Cornell University Applications and Decisions
Below is a list of applicants who have demonstrated interest in Cornell University. Our best formula
for this college is based on
508 members who were accepted or rejected. The formula
has a college admissions prediction accuracy of
75%?.
Because not all members have filled out the most recent version of our survey, some predictions are made based on
less-accurate models. Those are noted with an asterisk (*) next to their prediction.
This is a very popular school, so we're only showing you profiles that have received an admissions decision. If you
want to see all applicants to this school,
click here (caution: the page will take awhile to load).
|
| 2012 | NY | 2350 | 3.70 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 70.1% |
| 2010 | CA | 2380 | 3.77 | Class Not Ranked | East Asian | 49.5% |
| 2010 | NJ | 2270 | 3.85 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 62.2% |
| 2010 | PA | 2260 | 3.70 | Top 15% | Caucasian | 29.6% |
| 2010 | WA | 2250 | 3.88 | Top 10% | East Asian | 50.1% |
| 2010 | NJ | 2250 | 3.76 | Top 10% | East Asian | 39.1% |
| 2010 | PA | 2240 | 3.80 | Top 2% | Caucasian | 51.5% |
| 2010 | PA | 2220 | 4.00 | Top 1% | South Asian | 67.9% |
| 2010 | IN | 2200 | 3.96 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 45.0% |
| 2010 | XX | 2200 | 4.00 | Class Not Ranked | South Asian | 48.7% |
| 2010 | (Private) | 2190 | 4.00 | Top 1% | Caucasian | 64.6% |
| 2010 | PA | 2180 | 4.00 | Top 5% | None Indicated | 58.8% |
| 2010 | XX | 2120 | 3.90 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 47.6% |
| 2010 | FL | 2090 | 3.52 | Top 20% | Hispanic | 43.2% |
| 2010 | VA | 2070 | 3.96 | Valedictorian | Caucasian | 47.8% |
| 2010 | NY | 2060 | 3.90 | Top 4% | Caucasian | 69.3% |
| 2010 | DE | 2000 | 3.95 | Top 5% | None Indicated | 55.4% |
| 2010 | CA | 1920 | 3.76 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 11.2% |
| 2010 | CT | 1860 | 4.00 | Top 2% | East Asian | 25.5% |
| 2010 | NY | 34 | 4.00 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 82.5% |
| 2010 | (Private) | 34 | 3.95 | Top 1% | None Indicated | 68.7% |
| 2010 | (Private) | 32 | 4.00 | Top 10% | None Indicated | 70.8% |
| 2009 | NJ | 2310 | 3.80 | Top 5% | East Asian | 56.2% |
| 2009 | XX | 2290 | 4.00 | Salutatorian | East Asian | 75.7% |
| 2009 | SC | 2280 | 4.00 | Top 1% | Caucasian | 74.0% |
| 2009 | IL | 2250 | 3.93 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 60.8% |
| 2009 | (Private) | 2220 | 4.00 | Valedictorian | Caucasian | 88.6% |
| 2009 | NJ | 2220 | 3.38 | Top 20% | Hispanic | 46.0% |
| 2009 | VA | 2190 | 3.92 | Unknown | Caucasian | 58.9% |
| 2009 | NJ | 2180 | 3.74 | Top 10% | South Asian | 29.8% |
| 2009 | VA | 2180 | 4.00 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 58.8% |
| 2009 | NY | 2170 | 3.68 | Top 5% | South Asian | 53.5% |
| 2009 | CA | 2170 | 4.00 | Top 2% | East Asian | 61.0% |
| 2009 | PA | 2160 | 3.90 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 47.1% |
| 2009 | NY | 2150 | 3.70 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 63.6% |
| 2009 | ME | 2130 | 4.00 | Salutatorian | Caucasian | 58.8% |
| 2009 | NY | 2120 | 3.83 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 62.4% |
| 2009 | CT | 2120 | 3.70 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 17.5% |
| 2009 | NJ | 2090 | 3.65 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 20.1% |
| 2009 | TX | 2010 | 3.90 | Top 1% | Caucasian | 55.7% |
| 2009 | CA | 1980 | 3.71 | Top 20% | Hispanic | 47.1% |
| 2009 | NJ | 1920 | 3.80 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 19.6% |
| 2009 | CA | 1910 | 3.40 | Top 30% | African-American | 16.6% |
| 2009 | IN | 1890 | 3.98 | Salutatorian | East Asian | 42.3% |
| 2009 | PA | 1870 | 4.00 | Salutatorian | East Asian | 28.3% |
| 2009 | NJ | 1750 | 3.90 | Top 5% | Hispanic | 54.9% |
| 2009 | NY | 1510 | 3.67 | Top 10% | South Asian | 58.1% |
| 2009 | MD | 34 | 3.95 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 64.2% |
| 2009 | (Private) | 33 | 3.72 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 24.3% |
| 2009 | KS | 32 | 4.00 | Valedictorian | East Asian | 58.8% |
| 2009 | NY | 32 | 4.00 | Top 1% | Caucasian | 79.2% |
| 2009 | NY | 32 | 3.82 | Top 20% | African-American | 88.7% |
| 2008 | (Private) | 2310 | 4.00 | Top 1% | Caucasian | 90.2% |
| 2008 | NJ | 2230 | 3.92 | Salutatorian | South Asian | 63.3% |
| 2008 | CA | 2210 | 3.71 | Top 20% | East Asian | 21.1% |
| 2008 | NY | 2180 | 3.80 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 65.6% |
| 2008 | NY | 2130 | 4.00 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 70.8% |
| 2008 | MA | 2100 | 3.50 | Unknown | None Indicated | 8.4% |
| 2008 | CA | 1980 | 3.67 | Valedictorian | Caucasian | 16.7% |
| 2008 | MD | 1950 | 3.70 | Unknown | Hispanic | 48.7% |
| 2008 | PA | 1950 | 3.30 | Top 30% | African-American | 9.3% |
| 2008 | CA | 1870 | 3.70 | Unknown | Hispanic | 60.0% |
| 2008 | NY | 1860 | 3.72 | Top 15% | Caucasian | 15.1% |
| 2008 | WI | 33 | 4.00 | Top 1% | Caucasian | 64.6% |
| 2008 | NY | 33 | 4.00 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 71.8% |
| 2007 | CO | 2330 | 3.99 | Top 1% | East Asian | 78.6% |
| 2007 | NJ | 2320 | 3.91 | Top 10% | East Asian | 61.2% |
| 2007 | NY | 2290 | 3.88 | Top 5% | East Asian | 81.4% |
| 2007 | TX | 2250 | 4.00 | Salutatorian | Other | 72.0% |
| 2007 | (Private) | 2180 | 4.00 | Valedictorian | East Asian | 64.7% |
| 2007 | NJ | 2170 | 3.95 | Top 5% | None Indicated | 52.8% |
| 2007 | MN | 33 | 3.87 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 41.8% |
| 2006 | AK | 2330 | 4.00 | Valedictorian | East Asian | 79.3% |
| 2006 | CA | 2300 | 3.85 | Top 5% | East Asian | 59.7% |
| 2006 | FL | 2250 | 3.83 | Top 10% | East Asian | 45.5% |
| 2006 | NY | 2210 | 3.70 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 60.4% |
| 2006 | MA | 2180 | 3.94 | Class Not Ranked | East Asian | 41.0% |
| 2006 | IL | 2040 | 3.90 | Top 2% | Caucasian | 54.5% |
| 2003 | NY | 2270 | 3.97 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 81.3% |
| 2002 | FL | 2100 | 3.76 | Top 1% | Hispanic | 83.3% |
| 2000 | NY | 1430 | 3.80 | Unknown | South Asian | 49.3% |
| 1999 | Ot | 31 | 3.50 | Unknown | Caucasian | 7.3% |
|
| 2012 | CA | 2400 | 4.00 | Valedictorian | Middle-Eastern | 84.3% |
| 2010 | TX | 2380 | 3.99 | Valedictorian | African-American | 98.2% |
| 2010 | XX | 2370 | 3.90 | Top 1% | South Asian | 75.3% |
| 2010 | NY | 2320 | 4.00 | Valedictorian | Hispanic | 99.1% |
| 2010 | NJ | 2310 | 3.90 | Class Not Ranked | African-American | 92.1% |
| 2010 | TX | 2300 | 3.94 | Top 1% | East Asian | 71.6% |
| 2010 | XX | 2290 | 3.98 | Class Not Ranked | East Asian | 63.8% |
| 2010 | KY | 2290 | 3.82 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 55.5% |
| 2010 | NY | 2280 | 3.90 | Top 5% | East Asian | 85.8% |
| 2010 | FL | 2260 | 3.97 | Valedictorian | Caucasian | 83.6% |
| 2010 | (Private) | 2250 | 3.72 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 41.6% |
| 2010 | OH | 2210 | 3.98 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 55.0% |
| 2010 | NJ | 2200 | 3.75 | Top 10% | African-American | 83.3% |
| 2010 | PA | 2150 | 3.70 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 24.0% |
| 2010 | NJ | 2150 | 3.80 | Unknown | Hispanic | 78.7% |
| 2010 | CA | 2130 | 3.86 | Top 20% | Native American | 90.1% |
| 2010 | CO | 2130 | 3.95 | Top 4% | Other | 49.3% |
| 2010 | FL | 2100 | 3.75 | Top 2% | Hispanic | 82.0% |
| 2010 | NY | 2050 | 3.61 | Class Not Ranked | African-American | 75.6% |
| 2010 | NY | 2000 | 4.00 | Top 5% | African-American | 94.5% |
| 2010 | NY | 1930 | 3.40 | Class Not Ranked | African-American | 62.6% |
| 2010 | FL | 1890 | 4.00 | Top 10% | Hispanic | 90.0% |
| 2010 | NY | 1880 | 4.00 | Salutatorian | African-American | 92.7% |
| 2010 | TX | 1870 | 3.96 | Valedictorian | African-American | 77.9% |
| 2010 | VA | 1830 | 3.95 | Top 4% | African-American | 69.7% |
| 2010 | NJ | 1770 | 4.00 | Top 2% | Hispanic | 69.4% |
| 2010 | FL | 1710 | 3.60 | Top 10% | African-American | 20.5% |
| 2010 | CT | 34 | 3.67 | Top 3% | Caucasian | 41.3% |
| 2010 | NY | 34 | 3.80 | Unknown | Caucasian | 63.7% |
| 2010 | NY | 33 | 4.00 | Valedictorian | Caucasian | 84.3% |
| 2010 | (Private) | 29 | 4.00 | Top 5% | African-American | 82.6% |
| 2009 | FL | 2400 | 4.00 | Valedictorian | Caucasian | 84.3% |
| 2009 | MA | 2390 | 4.00 | Valedictorian | East Asian | 83.7% |
| 2009 | MA | 2390 | 3.99 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 89.2% |
| 2009 | FL | 2380 | 3.92 | Top 5% | None Indicated | 85.7% |
| 2009 | PA | 2380 | 4.00 | Top 1% | Caucasian | 82.2% |
| 2009 | VA | 2370 | 3.91 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 61.2% |
| 2009 | PA | 2360 | 3.35 | Unknown | Caucasian | 15.9% |
| 2009 | SC | 2360 | 4.00 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 88.0% |
| 2009 | MA | 2350 | 3.95 | Class Not Ranked | East Asian | 62.3% |
| 2009 | CA | 2350 | 4.00 | Top 1% | None Indicated | 80.0% |
| 2009 | NY | 2330 | 4.00 | Top 1% | East Asian | 91.1% |
| 2009 | NY | 2330 | 3.70 | Unknown | Caucasian | 62.6% |
| 2009 | NH | 2330 | 4.00 | Valedictorian | Caucasian | 79.3% |
| 2009 | RI | 2330 | 3.95 | Top 5% | East Asian | 71.3% |
| 2009 | MA | 2330 | 3.95 | Top 1% | Caucasian | 75.2% |
| 2009 | WA | 2320 | 4.00 | Valedictorian | Caucasian | 78.3% |
| 2009 | MA | 2320 | 3.97 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 71.6% |
| 2009 | CA | 2320 | 4.00 | Top 1% | Caucasian | 77.5% |
| 2009 | TN | 2320 | 4.00 | Valedictorian | East Asian | 78.3% |
| 2009 | RI | 2310 | 4.00 | Valedictorian | Other | 77.6% |
| 2009 | TX | 2310 | 3.80 | Top 5% | East Asian | 56.2% |
| 2009 | NY | 2310 | 3.99 | Valedictorian | East Asian | 90.3% |
| 2009 | NY | 2310 | 3.90 | Salutatorian | Caucasian | 87.0% |
| 2009 | NY | 2300 | 3.84 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 70.8% |
| 2009 | (Private) | 2290 | 3.88 | Class Not Ranked | African-American | 90.7% |
| 2009 | CA | 2290 | 3.98 | Valedictorian | East Asian | 74.3% |
| 2009 | CA | 2290 | 3.93 | Top 5% | East Asian | 65.2% |
| 2009 | OH | 2280 | 3.60 | Top 20% | African-American | 72.1% |
| 2009 | NY | 2280 | 4.00 | Salutatorian | East Asian | 89.3% |
| 2009 | WY | 2270 | 4.00 | Top 1% | Caucasian | 73.1% |
| 2009 | NY | 2270 | 3.91 | Top 2% | East Asian | 83.8% |
| 2009 | NY | 2270 | 3.84 | Class Not Ranked | South Asian | 67.7% |
| 2009 | NJ | 2260 | 4.00 | Valedictorian | Caucasian | 73.5% |
| 2009 | IL | 2260 | 4.00 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 56.8% |
| 2009 | OR | 2260 | 4.00 | Valedictorian | Other | 85.1% |
| 2009 | PA | 2260 | 4.00 | Top 1% | East Asian | 71.9% |
| 2009 | NY | 2250 | 3.95 | Top 5% | African-American | 98.0% |
| 2009 | CA | 2250 | 4.00 | Salutatorian | Caucasian | 72.0% |
| 2009 | XX | 2250 | 3.88 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 50.1% |
| 2009 | RI | 2250 | 3.90 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 51.9% |
| 2009 | NJ | 2240 | 4.00 | Valedictorian | Caucasian | 80.0% |
| 2009 | CA | 2240 | 3.97 | Top 1% | East Asian | 67.7% |
| 2009 | CA | 2240 | 3.74 | Top 10% | African-American | 85.5% |
| 2009 | (Private) | 2240 | 3.75 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 56.4% |
| 2009 | NJ | 2230 | 3.93 | Class Not Ranked | South Asian | 45.9% |
| 2009 | CA | 2220 | 3.76 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 35.1% |
| 2009 | OH | 2220 | 3.85 | Top 5% | Hispanic | 91.1% |
| 2009 | MN | 2220 | 3.99 | Top 5% | South Asian | 62.5% |
| 2009 | FL | 2210 | 4.00 | Valedictorian | Caucasian | 68.0% |
| 2009 | NY | 2210 | 3.81 | Top 1% | Caucasian | 73.7% |
| 2009 | MD | 2210 | 4.00 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 62.4% |
| 2009 | XX | 2200 | 3.87 | Top 20% | East Asian | 31.4% |
| 2009 | CA | 2200 | 3.75 | Top 5% | East Asian | 38.2% |
| 2009 | CA | 2190 | 3.92 | Top 5% | South Asian | 52.6% |
| 2009 | MD | 2190 | 4.00 | Top 1% | South Asian | 64.6% |
| 2009 | AR | 2180 | 4.00 | Top 10% | Hispanic | 92.0% |
| 2009 | CA | 2180 | 3.95 | Top 10% | East Asian | 48.1% |
| 2009 | NJ | 2170 | 4.00 | Top 10% | African-American | 91.6% |
| 2009 | CA | 2170 | 4.00 | Salutatorian | East Asian | 63.3% |
| 2009 | NY | 2160 | 4.00 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 78.3% |
| 2009 | (Private) | 2130 | 4.00 | Valedictorian | Caucasian | 75.2% |
| 2009 | FL | 2120 | 4.00 | Valedictorian | Caucasian | 73.5% |
| 2009 | PA | 2120 | 3.46 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 16.2% |
| 2009 | MA | 2110 | 3.87 | Top 1% | African-American | 88.7% |
| 2009 | CT | 2110 | 3.95 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 45.5% |
| 2009 | (Private) | 2080 | 3.90 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 53.8% |
| 2009 | NY | 2080 | 3.95 | Salutatorian | Caucasian | 72.1% |
| 2009 | OH | 2070 | 3.75 | Class Not Ranked | African-American | 67.3% |
| 2009 | PA | 2070 | 4.00 | Valedictorian | Caucasian | 51.5% |
| 2009 | PA | 2050 | 4.00 | Salutatorian | Other | 73.5% |
| 2009 | NY | 2050 | 3.80 | Top 1% | Caucasian | 64.4% |
| 2009 | FL | 2050 | 3.90 | Salutatorian | African-American | 87.2% |
| 2009 | CA | 2050 | 3.92 | Top 5% | South Asian | 35.7% |
| 2009 | CA | 2040 | 3.80 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 13.9% |
| 2009 | XX | 2030 | 3.90 | Class Not Ranked | East Asian | 22.3% |
| 2009 | (Private) | 2030 | 3.65 | Top 5% | Hispanic | 65.9% |
| 2009 | PA | 2030 | 4.00 | Salutatorian | Hispanic | 90.1% |
| 2009 | TX | 2010 | 3.61 | Top 10% | Native American | 67.9% |
| 2009 | NY | 2010 | 3.75 | Top 1% | Hispanic | 89.6% |
| 2009 | MD | 2000 | 4.00 | Valedictorian | African-American | 88.7% |
| 2009 | NJ | 2000 | 3.90 | Top 5% | East Asian | 28.9% |
| 2009 | MI | 1950 | 3.20 | Class Not Ranked | African-American | 16.6% |
| 2009 | TX | 1940 | 3.70 | Top 10% | African-American | 53.8% |
| 2009 | NY | 1920 | 3.80 | Unknown | East Asian | 24.3% |
| 2009 | NJ | 1920 | 4.00 | Top 5% | Hispanic | 80.4% |
| 2009 | NY | 1880 | 3.91 | Salutatorian | Hispanic | 89.7% |
| 2009 | NY | 1810 | 3.85 | Top 1% | Hispanic | 82.3% |
| 2009 | IL | 1710 | 3.98 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 12.3% |
| 2009 | PA | 31 | 4.00 | Salutatorian | Caucasian | 51.5% |
| 2009 | NY | 35 | 4.00 | Valedictorian | Caucasian | 96.0% |
| 2009 | OK | 34 | 3.75 | Top 20% | Native American | 80.8% |
| 2009 | CA | 34 | 3.97 | Top 1% | Caucasian | 70.2% |
| 2009 | (Private) | 34 | 4.00 | Salutatorian | Caucasian | 85.5% |
| 2009 | NJ | 32 | 3.75 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 30.6% |
| 2009 | WI | 32 | 3.87 | Top 10% | African-American | 84.7% |
| 2009 | CA | 31 | 3.80 | Top 10% | Middle-Eastern | 23.5% |
| 2009 | CA | 30 | 3.90 | Class Not Ranked | Hispanic | 72.8% |
| 2008 | NJ | 2400 | 4.00 | Valedictorian | Caucasian | 84.3% |
| 2008 | MD | 2390 | 4.00 | Valedictorian | East Asian | 83.7% |
| 2008 | MD | 2380 | 4.00 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 79.1% |
| 2008 | IN | 2350 | 3.95 | Top 1% | East Asian | 76.8% |
| 2008 | CA | 2350 | 3.96 | Class Not Ranked | East Asian | 63.1% |
| 2008 | TN | 2340 | 4.00 | Top 1% | East Asian | 79.2% |
| 2008 | PA | 2340 | 4.00 | Valedictorian | East Asian | 80.0% |
| 2008 | MD | 2340 | 4.00 | Top 5% | East Asian | 75.8% |
| 2008 | (Private) | 2340 | 4.00 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 75.8% |
| 2008 | CA | 2340 | 4.00 | Valedictorian | South Asian | 80.0% |
| 2008 | XX | 2320 | 3.90 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 68.3% |
| 2008 | NY | 2320 | 3.44 | Class Not Ranked | None Indicated | 40.0% |
| 2008 | (Private) | 2320 | 3.85 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 61.8% |
| 2008 | MA | 2310 | 4.00 | Valedictorian | Caucasian | 77.6% |
| 2008 | OH | 2290 | 4.00 | Valedictorian | South Asian | 75.7% |
| 2008 | NY | 2290 | 4.00 | Valedictorian | None Indicated | 89.7% |
| 2008 | IN | 2280 | 3.98 | Top 1% | East Asian | 72.5% |
| 2008 | VA | 2280 | 4.00 | Salutatorian | None Indicated | 74.9% |
| 2008 | FL | 2270 | 3.94 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 64.1% |
| 2008 | NY | 2270 | 3.91 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 81.7% |
| 2008 | LA | 2270 | 3.90 | Salutatorian | East Asian | 66.3% |
| 2008 | CA | 2270 | 3.65 | Class Not Ranked | East Asian | 27.0% |
| 2008 | OH | 2260 | 4.00 | Salutatorian | Caucasian | 80.0% |
| 2008 | LA | 2250 | 3.95 | Valedictorian | Caucasian | 68.1% |
| 2008 | NY | 2240 | 3.92 | Top 1% | Caucasian | 83.0% |
| 2008 | NY | 2240 | 3.95 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 77.7% |
| 2008 | NV | 2230 | 4.00 | Valedictorian | South Asian | 80.0% |
| 2008 | MA | 2230 | 3.92 | Top 1% | Caucasian | 62.2% |
| 2008 | NY | 2220 | 3.98 | Top 5% | None Indicated | 81.8% |
| 2008 | WI | 2210 | 3.98 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 66.7% |
| 2008 | NY | 2190 | 4.00 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 80.7% |
| 2008 | AL | 2180 | 4.00 | Valedictorian | South Asian | 65.7% |
| 2008 | FL | 2160 | 3.85 | Unknown | Middle-Eastern | 31.0% |
| 2008 | TN | 2140 | 4.00 | Salutatorian | African-American | 95.2% |
| 2008 | NY | 2130 | 3.89 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 71.0% |
| 2008 | FL | 2130 | 3.80 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 20.1% |
| 2008 | (Private) | 2120 | 3.94 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 35.1% |
| 2008 | NY | 2120 | 4.00 | Valedictorian | East Asian | 79.3% |
| 2008 | FL | 2080 | 3.97 | Top 1% | Middle-Eastern | 48.6% |
| 2008 | NY | 2060 | 3.90 | Unknown | Hispanic | 90.6% |
| 2008 | MD | 2050 | 3.19 | Class Not Ranked | Middle-Eastern | 2.2% |
| 2008 | MN | 2040 | 3.85 | Top 10% | African-American | 76.8% |
| 2008 | FL | 2030 | 3.95 | Top 5% | None Indicated | 36.2% |
| 2008 | PA | 2010 | 3.94 | Salutatorian | African-American | 86.7% |
| 2008 | IL | 1990 | 3.95 | Top 1% | African-American | 85.4% |
| 2008 | DC | 1580 | 3.70 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 54.4% |
| 2008 | NY | 1530 | 3.64 | Unknown | None Indicated | 52.9% |
| 2008 | MN | 1430 | 3.93 | Top 5% | African-American | 94.5% |
| 2008 | NY | 35 | 4.00 | Valedictorian | Caucasian | 91.8% |
| 2008 | CA | 34 | 4.00 | Class Not Ranked | None Indicated | 56.8% |
| 2008 | NV | 32 | 3.98 | Salutatorian | African-American | 93.2% |
| 2007 | (Private) | 2400 | 3.70 | Unknown | Caucasian | 70.2% |
| 2007 | NV | 2390 | 4.00 | Salutatorian | Caucasian | 83.7% |
| 2007 | NY | 2350 | 3.70 | Unknown | None Indicated | 64.7% |
| 2007 | XX | 2270 | 3.98 | Unknown | East Asian | 55.7% |
| 2007 | MA | 2250 | 3.80 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 42.7% |
| 2007 | CO | 2240 | 4.00 | Unknown | Caucasian | 65.5% |
| 2007 | XX | 2240 | 4.00 | Top 5% | African-American | 95.2% |
| 2007 | NJ | 2220 | 3.88 | Top 10% | South Asian | 46.4% |
| 2007 | MO | 2180 | 3.70 | Top 30% | Caucasian | 11.9% |
| 2007 | CA | 2160 | 3.80 | Unknown | East Asian | 27.2% |
| 2007 | MI | 2160 | 4.00 | Valedictorian | Caucasian | 62.3% |
| 2007 | CA | 34 | 4.00 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 56.8% |
| 2007 | FL | 28 | 3.70 | Top 20% | Hispanic | 35.5% |
| 2007 | MN | 27 | 3.94 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 13.7% |
| 2006 | CA | 2340 | 3.80 | Top 10% | East Asian | 53.7% |
| 2006 | CA | 2230 | 4.00 | Top 5% | East Asian | 64.4% |
| 2006 | NY | 2200 | 3.72 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 60.8% |
| 2006 | IL | 2120 | 3.90 | Top 5% | Indian | 50.8% |
| 2006 | (Private) | 2000 | 3.70 | Top 5% | East Asian | 16.2% |
| 2006 | NJ | 2000 | 3.88 | Top 5% | Hispanic | 79.6% |
| 2005 | WY | 2400 | 4.00 | Valedictorian | Native American | 98.2% |
| 2003 | CA | 2360 | 4.00 | Class Not Ranked | East Asian | 67.8% |
| 2003 | NJ | 2220 | 3.90 | Top 10% | South Asian | 48.2% |
| 2003 | CA | 2040 | 3.78 | Top 5% | None Indicated | 24.0% |
| 2002 | MI | 2290 | 4.00 | Valedictorian | Caucasian | 75.7% |
| 2002 | KS | 2290 | 3.50 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 18.8% |
| 2002 | MI | 2280 | 4.00 | Valedictorian | Caucasian | 74.9% |
| 2002 | CA | 1590 | 4.00 | Top 5% | East Asian | 79.6% |
| 2002 | IL | 34 | 3.86 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 56.3% |
| 2000 | NY | 2360 | 4.00 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 90.7% |
| 2000 | CA | 2270 | 3.90 | Top 1% | East Asian | 65.2% |
|
|
| 2012 | NJ | 2400 | 4.00 | Top 10% | Middle-Eastern | 76.6% |
| 2010 | (Private) | 2400 | 4.00 | Unknown | Caucasian | 93.8% |
| 2010 | (Private) | 2300 | 3.70 | Top 15% | East Asian | 34.0% |
| 2010 | MD | 2260 | 3.61 | Class Not Ranked | Other | 23.1% |
| 2010 | PA | 2220 | 3.80 | Top 10% | Middle-Eastern | 39.2% |
| 2010 | NJ | 2220 | 3.80 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 45.2% |
| 2010 | MD | 2200 | 3.95 | Class Not Ranked | Other | 62.6% |
| 2010 | NJ | 2200 | 4.00 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 48.7% |
| 2010 | NY | 2190 | 3.70 | Class Not Ranked | East Asian | 45.5% |
| 2010 | PA | 2190 | 3.50 | Top 15% | Caucasian | 12.5% |
| 2010 | NJ | 2180 | 3.61 | Class Not Ranked | South Asian | 17.0% |
| 2010 | (Private) | 2180 | 3.72 | Class Not Ranked | East Asian | 23.5% |
| 2010 | XX | 2150 | 3.98 | Top 5% | Other | 53.4% |
| 2010 | PA | 2140 | 4.00 | Valedictorian | Caucasian | 59.9% |
| 2010 | XX | 2120 | 3.90 | Top 5% | East Asian | 42.3% |
| 2010 | NC | 2120 | 3.61 | Top 4% | Caucasian | 35.9% |
| 2010 | NJ | 2090 | 3.88 | Top 3% | Caucasian | 39.4% |
| 2010 | XX | 2090 | 4.00 | Top 1% | East Asian | 52.8% |
| 2010 | XX | 2080 | 3.60 | Class Not Ranked | East Asian | 10.7% |
| 2010 | NY | 2080 | 3.70 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 32.6% |
| 2010 | NY | 2080 | 3.68 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 36.6% |
| 2010 | PA | 2070 | 3.60 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 10.3% |
| 2010 | NY | 2070 | 3.60 | Class Not Ranked | East Asian | 24.2% |
| 2010 | NJ | 2070 | 3.68 | Top 15% | Caucasian | 13.3% |
| 2010 | NY | 2040 | 4.00 | Top 15% | Caucasian | 54.9% |
| 2010 | XX | 2000 | 3.47 | Top 30% | East Asian | 2.3% |
| 2010 | XX | 1990 | 3.80 | Top 5% | East Asian | 20.9% |
| 2010 | NY | 1960 | 3.00 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 4.1% |
| 2010 | PA | 1940 | 3.66 | Top 2% | Hispanic | 59.9% |
| 2010 | UT | 1920 | 3.86 | Top 3% | Caucasian | 20.6% |
| 2010 | ME | 1880 | 3.70 | Top 15% | Caucasian | 12.2% |
| 2010 | NY | 1860 | 3.90 | Top 2% | Caucasian | 65.0% |
| 2010 | PA | 1730 | 2.81 | Bottom 50% | Caucasian | 0.0% |
| 2010 | NJ | 1720 | 3.76 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 6.1% |
| 2010 | (Private) | 1650 | 3.82 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 4.0% |
| 2010 | NY | 27 | 3.90 | Top 10% | None Indicated | 27.7% |
| 2009 | FL | 2380 | 3.95 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 75.9% |
| 2009 | RI | 2380 | 3.82 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 60.2% |
| 2009 | XX | 2350 | 3.80 | Top 5% | East Asian | 60.9% |
| 2009 | NH | 2350 | 3.91 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 70.1% |
| 2009 | NJ | 2350 | 3.81 | Top 1% | Caucasian | 66.3% |
| 2009 | PA | 2340 | 3.36 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 12.1% |
| 2009 | VA | 2340 | 3.99 | Unknown | Caucasian | 64.7% |
| 2009 | PA | 2330 | 3.82 | Class Not Ranked | East Asian | 48.3% |
| 2009 | OH | 2330 | 3.81 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 47.3% |
| 2009 | XX | 2320 | 4.00 | Class Not Ranked | East Asian | 63.2% |
| 2009 | (Private) | 2310 | 3.99 | Salutatorian | East Asian | 76.9% |
| 2009 | XX | 2300 | 3.70 | Class Not Ranked | East Asian | 34.0% |
| 2009 | KY | 2300 | 3.66 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 42.2% |
| 2009 | NY | 2290 | 3.64 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 58.3% |
| 2009 | CA | 2290 | 3.90 | Top 5% | East Asian | 62.7% |
| 2009 | NJ | 2290 | 4.00 | Valedictorian | East Asian | 75.7% |
| 2009 | MI | 2280 | 3.95 | Top 1% | Caucasian | 70.2% |
| 2009 | XX | 2280 | 3.82 | Top 1% | South Asian | 59.3% |
| 2009 | TN | 2270 | 3.97 | Top 5% | East Asian | 73.7% |
| 2009 | (Private) | 2270 | 4.00 | Valedictorian | Other | 74.1% |
| 2009 | NY | 2270 | 3.92 | Top 2% | Caucasian | 84.3% |
| 2009 | FL | 2270 | 3.76 | Top 1% | East Asian | 52.7% |
| 2009 | MA | 2270 | 4.00 | Salutatorian | Caucasian | 74.1% |
| 2009 | (Private) | 2270 | 3.88 | Class Not Ranked | Hispanic | 95.0% |
| 2009 | (Private) | 2260 | 3.58 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 21.2% |
| 2009 | FL | 2250 | 3.92 | Top 5% | East Asian | 59.9% |
| 2009 | CA | 2250 | 3.65 | Top 10% | Other | 30.0% |
| 2009 | (Private) | 2250 | 3.83 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 45.5% |
| 2009 | WA | 2240 | 3.99 | Top 1% | Caucasian | 71.8% |
| 2009 | NJ | 2240 | 3.73 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 41.4% |
| 2009 | CT | 2240 | 3.87 | Salutatorian | Caucasian | 60.3% |
| 2009 | PA | 2240 | 3.89 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 56.1% |
| 2009 | NE | 2240 | 4.00 | Class Not Ranked | East Asian | 53.9% |
| 2009 | PA | 2230 | 3.75 | Top 10% | South Asian | 35.8% |
| 2009 | IL | 2220 | 3.75 | Top 5% | East Asian | 55.3% |
| 2009 | MD | 2220 | 3.75 | Top 5% | None Indicated | 40.7% |
| 2009 | CA | 2220 | 3.73 | Top 20% | East Asian | 23.2% |
| 2009 | PA | 2220 | 3.72 | Top 10% | South Asian | 32.4% |
| 2009 | FL | 2210 | 3.70 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 24.9% |
| 2009 | MA | 2210 | 3.68 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 28.3% |
| 2009 | OH | 2200 | 3.91 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 63.6% |
| 2009 | TX | 2200 | 3.30 | Top 10% | Other | 8.3% |
| 2009 | (Private) | 2200 | 3.30 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 6.6% |
| 2009 | (Private) | 2200 | 3.90 | Class Not Ranked | East Asian | 39.6% |
| 2009 | CA | 2190 | 3.60 | Top 10% | East Asian | 35.6% |
| 2009 | NJ | 2190 | 3.87 | Top 10% | None Indicated | 41.8% |
| 2009 | CA | 2190 | 3.76 | Class Not Ranked | East Asian | 27.2% |
| 2009 | CT | 2190 | 3.92 | Top 5% | South Asian | 52.6% |
| 2009 | SC | 2190 | 3.86 | Top 5% | South Asian | 47.1% |
| 2009 | MA | 2180 | 3.05 | Class Not Ranked | None Indicated | 5.3% |
| 2009 | PA | 2180 | 3.34 | Top 30% | None Indicated | 3.4% |
| 2009 | WA | 2180 | 4.00 | Top 1% | East Asian | 63.6% |
| 2009 | CA | 2170 | 3.49 | Top 35% | None Indicated | 4.4% |
| 2009 | CA | 2170 | 3.30 | Top 20% | Middle-Eastern | 4.6% |
| 2009 | NH | 2170 | 3.97 | Top 1% | East Asian | 59.5% |
| 2009 | NY | 2170 | 4.00 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 79.1% |
| 2009 | PA | 2160 | 3.80 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 32.4% |
| 2009 | WA | 2150 | 3.80 | Top 10% | East Asian | 60.9% |
| 2009 | IL | 2150 | 3.58 | Top 5% | East Asian | 23.9% |
| 2009 | WA | 2150 | 3.77 | Top 10% | East Asian | 29.1% |
| 2009 | CT | 2150 | 3.60 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 14.5% |
| 2009 | FL | 2140 | 3.60 | Top 30% | Caucasian | 13.9% |
| 2009 | NY | 2140 | 3.54 | Top 20% | Other | 21.9% |
| 2009 | CO | 2130 | 3.74 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 48.2% |
| 2009 | WI | 2130 | 4.00 | Top 1% | East Asian | 72.5% |
| 2009 | CT | 2130 | 3.74 | Top 10% | East Asian | 24.9% |
| 2009 | OH | 2120 | 4.00 | Top 1% | Caucasian | 72.5% |
| 2009 | CA | 2120 | 3.50 | Unknown | South Asian | 9.2% |
| 2009 | VA | 2120 | 3.84 | Top 10% | East Asian | 31.4% |
| 2009 | CA | 2120 | 3.77 | Class Not Ranked | Other | 21.6% |
| 2009 | TX | 2110 | 3.73 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 38.2% |
| 2009 | NY | 2110 | 3.96 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 67.7% |
| 2009 | NY | 2110 | 3.52 | Unknown | African-American | 74.9% |
| 2009 | FL | 2110 | 3.79 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 26.4% |
| 2009 | NY | 2110 | 3.80 | Class Not Ranked | East Asian | 44.9% |
| 2009 | CA | 2110 | 3.80 | Top 20% | South Asian | 18.5% |
| 2009 | NY | 2110 | 3.60 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 33.2% |
| 2009 | XX | 2100 | 3.75 | Top 1% | South Asian | 31.7% |
| 2009 | VA | 2100 | 3.80 | Class Not Ranked | East Asian | 21.7% |
| 2009 | NJ | 2100 | 3.61 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 9.7% |
| 2009 | VA | 2090 | 3.96 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 44.2% |
| 2009 | (Private) | 2090 | 3.70 | Class Not Ranked | East Asian | 33.9% |
| 2009 | MN | 2090 | 3.38 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 10.6% |
| 2009 | PA | 2080 | 3.67 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 17.2% |
| 2009 | CA | 2080 | 3.50 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 7.6% |
| 2009 | TX | 2080 | 3.75 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 25.6% |
| 2009 | NC | 2080 | 3.57 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 14.9% |
| 2009 | MD | 2080 | 3.87 | Top 20% | South Asian | 20.2% |
| 2009 | NY | 2070 | 3.85 | Top 20% | East Asian | 38.7% |
| 2009 | MI | 2060 | 3.61 | Class Not Ranked | South Asian | 13.7% |
| 2009 | NY | 2060 | 3.70 | Class Not Ranked | South Asian | 30.7% |
| 2009 | NJ | 2060 | 3.80 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 22.7% |
| 2009 | NY | 2060 | 3.25 | Class Not Ranked | Middle-Eastern | 7.7% |
| 2009 | MA | 2050 | 3.20 | Class Not Ranked | East Asian | 2.5% |
| 2009 | CA | 2050 | 3.93 | Top 1% | Caucasian | 41.3% |
| 2009 | (Private) | 2050 | 3.86 | Top 5% | East Asian | 30.8% |
| 2009 | PA | 2050 | 3.75 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 18.7% |
| 2009 | (Private) | 2050 | 3.66 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 21.5% |
| 2009 | VA | 2050 | 3.80 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 21.7% |
| 2009 | VA | 2050 | 3.78 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 24.8% |
| 2009 | XX | 2040 | 3.80 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 25.4% |
| 2009 | MN | 2030 | 3.93 | Valedictorian | Caucasian | 52.4% |
| 2009 | PA | 2010 | 3.90 | Top 10% | Hispanic | 82.2% |
| 2009 | WI | 2010 | 3.70 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 20.7% |
| 2009 | CA | 2010 | 3.80 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 12.2% |
| 2009 | NY | 2010 | 3.80 | Top 10% | Hispanic | 86.9% |
| 2009 | NJ | 2000 | 3.65 | Unknown | Caucasian | 15.6% |
| 2009 | CA | 2000 | 3.90 | Top 10% | Middle-Eastern | 24.1% |
| 2009 | XX | 2000 | 3.60 | Top 20% | South Asian | 6.0% |
| 2009 | XX | 2000 | 4.00 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 37.1% |
| 2009 | (Private) | 2000 | 3.15 | Top 20% | Hispanic | 11.0% |
| 2009 | NY | 2000 | 3.80 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 38.0% |
| 2009 | FL | 1990 | 3.90 | Top 5% | South Asian | 27.7% |
| 2009 | CA | 1980 | 3.75 | Top 5% | Other | 24.7% |
| 2009 | XX | 1980 | 3.95 | Top 1% | East Asian | 35.0% |
| 2009 | NY | 1970 | 3.70 | Top 30% | Caucasian | 14.1% |
| 2009 | XX | 1970 | 4.00 | Top 10% | East Asian | 28.4% |
| 2009 | XX | 1970 | 4.00 | Top 5% | Other | 33.7% |
| 2009 | XX | 1970 | 4.00 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 33.7% |
| 2009 | DE | 1960 | 3.40 | Class Not Ranked | East Asian | 3.1% |
| 2009 | CA | 1960 | 3.81 | Class Not Ranked | East Asian | 12.6% |
| 2009 | CA | 1960 | 3.70 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 7.0% |
| 2009 | GA | 1950 | 3.95 | Top 1% | Caucasian | 38.5% |
| 2009 | TX | 1950 | 3.98 | Top 20% | East Asian | 16.8% |
| 2009 | NJ | 1950 | 3.50 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 3.3% |
| 2009 | NJ | 1950 | 3.75 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 9.9% |
| 2009 | FL | 1940 | 3.52 | Top 10% | Hispanic | 45.6% |
| 2009 | NJ | 1940 | 3.70 | Top 10% | Other | 10.5% |
| 2009 | PA | 1910 | 3.64 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 4.5% |
| 2009 | NY | 1910 | 3.60 | Class Not Ranked | East Asian | 12.8% |
| 2009 | FL | 1890 | 3.70 | Top 10% | East Asian | 8.0% |
| 2009 | CA | 1880 | 3.40 | Class Not Ranked | None Indicated | 2.9% |
| 2009 | CA | 1880 | 3.79 | Top 10% | Hispanic | 54.7% |
| 2009 | PA | 1870 | 3.90 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 43.6% |
| 2009 | MA | 1820 | 3.89 | Top 20% | Hispanic | 44.2% |
| 2009 | NY | 1810 | 3.00 | Unknown | Hispanic | 9.9% |
| 2009 | NY | 1780 | 3.80 | Top 20% | East Asian | 11.1% |
| 2009 | OH | 1760 | 3.64 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 14.0% |
| 2009 | (Private) | 1750 | 3.80 | Top 20% | African-American | 28.5% |
| 2009 | MA | 1750 | 3.63 | Top 10% | East Asian | 3.3% |
| 2009 | NC | 1740 | 2.70 | Top 40% | African-American | 0.2% |
| 2009 | NY | 1700 | 3.85 | Class Not Ranked | Hispanic | 77.5% |
| 2009 | MD | 1670 | 3.10 | Class Not Ranked | African-American | 2.5% |
| 2009 | NY | 1560 | 3.50 | Top 5% | South Asian | 2.9% |
| 2009 | NY | 1320 | 2.89 | Top 20% | Native American | 0.6% |
| 2009 | CT | 35 | 3.67 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 30.4% |
| 2009 | NC | 34 | 3.35 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 8.4% |
| 2009 | CA | 33 | 3.50 | Top 10% | South Asian | 15.4% |
| 2009 | WI | 32 | 3.63 | Top 10% | Middle-Eastern | 18.0% |
| 2009 | PA | 32 | 3.67 | Class Not Ranked | South Asian | 16.6% |
| 2009 | MI | 31 | 4.00 | Valedictorian | Caucasian | 51.5% |
| 2009 | NY | 31 | 3.80 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 52.5% |
| 2009 | DC | 30 | 3.52 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 11.8% |
| 2009 | TX | 30 | 3.89 | Top 10% | South Asian | 24.2% |
| 2009 | CA | 28 | 3.80 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 9.0% |
| 2009 | IL | 28 | 3.50 | Top 20% | Hispanic | 20.8% |
| 2009 | NJ | 28 | 3.00 | Top 40% | Caucasian | 0.1% |
| 2009 | MN | 27 | 3.50 | Unknown | African-American | 20.0% |
| 2009 | CA | 27 | 4.00 | Valedictorian | None Indicated | 24.6% |
| 2009 | CT | 24 | 4.00 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 10.1% |
| 2008 | CO | 2400 | 3.80 | Top 5% | South Asian | 66.7% |
| 2008 | CT | 2370 | 3.98 | Top 1% | Caucasian | 80.4% |
| 2008 | XX | 2360 | 4.00 | Valedictorian | East Asian | 81.6% |
| 2008 | VA | 2350 | 3.85 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 59.4% |
| 2008 | XX | 2330 | 4.00 | Top 5% | East Asian | 74.9% |
| 2008 | CA | 2310 | 3.86 | Top 5% | East Asian | 61.6% |
| 2008 | PA | 2300 | 3.85 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 41.2% |
| 2008 | OH | 2290 | 4.00 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 70.9% |
| 2008 | VA | 2280 | 3.65 | Unknown | East Asian | 27.9% |
| 2008 | CA | 2280 | 3.85 | Top 20% | None Indicated | 38.7% |
| 2008 | CA | 2270 | 3.87 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 57.9% |
| 2008 | VA | 2260 | 4.00 | Top 1% | Caucasian | 71.9% |
| 2008 | XX | 2260 | 3.20 | Unknown | East Asian | 6.2% |
| 2008 | CA | 2250 | 3.70 | Top 5% | East Asian | 50.7% |
| 2008 | CA | 2230 | 3.90 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 67.4% |
| 2008 | MA | 2210 | 3.56 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 20.2% |
| 2008 | MN | 2200 | 3.65 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 25.0% |
| 2008 | CA | 2200 | 3.83 | Top 10% | East Asian | 39.3% |
| 2008 | XX | 2180 | 3.50 | Top 1% | South Asian | 21.5% |
| 2008 | MD | 2180 | 3.90 | Valedictorian | None Indicated | 55.9% |
| 2008 | VA | 2180 | 3.66 | Unknown | Caucasian | 19.8% |
| 2008 | CO | 2180 | 3.80 | Top 10% | East Asian | 34.7% |
| 2008 | MA | 2170 | 3.40 | Unknown | Caucasian | 8.1% |
| 2008 | CA | 2170 | 3.69 | Top 20% | East Asian | 16.8% |
| 2008 | CA | 2160 | 3.67 | Unknown | East Asian | 18.7% |
| 2008 | OH | 2160 | 3.42 | Top 20% | South Asian | 6.6% |
| 2008 | FL | 2150 | 4.00 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 49.0% |
| 2008 | FL | 2130 | 3.80 | Top 5% | None Indicated | 41.6% |
| 2008 | FL | 2130 | 3.80 | Top 5% | Other | 34.6% |
| 2008 | NY | 2130 | 3.75 | Top 30% | None Indicated | 26.2% |
| 2008 | MA | 2120 | 3.70 | Unknown | Caucasian | 17.5% |
| 2008 | NY | 2090 | 3.70 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 28.6% |
| 2008 | TX | 2090 | 3.55 | Top 20% | Hispanic | 45.9% |
| 2008 | CA | 2080 | 3.95 | Unknown | East Asian | 30.4% |
| 2008 | NY | 2080 | 3.30 | Class Not Ranked | South Asian | 9.9% |
| 2008 | CA | 2050 | 3.72 | Class Not Ranked | Other | 13.8% |
| 2008 | FL | 2040 | 3.30 | Bottom 50% | Hispanic | 5.5% |
| 2008 | GA | 2020 | 4.00 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 28.1% |
| 2008 | NJ | 2020 | 3.90 | Top 1% | Caucasian | 35.2% |
| 2008 | NJ | 2010 | 3.20 | Top 40% | Hispanic | 5.4% |
| 2008 | MD | 2000 | 3.90 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 16.2% |
| 2008 | CA | 1990 | 4.00 | Valedictorian | Caucasian | 41.6% |
| 2008 | NC | 1990 | 2.76 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 0.3% |
| 2008 | RI | 1980 | 3.70 | Top 5% | None Indicated | 14.9% |
| 2008 | CA | 1950 | 3.25 | Top 30% | None Indicated | 0.8% |
| 2008 | FL | 1940 | 4.00 | Valedictorian | Caucasian | 36.0% |
| 2008 | XX | 1940 | 3.80 | Top 5% | Hispanic | 68.4% |
| 2008 | NY | 1940 | 3.70 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 16.1% |
| 2008 | NY | 1920 | 3.63 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 31.8% |
| 2008 | NY | 1920 | 3.70 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 22.1% |
| 2008 | NY | 1880 | 3.65 | Top 20% | None Indicated | 18.3% |
| 2008 | XX | 1830 | 3.80 | Top 5% | South Asian | 10.8% |
| 2008 | XX | 1760 | 3.75 | Top 5% | Hispanic | 42.6% |
| 2008 | CA | 1680 | 3.30 | Top 10% | Middle-Eastern | 0.7% |
| 2008 | XX | 1620 | 2.98 | Unknown | Caucasian | 0.2% |
| 2008 | CA | 1610 | 3.71 | Top 5% | African-American | 34.9% |
| 2008 | XX | 1540 | 3.97 | Top 10% | East Asian | 4.1% |
| 2008 | FL | 30 | 3.71 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 14.1% |
| 2008 | (Private) | 34 | 3.65 | Class Not Ranked | East Asian | 26.4% |
| 2008 | CA | 33 | 3.71 | Top 20% | East Asian | 19.5% |
| 2008 | NY | 33 | 3.63 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 39.2% |
| 2008 | XX | 32 | 4.00 | Top 5% | East Asian | 52.7% |
| 2008 | MA | 32 | 3.90 | Unknown | Caucasian | 31.8% |
| 2008 | (Private) | 31 | 3.93 | Top 1% | South Asian | 43.8% |
| 2008 | NY | 31 | 3.70 | Top 1% | None Indicated | 48.2% |
| 2008 | MI | 31 | 3.80 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 23.5% |
| 2008 | IL | 30 | 3.88 | Valedictorian | Caucasian | 33.6% |
| 2008 | NY | 29 | 3.95 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 45.4% |
| 2008 | WA | 28 | 3.90 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 15.5% |
| 2007 | NY | 2350 | 3.70 | Top 30% | Caucasian | 46.4% |
| 2007 | XX | 2330 | 4.00 | Salutatorian | East Asian | 79.3% |
| 2007 | NJ | 2310 | 3.86 | Top 10% | South Asian | 55.6% |
| 2007 | NY | 2240 | 3.95 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 81.7% |
| 2007 | CA | 2200 | 3.75 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 46.1% |
| 2007 | VA | 2180 | 3.75 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 30.6% |
| 2007 | CA | 2160 | 3.70 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 24.8% |
| 2007 | NJ | 2100 | 3.68 | Class Not Ranked | East Asian | 15.1% |
| 2007 | MA | 2070 | 3.50 | Top 10% | East Asian | 9.2% |
| 2007 | NY | 2040 | 3.68 | Top 20% | None Indicated | 25.1% |
| 2007 | FL | 1950 | 3.86 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 21.4% |
| 2007 | FL | 1940 | 3.30 | Top 20% | Hispanic | 13.8% |
| 2007 | NY | 1920 | 3.65 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 21.5% |
| 2007 | (Private) | 1900 | 3.83 | Unknown | Caucasian | 24.4% |
| 2007 | FL | 1880 | 3.65 | Top 10% | Hispanic | 41.9% |
| 2007 | CA | 1840 | 4.00 | Salutatorian | Hispanic | 77.9% |
| 2007 | MA | 1800 | 3.80 | Top 30% | Caucasian | 2.9% |
| 2007 | CA | 33 | 3.83 | Class Not Ranked | Other | 32.6% |
| 2007 | IL | 32 | 3.75 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 25.6% |
| 2007 | VA | 30 | 3.62 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 6.7% |
| 2006 | NC | 2240 | 3.96 | Top 1% | East Asian | 66.9% |
| 2006 | CA | 2220 | 3.80 | Unknown | East Asian | 33.4% |
| 2006 | PA | 2210 | 3.96 | Top 5% | South Asian | 58.8% |
| 2006 | OH | 2190 | 3.91 | Unknown | Caucasian | 39.4% |
| 2006 | MO | 1950 | 3.40 | Class Not Ranked | African-American | 23.8% |
| 2005 | NJ | 2230 | 3.90 | Unknown | Caucasian | 43.2% |
| 2005 | NY | 1290 | 3.90 | Top 10% | None Indicated | 39.1% |
| 2003 | NY | 2190 | 3.72 | Unknown | Caucasian | 47.4% |
| |