University of Notre Dame Applications and Decisions
Below is a list of applicants who have demonstrated interest in University of Notre Dame. Our best formula
for this college is based on
149 members who were accepted or rejected. The formula
has a college admissions prediction accuracy of
86%?.
Because not all members have filled out the most recent version of our survey, some predictions are made based on
less-accurate models. Those are noted with an asterisk (*) next to their prediction.
This is a very popular school, so we're only showing you profiles that have received an admissions decision. If you
want to see all applicants to this school,
click here (caution: the page will take awhile to load).
|
| 2010 | OH | 2210 | 3.85 | Top 3% | Caucasian | 96.6% |
| 2010 | NJ | 2200 | 4.00 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 52.7% |
| 2010 | IN | 2150 | 3.85 | Top 3% | Caucasian | 73.1% |
| 2010 | CT | 1850 | 2.80 | Unknown | Caucasian | 1.3% |
| 2010 | UT | 34 | 3.87 | Valedictorian | Caucasian | 92.2% |
| 2009 | IN | 2280 | 3.92 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 54.8% |
| 2009 | NE | 2270 | 4.00 | Top 1% | Caucasian | 92.6% |
| 2009 | VA | 2240 | 3.76 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 96.4% |
| 2009 | NV | 2230 | 4.00 | Top 1% | Hispanic | 99.1% |
| 2009 | RI | 2170 | 3.95 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 73.4% |
| 2009 | NY | 2170 | 4.00 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 74.2% |
| 2009 | NJ | 2140 | 3.85 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 65.4% |
| 2009 | FL | 2100 | 3.30 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 18.7% |
| 2009 | NY | 2100 | 4.00 | Top 5% | None Indicated | 59.8% |
| 2009 | PA | 2090 | 3.97 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 91.9% |
| 2009 | VA | 2080 | 3.80 | Top 10% | None Indicated | 76.3% |
| 2009 | NY | 2050 | 3.80 | Top 1% | Caucasian | 94.1% |
| 2009 | FL | 1990 | 3.90 | Top 1% | Hispanic | 91.0% |
| 2009 | IL | 32 | 3.75 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 61.3% |
| 2009 | MI | 32 | 3.95 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 65.5% |
| 2008 | MA | 2210 | 3.56 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 60.9% |
| 2008 | (Private) | 2180 | 4.00 | Valedictorian | Caucasian | 85.7% |
| 2008 | MD | 2120 | 3.85 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 73.0% |
| 2008 | PA | 32 | 4.00 | Valedictorian | Caucasian | 78.6% |
| 2008 | IL | 30 | 3.84 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 13.7% |
| 2007 | CA | 1950 | 3.88 | Top 10% | East Asian | 14.6% |
| 2006 | TX | 2130 | 4.00 | Class Not Ranked | Hispanic | 88.3% |
|
| 2010 | FL | 2390 | 3.80 | Class Not Ranked | Hispanic | 98.7% |
| 2010 | CO | 2370 | 3.90 | Class Not Ranked | East Asian | 83.9% |
| 2010 | PA | 2340 | 3.94 | Salutatorian | Caucasian | 96.3% |
| 2010 | OH | 2300 | 3.95 | Top 2% | Caucasian | 93.4% |
| 2010 | OH | 2300 | 4.00 | Salutatorian | Caucasian | 95.0% |
| 2010 | TX | 2290 | 4.00 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 83.0% |
| 2010 | MD | 2280 | 4.00 | Top 2% | Caucasian | 92.3% |
| 2010 | NJ | 2260 | 3.95 | Top 5% | East Asian | 86.7% |
| 2010 | AZ | 2240 | 4.00 | Top 1% | Caucasian | 92.2% |
| 2010 | NJ | 2240 | 4.00 | Class Not Ranked | Other | 62.5% |
| 2010 | PA | 2240 | 3.76 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 82.2% |
| 2010 | MD | 2200 | 3.95 | Class Not Ranked | Other | 51.6% |
| 2010 | IL | 2170 | 3.79 | Class Not Ranked | South Asian | 40.9% |
| 2010 | OH | 2150 | 3.85 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 64.6% |
| 2010 | NJ | 2150 | 3.90 | Top 4% | Caucasian | 71.5% |
| 2010 | MO | 2120 | 3.98 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 50.1% |
| 2010 | FL | 2110 | 3.94 | Top 1% | Caucasian | 84.5% |
| 2010 | TN | 2100 | 3.62 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 96.8% |
| 2010 | CA | 2070 | 3.92 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 49.9% |
| 2010 | TX | 2060 | 3.65 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 84.0% |
| 2010 | IN | 2040 | 4.00 | Top 4% | Caucasian | 79.9% |
| 2010 | CO | 1950 | 3.99 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 36.3% |
| 2010 | MA | 1920 | 3.20 | Top 30% | African-American | 9.3% |
| 2010 | (Private) | 1870 | 3.80 | Top 10% | Hispanic | 97.5% |
| 2010 | TX | 1870 | 3.96 | Valedictorian | African-American | 79.3% |
| 2010 | PA | 1450 | 4.00 | Top 1% | Caucasian | 96.7% |
| 2010 | IL | 36 | 4.00 | Valedictorian | Caucasian | 98.0% |
| 2010 | MI | 34 | 3.99 | Salutatorian | Caucasian | 93.0% |
| 2010 | MI | 34 | 3.94 | Top 3% | Caucasian | 89.7% |
| 2010 | (Private) | 34 | 3.69 | Top 10% | East Asian | 74.6% |
| 2010 | IL | 33 | 4.00 | Valedictorian | Caucasian | 86.7% |
| 2010 | TX | 32 | 3.80 | Class Not Ranked | East Asian | 32.5% |
| 2009 | MO | 2390 | 4.00 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 97.6% |
| 2009 | TX | 2370 | 3.60 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 92.6% |
| 2009 | TX | 2280 | 4.00 | Salutatorian | Caucasian | 93.9% |
| 2009 | NJ | 2270 | 3.91 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 93.2% |
| 2009 | (Private) | 2270 | 4.00 | Valedictorian | Other | 93.4% |
| 2009 | MA | 2270 | 4.00 | Salutatorian | Caucasian | 93.4% |
| 2009 | (Private) | 2270 | 3.75 | Top 5% | Native American | 98.8% |
| 2009 | (Private) | 2260 | 4.00 | Valedictorian | Caucasian | 92.7% |
| 2009 | PA | 2260 | 3.63 | Top 1% | Caucasian | 88.9% |
| 2009 | CA | 2260 | 3.58 | Top 10% | South Asian | 71.5% |
| 2009 | XX | 2250 | 3.88 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 75.1% |
| 2009 | IL | 2220 | 3.75 | Top 5% | East Asian | 92.2% |
| 2009 | OH | 2200 | 3.91 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 88.0% |
| 2009 | ME | 2200 | 3.80 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 85.8% |
| 2009 | PA | 2190 | 3.80 | Unknown | Hispanic | 91.8% |
| 2009 | PA | 2190 | 3.80 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 74.6% |
| 2009 | RI | 2190 | 3.93 | Salutatorian | Caucasian | 86.0% |
| 2009 | AR | 2180 | 4.00 | Top 10% | Hispanic | 95.8% |
| 2009 | XX | 2170 | 3.90 | Top 1% | Hispanic | 99.7% |
| 2009 | CA | 2170 | 4.00 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 77.9% |
| 2009 | VA | 2170 | 3.92 | Top 5% | Hispanic | 97.2% |
| 2009 | OH | 2160 | 4.00 | Top 2% | Caucasian | 98.4% |
| 2009 | OH | 2160 | 3.99 | Top 1% | None Indicated | 85.1% |
| 2009 | CO | 2130 | 3.74 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 86.3% |
| 2009 | OH | 2120 | 4.00 | Valedictorian | Caucasian | 97.5% |
| 2009 | FL | 2110 | 3.91 | Top 1% | East Asian | 75.0% |
| 2009 | VA | 2100 | 3.60 | Unknown | East Asian | 23.1% |
| 2009 | NC | 2090 | 4.00 | Top 1% | East Asian | 76.5% |
| 2009 | (Private) | 2090 | 3.70 | Class Not Ranked | East Asian | 23.2% |
| 2009 | XX | 2060 | 3.97 | Top 1% | East Asian | 62.1% |
| 2009 | FL | 2050 | 3.90 | Salutatorian | African-American | 95.3% |
| 2009 | OH | 2040 | 4.00 | Top 1% | Other | 92.2% |
| 2009 | TX | 1990 | 3.70 | Top 20% | African-American | 44.5% |
| 2009 | OH | 1870 | 3.37 | Class Not Ranked | Hispanic | 88.3% |
| 2009 | MA | 1580 | 3.75 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 82.0% |
| 2009 | (Private) | 35 | 4.00 | Valedictorian | Caucasian | 96.5% |
| 2009 | VA | 33 | 3.80 | Valedictorian | Caucasian | 97.0% |
| 2009 | IL | 33 | 3.60 | Top 5% | East Asian | 71.0% |
| 2009 | (Private) | 33 | 3.97 | Top 1% | None Indicated | 84.9% |
| 2009 | IL | 28 | 3.90 | Top 5% | African-American | 70.5% |
| 2008 | MI | 2360 | 4.00 | Valedictorian | None Indicated | 97.1% |
| 2008 | (Private) | 2360 | 3.86 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 89.6% |
| 2008 | (Private) | 2340 | 4.00 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 93.7% |
| 2008 | MA | 2290 | 4.00 | Top 1% | Caucasian | 93.7% |
| 2008 | GA | 2240 | 4.00 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 85.1% |
| 2008 | NC | 2210 | 3.80 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 85.8% |
| 2008 | IL | 2200 | 3.95 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 78.6% |
| 2008 | VA | 2190 | 3.80 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 61.3% |
| 2008 | TX | 2170 | 4.00 | Valedictorian | Caucasian | 84.2% |
| 2008 | CA | 2160 | 3.97 | Top 1% | South Asian | 80.8% |
| 2008 | NY | 2150 | 3.80 | Top 1% | None Indicated | 76.8% |
| 2008 | CA | 2130 | 4.00 | Salutatorian | Caucasian | 78.6% |
| 2008 | NH | 2120 | 3.82 | Top 10% | East Asian | 45.5% |
| 2008 | CT | 2090 | 3.70 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 64.0% |
| 2008 | NJ | 2050 | 3.90 | Top 5% | African-American | 91.6% |
| 2008 | MN | 35 | 4.00 | Valedictorian | Caucasian | 96.5% |
| 2008 | HI | 35 | 4.00 | Valedictorian | South Asian | 96.5% |
| 2008 | MN | 34 | 4.00 | Valedictorian | Caucasian | 93.0% |
| 2008 | NC | 33 | 3.76 | Top 5% | Other | 73.9% |
| 2008 | IL | 33 | 4.00 | Valedictorian | Caucasian | 86.7% |
| 2008 | MD | 33 | 3.76 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 45.1% |
| 2007 | RI | 2390 | 3.95 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 92.5% |
| 2007 | NY | 2240 | 3.95 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 84.6% |
| 2007 | TX | 2180 | 4.00 | Top 5% | Other | 76.4% |
| 2007 | IL | 2050 | 4.00 | Valedictorian | Caucasian | 96.5% |
| 2006 | TX | 1880 | 4.00 | Top 1% | Hispanic | 81.1% |
|
|
| 2010 | (Private) | 2060 | 3.81 | Top 15% | None Indicated | 21.5% |
| 2010 | PA | 2030 | 3.70 | Class Not Ranked | South Asian | 14.6% |
| 2010 | NY | 1950 | 3.97 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 25.7% |
| 2010 | CT | 1880 | 3.70 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 3.9% |
| 2010 | AZ | 1820 | 3.82 | Top 15% | Hispanic | 25.0% |
| 2010 | IL | 33 | 3.93 | Top 15% | Caucasian | 49.0% |
| 2010 | NE | 30 | 3.86 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 13.9% |
| 2009 | CT | 2220 | 3.70 | Unknown | Caucasian | 50.9% |
| 2009 | CA | 2180 | 4.00 | Top 1% | Caucasian | 84.1% |
| 2009 | ME | 2130 | 4.00 | Salutatorian | Caucasian | 78.6% |
| 2009 | NY | 2110 | 3.60 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 37.9% |
| 2009 | CA | 2100 | 3.90 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 17.5% |
| 2009 | MI | 2060 | 3.61 | Class Not Ranked | South Asian | 28.8% |
| 2009 | MA | 2050 | 3.20 | Class Not Ranked | East Asian | 13.6% |
| 2009 | NJ | 2030 | 4.00 | Top 1% | Caucasian | 55.8% |
| 2009 | NY | 2030 | 2.90 | Class Not Ranked | South Asian | 7.6% |
| 2009 | CA | 2010 | 3.80 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 7.6% |
| 2009 | PA | 2000 | 3.76 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 46.2% |
| 2009 | NJ | 1990 | 3.40 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 21.6% |
| 2009 | NJ | 1990 | 3.40 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 13.9% |
| 2009 | NY | 1980 | 3.90 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 18.9% |
| 2009 | PA | 1960 | 3.50 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 11.7% |
| 2009 | NJ | 1940 | 3.70 | Top 10% | Other | 12.7% |
| 2009 | CA | 1940 | 3.95 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 23.7% |
| 2009 | OK | 1930 | 4.00 | Top 1% | Caucasian | 32.2% |
| 2009 | TX | 1910 | 3.20 | Top 40% | Hispanic | 8.6% |
| 2009 | FL | 1900 | 3.94 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 17.1% |
| 2009 | NJ | 1900 | 3.40 | Bottom 50% | Caucasian | 0.0% |
| 2009 | FL | 1890 | 4.00 | Top 5% | Hispanic | 72.3% |
| 2009 | OH | 1860 | 2.80 | Class Not Ranked | African-American | 16.1% |
| 2009 | XX | 1860 | 3.44 | Unknown | South Asian | 2.6% |
| 2009 | NH | 1830 | 3.00 | Top 10% | East Asian | 2.4% |
| 2009 | MA | 1820 | 3.89 | Top 20% | Hispanic | 16.1% |
| 2009 | NY | 1810 | 3.00 | Unknown | Hispanic | 14.8% |
| 2009 | XX | 1800 | 3.60 | Top 10% | None Indicated | 3.1% |
| 2009 | CA | 1780 | 4.00 | Valedictorian | East Asian | 11.4% |
| 2009 | IL | 1720 | 3.50 | Top 30% | Caucasian | 0.1% |
| 2009 | MA | 1390 | 3.70 | Class Not Ranked | None Indicated | 61.5% |
| 2009 | IL | 34 | 3.65 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 94.3% |
| 2009 | IL | 33 | 4.00 | Valedictorian | Caucasian | 86.7% |
| 2009 | IL | 31 | 3.64 | Class Not Ranked | East Asian | 19.0% |
| 2009 | MI | 28 | 3.75 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 7.9% |
| 2008 | MA | 2360 | 4.00 | Salutatorian | Caucasian | 97.1% |
| 2008 | MN | 2200 | 3.82 | Unknown | Caucasian | 48.6% |
| 2008 | NY | 2160 | 3.90 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 27.4% |
| 2008 | TN | 2120 | 3.30 | Unknown | Other | 35.2% |
| 2008 | NY | 2120 | 4.00 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 64.5% |
| 2008 | IN | 2100 | 4.00 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 44.5% |
| 2008 | GA | 2050 | 4.00 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 52.8% |
| 2008 | (Private) | 2030 | 3.75 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 15.1% |
| 2008 | CA | 2020 | 3.50 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 27.7% |
| 2008 | CT | 2020 | 3.95 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 26.1% |
| 2008 | NY | 1940 | 3.70 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 3.7% |
| 2008 | CA | 1930 | 4.00 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 16.0% |
| 2008 | MA | 34 | 3.94 | Top 5% | None Indicated | 87.2% |
| 2008 | MA | 32 | 3.90 | Unknown | Caucasian | 34.5% |
| 2008 | NH | 29 | 3.30 | Top 40% | Caucasian | 0.2% |
| 2008 | MI | 28 | 3.50 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 2.0% |
| 2008 | IL | 19 | 3.00 | Top 10% | African-American | 0.4% |
| 2007 | NY | 2010 | 4.00 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 38.6% |
| 2007 | CA | 1790 | 4.00 | Top 10% | Hispanic | 35.3% |
| 2006 | NY | 2010 | 3.30 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 5.0% |
| |