University of Tampa Applications and Decisions
Below is a list of applicants who have demonstrated interest in University of Tampa. Our best formula
for this college is based on
18 members who were accepted or rejected. The formula
has a college admissions prediction accuracy of
89%?.
Because not all members have filled out the most recent version of our survey, some predictions are made based on
less-accurate models. Those are noted with an asterisk (*) next to their prediction.
|
| 2010 | FL | 2270 | 3.93 | Top 2% | Caucasian | 100.0% |
| 2010 | NH | 2030 | 3.60 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 100.0% |
| 2010 | NJ | 1960 | 3.48 | Top 25% | Caucasian | 100.0% |
| 2010 | VA | 1960 | 3.80 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 100.0% |
| 2010 | MD | 1870 | 3.57 | Top 30% | Caucasian | 100.0% |
| 2010 | MA | 1810 | 3.76 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 100.0% |
| 2010 | MA | 1760 | 2.80 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 23.7% |
| 2010 | MA | 1730 | 3.60 | Top 25% | Caucasian | 100.0% |
| 2010 | FL | 1720 | 3.20 | Unknown | Hispanic | 94.6% |
| 2010 | FL | 1710 | 3.53 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 99.7% |
| 2010 | NY | 1690 | 3.40 | Unknown | Caucasian | 98.9% |
| 2010 | NJ | 1660 | 2.60 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 0.4% |
| 2010 | (Private) | 1640 | 3.85 | Top 3% | Caucasian | 100.0% |
| 2010 | FL | 1620 | 3.30 | Top 25% | Hispanic | 96.7% |
| 2010 | NJ | 1620 | 2.75 | Bottom 40% | Caucasian | 99.9% |
| 2010 | RI | 1610 | 2.80 | Top 35% | East Asian | 26.9% |
| 2010 | NY | 1600 | 3.00 | Unknown | Caucasian | 0.6% |
| 2010 | (Private) | 1600 | 3.20 | Class Not Ranked | Hispanic | 10.2% |
| 2010 | NY | 1510 | 3.27 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 0.7% |
| 2010 | FL | 1390 | 3.20 | Unknown | Caucasian | 0.1% |
| 2010 | XX | 1160 | 2.72 | Unknown | None Indicated | 0.0% |
| 2010 | TN | 22 | 3.10 | Bottom 40% | Caucasian | 100.0% |
| 2009 | FL | 2120 | 3.65 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 100.0% |
| 2009 | MA | 1900 | 3.12 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 100.0% |
| 2009 | (Private) | 1880 | 3.42 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 100.0% |
| 2009 | FL | 1830 | 3.38 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 100.0% |
| 2009 | VA | 1820 | 3.20 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 99.9% |
| 2009 | CT | 1750 | 3.18 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 99.6% |
| 2009 | (Private) | 1710 | 2.99 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 36.4% |
| 2009 | MA | 1680 | 3.30 | Top 30% | Caucasian | 100.0% |
| 2009 | NJ | 1670 | 3.20 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 92.2% |
| 2009 | NY | 1080 | 3.90 | Top 1% | Hispanic | 98.7% |
| 2009 | OH | 28 | 3.92 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 100.0% |
| 2008 | FL | 1810 | 3.50 | Unknown | Caucasian | 100.0% |
| 2007 | NY | 1860 | 3.20 | Top 40% | Caucasian | 100.0% |
| 2007 | PR | 1740 | 3.06 | Class Not Ranked | Hispanic | 84.8% |
|
| 2009 | NJ | 1510 | 3.30 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 1.1% |
| 2008 | FL | 1350 | 3.20 | Top 40% | Hispanic | 1.0% |
|
|
| 2010 | MA | 1650 | 2.50 | Unknown | Caucasian | 0.0% |
| 2010 | CT | 1380 | 2.78 | Unknown | Caucasian | 0.0% |
| 2009 | PA | 1380 | 2.90 | Unknown | Caucasian | 0.0% |
| 2009 | GA | 1350 | 3.40 | Top 30% | African-American | 0.8% |
| 2008 | MD | 1580 | 3.40 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 49.2% |
|
| 2010 | NY | 1840 | 3.40 | Class Not Ranked | Other | 100.0% |
| 2010 | GA | 1820 | 3.60 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 100.0% |
| 2010 | CT | 1600 | 3.50 | Top 15% | Caucasian | 99.3% |
| 2010 | OK | 1480 | 3.80 | Unknown | Caucasian | 81.5% |
| 2010 | FL | 1140 | 3.33 | Bottom 40% | African-American | 87.2% |
| 2009 | PA | 1790 | 2.90 | Top 40% | Caucasian | 100.0% |
| 2009 | MD | 1670 | 3.70 | Top 10% | African-American | 100.0% |
| 2009 | FL | 1510 | 3.25 | Top 40% | Caucasian | 94.6% |
| 2009 | NJ | 1240 | 3.48 | Top 40% | Caucasian | 0.6% |
| 2009 | MD | 28 | 3.81 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 100.0% |
| 2008 | MD | 1740 | 2.75 | Class Not Ranked | None Indicated | 5.9% |
| 2008 | CA | 1590 | 3.00 | Class Not Ranked | African-American | 0.4% |
| 2008 | PA | 1540 | 3.50 | Top 35% | Caucasian | 99.8% |
| 2008 | GA | 1520 | 3.50 | Top 20% | African-American | 62.6% |
| 2008 | CT | 1430 | 2.30 | Unknown | None Indicated | 0.0% |
| 2008 | NY | 26 | 2.88 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 73.1% |
| 2008 | (Private) | 16 | 3.30 | Bottom 50% | Caucasian | 0.1% |
|
| 2012 | FL | 2190 | 3.67 | Top 15% | Caucasian | 100.0% |
| 2012 | NJ | 1700 | 3.10 | Top 20% | Hispanic | 90.7% |
| 2012 | FL | 1350 | 3.45 | Bottom 50% | Caucasian | 91.0% |
| 2011 | NJ | 1500 | 2.58 | Unknown | Caucasian | 0.0% |
| 2011 | VA | 1470 | 3.25 | Top 40% | Caucasian | 100.0% |
| 2010 | FL | 2400 | 3.20 | Unknown | Caucasian | 100.0% |
| 2010 | MA | 2340 | 3.90 | Top 2% | Caucasian | 100.0% |
| 2010 | ME | 2140 | 3.92 | Top 1% | Caucasian | 100.0% |
| 2010 | FL | 2000 | 3.95 | Top 1% | Caucasian | 100.0% |
| 2010 | KS | 1990 | 3.00 | Unknown | Caucasian | 100.0% |
| 2010 | TX | 1940 | 3.96 | Salutatorian | Caucasian | 100.0% |
| 2010 | FL | 1890 | 3.71 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 100.0% |
| 2010 | FL | 1890 | 3.70 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 100.0% |
| 2010 | GA | 1840 | 3.20 | Unknown | East Asian | 100.0% |
| 2010 | XX | 1800 | 3.70 | Class Not Ranked | Hispanic | 100.0% |
| 2010 | NJ | 1800 | 3.05 | Class Not Ranked | African-American | 98.4% |
| 2010 | IN | 1730 | 3.15 | Top 25% | Caucasian | 99.7% |
| 2010 | FL | 1720 | 3.00 | Top 10% | Hispanic | 16.1% |
| 2010 | MA | 1680 | 3.00 | Top 30% | Caucasian | 96.0% |
| 2010 | NJ | 1660 | 2.50 | Bottom 50% | Caucasian | 98.7% |
| 2010 | NY | 1620 | 3.30 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 53.9% |
| 2010 | OH | 1580 | 2.60 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 0.0% |
| 2010 | FL | 1560 | 3.63 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 100.0% |
| 2010 | NH | 1540 | 3.20 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 0.9% |
| 2010 | NJ | 1530 | 3.40 | Unknown | Hispanic | 10.2% |
| 2010 | GA | 1500 | 2.70 | Bottom 40% | Caucasian | 99.5% |
| 2010 | NJ | 1470 | 2.70 | Bottom 30% | Caucasian | 95.1% |
| 2010 | MA | 1390 | 3.40 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 0.2% |
| 2010 | FL | 1300 | 2.85 | Top 25% | African-American | 0.0% |
| 2010 | FL | 1300 | 2.70 | Top 25% | African-American | 0.0% |
| 2010 | PR | 1280 | 3.20 | Unknown | Hispanic | 0.0% |
| 2010 | NY | 1250 | 3.00 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 0.0% |
| 2010 | PA | 1200 | 2.10 | Unknown | Caucasian | 0.0% |
| 2010 | MN | 27 | 3.04 | Top 40% | Caucasian | 100.0% |
| 2010 | FL | 25 | 3.00 | Top 25% | African-American | 96.9% |
| 2010 | TX | 23 | 3.10 | Bottom 50% | Caucasian | 100.0% |
| 2010 | NY | 22 | 3.40 | Top 35% | Hispanic | 99.3% |
| 2010 | FL | 21 | 3.50 | Top 30% | Hispanic | 90.4% |
| 2010 | FL | 20 | 3.50 | Top 5% | Hispanic | 0.0% |
| 2009 | MA | 2340 | 2.70 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 100.0% |
| 2009 | MA | 2340 | 2.90 | Unknown | Caucasian | 100.0% |
| 2009 | MA | 2340 | 2.90 | Unknown | Caucasian | 100.0% |
| 2009 | FL | 2270 | 3.81 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 100.0% |
| 2009 | NY | 2100 | 4.00 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 100.0% |
| 2009 | NJ | 2080 | 3.20 | Top 30% | Caucasian | 100.0% |
| 2009 | TX | 1950 | 3.65 | Unknown | None Indicated | 100.0% |
| 2009 | FL | 1920 | 3.13 | Top 20% | Hispanic | 100.0% |
| 2009 | RI | 1910 | 2.95 | Unknown | Caucasian | 99.9% |
| 2009 | FL | 1880 | 3.64 | Top 20% | Hispanic | 100.0% |
| 2009 | PA | 1770 | 3.50 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 100.0% |
| 2009 | NJ | 1760 | 2.08 | Unknown | Caucasian | 0.0% |
| 2009 | CA | 1740 | 2.96 | Class Not Ranked | East Asian | 56.7% |
| 2009 | MA | 1700 | 2.80 | Unknown | Caucasian | 2.4% |
| 2009 | MA | 1700 | 2.80 | Unknown | Caucasian | 2.4% |
| 2009 | MA | 1650 | 2.66 | Unknown | Caucasian | 0.0% |
| 2009 | MA | 1650 | 2.64 | Unknown | Caucasian | 0.0% |
| 2009 | FL | 1630 | 3.55 | Top 30% | Caucasian | 100.0% |
| 2009 | CT | 1620 | 3.79 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 99.9% |
| 2009 | MA | 1610 | 3.60 | Top 30% | Caucasian | 100.0% |
| 2009 | XX | 1350 | 3.70 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 100.0% |
| 2009 | IL | 29 | 2.50 | Unknown | Caucasian | 91.9% |
| 2009 | TN | 27 | 3.20 | Unknown | Caucasian | 99.9% |
| 2009 | MO | 26 | 3.50 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 100.0% |
| 2009 | VT | 26 | 3.70 | Top 20% | None Indicated | 100.0% |
| 2009 | FL | 25 | 3.17 | Top 40% | Caucasian | 100.0% |
| 2009 | MO | 24 | 3.46 | Unknown | Caucasian | 98.7% |
| 2009 | IL | 24 | 3.50 | Top 20% | South Asian | 99.9% |
| 2008 | MA | 2050 | 3.30 | Unknown | Caucasian | 100.0% |
| 2008 | MA | 1910 | 3.14 | Top 40% | None Indicated | 100.0% |
| 2008 | NY | 1740 | 3.65 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 100.0% |
| 2008 | MA | 1690 | 3.20 | Top 20% | African-American | 99.9% |
| 2008 | FL | 1610 | 3.30 | Unknown | Caucasian | 44.5% |
| 2008 | FL | 1610 | 3.30 | Unknown | African-American | 44.5% |
| 2008 | CA | 1590 | 3.00 | Unknown | African-American | 0.4% |
| 2008 | PA | 1560 | 2.90 | Unknown | Caucasian | 0.0% |
| 2008 | FL | 1510 | 3.28 | Top 20% | African-American | 4.0% |
| 2008 | FL | 1450 | 3.50 | Unknown | Hispanic | 1.6% |
| 2008 | MO | 22 | 3.40 | Unknown | Caucasian | 17.6% |
| |