Vassar College Applications and Decisions
Below is a list of applicants who have demonstrated interest in Vassar College. Our best formula
for this college is based on
69 members who were accepted or rejected. The formula
has a college admissions prediction accuracy of
80%?.
Because not all members have filled out the most recent version of our survey, some predictions are made based on
less-accurate models. Those are noted with an asterisk (*) next to their prediction.
This is a very popular school, so we're only showing you profiles that have received an admissions decision. If you
want to see all applicants to this school,
click here (caution: the page will take awhile to load).
|
| 2010 | NY | 33 | 3.55 | Unknown | None Indicated | 0.0% |
| 2009 | MI | 2190 | 3.70 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 99.8% |
| 2009 | CT | 2030 | 3.70 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 32.5% |
| 2009 | NY | 1970 | 3.60 | Top 10% | Hispanic | 85.9% |
| 2009 | CA | 1920 | 3.70 | Top 20% | Other | 5.0% |
| 2009 | IL | 31 | 3.85 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 59.4% |
| 2007 | OR | 2100 | 3.84 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 44.5% |
|
| 2009 | PA | 2380 | 4.00 | Valedictorian | Caucasian | 73.1% |
| 2009 | PA | 2350 | 3.80 | Top 10% | Other | 100.0% |
| 2009 | MA | 2330 | 3.89 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 90.1% |
| 2009 | PA | 2260 | 3.98 | Valedictorian | Caucasian | 100.0% |
| 2009 | CA | 2220 | 3.76 | Unknown | Caucasian | 51.9% |
| 2009 | TX | 2180 | 3.80 | Top 20% | Other | 68.9% |
| 2009 | OK | 2150 | 4.00 | Valedictorian | Caucasian | 100.0% |
| 2009 | TX | 2110 | 3.68 | Top 10% | East Asian | 100.0% |
| 2009 | (Private) | 2100 | 4.00 | Top 1% | Caucasian | 47.9% |
| 2009 | NY | 2080 | 3.95 | Salutatorian | Caucasian | 74.7% |
| 2009 | XX | 2060 | 4.00 | Top 1% | Other | 100.0% |
| 2009 | MN | 2030 | 3.93 | Valedictorian | Caucasian | 93.6% |
| 2009 | WA | 1990 | 3.95 | Top 1% | Caucasian | 62.8% |
| 2009 | NJ | 1990 | 3.55 | Top 20% | Hispanic | 83.8% |
| 2009 | XX | 1990 | 3.90 | Top 1% | East Asian | 83.5% |
| 2009 | XX | 1980 | 3.80 | Top 10% | South Asian | 38.3% |
| 2009 | CA | 1880 | 3.87 | Top 10% | Hispanic | 79.2% |
| 2009 | CA | 1770 | 3.83 | Class Not Ranked | African-American | 76.1% |
| 2009 | IL | 35 | 3.88 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 100.0% |
| 2009 | IL | 33 | 3.70 | Top 10% | None Indicated | 85.0% |
| 2009 | DC | 29 | 3.70 | Top 10% | None Indicated | 55.5% |
| 2008 | NY | 2270 | 3.91 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 87.5% |
| 2008 | CO | 2250 | 4.00 | Valedictorian | Caucasian | 100.0% |
| 2008 | CA | 2200 | 3.98 | Top 5% | Hispanic | 97.9% |
| 2008 | FL | 2070 | 3.79 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 81.7% |
| 2008 | IL | 30 | 3.88 | Valedictorian | Caucasian | 83.7% |
| 2007 | NJ | 2310 | 3.86 | Top 10% | South Asian | 81.1%* |
| 2007 | NJ | 2260 | 3.84 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 79.3%* |
| 2007 | NC | 2200 | 3.78 | Top 20% | None Indicated | 52.6%* |
| 2007 | MA | 2140 | 3.80 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 64.2%* |
| 2007 | CA | 1840 | 4.00 | Salutatorian | Hispanic | 95.5%* |
| 2003 | NJ | 2220 | 3.90 | Top 10% | South Asian | 76.9%* |
|
|
| 2010 | XX | 2200 | 3.80 | Top 5% | Other | 70.1% |
| 2010 | NY | 2040 | 3.50 | Class Not Ranked | None Indicated | 0.1% |
| 2010 | CA | 2010 | 3.60 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 0.3% |
| 2010 | CA | 25 | 3.80 | Unknown | Caucasian | 34.9% |
| 2009 | VA | 2340 | 3.74 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 48.4% |
| 2009 | NY | 2270 | 3.92 | Top 2% | Caucasian | 100.0% |
| 2009 | CT | 2220 | 3.70 | Unknown | Caucasian | 25.8% |
| 2009 | XX | 2190 | 3.80 | Unknown | East Asian | 21.8% |
| 2009 | CT | 2150 | 3.60 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 71.4% |
| 2009 | PA | 2140 | 3.40 | Unknown | Caucasian | 42.2% |
| 2009 | PA | 2120 | 3.46 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 5.0% |
| 2009 | MA | 2110 | 3.30 | Top 40% | Caucasian | 1.9% |
| 2009 | TX | 2090 | 3.80 | Top 30% | Caucasian | 21.5% |
| 2009 | NH | 2060 | 4.00 | Valedictorian | Caucasian | 76.7% |
| 2009 | NJ | 2050 | 3.50 | Class Not Ranked | South Asian | 3.6% |
| 2009 | FL | 2040 | 3.70 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 0.0% |
| 2009 | XX | 2000 | 4.00 | Top 1% | East Asian | 69.2% |
| 2009 | XX | 1970 | 3.90 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 52.8% |
| 2009 | XX | 1970 | 4.00 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 47.2% |
| 2009 | NY | 1940 | 3.50 | Top 40% | Caucasian | 8.4% |
| 2009 | NY | 1810 | 3.00 | Top 20% | Hispanic | 0.1% |
| 2009 | CA | 1780 | 3.87 | Top 10% | Hispanic | 79.4% |
| 2008 | (Private) | 2360 | 3.34 | Unknown | Caucasian | 29.2%* |
| 2008 | CT | 2230 | 3.71 | Unknown | Caucasian | 28.1% |
| 2008 | XX | 2180 | 3.50 | Top 1% | South Asian | 4.2% |
| 2008 | (Private) | 2170 | 3.50 | Class Not Ranked | East Asian | 7.9% |
| 2008 | WA | 2020 | 3.92 | Top 10% | East Asian | 61.4% |
| 2008 | WA | 1730 | 3.71 | Top 30% | Caucasian | 65.9% |
| 2008 | XX | 31 | 3.90 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 66.1% |
| 2008 | AZ | 28 | 3.30 | Bottom 50% | Caucasian | 1.9% |
| 2007 | XX | 2080 | 3.33 | Top 10% | South Asian | 7.6% |
| 2007 | VT | 2030 | 4.00 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 72.6%* |
| |