University of Virginia Applications and Decisions
Below is a list of applicants who have demonstrated interest in University of Virginia. Our best formula
for this college is based on
250 members who were accepted or rejected. The formula
has a college admissions prediction accuracy of
80%?.
Because not all members have filled out the most recent version of our survey, some predictions are made based on
less-accurate models. Those are noted with an asterisk (*) next to their prediction.
This is a very popular school, so we're only showing you profiles that have received an admissions decision. If you
want to see all applicants to this school,
click here (caution: the page will take awhile to load).
|
| 2009 | NJ | 2400 | 3.50 | Top 10% | African-American | 88.2% |
| 2009 | GA | 2310 | 3.90 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 81.9% |
| 2009 | LA | 2250 | 3.75 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 28.8% |
| 2009 | RI | 2220 | 3.80 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 85.0% |
| 2009 | VA | 2220 | 4.00 | Top 1% | South Asian | 98.6% |
| 2009 | VA | 2140 | 3.96 | Top 1% | Other | 97.3% |
| 2009 | (Private) | 2130 | 4.00 | Valedictorian | Caucasian | 91.8% |
| 2009 | VA | 2100 | 3.80 | Class Not Ranked | East Asian | 79.5% |
| 2009 | VA | 2050 | 3.81 | Top 5% | East Asian | 87.9% |
| 2009 | VA | 2040 | 3.80 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 86.7% |
| 2009 | TX | 1990 | 3.80 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 75.5% |
| 2009 | VA | 1980 | 4.00 | Valedictorian | Caucasian | 98.2% |
| 2009 | VA | 1860 | 3.90 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 71.8% |
| 2009 | DE | 1820 | 3.97 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 43.8% |
| 2008 | VA | 2140 | 3.95 | Unknown | None Indicated | 90.3% |
| 2008 | FL | 2130 | 3.80 | Top 5% | Other | 75.5% |
| 2008 | VA | 2100 | 3.98 | Top 1% | Caucasian | 99.0% |
| 2008 | VA | 2070 | 3.93 | Top 5% | Other | 93.2% |
| 2008 | VA | 2070 | 3.40 | Top 10% | East Asian | 49.0% |
| 2008 | VA | 2010 | 4.00 | Top 1% | Caucasian | 94.6% |
| 2008 | VA | 1860 | 4.00 | Top 1% | Caucasian | 86.6% |
| 2008 | VA | 1740 | 3.73 | Unknown | Caucasian | 20.5% |
| 2008 | VA | 33 | 3.65 | Class Not Ranked | None Indicated | 79.2% |
| 2008 | VA | 31 | 3.91 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 88.8% |
| 2007 | TN | 2190 | 3.91 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 34.3% |
| 2006 | VA | 2020 | 3.90 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 89.6% |
| 2003 | VA | 2240 | 3.90 | Unknown | East Asian | 93.8% |
|
| 2012 | NJ | 2400 | 4.00 | Top 10% | Middle-Eastern | 88.7% |
| 2009 | VA | 2370 | 3.91 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 99.2% |
| 2009 | NJ | 2370 | 4.00 | Valedictorian | Caucasian | 98.3% |
| 2009 | MD | 2350 | 4.00 | Top 1% | Caucasian | 92.8% |
| 2009 | VA | 2340 | 3.99 | Unknown | Caucasian | 97.7% |
| 2009 | NY | 2330 | 3.70 | Unknown | Caucasian | 47.3% |
| 2009 | NC | 2330 | 3.93 | Top 1% | Caucasian | 89.5% |
| 2009 | GA | 2320 | 4.00 | Valedictorian | Caucasian | 92.0% |
| 2009 | VA | 2320 | 3.83 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 98.0% |
| 2009 | NY | 2310 | 3.99 | Valedictorian | East Asian | 91.2% |
| 2009 | NJ | 2310 | 3.90 | Top 5% | Hispanic | 97.1% |
| 2009 | KY | 2300 | 3.66 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 61.1% |
| 2009 | NC | 2300 | 3.95 | Top 1% | Caucasian | 88.3% |
| 2009 | VA | 2280 | 4.00 | Class Not Ranked | East Asian | 96.7% |
| 2009 | ME | 2270 | 4.00 | Top 5% | None Indicated | 84.0% |
| 2009 | (Private) | 2270 | 3.75 | Top 5% | Native American | 93.3% |
| 2009 | WV | 2270 | 3.95 | Top 1% | Caucasian | 86.1% |
| 2009 | MO | 2250 | 3.94 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 79.7% |
| 2009 | FL | 2250 | 3.92 | Salutatorian | South Asian | 83.9% |
| 2009 | VA | 2250 | 4.00 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 98.4% |
| 2009 | (Private) | 2250 | 3.83 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 58.7% |
| 2009 | PA | 2240 | 3.89 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 73.1% |
| 2009 | (Private) | 2240 | 3.90 | Salutatorian | Caucasian | 81.8% |
| 2009 | (Private) | 2240 | 3.75 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 37.7% |
| 2009 | VA | 2210 | 3.89 | Top 10% | East Asian | 95.0% |
| 2009 | VA | 2210 | 3.90 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 96.9% |
| 2009 | (Private) | 2190 | 4.00 | Top 1% | Caucasian | 81.5% |
| 2009 | CO | 2180 | 3.84 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 83.7% |
| 2009 | CT | 2180 | 3.97 | Top 1% | Caucasian | 78.6% |
| 2009 | VA | 2170 | 3.92 | Top 5% | Hispanic | 99.8% |
| 2009 | TN | 2160 | 4.00 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 68.2% |
| 2009 | PA | 2150 | 3.88 | Top 1% | South Asian | 67.4% |
| 2009 | VA | 2140 | 4.00 | Valedictorian | East Asian | 97.9% |
| 2009 | NJ | 2130 | 3.80 | Top 5% | None Indicated | 47.1% |
| 2009 | OH | 2120 | 4.00 | Valedictorian | Caucasian | 82.9% |
| 2009 | VA | 2120 | 3.84 | Top 10% | East Asian | 89.3% |
| 2009 | MA | 2120 | 3.67 | Top 10% | East Asian | 23.5% |
| 2009 | NJ | 2110 | 3.70 | Top 5% | East Asian | 33.8% |
| 2009 | VA | 2110 | 4.00 | Top 1% | East Asian | 97.2% |
| 2009 | XX | 2100 | 3.75 | Top 1% | South Asian | 46.1% |
| 2009 | VA | 2100 | 3.96 | Salutatorian | Middle-Eastern | 96.8% |
| 2009 | VA | 2100 | 4.00 | Valedictorian | Middle-Eastern | 97.3% |
| 2009 | FL | 2100 | 3.95 | Top 2% | Caucasian | 64.1% |
| 2009 | VA | 2090 | 3.80 | Salutatorian | Caucasian | 98.1% |
| 2009 | VA | 2090 | 3.90 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 93.3% |
| 2009 | VA | 2090 | 3.96 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 94.7% |
| 2009 | VA | 2090 | 3.99 | Valedictorian | None Indicated | 97.0% |
| 2009 | (Private) | 2080 | 3.90 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 67.7% |
| 2009 | VA | 2080 | 3.80 | Top 10% | None Indicated | 84.2% |
| 2009 | NY | 2050 | 3.80 | Top 1% | Caucasian | 56.3% |
| 2009 | VA | 1990 | 3.70 | Top 5% | East Asian | 75.4% |
| 2009 | VA | 1970 | 3.87 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 84.6% |
| 2009 | VA | 1960 | 3.96 | Top 5% | South Asian | 88.0% |
| 2009 | VA | 1920 | 3.90 | Top 1% | Caucasian | 86.5% |
| 2009 | VA | 1880 | 4.00 | Salutatorian | Hispanic | 98.4% |
| 2009 | VA | 1760 | 3.90 | Salutatorian | Caucasian | 70.6% |
| 2009 | VA | 1610 | 3.30 | Unknown | East Asian | 1.8% |
| 2009 | MS | 1580 | 3.89 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 36.6% |
| 2009 | VA | 30 | 4.00 | Top 5% | East Asian | 92.4% |
| 2009 | PA | 31 | 4.00 | Salutatorian | Caucasian | 68.4% |
| 2009 | VA | 34 | 3.98 | Top 1% | Caucasian | 98.9% |
| 2009 | VA | 33 | 3.80 | Valedictorian | Caucasian | 96.6% |
| 2009 | IL | 28 | 3.50 | Top 20% | Hispanic | 8.7% |
| 2008 | (Private) | 2400 | 4.00 | Class Not Ranked | East Asian | 83.2% |
| 2008 | MI | 2400 | 3.99 | Top 1% | Caucasian | 94.6% |
| 2008 | VA | 2370 | 4.00 | Class Not Ranked | East Asian | 98.5% |
| 2008 | (Private) | 2360 | 3.86 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 77.2% |
| 2008 | SC | 2350 | 4.00 | Top 1% | East Asian | 92.8% |
| 2008 | VA | 2350 | 3.85 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 97.6% |
| 2008 | TN | 2330 | 4.00 | Top 1% | None Indicated | 91.9% |
| 2008 | VA | 2330 | 3.96 | Top 5% | East Asian | 98.9% |
| 2008 | VA | 2320 | 3.73 | Top 20% | South Asian | 88.8% |
| 2008 | (Private) | 2310 | 4.00 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 73.0% |
| 2008 | TN | 2300 | 4.00 | Valedictorian | South Asian | 93.0% |
| 2008 | VA | 2300 | 3.99 | Top 5% | African-American | 99.8% |
| 2008 | VA | 2280 | 4.00 | Salutatorian | None Indicated | 99.2% |
| 2008 | CA | 2270 | 4.00 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 84.0% |
| 2008 | VA | 2260 | 4.00 | Top 1% | Caucasian | 99.0% |
| 2008 | CA | 2240 | 4.00 | Salutatorian | Caucasian | 87.2% |
| 2008 | LA | 2230 | 4.00 | Valedictorian | Caucasian | 93.0% |
| 2008 | CA | 2230 | 3.90 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 62.2% |
| 2008 | NC | 2210 | 3.80 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 68.8% |
| 2008 | WI | 2210 | 3.98 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 82.3% |
| 2008 | VA | 2210 | 3.95 | Top 5% | None Indicated | 99.3% |
| 2008 | VA | 2200 | 3.90 | Unknown | East Asian | 91.9% |
| 2008 | VA | 2200 | 3.97 | Top 1% | Other | 98.2% |
| 2008 | MD | 2200 | 3.90 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 68.1% |
| 2008 | TX | 2160 | 4.00 | Salutatorian | Caucasian | 79.8% |
| 2008 | MD | 2120 | 3.75 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 14.5% |
| 2008 | (Private) | 2110 | 3.69 | Top 5% | South Asian | 32.9% |
| 2008 | VA | 2100 | 3.60 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 51.6% |
| 2008 | VA | 2100 | 3.80 | Unknown | South Asian | 79.5% |
| 2008 | VA | 2080 | 4.00 | Top 1% | Other | 97.5% |
| 2008 | (Private) | 2070 | 3.95 | Top 1% | African-American | 92.3% |
| 2008 | NY | 2060 | 3.90 | Unknown | Hispanic | 71.5% |
| 2008 | NJ | 2040 | 3.80 | Top 10% | Hispanic | 69.6% |
| 2008 | VA | 2030 | 3.97 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 92.5% |
| 2008 | CT | 2020 | 3.95 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 33.0% |
| 2008 | PA | 2010 | 3.94 | Salutatorian | African-American | 89.4% |
| 2008 | VA | 2010 | 4.00 | Valedictorian | South Asian | 95.1% |
| 2008 | CA | 1990 | 3.97 | Top 1% | None Indicated | 63.5% |
| 2008 | VA | 1860 | 4.00 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 77.4% |
| 2008 | NC | 1830 | 3.62 | Top 5% | African-American | 29.6% |
| 2008 | FL | 35 | 3.98 | Top 1% | South Asian | 91.8% |
| 2008 | NY | 35 | 4.00 | Valedictorian | Caucasian | 93.0% |
| 2008 | (Private) | 33 | 3.94 | Top 5% | None Indicated | 70.4% |
| 2007 | (Private) | 2400 | 3.70 | Unknown | Caucasian | 58.8% |
| 2007 | NY | 2350 | 3.70 | Unknown | None Indicated | 50.4% |
| 2007 | VA | 2290 | 3.99 | Top 1% | Middle-Eastern | 99.1% |
| 2007 | NY | 2270 | 3.75 | Unknown | Caucasian | 42.5% |
| 2007 | NM | 2230 | 4.00 | Valedictorian | Caucasian | 88.9% |
| 2007 | (Private) | 2180 | 4.00 | Valedictorian | East Asian | 82.0% |
| 2007 | VA | 2170 | 3.67 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 85.1% |
| 2007 | PA | 2120 | 3.89 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 54.8% |
| 2007 | FL | 2080 | 3.60 | Top 10% | Hispanic | 82.0% |
| 2007 | VA | 1730 | 3.58 | Top 10% | Other | 17.2% |
| 2007 | VA | 30 | 3.62 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 38.7% |
| 2006 | TX | 2130 | 4.00 | Class Not Ranked | Hispanic | 85.8% |
| 2005 | XX | 2390 | 4.00 | Valedictorian | Caucasian | 94.9% |
| 2005 | VA | 1790 | 3.40 | Class Not Ranked | Hispanic | 41.0% |
| 2003 | VA | 1890 | 4.00 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 84.5% |
| 2002 | NY | 2370 | 3.50 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 24.3% |
| 2002 | VA | 1420 | 4.00 | Salutatorian | Caucasian | 99.1% |
| 2000 | NY | 2360 | 4.00 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 90.6% |
|
|
|
| 2010 | NJ | 2200 | 4.00 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 56.1% |
| 2009 | NJ | 2400 | 3.80 | Class Not Ranked | Other | 68.4% |
| 2009 | NJ | 2230 | 3.77 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 60.5% |
| 2009 | NJ | 2220 | 3.38 | Top 20% | Hispanic | 34.9% |
| 2009 | MD | 2210 | 3.57 | Unknown | None Indicated | 19.0% |
| 2009 | TX | 2200 | 3.30 | Top 10% | Other | 10.1% |
| 2009 | MD | 2200 | 3.57 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 25.6% |
| 2009 | PA | 2200 | 3.85 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 63.5% |
| 2009 | IL | 2190 | 3.70 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 47.8% |
| 2009 | RI | 2190 | 3.93 | Salutatorian | Caucasian | 78.4% |
| 2009 | TX | 2160 | 3.92 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 41.4% |
| 2009 | PA | 2160 | 3.80 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 40.6% |
| 2009 | NY | 2110 | 3.96 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 52.0% |
| 2009 | NY | 2110 | 3.60 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 17.5% |
| 2009 | NJ | 2100 | 3.60 | Top 10% | East Asian | 26.8% |
| 2009 | TX | 2080 | 3.75 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 31.3% |
| 2009 | PA | 2080 | 3.85 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 43.7% |
| 2009 | MD | 2080 | 3.87 | Top 20% | South Asian | 17.4% |
| 2009 | PA | 2080 | 3.72 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 15.2% |
| 2009 | FL | 2070 | 3.86 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 32.4% |
| 2009 | OH | 2070 | 3.75 | Class Not Ranked | African-American | 58.9% |
| 2009 | NY | 2050 | 3.84 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 41.2% |
| 2009 | (Private) | 2050 | 3.86 | Top 5% | East Asian | 39.8% |
| 2009 | PA | 2050 | 3.75 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 20.9% |
| 2009 | (Private) | 2050 | 3.66 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 10.3% |
| 2009 | VA | 2050 | 3.80 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 81.4% |
| 2009 | VA | 2050 | 3.78 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 86.5% |
| 2009 | NJ | 2050 | 3.08 | Class Not Ranked | African-American | 7.2% |
| 2009 | (Private) | 2040 | 3.33 | Unknown | East Asian | 2.7% |
| 2009 | NH | 2020 | 3.87 | Top 5% | South Asian | 36.0% |
| 2009 | MD | 2020 | 4.00 | Top 1% | Caucasian | 58.3% |
| 2009 | OH | 2010 | 3.60 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 6.4% |
| 2009 | VA | 2000 | 3.72 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 88.7% |
| 2009 | GA | 2000 | 3.51 | Top 20% | South Asian | 2.7% |
| 2009 | (Private) | 1990 | 3.86 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 9.9% |
| 2009 | VA | 1990 | 3.75 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 70.3% |
| 2009 | VA | 1980 | 3.00 | Top 20% | South Asian | 3.8% |
| 2009 | XX | 1970 | 3.60 | Top 1% | East Asian | 16.2% |
| 2009 | NJ | 1970 | 3.62 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 5.4% |
| 2009 | NJ | 1950 | 3.75 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 7.9% |
| 2009 | NJ | 1950 | 3.84 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 16.5% |
| 2009 | OH | 1930 | 3.70 | Class Not Ranked | South Asian | 5.7% |
| 2009 | NY | 1880 | 3.65 | Top 30% | Caucasian | 0.9% |
| 2009 | VA | 1840 | 3.30 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 5.1% |
| 2009 | VA | 1800 | 3.20 | Class Not Ranked | African-American | 24.4% |
| 2009 | (Private) | 1790 | 3.45 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 0.8% |
| 2009 | VA | 1770 | 2.75 | Bottom 40% | South Asian | 0.0% |
| 2009 | VA | 1760 | 3.60 | Top 20% | South Asian | 9.8% |
| 2009 | PA | 1740 | 4.00 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 12.9% |
| 2009 | MD | 1670 | 3.10 | Class Not Ranked | African-American | 0.7% |
| 2009 | (Private) | 1500 | 3.40 | Unknown | East Asian | 0.2% |
| 2009 | LA | 1410 | 3.85 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 49.7% |
| 2009 | (Private) | 33 | 3.72 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 27.5% |
| 2009 | CT | 32 | 3.72 | Top 10% | East Asian | 28.7% |
| 2009 | CA | 32 | 3.78 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 34.0% |
| 2009 | CA | 31 | 3.94 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 40.0% |
| 2009 | MD | 30 | 3.90 | Top 20% | Hispanic | 52.8% |
| 2009 | DC | 29 | 3.70 | Top 10% | None Indicated | 9.9% |
| 2009 | OH | 28 | 3.71 | Class Not Ranked | Middle-Eastern | 4.6% |
| 2008 | CT | 2320 | 3.54 | Top 20% | East Asian | 21.2% |
| 2008 | VA | 2290 | 3.35 | Class Not Ranked | East Asian | 68.2% |
| 2008 | MA | 2210 | 3.56 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 26.3% |
| 2008 | DC | 2200 | 3.58 | Unknown | Caucasian | 18.4% |
| 2008 | CO | 2180 | 3.98 | Top 1% | None Indicated | 79.3% |
| 2008 | VA | 2180 | 3.66 | Unknown | Caucasian | 78.9% |
| 2008 | CA | 2170 | 3.56 | Top 10% | None Indicated | 21.2% |
| 2008 | OH | 2160 | 3.42 | Top 20% | South Asian | 5.3% |
| 2008 | (Private) | 2150 | 4.00 | Unknown | Caucasian | 48.1% |
| 2008 | PA | 2140 | 4.00 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 68.4% |
| 2008 | CA | 2130 | 3.25 | Bottom 40% | Caucasian | 0.1% |
| 2008 | TN | 2120 | 3.30 | Unknown | Other | 6.2% |
| 2008 | TX | 2120 | 3.84 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 68.3% |
| 2008 | MD | 2120 | 3.85 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 29.0% |
| 2008 | VA | 2110 | 3.70 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 63.1% |
| 2008 | NJ | 2060 | 3.93 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 48.9% |
| 2008 | FL | 2040 | 3.30 | Bottom 50% | Hispanic | 0.7% |
| 2008 | MD | 2040 | 3.76 | Top 10% | South Asian | 20.6% |
| 2008 | VA | 1990 | 3.85 | Top 5% | Other | 85.1% |
| 2008 | VA | 1980 | 3.30 | Class Not Ranked | None Indicated | 43.1% |
| 2008 | MA | 1980 | 3.70 | Top 10% | None Indicated | 11.9% |
| 2008 | PA | 1970 | 3.85 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 12.9% |
| 2008 | VA | 1960 | 3.80 | Top 10% | Hispanic | 94.7% |
| 2008 | VA | 1960 | 3.70 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 71.5% |
| 2008 | NY | 1950 | 3.70 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 14.9% |
| 2008 | PA | 1930 | 3.80 | Unknown | Caucasian | 8.4% |
| 2008 | MD | 1910 | 3.50 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 1.4% |
| 2008 | AK | 1740 | 3.75 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 8.3% |
| 2008 | VA | 1730 | 3.81 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 17.5% |
| 2008 | MA | 1380 | 3.80 | Class Not Ranked | Hispanic | 63.8% |
| 2008 | OH | 33 | 4.00 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 75.3% |
| 2008 | LA | 32 | 3.87 | Top 5% | None Indicated | 54.3% |
| 2008 | NY | 29 | 3.95 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 23.7% |
| 2007 | CO | 2060 | 3.40 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 2.6% |
| 2007 | IL | 34 | 3.56 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 34.0% |
| 2006 | TX | 2030 | 3.80 | Top 10% | Other | 22.3% |
| |