Brandeis University Applications and Decisions
Below is a list of applicants who have demonstrated interest in Brandeis University. Our best formula
for this college is based on
85 members who were accepted or rejected. The formula
has a college admissions prediction accuracy of
91%?.
Because not all members have filled out the most recent version of our survey, some predictions are made based on
less-accurate models. Those are noted with an asterisk (*) next to their prediction.
This is a very popular school, so we're only showing you profiles that have received an admissions decision. If you
want to see all applicants to this school,
click here (caution: the page will take awhile to load).
|
| 2009 | MA | 2090 | 3.58 | Class Not Ranked | East Asian | 100.0% |
| 2009 | TX | 2080 | 2.54 | Bottom 40% | Caucasian | 92.5% |
| 2009 | NY | 2070 | 3.40 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 72.5% |
| 2009 | CT | 1990 | 3.79 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 79.6% |
| 2009 | FL | 1750 | 3.70 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 39.1% |
| 2009 | MA | 1750 | 3.63 | Top 10% | East Asian | 99.9% |
| 2009 | TX | 33 | 3.75 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 94.9% |
| 2009 | IL | 31 | 3.64 | Class Not Ranked | East Asian | 91.4% |
| 2008 | MD | 2040 | 3.65 | Top 20% | African-American | 95.2% |
| 2008 | HI | 31 | 3.50 | Class Not Ranked | Hispanic | 82.5% |
| 1999 | MA | 1380 | 3.60 | Unknown | East Asian | 100.0% |
|
| 2010 | XX | 1620 | 3.33 | Class Not Ranked | East Asian | 13.7% |
| 2009 | MA | 2390 | 3.62 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 100.0% |
| 2009 | NJ | 2370 | 4.00 | Valedictorian | Caucasian | 98.0% |
| 2009 | NH | 2350 | 3.51 | Top 10% | Middle-Eastern | 91.5% |
| 2009 | MA | 2340 | 4.00 | Valedictorian | Caucasian | 100.0% |
| 2009 | (Private) | 2340 | 4.00 | Top 1% | None Indicated | 98.0% |
| 2009 | MA | 2330 | 3.89 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 100.0% |
| 2009 | MA | 2300 | 3.84 | Top 5% | East Asian | 100.0% |
| 2009 | KY | 2300 | 3.66 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 90.7% |
| 2009 | NY | 2300 | 3.84 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 99.2% |
| 2009 | NJ | 2280 | 3.81 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 98.9% |
| 2009 | CT | 2270 | 3.60 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 98.1% |
| 2009 | (Private) | 2220 | 4.00 | Valedictorian | Caucasian | 96.6% |
| 2009 | (Private) | 2200 | 3.90 | Class Not Ranked | East Asian | 99.0% |
| 2009 | XX | 2160 | 3.95 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 98.1% |
| 2009 | CA | 2140 | 3.70 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 95.6% |
| 2009 | NH | 2140 | 3.89 | Top 5% | Hispanic | 94.0% |
| 2009 | PA | 2120 | 3.46 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 83.8% |
| 2009 | CA | 2110 | 3.93 | Top 1% | South Asian | 95.6% |
| 2009 | FL | 2110 | 3.91 | Top 1% | East Asian | 90.3% |
| 2009 | MA | 2110 | 3.30 | Top 40% | Caucasian | 100.0% |
| 2009 | NJ | 2110 | 4.00 | Valedictorian | Caucasian | 92.4% |
| 2009 | FL | 2040 | 3.70 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 96.9% |
| 2009 | PA | 2040 | 3.67 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 92.7% |
| 2009 | CA | 2040 | 3.69 | Unknown | Caucasian | 92.4% |
| 2009 | XX | 1980 | 3.80 | Top 10% | South Asian | 89.0% |
| 2009 | NY | 1970 | 3.60 | Top 10% | Hispanic | 70.8% |
| 2009 | NY | 1940 | 4.00 | Top 10% | None Indicated | 98.3% |
| 2009 | CA | 1910 | 3.70 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 84.2% |
| 2009 | XX | 1880 | 3.80 | Class Not Ranked | South Asian | 91.2% |
| 2009 | FL | 1870 | 3.75 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 62.0% |
| 2009 | CT | 1810 | 3.57 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 46.1% |
| 2009 | CA | 32 | 3.40 | Class Not Ranked | Hispanic | 78.4% |
| 2009 | IL | 31 | 3.85 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 98.7% |
| 2008 | CT | 2380 | 3.96 | Top 1% | Caucasian | 97.9% |
| 2008 | CT | 2370 | 3.98 | Top 1% | Caucasian | 98.1% |
| 2008 | NJ | 2340 | 3.92 | Class Not Ranked | None Indicated | 99.6% |
| 2008 | MA | 2340 | 3.10 | Unknown | Hispanic | 100.0% |
| 2008 | NY | 2280 | 3.80 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 95.1% |
| 2008 | NY | 2270 | 3.91 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 97.3% |
| 2008 | NY | 2250 | 4.00 | Salutatorian | South Asian | 96.6% |
| 2008 | NV | 2240 | 4.00 | Salutatorian | Caucasian | 96.1% |
| 2008 | MA | 2230 | 3.92 | Top 1% | Caucasian | 100.0% |
| 2008 | NJ | 2220 | 4.00 | Top 1% | Caucasian | 96.2% |
| 2008 | NY | 2170 | 4.00 | Top 5% | None Indicated | 97.2% |
| 2008 | VA | 2140 | 3.89 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 97.0% |
| 2008 | NY | 2130 | 3.89 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 99.2% |
| 2008 | (Private) | 2120 | 3.94 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 98.8% |
| 2008 | TX | 2120 | 4.00 | Salutatorian | Hispanic | 92.9% |
| 2008 | VA | 2110 | 3.70 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 97.5% |
| 2008 | CA | 2100 | 3.95 | Top 1% | Caucasian | 91.0% |
| 2008 | XX | 2070 | 4.00 | Unknown | Hispanic | 98.9% |
| 2008 | NJ | 2060 | 3.81 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 96.5% |
| 2008 | NY | 2060 | 3.70 | Unknown | Middle-Eastern | 93.5% |
| 2008 | NY | 1770 | 4.00 | Unknown | Hispanic | 96.0% |
| 2008 | XX | 1740 | 4.00 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 77.8% |
| 2008 | NY | 28 | 4.00 | Class Not Ranked | African-American | 97.1% |
| 2007 | PA | 2170 | 4.00 | Top 1% | Caucasian | 95.1% |
| 2007 | MA | 2140 | 3.80 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 100.0% |
| 2007 | VT | 2030 | 4.00 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 94.3% |
| 2006 | PA | 2210 | 3.96 | Top 5% | South Asian | 97.2% |
| 2002 | IL | 34 | 3.86 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 96.2% |
|
|
|
| 2009 | XX | 1970 | 4.00 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 92.3% |
| 2009 | NY | 1810 | 3.00 | Unknown | Hispanic | 6.7% |
| 2009 | (Private) | 28 | 3.25 | Top 25% | African-American | 64.2% |
| 2008 | XX | 2180 | 3.50 | Top 1% | South Asian | 53.1% |
| 2008 | XX | 2050 | 4.00 | Top 10% | South Asian | 97.4% |
| 2008 | XX | 1830 | 3.80 | Top 5% | South Asian | 63.9% |
| 2007 | XX | 2080 | 3.33 | Top 10% | South Asian | 47.3% |
| 2007 | MN | 21 | 3.80 | Top 1% | Caucasian | 13.6% |
| 2006 | MD | 2160 | 3.69 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 91.8% |
| |