University of Texas at Austin Applications and Decisions
Below is a list of applicants who have demonstrated interest in University of Texas at Austin. Our best formula
for this college is based on
148 members who were accepted or rejected. The formula
has a college admissions prediction accuracy of
89%?.
Because not all members have filled out the most recent version of our survey, some predictions are made based on
less-accurate models. Those are noted with an asterisk (*) next to their prediction.
This is a very popular school, so we're only showing you profiles that have received an admissions decision. If you
want to see all applicants to this school,
click here (caution: the page will take awhile to load).
|
| 2010 | TX | 2120 | 3.70 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 82.4% |
| 2010 | FL | 2090 | 3.63 | Class Not Ranked | East Asian | 80.8% |
| 2010 | TX | 2090 | 3.93 | Top 15% | South Asian | 91.2% |
| 2010 | TX | 2080 | 3.75 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 96.1% |
| 2010 | TX | 2070 | 3.91 | Top 15% | Hispanic | 98.1% |
| 2010 | TX | 33 | 3.80 | Top 30% | East Asian | 57.4% |
| 2010 | TX | 33 | 3.95 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 100.0% |
| 2009 | TX | 2230 | 3.98 | Salutatorian | Caucasian | 99.6% |
| 2009 | TX | 2200 | 3.42 | Top 10% | East Asian | 97.5% |
| 2009 | TX | 2110 | 3.73 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 98.2% |
| 2009 | CA | 2100 | 3.90 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 50.9% |
| 2009 | TX | 2100 | 3.16 | Top 20% | East Asian | 82.8% |
| 2009 | TX | 2000 | 3.83 | Top 10% | East Asian | 91.9% |
| 2009 | NC | 1970 | 3.50 | Top 20% | Hispanic | 79.3% |
| 2009 | TX | 1960 | 3.66 | Top 20% | South Asian | 65.1% |
| 2009 | TX | 1940 | 3.83 | Top 30% | Caucasian | 99.9% |
| 2009 | (Private) | 610 | 3.51 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 94.9% |
| 2008 | CA | 2030 | 3.36 | Top 20% | East Asian | 44.7% |
| 2008 | TX | 1780 | 3.67 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 59.7% |
| 2008 | NY | 31 | 3.64 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 67.7% |
| 2008 | TX | 30 | 3.80 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 92.4% |
| 2007 | TX | 2060 | 3.70 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 97.4% |
| 2002 | TX | 1530 | 4.00 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 99.3% |
|
| 2011 | TX | 2260 | 3.92 | Top 2% | South Asian | 99.4% |
| 2011 | TX | 1660 | 3.97 | Salutatorian | East Asian | 88.6% |
| 2010 | TX | 2400 | 3.98 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 99.6% |
| 2010 | OR | 2400 | 4.00 | Valedictorian | South Asian | 99.3% |
| 2010 | XX | 2400 | 4.00 | Valedictorian | South Asian | 100.0% |
| 2010 | TX | 2390 | 4.00 | Top 5% | East Asian | 99.6% |
| 2010 | TX | 2380 | 3.99 | Valedictorian | African-American | 100.0% |
| 2010 | TX | 2380 | 3.98 | Top 1% | South Asian | 99.8% |
| 2010 | NC | 2370 | 3.40 | Top 30% | Caucasian | 52.7% |
| 2010 | FL | 2370 | 4.00 | Valedictorian | South Asian | 99.2% |
| 2010 | TX | 2370 | 3.98 | Valedictorian | East Asian | 99.8% |
| 2010 | TX | 2360 | 3.97 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 100.0% |
| 2010 | TX | 2360 | 4.00 | Salutatorian | East Asian | 99.8% |
| 2010 | TX | 2330 | 3.98 | Top 1% | East Asian | 99.7% |
| 2010 | TX | 2330 | 4.00 | Top 1% | South Asian | 99.7% |
| 2010 | TX | 2320 | 3.53 | Top 15% | East Asian | 97.2% |
| 2010 | TX | 2310 | 3.83 | Salutatorian | Caucasian | 99.7% |
| 2010 | TX | 2300 | 3.90 | Top 3% | Caucasian | 99.6% |
| 2010 | TX | 2300 | 3.94 | Top 1% | East Asian | 99.6% |
| 2010 | TX | 2300 | 4.00 | Top 1% | Caucasian | 99.6% |
| 2010 | TX | 2290 | 3.52 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 96.7% |
| 2010 | TX | 2280 | 4.00 | Top 10% | Other | 98.2% |
| 2010 | TX | 2270 | 4.00 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 99.1% |
| 2010 | (Private) | 2270 | 3.95 | Top 2% | Caucasian | 99.5% |
| 2010 | TX | 2250 | 3.76 | Top 3% | Caucasian | 100.0% |
| 2010 | TX | 2250 | 3.98 | Top 3% | Caucasian | 99.6% |
| 2010 | TX | 2250 | 3.97 | Top 4% | East Asian | 99.5% |
| 2010 | TX | 2240 | 4.00 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 99.0% |
| 2010 | TX | 2230 | 3.91 | Top 4% | South Asian | 99.5% |
| 2010 | (Private) | 2230 | 3.81 | Top 3% | Hispanic | 99.7% |
| 2010 | KS | 2230 | 4.00 | Valedictorian | Caucasian | 98.5% |
| 2010 | TX | 2220 | 3.74 | Top 2% | East Asian | 99.3% |
| 2010 | TX | 2220 | 4.00 | Top 1% | Hispanic | 99.9% |
| 2010 | TX | 2210 | 3.80 | Top 10% | South Asian | 98.8% |
| 2010 | TX | 2210 | 4.00 | Top 2% | Caucasian | 99.5% |
| 2010 | CA | 2210 | 3.84 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 85.9% |
| 2010 | TX | 2210 | 3.76 | Top 10% | East Asian | 97.5% |
| 2010 | TX | 2210 | 3.97 | Top 3% | Caucasian | 100.0% |
| 2010 | SC | 2210 | 3.97 | Top 1% | Caucasian | 97.6% |
| 2010 | TX | 2190 | 3.23 | Top 35% | South Asian | 41.2% |
| 2010 | TX | 2180 | 4.00 | Top 5% | South Asian | 98.6% |
| 2010 | (Private) | 2160 | 3.93 | Valedictorian | Hispanic | 99.9% |
| 2010 | TX | 2140 | 3.90 | Top 2% | Caucasian | 99.2% |
| 2010 | TX | 2140 | 3.98 | Top 2% | East Asian | 98.9% |
| 2010 | TX | 2140 | 3.82 | Top 3% | East Asian | 98.7% |
| 2010 | TX | 2130 | 3.75 | Top 15% | Hispanic | 98.7% |
| 2010 | XX | 2130 | 3.75 | Class Not Ranked | East Asian | 74.2% |
| 2010 | (Private) | 2120 | 4.00 | Top 2% | Caucasian | 99.6% |
| 2010 | TX | 2120 | 4.00 | Top 1% | Hispanic | 99.9% |
| 2010 | TX | 2120 | 3.95 | Top 2% | Caucasian | 98.8% |
| 2010 | TX | 2120 | 3.77 | Top 4% | East Asian | 98.4% |
| 2010 | RI | 2100 | 3.90 | Top 3% | Caucasian | 94.2% |
| 2010 | TX | 2100 | 3.50 | Top 15% | East Asian | 90.8% |
| 2010 | TX | 2090 | 3.72 | Top 4% | Hispanic | 99.8% |
| 2010 | IN | 2080 | 4.00 | Valedictorian | Caucasian | 95.8% |
| 2010 | CA | 2080 | 3.69 | Top 10% | None Indicated | 83.0% |
| 2010 | PA | 2070 | 2.52 | Bottom 40% | Caucasian | 0.6% |
| 2010 | TX | 2070 | 3.70 | Top 3% | South Asian | 98.2% |
| 2010 | NH | 2070 | 3.73 | Top 10% | South Asian | 82.1% |
| 2010 | TX | 2070 | 3.95 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 97.4% |
| 2010 | NJ | 2060 | 3.76 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 46.2% |
| 2010 | IL | 2040 | 3.33 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 82.0% |
| 2010 | TN | 2000 | 3.72 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 59.3% |
| 2010 | TX | 1990 | 3.56 | Top 4% | Middle-Eastern | 98.0% |
| 2010 | TX | 1990 | 4.00 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 95.8% |
| 2010 | TX | 1990 | 3.57 | Top 10% | Hispanic | 98.8% |
| 2010 | (Private) | 1960 | 3.60 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 85.0% |
| 2010 | TX | 1940 | 3.50 | Top 25% | Hispanic | 92.0% |
| 2010 | TX | 1940 | 3.95 | Top 2% | Hispanic | 99.8% |
| 2010 | TX | 1910 | 3.90 | Top 4% | Caucasian | 96.9% |
| 2010 | TX | 1900 | 4.00 | Valedictorian | Caucasian | 97.6% |
| 2010 | XX | 1890 | 3.83 | Top 10% | East Asian | 61.4% |
| 2010 | TX | 1870 | 3.96 | Valedictorian | African-American | 99.5% |
| 2010 | TX | 1840 | 3.72 | Top 3% | Hispanic | 99.0% |
| 2010 | TX | 1840 | 3.82 | Top 2% | Caucasian | 94.3% |
| 2010 | TX | 1810 | 4.00 | Top 2% | Hispanic | 98.9% |
| 2010 | NY | 1770 | 3.40 | Class Not Ranked | Hispanic | 75.2% |
| 2010 | TX | 1600 | 4.00 | Valedictorian | Hispanic | 97.5% |
| 2010 | WA | 1500 | 3.10 | Top 30% | African-American | 5.4% |
| 2010 | TX | 35 | 3.92 | Top 4% | Caucasian | 99.5% |
| 2010 | TX | 34 | 3.96 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 99.1% |
| 2010 | TX | 34 | 3.60 | Top 15% | Caucasian | 96.1% |
| 2010 | CA | 32 | 3.50 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 75.5% |
| 2010 | NY | 31 | 3.94 | Class Not Ranked | East Asian | 65.9% |
| 2009 | TX | 2380 | 4.00 | Valedictorian | East Asian | 99.8% |
| 2009 | TX | 2380 | 4.00 | Valedictorian | Caucasian | 99.8% |
| 2009 | TX | 2350 | 3.96 | Top 5% | East Asian | 99.5% |
| 2009 | TX | 2350 | 4.00 | Top 1% | East Asian | 99.7% |
| 2009 | TX | 2340 | 3.20 | Top 5% | East Asian | 99.5% |
| 2009 | (Private) | 2340 | 3.85 | Class Not Ranked | South Asian | 97.3% |
| 2009 | TX | 2340 | 4.00 | Top 1% | South Asian | 99.7% |
| 2009 | TX | 2330 | 3.93 | Top 5% | East Asian | 99.4% |
| 2009 | TX | 2320 | 3.92 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 99.4% |
| 2009 | TX | 2310 | 3.80 | Top 5% | East Asian | 99.3% |
| 2009 | (Private) | 2310 | 3.99 | Top 5% | Hispanic | 99.9% |
| 2009 | TX | 2290 | 4.00 | Salutatorian | Caucasian | 99.7% |
| 2009 | TX | 2280 | 4.00 | Valedictorian | East Asian | 99.6% |
| 2009 | CA | 2260 | 3.99 | Top 5% | South Asian | 96.7% |
| 2009 | NY | 2250 | 3.50 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 86.0% |
| 2009 | TX | 2250 | 4.00 | Top 1% | None Indicated | 99.5% |
| 2009 | TX | 2240 | 3.87 | Top 1% | East Asian | 99.5% |
| 2009 | TX | 2240 | 3.50 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 98.0% |
| 2009 | XX | 2240 | 3.30 | Unknown | South Asian | 86.0% |
| 2009 | NJ | 2230 | 3.93 | Class Not Ranked | South Asian | 82.9% |
| 2009 | TX | 2220 | 3.46 | Top 5% | East Asian | 99.6% |
| 2009 | TX | 2210 | 3.71 | Top 20% | South Asian | 91.4% |
| 2009 | TX | 2200 | 3.38 | Top 5% | East Asian | 99.2% |
| 2009 | TX | 2200 | 3.83 | Top 30% | Caucasian | 100.0% |
| 2009 | NJ | 2200 | 3.64 | Top 10% | East Asian | 90.8% |
| 2009 | TX | 2190 | 3.92 | Top 1% | East Asian | 99.3% |
| 2009 | TX | 2190 | 4.00 | Top 1% | South Asian | 99.3% |
| 2009 | TX | 2190 | 3.40 | Top 20% | Hispanic | 98.1% |
| 2009 | CA | 2180 | 4.00 | Top 1% | Caucasian | 97.2% |
| 2009 | CA | 2160 | 3.60 | Unknown | Caucasian | 78.1% |
| 2009 | CA | 2130 | 3.66 | Class Not Ranked | East Asian | 74.7% |
| 2009 | TX | 2130 | 3.38 | Top 5% | East Asian | 98.4% |
| 2009 | TX | 2130 | 3.73 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 83.0% |
| 2009 | (Private) | 2130 | 4.00 | Valedictorian | Caucasian | 99.1% |
| 2009 | TX | 2130 | 4.00 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 98.1% |
| 2009 | (Private) | 2120 | 3.75 | Top 10% | South Asian | 96.1% |
| 2009 | TX | 2120 | 3.30 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 84.6% |
| 2009 | TX | 2120 | 4.00 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 98.0% |
| 2009 | TX | 2110 | 3.90 | Top 5% | East Asian | 97.9% |
| 2009 | TX | 2110 | 3.70 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 95.7% |
| 2009 | CA | 2110 | 3.31 | Class Not Ranked | East Asian | 74.2% |
| 2009 | TX | 2100 | 3.71 | Top 10% | None Indicated | 100.0% |
| 2009 | TX | 2080 | 3.75 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 96.1% |
| 2009 | FL | 2070 | 3.86 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 81.6% |
| 2009 | TX | 2060 | 3.63 | Top 5% | East Asian | 97.4% |
| 2009 | CA | 2050 | 3.80 | Class Not Ranked | South Asian | 64.1% |
| 2009 | NJ | 2040 | 3.71 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 63.4% |
| 2009 | XX | 2040 | 3.80 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 89.5% |
| 2009 | TX | 2030 | 4.00 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 98.6% |
| 2009 | TX | 2030 | 3.59 | Top 10% | East Asian | 93.5% |
| 2009 | TX | 2020 | 3.86 | Top 30% | Caucasian | 33.1% |
| 2009 | TX | 2010 | 3.60 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 100.0% |
| 2009 | TX | 2010 | 3.91 | Top 20% | South Asian | 70.0% |
| 2009 | KS | 2000 | 4.00 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 87.2% |
| 2009 | TX | 1990 | 3.77 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 96.1% |
| 2009 | TX | 1990 | 4.00 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 100.0% |
| 2009 | TX | 1980 | 4.00 | Salutatorian | Caucasian | 98.0% |
| 2009 | XX | 1980 | 3.80 | Top 10% | South Asian | 72.9% |
| 2009 | TX | 1980 | 3.82 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 95.8% |
| 2009 | TX | 1950 | 3.98 | Top 20% | East Asian | 61.9% |
| 2009 | TX | 1940 | 3.70 | Top 10% | African-American | 98.3% |
| 2009 | TX | 1900 | 3.60 | Top 20% | Hispanic | 94.7% |
| 2009 | TX | 1900 | 3.50 | Top 20% | East Asian | 58.0% |
| 2009 | TX | 1590 | 3.30 | Top 30% | Hispanic | 34.4% |
| 2009 | CT | 35 | 3.67 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 81.4% |
| 2009 | NE | 34 | 4.00 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 96.7% |
| 2009 | TX | 33 | 3.40 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 88.3% |
| 2009 | TX | 33 | 3.75 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 97.2% |
| 2009 | IL | 32 | 3.32 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 76.4% |
| 2009 | (Private) | 32 | 3.57 | Class Not Ranked | East Asian | 92.0% |
| 2009 | (Private) | 31 | 3.80 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 77.3% |
| 2009 | MI | 31 | 3.52 | Class Not Ranked | South Asian | 68.4% |
| 2009 | TX | 30 | 3.89 | Top 10% | South Asian | 92.2% |
| 2009 | DC | 29 | 3.70 | Top 10% | None Indicated | 69.9% |
| 2009 | NM | 28 | 3.87 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 100.0% |
| 2008 | (Private) | 2340 | 4.00 | Salutatorian | Caucasian | 99.7% |
| 2008 | TX | 2340 | 3.93 | Top 1% | Caucasian | 99.7% |
| 2008 | (Private) | 2320 | 4.00 | Top 1% | South Asian | 99.7% |
| 2008 | TX | 2310 | 4.00 | Salutatorian | East Asian | 99.7% |
| 2008 | TX | 2310 | 3.59 | Top 5% | East Asian | 99.4% |
| 2008 | TX | 2270 | 3.75 | Top 1% | East Asian | 99.6% |
| 2008 | TX | 2260 | 4.00 | Top 20% | None Indicated | 90.5% |
| 2008 | TX | 2230 | 3.95 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 98.9% |
| 2008 | TX | 2230 | 3.70 | Unknown | East Asian | 95.1% |
| 2008 | TX | 2200 | 3.88 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 97.2% |
| 2008 | TX | 2170 | 4.00 | Class Not Ranked | East Asian | 97.2% |
| 2008 | TX | 2170 | 4.00 | Valedictorian | Caucasian | 99.3% |
| 2008 | TX | 2160 | 4.00 | Salutatorian | East Asian | 99.7% |
| 2008 | TX | 2160 | 3.96 | Top 5% | East Asian | 98.7% |
| 2008 | TX | 2090 | 3.55 | Top 20% | Hispanic | 96.6% |
| 2008 | TX | 1930 | 3.70 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 89.8% |
| 2008 | TX | 1920 | 4.00 | Salutatorian | Caucasian | 98.8% |
| 2008 | SC | 1750 | 3.90 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 60.9% |
| 2008 | TX | 1200 | 3.97 | Top 1% | Hispanic | 99.0% |
| 2007 | TX | 2180 | 4.00 | Top 5% | Other | 98.6% |
| 2007 | TX | 2050 | 4.00 | Top 1% | South Asian | 98.4% |
| 2007 | TX | 2020 | 3.70 | Top 10% | Hispanic | 99.4% |
| 2007 | TX | 1990 | 4.00 | Top 10% | Middle-Eastern | 91.1% |
| 2006 | TX | 2030 | 3.80 | Top 10% | Other | 93.2% |
| 2006 | TX | 1880 | 4.00 | Top 1% | Hispanic | 99.4% |
| 2005 | TX | 2390 | 4.00 | Top 5% | East Asian | 99.6% |
| 2003 | TX | 1960 | 3.78 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 94.5% |
| 2001 | TN | 1310 | 3.60 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 72.3% |
|
|
| 2011 | TX | 1900 | 3.34 | Top 40% | South Asian | 5.4% |
| 2010 | TX | 2350 | 2.70 | Top 40% | East Asian | 47.3% |
| 2010 | TX | 2250 | 4.00 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 95.3% |
| 2010 | TX | 2210 | 3.87 | Unknown | Hispanic | 99.6% |
| 2010 | TX | 2180 | 3.10 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 94.6% |
| 2010 | TX | 2120 | 3.84 | Unknown | East Asian | 91.4% |
| 2010 | TX | 2120 | 3.50 | Top 25% | South Asian | 68.8% |
| 2010 | CA | 2040 | 3.38 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 65.5% |
| 2010 | XX | 1990 | 3.91 | Salutatorian | East Asian | 93.3% |
| 2010 | CA | 1960 | 3.92 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 50.7% |
| 2010 | TX | 1920 | 3.60 | Top 25% | Caucasian | 53.1% |
| 2010 | MD | 1870 | 3.57 | Top 30% | Caucasian | 5.6% |
| 2010 | TX | 1830 | 3.83 | Top 30% | None Indicated | 99.9% |
| 2010 | AZ | 1820 | 3.82 | Top 15% | Hispanic | 76.9% |
| 2010 | GA | 1710 | 3.54 | Top 30% | Hispanic | 32.1% |
| 2010 | XX | 1690 | 3.00 | Class Not Ranked | South Asian | 21.8% |
| 2010 | NJ | 1670 | 3.08 | Class Not Ranked | South Asian | 19.8% |
| 2010 | GA | 1650 | 3.72 | Top 15% | Hispanic | 56.1% |
| 2010 | TX | 29 | 3.40 | Bottom 50% | East Asian | 1.5% |
| 2010 | TX | 28 | 3.15 | Top 25% | Caucasian | 39.1% |
| 2010 | CA | 24 | 3.63 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 99.6% |
| 2009 | TX | 2180 | 3.80 | Top 20% | Other | 86.5% |
| 2009 | XX | 2150 | 3.70 | Top 1% | East Asian | 96.9% |
| 2009 | TX | 2030 | 3.97 | Top 20% | South Asian | 72.2% |
| 2009 | TX | 2000 | 3.92 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 76.7% |
| 2009 | TX | 2000 | 3.94 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 83.2% |
| 2009 | (Private) | 1990 | 3.86 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 67.7% |
| 2009 | TX | 1980 | 3.65 | Top 30% | Caucasian | 33.2% |
| 2009 | CA | 1970 | 3.27 | Class Not Ranked | East Asian | 56.8% |
| 2009 | TX | 1950 | 3.56 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 78.4% |
| 2009 | XX | 1890 | 3.50 | Unknown | East Asian | 43.7% |
| 2009 | MN | 1860 | 3.70 | Top 10% | East Asian | 58.1% |
| 2009 | (Private) | 1790 | 3.45 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 30.8% |
| 2009 | (Private) | 1670 | 3.76 | Top 30% | Caucasian | 6.4% |
| 2009 | TX | 1650 | 3.14 | Top 40% | African-American | 9.1% |
| 2009 | LA | 1410 | 3.85 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 92.8% |
| 2008 | OH | 2160 | 3.42 | Top 20% | South Asian | 62.5% |
| 2008 | TX | 2090 | 3.55 | Top 40% | Caucasian | 13.9% |
| 2008 | XX | 1940 | 3.90 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 29.4% |
| 2008 | (Private) | 1760 | 3.84 | Top 20% | East Asian | 36.3% |
| 2008 | NJ | 1630 | 3.08 | Bottom 40% | Caucasian | 0.0% |
| 2008 | FL | 31 | 3.40 | Top 20% | Hispanic | 87.4% |
| 2008 | (Private) | 28 | 3.50 | Top 30% | South Asian | 6.4% |
| 2007 | VA | 1940 | 3.27 | Unknown | South Asian | 52.5% |
| |