Elon University Applications and Decisions
Below is a list of applicants who have demonstrated interest in Elon University. Our best formula
for this college is based on
50 members who were accepted or rejected. The formula
has a college admissions prediction accuracy of
88%?.
Because not all members have filled out the most recent version of our survey, some predictions are made based on
less-accurate models. Those are noted with an asterisk (*) next to their prediction.
This is a very popular school, so we're only showing you profiles that have received an admissions decision. If you
want to see all applicants to this school,
click here (caution: the page will take awhile to load).
|
| 2010 | MD | 1890 | 3.15 | Top 25% | Caucasian | 63.6% |
| 2010 | MA | 27 | 3.28 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 40.0% |
| 2009 | MA | 2030 | 3.75 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 94.7% |
| 2007 | MD | 2110 | 2.40 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 44.7% |
|
| 2010 | VA | 2270 | 4.00 | Top 2% | Caucasian | 99.9% |
| 2010 | OH | 2110 | 4.00 | Top 3% | Caucasian | 99.2% |
| 2010 | FL | 2080 | 3.56 | Class Not Ranked | Hispanic | 100.0% |
| 2010 | NH | 2070 | 3.80 | Valedictorian | Other | 95.8% |
| 2010 | NC | 2060 | 3.20 | Class Not Ranked | African-American | 100.0% |
| 2010 | (Private) | 2050 | 3.70 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 97.9% |
| 2010 | (Private) | 2000 | 3.50 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 95.7% |
| 2010 | MA | 1980 | 3.01 | Top 40% | Caucasian | 95.5% |
| 2010 | MD | 1960 | 3.60 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 94.6% |
| 2010 | VA | 1960 | 3.50 | Top 30% | Caucasian | 97.3% |
| 2010 | VT | 1950 | 3.89 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 90.0% |
| 2010 | (Private) | 1930 | 3.70 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 97.0% |
| 2010 | MD | 1920 | 3.89 | Salutatorian | Caucasian | 98.8% |
| 2010 | CT | 1920 | 3.68 | Class Not Ranked | East Asian | 88.3% |
| 2010 | GA | 1900 | 3.90 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 92.9% |
| 2010 | WI | 1890 | 3.60 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 77.5% |
| 2010 | MA | 1880 | 2.86 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 13.4% |
| 2010 | NC | 1880 | 3.56 | Top 15% | Caucasian | 71.9% |
| 2010 | (Private) | 1870 | 3.80 | Top 10% | Hispanic | 100.0% |
| 2010 | VA | 1830 | 3.55 | Top 15% | Caucasian | 52.9% |
| 2010 | VA | 30 | 3.62 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 95.9% |
| 2010 | WA | 30 | 3.86 | Top 15% | Caucasian | 98.4% |
| 2009 | NJ | 2200 | 3.70 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 99.9% |
| 2009 | NJ | 2130 | 3.30 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 97.6% |
| 2009 | DE | 2120 | 3.55 | Top 25% | Hispanic | 100.0% |
| 2009 | GA | 2110 | 3.90 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 99.7% |
| 2009 | MS | 2100 | 3.72 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 97.8% |
| 2009 | MA | 2090 | 3.60 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 99.5% |
| 2009 | (Private) | 2080 | 3.40 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 96.6% |
| 2009 | NJ | 1990 | 3.40 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 80.1% |
| 2009 | MA | 1980 | 3.76 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 89.4% |
| 2009 | (Private) | 1960 | 3.88 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 94.6% |
| 2009 | CA | 1950 | 3.10 | Top 40% | Caucasian | 99.2% |
| 2009 | GA | 1950 | 3.95 | Top 1% | Caucasian | 94.8% |
| 2009 | NJ | 1950 | 3.60 | Top 40% | Caucasian | 99.3% |
| 2009 | NC | 1930 | 3.04 | Top 20% | Hispanic | 100.0% |
| 2009 | MA | 1900 | 3.79 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 93.7% |
| 2009 | PA | 1880 | 3.70 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 88.7% |
| 2009 | RI | 1850 | 3.50 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 69.0% |
| 2009 | GA | 1820 | 3.40 | Bottom 50% | African-American | 100.0% |
| 2009 | NJ | 1790 | 4.00 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 55.0% |
| 2009 | NC | 1780 | 2.90 | Top 40% | South Asian | 38.6% |
| 2009 | SC | 1690 | 3.61 | Top 20% | African-American | 99.9% |
| 2009 | NJ | 28 | 3.50 | Unknown | Caucasian | 69.8% |
| 2009 | (Private) | 28 | 3.90 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 78.9% |
| 2008 | TN | 2300 | 3.95 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 100.0% |
| 2008 | NJ | 2180 | 3.70 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 99.3% |
| 2008 | NC | 2150 | 3.40 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 99.3% |
| 2008 | MA | 2120 | 3.75 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 99.5% |
| 2008 | NC | 2100 | 3.60 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 99.3% |
| 2008 | PA | 2100 | 3.90 | Unknown | Caucasian | 99.7% |
| 2008 | NJ | 2050 | 3.70 | Top 40% | Caucasian | 99.9% |
| 2008 | NC | 2040 | 3.50 | Unknown | Caucasian | 95.8% |
| 2008 | FL | 1970 | 3.65 | Unknown | Caucasian | 93.6% |
| 2008 | OH | 1960 | 3.95 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 92.9% |
| 2008 | MD | 1950 | 3.70 | Unknown | Hispanic | 100.0% |
| 2008 | XX | 1920 | 3.80 | Unknown | East Asian | 92.4% |
| 2007 | NC | 2140 | 3.96 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 99.5% |
| 2007 | FL | 2080 | 3.60 | Top 10% | Hispanic | 100.0% |
|
|
| 2010 | (Private) | 1520 | 2.67 | Bottom 40% | African-American | 99.1% |
| 2010 | NY | 21 | 3.20 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 0.1% |
| 2009 | TX | 2030 | 3.50 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 97.2% |
| 2009 | NC | 1990 | 3.02 | Unknown | Caucasian | 60.6% |
| 2009 | MD | 1910 | 3.00 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 30.1% |
| 2009 | (Private) | 1880 | 3.42 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 71.9% |
| 2009 | NC | 1860 | 2.76 | Unknown | Caucasian | 7.0% |
| 2009 | FL | 1780 | 3.70 | Unknown | Caucasian | 50.7% |
| 2009 | CT | 1650 | 3.40 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 2.2% |
| 2009 | OH | 26 | 3.00 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 5.9% |
| 2008 | NC | 1730 | 3.70 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 20.4% |
| |
