University of Miami Applications and Decisions
Below is a list of applicants who have demonstrated interest in University of Miami. Our best formula
for this college is based on
136 members who were accepted or rejected. The formula
has a college admissions prediction accuracy of
90%?.
Because not all members have filled out the most recent version of our survey, some predictions are made based on
less-accurate models. Those are noted with an asterisk (*) next to their prediction.
This is a very popular school, and you're looking at the whole list. If you
would like to only see completed applications,
click here for a smaller version of this page.
|
| 2010 | PA | 1940 | 3.81 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 95.6% |
| 2010 | (Private) | 1750 | 3.83 | Top 10% | None Indicated | 97.7% |
| 2010 | FL | 1480 | 3.80 | Top 4% | African-American | 75.8% |
| 2009 | FL | 2380 | 3.95 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 100.0% |
| 2009 | FL | 2310 | 3.67 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 99.8% |
| 2009 | TX | 2190 | 4.00 | Top 1% | South Asian | 100.0% |
| 2009 | FL | 2060 | 3.60 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 99.0% |
| 2009 | FL | 1980 | 3.90 | Unknown | None Indicated | 99.5% |
| 2009 | MA | 1950 | 3.35 | Top 30% | Caucasian | 79.1% |
| 2009 | NY | 1930 | 3.90 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 96.8% |
| 2009 | GA | 1770 | 3.10 | Top 30% | South Asian | 37.6% |
| 2009 | (Private) | 1710 | 2.99 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 99.8% |
| 2008 | MA | 2120 | 3.75 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 98.1% |
| 2008 | FL | 1990 | 3.65 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 99.1% |
| 2008 | MA | 1930 | 3.03 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 60.1% |
| 2008 | XX | 1880 | 3.30 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 78.9% |
| 2007 | MA | 2000 | 3.20 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 79.7% |
|
| 2011 | FL | 2070 | 3.39 | Unknown | South Asian | 98.4% |
| 2010 | FL | 2370 | 4.00 | Valedictorian | South Asian | 100.0% |
| 2010 | (Private) | 2350 | 3.40 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 98.2% |
| 2010 | FL | 2320 | 3.94 | Valedictorian | Caucasian | 100.0% |
| 2010 | FL | 2300 | 3.70 | Top 20% | Hispanic | 99.5% |
| 2010 | SC | 2280 | 4.00 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 99.7% |
| 2010 | IL | 2250 | 3.60 | Top 40% | Caucasian | 97.4% |
| 2010 | CA | 2250 | 3.53 | Top 15% | Hispanic | 100.0% |
| 2010 | MD | 2250 | 3.80 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 99.4% |
| 2010 | CA | 2240 | 3.96 | Valedictorian | Other | 99.6% |
| 2010 | NY | 2200 | 3.70 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 98.4% |
| 2010 | FL | 2180 | 3.00 | Top 10% | Hispanic | 92.5% |
| 2010 | (Private) | 2170 | 3.91 | Top 2% | Caucasian | 99.9% |
| 2010 | MA | 2170 | 3.12 | Top 10% | None Indicated | 90.9% |
| 2010 | FL | 2170 | 3.80 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 99.7% |
| 2010 | NJ | 2160 | 3.68 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 98.9% |
| 2010 | MD | 2160 | 3.98 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 99.4% |
| 2010 | FL | 2130 | 3.51 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 100.0% |
| 2010 | CA | 2110 | 3.75 | Top 3% | African-American | 95.4% |
| 2010 | PA | 2100 | 3.26 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 90.4% |
| 2010 | FL | 2100 | 3.97 | Top 2% | Caucasian | 99.8% |
| 2010 | (Private) | 2090 | 3.72 | Class Not Ranked | South Asian | 98.0% |
| 2010 | FL | 2090 | 3.52 | Top 20% | Hispanic | 96.9% |
| 2010 | NC | 2060 | 3.75 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 97.3% |
| 2010 | FL | 2060 | 3.35 | Top 2% | Hispanic | 95.7% |
| 2010 | NJ | 2060 | 3.76 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 97.1% |
| 2010 | NJ | 2040 | 3.95 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 98.4% |
| 2010 | NJ | 2030 | 3.73 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 96.6% |
| 2010 | NH | 2030 | 3.60 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 95.4% |
| 2010 | FL | 2020 | 3.50 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 98.4% |
| 2010 | VA | 2010 | 3.71 | Top 10% | Hispanic | 94.6% |
| 2010 | TX | 2000 | 3.50 | Top 15% | Hispanic | 88.9% |
| 2010 | FL | 2000 | 3.87 | Unknown | Caucasian | 99.5% |
| 2010 | NJ | 2000 | 3.70 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 96.0% |
| 2010 | FL | 1990 | 3.50 | Top 10% | East Asian | 99.3% |
| 2010 | CT | 1990 | 3.68 | Top 15% | Caucasian | 97.7% |
| 2010 | TX | 1990 | 4.00 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 98.5% |
| 2010 | FL | 1980 | 3.20 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 97.0% |
| 2010 | (Private) | 1960 | 3.60 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 93.9% |
| 2010 | CA | 1960 | 3.73 | Class Not Ranked | South Asian | 94.9% |
| 2010 | FL | 1960 | 3.20 | Top 25% | Caucasian | 93.3% |
| 2010 | VA | 1960 | 3.80 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 95.9% |
| 2010 | PA | 1950 | 3.40 | Top 40% | Caucasian | 78.0% |
| 2010 | FL | 1930 | 4.00 | Valedictorian | Hispanic | 98.9% |
| 2010 | FL | 1930 | 3.78 | Top 10% | South Asian | 99.0% |
| 2010 | FL | 1910 | 3.48 | Top 10% | Native American | 92.3% |
| 2010 | GA | 1910 | 3.30 | Unknown | African-American | 54.6% |
| 2010 | FL | 1890 | 4.00 | Top 10% | Hispanic | 99.6% |
| 2010 | GA | 1890 | 3.50 | Top 30% | Other | 85.9% |
| 2010 | FL | 1890 | 3.75 | Top 1% | Hispanic | 97.7% |
| 2010 | (Private) | 1890 | 3.90 | Top 5% | Hispanic | 97.8% |
| 2010 | FL | 1880 | 3.73 | Top 20% | South Asian | 98.2% |
| 2010 | ID | 1880 | 3.48 | Top 15% | African-American | 64.2% |
| 2010 | FL | 1870 | 3.56 | Top 15% | Caucasian | 97.3% |
| 2010 | MA | 1870 | 3.70 | Class Not Ranked | South Asian | 90.9% |
| 2010 | FL | 1850 | 3.58 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 97.7% |
| 2010 | NJ | 1820 | 3.49 | Top 10% | African-American | 59.4% |
| 2010 | FL | 1810 | 3.29 | Top 10% | African-American | 78.4% |
| 2010 | FL | 1770 | 3.94 | Class Not Ranked | Hispanic | 95.4% |
| 2010 | FL | 1760 | 3.78 | Top 2% | Hispanic | 95.9% |
| 2010 | (Private) | 1740 | 3.67 | Top 1% | Other | 85.5% |
| 2010 | FL | 1720 | 3.30 | Unknown | Caucasian | 85.6% |
| 2010 | IL | 33 | 3.62 | Top 15% | Caucasian | 98.0% |
| 2010 | FL | 33 | 3.60 | Top 10% | Native American | 98.9% |
| 2010 | FL | 32 | 3.40 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 100.0% |
| 2010 | CA | 32 | 3.81 | Unknown | Caucasian | 98.5% |
| 2010 | IL | 32 | 3.50 | Top 35% | Hispanic | 83.8% |
| 2010 | PA | 32 | 3.86 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 98.7% |
| 2010 | FL | 31 | 3.80 | Class Not Ranked | None Indicated | 99.5% |
| 2010 | NY | 31 | 3.94 | Class Not Ranked | East Asian | 98.6% |
| 2010 | (Private) | 31 | 3.46 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 93.7% |
| 2010 | IL | 31 | 3.41 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 92.7% |
| 2010 | MI | 31 | 3.59 | Top 30% | Caucasian | 94.2% |
| 2010 | CA | 29 | 3.50 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 89.4% |
| 2010 | FL | 29 | 4.00 | Valedictorian | East Asian | 99.7% |
| 2010 | IL | 28 | 3.40 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 79.6% |
| 2010 | FL | 28 | 3.60 | Top 10% | Hispanic | 94.0% |
| 2010 | FL | 27 | 3.47 | Top 1% | Hispanic | 89.9% |
| 2010 | NY | 27 | 3.90 | Top 10% | None Indicated | 94.4% |
| 2010 | CA | 26 | 3.50 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 74.5% |
| 2010 | MO | 25 | 3.50 | Top 1% | African-American | 51.4% |
| 2009 | FL | 2270 | 3.76 | Top 1% | East Asian | 99.9% |
| 2009 | FL | 2260 | 3.90 | Top 1% | Caucasian | 99.9% |
| 2009 | FL | 2240 | 3.99 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 99.9% |
| 2009 | PA | 2230 | 3.45 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 97.0% |
| 2009 | PA | 2200 | 3.85 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 99.3% |
| 2009 | FL | 2180 | 3.92 | Top 5% | South Asian | 99.9% |
| 2009 | (Private) | 2160 | 4.00 | Valedictorian | Caucasian | 99.9% |
| 2009 | FL | 2140 | 3.68 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 99.6% |
| 2009 | CT | 2140 | 3.83 | Top 1% | African-American | 97.1% |
| 2009 | WI | 2130 | 4.00 | Top 1% | East Asian | 99.7% |
| 2009 | NJ | 2130 | 3.70 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 97.6% |
| 2009 | NJ | 2130 | 3.30 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 92.7% |
| 2009 | FL | 2120 | 3.89 | Top 5% | Hispanic | 99.4% |
| 2009 | CA | 2120 | 3.77 | Class Not Ranked | Other | 98.2% |
| 2009 | FL | 2110 | 4.00 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 99.9% |
| 2009 | FL | 2100 | 3.90 | Top 5% | Hispanic | 99.3% |
| 2009 | FL | 2100 | 3.70 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 99.6% |
| 2009 | PA | 2090 | 3.70 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 97.3% |
| 2009 | (Private) | 2070 | 4.00 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 99.0% |
| 2009 | FL | 2070 | 4.00 | Top 1% | Caucasian | 99.8% |
| 2009 | (Private) | 2050 | 3.70 | Unknown | East Asian | 97.0% |
| 2009 | MA | 2050 | 3.20 | Class Not Ranked | East Asian | 86.7% |
| 2009 | PA | 2050 | 3.20 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 86.6% |
| 2009 | FL | 2050 | 2.88 | Top 30% | None Indicated | 100.0% |
| 2009 | VA | 2050 | 3.78 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 97.9% |
| 2009 | FL | 2040 | 3.70 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 100.0% |
| 2009 | FL | 2030 | 3.48 | Top 10% | African-American | 96.8% |
| 2009 | FL | 2030 | 3.92 | Top 1% | Hispanic | 99.3% |
| 2009 | NY | 2030 | 3.70 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 95.8% |
| 2009 | NJ | 2020 | 3.62 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 94.9% |
| 2009 | NY | 2010 | 3.80 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 97.5% |
| 2009 | OH | 2010 | 3.60 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 94.3% |
| 2009 | FL | 2000 | 3.69 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 100.0% |
| 2009 | (Private) | 2000 | 3.15 | Top 20% | Hispanic | 84.9% |
| 2009 | SC | 1990 | 3.57 | Top 10% | African-American | 88.8% |
| 2009 | WI | 1980 | 3.90 | Top 10% | South Asian | 99.3% |
| 2009 | FL | 1980 | 3.90 | Top 1% | Hispanic | 98.8% |
| 2009 | CA | 1970 | 3.27 | Class Not Ranked | East Asian | 82.1% |
| 2009 | MA | 1970 | 3.40 | Top 30% | Caucasian | 83.3% |
| 2009 | FL | 1960 | 4.00 | Valedictorian | East Asian | 99.7% |
| 2009 | GA | 1960 | 3.56 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 91.5% |
| 2009 | VA | 1960 | 4.00 | Top 1% | East Asian | 98.4% |
| 2009 | CA | 1950 | 3.50 | Unknown | Caucasian | 89.4% |
| 2009 | FL | 1930 | 3.70 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 98.8% |
| 2009 | FL | 1910 | 3.86 | Top 5% | Hispanic | 97.8% |
| 2009 | FL | 1900 | 3.50 | Top 10% | South Asian | 97.3% |
| 2009 | FL | 1890 | 3.40 | Bottom 50% | Caucasian | 91.0% |
| 2009 | NJ | 1890 | 3.60 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 90.2% |
| 2009 | PA | 1880 | 3.70 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 90.6% |
| 2009 | DE | 1870 | 3.60 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 92.1% |
| 2009 | NH | 1860 | 3.22 | Top 20% | African-American | 38.3% |
| 2009 | FL | 1840 | 3.13 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 95.9% |
| 2009 | SC | 1840 | 3.20 | Top 30% | Caucasian | 55.2% |
| 2009 | NJ | 1820 | 3.43 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 76.3% |
| 2009 | NY | 1810 | 3.85 | Top 1% | Hispanic | 84.0% |
| 2009 | (Private) | 1790 | 3.45 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 74.3% |
| 2009 | FL | 1770 | 3.81 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 99.0% |
| 2009 | FL | 1740 | 3.80 | Valedictorian | Caucasian | 97.9% |
| 2009 | FL | 1700 | 3.00 | Top 5% | Hispanic | 58.3% |
| 2009 | FL | 1670 | 3.75 | Valedictorian | Caucasian | 100.0% |
| 2009 | PA | 1660 | 3.80 | Top 40% | Caucasian | 70.3% |
| 2009 | XX | 1600 | 3.50 | Unknown | East Asian | 52.8% |
| 2009 | CT | 1590 | 3.25 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 32.4% |
| 2009 | FL | 1500 | 3.32 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 100.0% |
| 2009 | NY | 1080 | 3.90 | Top 1% | Hispanic | 67.4% |
| 2009 | VA | 33 | 3.75 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 98.7% |
| 2009 | CT | 33 | 3.50 | Top 30% | Caucasian | 96.1% |
| 2009 | TX | 30 | 3.20 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 82.2% |
| 2009 | DC | 29 | 3.70 | Top 10% | None Indicated | 94.7% |
| 2009 | FL | 28 | 3.98 | Top 1% | Caucasian | 99.5% |
| 2009 | AZ | 28 | 3.83 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 95.5% |
| 2008 | NY | 2340 | 4.00 | Salutatorian | Caucasian | 99.8% |
| 2008 | MA | 2340 | 3.10 | Unknown | Hispanic | 88.3% |
| 2008 | NJ | 2270 | 3.50 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 98.0% |
| 2008 | IL | 2200 | 3.95 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 99.5% |
| 2008 | VA | 2200 | 3.90 | Unknown | East Asian | 99.2% |
| 2008 | FL | 2170 | 3.95 | Top 5% | South Asian | 99.9% |
| 2008 | FL | 2140 | 3.93 | Top 1% | None Indicated | 99.9% |
| 2008 | FL | 2130 | 3.80 | Top 5% | Other | 99.7% |
| 2008 | FL | 2040 | 3.30 | Bottom 50% | Hispanic | 85.5% |
| 2008 | FL | 2020 | 3.93 | Unknown | Hispanic | 98.8% |
| 2008 | MD | 2000 | 3.67 | Unknown | Caucasian | 95.1% |
| 2008 | FL | 1940 | 3.80 | Unknown | Native American | 97.2% |
| 2008 | XX | 1940 | 3.80 | Top 5% | Hispanic | 89.8% |
| 2008 | FL | 1880 | 3.90 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 99.7% |
| 2008 | FL | 1720 | 3.00 | Top 5% | African-American | 48.9% |
| 2008 | FL | 1320 | 3.50 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 98.3% |
| 2008 | FL | 30 | 3.71 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 99.2% |
| 2008 | IN | 32 | 3.75 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 98.2% |
| 2008 | FL | 31 | 3.40 | Top 20% | Hispanic | 94.9% |
| 2008 | (Private) | 30 | 3.90 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 99.5% |
| 2008 | WI | 28 | 3.96 | Top 5% | None Indicated | 97.0% |
| 2008 | FL | 27 | 3.85 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 98.6% |
| 2007 | MI | 2260 | 3.46 | Top 10% | None Indicated | 98.1% |
| 2007 | FL | 2100 | 4.00 | Unknown | Hispanic | 99.4% |
| 2007 | FL | 1860 | 3.80 | Class Not Ranked | Hispanic | 95.7% |
| 2007 | GA | 1810 | 3.60 | Unknown | Caucasian | 83.8% |
| 2007 | MD | 1700 | 3.37 | Unknown | Caucasian | 57.1% |
| 2006 | MI | 29 | 3.57 | Unknown | Caucasian | 91.4% |
|
| 2010 | CA | 1990 | 3.40 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 88.5% |
| 2010 | RI | 1960 | 3.40 | Class Not Ranked | None Indicated | 86.6% |
| 2010 | FL | 1900 | 3.40 | Class Not Ranked | Hispanic | 100.0% |
| 2010 | MD | 1810 | 3.86 | Top 10% | South Asian | 93.7% |
| 2010 | (Private) | 32 | 2.90 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 78.0% |
| 2009 | MO | 2080 | 3.38 | Class Not Ranked | None Indicated | 92.4% |
| 2009 | VA | 2020 | 3.70 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 95.5% |
| 2009 | (Private) | 1780 | 3.30 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 62.5% |
| 2009 | NC | 1600 | 3.50 | Top 10% | Hispanic | 38.0% |
| 2008 | CA | 1850 | 3.89 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 94.9% |
| 2008 | NJ | 1770 | 3.30 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 61.3% |
| 2008 | NY | 31 | 3.64 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 96.4% |
|
|
| 2010 | MA | 2400 | 4.00 | Valedictorian | Caucasian | 99.9% |
| 2010 | NY | 1840 | 3.20 | Class Not Ranked | Hispanic | 36.6% |
| 2010 | AR | 1780 | 3.23 | Top 40% | Caucasian | 50.8% |
| 2010 | MD | 1770 | 3.40 | Top 30% | Caucasian | 61.0% |
| 2010 | FL | 1700 | 3.00 | Top 35% | Caucasian | 100.0% |
| 2010 | FL | 1520 | 3.75 | Top 10% | Hispanic | 74.9% |
| 2010 | FL | 30 | 3.17 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 95.5% |
| 2010 | FL | 29 | 3.00 | Class Not Ranked | African-American | 74.4% |
| 2009 | NY | 2040 | 3.50 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 94.1% |
| 2009 | MA | 2030 | 3.96 | Salutatorian | Caucasian | 98.8% |
| 2009 | NC | 1860 | 2.76 | Unknown | Caucasian | 32.3% |
| 2009 | CA | 1800 | 3.40 | Unknown | Caucasian | 72.2% |
| 2009 | RI | 1760 | 3.30 | Top 30% | Caucasian | 52.0% |
| 2009 | NC | 1740 | 2.70 | Top 40% | African-American | 3.7% |
| 2009 | IL | 1710 | 3.98 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 93.0% |
| 2008 | MA | 2050 | 3.30 | Unknown | Hispanic | 72.7% |
| 2008 | MD | 1760 | 3.48 | Unknown | Caucasian | 79.9% |
| 2008 | FL | 1710 | 2.96 | Bottom 50% | African-American | 22.9% |
| 2008 | TX | 1610 | 3.50 | Top 30% | African-American | 22.4% |
| 2008 | VA | 1610 | 3.00 | Class Not Ranked | South Asian | 19.6% |
| 2008 | CA | 1590 | 3.00 | Unknown | African-American | 6.8% |
| 2008 | CA | 1590 | 3.00 | Class Not Ranked | African-American | 6.8% |
| 2007 | NY | 1860 | 3.20 | Top 40% | Caucasian | 52.8% |
|
| 2011 | IL | 2230 | 3.50 | Top 25% | Caucasian | 97.1% |
| 2011 | PA | 2210 | 3.50 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 97.7% |
| 2011 | FL | 1520 | 3.87 | Valedictorian | Other | 99.9% |
| 2010 | FL | 2370 | 4.00 | Valedictorian | Caucasian | 100.0% |
| 2010 | TX | 2280 | 3.50 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 98.1% |
| 2010 | NJ | 2250 | 4.00 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 99.6% |
| 2010 | XX | 2240 | 3.97 | Valedictorian | East Asian | 99.6% |
| 2010 | VA | 2220 | 4.00 | Salutatorian | Caucasian | 99.6% |
| 2010 | FL | 2210 | 4.00 | Top 10% | Hispanic | 100.0% |
| 2010 | VA | 2200 | 4.00 | Salutatorian | Caucasian | 99.6% |
| 2010 | CA | 2170 | 3.57 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 97.4% |
| 2010 | NY | 2160 | 3.90 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 99.1% |
| 2010 | CT | 2150 | 3.90 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 99.1% |
| 2010 | (Private) | 2150 | 3.40 | Class Not Ranked | East Asian | 95.2% |
| 2010 | FL | 2130 | 3.97 | Top 5% | East Asian | 99.9% |
| 2010 | FL | 2110 | 3.90 | Top 2% | Caucasian | 99.8% |
| 2010 | FL | 2100 | 3.70 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 99.4% |
| 2010 | FL | 2090 | 3.56 | Top 25% | East Asian | 98.9% |
| 2010 | NY | 2080 | 3.91 | Valedictorian | Caucasian | 98.9% |
| 2010 | FL | 2070 | 3.70 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 100.0% |
| 2010 | CA | 2070 | 4.00 | Class Not Ranked | Other | 98.8% |
| 2010 | NC | 2060 | 3.67 | Top 4% | Caucasian | 97.4% |
| 2010 | PA | 2060 | 3.95 | Top 1% | Caucasian | 98.9% |
| 2010 | VA | 2060 | 3.40 | Top 30% | Caucasian | 89.4% |
| 2010 | MA | 2050 | 3.00 | Top 25% | Caucasian | 71.0% |
| 2010 | XX | 2050 | 3.95 | Class Not Ranked | Other | 98.4% |
| 2010 | NJ | 2050 | 4.00 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 98.9% |
| 2010 | XX | 2040 | 4.00 | Top 5% | East Asian | 99.0% |
| 2010 | TX | 2040 | 3.55 | Top 15% | South Asian | 94.3% |
| 2010 | CA | 2040 | 3.38 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 90.7% |
| 2010 | NC | 2040 | 3.64 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 95.7% |
| 2010 | FL | 2030 | 3.75 | Top 25% | Caucasian | 99.3% |
| 2010 | CT | 2030 | 3.25 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 85.9% |
| 2010 | NC | 2030 | 3.67 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 95.9% |
| 2010 | MA | 2030 | 3.67 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 96.7% |
| 2010 | KY | 2020 | 3.83 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 98.4% |
| 2010 | FL | 2020 | 3.70 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 99.1% |
| 2010 | NJ | 2020 | 3.98 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 98.3% |
| 2010 | NJ | 2010 | 3.40 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 89.7% |
| 2010 | MA | 2010 | 3.60 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 94.8% |
| 2010 | PA | 2010 | 3.85 | Top 20% | East Asian | 97.0% |
| 2010 | NJ | 2000 | 3.37 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 95.7% |
| 2010 | PA | 1990 | 3.90 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 98.8% |
| 2010 | MD | 1990 | 3.40 | Class Not Ranked | Hispanic | 80.5% |
| 2010 | MA | 1990 | 3.70 | Unknown | Caucasian | 95.3% |
| 2010 | FL | 1970 | 3.80 | Top 3% | Caucasian | 99.4% |
| 2010 | XX | 1970 | 2.80 | Unknown | Middle-Eastern | 50.7% |
| 2010 | NY | 1970 | 3.17 | Bottom 50% | Caucasian | 60.7% |
| 2010 | NC | 1960 | 2.90 | Bottom 30% | Caucasian | 28.2% |
| 2010 | FL | 1950 | 3.30 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 95.7% |
| 2010 | XX | 1940 | 3.60 | Top 10% | East Asian | 92.5% |
| 2010 | CA | 1940 | 3.44 | Top 35% | Caucasian | 81.0% |
| 2010 | CA | 1930 | 3.56 | Top 15% | Native American | 87.3% |
| 2010 | MI | 1910 | 3.85 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 94.9% |
| 2010 | NJ | 1910 | 3.37 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 80.0% |
| 2010 | CA | 1890 | 3.98 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 97.2% |
| 2010 | CT | 1880 | 3.70 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 91.5% |
| 2010 | WA | 1880 | 3.57 | Top 30% | Caucasian | 83.6% |
| 2010 | MD | 1870 | 3.57 | Top 30% | Caucasian | 82.7% |
| 2010 | FL | 1860 | 3.00 | Unknown | Hispanic | 63.4% |
| 2010 | (Private) | 1860 | 4.00 | Top 3% | Caucasian | 97.0% |
| 2010 | NJ | 1850 | 3.24 | Class Not Ranked | African-American | 41.3% |
| 2010 | FL | 1840 | 3.09 | Unknown | Caucasian | 85.9% |
| 2010 | MA | 1840 | 3.30 | Top 15% | Caucasian | 70.2% |
| 2010 | GA | 1830 | 3.70 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 88.9% |
| 2010 | FL | 1820 | 3.52 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 96.2% |
| 2010 | FL | 1820 | 3.70 | Top 15% | Caucasian | 97.5% |
| 2010 | NJ | 1820 | 3.36 | Class Not Ranked | East Asian | 72.0% |
| 2010 | GA | 1810 | 3.70 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 88.8% |
| 2010 | FL | 1790 | 3.56 | Top 10% | Hispanic | 96.5% |
| 2010 | NJ | 1790 | 3.50 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 77.2% |
| 2010 | (Private) | 1780 | 4.00 | Top 1% | Caucasian | 95.5% |
| 2010 | FL | 1770 | 3.50 | Unknown | African-American | 83.5% |
| 2010 | FL | 1720 | 3.78 | Top 15% | Caucasian | 99.0% |
| 2010 | XX | 1690 | 3.00 | Class Not Ranked | South Asian | 27.6% |
| 2010 | NJ | 1690 | 3.83 | Top 15% | Caucasian | 84.3% |
| 2010 | FL | 1680 | 3.38 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 87.2% |
| 2010 | XX | 1660 | 4.00 | Top 10% | Hispanic | 74.4% |
| 2010 | MO | 1650 | 3.58 | Top 40% | African-American | 27.3% |
| 2010 | FL | 1640 | 3.20 | Top 30% | Caucasian | 81.9% |
| 2010 | FL | 1640 | 3.56 | Top 10% | Hispanic | 78.9% |
| 2010 | FL | 1640 | 3.76 | Top 5% | Hispanic | 88.7% |
| 2010 | MD | 1640 | 3.18 | Class Not Ranked | African-American | 14.7% |
| 2010 | FL | 1600 | 3.50 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 92.1% |
| 2010 | FL | 1520 | 3.38 | Top 10% | Other | 100.0% |
| 2010 | FL | 1500 | 3.00 | Top 35% | Caucasian | 29.3% |
| 2010 | FL | 1430 | 3.28 | Top 10% | Hispanic | 28.4% |
| 2010 | FL | 1400 | 3.03 | Top 25% | Other | 27.0% |
| 2010 | FL | 1390 | 3.20 | Unknown | Caucasian | 99.9% |
| 2010 | VA | 1330 | 3.50 | Top 15% | Caucasian | 19.0% |
| 2010 | MO | 35 | 4.00 | Valedictorian | Caucasian | 99.8% |
| 2010 | TN | 35 | 4.00 | Top 2% | Caucasian | 99.8% |
| 2010 | GA | 34 | 3.70 | Top 20% | African-American | 96.7% |
| 2010 | NY | 34 | 4.00 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 99.7% |
| 2010 | IL | 31 | 3.78 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 97.9% |
| 2010 | IL | 31 | 3.50 | Class Not Ranked | East Asian | 94.4% |
| 2010 | IL | 30 | 3.00 | Top 40% | Caucasian | 58.4% |
| 2010 | IL | 29 | 3.65 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 92.4% |
| 2010 | FL | 29 | 3.96 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 99.5% |
| 2010 | TX | 28 | 3.65 | Top 30% | Caucasian | 87.4% |
| 2010 | FL | 28 | 3.90 | Top 5% | Hispanic | 97.8% |
| 2010 | FL | 28 | 3.70 | Top 15% | Caucasian | 100.0% |
| 2010 | MD | 27 | 2.90 | Unknown | Caucasian | 38.5% |
| 2010 | CA | 27 | 3.43 | Top 30% | Caucasian | 70.9% |
| 2010 | FL | 26 | 3.30 | Top 25% | Hispanic | 70.1% |
| 2010 | NY | 22 | 3.40 | Top 35% | Hispanic | 11.4% |
| 2010 | NY | 21 | 3.20 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 18.2% |
| 2010 | FL | 20 | 3.50 | Top 5% | Hispanic | 46.3% |
| 2009 | FL | 2350 | 4.00 | Top 1% | Hispanic | 99.9% |
| 2009 | FL | 2170 | 3.90 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 99.8% |
| 2009 | FL | 2120 | 4.00 | Top 1% | Hispanic | 99.6% |
| 2009 | MD | 2110 | 3.95 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 99.5% |
| 2009 | CT | 2070 | 3.80 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 97.8% |
| 2009 | PA | 2060 | 2.70 | Bottom 40% | Caucasian | 99.9% |
| 2009 | NY | 2050 | 3.35 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 93.0% |
| 2009 | NY | 2040 | 3.50 | Unknown | Caucasian | 93.4% |
| 2009 | MD | 2020 | 3.72 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 95.8% |
| 2009 | FL | 2010 | 4.00 | Top 10% | Hispanic | 99.1% |
| 2009 | XX | 2010 | 3.62 | Unknown | East Asian | 94.6% |
| 2009 | CT | 2010 | 3.06 | Unknown | Caucasian | 74.7% |
| 2009 | FL | 1990 | 3.50 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 98.8% |
| 2009 | AL | 1970 | 3.93 | Top 10% | East Asian | 97.7% |
| 2009 | NY | 1970 | 2.90 | Class Not Ranked | Hispanic | 32.2% |
| 2009 | MO | 1960 | 3.86 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 98.3% |
| 2009 | FL | 1960 | 3.20 | Top 30% | Hispanic | 80.6% |
| 2009 | MA | 1940 | 3.70 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 94.4% |
| 2009 | FL | 1920 | 3.13 | Top 20% | Hispanic | 76.8% |
| 2009 | TX | 1920 | 3.35 | Top 30% | Hispanic | 51.6% |
| 2009 | NY | 1910 | 3.60 | Unknown | None Indicated | 90.3% |
| 2009 | PA | 1910 | 3.90 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 96.8% |
| 2009 | FL | 1900 | 3.94 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 99.4% |
| 2009 | NY | 1900 | 3.60 | Unknown | Caucasian | 89.7% |
| 2009 | FL | 1890 | 4.00 | Top 5% | Hispanic | 100.0% |
| 2009 | MD | 1880 | 4.00 | Valedictorian | African-American | 92.9% |
| 2009 | XX | 1870 | 3.75 | Top 10% | East Asian | 92.9% |
| 2009 | MA | 1860 | 3.88 | Top 10% | Hispanic | 86.4% |
| 2009 | NC | 1860 | 3.80 | Top 30% | Caucasian | 90.4% |
| 2009 | CA | 1850 | 3.65 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 87.4% |
| 2009 | NY | 1840 | 3.66 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 88.1% |
| 2009 | NY | 1840 | 3.50 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 81.7% |
| 2009 | PA | 1830 | 4.00 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 94.9% |
| 2009 | VA | 1830 | 3.92 | Top 5% | East Asian | 95.3% |
| 2009 | IL | 1810 | 3.60 | Unknown | Caucasian | 83.8% |
| 2009 | NJ | 1800 | 3.40 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 72.2% |
| 2009 | WA | 1790 | 3.89 | Top 10% | East Asian | 92.9% |
| 2009 | FL | 1780 | 3.71 | Top 20% | Other | 98.1% |
| 2009 | NJ | 1760 | 3.52 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 81.9% |
| 2009 | FL | 1760 | 3.85 | Top 10% | Hispanic | 94.2% |
| 2009 | FL | 1750 | 2.94 | Top 30% | Caucasian | 61.7% |
| 2009 | FL | 1740 | 3.80 | Top 5% | East Asian | 99.3% |
| 2009 | FL | 1740 | 3.75 | Top 5% | Hispanic | 92.2% |
| 2009 | NJ | 1740 | 3.00 | Class Not Ranked | Hispanic | 14.7% |
| 2009 | FL | 1730 | 3.43 | Top 10% | South Asian | 91.5% |
| 2009 | MA | 1720 | 3.40 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 59.3% |
| 2009 | NC | 1720 | 3.75 | Top 20% | Hispanic | 59.8% |
| 2009 | NJ | 1700 | 3.35 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 70.2% |
| 2009 | OH | 1670 | 3.57 | Top 40% | South Asian | 54.9% |
| 2009 | MD | 1670 | 3.82 | Top 5% | Hispanic | 66.3% |
| 2009 | GA | 1640 | 4.00 | Top 30% | Other | 83.4% |
| 2009 | FL | 1630 | 3.95 | Unknown | Hispanic | 92.0% |
| 2009 | FL | 1470 | 3.32 | Top 20% | African-American | 31.1% |
| 2009 | FL | 1360 | 3.86 | Top 10% | Hispanic | 63.2% |
| 2009 | NY | 35 | 3.96 | Top 5% | None Indicated | 99.8% |
| 2009 | FL | 32 | 3.70 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 99.6% |
| 2009 | VA | 32 | 3.90 | Valedictorian | Caucasian | 99.2% |
| 2009 | TN | 30 | 3.79 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 96.4% |
| 2009 | DC | 29 | 3.80 | Top 10% | Hispanic | 89.2% |
| 2009 | NJ | 29 | 3.50 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 89.4% |
| 2009 | MN | 29 | 3.55 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 100.0% |
| 2009 | MI | 28 | 3.64 | Unknown | Caucasian | 90.3% |
| 2009 | CO | 28 | 3.80 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 94.6% |
| 2009 | FL | 27 | 4.00 | Unknown | South Asian | 99.1% |
| 2009 | CA | 26 | 3.70 | Unknown | Caucasian | 86.1% |
| 2009 | TX | 26 | 3.80 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 88.4% |
| 2009 | IL | 25 | 3.43 | Top 10% | African-American | 41.0% |
| 2009 | NC | 25 | 3.50 | Top 30% | Caucasian | 62.4% |
| 2009 | FL | 24 | 3.20 | Top 10% | African-American | 54.3% |
| 2008 | PA | 2270 | 3.65 | Top 20% | East Asian | 98.7% |
| 2008 | FL | 2260 | 4.00 | Valedictorian | East Asian | 100.0% |
| 2008 | NJ | 2240 | 3.43 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 97.3% |
| 2008 | XX | 2230 | 3.50 | Class Not Ranked | Other | 97.7% |
| 2008 | CT | 2230 | 3.40 | Unknown | Caucasian | 96.9% |
| 2008 | FL | 2230 | 4.00 | Salutatorian | Hispanic | 99.8% |
| 2008 | FL | 2220 | 4.00 | Top 5% | Hispanic | 99.8% |
| 2008 | FL | 2210 | 3.95 | Class Not Ranked | Hispanic | 99.6% |
| 2008 | FL | 2200 | 3.99 | Top 1% | East Asian | 99.9% |
| 2008 | PA | 2180 | 3.90 | Top 5% | None Indicated | 99.3% |
| 2008 | VA | 2170 | 3.25 | Top 30% | Caucasian | 90.7% |
| 2008 | FL | 2170 | 3.80 | Unknown | African-American | 99.2% |
| 2008 | CT | 2160 | 3.60 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 97.2% |
| 2008 | XX | 2130 | 3.81 | Top 5% | None Indicated | 98.8% |
| 2008 | MD | 2100 | 3.40 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 93.6% |
| 2008 | NJ | 2060 | 3.47 | Unknown | Caucasian | 93.6% |
| 2008 | FL | 2030 | 4.00 | Top 1% | Caucasian | 99.9% |
| 2008 | FL | 1990 | 3.50 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 98.4% |
| 2008 | NJ | 1990 | 3.79 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 96.8% |
| 2008 | NJ | 1980 | 3.02 | Unknown | Caucasian | 68.6% |
| 2008 | FL | 1950 | 3.30 | Top 10% | Hispanic | 89.4% |
| 2008 | VA | 1940 | 3.30 | Unknown | Other | 81.0% |
| 2008 | GA | 1930 | 3.65 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 92.4% |
| 2008 | VA | 1900 | 3.68 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 93.3% |
| 2008 | NY | 1890 | 3.70 | Top 10% | None Indicated | 92.7% |
| 2008 | (Private) | 1850 | 3.65 | Top 30% | Caucasian | 84.7% |
| 2008 | CA | 1820 | 3.25 | Unknown | Other | 64.5% |
| 2008 | FL | 1810 | 3.96 | Top 1% | Hispanic | 98.4% |
| 2008 | NY | 1790 | 3.80 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 88.7% |
| 2008 | NY | 1770 | 4.00 | Unknown | Hispanic | 87.5% |
| 2008 | VA | 1770 | 3.70 | Top 10% | Hispanic | 68.0% |
| 2008 | FL | 1750 | 3.20 | Top 20% | Other | 91.2% |
| 2008 | NY | 1730 | 3.70 | Top 30% | Caucasian | 76.5% |
| 2008 | NY | 1710 | 3.00 | Unknown | African-American | 12.7% |
| 2008 | FL | 1630 | 3.45 | Top 5% | Middle-Eastern | 87.6% |
| 2008 | FL | 1610 | 3.40 | Unknown | Caucasian | 81.4% |
| 2008 | GA | 1520 | 3.50 | Top 20% | African-American | 17.7% |
| 2008 | GA | 1520 | 3.50 | Top 20% | African-American | 17.7% |
| 2008 | FL | 1480 | 3.65 | Top 5% | South Asian | 89.2% |
| 2008 | FL | 33 | 4.00 | Class Not Ranked | Hispanic | 99.6% |
| 2008 | IL | 32 | 3.60 | Top 10% | Hispanic | 92.5% |
| 2008 | NY | 32 | 3.90 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 99.1% |
| 2008 | OK | 31 | 3.85 | Valedictorian | Caucasian | 98.6% |
| 2008 | XX | 29 | 3.45 | Unknown | South Asian | 87.8% |
| 2008 | NY | 28 | 3.70 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 91.9% |
| 2008 | NY | 26 | 3.65 | Top 20% | None Indicated | 82.5% |
| 2007 | RI | 2060 | 3.81 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 98.2% |
| 2007 | FL | 1940 | 3.30 | Top 20% | Hispanic | 86.5% |
| 2007 | FL | 1890 | 3.50 | Top 10% | Hispanic | 91.9% |
| 2007 | IA | 32 | 3.65 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 97.2% |
| 2007 | FL | 29 | 2.90 | Unknown | Caucasian | 86.3% |
|
| 2012 | FL | 2200 | 4.00 | Unknown | Native American | 99.7% |
| 2012 | GA | 2180 | 3.80 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 98.9% |
| 2012 | FL | 2120 | 3.70 | Top 3% | Caucasian | 99.6% |
| 2012 | NY | 2090 | 3.40 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 94.6% |
| 2012 | FL | 2020 | 3.00 | Top 25% | Caucasian | 91.2% |
| 2012 | FL | 2010 | 3.75 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 99.4% |
| 2012 | NJ | 2000 | 3.70 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 95.1% |
| 2012 | MD | 1920 | 4.00 | Top 1% | Caucasian | 97.9% |
| 2012 | FL | 1910 | 3.90 | Top 10% | Hispanic | 97.9% |
| 2012 | PA | 1870 | 4.00 | Top 1% | Caucasian | 97.6% |
| 2012 | KS | 1870 | 4.00 | Valedictorian | East Asian | 97.3% |
| 2012 | PA | 1810 | 3.20 | Class Not Ranked | Hispanic | 32.7% |
| 2012 | NJ | 1700 | 3.10 | Top 20% | Hispanic | 14.5% |
| 2012 | WA | 1420 | 3.93 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 63.4% |
| 2012 | AL | 33 | 3.75 | Top 5% | South Asian | 98.9% |
| 2012 | IN | 32 | 3.86 | Top 4% | Other | 99.0% |
| 2012 | WI | 31 | 3.96 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 98.8% |
| 2012 | SC | 26 | 3.80 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 90.5% |
| 2012 | FL | 23 | 3.70 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 91.7% |
| 2011 | FL | 2350 | 4.00 | Top 1% | Caucasian | 100.0% |
| 2011 | FL | 2260 | 3.85 | Class Not Ranked | South Asian | 99.9% |
| 2011 | (Private) | 2250 | 3.88 | Unknown | East Asian | 99.4% |
| 2011 | XX | 2250 | 3.75 | Top 10% | None Indicated | 99.2% |
| 2011 | FL | 2240 | 4.00 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 99.9% |
| 2011 | GA | 2220 | 4.00 | Top 1% | African-American | 98.9% |
| 2011 | MI | 2190 | 4.00 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 99.8% |
| 2011 | CT | 2190 | 3.85 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 99.1% |
| 2011 | FL | 2180 | 4.00 | Valedictorian | Caucasian | 99.9% |
| 2011 | OH | 2180 | 3.63 | Class Not Ranked | Hispanic | 94.2% |
| 2011 | WI | 2170 | 3.50 | Top 30% | East Asian | 95.6% |
| 2011 | FL | 2170 | 3.65 | Top 20% | African-American | 98.7% |
| 2011 | FL | 2160 | 3.80 | Top 3% | Caucasian | 99.8% |
| 2011 | FL | 2140 | 4.00 | Valedictorian | Hispanic | 100.0% |
| 2011 | FL | 2140 | 3.70 | Top 10% | Other | 99.6% |
| 2011 | IA | 2140 | 3.73 | Top 15% | Caucasian | 98.1% |
| 2011 | FL | 2140 | 4.00 | Valedictorian | East Asian | 99.9% |
| 2011 | MI | 2140 | 3.85 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 98.8% |
| 2011 | MI | 2130 | 3.94 | Class Not Ranked | South Asian | 99.8% |
| 2011 | NJ | 2120 | 3.69 | Top 15% | Caucasian | 97.7% |
| 2011 | NY | 2110 | 3.90 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 99.0% |
| 2011 | FL | 2110 | 3.27 | Top 1% | Hispanic | 95.9% |
| 2011 | CA | 2100 | 3.20 | Unknown | East Asian | 92.9% |
| 2011 | NY | 2100 | 3.20 | Unknown | Hispanic | 72.2% |
| 2011 | NJ | 2100 | 3.00 | Bottom 50% | Caucasian | 65.4% |
| 2011 | NM | 2100 | 3.28 | Top 15% | African-American | 77.1% |
| 2011 | MD | 2100 | 3.89 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 98.9% |
| 2011 | NV | 2100 | 4.00 | Unknown | Caucasian | 99.0% |
| 2011 | KY | 2090 | 3.80 | Top 5% | Other | 99.1% |
| 2011 | FL | 2080 | 3.88 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 99.7% |
| 2011 | OH | 2070 | 3.86 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 98.3% |
| 2011 | FL | 2070 | 3.80 | Top 3% | Hispanic | 99.0% |
| 2011 | GA | 2060 | 3.60 | Top 25% | Caucasian | 94.9% |
| 2011 | MA | 2060 | 3.04 | Unknown | Caucasian | 78.8% |
| 2011 | XX | 2040 | 3.78 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 97.5% |
| 2011 | FL | 2040 | 3.75 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 99.4% |
| 2011 | MA | 2020 | 3.50 | Unknown | South Asian | 92.7% |
| 2011 | NY | 2010 | 3.68 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 95.0% |
| 2011 | PA | 2010 | 3.80 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 97.2% |
| 2011 | NJ | 2010 | 3.75 | Top 15% | Caucasian | 96.4% |
| 2011 | NY | 2000 | 3.68 | Top 25% | South Asian | 98.0% |
| 2011 | FL | 2000 | 3.77 | Unknown | South Asian | 99.6% |
| 2011 | FL | 1990 | 3.40 | Unknown | Hispanic | 96.7% |
| 2011 | MO | 1990 | 2.80 | Bottom 40% | Caucasian | 29.7% |
| 2011 | NY | 1990 | 3.05 | Class Not Ranked | Hispanic | 46.0% |
| 2011 | SC | 1970 | 3.65 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 98.4% |
| 2011 | PA | 1960 | 3.40 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 86.6% |
| 2011 | CA | 1950 | 3.30 | Class Not Ranked | South Asian | 81.8% |
| 2011 | NV | 1950 | 3.50 | Unknown | Caucasian | 89.4% |
| 2011 | NJ | 1920 | 3.60 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 90.7% |
| 2011 | OH | 1910 | 3.20 | Top 35% | Caucasian | 62.6% |
| 2011 | MA | 1910 | 3.64 | Top 15% | Other | 91.4% |
| 2011 | NY | 1910 | 3.00 | Class Not Ranked | African-American | 31.6% |
| 2011 | NJ | 1890 | 3.45 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 85.1% |
| 2011 | NC | 1880 | 3.66 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 91.4% |
| 2011 | NV | 1860 | 2.80 | Unknown | Caucasian | 35.2% |
| 2011 | MA | 1860 | 3.80 | Top 15% | Caucasian | 92.9% |
| 2011 | CA | 1860 | 3.39 | Top 25% | Caucasian | 74.0% |
| 2011 | FL | 1850 | 3.20 | Bottom 50% | Caucasian | 81.0% |
| 2011 | FL | 1840 | 3.60 | Top 10% | South Asian | 97.9% |
| 2011 | NY | 1840 | 3.52 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 84.2% |
| 2011 | FL | 1830 | 3.50 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 96.0% |
| 2011 | CT | 1820 | 3.00 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 45.0% |
| 2011 | CA | 1800 | 3.50 | Top 20% | East Asian | 91.5% |
| 2011 | PA | 1800 | 3.50 | Top 30% | Caucasian | 85.9% |
| 2011 | (Private) | 1800 | 3.60 | Top 30% | Caucasian | 89.3% |
| 2011 | NJ | 1800 | 3.30 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 62.8% |
| 2011 | FL | 1800 | 3.50 | Unknown | Caucasian | 94.7% |
| 2011 | NY | 1770 | 3.78 | Unknown | Caucasian | 91.2% |
| 2011 | NJ | 1760 | 3.90 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 91.0% |
| 2011 | MD | 1750 | 3.30 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 61.1% |
| 2011 | MD | 1690 | 3.65 | Top 25% | Caucasian | 70.8% |
| 2011 | PA | 1690 | 3.30 | Class Not Ranked | East Asian | 49.8% |
| 2011 | NJ | 1680 | 3.00 | Top 30% | Caucasian | 38.2% |
| 2011 | CA | 1680 | 3.20 | Unknown | Other | 40.7% |
| 2011 | FL | 1670 | 3.80 | Unknown | Hispanic | 88.1% |
| 2011 | FL | 1650 | 3.00 | Unknown | Hispanic | 34.0% |
| 2011 | CA | 1600 | 3.70 | Unknown | East Asian | 67.9% |
| 2011 | NJ | 1600 | 3.50 | Top 30% | Caucasian | 44.5% |
| 2011 | MD | 1570 | 3.14 | Bottom 50% | South Asian | 12.1% |
| 2011 | CA | 1550 | 3.34 | Unknown | Caucasian | 58.1% |
| 2011 | PA | 1530 | 3.68 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 59.8% |
| 2011 | NY | 1520 | 3.70 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 57.4% |
| 2011 | GA | 1500 | 3.67 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 75.8% |
| 2011 | MD | 1480 | 3.73 | Top 15% | South Asian | 53.8% |
| 2011 | CA | 1470 | 3.66 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 46.9% |
| 2011 | FL | 1460 | 3.10 | Top 25% | Hispanic | 16.0% |
| 2011 | MD | 1440 | 4.00 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 73.2% |
| 2011 | NJ | 1350 | 3.00 | Bottom 50% | Caucasian | 5.2% |
| 2011 | FL | 1310 | 3.64 | Unknown | Hispanic | 35.9% |
| 2011 | OH | 36 | 3.95 | Top 10% | None Indicated | 99.8% |
| 2011 | FL | 31 | 3.82 | Top 3% | Other | 99.7% |
| 2011 | PA | 30 | 3.20 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 82.2% |
| 2011 | IL | 29 | 3.50 | Top 1% | Caucasian | 92.0% |
| 2011 | MI | 28 | 3.50 | Top 20% | Middle-Eastern | 84.3% |
| 2011 | CO | 27 | 3.30 | Top 25% | Hispanic | 37.7% |
| 2011 | OH | 26 | 3.40 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 70.4% |
| 2011 | FL | 22 | 3.44 | Top 10% | Hispanic | 56.0% |
| 2011 | FL | 21 | 3.34 | Unknown | Caucasian | 63.6% |
| 2010 | FL | 2400 | 3.82 | Top 1% | Hispanic | 99.9% |
| 2010 | OH | 2400 | 4.00 | Top 5% | African-American | 99.6% |
| 2010 | NJ | 2400 | 4.00 | Valedictorian | Hispanic | 99.6% |
| 2010 | CA | 2400 | 3.75 | Top 10% | None Indicated | 99.6% |
| 2010 | CO | 2370 | 3.90 | Class Not Ranked | African-American | 99.1% |
| 2010 | CA | 2350 | 4.00 | Valedictorian | Caucasian | 99.8% |
| 2010 | FL | 2350 | 3.90 | Top 15% | South Asian | 99.9% |
| 2010 | NY | 2320 | 3.85 | Top 5% | East Asian | 99.6% |
| 2010 | FL | 2250 | 3.90 | Top 5% | Hispanic | 99.7% |
| 2010 | NJ | 2250 | 3.60 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 98.5% |
| 2010 | NY | 2240 | 3.50 | Top 30% | Middle-Eastern | 97.0% |
| 2010 | FL | 2230 | 4.00 | Valedictorian | East Asian | 100.0% |
| 2010 | GA | 2230 | 3.80 | Top 10% | South Asian | 99.2% |
| 2010 | MD | 2230 | 3.76 | Top 15% | Caucasian | 99.0% |
| 2010 | NC | 2230 | 3.80 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 99.0% |
| 2010 | MD | 2220 | 3.02 | Bottom 50% | Caucasian | 80.1% |
| 2010 | MD | 2210 | 3.30 | Top 25% | Caucasian | 94.2% |
| 2010 | MA | 2210 | 3.60 | Unknown | East Asian | 98.1% |
| 2010 | PA | 2200 | 4.00 | Valedictorian | Caucasian | 99.6% |
| 2010 | FL | 2190 | 3.70 | Unknown | Caucasian | 99.8% |
| 2010 | NH | 2190 | 3.80 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 98.9% |
| 2010 | MA | 2190 | 3.10 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 89.5% |
| 2010 | (Private) | 2170 | 3.75 | Class Not Ranked | South Asian | 98.5% |
| 2010 | NJ | 2170 | 3.50 | Top 25% | Caucasian | 96.0% |
| 2010 | FL | 2150 | 3.84 | Top 4% | Caucasian | 99.8% |
| 2010 | CA | 2150 | 3.70 | Top 10% | None Indicated | 98.3% |
| 2010 | FL | 2150 | 3.71 | Top 5% | Hispanic | 99.1% |
| 2010 | MD | 2150 | 3.90 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 99.1% |
| 2010 | NY | 2140 | 3.15 | Bottom 50% | East Asian | 83.7% |
| 2010 | CA | 2130 | 3.60 | Top 10% | South Asian | 97.4% |
| 2010 | NJ | 2120 | 3.90 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 98.9% |
| 2010 | NY | 2110 | 3.66 | Class Not Ranked | Hispanic | 92.2% |
| 2010 | PA | 2110 | 3.58 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 97.2% |
| 2010 | CA | 2110 | 3.81 | Top 25% | East Asian | 97.9% |
| 2010 | WA | 2110 | 3.40 | Class Not Ranked | None Indicated | 93.9% |
| 2010 | TX | 2110 | 4.00 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 99.0% |
| 2010 | RI | 2110 | 3.50 | Unknown | Caucasian | 95.5% |
| 2010 | NY | 2100 | 3.50 | Class Not Ranked | Middle-Eastern | 96.0% |
| 2010 | GA | 2100 | 3.60 | Top 25% | Caucasian | 95.7% |
| 2010 | CT | 2100 | 3.60 | Unknown | None Indicated | 96.5% |
| 2010 | NJ | 2100 | 4.00 | Top 2% | African-American | 97.8% |
| 2010 | XX | 2100 | 4.00 | Top 1% | Hispanic | 97.8% |
| 2010 | FL | 2090 | 3.63 | Class Not Ranked | East Asian | 99.6% |
| 2010 | NJ | 2090 | 3.00 | Top 15% | Caucasian | 87.3% |
| 2010 | CO | 2090 | 4.00 | Valedictorian | Other | 99.6% |
| 2010 | FL | 2090 | 3.30 | Unknown | Caucasian | 98.1% |
| 2010 | RI | 2080 | 3.50 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 94.7% |
| 2010 | FL | 2070 | 3.80 | Top 2% | Caucasian | 99.7% |
| 2010 | FL | 2070 | 4.00 | Top 1% | Caucasian | 99.8% |
| 2010 | TX | 2060 | 4.00 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 98.9% |
| 2010 | CT | 2060 | 3.00 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 76.6% |
| 2010 | LA | 2060 | 3.75 | Top 30% | Caucasian | 96.2% |
| 2010 | (Private) | 2050 | 3.50 | Top 15% | Caucasian | 97.1% |
| 2010 | FL | 2050 | 3.68 | Top 10% | African-American | 98.0% |
| 2010 | NY | 2050 | 3.80 | Class Not Ranked | Hispanic | 92.9% |
| 2010 | NJ | 2050 | 3.37 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 90.8% |
| 2010 | NJ | 2050 | 3.56 | Class Not Ranked | East Asian | 94.8% |
| 2010 | MA | 2050 | 2.90 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 68.9% |
| 2010 | NJ | 2050 | 3.34 | Top 20% | Middle-Eastern | 89.0% |
| 2010 | NY | 2050 | 3.20 | Top 30% | East Asian | 80.6% |
| 2010 | CA | 2040 | 3.92 | Unknown | South Asian | 98.9% |
| 2010 | CA | 2040 | 3.25 | Top 2% | Hispanic | 74.2% |
| 2010 | NJ | 2040 | 3.70 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 96.4% |
| 2010 | FL | 2040 | 3.51 | Top 15% | Caucasian | 98.7% |
| 2010 | NJ | 2040 | 3.50 | Unknown | Caucasian | 93.4% |
| 2010 | NJ | 2040 | 3.79 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 97.6% |
| 2010 | FL | 2030 | 3.89 | Top 1% | Hispanic | 99.5% |
| 2010 | MD | 2030 | 3.92 | Unknown | Caucasian | 98.9% |
| 2010 | FL | 2030 | 3.40 | Unknown | Caucasian | 98.4% |
| 2010 | NY | 2030 | 3.50 | Class Not Ranked | African-American | 82.0% |
| 2010 | NC | 2030 | 3.98 | Valedictorian | Caucasian | 98.9% |
| 2010 | NJ | 2020 | 3.30 | Unknown | Other | 87.0% |
| 2010 | NJ | 2020 | 3.58 | Top 40% | Caucasian | 90.4% |
| 2010 | FL | 2020 | 3.60 | Top 1% | Hispanic | 97.6% |
| 2010 | NJ | 2020 | 3.40 | Class Not Ranked | South Asian | 90.2% |
| 2010 | NY | 2010 | 3.70 | Class Not Ranked | African-American | 95.6% |
| 2010 | FL | 2010 | 3.65 | Top 10% | South Asian | 99.4% |
| 2010 | NJ | 2010 | 3.54 | Top 4% | Caucasian | 94.5% |
| 2010 | NJ | 2010 | 2.80 | Class Not Ranked | None Indicated | 56.3% |
| 2010 | KS | 1990 | 3.00 | Unknown | Caucasian | 77.5% |
| 2010 | FL | 1990 | 3.93 | Top 2% | Caucasian | 99.7% |
| 2010 | NJ | 1990 | 3.30 | Class Not Ranked | South Asian | 84.9% |
| 2010 | XX | 1990 | 3.80 | Class Not Ranked | Hispanic | 90.3% |
| 2010 | CA | 1990 | 3.55 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 92.6% |
| 2010 | CA | 1980 | 3.70 | Class Not Ranked | Middle-Eastern | 97.8% |
| 2010 | CA | 1980 | 3.53 | Class Not Ranked | Hispanic | 78.8% |
| 2010 | FL | 1980 | 3.32 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 96.2% |
| 2010 | FL | 1970 | 3.45 | Top 3% | Caucasian | 98.2% |
| 2010 | FL | 1970 | 3.79 | Top 2% | Caucasian | 99.4% |
| 2010 | CA | 1960 | 4.00 | Valedictorian | East Asian | 99.4% |
| 2010 | PA | 1960 | 3.75 | Top 15% | Caucasian | 95.2% |
| 2010 | FL | 1960 | 3.41 | Unknown | Caucasian | 97.1% |
| 2010 | NJ | 1960 | 4.00 | Top 10% | None Indicated | 98.0% |
| 2010 | FL | 1960 | 3.69 | Top 25% | Hispanic | 95.7% |
| 2010 | NY | 1960 | 3.72 | Top 15% | Caucasian | 94.7% |
| 2010 | NJ | 1960 | 3.70 | Top 10% | South Asian | 95.0% |
| 2010 | FL | 1950 | 3.00 | Top 40% | Caucasian | 98.5% |
| 2010 | CA | 1950 | 2.80 | Class Not Ranked | African-American | 30.2% |
| 2010 | MA | 1950 | 3.39 | Top 40% | Caucasian | 77.5% |
| 2010 | AL | 1950 | 3.52 | Class Not Ranked | South Asian | 90.0% |
| 2010 | NJ | 1950 | 3.33 | Top 25% | Caucasian | 79.8% |
| 2010 | GA | 1950 | 3.71 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 94.9% |
| 2010 | NJ | 1940 | 2.30 | Class Not Ranked | South Asian | 15.0% |
| 2010 | XX | 1940 | 3.60 | Top 10% | East Asian | 92.5% |
| 2010 | NY | 1940 | 3.70 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 93.2% |
| 2010 | XX | 1940 | 3.30 | Top 10% | Hispanic | 61.5% |
| 2010 | CA | 1940 | 3.50 | Top 40% | Caucasian | 82.3% |
| 2010 | DE | 1930 | 4.00 | Top 25% | Caucasian | 98.5% |
| 2010 | NY | 1930 | 3.70 | Class Not Ranked | African-American | 88.4% |
| 2010 | CA | 1930 | 3.85 | Top 4% | Caucasian | 96.7% |
| 2010 | NJ | 1930 | 3.80 | Top 15% | Caucasian | 95.1% |
| 2010 | FL | 1920 | 3.10 | Class Not Ranked | South Asian | 92.3% |
| 2010 | FL | 1910 | 3.62 | Top 3% | Hispanic | 96.5% |
| 2010 | CT | 1910 | 3.85 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 95.9% |
| 2010 | FL | 1910 | 3.50 | Top 5% | South Asian | 97.7% |
| 2010 | FL | 1910 | 3.58 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 98.0% |
| 2010 | IN | 1900 | 3.80 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 98.6% |
| 2010 | ME | 1900 | 4.00 | Top 2% | Caucasian | 99.4% |
| 2010 | FL | 1900 | 3.71 | Top 1% | East Asian | 98.8% |
| 2010 | NH | 1900 | 3.40 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 80.4% |
| 2010 | GA | 1900 | 4.00 | Top 2% | Caucasian | 97.6% |
| 2010 | GA | 1900 | 3.56 | Top 25% | Caucasian | 86.0% |
| 2010 | HI | 1900 | 3.77 | Top 10% | East Asian | 94.3% |
| 2010 | FL | 1890 | 3.71 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 98.7% |
| 2010 | CT | 1890 | 3.35 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 76.9% |
| 2010 | FL | 1890 | 3.80 | Top 10% | Hispanic | 96.7% |
| 2010 | FL | 1890 | 3.70 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 98.1% |
| 2010 | NY | 1880 | 3.60 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 88.7% |
| 2010 | TX | 1880 | 3.65 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 89.1% |
| 2010 | CA | 1880 | 3.90 | Top 4% | Hispanic | 89.7% |
| 2010 | MA | 1880 | 3.33 | Unknown | None Indicated | 76.8% |
| 2010 | FL | 1880 | 3.40 | Class Not Ranked | African-American | 100.0% |
| 2010 | XX | 1880 | 3.90 | Top 5% | Hispanic | 89.5% |
| 2010 | IL | 1870 | 3.45 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 86.6% |
| 2010 | OH | 1870 | 4.00 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 96.7% |
| 2010 | GA | 1860 | 3.10 | Top 25% | Caucasian | 99.9% |
| 2010 | MD | 1860 | 3.76 | Top 20% | South Asian | 91.2% |
| 2010 | PA | 1860 | 3.71 | Top 1% | Caucasian | 93.1% |
| 2010 | GA | 1850 | 3.60 | Top 40% | Hispanic | 56.0% |
| 2010 | CA | 1850 | 3.60 | Top 20% | Middle-Eastern | 85.5% |
| 2010 | FL | 1840 | 3.80 | Top 10% | South Asian | 99.6% |
| 2010 | TX | 1840 | 3.72 | Top 3% | Hispanic | 79.8% |
| 2010 | NC | 1840 | 3.40 | Class Not Ranked | Hispanic | 52.2% |
| 2010 | MA | 1840 | 4.00 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 96.1% |
| 2010 | PA | 1840 | 3.30 | Top 35% | East Asian | 60.3% |
| 2010 | NJ | 1840 | 3.33 | Top 25% | South Asian | 67.6% |
| 2010 | MA | 1830 | 3.08 | Unknown | Caucasian | 52.7% |
| 2010 | FL | 1830 | 3.39 | Bottom 50% | Caucasian | 100.0% |
| 2010 | FL | 1830 | 3.17 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 89.3% |
| 2010 | CA | 1830 | 3.30 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 69.1% |
| 2010 | NY | 1830 | 3.80 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 91.7% |
| 2010 | FL | 1820 | 2.90 | Bottom 40% | Hispanic | 44.0% |
| 2010 | FL | 1820 | 3.20 | Bottom 20% | Hispanic | 38.4% |
| 2010 | PA | 1820 | 2.99 | Top 20% | South Asian | 41.5% |
| 2010 | FL | 1820 | 3.52 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 96.0% |
| 2010 | GA | 1820 | 3.60 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 83.2% |
| 2010 | MD | 1820 | 3.40 | Top 40% | African-American | 36.2% |
| 2010 | OH | 1810 | 3.70 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 100.0% |
| 2010 | NJ | 1810 | 3.50 | Top 25% | Caucasian | 75.1% |
| 2010 | XX | 1810 | 3.00 | Bottom 50% | South Asian | 26.1% |
| 2010 | PA | 1810 | 4.00 | Top 30% | Caucasian | 93.0% |
| 2010 | PA | 1810 | 3.25 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 62.9% |
| 2010 | CA | 1800 | 3.50 | Top 25% | East Asian | 90.6% |
| 2010 | NJ | 1800 | 3.50 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 85.7% |
| 2010 | FL | 1800 | 3.70 | Top 10% | African-American | 92.7% |
| 2010 | NJ | 1800 | 3.05 | Class Not Ranked | African-American | 22.2% |
| 2010 | VA | 1790 | 3.60 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 82.3% |
| 2010 | MD | 1790 | 2.28 | Bottom 0% | Caucasian | 1.1% |
| 2010 | NJ | 1790 | 4.00 | Top 2% | Caucasian | 95.7% |
| 2010 | NJ | 1790 | 3.52 | Class Not Ranked | South Asian | 78.3% |
| 2010 | FL | 1790 | 3.69 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 97.2% |
| 2010 | CA | 1790 | 3.76 | Top 10% | African-American | 74.4% |
| 2010 | FL | 1780 | 3.76 | Top 15% | Caucasian | 97.4% |
| 2010 | FL | 1780 | 3.88 | Top 10% | Hispanic | 95.2% |
| 2010 | FL | 1780 | 3.17 | Top 40% | Caucasian | 76.2% |
| 2010 | GA | 1780 | 3.26 | Top 10% | African-American | 35.6% |
| 2010 | CA | 1770 | 3.60 | Top 20% | Hispanic | 55.4% |
| 2010 | CA | 1770 | 3.23 | Unknown | East Asian | 55.9% |
| 2010 | XX | 1770 | 3.60 | Top 40% | Hispanic | 44.4% |
| 2010 | FL | 1760 | 3.60 | Top 10% | Other | 95.6% |
| 2010 | FL | 1760 | 2.90 | Unknown | Caucasian | 67.9% |
| 2010 | CA | 1760 | 3.67 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 83.0% |
| 2010 | NE | 1750 | 3.20 | Bottom 50% | Caucasian | 51.6% |
| 2010 | FM | 1750 | 3.60 | Top 35% | Caucasian | 70.1% |
| 2010 | MA | 1740 | 3.40 | Top 15% | Caucasian | 75.5% |
| 2010 | OH | 1740 | 3.50 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 69.3% |
| 2010 | NJ | 1730 | 3.50 | Top 40% | Caucasian | 58.0% |
| 2010 | (Private) | 1730 | 3.50 | Top 25% | Caucasian | 65.7% |
| 2010 | FM | 1730 | 3.78 | Top 25% | Caucasian | 82.4% |
| 2010 | WA | 1730 | 3.80 | Unknown | Native American | 67.6% |
| 2010 | NJ | 1720 | 3.30 | Top 40% | Hispanic | 18.6% |
| 2010 | FL | 1720 | 3.00 | Top 10% | Hispanic | 46.1% |
| 2010 | NJ | 1720 | 3.80 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 87.9% |
| 2010 | CA | 1720 | 3.87 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 89.0% |
| 2010 | MA | 1710 | 3.60 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 76.5% |
| 2010 | FL | 1710 | 3.45 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 89.1% |
| 2010 | XX | 1700 | 3.00 | Top 30% | None Indicated | 22.7% |
| 2010 | NY | 1700 | 3.48 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 100.0% |
| 2010 | NJ | 1700 | 3.30 | Top 40% | South Asian | 38.0% |
| 2010 | XX | 1700 | 3.50 | Unknown | South Asian | 66.8% |
| 2010 | PA | 1700 | 3.30 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 51.6% |
| 2010 | FL | 1700 | 3.80 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 96.3% |
| 2010 | NY | 1690 | 3.34 | Unknown | Hispanic | 27.5% |
| 2010 | DE | 1690 | 3.70 | Top 10% | South Asian | 79.9% |
| 2010 | PA | 1690 | 3.15 | Top 35% | Caucasian | 28.4% |
| 2010 | NJ | 1690 | 3.40 | Top 35% | Caucasian | 46.8% |
| 2010 | FL | 1680 | 3.60 | Top 15% | Hispanic | 93.3% |
| 2010 | MD | 1680 | 3.40 | Top 30% | South Asian | 54.7% |
| 2010 | FL | 1680 | 3.50 | Top 15% | Caucasian | 90.0% |
| 2010 | FL | 1670 | 3.80 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 97.4% |
| 2010 | FL | 1670 | 3.83 | Top 5% | East Asian | 96.8% |
| 2010 | NY | 1660 | 3.40 | Top 30% | Caucasian | 45.2% |
| 2010 | NY | 1660 | 3.70 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 74.9% |
| 2010 | NC | 1650 | 3.90 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 86.7% |
| 2010 | CT | 1650 | 3.50 | Top 25% | Caucasian | 54.6% |
| 2010 | NJ | 1650 | 3.30 | Top 35% | Caucasian | 33.8% |
| 2010 | FL | 1650 | 3.40 | Top 10% | African-American | 67.3% |
| 2010 | (Private) | 1640 | 3.85 | Top 3% | Caucasian | 98.8% |
| 2010 | FL | 1640 | 3.81 | Top 4% | East Asian | 96.1% |
| 2010 | GA | 1640 | 3.80 | Top 3% | Middle-Eastern | 82.8% |
| 2010 | NV | 1630 | 3.30 | Top 30% | Caucasian | 33.5% |
| 2010 | TX | 1620 | 3.77 | Top 15% | Hispanic | 50.0% |
| 2010 | FL | 1610 | 3.50 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 90.2% |
| 2010 | FL | 1610 | 3.86 | Valedictorian | African-American | 92.4% |
| 2010 | GA | 1610 | 3.20 | Top 40% | Caucasian | 21.0% |
| 2010 | FL | 1600 | 3.20 | Top 20% | Hispanic | 39.4% |
| 2010 | FL | 1590 | 3.00 | Unknown | Hispanic | 26.7% |
| 2010 | VA | 1590 | 3.20 | Top 35% | African-American | 8.1% |
| 2010 | NJ | 1590 | 4.00 | Top 1% | Hispanic | 70.5% |
| 2010 | FL | 1580 | 3.60 | Top 20% | South Asian | 93.5% |
| 2010 | TX | 1580 | 3.50 | Top 10% | Hispanic | 30.3% |
| 2010 | FL | 1580 | 3.08 | Top 10% | Hispanic | 33.3% |
| 2010 | GA | 1550 | 3.89 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 92.7% |
| 2010 | NJ | 1530 | 3.40 | Unknown | Hispanic | 15.5% |
| 2010 | XX | 1530 | 2.50 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 3.0% |
| 2010 | MN | 1520 | 3.60 | Top 25% | Caucasian | 44.0% |
| 2010 | NY | 1520 | 3.93 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 77.7% |
| 2010 | XX | 1510 | 3.90 | Top 3% | African-American | 51.0% |
| 2010 | VA | 1510 | 3.56 | Bottom 50% | Caucasian | 27.1% |
| 2010 | NY | 1500 | 2.90 | Bottom 50% | Caucasian | 5.3% |
| 2010 | TX | 1500 | 2.90 | Bottom 10% | African-American | 0.6% |
| 2010 | PA | 1500 | 2.70 | Bottom 40% | Caucasian | 1.8% |
| 2010 | CA | 1500 | 3.00 | Unknown | Hispanic | 4.1% |
| 2010 | FL | 1480 | 3.00 | Top 40% | Caucasian | 24.8% |
| 2010 | MA | 1460 | 2.90 | Bottom 50% | African-American | 1.3% |
| 2010 | CA | 1450 | 3.13 | Top 30% | East Asian | 26.6% |
| 2010 | FL | 1420 | 3.19 | Unknown | Hispanic | 20.5% |
| 2010 | FL | 1360 | 3.50 | Unknown | None Indicated | 58.4% |
| 2010 | CA | 1320 | 3.77 | Top 10% | African-American | 16.5% |
| 2010 | FL | 1300 | 3.10 | Bottom 50% | Caucasian | 84.6% |
| 2010 | FL | 1260 | 2.90 | Unknown | Caucasian | 10.5% |
| 2010 | RI | 1250 | 2.90 | Bottom 50% | Caucasian | 1.0% |
| 2010 | NJ | 1220 | 3.13 | Class Not Ranked | Hispanic | 30.5% |
| 2010 | (Private) | 760 | 3.30 | Unknown | Caucasian | 96.5% |
| 2010 | FL | 720 | 3.50 | Top 5% | South Asian | 99.3% |
| 2010 | MD | 34 | 3.50 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 98.1% |
| 2010 | CO | 34 | 3.91 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 99.6% |
| 2010 | CA | 33 | 3.58 | Class Not Ranked | South Asian | 97.8% |
| 2010 | CA | 33 | 3.70 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 98.3% |
| 2010 | IL | 32 | 3.85 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 98.8% |
| 2010 | NJ | 32 | 3.71 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 98.1% |
| 2010 | MD | 32 | 3.80 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 98.4% |
| 2010 | IL | 32 | 2.89 | Top 20% | Other | 75.4% |
| 2010 | NY | 31 | 3.80 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 97.8% |
| 2010 | IL | 31 | 3.53 | Top 25% | Hispanic | 83.4% |
| 2010 | VA | 31 | 3.70 | Class Not Ranked | East Asian | 97.0% |
| 2010 | OH | 31 | 3.83 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 98.0% |
| 2010 | IL | 31 | 3.88 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 98.1% |
| 2010 | IL | 31 | 3.30 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 88.9% |
| 2010 | CO | 30 | 4.00 | Salutatorian | Caucasian | 98.8% |
| 2010 | FL | 30 | 3.90 | Class Not Ranked | Middle-Eastern | 99.5% |
| 2010 | FL | 30 | 3.75 | Top 20% | Hispanic | 97.6% |
| 2010 | NJ | 30 | 3.71 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 95.9% |
| 2010 | LA | 30 | 3.89 | Unknown | Hispanic | 93.3% |
| 2010 | GA | 30 | 3.50 | Unknown | African-American | 80.1% |
| 2010 | CO | 29 | 3.77 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 95.7% |
| 2010 | FL | 29 | 3.70 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 99.0% |
| 2010 | OH | 29 | 4.00 | Top 15% | Caucasian | 97.7% |
| 2010 | UT | 29 | 3.80 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 96.1% |
| 2010 | OH | 29 | 3.60 | Unknown | Caucasian | 92.1% |
| 2010 | NJ | 29 | 3.95 | Unknown | Caucasian | 97.3% |
| 2010 | LA | 29 | 3.60 | Top 25% | Caucasian | 90.3% |
| 2010 | CA | 28 | 3.39 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 80.8% |
| 2010 | MA | 28 | 3.10 | Unknown | Caucasian | 62.6% |
| 2010 | IL | 28 | 2.97 | Bottom 50% | Caucasian | 33.9% |
| 2010 | NE | 28 | 3.61 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 90.5% |
| 2010 | MI | 28 | 3.96 | Top 3% | Caucasian | 97.1% |
| 2010 | IL | 28 | 2.50 | Top 30% | Caucasian | 15.1% |
| 2010 | FL | 27 | 3.73 | Top 1% | South Asian | 98.4% |
| 2010 | MO | 27 | 3.85 | Top 15% | Caucasian | 92.8% |
| 2010 | MI | 27 | 3.50 | Top 25% | Caucasian | 77.3% |
| 2010 | TX | 26 | 3.50 | Bottom 50% | Hispanic | 33.7% |
| 2010 | FL | 26 | 3.88 | Top 15% | Hispanic | 94.9% |
| 2010 | WI | 26 | 3.75 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 89.0% |
| 2010 | WI | 25 | 4.00 | Top 20% | African-American | 77.4% |
| 2010 | NY | 24 | 3.80 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 82.6% |
| 2010 | NY | 24 | 3.40 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 54.3% |
| 2010 | NJ | 24 | 3.50 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 59.4% |
| 2010 | IL | 24 | 3.40 | Top 40% | Caucasian | 40.7% |
| 2010 | IL | 23 | 2.70 | Unknown | Hispanic | 3.0% |
| 2010 | IA | 23 | 3.35 | Top 25% | Caucasian | 36.5% |
| 2010 | LA | 23 | 4.00 | Top 1% | African-American | 72.2% |
| 2010 | OH | 23 | 3.10 | Top 30% | Caucasian | 18.9% |
| 2010 | TX | 23 | 3.10 | Bottom 50% | Caucasian | 13.0% |
| 2010 | NJ | 23 | 3.75 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 74.1% |
| 2010 | FL | 22 | 3.70 | Top 25% | Hispanic | 67.7% |
| 2010 | WA | 21 | 3.60 | Unknown | African-American | 21.1% |
| 2010 | TN | 21 | 3.20 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 16.6% |
| 2010 | NJ | 21 | 3.00 | Unknown | Hispanic | 98.4% |
| 2010 | OH | 21 | 3.40 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 32.0% |
| 2010 | IL | 19 | 3.01 | Bottom 50% | Other | 2.7% |
| 2010 | WV | 16 | 3.10 | Bottom 50% | Caucasian | 1.3% |
| 2009 | MA | 2360 | 3.30 | Unknown | Middle-Eastern | 98.0% |
| 2009 | MA | 2340 | 2.70 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 86.3% |
| 2009 | MA | 2340 | 2.90 | Unknown | Caucasian | 92.2% |
| 2009 | MA | 2340 | 3.40 | Unknown | Middle-Eastern | 98.3% |
| 2009 | NY | 2310 | 4.00 | Unknown | Caucasian | 99.7% |
| 2009 | VT | 2270 | 3.82 | Top 5% | Middle-Eastern | 99.5% |
| 2009 | NJ | 2270 | 3.87 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 99.5% |
| 2009 | FL | 2270 | 3.81 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 99.9% |
| 2009 | NV | 2260 | 3.80 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 99.4% |
| 2009 | IL | 2250 | 3.87 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 99.4% |
| 2009 | FL | 2250 | 3.89 | Top 1% | Caucasian | 99.9% |
| 2009 | (Private) | 2220 | 3.60 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 100.0% |
| 2009 | CA | 2210 | 3.88 | Unknown | Caucasian | 99.2% |
| 2009 | CO | 2190 | 3.75 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 100.0% |
| 2009 | OH | 2180 | 3.30 | Top 30% | Caucasian | 92.8% |
| 2009 | FL | 2180 | 4.00 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 99.9% |
| 2009 | CA | 2180 | 3.64 | Unknown | Caucasian | 98.0% |
| 2009 | FL | 2150 | 3.60 | Top 5% | Hispanic | 98.7% |
| 2009 | NJ | 2140 | 3.80 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 98.7% |
| 2009 | FL | 2130 | 3.23 | Top 10% | East Asian | 98.3% |
| 2009 | NY | 2120 | 3.77 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 98.2% |
| 2009 | MD | 2120 | 3.40 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 93.7% |
| 2009 | (Private) | 2110 | 3.60 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 97.0% |
| 2009 | NY | 2100 | 3.90 | Top 1% | Hispanic | 97.1% |
| 2009 | NY | 2100 | 3.80 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 98.3% |
| 2009 | FL | 2100 | 3.90 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 99.8% |
| 2009 | CT | 2090 | 3.94 | Top 5% | Hispanic | 97.6% |
| 2009 | NJ | 2080 | 3.20 | Top 30% | Caucasian | 83.1% |
| 2009 | FL | 2080 | 3.50 | Top 5% | East Asian | 99.1% |
| 2009 | FL | 2080 | 3.20 | Top 20% | Other | 96.9% |
| 2009 | NJ | 2070 | 3.60 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 96.3% |
| 2009 | XX | 2060 | 3.90 | Unknown | Caucasian | 98.3% |
| 2009 | PA | 2060 | 3.90 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 98.5% |
| 2009 | NY | 2060 | 4.00 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 98.9% |
| 2009 | FL | 2050 | 3.48 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 98.4% |
| 2009 | FL | 2050 | 3.90 | Top 10% | East Asian | 99.7% |
| 2009 | FL | 2050 | 3.85 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 99.6% |
| 2009 | FL | 2050 | 3.25 | Top 30% | Caucasian | 96.1% |
| 2009 | CA | 2050 | 3.45 | Unknown | Caucasian | 92.7% |
| 2009 | FL | 2040 | 3.10 | Unknown | Caucasian | 95.2% |
| 2009 | FL | 2040 | 3.40 | Unknown | Hispanic | 94.6% |
| 2009 | FL | 2030 | 3.92 | Top 5% | Hispanic | 99.3% |
| 2009 | FL | 2030 | 3.50 | Top 10% | South Asian | 98.7% |
| 2009 | FL | 2030 | 3.88 | Top 1% | South Asian | 99.7% |
| 2009 | MA | 2030 | 3.38 | Top 30% | Caucasian | 86.9% |
| 2009 | (Private) | 2030 | 3.50 | Unknown | Caucasian | 93.1% |
| 2009 | FL | 2030 | 3.67 | Top 5% | Hispanic | 98.0% |
| 2009 | FL | 2030 | 3.91 | Top 5% | Hispanic | 99.1% |
| 2009 | XX | 2020 | 3.70 | Unknown | East Asian | 96.0% |
| 2009 | NH | 2020 | 3.80 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 97.3% |
| 2009 | NY | 2010 | 3.52 | Top 20% | Middle-Eastern | 92.0% |
| 2009 | VA | 2000 | 3.00 | Unknown | East Asian | 69.8% |
| 2009 | MD | 2000 | 4.00 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 98.6% |
| 2009 | CA | 2000 | 3.75 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 96.2% |
| 2009 | CA | 2000 | 3.25 | Top 10% | East Asian | 85.1% |
| 2009 | FL | 1990 | 4.00 | Top 1% | Hispanic | 100.0% |
| 2009 | FL | 1980 | 3.20 | Top 30% | Caucasian | 95.9% |
| 2009 | (Private) | 1980 | 3.90 | Top 1% | African-American | 99.0% |
| 2009 | FL | 1970 | 3.86 | Top 1% | Caucasian | 99.9% |
| 2009 | FL | 1970 | 3.67 | Top 10% | South Asian | 99.1% |
| 2009 | TX | 1970 | 3.90 | Top 5% | South Asian | 97.7% |
| 2009 | TX | 1970 | 4.00 | Top 20% | South Asian | 97.7% |
| 2009 | FL | 1960 | 3.80 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 100.0% |
| 2009 | MA | 1960 | 3.00 | Bottom 50% | Caucasian | 45.6% |
| 2009 | TX | 1950 | 3.65 | Unknown | None Indicated | 93.2% |
| 2009 | NY | 1950 | 3.61 | Top 1% | Caucasian | 94.2% |
| 2009 | DE | 1950 | 3.50 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 88.4% |
| 2009 | NY | 1950 | 3.40 | Unknown | African-American | 67.4% |
| 2009 | GA | 1940 | 3.50 | Top 30% | South Asian | 96.1% |
| 2009 | NY | 1930 | 2.90 | Unknown | Caucasian | 52.6% |
| 2009 | CT | 1930 | 3.35 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 80.7% |
| 2009 | PA | 1930 | 3.20 | Top 40% | Caucasian | 62.5% |
| 2009 | FL | 1930 | 3.50 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 97.4% |
| 2009 | FL | 1930 | 2.90 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 84.8% |
| 2009 | WA | 1930 | 4.00 | Top 1% | Caucasian | 98.0% |
| 2009 | FL | 1920 | 3.48 | Top 20% | Hispanic | 91.0% |
| 2009 | FL | 1920 | 3.10 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 90.0% |
| 2009 | (Private) | 1920 | 3.70 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 93.8% |
| 2009 | NJ | 1900 | 3.40 | Class Not Ranked | African-American | 60.7% |
| 2009 | CA | 1900 | 3.50 | Unknown | Caucasian | 86.3% |
| 2009 | (Private) | 1900 | 3.00 | Unknown | Caucasian | 56.2% |
| 2009 | NY | 1900 | 3.50 | Top 20% | Hispanic | 100.0% |
| 2009 | FL | 1890 | 3.81 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 99.5% |
| 2009 | FL | 1890 | 4.00 | Top 5% | Hispanic | 100.0% |
| 2009 | CA | 1880 | 2.98 | Top 10% | East Asian | 64.4% |
| 2009 | NY | 1880 | 3.33 | Unknown | Caucasian | 76.8% |
| 2009 | FL | 1880 | 3.64 | Top 20% | Hispanic | 100.0% |
| 2009 | PA | 1870 | 4.00 | Salutatorian | East Asian | 97.3% |
| 2009 | CA | 1870 | 3.70 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 90.0% |
| 2009 | FL | 1860 | 3.80 | Top 20% | Middle-Eastern | 99.5% |
| 2009 | OH | 1840 | 3.81 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 97.6% |
| 2009 | NJ | 1840 | 3.65 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 86.6% |
| 2009 | MD | 1840 | 3.50 | Top 20% | African-American | 57.3% |
| 2009 | CA | 1830 | 3.45 | Unknown | Caucasian | 78.3% |
| 2009 | FL | 1820 | 3.90 | Top 1% | Hispanic | 97.1% |
| 2009 | ME | 1820 | 3.30 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 68.0% |
| 2009 | CO | 1810 | 3.60 | Top 30% | Hispanic | 88.8% |
| 2009 | XX | 1810 | 3.60 | Top 20% | Hispanic | 60.8% |
| 2009 | NY | 1800 | 3.10 | Top 30% | Caucasian | 41.7% |
| 2009 | FL | 1800 | 3.20 | Unknown | Caucasian | 87.3% |
| 2009 | CA | 1790 | 3.42 | Unknown | Caucasian | 72.4% |
| 2009 | MA | 1780 | 3.40 | Top 30% | Caucasian | 62.3% |
| 2009 | MA | 1780 | 3.30 | Top 30% | Caucasian | 54.5% |
| 2009 | MA | 1780 | 3.50 | Top 40% | Caucasian | 64.5% |
| 2009 | MA | 1780 | 3.50 | Top 40% | Caucasian | 64.5% |
| 2009 | FL | 1780 | 3.69 | Top 5% | Hispanic | 92.4% |
| 2009 | VA | 1780 | 3.75 | Top 20% | Middle-Eastern | 86.2% |
| 2009 | FL | 1770 | 3.40 | Top 20% | Hispanic | 76.7% |
| 2009 | NJ | 1760 | 2.08 | Unknown | Caucasian | 3.0% |
| 2009 | FL | 1750 | 3.50 | Top 30% | Hispanic | 76.3% |
| 2009 | CA | 1740 | 2.96 | Class Not Ranked | East Asian | 31.1% |
| 2009 | FL | 1730 | 3.49 | Top 5% | African-American | 83.0% |
| 2009 | RI | 1730 | 2.30 | Bottom 20% | Caucasian | 1.2% |
| 2009 | NJ | 1730 | 3.00 | Class Not Ranked | African-American | 14.1% |
| 2009 | XX | 1720 | 3.70 | Top 5% | Other | 84.0% |
| 2009 | MD | 1720 | 3.83 | Top 10% | African-American | 70.6% |
| 2009 | FL | 1720 | 3.24 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 84.6% |
| 2009 | FL | 1710 | 3.60 | Top 10% | East Asian | 94.2% |
| 2009 | NY | 1710 | 3.50 | Unknown | Caucasian | 67.9% |
| 2009 | FL | 1700 | 3.30 | Top 10% | Hispanic | 80.9% |
| 2009 | NY | 1700 | 4.00 | Unknown | Caucasian | 90.8% |
| 2009 | FL | 1700 | 2.12 | Bottom 40% | Caucasian | 4.4% |
| 2009 | (Private) | 1700 | 3.20 | Top 10% | South Asian | 81.3% |
| 2009 | OH | 1690 | 3.42 | Top 30% | Caucasian | 56.3% |
| 2009 | MD | 1690 | 2.90 | Bottom 20% | Caucasian | 6.2% |
| 2009 | NV | 1680 | 3.93 | Top 1% | African-American | 93.8% |
| 2009 | FL | 1680 | 3.78 | Salutatorian | African-American | 91.1% |
| 2009 | FL | 1670 | 3.20 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 78.5% |
| 2009 | MA | 1650 | 2.64 | Unknown | Caucasian | 8.8% |
| 2009 | FL | 1640 | 3.50 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 86.5% |
| 2009 | CT | 1620 | 3.79 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 76.1% |
| 2009 | FL | 1620 | 4.00 | Top 1% | Caucasian | 97.7% |
| 2009 | NH | 1610 | 3.80 | Unknown | Caucasian | 75.7% |
| 2009 | FL | 1590 | 3.20 | Top 30% | Hispanic | 51.9% |
| 2009 | MA | 1590 | 3.36 | Top 30% | Caucasian | 34.7% |
| 2009 | FL | 1590 | 3.50 | Class Not Ranked | Hispanic | 64.2% |
| 2009 | PA | 1580 | 3.40 | Top 30% | South Asian | 34.5% |
| 2009 | FL | 1580 | 4.00 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 100.0% |
| 2009 | RI | 1580 | 2.00 | Bottom 0% | Caucasian | 0.1% |
| 2009 | NJ | 1580 | 3.46 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 47.0% |
| 2009 | FL | 1570 | 3.30 | Top 30% | Caucasian | 81.5% |
| 2009 | FL | 1560 | 3.05 | Top 20% | African-American | 29.4% |
| 2009 | GA | 1540 | 3.64 | Top 10% | African-American | 32.4% |
| 2009 | CA | 1530 | 3.44 | Top 30% | Hispanic | 13.0% |
| 2009 | TX | 1520 | 3.58 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 47.9% |
| 2009 | NJ | 1520 | 2.70 | Class Not Ranked | Middle-Eastern | 5.3% |
| 2009 | SC | 1510 | 3.70 | Top 10% | African-American | 75.0% |
| 2009 | NY | 1500 | 3.50 | Bottom 40% | South Asian | 19.0% |
| 2009 | NJ | 1490 | 3.23 | Class Not Ranked | South Asian | 20.2% |
| 2009 | OH | 1480 | 1.80 | Top 30% | African-American | 0.2% |
| 2009 | FL | 1470 | 3.10 | Top 30% | African-American | 21.7% |
| 2009 | GA | 1460 | 4.00 | Unknown | Caucasian | 71.2% |
| 2009 | NY | 1390 | 3.80 | Top 10% | Hispanic | 24.5% |
| 2009 | FL | 1380 | 3.30 | Top 20% | Hispanic | 20.2% |
| 2009 | NY | 1340 | 2.80 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 2.6% |
| 2009 | FL | 1310 | 4.00 | Top 1% | None Indicated | 99.7% |
| 2009 | CA | 1310 | 2.86 | Top 30% | African-American | 0.7% |
| 2009 | XX | 1300 | 3.70 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 25.1% |
| 2009 | FL | 1250 | 3.60 | Unknown | Caucasian | 97.4% |
| 2009 | CA | 1210 | 3.10 | Top 30% | Caucasian | 54.6% |
| 2009 | FL | 1180 | 1.90 | Unknown | African-American | 0.1% |
| 2009 | TX | 1090 | 4.00 | Top 10% | Hispanic | 81.0% |
| 2009 | MO | 36 | 4.00 | Valedictorian | Caucasian | 99.9% |
| 2009 | MO | 34 | 3.30 | Top 30% | Other | 95.2% |
| 2009 | CA | 33 | 3.50 | Top 20% | Hispanic | 91.1% |
| 2009 | NY | 33 | 3.90 | Unknown | Caucasian | 99.2% |
| 2009 | NY | 33 | 3.75 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 98.7% |
| 2009 | FL | 33 | 3.41 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 99.2% |
| 2009 | FL | 33 | 4.00 | Top 10% | Middle-Eastern | 99.9% |
| 2009 | FL | 32 | 3.45 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 98.9% |
| 2009 | CA | 32 | 3.80 | Top 1% | Hispanic | 96.6% |
| 2009 | MA | 32 | 3.75 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 98.2% |
| 2009 | VA | 31 | 3.50 | Unknown | Caucasian | 94.4% |
| 2009 | FL | 31 | 3.50 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 98.8% |
| 2009 | IL | 31 | 3.58 | Unknown | Caucasian | 95.6% |
| 2009 | IL | 31 | 3.32 | Top 40% | Caucasian | 84.6% |
| 2009 | IN | 30 | 3.30 | Class Not Ranked | Hispanic | 68.0% |
| 2009 | NJ | 30 | 3.70 | Top 30% | Caucasian | 94.2% |
| 2009 | NV | 30 | 3.15 | Top 20% | African-American | 54.2% |
| 2009 | NJ | 30 | 3.27 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 85.2% |
| 2009 | FL | 30 | 3.20 | Top 30% | Caucasian | 94.3% |
| 2009 | FL | 30 | 3.50 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 98.4% |
| 2009 | FL | 30 | 3.33 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 97.2% |
| 2009 | MI | 30 | 3.50 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 91.5% |
| 2009 | MD | 30 | 2.80 | Unknown | Caucasian | 56.3% |
| 2009 | AZ | 29 | 3.50 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 90.4% |
| 2009 | GA | 29 | 3.45 | Class Not Ranked | African-American | 70.8% |
| 2009 | IL | 29 | 2.50 | Unknown | Caucasian | 26.0% |
| 2009 | IA | 29 | 3.60 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 91.3% |
| 2009 | GA | 28 | 3.96 | Top 10% | African-American | 90.7% |
| 2009 | MD | 28 | 3.81 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 93.5% |
| 2009 | OH | 28 | 3.92 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 95.3% |
| 2009 | NY | 28 | 3.40 | Unknown | Caucasian | 81.3% |
| 2009 | PA | 28 | 3.25 | Top 40% | Other | 60.9% |
| 2009 | FL | 28 | 3.95 | Top 5% | Hispanic | 98.1% |
| 2009 | FL | 28 | 3.95 | Top 1% | Hispanic | 98.3% |
| 2009 | WI | 28 | 3.30 | Unknown | Hispanic | 51.6% |
| 2009 | NJ | 27 | 3.00 | Top 40% | Caucasian | 99.9% |
| 2009 | CO | 27 | 3.70 | Class Not Ranked | Other | 88.9% |
| 2009 | AL | 27 | 3.66 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 87.6% |
| 2009 | IL | 27 | 3.62 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 84.8% |
| 2009 | FL | 27 | 3.30 | Top 20% | Hispanic | 77.2% |
| 2009 | TN | 27 | 3.20 | Unknown | Caucasian | 62.0% |
| 2009 | MO | 26 | 3.50 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 74.5% |
| 2009 | MO | 26 | 3.50 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 74.5% |
| 2009 | FL | 24 | 3.30 | Unknown | Caucasian | 81.3% |
| 2009 | MI | 24 | 3.25 | Bottom 50% | Caucasian | 25.4% |
| 2009 | FL | 24 | 3.80 | Unknown | Caucasian | 95.5% |
| 2009 | CT | 20 | 3.20 | Bottom 50% | Caucasian | 6.8% |
| 2009 | WA | 20 | 3.18 | Top 20% | African-American | 4.3% |
| 2008 | CA | 2340 | 3.70 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 99.4% |
| 2008 | DE | 2270 | 3.80 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 99.6% |
| 2008 | FL | 2260 | 3.85 | Top 10% | Hispanic | 99.7% |
| 2008 | NJ | 2250 | 3.70 | Unknown | African-American | 96.8% |
| 2008 | FL | 2200 | 3.20 | Top 40% | None Indicated | 97.5% |
| 2008 | AZ | 2190 | 3.86 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 99.2% |
| 2008 | CT | 2160 | 3.70 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 98.9% |
| 2008 | GA | 2130 | 3.60 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 96.7% |
| 2008 | FL | 2100 | 4.00 | Valedictorian | Hispanic | 99.7% |
| 2008 | FL | 2100 | 3.75 | Top 10% | Indian | 99.6% |
| 2008 | FL | 2090 | 3.33 | Unknown | None Indicated | 98.2% |
| 2008 | MA | 2050 | 3.20 | Bottom 50% | Caucasian | 72.7% |
| 2008 | CO | 2040 | 3.80 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 97.4% |
| 2008 | CA | 2040 | 3.80 | Unknown | South Asian | 97.4% |
| 2008 | CA | 2030 | 3.89 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 98.1% |
| 2008 | MA | 2010 | 3.50 | Unknown | Caucasian | 92.3% |
| 2008 | HI | 2000 | 3.80 | Top 20% | East Asian | 97.5% |
| 2008 | MD | 2000 | 3.54 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 93.5% |
| 2008 | MD | 1960 | 3.50 | Unknown | Caucasian | 89.9% |
| 2008 | XX | 1960 | 3.60 | Unknown | East Asian | 92.5% |
| 2008 | FL | 1920 | 3.35 | Class Not Ranked | East Asian | 95.7% |
| 2008 | FL | 1920 | 3.98 | Unknown | Hispanic | 98.2% |
| 2008 | MA | 1910 | 3.14 | Top 40% | None Indicated | 55.3% |
| 2008 | PA | 1910 | 3.54 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 87.3% |
| 2008 | CA | 1900 | 3.55 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 89.2% |
| 2008 | FL | 1900 | 3.60 | Top 5% | Hispanic | 94.8% |
| 2008 | FL | 1890 | 3.90 | Top 5% | South Asian | 99.5% |
| 2008 | CA | 1890 | 3.80 | Top 20% | African-American | 82.4% |
| 2008 | CA | 1880 | 3.80 | Top 20% | Hispanic | 81.7% |
| 2008 | FL | 1870 | 3.90 | Valedictorian | East Asian | 99.5% |
| 2008 | NJ | 1870 | 3.68 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 90.4% |
| 2008 | NY | 1870 | 2.76 | Unknown | Caucasian | 33.5% |
| 2008 | XX | 1860 | 3.69 | Top 20% | Middle-Eastern | 89.2% |
| 2008 | CT | 1840 | 3.20 | Unknown | None Indicated | 63.2% |
| 2008 | CO | 1800 | 3.60 | Unknown | African-American | 73.5% |
| 2008 | FL | 1770 | 3.65 | Top 10% | Hispanic | 92.8% |
| 2008 | VA | 1740 | 3.45 | Unknown | Middle-Eastern | 68.2% |
| 2008 | MA | 1690 | 3.20 | Top 20% | African-American | 27.5% |
| 2008 | FL | 1690 | 3.50 | Unknown | Hispanic | 76.0% |
| 2008 | CA | 1670 | 3.56 | Top 5% | Hispanic | 46.2% |
| 2008 | CA | 1670 | 3.00 | Unknown | None Indicated | 25.6% |
| 2008 | MI | 1630 | 3.69 | Top 10% | African-American | 47.7% |
| 2008 | FL | 1610 | 3.11 | Top 20% | African-American | 34.3% |
| 2008 | NY | 1600 | 2.30 | Unknown | Caucasian | 2.5% |
| 2008 | PA | 1580 | 3.50 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 47.4% |
| 2008 | FL | 1570 | 4.00 | Unknown | Caucasian | 95.9% |
| 2008 | FL | 1550 | 3.70 | Top 30% | Caucasian | 91.8% |
| 2008 | VA | 1550 | 3.56 | Top 5% | African-American | 30.0% |
| 2008 | XX | 1540 | 3.97 | Top 10% | East Asian | 79.8% |
| 2008 | VA | 1520 | 3.00 | Unknown | Caucasian | 14.3% |
| 2008 | NJ | 1480 | 3.20 | Bottom 50% | African-American | 3.2% |
| 2008 | FL | 1460 | 3.19 | Unknown | African-American | 24.1% |
| 2008 | FL | 1450 | 3.50 | Unknown | Hispanic | 44.3% |
| 2008 | CT | 1410 | 2.00 | Class Not Ranked | Hispanic | 0.1% |
| 2008 | NY | 1170 | 4.00 | Top 5% | Hispanic | 85.0% |
| 2008 | FL | 33 | 3.80 | Top 5% | Hispanic | 99.5% |
| 2008 | IL | 33 | 3.40 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 95.7% |
| 2008 | NY | 32 | 3.85 | Top 1% | Other | 99.0% |
| 2008 | TN | 30 | 3.00 | Unknown | East Asian | 70.9% |
| 2008 | KS | 28 | 3.97 | Top 1% | None Indicated | 97.3% |
| 2008 | MA | 28 | 3.65 | Top 10% | None Indicated | 91.5% |
| 2008 | (Private) | 27 | 3.15 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 58.2% |
| 2008 | FL | 26 | 3.42 | Unknown | South Asian | 92.7% |
| 2008 | MI | 26 | 3.80 | Unknown | Caucasian | 89.5% |
| 2008 | NY | 25 | 2.80 | Unknown | None Indicated | 19.9% |
| 2008 | CO | 24 | 3.70 | Unknown | Caucasian | 75.6% |
| 2008 | OH | 24 | 3.98 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 90.4% |
| 2008 | FL | 22 | 3.00 | Top 20% | African-American | 20.1% |
| 2008 | (Private) | 16 | 3.30 | Bottom 50% | Caucasian | 2.4% |
| 2007 | AR | 2300 | 3.73 | Top 10% | African-American | 98.0% |
| 2007 | NJ | 2180 | 3.50 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 97.0% |
| 2007 | FL | 2030 | 3.75 | Top 5% | African-American | 99.4% |
| 2007 | NY | 1910 | 3.60 | Class Not Ranked | African-American | 75.8% |
| 2007 | VA | 1790 | 3.30 | Unknown | Caucasian | 64.1% |
| 2007 | XX | 1700 | 3.20 | Unknown | Hispanic | 20.6% |
| 2007 | PA | 1640 | 3.77 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 75.1% |
| 2007 | NJ | 1380 | 3.00 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 77.5% |
| 2007 | OH | 32 | 3.63 | Unknown | Caucasian | 97.3% |
| 2007 | IL | 27 | 3.40 | Top 30% | Caucasian | 68.9% |
| 2007 | MI | 17 | 4.00 | Top 5% | African-American | 23.0% |
| 2006 | MA | 1680 | 3.61 | Unknown | None Indicated | 71.7% |
| |