| 2009 | NY | 28 | 2.80 | Unknown | Caucasian | 94.1% |
| 2009 | NY | 27 | 3.80 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 83.4% |
| 2009 | (Private) | 26 | 3.60 | Unknown | Caucasian | 49.7% |
| 2009 | NY | 26 | 3.65 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 85.2% |
| 2008 | NY | 2210 | 3.90 | Unknown | Caucasian | 85.1% |
| 2008 | NH | 2130 | 3.20 | Top 40% | Hispanic | 46.6% |
| 2008 | GA | 2110 | 3.85 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 48.7% |
| 2008 | IL | 2080 | 2.80 | Unknown | Caucasian | 71.4% |
| 2008 | OH | 2060 | 3.66 | Unknown | Middle-Eastern | 50.1% |
| 2008 | NY | 2000 | 3.30 | Top 40% | Caucasian | 84.1% |
| 2008 | WA | 1940 | 3.76 | Top 10% | None Indicated | 49.9% |
| 2008 | MA | 1910 | 3.40 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 52.5% |
| 2008 | VT | 1880 | 3.67 | Top 10% | None Indicated | 51.7% |
| 2008 | ME | 1870 | 3.30 | Bottom 40% | Caucasian | 30.7% |
| 2008 | CT | 1730 | 3.20 | Unknown | Caucasian | 59.4% |
| 2008 | PA | 1660 | 3.76 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 41.7% |
| 2008 | NJ | 1350 | 3.47 | Top 20% | East Asian | 46.9% |
| 2008 | CT | 32 | 3.70 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 52.7% |
| 2008 | IL | 28 | 2.90 | Bottom 50% | Caucasian | 46.3% |
| 2008 | MN | 26 | 3.30 | Top 30% | Caucasian | 47.9% |
| 2007 | NY | 2030 | 3.50 | Top 10% | South Asian | 90.2% |
| 2004 | NJ | 1050 | 3.20 | Top 30% | Caucasian | 49.0% |
| |