Ursinus College Applications and Decisions
Below is a list of applicants who have demonstrated interest in Ursinus College. Our best formula
for this college is based on
33 members who were accepted or rejected. The formula
has a college admissions prediction accuracy of
100%?.
Because not all members have filled out the most recent version of our survey, some predictions are made based on
less-accurate models. Those are noted with an asterisk (*) next to their prediction.
|
| 2011 | CA | 1810 | 3.45 | Top 40% | Caucasian | 100.0% |
| 2010 | PA | 2350 | 3.95 | Top 1% | East Asian | 100.0% |
| 2010 | CA | 2300 | 3.91 | Top 10% | African-American | 100.0% |
| 2010 | ME | 2270 | 3.99 | Salutatorian | Caucasian | 100.0% |
| 2010 | TX | 2250 | 3.70 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 100.0% |
| 2010 | NJ | 2160 | 3.70 | Top 3% | Caucasian | 100.0% |
| 2010 | NJ | 2150 | 3.50 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 100.0% |
| 2010 | (Private) | 2130 | 3.84 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 100.0% |
| 2010 | PA | 2120 | 3.92 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 100.0% |
| 2010 | PA | 2060 | 3.80 | Unknown | Caucasian | 100.0% |
| 2010 | CA | 2050 | 3.80 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 100.0% |
| 2010 | NJ | 2010 | 3.62 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 100.0% |
| 2010 | IA | 2000 | 3.50 | Top 30% | Caucasian | 100.0% |
| 2010 | PA | 1960 | 3.90 | Top 3% | South Asian | 100.0% |
| 2010 | PA | 1950 | 3.81 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 100.0% |
| 2010 | (Private) | 1950 | 3.00 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 0.0% |
| 2010 | CT | 1920 | 3.30 | Top 25% | East Asian | 0.0% |
| 2010 | VA | 1800 | 3.00 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 0.0% |
| 2010 | MA | 1790 | 3.82 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 100.0% |
| 2010 | CT | 1730 | 3.40 | Unknown | Native American | 100.0% |
| 2010 | PA | 1710 | 3.46 | Class Not Ranked | Hispanic | 100.0% |
| 2010 | PA | 1650 | 3.50 | Top 15% | South Asian | 3.2% |
| 2010 | MI | 28 | 3.83 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 100.0% |
| 2010 | OR | 22 | 3.43 | Top 20% | Hispanic | 100.0% |
| 2009 | PA | 2290 | 4.00 | Valedictorian | Caucasian | 100.0% |
| 2009 | PA | 2180 | 3.60 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 100.0% |
| 2009 | MD | 2060 | 3.71 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 100.0% |
| 2009 | (Private) | 2050 | 3.70 | Unknown | East Asian | 100.0% |
| 2009 | CA | 2050 | 3.96 | Valedictorian | Caucasian | 100.0% |
| 2009 | PA | 2010 | 3.90 | Top 10% | Hispanic | 100.0% |
| 2009 | PA | 1960 | 3.50 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 100.0% |
| 2009 | MD | 1940 | 3.80 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 100.0% |
| 2009 | (Private) | 1930 | 3.25 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 100.0% |
| 2009 | NY | 1860 | 3.40 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 100.0% |
| 2009 | NJ | 1810 | 3.40 | Top 30% | Caucasian | 100.0% |
| 2009 | NJ | 1770 | 3.50 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 100.0% |
| 2009 | PA | 1680 | 4.00 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 100.0% |
| 2009 | (Private) | 1660 | 3.70 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 100.0% |
| 2009 | CT | 1650 | 3.40 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 100.0% |
| 2009 | CA | 31 | 3.10 | Top 30% | Caucasian | 100.0% |
| 2008 | PA | 2240 | 3.45 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 100.0% |
| 2008 | NH | 2160 | 3.40 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 94.2%* |
| 2008 | NH | 2130 | 3.20 | Top 40% | Hispanic | 89.0%* |
| 2008 | (Private) | 2070 | 4.00 | Salutatorian | Caucasian | 100.0% |
| 2008 | NY | 2040 | 3.80 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 98.2%* |
| 2008 | MA | 2040 | 3.03 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 100.0% |
| 2008 | PA | 2020 | 3.70 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 100.0% |
| 2008 | NJ | 2010 | 3.20 | Top 40% | Hispanic | 100.0% |
| 2008 | NJ | 1990 | 3.85 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 100.0% |
| 2008 | PA | 1980 | 3.39 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 92.8%* |
| 2008 | MD | 1930 | 3.70 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 100.0% |
| 2008 | PR | 1760 | 3.01 | Bottom 50% | Hispanic | 66.1%* |
| 2008 | NJ | 1680 | 3.60 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 90.9%* |
|
|
| 2009 | XX | 2240 | 3.30 | Unknown | South Asian | 0.0% |
| 2009 | VA | 2100 | 3.60 | Unknown | East Asian | 100.0% |
| 2009 | (Private) | 1710 | 2.99 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 0.1% |
| 2009 | FL | 1520 | 3.20 | Top 40% | Caucasian | 0.0% |
| 2008 | PA | 1390 | 3.50 | Top 25% | Caucasian | 100.0% |
|
| 2010 | NY | 1940 | 3.68 | Top 15% | Caucasian | 100.0% |
| 2010 | CO | 1930 | 3.30 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 47.7% |
| 2010 | CT | 1890 | 3.40 | Unknown | Caucasian | 100.0% |
| 2010 | NJ | 32 | 4.00 | Top 2% | Caucasian | 100.0% |
| 2009 | PA | 2080 | 3.64 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 100.0% |
| 2009 | MA | 1900 | 3.20 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 0.0% |
| 2009 | PA | 1810 | 3.75 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 100.0% |
| 2009 | PA | 1650 | 3.70 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 100.0% |
| 2009 | PA | 1550 | 3.85 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 100.0% |
| 2009 | PA | 1550 | 3.76 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 100.0% |
| 2009 | PA | 24 | 3.60 | Top 40% | Caucasian | 93.1% |
| 2008 | MA | 2230 | 4.00 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 100.0% |
| 2008 | PA | 2040 | 3.60 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 95.9%* |
| 2008 | ME | 1870 | 3.30 | Bottom 40% | Caucasian | 85.7%* |
| 2007 | NJ | 1780 | 3.20 | Top 20% | South Asian | 77.9%* |
| 2007 | CA | 1750 | 3.50 | Top 10% | Hispanic | 89.6%* |
|
| 2011 | NY | 2090 | 3.60 | Top 25% | Caucasian | 100.0% |
| 2011 | (Private) | 2050 | 3.50 | Unknown | Caucasian | 100.0% |
| 2011 | PA | 1900 | 3.40 | Top 40% | East Asian | 100.0% |
| 2011 | PA | 1830 | 3.24 | Unknown | Caucasian | 100.0% |
| 2011 | PA | 1650 | 3.50 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 92.6% |
| 2010 | WA | 2280 | 2.80 | Bottom 50% | South Asian | 0.0% |
| 2010 | (Private) | 2170 | 3.40 | Class Not Ranked | Hispanic | 100.0% |
| 2010 | (Private) | 2090 | 3.84 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 100.0% |
| 2010 | VA | 2080 | 3.52 | Unknown | Caucasian | 100.0% |
| 2010 | PA | 2080 | 3.86 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 100.0% |
| 2010 | MN | 2060 | 2.80 | Bottom 50% | Caucasian | 0.0% |
| 2010 | NJ | 2010 | 3.40 | Top 20% | East Asian | 100.0% |
| 2010 | PA | 1930 | 3.90 | Top 3% | Caucasian | 100.0% |
| 2010 | MD | 1930 | 3.00 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 0.0% |
| 2010 | NJ | 1910 | 4.00 | Top 1% | South Asian | 100.0% |
| 2010 | PA | 1860 | 3.90 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 100.0% |
| 2010 | NC | 1840 | 2.30 | Bottom 50% | Caucasian | 0.0% |
| 2010 | PA | 1820 | 2.99 | Top 20% | South Asian | 0.0% |
| 2010 | CA | 1810 | 3.43 | Top 30% | Caucasian | 0.0% |
| 2010 | NY | 1760 | 3.40 | Unknown | South Asian | 100.0% |
| 2010 | VA | 1750 | 3.00 | Top 40% | Caucasian | 0.0% |
| 2010 | PA | 1720 | 3.50 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 100.0% |
| 2010 | PA | 1640 | 3.88 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 100.0% |
| 2010 | MD | 1600 | 3.60 | Top 25% | Caucasian | 58.1% |
| 2010 | MD | 1600 | 3.60 | Top 25% | Caucasian | 100.0% |
| 2010 | PA | 1570 | 2.66 | Top 40% | Caucasian | 0.0% |
| 2010 | NJ | 1570 | 3.52 | Top 30% | Caucasian | 85.4% |
| 2010 | PA | 1550 | 3.97 | Top 1% | East Asian | 100.0% |
| 2010 | PA | 1310 | 3.40 | Bottom 50% | Caucasian | 34.2% |
| 2010 | PA | 33 | 3.72 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 100.0% |
| 2010 | AL | 28 | 4.00 | Top 2% | African-American | 100.0% |
| 2010 | FL | 25 | 3.28 | Top 25% | Caucasian | 80.8% |
| 2009 | NJ | 2380 | 4.00 | Valedictorian | None Indicated | 100.0% |
| 2009 | NJ | 2200 | 4.00 | Class Not Ranked | South Asian | 100.0% |
| 2009 | WA | 2130 | 3.65 | Top 20% | None Indicated | 100.0% |
| 2009 | NJ | 2090 | 3.90 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 100.0% |
| 2009 | NJ | 1980 | 3.70 | Top 10% | South Asian | 100.0% |
| 2009 | PA | 1930 | 3.80 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 100.0% |
| 2009 | MD | 1910 | 3.72 | Top 30% | Hispanic | 100.0% |
| 2009 | PA | 1910 | 3.40 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 79.8% |
| 2009 | NJ | 1860 | 3.60 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 100.0% |
| 2009 | ME | 1800 | 3.30 | Bottom 50% | Caucasian | 84.6%* |
| 2009 | PA | 1800 | 3.80 | Unknown | Caucasian | 100.0% |
| 2009 | DE | 1780 | 3.50 | Top 20% | Hispanic | 100.0% |
| 2009 | XX | 1770 | 3.50 | Top 10% | East Asian | 100.0% |
| 2009 | PA | 1740 | 3.40 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 1.1% |
| 2009 | NY | 1700 | 3.00 | Top 40% | Caucasian | 0.0% |
| 2009 | CT | 1500 | 3.10 | Top 40% | South Asian | 0.0% |
| 2009 | NJ | 1500 | 2.80 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 0.0% |
| 2008 | MD | 2330 | 3.96 | Salutatorian | Caucasian | 99.3%* |
| 2008 | PA | 1980 | 3.69 | Class Not Ranked | Other | 96.7%* |
| 2008 | PA | 1980 | 3.83 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 97.7%* |
| 2008 | PA | 1750 | 2.90 | Unknown | Caucasian | 55.8%* |
| 2008 | LA | 1730 | 3.45 | Unknown | African-American | 89.8%* |
| 2008 | PA | 1540 | 3.60 | Top 5% | African-American | 100.0% |
| 2008 | NY | 32 | 4.00 | Unknown | None Indicated | 99.0%* |
| 2008 | IL | 28 | 2.90 | Bottom 50% | Caucasian | 63.8%* |
| |