Colgate University Applications and Decisions
Below is a list of applicants who have demonstrated interest in Colgate University. Our best formula
for this college is based on
85 members who were accepted or rejected. The formula
has a college admissions prediction accuracy of
88%?.
Because not all members have filled out the most recent version of our survey, some predictions are made based on
less-accurate models. Those are noted with an asterisk (*) next to their prediction.
This is a very popular school, so we're only showing you profiles that have received an admissions decision. If you
want to see all applicants to this school,
click here (caution: the page will take awhile to load).
|
| 2010 | PA | 2220 | 3.80 | Top 10% | Middle-Eastern | 96.6% |
| 2010 | NJ | 2010 | 3.62 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 12.4% |
| 2010 | MA | 1870 | 3.42 | Top 25% | African-American | 96.3% |
| 2009 | RI | 2250 | 3.90 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 99.1% |
| 2009 | MA | 2160 | 3.65 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 96.5% |
| 2009 | CA | 2140 | 3.70 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 86.5% |
| 2009 | PA | 2140 | 3.40 | Unknown | Caucasian | 51.1% |
| 2009 | (Private) | 2120 | 4.00 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 68.3% |
| 2009 | CO | 34 | 3.87 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 97.6% |
| 2009 | UT | 31 | 3.93 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 81.2% |
| 2008 | (Private) | 2290 | 3.80 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 99.4% |
| 2008 | VT | 2070 | 3.80 | Unknown | East Asian | 66.3% |
| 2008 | PA | 2040 | 3.85 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 55.1% |
| 2007 | CA | 2060 | 3.40 | Top 30% | Caucasian | 84.2% |
| 2006 | MD | 2160 | 3.69 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 75.4% |
|
| 2010 | ME | 2270 | 3.99 | Salutatorian | Caucasian | 96.7% |
| 2010 | PA | 2090 | 3.85 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 57.6% |
| 2010 | DC | 33 | 3.95 | Top 5% | African-American | 100.0% |
| 2009 | NJ | 2340 | 3.66 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 99.9% |
| 2009 | MA | 2300 | 3.84 | Top 5% | East Asian | 98.8% |
| 2009 | NC | 2300 | 3.95 | Top 1% | Caucasian | 98.4% |
| 2009 | XX | 2250 | 3.88 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 99.0% |
| 2009 | (Private) | 2220 | 4.00 | Valedictorian | Caucasian | 96.4% |
| 2009 | NJ | 2220 | 3.38 | Top 20% | Hispanic | 100.0% |
| 2009 | CA | 2190 | 3.80 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 79.3% |
| 2009 | XX | 2190 | 3.71 | Class Not Ranked | Other | 96.2% |
| 2009 | TX | 2180 | 3.80 | Top 20% | Other | 99.1% |
| 2009 | HI | 2180 | 3.70 | Unknown | Other | 95.0% |
| 2009 | NY | 2170 | 4.00 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 88.2% |
| 2009 | MA | 2140 | 3.85 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 82.4% |
| 2009 | NH | 2140 | 3.89 | Top 5% | Hispanic | 100.0% |
| 2009 | NY | 2120 | 3.94 | Top 1% | African-American | 99.9% |
| 2009 | NY | 2050 | 3.84 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 18.1% |
| 2009 | WA | 2030 | 3.90 | Unknown | Caucasian | 56.8% |
| 2009 | PA | 2020 | 4.00 | Top 1% | Caucasian | 50.7% |
| 2009 | NJ | 1920 | 4.00 | Top 5% | Hispanic | 96.1% |
| 2009 | CA | 1880 | 3.79 | Top 10% | Hispanic | 89.6% |
| 2009 | CT | 35 | 3.67 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 100.0% |
| 2009 | CA | 33 | 3.90 | Top 5% | East Asian | 87.5% |
| 2009 | WI | 32 | 3.75 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 67.0% |
| 2009 | DC | 29 | 3.70 | Top 10% | None Indicated | 1.4% |
| 2008 | MA | 2310 | 4.00 | Valedictorian | Caucasian | 98.8% |
| 2008 | OH | 2290 | 4.00 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 99.4% |
| 2008 | MD | 2280 | 3.85 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 98.1% |
| 2008 | TX | 2230 | 3.95 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 96.3% |
| 2008 | CA | 2230 | 3.90 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 98.5% |
| 2008 | VA | 2210 | 3.95 | Top 5% | None Indicated | 94.2% |
| 2008 | XX | 2200 | 4.00 | Top 5% | None Indicated | 94.2% |
| 2008 | (Private) | 2170 | 3.50 | Class Not Ranked | East Asian | 80.6% |
| 2008 | FL | 2150 | 4.00 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 94.0% |
| 2008 | PA | 2140 | 4.00 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 77.5% |
| 2008 | (Private) | 2120 | 3.94 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 95.6% |
| 2008 | TX | 2120 | 4.00 | Salutatorian | Hispanic | 99.9% |
| 2008 | XX | 2070 | 4.00 | Unknown | Hispanic | 100.0% |
| 2008 | MD | 1460 | 4.00 | Unknown | Caucasian | 99.3% |
| 2008 | CA | 34 | 4.00 | Class Not Ranked | None Indicated | 99.9% |
| 2008 | MA | 33 | 3.80 | Top 5% | None Indicated | 79.3% |
| 2008 | MA | 32 | 3.90 | Unknown | Caucasian | 94.4% |
| 2008 | HI | 31 | 3.50 | Class Not Ranked | Hispanic | 99.8% |
| 2007 | PA | 2170 | 4.00 | Top 1% | Caucasian | 73.8% |
| 2006 | NJ | 2170 | 3.47 | Unknown | Caucasian | 97.6% |
| 2006 | MO | 1950 | 3.40 | Class Not Ranked | African-American | 94.2% |
| 2001 | CA | 2080 | 3.80 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 42.4% |
|
|
| 2010 | IL | 24 | 3.40 | Top 25% | Caucasian | 0.0% |
| 2009 | XX | 2210 | 4.00 | Valedictorian | East Asian | 86.7% |
| 2009 | NY | 2190 | 3.68 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 65.1% |
| 2009 | XX | 2170 | 3.97 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 86.2% |
| 2009 | XX | 2110 | 4.00 | Top 5% | South Asian | 61.3% |
| 2009 | NY | 2080 | 3.99 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 40.7% |
| 2009 | NY | 2070 | 3.50 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 8.7% |
| 2009 | CT | 2050 | 3.30 | Unknown | Caucasian | 5.3% |
| 2009 | GA | 2000 | 3.51 | Top 20% | South Asian | 16.3% |
| 2009 | WA | 1990 | 3.95 | Top 1% | Caucasian | 3.3% |
| 2009 | MA | 1990 | 3.47 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 10.1% |
| 2009 | XX | 1970 | 3.90 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 21.8% |
| 2009 | NY | 1960 | 3.20 | Top 40% | Caucasian | 56.6% |
| 2009 | TX | 1950 | 3.98 | Top 20% | East Asian | 46.9% |
| 2009 | CA | 1910 | 3.70 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 6.3% |
| 2009 | MD | 1880 | 3.46 | Top 5% | None Indicated | 0.0% |
| 2009 | NY | 1810 | 3.00 | Unknown | Hispanic | 6.2% |
| 2009 | NY | 1810 | 3.00 | Top 20% | Hispanic | 11.5% |
| 2009 | (Private) | 1640 | 3.30 | Top 25% | Caucasian | 0.0% |
| 2009 | IL | 32 | 3.75 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 37.6% |
| 2009 | CA | 27 | 4.00 | Valedictorian | None Indicated | 0.0% |
| 2008 | XX | 2150 | 3.70 | Top 5% | East Asian | 43.4% |
| 2008 | FL | 2070 | 3.79 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 14.0% |
| 2008 | XX | 2050 | 4.00 | Top 10% | South Asian | 53.1% |
| 2008 | NY | 1920 | 3.63 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 0.4% |
| 2008 | NH | 1910 | 3.70 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 5.6% |
| 2008 | NJ | 1630 | 3.08 | Bottom 40% | Caucasian | 1.6% |
| |