Michigan State University Applications and Decisions
Below is a list of applicants who have demonstrated interest in Michigan State University. Our best formula for this college is based on members who were accepted or rejected. The formula has a college admissions prediction accuracy of %?. Because not all members have filled out the most recent version of our survey, some predictions are made based on less-accurate models. Those are noted with an asterisk (*) next to their prediction.
This is a very popular school, so we're only showing you profiles that have received an admissions decision.
Recent Admissions Results from 631 Members |
|||||||
Member |
Year Entering |
State |
SAT/ACT |
GPA |
Class Rank |
Ethnic Heritage |
Prediction ? |
| Accepted And Attending (16) | |||||||
| 2010 | GA | 1600 | 2.90 | Top 25% | African-American | ||
| 2010 | MN | 35 | 3.84 | Top 5% | Caucasian | ||
| 2010 | MI | 33 | 3.30 | Unknown | South Asian | ||
| 2010 | MI | 32 | 3.75 | Top 10% | Caucasian | ||
| 2010 | MI | 24 | 3.83 | Top 4% | Caucasian | ||
| 2009 | MI | 31 | 3.80 | Top 10% | Caucasian | ||
| 2009 | MI | 29 | 3.10 | Top 30% | South Asian | ||
| 2009 | MI | 28 | 3.87 | Top 5% | Caucasian | ||
| 2009 | MI | 27 | 3.30 | Top 30% | Caucasian | ||
| 2009 | MI | 26 | 3.10 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | ||
| 2009 | MI | 26 | 3.90 | Bottom 50% | East Asian | ||
| 2009 | MI | 25 | 3.39 | Top 30% | Caucasian | ||
| 2008 | MI | 30 | 3.30 | Unknown | Caucasian | ||
| 2007 | MI | 1590 | 4.00 | Top 5% | Caucasian | ||
| 2007 | MI | 31 | 3.60 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | ||
| 2007 | IL | 26 | 3.49 | Top 20% | Caucasian | ||
| Accepted (133) | |||||||
| 2010 | MI | 2380 | 3.61 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | ||
| 2010 | TX | 2350 | 2.70 | Top 40% | East Asian | ||
| 2010 | MI | 2220 | 3.50 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | ||
| 2010 | MI | 2190 | 3.96 | Top 10% | South Asian | ||
| 2010 | PA | 2150 | 3.83 | Top 3% | Caucasian | ||
| 2010 | MN | 2120 | 3.30 | Class Not Ranked | East Asian | ||
| 2010 | XX | 2100 | 4.00 | Top 1% | Caucasian | ||
| 2010 | MI | 2060 | 3.87 | Top 2% | Caucasian | ||
| 2010 | MI | 2020 | 3.50 | Class Not Ranked | None Indicated | ||
| 2010 | MI | 1990 | 3.98 | Valedictorian | Caucasian | ||
| 2010 | PA | 1930 | 3.20 | Top 35% | Caucasian | ||
| 2010 | OH | 1890 | 2.80 | Top 25% | African-American | ||
| 2010 | NV | 1890 | 4.00 | Valedictorian | South Asian | ||
| 2010 | OH | 1870 | 4.00 | Top 1% | Caucasian | ||
| 2010 | MI | 1870 | 3.87 | Top 5% | Caucasian | ||
| 2010 | OH | 1810 | 3.23 | Top 40% | South Asian | ||
| 2010 | MI | 1810 | 3.70 | Unknown | East Asian | ||
| 2010 | NJ | 1780 | 3.63 | Top 20% | Caucasian | ||
| 2010 | PA | 1730 | 3.26 | Bottom 50% | Caucasian | ||
| 2010 | NJ | 1670 | 3.08 | Class Not Ranked | South Asian | ||
| 2010 | VA | 1580 | 3.80 | Top 15% | South Asian | ||
| 2010 | IL | 1560 | 3.75 | Top 15% | Caucasian | ||
| 2010 | CA | 1520 | 2.90 | Top 40% | South Asian | ||
| 2010 | CA | 1510 | 3.77 | Top 15% | Caucasian | ||
| 2010 | NY | 1360 | 3.05 | Bottom 50% | Caucasian | ||
| 2010 | CA | 1060 | 3.00 | Unknown | Caucasian | ||
| 2010 | MI | 790 | 3.63 | Bottom 50% | South Asian | ||
| 2010 | IN | 35 | 3.90 | Top 2% | Caucasian | ||
| 2010 | MI | 34 | 3.99 | Salutatorian | Caucasian | ||
| 2010 | MI | 33 | 4.00 | Valedictorian | Middle-Eastern | ||
| 2010 | MI | 33 | 3.98 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | ||
| 2010 | IL | 33 | 4.00 | Top 1% | Caucasian | ||
| 2010 | IL | 33 | 3.30 | Top 20% | Caucasian | ||
| 2010 | MI | 32 | 3.83 | Top 30% | Caucasian | ||
| 2010 | MI | 32 | 3.80 | Top 20% | Caucasian | ||
| 2010 | MI | 31 | 3.50 | Top 20% | Caucasian | ||
| 2010 | MI | 30 | 3.38 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | ||
| 2010 | MI | 30 | 3.72 | Top 25% | Caucasian | ||
| 2010 | MI | 30 | 3.40 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | ||
| 2010 | MI | 30 | 3.60 | Unknown | Caucasian | ||
| 2010 | CA | 29 | 3.65 | Top 15% | Caucasian | ||
| 2010 | MI | 29 | 3.74 | Top 10% | Caucasian | ||
| 2010 | MI | 29 | 3.61 | Top 25% | Caucasian | ||
| 2010 | MI | 29 | 3.79 | Top 20% | Caucasian | ||
| 2010 | MI | 29 | 3.54 | Top 35% | Caucasian | ||
| 2010 | MI | 29 | 3.88 | Top 10% | East Asian | ||
| 2010 | MI | 29 | 3.85 | Top 10% | Caucasian | ||
| 2010 | MI | 29 | 3.72 | Top 10% | Caucasian | ||
| 2010 | MI | 28 | 3.44 | Top 25% | Caucasian | ||
| 2010 | MN | 27 | 3.05 | Bottom 50% | Caucasian | ||
| 2010 | GA | 27 | 3.80 | Class Not Ranked | African-American | ||
| 2010 | MI | 27 | 3.00 | Class Not Ranked | African-American | ||
| 2010 | WI | 27 | 3.60 | Top 20% | Caucasian | ||
| 2010 | MI | 26 | 3.78 | Top 15% | Caucasian | ||
| 2010 | IL | 26 | 3.65 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | ||
| 2010 | NJ | 25 | 3.73 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | ||
| 2010 | (Private) | 25 | 3.64 | Top 30% | South Asian | ||
| 2010 | IL | 25 | 3.55 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | ||
| 2010 | OH | 25 | 3.30 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | ||
| 2010 | (Private) | 24 | 3.63 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | ||
| 2009 | (Private) | 2340 | 3.93 | Top 1% | South Asian | ||
| 2009 | MI | 2290 | 3.97 | Top 10% | South Asian | ||
| 2009 | MI | 2280 | 3.95 | Top 1% | Caucasian | ||
| 2009 | MI | 2230 | 3.88 | Unknown | East Asian | ||
| 2009 | CA | 2230 | 4.00 | Top 5% | Caucasian | ||
| 2009 | MI | 2190 | 3.70 | Top 10% | Caucasian | ||
| 2009 | MI | 2130 | 3.50 | Top 30% | Caucasian | ||
| 2009 | MI | 2090 | 3.60 | Top 5% | Caucasian | ||
| 2009 | MI | 2060 | 3.61 | Class Not Ranked | South Asian | ||
| 2009 | MI | 1950 | 3.50 | Valedictorian | Caucasian | ||
| 2009 | MI | 1890 | 3.80 | Top 10% | Caucasian | ||
| 2009 | NJ | 1850 | 3.81 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | ||
| 2009 | NY | 1770 | 2.90 | Unknown | Caucasian | ||
| 2009 | MI | 1750 | 3.87 | Top 10% | Caucasian | ||
| 2009 | CT | 1670 | 2.80 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | ||
| 2009 | TX | 1450 | 3.00 | Top 30% | Hispanic | ||
| 2009 | (Private) | 34 | 3.99 | Top 1% | East Asian | ||
| 2009 | MI | 32 | 3.95 | Top 5% | Caucasian | ||
| 2009 | (Private) | 32 | 3.94 | Top 10% | South Asian | ||
| 2009 | MI | 31 | 3.77 | Top 10% | Caucasian | ||
| 2009 | MI | 31 | 4.00 | Valedictorian | Caucasian | ||
| 2009 | MI | 31 | 3.97 | Unknown | Caucasian | ||
| 2009 | MI | 31 | 3.63 | Top 30% | Caucasian | ||
| 2009 | MI | 31 | 3.52 | Class Not Ranked | South Asian | ||
| 2009 | MI | 30 | 3.74 | Top 10% | Caucasian | ||
| 2009 | MI | 30 | 3.55 | Top 30% | Caucasian | ||
| 2009 | MI | 30 | 3.80 | Top 5% | Caucasian | ||
| 2009 | MI | 30 | 3.73 | Top 10% | Caucasian | ||
| 2009 | MI | 30 | 3.48 | Top 30% | Caucasian | ||
| 2009 | MI | 29 | 3.50 | Top 30% | South Asian | ||
| 2009 | IL | 28 | 3.80 | Top 10% | Caucasian | ||
| 2009 | MI | 28 | 3.64 | Unknown | Caucasian | ||
| 2009 | MI | 28 | 3.60 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | ||
| 2009 | MI | 28 | 3.97 | Top 5% | East Asian | ||
| 2009 | FL | 28 | 3.50 | Top 30% | Caucasian | ||
| 2009 | MI | 27 | 3.58 | Top 20% | Caucasian | ||
| 2009 | MI | 27 | 3.70 | Top 20% | East Asian | ||
| 2009 | MI | 26 | 3.55 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | ||
| 2009 | MI | 26 | 3.56 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | ||
| 2009 | MI | 26 | 3.56 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | ||
| 2009 | MI | 25 | 3.73 | Unknown | Caucasian | ||
| 2009 | NC | 25 | 3.20 | Top 40% | Hispanic | ||
| 2008 | IL | 2270 | 3.98 | Unknown | Caucasian | ||
| 2008 | TX | 2230 | 3.80 | Unknown | Hispanic | ||
| 2008 | MI | 2130 | 3.98 | Unknown | East Asian | ||
| 2008 | MI | 2110 | 3.81 | Unknown | East Asian | ||
| 2008 | VA | 1940 | 3.99 | Top 20% | Caucasian | ||
| 2008 | XX | 1940 | 3.90 | Top 20% | Caucasian | ||
| 2008 | NY | 1860 | 3.50 | Top 20% | Caucasian | ||
| 2008 | AK | 1820 | 3.50 | Unknown | Other | ||
| 2008 | (Private) | 35 | 3.60 | Top 30% | Caucasian | ||
| 2008 | MI | 34 | 3.67 | Top 10% | Caucasian | ||
| 2008 | MI | 34 | 3.88 | Top 5% | Caucasian | ||
| 2008 | TX | 33 | 3.78 | Top 5% | Caucasian | ||
| 2008 | AK | 33 | 3.80 | Top 5% | Other | ||
| 2008 | MI | 31 | 3.69 | Class Not Ranked | South Asian | ||
| 2008 | MI | 30 | 3.88 | Top 10% | Caucasian | ||
| 2008 | MI | 30 | 3.97 | Salutatorian | Caucasian | ||
| 2008 | WI | 29 | 3.49 | Unknown | East Asian | ||
| 2008 | MI | 26 | 3.90 | Top 10% | Caucasian | ||
| 2008 | MI | 25 | 3.89 | Top 5% | Caucasian | ||
| 2008 | MI | 24 | 3.43 | Top 40% | South Asian | ||
| 2007 | MI | 2160 | 4.00 | Valedictorian | Caucasian | ||
| 2007 | XX | 2020 | 3.84 | Top 1% | None Indicated | ||
| 2007 | VA | 2020 | 3.20 | Top 20% | South Asian | ||
| 2007 | FL | 1950 | 3.86 | Top 5% | Caucasian | ||
| 2007 | AZ | 1930 | 3.55 | Top 20% | Caucasian | ||
| 2007 | MI | 1830 | 3.83 | Unknown | Caucasian | ||
| 2007 | CA | 1720 | 3.70 | Top 10% | None Indicated | ||
| 2007 | MI | 1420 | 3.85 | Top 5% | Caucasian | ||
| 2007 | IL | 32 | 3.75 | Top 10% | Caucasian | ||
| 2006 | MI | 29 | 3.80 | Top 10% | Caucasian | ||
| 2006 | MI | 29 | 3.57 | Unknown | Caucasian | ||
| Denied Admission (4) | |||||||
| 2010 | NY | 1690 | 3.40 | Unknown | Caucasian | ||
| 2010 | MI | 26 | 2.80 | Top 30% | Caucasian | ||
| 2009 | MI | 27 | 3.40 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | ||
| 2008 | MI | 24 | 3.29 | Unknown | Caucasian | ||