University of Michigan - Ann Arbor Applications and Decisions
Below is a list of applicants who have demonstrated interest in University of Michigan - Ann Arbor. Our best formula
for this college is based on
333 members who were accepted or rejected. The formula
has a college admissions prediction accuracy of
94%?.
Because not all members have filled out the most recent version of our survey, some predictions are made based on
less-accurate models. Those are noted with an asterisk (*) next to their prediction.
This is a very popular school, so we're only showing you profiles that have received an admissions decision. If you
want to see all applicants to this school,
click here (caution: the page will take awhile to load).
|
| 2010 | PA | 2140 | 3.80 | Class Not Ranked | None Indicated | 96.0% |
| 2010 | NJ | 2110 | 3.45 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 85.8% |
| 2010 | NY | 2000 | 3.64 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 90.4% |
| 2010 | CA | 1930 | 3.89 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 95.3% |
| 2010 | MI | 1800 | 3.80 | Top 15% | Caucasian | 91.3% |
| 2010 | MI | 31 | 3.59 | Top 30% | Caucasian | 90.2% |
| 2010 | MI | 29 | 3.54 | Top 35% | Caucasian | 85.2% |
| 2009 | CT | 2190 | 3.92 | Top 5% | South Asian | 97.7% |
| 2009 | MI | 2130 | 3.50 | Top 30% | Caucasian | 88.4% |
| 2009 | MI | 2120 | 3.98 | Valedictorian | Caucasian | 97.9% |
| 2009 | MI | 2090 | 3.60 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 91.0% |
| 2009 | CA | 2070 | 3.00 | Unknown | Caucasian | 50.6% |
| 2009 | MI | 1890 | 3.80 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 93.8% |
| 2009 | NJ | 1890 | 3.91 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 95.2% |
| 2009 | IL | 1870 | 3.91 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 95.2% |
| 2009 | CA | 1800 | 3.81 | Top 5% | East Asian | 91.6% |
| 2009 | CT | 35 | 3.67 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 96.0% |
| 2009 | MI | 31 | 3.77 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 94.8% |
| 2009 | MI | 31 | 4.00 | Valedictorian | Caucasian | 97.7% |
| 2009 | MI | 31 | 3.63 | Top 30% | Caucasian | 91.5% |
| 2009 | MI | 31 | 3.52 | Class Not Ranked | South Asian | 87.7% |
| 2009 | MI | 27 | 3.85 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 93.2% |
| 2009 | IL | 26 | 3.45 | Top 10% | Hispanic | 73.4% |
| 2009 | MI | 24 | 3.80 | Top 10% | African-American | 88.4% |
| 2008 | NY | 2370 | 3.93 | Class Not Ranked | East Asian | 98.5% |
| 2008 | MI | 2110 | 3.81 | Unknown | East Asian | 95.8% |
| 2008 | MI | 2100 | 3.63 | Class Not Ranked | East Asian | 92.0% |
| 2008 | MI | 2070 | 3.80 | Class Not Ranked | Hispanic | 95.3% |
| 2008 | MI | 33 | 3.67 | Unknown | Caucasian | 94.3% |
| 2008 | MI | 32 | 3.60 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 91.7% |
| 2008 | MI | 30 | 3.88 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 95.9% |
| 2008 | MI | 28 | 3.83 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 93.6% |
| 2008 | MI | 25 | 3.89 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 92.5% |
| 2008 | IL | 22 | 3.64 | Top 5% | East Asian | 75.8% |
| 2006 | MI | 29 | 3.80 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 93.8% |
|
| 2011 | (Private) | 30 | 3.95 | Top 15% | Caucasian | 96.8% |
| 2010 | OR | 2400 | 4.00 | Valedictorian | South Asian | 99.0% |
| 2010 | IL | 2390 | 3.92 | Top 3% | East Asian | 98.6% |
| 2010 | OH | 2390 | 3.90 | Class Not Ranked | None Indicated | 98.5% |
| 2010 | MI | 2380 | 3.61 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 95.5% |
| 2010 | (Private) | 2380 | 3.86 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 98.2% |
| 2010 | CA | 2380 | 3.95 | Salutatorian | Caucasian | 98.7% |
| 2010 | OH | 2370 | 4.00 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 99.0% |
| 2010 | NY | 2370 | 3.84 | Top 2% | None Indicated | 98.0% |
| 2010 | FL | 2360 | 3.94 | Top 2% | Caucasian | 98.6% |
| 2010 | MD | 2360 | 3.90 | Top 10% | None Indicated | 98.3% |
| 2010 | OH | 2350 | 4.00 | Top 1% | East Asian | 98.8% |
| 2010 | (Private) | 2350 | 3.90 | Class Not Ranked | East Asian | 98.3% |
| 2010 | (Private) | 2350 | 3.40 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 89.9% |
| 2010 | TN | 2340 | 4.00 | Valedictorian | East Asian | 98.8% |
| 2010 | NM | 2340 | 3.98 | Salutatorian | None Indicated | 98.7% |
| 2010 | MA | 2340 | 3.75 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 97.0% |
| 2010 | TN | 2330 | 4.00 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 99.0% |
| 2010 | IL | 2330 | 3.90 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 98.2% |
| 2010 | (Private) | 2330 | 4.00 | Top 1% | East Asian | 98.8% |
| 2010 | (Private) | 2320 | 3.80 | Top 4% | None Indicated | 97.4% |
| 2010 | MO | 2310 | 3.93 | Class Not Ranked | East Asian | 98.3% |
| 2010 | MI | 2310 | 3.85 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 97.8% |
| 2010 | WV | 2310 | 4.00 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 98.7% |
| 2010 | NY | 2310 | 3.90 | Class Not Ranked | Hispanic | 98.1% |
| 2010 | MD | 2310 | 3.71 | Class Not Ranked | East Asian | 96.3% |
| 2010 | OH | 2300 | 3.80 | Top 4% | Caucasian | 97.2% |
| 2010 | NY | 2300 | 3.89 | Unknown | East Asian | 98.0% |
| 2010 | NY | 2300 | 3.86 | Top 2% | Caucasian | 97.8% |
| 2010 | CA | 2290 | 4.00 | Top 1% | South Asian | 98.6% |
| 2010 | MA | 2270 | 3.45 | Top 10% | South Asian | 89.9% |
| 2010 | MD | 2270 | 3.81 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 97.2% |
| 2010 | PA | 2270 | 4.00 | Valedictorian | Caucasian | 98.6% |
| 2010 | MI | 2260 | 3.98 | Salutatorian | Caucasian | 98.4% |
| 2010 | NJ | 2260 | 3.85 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 97.5% |
| 2010 | CA | 2260 | 3.90 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 97.9% |
| 2010 | NJ | 2260 | 3.95 | Top 5% | East Asian | 98.2% |
| 2010 | (Private) | 2250 | 3.70 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 95.7% |
| 2010 | OH | 2250 | 3.81 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 97.1% |
| 2010 | NY | 2250 | 4.00 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 98.5% |
| 2010 | CA | 2250 | 3.74 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 96.1% |
| 2010 | OH | 2240 | 4.00 | Salutatorian | Caucasian | 98.8% |
| 2010 | GA | 2240 | 3.65 | Top 20% | None Indicated | 94.6% |
| 2010 | NJ | 2240 | 4.00 | Class Not Ranked | Other | 98.5% |
| 2010 | TX | 2240 | 3.58 | Top 15% | Caucasian | 93.1% |
| 2010 | (Private) | 2240 | 3.40 | Top 15% | East Asian | 87.3% |
| 2010 | WA | 2240 | 4.00 | Top 1% | None Indicated | 98.5% |
| 2010 | TN | 2230 | 3.98 | Class Not Ranked | None Indicated | 98.3% |
| 2010 | TN | 2230 | 4.00 | Valedictorian | Caucasian | 98.4% |
| 2010 | MD | 2230 | 3.64 | Top 15% | East Asian | 94.2% |
| 2010 | IL | 2220 | 3.80 | Top 2% | East Asian | 97.0% |
| 2010 | MD | 2220 | 3.75 | Top 10% | South Asian | 96.0% |
| 2010 | PA | 2220 | 3.76 | Top 10% | Hispanic | 96.2% |
| 2010 | PA | 2220 | 4.00 | Top 1% | South Asian | 98.4% |
| 2010 | CA | 2210 | 3.84 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 97.4% |
| 2010 | XX | 2210 | 3.84 | Top 5% | East Asian | 97.1% |
| 2010 | CA | 2210 | 3.85 | Top 10% | Other | 97.2% |
| 2010 | MN | 2200 | 3.90 | Top 3% | Caucasian | 98.3% |
| 2010 | MD | 2200 | 3.95 | Class Not Ranked | Other | 98.0% |
| 2010 | MI | 2190 | 4.00 | Top 1% | Caucasian | 98.8% |
| 2010 | GA | 2190 | 3.80 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 96.4% |
| 2010 | CA | 2180 | 3.87 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 97.2% |
| 2010 | NJ | 2180 | 3.85 | Top 10% | East Asian | 97.0% |
| 2010 | NY | 2170 | 3.80 | Top 15% | Caucasian | 96.3% |
| 2010 | (Private) | 2160 | 3.91 | Top 5% | East Asian | 98.3% |
| 2010 | FL | 2160 | 4.00 | Valedictorian | Caucasian | 98.6% |
| 2010 | MI | 2150 | 4.00 | Top 1% | Caucasian | 98.6% |
| 2010 | NJ | 2150 | 3.90 | Top 4% | Caucasian | 97.3% |
| 2010 | MD | 2150 | 3.78 | Class Not Ranked | Middle-Eastern | 95.8% |
| 2010 | VA | 2150 | 3.85 | Top 10% | East Asian | 96.7% |
| 2010 | XX | 2150 | 3.73 | Class Not Ranked | East Asian | 95.0% |
| 2010 | NY | 2140 | 3.80 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 97.0% |
| 2010 | MI | 2140 | 3.83 | Top 5% | East Asian | 97.3% |
| 2010 | MD | 2130 | 3.88 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 97.3% |
| 2010 | NY | 2130 | 3.70 | Unknown | Caucasian | 94.2% |
| 2010 | IL | 2120 | 3.96 | Top 1% | Caucasian | 98.0% |
| 2010 | NY | 2120 | 3.90 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 97.5% |
| 2010 | CA | 2120 | 3.80 | Unknown | East Asian | 95.8% |
| 2010 | MI | 2110 | 3.73 | Class Not Ranked | South Asian | 94.7% |
| 2010 | NH | 2110 | 3.62 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 91.9% |
| 2010 | TN | 2100 | 3.62 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 94.3% |
| 2010 | MI | 2100 | 3.80 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 96.4% |
| 2010 | MA | 2100 | 4.00 | Top 2% | Caucasian | 98.0% |
| 2010 | IN | 2100 | 3.75 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 94.7% |
| 2010 | MD | 2100 | 3.57 | Top 20% | East Asian | 90.2% |
| 2010 | NJ | 2090 | 3.35 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 79.9% |
| 2010 | XX | 2090 | 4.00 | Top 1% | East Asian | 97.8% |
| 2010 | CA | 2080 | 3.75 | Top 5% | South Asian | 94.5% |
| 2010 | TX | 2080 | 3.90 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 96.8% |
| 2010 | NJ | 2080 | 3.72 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 93.9% |
| 2010 | NY | 2080 | 3.68 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 93.0% |
| 2010 | IL | 2070 | 3.86 | Top 5% | East Asian | 96.7% |
| 2010 | PA | 2070 | 4.00 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 97.7% |
| 2010 | NY | 2070 | 3.60 | Class Not Ranked | East Asian | 90.6% |
| 2010 | OH | 2070 | 3.52 | Class Not Ranked | South Asian | 87.7% |
| 2010 | MI | 2060 | 3.87 | Top 2% | Caucasian | 98.1% |
| 2010 | MI | 2060 | 3.88 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 96.9% |
| 2010 | MD | 2060 | 4.00 | Top 1% | Other | 97.7% |
| 2010 | CA | 2060 | 3.77 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 94.7% |
| 2010 | PA | 2060 | 3.83 | Top 10% | East Asian | 95.7% |
| 2010 | XX | 2050 | 3.70 | Top 15% | South Asian | 93.0% |
| 2010 | NJ | 2040 | 3.37 | Class Not Ranked | South Asian | 82.5% |
| 2010 | NJ | 2040 | 3.95 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 97.1% |
| 2010 | XX | 2040 | 3.50 | Class Not Ranked | East Asian | 86.0% |
| 2010 | (Private) | 2040 | 3.85 | Top 2% | Caucasian | 95.8% |
| 2010 | NY | 2040 | 3.90 | Top 25% | Caucasian | 96.5% |
| 2010 | NC | 2040 | 4.00 | Top 3% | East Asian | 97.5% |
| 2010 | NC | 2040 | 3.64 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 91.2% |
| 2010 | ME | 2040 | 3.80 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 95.0% |
| 2010 | CA | 2030 | 3.86 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 95.8% |
| 2010 | NY | 2030 | 3.50 | Unknown | Caucasian | 85.7% |
| 2010 | PA | 2030 | 3.80 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 94.8% |
| 2010 | LA | 2030 | 3.90 | Top 15% | Caucasian | 96.4% |
| 2010 | MA | 2020 | 3.82 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 95.6% |
| 2010 | PA | 2020 | 3.94 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 96.8% |
| 2010 | NY | 2020 | 3.70 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 92.5% |
| 2010 | MD | 2020 | 3.60 | Top 15% | Hispanic | 89.4% |
| 2010 | CA | 2000 | 3.86 | Top 10% | None Indicated | 96.7% |
| 2010 | TN | 2000 | 3.72 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 92.8% |
| 2010 | PA | 1990 | 3.90 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 97.1% |
| 2010 | CT | 1990 | 3.68 | Top 15% | Caucasian | 93.7% |
| 2010 | MI | 1990 | 3.38 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 80.8% |
| 2010 | TX | 1990 | 3.56 | Top 4% | Middle-Eastern | 89.2% |
| 2010 | CA | 1980 | 3.75 | Top 15% | Caucasian | 93.1% |
| 2010 | NY | 1970 | 3.70 | Top 20% | East Asian | 91.6% |
| 2010 | XX | 1970 | 2.80 | Unknown | Middle-Eastern | 27.6% |
| 2010 | NY | 1960 | 3.90 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 96.2% |
| 2010 | CA | 1960 | 3.67 | Unknown | Caucasian | 90.5% |
| 2010 | IN | 1950 | 4.00 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 97.4% |
| 2010 | OH | 1940 | 3.50 | Class Not Ranked | East Asian | 83.2% |
| 2010 | MA | 1930 | 3.80 | Class Not Ranked | South Asian | 93.8% |
| 2010 | MI | 1910 | 3.85 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 94.3% |
| 2010 | XX | 1910 | 4.00 | Top 3% | East Asian | 96.7% |
| 2010 | XX | 1900 | 3.44 | Top 15% | Middle-Eastern | 77.7% |
| 2010 | (Private) | 1900 | 3.70 | Top 15% | Caucasian | 90.2% |
| 2010 | VA | 1880 | 3.85 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 96.1% |
| 2010 | OR | 1880 | 4.00 | Valedictorian | Hispanic | 97.4% |
| 2010 | VA | 1880 | 4.00 | Valedictorian | Caucasian | 96.4% |
| 2010 | NY | 1860 | 3.90 | Top 20% | East Asian | 94.6% |
| 2010 | (Private) | 1840 | 3.85 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 93.3% |
| 2010 | CA | 1830 | 3.70 | Class Not Ranked | Middle-Eastern | 88.6% |
| 2010 | AZ | 1820 | 3.82 | Top 15% | Hispanic | 92.3% |
| 2010 | CT | 1790 | 3.70 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 90.0% |
| 2010 | XX | 1790 | 4.00 | Top 10% | South Asian | 95.6% |
| 2010 | XX | 1790 | 3.70 | Class Not Ranked | East Asian | 87.7% |
| 2010 | PA | 1740 | 4.00 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 95.1% |
| 2010 | NY | 1720 | 3.30 | Top 35% | Caucasian | 57.3% |
| 2010 | MD | 1360 | 3.70 | Class Not Ranked | East Asian | 81.9% |
| 2010 | VA | 750 | 4.00 | Top 1% | None Indicated | 98.6% |
| 2010 | MI | 35 | 3.90 | Top 5% | None Indicated | 98.3% |
| 2010 | CA | 35 | 3.67 | Top 15% | South Asian | 96.0% |
| 2010 | MI | 35 | 3.98 | Salutatorian | Caucasian | 98.7% |
| 2010 | MI | 34 | 3.94 | Top 3% | Caucasian | 98.2% |
| 2010 | (Private) | 34 | 3.72 | Top 15% | South Asian | 96.0% |
| 2010 | NY | 34 | 4.00 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 98.6% |
| 2010 | (Private) | 34 | 3.69 | Top 10% | East Asian | 95.6% |
| 2010 | MI | 33 | 4.00 | Valedictorian | Middle-Eastern | 98.3% |
| 2010 | (Private) | 33 | 4.00 | Valedictorian | Caucasian | 98.3% |
| 2010 | KY | 33 | 3.91 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 97.6% |
| 2010 | IL | 33 | 3.93 | Top 15% | Caucasian | 97.8% |
| 2010 | MI | 33 | 3.98 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 98.1% |
| 2010 | MI | 33 | 3.93 | Top 4% | East Asian | 97.8% |
| 2010 | NC | 33 | 4.00 | Top 4% | Caucasian | 98.3% |
| 2010 | MI | 33 | 3.95 | Salutatorian | None Indicated | 97.9% |
| 2010 | MI | 33 | 3.83 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 96.8% |
| 2010 | MI | 32 | 3.95 | Top 3% | Hispanic | 97.6% |
| 2010 | IL | 32 | 3.24 | Class Not Ranked | East Asian | 74.3% |
| 2010 | MI | 32 | 4.00 | Top 3% | Caucasian | 98.0% |
| 2010 | MI | 32 | 3.85 | Top 5% | South Asian | 96.6% |
| 2010 | CA | 32 | 3.86 | Valedictorian | Hispanic | 96.7% |
| 2010 | MD | 31 | 3.47 | Top 10% | South Asian | 85.5% |
| 2010 | MI | 31 | 3.99 | Top 5% | Hispanic | 97.6% |
| 2010 | NY | 31 | 3.94 | Class Not Ranked | East Asian | 97.2% |
| 2010 | TX | 31 | 3.64 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 91.8% |
| 2010 | MI | 31 | 3.86 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 96.2% |
| 2010 | IL | 31 | 3.40 | Top 15% | Caucasian | 82.0% |
| 2010 | CA | 31 | 3.86 | Top 4% | Caucasian | 96.2% |
| 2010 | TX | 31 | 3.82 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 95.6% |
| 2010 | NY | 30 | 3.76 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 93.8% |
| 2010 | MI | 30 | 3.90 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 96.2% |
| 2010 | IA | 30 | 3.56 | Top 20% | African-American | 87.7% |
| 2010 | MI | 30 | 3.60 | Unknown | Caucasian | 89.2% |
| 2010 | MI | 30 | 3.59 | Top 25% | Other | 88.9% |
| 2010 | MI | 30 | 3.70 | Unknown | Caucasian | 92.3% |
| 2010 | CO | 29 | 3.77 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 93.1% |
| 2010 | MI | 29 | 3.85 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 94.8% |
| 2010 | MI | 29 | 3.72 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 91.8% |
| 2010 | UT | 29 | 3.80 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 93.8% |
| 2010 | IL | 28 | 3.90 | Top 4% | East Asian | 95.0% |
| 2010 | IL | 28 | 4.00 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 96.5% |
| 2010 | CA | 28 | 3.75 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 91.6% |
| 2010 | MI | 28 | 3.78 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 92.4% |
| 2010 | MI | 28 | 3.72 | Top 15% | Caucasian | 90.7% |
| 2010 | WI | 27 | 3.60 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 84.3% |
| 2009 | NY | 2400 | 4.00 | Valedictorian | Hispanic | 99.0% |
| 2009 | AZ | 2400 | 4.00 | Valedictorian | Caucasian | 99.0% |
| 2009 | MD | 2390 | 4.00 | Top 5% | Other | 98.9% |
| 2009 | NJ | 2380 | 3.90 | Class Not Ranked | East Asian | 98.4% |
| 2009 | NJ | 2360 | 4.00 | Valedictorian | None Indicated | 98.9% |
| 2009 | MI | 2350 | 3.80 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 97.5% |
| 2009 | XX | 2350 | 3.80 | Top 5% | East Asian | 97.5% |
| 2009 | (Private) | 2350 | 3.90 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 98.3% |
| 2009 | MD | 2350 | 4.00 | Top 1% | Caucasian | 98.8% |
| 2009 | (Private) | 2340 | 3.93 | Top 1% | South Asian | 98.4% |
| 2009 | VA | 2340 | 3.99 | Unknown | Caucasian | 98.7% |
| 2009 | NJ | 2330 | 3.96 | Top 10% | East Asian | 98.6% |
| 2009 | OH | 2330 | 3.81 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 97.5% |
| 2009 | MA | 2330 | 3.95 | Top 1% | Caucasian | 98.5% |
| 2009 | XX | 2320 | 4.00 | Class Not Ranked | East Asian | 98.7% |
| 2009 | MI | 2310 | 4.00 | Top 1% | Caucasian | 98.8% |
| 2009 | (Private) | 2310 | 3.80 | Top 10% | None Indicated | 97.3% |
| 2009 | NJ | 2310 | 3.70 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 96.1% |
| 2009 | MI | 2300 | 4.00 | Valedictorian | East Asian | 98.7% |
| 2009 | MI | 2290 | 3.70 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 95.9% |
| 2009 | MI | 2290 | 3.97 | Top 10% | South Asian | 98.5% |
| 2009 | NY | 2290 | 3.76 | Class Not Ranked | East Asian | 96.7% |
| 2009 | NJ | 2290 | 4.00 | Valedictorian | East Asian | 98.6% |
| 2009 | XX | 2290 | 4.00 | Salutatorian | East Asian | 98.6% |
| 2009 | MI | 2280 | 3.95 | Top 1% | Caucasian | 98.3% |
| 2009 | VA | 2270 | 4.00 | Valedictorian | Caucasian | 98.8% |
| 2009 | NY | 2270 | 3.95 | Unknown | Caucasian | 98.3% |
| 2009 | OH | 2270 | 3.90 | Salutatorian | Caucasian | 97.9% |
| 2009 | DC | 2270 | 3.94 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 98.2% |
| 2009 | IL | 2260 | 4.00 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 98.6% |
| 2009 | MI | 2260 | 3.88 | Unknown | South Asian | 97.7% |
| 2009 | IL | 2250 | 3.60 | Top 20% | Hispanic | 93.9% |
| 2009 | NY | 2250 | 3.80 | Class Not Ranked | South Asian | 96.9% |
| 2009 | IL | 2240 | 4.00 | Valedictorian | East Asian | 98.8% |
| 2009 | WA | 2240 | 3.99 | Top 1% | Caucasian | 98.5% |
| 2009 | CA | 2240 | 3.79 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 96.7% |
| 2009 | (Private) | 2240 | 3.90 | Salutatorian | Caucasian | 97.8% |
| 2009 | MI | 2230 | 3.88 | Unknown | East Asian | 98.1% |
| 2009 | CA | 2230 | 4.00 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 98.6% |
| 2009 | CT | 2230 | 3.68 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 95.0% |
| 2009 | GA | 2230 | 3.50 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 90.7% |
| 2009 | NJ | 2220 | 3.84 | Class Not Ranked | South Asian | 97.1% |
| 2009 | MN | 2220 | 3.96 | Top 5% | East Asian | 98.1% |
| 2009 | MI | 2210 | 3.85 | Class Not Ranked | South Asian | 97.2% |
| 2009 | NJ | 2200 | 3.64 | Top 10% | East Asian | 93.8% |
| 2009 | NJ | 2200 | 3.70 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 95.0% |
| 2009 | NY | 2190 | 3.85 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 97.9% |
| 2009 | IL | 2190 | 3.70 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 95.7% |
| 2009 | VA | 2190 | 3.70 | Class Not Ranked | None Indicated | 94.9% |
| 2009 | MA | 2180 | 3.05 | Class Not Ranked | None Indicated | 70.3% |
| 2009 | MI | 2180 | 3.66 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 94.1% |
| 2009 | HI | 2180 | 3.70 | Unknown | Other | 94.8% |
| 2009 | OR | 2180 | 3.68 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 94.4% |
| 2009 | (Private) | 2170 | 4.00 | Top 1% | South Asian | 98.8% |
| 2009 | (Private) | 2170 | 3.99 | Valedictorian | Caucasian | 98.7% |
| 2009 | MI | 2150 | 4.00 | Salutatorian | None Indicated | 98.3% |
| 2009 | PA | 2150 | 3.88 | Top 1% | South Asian | 97.1% |
| 2009 | FL | 2140 | 4.00 | Top 20% | Other | 98.6% |
| 2009 | XX | 2140 | 3.60 | Class Not Ranked | East Asian | 91.9% |
| 2009 | TN | 2140 | 3.99 | Valedictorian | Caucasian | 98.0% |
| 2009 | CT | 2140 | 3.83 | Top 1% | African-American | 96.4% |
| 2009 | CA | 2140 | 3.80 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 96.0% |
| 2009 | FL | 2130 | 3.90 | Top 1% | None Indicated | 97.9% |
| 2009 | NJ | 2130 | 3.80 | Top 5% | None Indicated | 95.9% |
| 2009 | MD | 2130 | 3.80 | Unknown | Caucasian | 95.9% |
| 2009 | OH | 2120 | 4.00 | Top 1% | Caucasian | 98.6% |
| 2009 | TX | 2110 | 3.73 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 96.1% |
| 2009 | MI | 2110 | 3.95 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 97.6% |
| 2009 | NJ | 2110 | 3.50 | Top 30% | Caucasian | 87.9% |
| 2009 | NY | 2110 | 3.80 | Class Not Ranked | East Asian | 95.7% |
| 2009 | CT | 2110 | 3.95 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 97.5% |
| 2009 | OH | 2100 | 3.80 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 96.4% |
| 2009 | NJ | 2100 | 3.70 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 93.7% |
| 2009 | (Private) | 2100 | 3.74 | Top 10% | Other | 94.6% |
| 2009 | FL | 2090 | 3.80 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 95.9% |
| 2009 | DC | 2090 | 3.89 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 96.7% |
| 2009 | (Private) | 2090 | 3.70 | Class Not Ranked | East Asian | 93.6% |
| 2009 | OH | 2090 | 3.90 | Salutatorian | Caucasian | 96.9% |
| 2009 | PA | 2090 | 4.00 | Top 10% | East Asian | 97.8% |
| 2009 | TX | 2080 | 3.75 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 95.1% |
| 2009 | IN | 2080 | 3.67 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 92.7% |
| 2009 | PA | 2080 | 3.93 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 97.1% |
| 2009 | (Private) | 2070 | 4.00 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 97.7% |
| 2009 | OH | 2060 | 4.00 | Top 1% | Caucasian | 98.3% |
| 2009 | MI | 2060 | 3.61 | Class Not Ranked | South Asian | 92.0% |
| 2009 | WI | 2060 | 3.75 | Top 10% | South Asian | 94.4% |
| 2009 | RI | 2060 | 3.76 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 94.5% |
| 2009 | (Private) | 2060 | 3.65 | Unknown | Caucasian | 91.9% |
| 2009 | VA | 2060 | 3.90 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 96.6% |
| 2009 | CA | 2050 | 3.90 | Salutatorian | Caucasian | 97.5% |
| 2009 | NJ | 2050 | 3.40 | Class Not Ranked | South Asian | 84.0% |
| 2009 | (Private) | 2050 | 3.72 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 93.4% |
| 2009 | PA | 2050 | 3.95 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 97.1% |
| 2009 | OH | 2040 | 3.92 | Salutatorian | Caucasian | 98.1% |
| 2009 | MI | 2040 | 3.98 | Top 1% | African-American | 97.5% |
| 2009 | TX | 2040 | 3.70 | Top 10% | East Asian | 93.3% |
| 2009 | XX | 2040 | 3.80 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 95.0% |
| 2009 | FL | 2030 | 3.48 | Top 10% | African-American | 86.0% |
| 2009 | NJ | 2030 | 3.70 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 92.7% |
| 2009 | XX | 2020 | 3.60 | Top 20% | South Asian | 89.4% |
| 2009 | TX | 2010 | 3.61 | Top 10% | Native American | 92.0% |
| 2009 | TX | 2010 | 3.91 | Top 20% | South Asian | 96.3% |
| 2009 | XX | 2000 | 4.00 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 97.3% |
| 2009 | FL | 1990 | 3.90 | Top 1% | Hispanic | 96.0% |
| 2009 | CA | 1980 | 3.75 | Top 5% | Other | 94.4% |
| 2009 | MI | 1970 | 3.88 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 97.3% |
| 2009 | OH | 1950 | 3.20 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 71.4% |
| 2009 | NJ | 1950 | 3.75 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 92.6% |
| 2009 | NY | 1940 | 4.00 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 98.0% |
| 2009 | OH | 1940 | 3.80 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 93.7% |
| 2009 | CA | 1940 | 3.95 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 96.3% |
| 2009 | NY | 1920 | 4.00 | Top 10% | Hispanic | 97.7% |
| 2009 | OH | 1920 | 3.69 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 92.1% |
| 2009 | NY | 1920 | 3.80 | Unknown | East Asian | 93.4% |
| 2009 | XX | 1920 | 3.50 | Top 10% | East Asian | 82.1% |
| 2009 | VA | 1920 | 3.90 | Top 1% | Caucasian | 95.3% |
| 2009 | CA | 1900 | 3.65 | Class Not Ranked | Hispanic | 89.6% |
| 2009 | OH | 1870 | 3.37 | Class Not Ranked | Hispanic | 84.5% |
| 2009 | MN | 1840 | 3.75 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 94.4% |
| 2009 | FL | 1840 | 3.60 | Top 5% | Hispanic | 87.8% |
| 2009 | CT | 1840 | 3.29 | Unknown | African-American | 63.3% |
| 2009 | AZ | 1830 | 4.00 | Top 1% | Caucasian | 96.0% |
| 2009 | SC | 1810 | 3.70 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 93.3% |
| 2009 | NY | 1810 | 3.00 | Unknown | Hispanic | 36.4% |
| 2009 | (Private) | 1810 | 3.75 | Top 20% | South Asian | 89.9% |
| 2009 | MI | 1800 | 3.85 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 94.0% |
| 2009 | XX | 1800 | 3.60 | Top 10% | None Indicated | 83.3% |
| 2009 | TX | 1760 | 3.48 | Top 30% | Caucasian | 79.9% |
| 2009 | NJ | 1750 | 3.90 | Top 5% | Hispanic | 93.1% |
| 2009 | NY | 1700 | 3.85 | Class Not Ranked | Hispanic | 94.0% |
| 2009 | NY | 1510 | 3.67 | Top 10% | South Asian | 95.2% |
| 2009 | MI | 35 | 4.00 | Top 5% | East Asian | 98.8% |
| 2009 | NE | 34 | 4.00 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 98.6% |
| 2009 | (Private) | 34 | 3.99 | Top 1% | East Asian | 98.5% |
| 2009 | MI | 33 | 4.00 | Valedictorian | Caucasian | 98.3% |
| 2009 | IL | 33 | 4.00 | Valedictorian | Caucasian | 98.3% |
| 2009 | CA | 33 | 3.50 | Top 10% | South Asian | 89.8% |
| 2009 | IL | 32 | 3.32 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 79.6% |
| 2009 | NJ | 32 | 3.70 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 94.2% |
| 2009 | (Private) | 32 | 3.97 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 97.8% |
| 2009 | (Private) | 32 | 3.94 | Top 10% | South Asian | 97.5% |
| 2009 | CA | 32 | 3.80 | Unknown | Caucasian | 95.9% |
| 2009 | NY | 32 | 3.82 | Top 20% | African-American | 96.2% |
| 2009 | CA | 32 | 3.60 | Top 10% | Other | 91.7% |
| 2009 | IL | 31 | 3.85 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 96.1% |
| 2009 | OH | 31 | 3.85 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 96.1% |
| 2009 | MI | 31 | 4.00 | Valedictorian | Caucasian | 97.7% |
| 2009 | MI | 31 | 3.97 | Unknown | Caucasian | 97.4% |
| 2009 | MI | 31 | 3.99 | Valedictorian | Caucasian | 97.6% |
| 2009 | MI | 30 | 3.74 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 93.3% |
| 2009 | MI | 30 | 3.73 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 93.1% |
| 2009 | CA | 30 | 3.95 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 96.8% |
| 2009 | MI | 29 | 3.87 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 95.2% |
| 2009 | OH | 29 | 3.55 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 85.6% |
| 2009 | CA | 28 | 3.80 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 92.9% |
| 2009 | MI | 28 | 3.97 | Top 5% | East Asian | 96.1% |
| 2009 | MI | 27 | 3.30 | Top 30% | Caucasian | 63.7% |
| 2008 | KS | 2400 | 4.00 | Valedictorian | East Asian | 99.0% |
| 2008 | MI | 2400 | 3.99 | Top 1% | Caucasian | 98.9% |
| 2008 | MD | 2380 | 4.00 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 98.9% |
| 2008 | NY | 2370 | 4.00 | Salutatorian | None Indicated | 98.9% |
| 2008 | MA | 2370 | 4.00 | Top 5% | East Asian | 98.9% |
| 2008 | MI | 2360 | 4.00 | Valedictorian | None Indicated | 98.9% |
| 2008 | NY | 2350 | 3.97 | Salutatorian | Other | 98.7% |
| 2008 | PA | 2340 | 3.70 | Top 10% | East Asian | 96.4% |
| 2008 | TX | 2340 | 3.93 | Top 1% | Caucasian | 98.4% |
| 2008 | MA | 2340 | 3.80 | Top 5% | South Asian | 97.5% |
| 2008 | MA | 2340 | 3.85 | Top 5% | South Asian | 97.9% |
| 2008 | NY | 2340 | 3.90 | Unknown | Other | 98.3% |
| 2008 | WI | 2330 | 3.89 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 98.2% |
| 2008 | (Private) | 2320 | 3.82 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 97.7% |
| 2008 | MD | 2320 | 3.88 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 98.0% |
| 2008 | XX | 2320 | 4.00 | Unknown | East Asian | 98.7% |
| 2008 | MI | 2310 | 4.00 | Valedictorian | East Asian | 98.7% |
| 2008 | NJ | 2310 | 3.91 | Top 5% | East Asian | 98.2% |
| 2008 | OH | 2290 | 4.00 | Valedictorian | South Asian | 98.6% |
| 2008 | NJ | 2290 | 3.82 | Top 10% | East Asian | 97.4% |
| 2008 | NY | 2280 | 3.92 | Top 10% | South Asian | 98.1% |
| 2008 | NY | 2280 | 4.00 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 98.6% |
| 2008 | (Private) | 2280 | 3.95 | Top 5% | None Indicated | 98.3% |
| 2008 | IL | 2270 | 3.98 | Unknown | Caucasian | 98.5% |
| 2008 | XX | 2260 | 4.00 | Top 10% | None Indicated | 98.5% |
| 2008 | FL | 2260 | 4.00 | Top 5% | Hispanic | 98.5% |
| 2008 | OH | 2240 | 3.72 | Unknown | Caucasian | 95.8% |
| 2008 | (Private) | 2230 | 3.85 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 97.3% |
| 2008 | XX | 2170 | 3.76 | Class Not Ranked | East Asian | 95.7% |
| 2008 | FL | 2170 | 3.60 | Top 5% | South Asian | 92.4% |
| 2008 | NJ | 2170 | 3.90 | Top 10% | South Asian | 97.4% |
| 2008 | NY | 2160 | 3.55 | Unknown | Caucasian | 90.8% |
| 2008 | MI | 2150 | 4.00 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 98.3% |
| 2008 | PA | 2150 | 4.00 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 98.1% |
| 2008 | TN | 2140 | 4.00 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 99.0% |
| 2008 | MI | 2130 | 3.95 | Top 1% | Caucasian | 97.9% |
| 2008 | (Private) | 2130 | 3.60 | Unknown | East Asian | 91.7% |
| 2008 | MI | 2130 | 3.98 | Unknown | East Asian | 97.9% |
| 2008 | NH | 2120 | 3.82 | Top 10% | East Asian | 96.1% |
| 2008 | MI | 2100 | 3.98 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 97.7% |
| 2008 | CA | 2090 | 3.90 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 97.1% |
| 2008 | MD | 2080 | 3.63 | Unknown | Hispanic | 91.6% |
| 2008 | MI | 2040 | 4.00 | Top 1% | Caucasian | 98.8% |
| 2008 | CT | 2020 | 3.95 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 96.9% |
| 2008 | MI | 2010 | 3.80 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 94.6% |
| 2008 | CA | 1990 | 3.97 | Top 1% | None Indicated | 97.4% |
| 2008 | FL | 1940 | 4.00 | Top 1% | Hispanic | 98.3% |
| 2008 | CA | 1850 | 3.89 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 94.3% |
| 2008 | XX | 1760 | 3.75 | Top 5% | Hispanic | 88.8% |
| 2008 | DC | 1580 | 3.70 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 96.6% |
| 2008 | FL | 1430 | 3.80 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 96.0% |
| 2008 | OH | 1250 | 4.00 | Valedictorian | Caucasian | 97.7% |
| 2008 | OH | 36 | 4.00 | Top 1% | Caucasian | 99.0% |
| 2008 | ID | 35 | 4.00 | Valedictorian | Caucasian | 98.8% |
| 2008 | MI | 35 | 4.00 | Valedictorian | Caucasian | 98.8% |
| 2008 | FL | 35 | 3.98 | Top 1% | South Asian | 98.7% |
| 2008 | MN | 35 | 3.98 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 98.7% |
| 2008 | MI | 34 | 3.88 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 97.8% |
| 2008 | MI | 34 | 4.00 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 98.6% |
| 2008 | WI | 33 | 4.00 | Top 1% | Caucasian | 98.3% |
| 2008 | NY | 33 | 4.00 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 98.3% |
| 2008 | XX | 33 | 3.78 | Top 10% | East Asian | 96.2% |
| 2008 | IL | 33 | 4.00 | Valedictorian | Caucasian | 98.3% |
| 2008 | MD | 33 | 3.76 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 95.9% |
| 2008 | NY | 33 | 3.63 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 93.5% |
| 2008 | IL | 32 | 3.80 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 95.9% |
| 2008 | IL | 32 | 3.60 | Top 10% | Hispanic | 91.7% |
| 2008 | IL | 32 | 3.92 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 97.3% |
| 2008 | NY | 32 | 3.60 | Top 10% | Hispanic | 91.7% |
| 2008 | GA | 32 | 3.80 | Unknown | East Asian | 95.9% |
| 2008 | MI | 31 | 3.80 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 95.3% |
| 2008 | VA | 31 | 3.91 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 96.8% |
| 2008 | MI | 30 | 4.00 | Valedictorian | Caucasian | 97.4% |
| 2008 | NY | 29 | 3.70 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 91.2% |
| 2008 | MI | 29 | 3.55 | Top 30% | Caucasian | 85.6% |
| 2008 | MI | 29 | 4.00 | Top 1% | Caucasian | 97.0% |
| 2007 | MI | 2400 | 4.00 | Valedictorian | Caucasian | 99.0% |
| 2007 | MD | 2400 | 4.00 | Valedictorian | Caucasian | 99.0% |
| 2007 | CA | 2380 | 4.00 | Salutatorian | South Asian | 98.9% |
| 2007 | OH | 2360 | 4.00 | Salutatorian | Caucasian | 98.9% |
| 2007 | NY | 2350 | 3.70 | Unknown | None Indicated | 96.5% |
| 2007 | MI | 2300 | 3.80 | Top 10% | East Asian | 97.2% |
| 2007 | NY | 2280 | 3.80 | Class Not Ranked | South Asian | 97.1% |
| 2007 | XX | 2270 | 3.98 | Unknown | East Asian | 98.5% |
| 2007 | AZ | 2260 | 3.98 | Valedictorian | East Asian | 98.4% |
| 2007 | XX | 2240 | 4.00 | Top 5% | African-American | 98.5% |
| 2007 | NJ | 2220 | 3.88 | Top 10% | South Asian | 97.5% |
| 2007 | PA | 2220 | 4.00 | Top 1% | East Asian | 98.4% |
| 2007 | NY | 2210 | 3.57 | Unknown | Caucasian | 92.3% |
| 2007 | MO | 2180 | 3.70 | Top 30% | Caucasian | 94.8% |
| 2007 | MI | 2160 | 4.00 | Valedictorian | Caucasian | 98.1% |
| 2007 | MI | 2160 | 4.00 | Valedictorian | Caucasian | 98.1% |
| 2007 | NC | 2140 | 3.96 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 97.7% |
| 2007 | XX | 2020 | 4.00 | Valedictorian | Middle-Eastern | 97.4% |
| 2007 | PA | 2000 | 3.50 | Unknown | East Asian | 84.8% |
| 2007 | MI | 1590 | 4.00 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 96.0% |
| 2007 | MI | 1420 | 3.85 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 96.6% |
| 2007 | IA | 36 | 4.00 | Valedictorian | Caucasian | 99.0% |
| 2007 | OH | 34 | 3.33 | Unknown | South Asian | 84.9% |
| 2007 | IL | 34 | 3.56 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 93.0% |
| 2007 | CA | 33 | 3.83 | Class Not Ranked | Other | 96.8% |
| 2007 | TX | 28 | 3.65 | Top 5% | South Asian | 88.2% |
| 2006 | CA | 2340 | 3.80 | Top 10% | East Asian | 97.5% |
| 2006 | NY | 2280 | 3.84 | Unknown | None Indicated | 97.5% |
| 2006 | PA | 2210 | 3.96 | Top 5% | South Asian | 98.1% |
| 2006 | CA | 2140 | 3.90 | Top 5% | East Asian | 97.2% |
| 2002 | MI | 2290 | 4.00 | Valedictorian | Caucasian | 98.6% |
| 2002 | MI | 2280 | 4.00 | Valedictorian | Caucasian | 98.6% |
| 2001 | CA | 2080 | 3.80 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 95.4% |
| 2000 | TN | 1290 | 2.00 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 0.4% |
|
|
| 2010 | NY | 1690 | 3.40 | Unknown | Caucasian | 64.4% |
| 2010 | (Private) | 32 | 2.80 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 35.9% |
| 2009 | NY | 2290 | 3.64 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 95.0% |
| 2009 | NY | 2270 | 3.92 | Top 2% | Caucasian | 98.1% |
| 2009 | XX | 2240 | 3.30 | Unknown | South Asian | 82.6% |
| 2009 | CA | 2070 | 3.35 | Top 10% | East Asian | 79.1% |
| 2009 | OH | 2060 | 3.92 | Salutatorian | Caucasian | 98.4% |
| 2009 | NJ | 2050 | 3.08 | Class Not Ranked | African-American | 56.7% |
| 2009 | VA | 1980 | 3.00 | Top 20% | South Asian | 45.1% |
| 2009 | WA | 1910 | 3.48 | Top 30% | East Asian | 80.7% |
| 2009 | CA | 1880 | 3.40 | Class Not Ranked | None Indicated | 77.3% |
| 2009 | MI | 1850 | 3.90 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 95.6% |
| 2009 | IL | 32 | 3.50 | Top 20% | Hispanic | 88.4% |
| 2009 | MI | 28 | 3.15 | Unknown | Caucasian | 53.7% |
| 2009 | MI | 27 | 2.70 | Bottom 40% | Caucasian | 15.8% |
| 2008 | KS | 2040 | 3.98 | Top 5% | African-American | 97.4% |
| 2008 | AZ | 1950 | 3.30 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 70.1% |
| 2008 | MD | 1910 | 3.50 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 81.8% |
| 2008 | NJ | 1630 | 3.08 | Bottom 40% | Caucasian | 32.2% |
| 2008 | XX | 1540 | 3.97 | Top 10% | East Asian | 91.4% |
| 2008 | IL | 30 | 3.88 | Valedictorian | Caucasian | 95.9% |
| 2007 | CO | 2060 | 3.40 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 81.7% |
| 2007 | VA | 2020 | 3.20 | Top 20% | South Asian | 65.6% |
| 2006 | MI | 29 | 3.57 | Unknown | Caucasian | 86.5% |
| 2006 | IL | 24 | 3.75 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 86.3% |
| |