Gettysburg College Applications and Decisions
Below is a list of applicants who have demonstrated interest in Gettysburg College. Our best formula
for this college is based on
21 members who were accepted or rejected. The formula
has a college admissions prediction accuracy of
90%?.
Because not all members have filled out the most recent version of our survey, some predictions are made based on
less-accurate models. Those are noted with an asterisk (*) next to their prediction.
This is a very popular school, and you're looking at the whole list. If you
would like to only see completed applications,
click here for a smaller version of this page.
|
| 2009 | PA | 2180 | 3.60 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 99.0% |
| 2009 | CA | 2080 | 3.50 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 98.8% |
| 2009 | NH | 1990 | 3.40 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 98.2% |
|
| 2009 | PA | 2230 | 3.45 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 98.9% |
| 2009 | PA | 2070 | 3.95 | Top 1% | Caucasian | 99.0% |
| 2009 | CT | 2050 | 3.30 | Unknown | Caucasian | 98.0% |
| 2009 | PA | 1980 | 3.81 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 98.7% |
| 2009 | NY | 1850 | 3.00 | Class Not Ranked | Hispanic | 95.8% |
| 2009 | WI | 32 | 3.75 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 99.0% |
| 2009 | (Private) | 28 | 3.90 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 98.6% |
| 2009 | FL | 27 | 3.35 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 97.0% |
| 2008 | (Private) | 2290 | 3.80 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 99.3% |
| 2008 | NY | 2010 | 3.30 | Unknown | None Indicated | 97.9% |
| 2008 | NY | 1990 | 3.70 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 98.8% |
| 2008 | NY | 1990 | 3.30 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 97.8% |
| 2008 | PA | 1980 | 3.60 | Top 10% | African-American | 98.4% |
| 2008 | CT | 1930 | 3.78 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 98.6% |
| 2008 | PA | 1880 | 3.30 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 97.3% |
| 2003 | NJ | 1420 | 3.80 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 99.0% |
|
| 2009 | (Private) | 1790 | 3.45 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 97.3% |
| 2008 | XX | 30 | 3.85 | Unknown | Other | 98.9% |
| 2006 | NY | 2010 | 3.30 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 98.0% |
|
|
| 2009 | XX | 2170 | 3.70 | Top 5% | None Indicated | 98.9% |
| 2009 | XX | 1940 | 3.95 | Top 20% | South Asian | 99.0% |
|
| 2010 | (Private) | 2130 | 3.84 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 99.0% |
| 2010 | (Private) | 2060 | 2.67 | Class Not Ranked | None Indicated | 95.8% |
| 2010 | CT | 2030 | 3.80 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 98.8% |
| 2010 | PA | 1980 | 4.00 | Top 1% | Caucasian | 99.2% |
| 2010 | XX | 1940 | 3.94 | Valedictorian | Other | 98.7% |
| 2010 | CA | 1880 | 3.75 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 98.6% |
| 2010 | ME | 1850 | 3.88 | Top 15% | Middle-Eastern | 98.9% |
| 2010 | NJ | 1850 | 3.42 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 97.5% |
| 2010 | (Private) | 1840 | 3.40 | Top 30% | Caucasian | 97.9% |
| 2010 | NJ | 1820 | 3.36 | Class Not Ranked | East Asian | 97.2% |
| 2010 | MD | 1800 | 4.00 | Top 4% | Hispanic | 98.5% |
| 2010 | XX | 1770 | 3.60 | Top 1% | South Asian | 97.2% |
| 2010 | CT | 1740 | 3.60 | Top 20% | East Asian | 98.5% |
| 2010 | PA | 1710 | 3.46 | Class Not Ranked | Hispanic | 96.9% |
| 2010 | CA | 1690 | 3.68 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 97.5% |
| 2010 | NY | 1680 | 3.20 | Top 25% | Caucasian | 96.0% |
| 2010 | NJ | 31 | 3.50 | Top 25% | Caucasian | 98.7% |
| 2010 | NJ | 25 | 3.00 | Top 20% | African-American | 95.0% |
| 2009 | CT | 2250 | 3.60 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 99.1% |
| 2009 | NJ | 2150 | 4.00 | Top 1% | Caucasian | 99.2% |
| 2009 | MD | 2020 | 4.00 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 99.1% |
| 2009 | (Private) | 1940 | 3.80 | Top 5% | South Asian | 98.5% |
| 2009 | NJ | 1790 | 4.00 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 98.5% |
| 2009 | NY | 1770 | 3.20 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 95.9% |
| 2009 | NJ | 1720 | 3.50 | Unknown | Caucasian | 97.1% |
| 2009 | NJ | 1510 | 3.31 | Class Not Ranked | None Indicated | 94.5% |
| 2009 | CT | 29 | 3.20 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 97.3% |
| 2009 | NJ | 28 | 3.55 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 98.1% |
| 2008 | PA | 2240 | 3.45 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 99.0% |
| 2008 | PA | 2040 | 3.45 | Unknown | Caucasian | 98.4% |
| 2008 | MD | 2010 | 3.63 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 98.5% |
| 2008 | NY | 1990 | 4.00 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 99.1% |
| 2008 | NY | 1980 | 3.60 | Unknown | Caucasian | 98.7% |
| 2008 | NJ | 1920 | 3.50 | Top 5% | Other | 97.8% |
| 2008 | PA | 1910 | 3.45 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 98.0% |
| 2008 | MD | 1590 | 2.87 | Unknown | None Indicated | 92.1% |
| 2008 | MA | 34 | 3.94 | Top 5% | None Indicated | 99.4% |
| 2007 | MD | 2020 | 4.00 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 99.0% |
|
| 2012 | NJ | 1530 | 3.30 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 94.7% |
| 2011 | MD | 2260 | 3.80 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 99.3% |
| 2011 | NY | 2030 | 3.15 | Class Not Ranked | East Asian | 97.6% |
| 2011 | CT | 1990 | 3.50 | Unknown | Caucasian | 98.3% |
| 2011 | RI | 1960 | 3.10 | Unknown | Caucasian | 97.0% |
| 2011 | NC | 1910 | 3.40 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 98.1% |
| 2011 | CA | 1890 | 2.80 | Unknown | Caucasian | 95.1% |
| 2011 | OH | 1850 | 3.70 | Top 30% | Caucasian | 98.6% |
| 2011 | PA | 1830 | 3.24 | Unknown | Caucasian | 96.8% |
| 2011 | MI | 1800 | 3.50 | Unknown | Caucasian | 97.5% |
| 2011 | CA | 1680 | 3.20 | Unknown | Other | 95.5% |
| 2011 | DE | 1570 | 2.50 | Bottom 50% | African-American | 91.7% |
| 2011 | NY | 1490 | 3.60 | Top 10% | Hispanic | 95.8% |
| 2011 | MD | 27 | 3.95 | Top 5% | None Indicated | 98.5% |
| 2010 | XX | 2360 | 3.90 | Top 5% | East Asian | 99.4% |
| 2010 | NY | 2320 | 3.35 | Top 30% | Caucasian | 99.1% |
| 2010 | NJ | 2230 | 4.00 | Top 2% | Caucasian | 99.3% |
| 2010 | IN | 2190 | 3.40 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 98.6% |
| 2010 | NJ | 2160 | 3.70 | Top 3% | Caucasian | 98.9% |
| 2010 | MA | 2140 | 3.90 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 99.1% |
| 2010 | NH | 2110 | 3.85 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 99.1% |
| 2010 | NY | 2100 | 3.76 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 98.9% |
| 2010 | NJ | 2100 | 2.98 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 97.4% |
| 2010 | NJ | 2090 | 0.00 | Bottom 50% | Caucasian | 56.3% |
| 2010 | VT | 2070 | 3.83 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 99.0% |
| 2010 | AZ | 2070 | 3.85 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 99.0% |
| 2010 | MA | 2070 | 2.50 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 95.0% |
| 2010 | PA | 2020 | 3.95 | Top 3% | Caucasian | 98.9% |
| 2010 | NJ | 2020 | 3.40 | Top 15% | None Indicated | 98.2% |
| 2010 | NJ | 2020 | 3.65 | Unknown | Caucasian | 98.7% |
| 2010 | MA | 2020 | 4.00 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 99.1% |
| 2010 | CO | 2010 | 3.35 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 98.0% |
| 2010 | PA | 2010 | 3.85 | Top 20% | East Asian | 99.0% |
| 2010 | NY | 2010 | 3.79 | Top 2% | Caucasian | 98.6% |
| 2010 | MD | 2000 | 3.59 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 98.6% |
| 2010 | NJ | 1980 | 3.28 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 97.7% |
| 2010 | MD | 1960 | 3.60 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 98.5% |
| 2010 | CA | 1960 | 3.50 | Unknown | Caucasian | 98.2% |
| 2010 | (Private) | 1950 | 3.37 | Unknown | None Indicated | 97.8% |
| 2010 | (Private) | 1940 | 3.80 | Top 25% | Caucasian | 98.9% |
| 2010 | PA | 1940 | 3.60 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 98.2% |
| 2010 | OH | 1940 | 4.00 | Valedictorian | Caucasian | 98.8% |
| 2010 | PA | 1930 | 3.90 | Top 3% | Caucasian | 99.0% |
| 2010 | MD | 1930 | 3.00 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 96.9% |
| 2010 | CO | 1930 | 3.30 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 97.5% |
| 2010 | NJ | 1920 | 3.72 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 98.4% |
| 2010 | NJ | 1920 | 3.65 | Unknown | East Asian | 98.4% |
| 2010 | NJ | 1910 | 3.80 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 98.4% |
| 2010 | XX | 1910 | 3.40 | Top 20% | South Asian | 97.9% |
| 2010 | CT | 1900 | 3.28 | Bottom 50% | None Indicated | 98.3% |
| 2010 | XX | 1900 | 3.50 | Top 5% | South Asian | 97.7% |
| 2010 | (Private) | 1890 | 3.54 | Top 5% | None Indicated | 97.8% |
| 2010 | NY | 1890 | 2.70 | Unknown | Caucasian | 94.4% |
| 2010 | NY | 1890 | 3.70 | Top 20% | Hispanic | 98.5% |
| 2010 | XX | 1880 | 4.00 | Top 5% | South Asian | 98.7% |
| 2010 | MA | 1870 | 3.00 | Top 15% | Caucasian | 96.0% |
| 2010 | TX | 1870 | 3.20 | Top 30% | Caucasian | 97.4% |
| 2010 | NJ | 1870 | 3.80 | Unknown | Caucasian | 98.5% |
| 2010 | XX | 1860 | 3.80 | Top 5% | Other | 98.3% |
| 2010 | PA | 1860 | 3.44 | Top 35% | Middle-Eastern | 98.2% |
| 2010 | (Private) | 1850 | 3.90 | Top 3% | Caucasian | 98.4% |
| 2010 | MD | 1840 | 3.37 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 97.3% |
| 2010 | NY | 1840 | 3.02 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 95.8% |
| 2010 | XX | 1830 | 3.70 | Top 1% | Other | 97.8% |
| 2010 | MD | 1820 | 3.66 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 98.1% |
| 2010 | NY | 1810 | 3.70 | Top 15% | Caucasian | 98.1% |
| 2010 | DE | 1810 | 3.77 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 98.1% |
| 2010 | PA | 1790 | 3.80 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 98.2% |
| 2010 | CO | 1780 | 3.80 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 98.3% |
| 2010 | NY | 1760 | 3.40 | Unknown | South Asian | 97.0% |
| 2010 | CA | 1670 | 3.30 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 95.9% |
| 2010 | CT | 1650 | 3.50 | Top 25% | Caucasian | 97.1% |
| 2010 | FL | 1640 | 3.34 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 95.9% |
| 2010 | PA | 1640 | 3.88 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 97.6% |
| 2010 | NJ | 1570 | 3.52 | Top 30% | Caucasian | 96.9% |
| 2010 | NY | 1560 | 3.59 | Unknown | Hispanic | 96.5% |
| 2010 | PA | 1560 | 3.47 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 95.9% |
| 2010 | NY | 1550 | 3.64 | Top 35% | Caucasian | 97.4% |
| 2010 | CA | 1530 | 3.16 | Unknown | Caucasian | 93.7% |
| 2010 | IL | 36 | 3.90 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 99.5% |
| 2010 | PA | 33 | 3.72 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 99.1% |
| 2010 | NJ | 32 | 4.00 | Top 2% | Caucasian | 99.2% |
| 2010 | (Private) | 30 | 3.60 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 98.6% |
| 2010 | NY | 27 | 3.50 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 97.8% |
| 2010 | MA | 26 | 3.59 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 97.7% |
| 2010 | XX | 25 | 3.72 | Top 3% | East Asian | 97.5% |
| 2010 | FL | 15 | 3.40 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 89.7% |
| 2009 | XX | 2240 | 4.00 | Valedictorian | Other | 99.3% |
| 2009 | XX | 2210 | 3.83 | Top 5% | Other | 99.2% |
| 2009 | XX | 2210 | 4.00 | Valedictorian | Other | 99.3% |
| 2009 | XX | 2200 | 3.70 | Top 10% | South Asian | 99.1% |
| 2009 | XX | 2200 | 3.96 | Valedictorian | East Asian | 99.2% |
| 2009 | MA | 2180 | 3.80 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 99.1% |
| 2009 | NY | 2160 | 3.80 | Class Not Ranked | East Asian | 99.2% |
| 2009 | ME | 2130 | 4.00 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 99.2% |
| 2009 | MA | 2100 | 3.50 | Unknown | Caucasian | 98.6% |
| 2009 | NJ | 2100 | 3.60 | Unknown | Other | 98.8% |
| 2009 | XX | 2080 | 4.00 | Top 5% | South Asian | 99.1% |
| 2009 | MD | 2070 | 3.76 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 99.1% |
| 2009 | CT | 2050 | 3.40 | Unknown | Caucasian | 98.3% |
| 2009 | PA | 2050 | 3.20 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 97.8% |
| 2009 | CA | 2050 | 3.45 | Unknown | Caucasian | 98.4% |
| 2009 | XX | 2040 | 3.75 | Top 1% | East Asian | 98.6% |
| 2009 | NY | 2010 | 3.80 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 98.8% |
| 2009 | CA | 2000 | 3.10 | Unknown | Caucasian | 97.2% |
| 2009 | NY | 1950 | 2.80 | Top 40% | Caucasian | 96.8% |
| 2009 | XX | 1950 | 3.90 | Top 1% | South Asian | 98.7% |
| 2009 | NY | 1930 | 2.90 | Unknown | Caucasian | 96.0% |
| 2009 | XX | 1880 | 3.37 | Top 20% | African-American | 97.7% |
| 2009 | NJ | 1880 | 3.50 | Top 30% | East Asian | 98.3% |
| 2009 | PA | 1840 | 3.42 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 97.6% |
| 2009 | NY | 1830 | 4.00 | Valedictorian | None Indicated | 98.8% |
| 2009 | DE | 1830 | 3.40 | Unknown | None Indicated | 97.4% |
| 2009 | CT | 1810 | 3.46 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 97.4% |
| 2009 | XX | 1810 | 3.80 | Top 5% | South Asian | 98.1% |
| 2009 | ME | 1800 | 3.30 | Bottom 50% | Caucasian | 98.1% |
| 2009 | NY | 1800 | 3.75 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 98.2% |
| 2009 | NC | 1740 | 3.19 | Top 30% | African-American | 97.5% |
| 2009 | NY | 1740 | 3.20 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 96.0% |
| 2009 | XX | 1730 | 3.33 | Bottom 50% | Caucasian | 97.8% |
| 2009 | NY | 1700 | 3.00 | Top 40% | Caucasian | 96.0% |
| 2009 | NY | 1700 | 3.64 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 97.1% |
| 2009 | XX | 1690 | 3.30 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 95.8% |
| 2009 | PA | 1690 | 3.30 | Bottom 50% | Caucasian | 97.5% |
| 2009 | PA | 1680 | 4.00 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 98.1% |
| 2009 | NJ | 1640 | 3.64 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 97.2% |
| 2009 | NY | 1600 | 3.47 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 96.4% |
| 2009 | NJ | 1500 | 2.80 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 89.8% |
| 2009 | MA | 1070 | 3.60 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 96.4% |
| 2009 | IL | 32 | 3.60 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 98.9% |
| 2009 | FL | 31 | 3.50 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 98.5% |
| 2009 | MD | 30 | 3.00 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 96.9% |
| 2009 | AR | 29 | 3.23 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 97.4% |
| 2009 | (Private) | 26 | 3.60 | Unknown | Caucasian | 97.8% |
| 2009 | NY | 26 | 3.65 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 98.0% |
| 2009 | VT | 26 | 3.70 | Top 20% | None Indicated | 98.1% |
| 2008 | IL | 2080 | 2.80 | Unknown | Caucasian | 97.2% |
| 2008 | CT | 2080 | 3.80 | Unknown | None Indicated | 99.0% |
| 2008 | MD | 2070 | 4.00 | Top 5% | African-American | 99.1% |
| 2008 | XX | 2060 | 4.00 | Salutatorian | Other | 99.0% |
| 2008 | CT | 2000 | 3.40 | Top 30% | Caucasian | 98.4% |
| 2008 | NY | 1990 | 4.00 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 99.1% |
| 2008 | PA | 1980 | 3.39 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 98.4% |
| 2008 | NY | 1930 | 3.30 | Top 30% | Caucasian | 98.1% |
| 2008 | FL | 1930 | 3.75 | Unknown | Caucasian | 98.6% |
| 2008 | MA | 1910 | 3.40 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 97.9% |
| 2008 | PA | 1890 | 3.80 | Unknown | Caucasian | 98.6% |
| 2008 | ME | 1870 | 3.30 | Bottom 40% | Caucasian | 98.5% |
| 2008 | PA | 1840 | 3.60 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 98.1% |
| 2008 | NJ | 1810 | 3.33 | Unknown | None Indicated | 97.0% |
| 2008 | NJ | 1800 | 3.70 | Unknown | Caucasian | 98.1% |
| 2008 | PA | 1750 | 2.90 | Unknown | Caucasian | 94.3% |
| 2008 | NY | 28 | 3.00 | Top 40% | Caucasian | 97.2% |
| 2008 | VA | 27 | 3.30 | Unknown | Caucasian | 97.0% |
| 2007 | NJ | 1970 | 3.60 | Top 30% | Caucasian | 98.7% |
| 2007 | PA | 1710 | 3.20 | Unknown | Caucasian | 95.7% |
| 2006 | Ot | 2330 | 3.60 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 99.2% |
| |