University of Maryland, College Park Applications and Decisions
Below is a list of applicants who have demonstrated interest in University of Maryland, College Park. Our best formula
for this college is based on
201 members who were accepted or rejected. The formula
has a college admissions prediction accuracy of
90%?.
Because not all members have filled out the most recent version of our survey, some predictions are made based on
less-accurate models. Those are noted with an asterisk (*) next to their prediction.
This is a very popular school, and you're looking at the whole list. If you
would like to only see completed applications,
click here for a smaller version of this page.
|
| 2010 | MD | 2130 | 3.70 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 99.5% |
| 2010 | MD | 1890 | 3.72 | Top 15% | Middle-Eastern | 96.7% |
| 2010 | MD | 1870 | 3.71 | Top 15% | East Asian | 96.0% |
| 2010 | MD | 1690 | 3.60 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 81.0% |
| 2009 | MD | 2130 | 3.96 | Top 5% | East Asian | 99.7% |
| 2009 | PA | 2070 | 3.36 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 91.8% |
| 2009 | SC | 1930 | 3.60 | Unknown | Caucasian | 89.1% |
| 2009 | NJ | 1920 | 3.60 | Class Not Ranked | Other | 86.5% |
| 2009 | CT | 1910 | 3.20 | Unknown | African-American | 68.2% |
| 2009 | CT | 1810 | 3.57 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 71.6% |
| 2009 | MD | 1800 | 2.30 | Unknown | South Asian | 27.5% |
| 2009 | VA | 27 | 3.13 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 48.6% |
| 2008 | (Private) | 2230 | 3.85 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 99.8% |
| 2008 | MD | 2040 | 3.76 | Top 10% | South Asian | 99.1% |
| 2008 | NY | 30 | 3.80 | Top 30% | Other | 95.3% |
| 2005 | CT | 1310 | 3.50 | Unknown | None Indicated | 87.7% |
|
| 2011 | FL | 1400 | 4.00 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 98.7% |
| 2010 | MD | 2370 | 2.88 | Top 4% | Caucasian | 99.4% |
| 2010 | MD | 2360 | 4.00 | Top 3% | None Indicated | 100.0% |
| 2010 | MD | 2360 | 3.95 | Top 3% | Caucasian | 100.0% |
| 2010 | MD | 2350 | 3.92 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 99.9% |
| 2010 | (Private) | 2350 | 3.90 | Class Not Ranked | East Asian | 99.9% |
| 2010 | (Private) | 2350 | 3.40 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 99.8% |
| 2010 | FL | 2320 | 3.94 | Valedictorian | Caucasian | 99.7% |
| 2010 | MD | 2310 | 3.71 | Class Not Ranked | East Asian | 99.9% |
| 2010 | NJ | 2300 | 3.89 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 99.6% |
| 2010 | MD | 2290 | 3.64 | Top 20% | East Asian | 99.8% |
| 2010 | MD | 2280 | 4.00 | Top 2% | Caucasian | 99.9% |
| 2010 | MD | 2280 | 3.67 | Top 10% | East Asian | 99.8% |
| 2010 | MD | 2270 | 3.80 | Top 15% | South Asian | 99.9% |
| 2010 | MA | 2270 | 3.20 | Unknown | Caucasian | 97.4% |
| 2010 | MD | 2260 | 3.86 | Top 2% | Caucasian | 99.9% |
| 2010 | PA | 2250 | 3.99 | Top 1% | South Asian | 99.6% |
| 2010 | MD | 2250 | 3.80 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 99.8% |
| 2010 | IL | 2240 | 3.05 | Unknown | East Asian | 95.3% |
| 2010 | PA | 2240 | 4.00 | Valedictorian | Caucasian | 99.6% |
| 2010 | MD | 2240 | 3.96 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 99.9% |
| 2010 | (Private) | 2240 | 3.95 | Top 5% | East Asian | 99.9% |
| 2010 | MD | 2240 | 3.90 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 99.9% |
| 2010 | MD | 2230 | 3.64 | Top 15% | East Asian | 99.7% |
| 2010 | MD | 2220 | 3.40 | Unknown | East Asian | 99.4% |
| 2010 | MD | 2220 | 3.63 | Top 3% | None Indicated | 99.7% |
| 2010 | PA | 2210 | 3.89 | Top 3% | Caucasian | 99.3% |
| 2010 | NJ | 2200 | 4.00 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 99.4% |
| 2010 | MD | 2190 | 3.15 | Class Not Ranked | East Asian | 98.7% |
| 2010 | GA | 2180 | 3.81 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 98.9% |
| 2010 | MD | 2170 | 3.81 | Class Not Ranked | None Indicated | 99.7% |
| 2010 | MD | 2160 | 3.98 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 99.8% |
| 2010 | MD | 2160 | 3.64 | Top 15% | Caucasian | 99.5% |
| 2010 | MD | 2160 | 3.95 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 99.8% |
| 2010 | MD | 2140 | 3.25 | Class Not Ranked | South Asian | 98.5% |
| 2010 | MD | 2130 | 3.88 | Top 4% | Native American | 99.7% |
| 2010 | MD | 2120 | 3.63 | Top 40% | Caucasian | 99.6% |
| 2010 | NY | 2120 | 3.87 | Top 10% | Other | 98.6% |
| 2010 | MD | 2110 | 3.89 | Unknown | South Asian | 99.6% |
| 2010 | MD | 2110 | 3.16 | Bottom 50% | Caucasian | 97.1% |
| 2010 | NH | 2110 | 3.62 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 96.9% |
| 2010 | RI | 2100 | 3.90 | Top 3% | Caucasian | 98.4% |
| 2010 | RI | 2100 | 3.90 | Valedictorian | Caucasian | 98.4% |
| 2010 | (Private) | 2100 | 3.96 | Top 3% | Caucasian | 99.7% |
| 2010 | MD | 2100 | 3.57 | Top 20% | East Asian | 99.0% |
| 2010 | MD | 2090 | 4.00 | Top 2% | Caucasian | 99.8% |
| 2010 | (Private) | 2090 | 3.72 | Class Not Ranked | South Asian | 99.5% |
| 2010 | NJ | 2090 | 3.35 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 92.9% |
| 2010 | FL | 2090 | 3.80 | Top 3% | Hispanic | 97.8% |
| 2010 | MD | 2080 | 3.95 | Top 5% | Middle-Eastern | 99.6% |
| 2010 | NY | 2080 | 3.68 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 96.6% |
| 2010 | MD | 2070 | 3.90 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 99.5% |
| 2010 | NJ | 2070 | 3.50 | Class Not Ranked | African-American | 94.2% |
| 2010 | MD | 2070 | 3.73 | Unknown | East Asian | 99.2% |
| 2010 | CA | 2060 | 3.40 | Bottom 50% | Hispanic | 90.8% |
| 2010 | MD | 2060 | 4.00 | Top 1% | Other | 99.6% |
| 2010 | MD | 2060 | 3.95 | Top 5% | Other | 99.5% |
| 2010 | MD | 2050 | 3.50 | Top 25% | Caucasian | 99.1% |
| 2010 | MA | 2040 | 3.60 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 94.5% |
| 2010 | (Private) | 2040 | 3.85 | Top 2% | Caucasian | 99.3% |
| 2010 | NY | 2040 | 4.00 | Top 15% | Caucasian | 97.9% |
| 2010 | MA | 2040 | 3.87 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 97.1% |
| 2010 | KY | 2030 | 3.70 | Top 25% | Caucasian | 97.7% |
| 2010 | NY | 2030 | 3.50 | Top 15% | Caucasian | 92.3% |
| 2010 | MD | 2030 | 4.00 | Top 5% | East Asian | 99.5% |
| 2010 | VA | 2020 | 3.65 | Top 15% | East Asian | 94.1% |
| 2010 | NY | 2010 | 3.94 | Salutatorian | Caucasian | 97.1% |
| 2010 | MD | 2000 | 3.30 | Top 25% | East Asian | 97.5% |
| 2010 | VA | 2000 | 3.53 | Top 5% | African-American | 91.5% |
| 2010 | PA | 2000 | 3.70 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 94.2% |
| 2010 | MD | 2000 | 3.81 | Class Not Ranked | Hispanic | 98.9% |
| 2010 | NY | 2000 | 3.70 | Class Not Ranked | Middle-Eastern | 94.0% |
| 2010 | CA | 1990 | 3.40 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 86.9% |
| 2010 | XX | 1990 | 3.80 | Top 5% | East Asian | 95.1% |
| 2010 | (Private) | 1990 | 3.76 | Top 15% | Caucasian | 98.6% |
| 2010 | PA | 1980 | 3.70 | Top 25% | None Indicated | 92.7% |
| 2010 | MD | 1980 | 3.80 | Top 20% | African-American | 98.6% |
| 2010 | MD | 1980 | 3.80 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 98.7% |
| 2010 | VA | 1980 | 3.31 | Unknown | South Asian | 83.1% |
| 2010 | NY | 1970 | 3.64 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 91.4% |
| 2010 | NY | 1960 | 3.86 | Top 15% | Caucasian | 96.2% |
| 2010 | DE | 1960 | 4.00 | Top 1% | Hispanic | 97.5% |
| 2010 | MD | 1960 | 3.60 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 97.3% |
| 2010 | NJ | 1930 | 3.50 | Top 25% | Caucasian | 83.5% |
| 2010 | MD | 1930 | 3.60 | Top 15% | Caucasian | 96.7% |
| 2010 | NJ | 1920 | 3.85 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 94.1% |
| 2010 | NY | 1920 | 3.60 | Top 20% | Other | 86.2% |
| 2010 | MD | 1910 | 3.75 | Class Not Ranked | East Asian | 97.4% |
| 2010 | (Private) | 1900 | 3.70 | Top 15% | Caucasian | 87.5% |
| 2010 | OH | 1890 | 2.80 | Top 25% | African-American | 38.3% |
| 2010 | MD | 1870 | 3.41 | Top 15% | None Indicated | 91.8% |
| 2010 | MD | 1870 | 3.57 | Top 30% | Caucasian | 94.0% |
| 2010 | MD | 1870 | 3.79 | Top 4% | Caucasian | 96.9% |
| 2010 | NY | 1830 | 3.00 | Top 40% | Caucasian | 37.3% |
| 2010 | NJ | 1820 | 3.40 | Class Not Ranked | East Asian | 75.2% |
| 2010 | MN | 1820 | 3.60 | Top 20% | East Asian | 75.4% |
| 2010 | MA | 1810 | 3.40 | Class Not Ranked | East Asian | 61.5% |
| 2010 | MD | 1800 | 3.30 | Top 35% | Hispanic | 81.5% |
| 2010 | MD | 1800 | 3.64 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 92.3% |
| 2010 | MD | 1800 | 3.80 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 94.5% |
| 2010 | NJ | 1780 | 3.63 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 68.8% |
| 2010 | NY | 1780 | 3.80 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 78.2% |
| 2010 | MD | 1760 | 3.70 | Unknown | East Asian | 90.9% |
| 2010 | CT | 1750 | 3.20 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 36.7% |
| 2010 | MD | 1710 | 3.20 | Bottom 40% | East Asian | 59.5% |
| 2010 | PA | 1450 | 4.00 | Top 1% | Caucasian | 99.3% |
| 2010 | PA | 1340 | 3.30 | Top 20% | Hispanic | 85.6% |
| 2010 | NJ | 33 | 4.00 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 99.4% |
| 2010 | MD | 31 | 3.47 | Top 10% | South Asian | 98.5% |
| 2010 | NY | 31 | 3.94 | Class Not Ranked | East Asian | 98.1% |
| 2010 | (Private) | 30 | 3.52 | Class Not Ranked | African-American | 97.9% |
| 2010 | NY | 27 | 3.90 | Top 10% | None Indicated | 87.4% |
| 2010 | NJ | 25 | 3.73 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 65.6% |
| 2009 | NJ | 2400 | 3.80 | Class Not Ranked | Other | 99.8% |
| 2009 | (Private) | 2350 | 3.80 | Class Not Ranked | East Asian | 99.7% |
| 2009 | MD | 2350 | 4.00 | Top 1% | Caucasian | 100.0% |
| 2009 | MD | 2330 | 4.00 | Top 5% | South Asian | 100.0% |
| 2009 | NC | 2290 | 3.90 | Top 5% | Other | 99.8% |
| 2009 | CA | 2290 | 3.90 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 99.6% |
| 2009 | MD | 2270 | 3.65 | Unknown | Caucasian | 99.8% |
| 2009 | PA | 2240 | 3.89 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 99.5% |
| 2009 | (Private) | 2240 | 3.75 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 99.2% |
| 2009 | VA | 2230 | 3.90 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 99.4% |
| 2009 | GA | 2230 | 3.50 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 98.3% |
| 2009 | MD | 2220 | 3.75 | Top 5% | None Indicated | 99.8% |
| 2009 | CT | 2210 | 3.63 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 98.7% |
| 2009 | MD | 2210 | 3.57 | Unknown | None Indicated | 99.6% |
| 2009 | MD | 2210 | 4.00 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 99.9% |
| 2009 | MD | 2200 | 3.43 | Unknown | South Asian | 99.4% |
| 2009 | MD | 2200 | 3.57 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 99.6% |
| 2009 | PA | 2200 | 3.85 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 99.2% |
| 2009 | NJ | 2200 | 3.70 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 98.7% |
| 2009 | VA | 2190 | 3.70 | Class Not Ranked | None Indicated | 98.6% |
| 2009 | MD | 2190 | 4.00 | Top 1% | South Asian | 99.9% |
| 2009 | MD | 2180 | 3.41 | Class Not Ranked | South Asian | 99.3% |
| 2009 | VA | 2160 | 4.00 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 99.2% |
| 2009 | MD | 2130 | 3.65 | Top 20% | East Asian | 99.4% |
| 2009 | NJ | 2130 | 3.30 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 94.0% |
| 2009 | NJ | 2130 | 3.46 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 96.0% |
| 2009 | MD | 2120 | 3.90 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 99.7% |
| 2009 | MD | 2120 | 3.40 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 98.7% |
| 2009 | TX | 2110 | 3.70 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 97.4% |
| 2009 | MA | 2110 | 3.87 | Top 1% | African-American | 98.4% |
| 2009 | (Private) | 2110 | 3.20 | Bottom 50% | None Indicated | 89.6% |
| 2009 | NJ | 2100 | 3.70 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 97.1% |
| 2009 | MD | 2090 | 3.81 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 99.5% |
| 2009 | NY | 2080 | 4.00 | Top 1% | Caucasian | 98.5% |
| 2009 | PA | 2070 | 3.85 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 98.5% |
| 2009 | MD | 2070 | 3.71 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 99.1% |
| 2009 | NY | 2050 | 3.84 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 97.6% |
| 2009 | (Private) | 2050 | 3.86 | Top 5% | East Asian | 99.4% |
| 2009 | (Private) | 2040 | 3.70 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 96.4% |
| 2009 | NY | 2030 | 3.70 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 95.1% |
| 2009 | NJ | 2020 | 3.70 | Top 1% | Other | 96.7% |
| 2009 | NH | 2020 | 3.87 | Top 5% | South Asian | 96.7% |
| 2009 | MD | 2020 | 3.72 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 98.8% |
| 2009 | MD | 2020 | 4.00 | Top 1% | Caucasian | 99.4% |
| 2009 | (Private) | 2010 | 3.98 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 99.4% |
| 2009 | MD | 2000 | 4.00 | Valedictorian | African-American | 99.4% |
| 2009 | FL | 2000 | 3.69 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 93.9% |
| 2009 | PA | 2000 | 3.84 | Class Not Ranked | Middle-Eastern | 95.8% |
| 2009 | VA | 1960 | 3.47 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 86.6% |
| 2009 | NY | 1960 | 3.70 | Top 10% | African-American | 92.1% |
| 2009 | NY | 1960 | 3.80 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 93.9% |
| 2009 | PA | 1960 | 3.63 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 90.9% |
| 2009 | MD | 1960 | 3.55 | Class Not Ranked | East Asian | 97.0% |
| 2009 | MA | 1950 | 3.35 | Top 30% | Caucasian | 79.9% |
| 2009 | NJ | 1950 | 3.84 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 93.9% |
| 2009 | NY | 1940 | 4.00 | Top 10% | None Indicated | 99.0% |
| 2009 | MD | 1940 | 3.80 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 98.2% |
| 2009 | NJ | 1930 | 3.78 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 93.0% |
| 2009 | NY | 1930 | 3.90 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 93.8% |
| 2009 | RI | 1930 | 3.41 | Class Not Ranked | South Asian | 80.9% |
| 2009 | MD | 1930 | 3.50 | Top 25% | Caucasian | 95.6% |
| 2009 | MD | 1920 | 3.83 | Top 5% | Hispanic | 98.1% |
| 2009 | WA | 1910 | 3.48 | Top 30% | East Asian | 80.3% |
| 2009 | MD | 1910 | 3.83 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 97.8% |
| 2009 | MD | 1890 | 3.69 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 99.5% |
| 2009 | CA | 1880 | 3.67 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 84.6% |
| 2009 | MD | 1880 | 3.46 | Top 5% | None Indicated | 93.7% |
| 2009 | MD | 1880 | 3.48 | Unknown | Caucasian | 93.7% |
| 2009 | MD | 1880 | 3.62 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 95.4% |
| 2009 | NY | 1880 | 3.65 | Top 30% | Caucasian | 83.2% |
| 2009 | MD | 1870 | 3.60 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 95.5% |
| 2009 | MD | 1870 | 3.55 | Top 40% | Caucasian | 93.4% |
| 2009 | PA | 1850 | 3.90 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 89.1% |
| 2009 | CA | 1850 | 3.65 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 80.4% |
| 2009 | MD | 1850 | 3.60 | Top 30% | African-American | 93.6% |
| 2009 | MD | 1850 | 3.57 | Unknown | South Asian | 93.6% |
| 2009 | MD | 1830 | 3.48 | Unknown | Caucasian | 94.1% |
| 2009 | NJ | 1830 | 3.78 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 83.6% |
| 2009 | MD | 1820 | 3.20 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 82.8% |
| 2009 | MD | 1760 | 3.50 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 91.2% |
| 2009 | NJ | 1760 | 3.52 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 71.9% |
| 2009 | PA | 1750 | 3.70 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 68.6% |
| 2009 | MD | 1750 | 3.54 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 86.1% |
| 2009 | NJ | 1740 | 3.43 | Class Not Ranked | East Asian | 49.9% |
| 2009 | NY | 1710 | 3.50 | Class Not Ranked | African-American | 48.4% |
| 2009 | MD | 1700 | 3.43 | Top 30% | East Asian | 74.2% |
| 2009 | NJ | 1680 | 3.68 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 53.3% |
| 2009 | MD | 1670 | 3.70 | Top 10% | African-American | 88.5% |
| 2009 | MD | 1670 | 3.10 | Class Not Ranked | African-American | 51.3% |
| 2009 | OH | 31 | 3.85 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 97.6% |
| 2009 | CA | 30 | 3.95 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 97.0% |
| 2009 | UT | 29 | 3.70 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 91.1% |
| 2009 | NC | 29 | 3.42 | Top 20% | South Asian | 83.4% |
| 2009 | IL | 28 | 3.50 | Top 20% | East Asian | 79.2% |
| 2009 | NY | 28 | 3.00 | Top 40% | Other | 49.0% |
| 2009 | OH | 28 | 3.80 | Top 30% | Caucasian | 88.7% |
| 2009 | (Private) | 26 | 3.60 | Unknown | Caucasian | 68.7% |
| 2008 | CT | 2370 | 3.98 | Top 1% | Caucasian | 99.8% |
| 2008 | (Private) | 2360 | 4.00 | Valedictorian | East Asian | 100.0% |
| 2008 | MD | 2340 | 4.00 | Top 5% | East Asian | 100.0% |
| 2008 | MD | 2340 | 3.63 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 99.9% |
| 2008 | MD | 2280 | 3.85 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 99.9% |
| 2008 | MD | 2280 | 4.00 | Valedictorian | East Asian | 99.9% |
| 2008 | RI | 2250 | 3.72 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 99.6% |
| 2008 | NJ | 2230 | 3.70 | Unknown | Caucasian | 99.0% |
| 2008 | PA | 2220 | 3.25 | Bottom 50% | East Asian | 96.0% |
| 2008 | MD | 2220 | 3.75 | Top 10% | Middle-Eastern | 99.8% |
| 2008 | (Private) | 2210 | 3.81 | Unknown | Caucasian | 99.8% |
| 2008 | MD | 2200 | 3.90 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 99.8% |
| 2008 | (Private) | 2190 | 3.87 | Top 10% | East Asian | 99.1% |
| 2008 | VA | 2180 | 3.66 | Unknown | Caucasian | 98.3% |
| 2008 | CA | 2130 | 3.25 | Bottom 40% | Caucasian | 91.7% |
| 2008 | MD | 2110 | 3.43 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 98.8% |
| 2008 | PA | 2090 | 3.60 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 96.2% |
| 2008 | MD | 2090 | 3.70 | Top 20% | East Asian | 99.3% |
| 2008 | NY | 2060 | 3.90 | Unknown | Hispanic | 97.7% |
| 2008 | NJ | 2060 | 3.81 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 97.1% |
| 2008 | MD | 2050 | 3.19 | Class Not Ranked | Middle-Eastern | 96.4% |
| 2008 | MD | 2040 | 3.65 | Top 20% | African-American | 98.7% |
| 2008 | MD | 2020 | 3.64 | Top 20% | East Asian | 98.5% |
| 2008 | PA | 2010 | 3.94 | Salutatorian | African-American | 97.1% |
| 2008 | NY | 2010 | 3.65 | Unknown | Caucasian | 93.7% |
| 2008 | MD | 2000 | 3.67 | Unknown | Caucasian | 98.4% |
| 2008 | NY | 2000 | 3.65 | Top 20% | None Indicated | 93.1% |
| 2008 | NJ | 1980 | 3.15 | Top 30% | Caucasian | 75.2% |
| 2008 | MA | 1980 | 3.70 | Top 10% | None Indicated | 93.2% |
| 2008 | CA | 1950 | 3.25 | Top 30% | None Indicated | 75.5% |
| 2008 | NJ | 1930 | 3.70 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 90.1% |
| 2008 | MD | 1930 | 3.70 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 97.5% |
| 2008 | MA | 1930 | 3.03 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 61.0% |
| 2008 | PA | 1920 | 3.80 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 91.9% |
| 2008 | NY | 1910 | 3.80 | Top 20% | East Asian | 90.7% |
| 2008 | MD | 1910 | 3.50 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 95.1% |
| 2008 | MD | 1910 | 3.86 | Top 10% | South Asian | 98.1% |
| 2008 | MD | 1900 | 3.10 | Unknown | Caucasian | 86.6% |
| 2008 | NY | 1900 | 3.50 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 80.4% |
| 2008 | FL | 1840 | 3.67 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 80.6% |
| 2008 | MD | 1830 | 3.74 | Class Not Ranked | South Asian | 95.0% |
| 2008 | MD | 1780 | 3.50 | Top 20% | African-American | 87.1% |
| 2008 | VA | 1750 | 2.75 | Top 40% | Caucasian | 14.2% |
| 2008 | NJ | 1730 | 3.54 | Unknown | Hispanic | 55.1% |
| 2008 | NY | 1530 | 3.64 | Unknown | None Indicated | 99.3% |
| 2008 | MD | 1460 | 4.00 | Unknown | Caucasian | 99.8% |
| 2008 | MD | 33 | 3.76 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 99.7% |
| 2008 | (Private) | 30 | 3.90 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 96.5% |
| 2008 | NY | 29 | 3.95 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 95.3% |
| 2007 | MD | 2330 | 3.85 | Unknown | None Indicated | 99.9% |
| 2007 | MD | 2220 | 3.50 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 99.6% |
| 2007 | MD | 2120 | 3.96 | Top 1% | Caucasian | 99.7% |
| 2007 | NJ | 2070 | 3.90 | Salutatorian | Caucasian | 98.0% |
| 2007 | VA | 1940 | 3.27 | Unknown | South Asian | 76.5% |
| 2007 | NY | 1920 | 3.65 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 90.5% |
| 2007 | MD | 1700 | 3.37 | Unknown | Caucasian | 72.7% |
| 2006 | MD | 2370 | 3.87 | Unknown | None Indicated | 100.0% |
| 2006 | MD | 2160 | 3.69 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 99.6% |
| 2006 | VA | 2020 | 3.90 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 97.0% |
| 2003 | VA | 2240 | 3.90 | Unknown | East Asian | 99.4% |
| 2003 | NJ | 2050 | 3.96 | Top 20% | Hispanic | 97.8% |
| 2002 | VA | 1420 | 4.00 | Salutatorian | Caucasian | 99.7% |
|
|
| 2010 | MD | 1910 | 3.57 | Top 25% | Caucasian | 95.7% |
| 2010 | MD | 1880 | 3.10 | Top 25% | Caucasian | 84.1% |
| 2010 | VA | 1820 | 3.10 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 44.9% |
| 2010 | FL | 1790 | 3.52 | Top 35% | South Asian | 78.8% |
| 2010 | CT | 1790 | 3.80 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 79.8% |
| 2010 | NJ | 1790 | 3.05 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 36.1% |
| 2010 | NJ | 1780 | 3.05 | Class Not Ranked | African-American | 33.9% |
| 2010 | MD | 1780 | 3.50 | Top 30% | South Asian | 86.5% |
| 2010 | MD | 1690 | 3.31 | Bottom 50% | Caucasian | 63.5% |
| 2010 | MD | 1670 | 3.07 | Unknown | South Asian | 49.4% |
| 2010 | VA | 1620 | 3.40 | Top 35% | African-American | 24.3% |
| 2010 | MD | 1570 | 3.47 | Top 30% | South Asian | 59.8% |
| 2010 | XX | 1510 | 3.50 | Top 1% | Middle-Eastern | 17.0% |
| 2009 | MD | 2080 | 3.87 | Top 20% | South Asian | 99.5% |
| 2009 | NJ | 2050 | 3.08 | Class Not Ranked | African-American | 82.6% |
| 2009 | NY | 2020 | 3.00 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 75.2% |
| 2009 | CA | 1900 | 3.50 | Unknown | Caucasian | 80.8% |
| 2009 | MA | 1870 | 2.87 | Class Not Ranked | Hispanic | 39.8% |
| 2009 | NY | 1820 | 3.50 | Top 20% | South Asian | 70.3% |
| 2009 | NY | 1810 | 3.00 | Unknown | Hispanic | 40.4% |
| 2009 | MD | 1810 | 3.14 | Top 30% | African-American | 76.4% |
| 2009 | CT | 1770 | 3.50 | Top 30% | Caucasian | 58.3% |
| 2009 | CT | 1710 | 3.25 | Top 40% | Caucasian | 30.3% |
| 2009 | (Private) | 1710 | 3.75 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 63.4% |
| 2009 | MD | 1670 | 2.75 | Unknown | Caucasian | 30.1% |
| 2009 | MD | 1660 | 3.13 | Top 20% | East Asian | 50.2% |
| 2009 | MD | 1640 | 3.57 | Unknown | Caucasian | 73.4% |
| 2009 | NY | 1570 | 3.50 | Top 5% | African-American | 24.4% |
| 2009 | MD | 1470 | 3.40 | Top 20% | African-American | 30.9% |
| 2009 | CA | 1270 | 2.92 | Bottom 40% | African-American | 0.5% |
| 2009 | MN | 26 | 3.03 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 33.8% |
| 2008 | NJ | 1980 | 3.00 | Unknown | Caucasian | 69.0% |
| 2008 | PA | 1970 | 3.85 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 94.8% |
| 2008 | NJ | 1860 | 3.19 | Unknown | South Asian | 63.9% |
| 2008 | NJ | 1820 | 3.70 | Unknown | Caucasian | 79.1% |
| 2008 | PA | 1760 | 3.39 | Top 20% | South Asian | 50.9% |
| 2008 | NJ | 1450 | 3.40 | Unknown | African-American | 8.4% |
| 2008 | NY | 29 | 3.40 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 82.6% |
| 2007 | PA | 1940 | 3.51 | Top 30% | Caucasian | 84.8% |
|
| 2012 | MD | 1800 | 3.90 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 95.8% |
| 2011 | IL | 2230 | 3.50 | Top 25% | Caucasian | 98.2% |
| 2011 | CA | 1900 | 3.00 | Unknown | None Indicated | 54.0% |
| 2010 | NJ | 2400 | 4.00 | Valedictorian | Hispanic | 99.9% |
| 2010 | MD | 2330 | 3.97 | Salutatorian | Caucasian | 99.9% |
| 2010 | MD | 2330 | 3.89 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 99.9% |
| 2010 | MD | 2320 | 4.00 | Top 1% | East Asian | 99.9% |
| 2010 | MD | 2310 | 4.00 | Top 1% | None Indicated | 99.9% |
| 2010 | NJ | 2310 | 3.94 | Unknown | South Asian | 99.7% |
| 2010 | NJ | 2290 | 3.60 | Top 15% | Caucasian | 99.2% |
| 2010 | MD | 2250 | 3.91 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 99.9% |
| 2010 | MD | 2220 | 3.02 | Bottom 50% | Caucasian | 98.3% |
| 2010 | (Private) | 2200 | 3.97 | Top 2% | Caucasian | 99.9% |
| 2010 | MD | 2200 | 3.90 | Top 10% | Hispanic | 99.8% |
| 2010 | MD | 2200 | 3.96 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 99.8% |
| 2010 | NJ | 2180 | 3.96 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 99.2% |
| 2010 | MD | 2180 | 4.00 | Top 1% | South Asian | 99.8% |
| 2010 | MD | 2180 | 3.75 | Top 5% | East Asian | 99.7% |
| 2010 | NJ | 2170 | 3.80 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 98.8% |
| 2010 | MD | 2160 | 3.76 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 99.7% |
| 2010 | MD | 2160 | 3.91 | Top 5% | East Asian | 99.8% |
| 2010 | MD | 2150 | 3.85 | Top 1% | Caucasian | 99.7% |
| 2010 | CT | 2150 | 3.90 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 98.9% |
| 2010 | MD | 2150 | 3.90 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 99.7% |
| 2010 | PA | 2140 | 2.90 | Unknown | South Asian | 85.9% |
| 2010 | MD | 2140 | 3.70 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 99.5% |
| 2010 | MD | 2130 | 3.88 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 99.8% |
| 2010 | NJ | 2130 | 3.56 | Class Not Ranked | East Asian | 96.8% |
| 2010 | NJ | 2120 | 3.13 | Unknown | Caucasian | 90.5% |
| 2010 | NJ | 2110 | 3.65 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 97.1% |
| 2010 | MD | 2100 | 3.70 | Top 3% | Caucasian | 99.5% |
| 2010 | MA | 2100 | 4.00 | Top 2% | Caucasian | 99.0% |
| 2010 | MD | 2100 | 2.98 | Unknown | Caucasian | 95.9% |
| 2010 | MD | 2100 | 3.97 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 99.7% |
| 2010 | MD | 2100 | 3.75 | Class Not Ranked | East Asian | 99.4% |
| 2010 | MA | 2100 | 3.30 | Top 40% | East Asian | 91.6% |
| 2010 | MD | 2090 | 3.82 | Class Not Ranked | East Asian | 99.9% |
| 2010 | MD | 2090 | 3.76 | Top 15% | Caucasian | 99.4% |
| 2010 | MD | 2090 | 3.76 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 99.4% |
| 2010 | MA | 2070 | 2.90 | Bottom 50% | Caucasian | 74.7% |
| 2010 | NY | 2070 | 3.90 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 98.0% |
| 2010 | CA | 2060 | 2.85 | Top 30% | East Asian | 72.8% |
| 2010 | MD | 2060 | 3.61 | Class Not Ranked | East Asian | 98.9% |
| 2010 | NJ | 2060 | 4.00 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 98.3% |
| 2010 | MA | 2050 | 3.47 | Unknown | East Asian | 92.8% |
| 2010 | NC | 2040 | 3.64 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 94.9% |
| 2010 | MA | 2020 | 3.82 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 97.4% |
| 2010 | PA | 2020 | 3.94 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 97.3% |
| 2010 | MD | 2020 | 2.43 | Bottom 10% | South Asian | 67.2% |
| 2010 | VA | 2020 | 3.26 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 85.2% |
| 2010 | GA | 2010 | 3.70 | Top 10% | None Indicated | 97.8% |
| 2010 | MD | 2010 | 3.92 | Top 3% | Middle-Eastern | 99.3% |
| 2010 | NJ | 2010 | 3.40 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 88.7% |
| 2010 | FL | 2010 | 3.63 | Top 25% | Caucasian | 93.1% |
| 2010 | NJ | 2000 | 3.54 | Top 15% | Caucasian | 96.7% |
| 2010 | FL | 2000 | 3.80 | Top 15% | Caucasian | 98.3% |
| 2010 | CT | 2000 | 3.70 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 96.6% |
| 2010 | MD | 2000 | 3.30 | Class Not Ranked | South Asian | 96.3% |
| 2010 | VA | 2000 | 3.78 | Unknown | Caucasian | 95.1% |
| 2010 | MD | 1990 | 3.90 | Top 15% | Caucasian | 99.2% |
| 2010 | MA | 1990 | 3.70 | Unknown | Caucasian | 93.5% |
| 2010 | NY | 1990 | 3.79 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 94.9% |
| 2010 | FL | 1980 | 4.00 | Top 1% | None Indicated | 96.9% |
| 2010 | NY | 1980 | 3.20 | Top 25% | African-American | 77.9% |
| 2010 | PA | 1980 | 3.81 | Top 15% | Caucasian | 94.7% |
| 2010 | GA | 1970 | 3.00 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 67.5% |
| 2010 | NJ | 1970 | 3.55 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 89.7% |
| 2010 | GA | 1960 | 3.75 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 96.8% |
| 2010 | NY | 1960 | 3.86 | Top 15% | Caucasian | 96.2% |
| 2010 | NC | 1960 | 2.90 | Bottom 30% | Caucasian | 52.4% |
| 2010 | VA | 1950 | 3.28 | Top 25% | Caucasian | 77.3% |
| 2010 | MD | 1950 | 3.65 | Top 15% | Native American | 97.5% |
| 2010 | (Private) | 1940 | 3.80 | Top 25% | Caucasian | 92.3% |
| 2010 | MD | 1930 | 3.43 | Top 25% | African-American | 94.8% |
| 2010 | MD | 1920 | 3.50 | Top 10% | South Asian | 95.6% |
| 2010 | PA | 1920 | 3.70 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 89.7% |
| 2010 | CA | 1910 | 3.70 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 88.8% |
| 2010 | MD | 1910 | 2.40 | Bottom 40% | Caucasian | 48.4% |
| 2010 | MD | 1910 | 3.28 | Top 15% | Caucasian | 91.8% |
| 2010 | FL | 1900 | 3.80 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 90.1% |
| 2010 | NY | 1880 | 3.64 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 83.9% |
| 2010 | MD | 1880 | 3.16 | Top 40% | East Asian | 85.1% |
| 2010 | NY | 1880 | 3.60 | Class Not Ranked | Hispanic | 82.5% |
| 2010 | WA | 1880 | 3.80 | Top 15% | East Asian | 88.7% |
| 2010 | NJ | 1870 | 3.60 | Top 35% | Caucasian | 82.0% |
| 2010 | MD | 1870 | 3.69 | Top 30% | Caucasian | 95.5% |
| 2010 | MD | 1860 | 3.76 | Top 20% | South Asian | 96.1% |
| 2010 | NJ | 1860 | 3.90 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 89.8% |
| 2010 | MD | 1850 | 3.40 | Top 25% | Caucasian | 90.0% |
| 2010 | NC | 1850 | 3.33 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 65.0% |
| 2010 | MD | 1850 | 3.60 | Class Not Ranked | Middle-Eastern | 94.1% |
| 2010 | (Private) | 1840 | 3.85 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 86.5% |
| 2010 | MD | 1840 | 3.39 | Top 30% | South Asian | 88.6% |
| 2010 | MD | 1830 | 3.40 | Top 40% | South Asian | 87.6% |
| 2010 | CT | 1830 | 3.40 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 64.7% |
| 2010 | MD | 1830 | 3.40 | Top 35% | East Asian | 87.9% |
| 2010 | NY | 1820 | 3.50 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 70.9% |
| 2010 | VA | 1820 | 3.57 | Unknown | Caucasian | 73.0% |
| 2010 | MD | 1820 | 3.80 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 95.3% |
| 2010 | RI | 1810 | 3.40 | Top 25% | Middle-Eastern | 60.2% |
| 2010 | NJ | 1800 | 3.45 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 63.4% |
| 2010 | MD | 1800 | 3.50 | Top 5% | East Asian | 89.6% |
| 2010 | NJ | 1790 | 3.20 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 53.0% |
| 2010 | MD | 1790 | 3.95 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 95.9% |
| 2010 | MD | 1790 | 3.43 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 86.4% |
| 2010 | MD | 1790 | 3.34 | Top 40% | Caucasian | 81.6% |
| 2010 | PA | 1780 | 3.80 | Top 15% | Caucasian | 78.6% |
| 2010 | MD | 1760 | 3.46 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 84.4% |
| 2010 | PA | 1730 | 3.70 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 64.9% |
| 2010 | MD | 1730 | 3.31 | Top 25% | Middle-Eastern | 73.4% |
| 2010 | (Private) | 1720 | 3.10 | Bottom 50% | Caucasian | 23.2% |
| 2010 | (Private) | 1720 | 3.79 | Top 5% | Middle-Eastern | 90.5% |
| 2010 | PA | 1710 | 3.64 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 77.2% |
| 2010 | MD | 1710 | 2.90 | Top 25% | Caucasian | 45.0% |
| 2010 | MD | 1710 | 3.37 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 75.1% |
| 2010 | TN | 1700 | 3.81 | Top 10% | Hispanic | 70.6% |
| 2010 | MD | 1700 | 2.95 | Top 40% | Caucasian | 44.5% |
| 2010 | MD | 1680 | 3.29 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 64.2% |
| 2010 | MD | 1680 | 3.47 | Top 20% | East Asian | 74.0% |
| 2010 | MD | 1670 | 2.71 | Unknown | African-American | 28.0% |
| 2010 | NJ | 1650 | 3.12 | Top 40% | Caucasian | 36.2% |
| 2010 | MD | 1650 | 3.70 | Top 25% | Caucasian | 79.7% |
| 2010 | MD | 1640 | 3.18 | Class Not Ranked | African-American | 50.5% |
| 2010 | MD | 1610 | 4.00 | Top 4% | East Asian | 87.4% |
| 2010 | MD | 1610 | 3.57 | Class Not Ranked | East Asian | 68.5% |
| 2010 | VA | 1600 | 3.62 | Class Not Ranked | African-American | 47.1% |
| 2010 | DE | 1600 | 3.50 | Top 15% | African-American | 28.0% |
| 2010 | NJ | 1550 | 3.83 | Top 15% | Caucasian | 38.2% |
| 2010 | MD | 1540 | 3.12 | Bottom 40% | Middle-Eastern | 23.6% |
| 2010 | MD | 1520 | 3.19 | Top 25% | South Asian | 27.7% |
| 2010 | FL | 1510 | 3.30 | Top 40% | African-American | 9.1% |
| 2010 | MD | 1510 | 3.19 | Top 40% | East Asian | 24.4% |
| 2010 | DE | 1450 | 3.50 | Top 5% | African-American | 11.1% |
| 2010 | MD | 34 | 4.00 | Top 10% | None Indicated | 99.9% |
| 2010 | NJ | 32 | 4.00 | Top 2% | Caucasian | 99.0% |
| 2010 | FL | 32 | 3.50 | Top 3% | Caucasian | 96.6% |
| 2010 | VA | 31 | 3.70 | Class Not Ranked | East Asian | 96.5% |
| 2010 | PA | 31 | 3.40 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 92.7% |
| 2010 | CT | 30 | 3.70 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 94.6% |
| 2010 | NY | 30 | 3.52 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 91.5% |
| 2010 | (Private) | 30 | 4.00 | Salutatorian | Caucasian | 97.5% |
| 2010 | FL | 28 | 3.81 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 89.6% |
| 2010 | NY | 28 | 3.50 | Top 25% | South Asian | 78.8% |
| 2010 | FL | 28 | 3.00 | Top 30% | East Asian | 50.2% |
| 2010 | MD | 27 | 2.90 | Unknown | Caucasian | 69.1% |
| 2010 | MS | 26 | 3.90 | Top 10% | South Asian | 82.9% |
| 2010 | OH | 26 | 3.30 | Bottom 50% | Caucasian | 46.0% |
| 2009 | MD | 2400 | 3.50 | Top 5% | Other | 99.9% |
| 2009 | NY | 2310 | 4.00 | Unknown | Caucasian | 99.7% |
| 2009 | PR | 2270 | 3.80 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 99.5% |
| 2009 | MD | 2240 | 4.00 | Top 1% | East Asian | 99.9% |
| 2009 | NJ | 2230 | 3.67 | Top 10% | South Asian | 99.2% |
| 2009 | MD | 2230 | 4.00 | Top 5% | East Asian | 99.9% |
| 2009 | MD | 2230 | 3.70 | Top 10% | South Asian | 99.8% |
| 2009 | NJ | 2220 | 3.50 | Unknown | South Asian | 98.7% |
| 2009 | NJ | 2190 | 3.50 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 97.8% |
| 2009 | MD | 2170 | 4.00 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 99.9% |
| 2009 | NJ | 2170 | 3.76 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 98.6% |
| 2009 | NJ | 2130 | 3.46 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 96.0% |
| 2009 | PA | 2120 | 3.75 | Top 20% | Hispanic | 97.8% |
| 2009 | MD | 2110 | 3.95 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 99.9% |
| 2009 | MD | 2090 | 3.23 | Top 30% | East Asian | 97.5% |
| 2009 | OH | 2080 | 3.80 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 99.7% |
| 2009 | MD | 2060 | 3.61 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 98.9% |
| 2009 | MD | 2060 | 3.96 | Top 10% | East Asian | 99.5% |
| 2009 | NJ | 2040 | 3.65 | Top 40% | Caucasian | 94.3% |
| 2009 | VA | 2020 | 3.80 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 96.0% |
| 2009 | NJ | 2020 | 3.90 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 97.0% |
| 2009 | MD | 2010 | 3.45 | Top 30% | Caucasian | 97.2% |
| 2009 | NY | 2000 | 2.80 | Class Not Ranked | Hispanic | 61.2% |
| 2009 | MD | 1990 | 3.96 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 99.2% |
| 2009 | NJ | 1990 | 3.50 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 89.6% |
| 2009 | VA | 1980 | 3.42 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 97.2% |
| 2009 | NY | 1980 | 3.70 | Unknown | Hispanic | 93.0% |
| 2009 | NY | 1980 | 3.47 | Class Not Ranked | Hispanic | 88.1% |
| 2009 | NY | 1970 | 3.70 | Top 30% | Caucasian | 94.0% |
| 2009 | MD | 1970 | 3.30 | Bottom 40% | Caucasian | 93.8% |
| 2009 | XX | 1960 | 4.00 | Valedictorian | East Asian | 96.3% |
| 2009 | NJ | 1950 | 3.10 | Class Not Ranked | East Asian | 69.4% |
| 2009 | NJ | 1950 | 3.86 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 94.1% |
| 2009 | NJ | 1940 | 3.49 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 85.1% |
| 2009 | NJ | 1940 | 3.39 | Unknown | Other | 81.6% |
| 2009 | MD | 1930 | 3.30 | Top 40% | East Asian | 92.3% |
| 2009 | MD | 1930 | 3.75 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 97.8% |
| 2009 | NJ | 1910 | 3.75 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 89.8% |
| 2009 | MD | 1910 | 3.72 | Top 30% | Hispanic | 97.0% |
| 2009 | MD | 1880 | 3.00 | Top 30% | Caucasian | 80.0% |
| 2009 | MD | 1880 | 4.00 | Valedictorian | African-American | 98.4% |
| 2009 | GA | 1880 | 3.89 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 91.2% |
| 2009 | MD | 1870 | 3.57 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 94.5% |
| 2009 | MD | 1860 | 3.73 | Top 1% | African-American | 96.2% |
| 2009 | MA | 1860 | 3.88 | Top 10% | Hispanic | 89.3% |
| 2009 | NY | 1850 | 3.50 | Top 30% | Caucasian | 72.7% |
| 2009 | NY | 1840 | 3.66 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 79.7% |
| 2009 | TX | 1820 | 3.20 | Top 30% | Caucasian | 62.7% |
| 2009 | MD | 1820 | 3.20 | Bottom 50% | Caucasian | 78.9% |
| 2009 | NJ | 1810 | 3.20 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 48.9% |
| 2009 | VA | 1800 | 3.20 | Class Not Ranked | African-American | 47.1% |
| 2009 | NJ | 1800 | 3.40 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 59.8% |
| 2009 | FL | 1790 | 3.40 | Bottom 50% | South Asian | 53.6% |
| 2009 | MD | 1790 | 3.30 | Class Not Ranked | South Asian | 82.0% |
| 2009 | XX | 1750 | 3.20 | Top 30% | Caucasian | 35.5% |
| 2009 | FL | 1730 | 3.80 | Unknown | Caucasian | 93.1% |
| 2009 | FL | 1730 | 3.43 | Top 10% | South Asian | 48.7% |
| 2009 | MD | 1690 | 3.22 | Class Not Ranked | Hispanic | 62.3% |
| 2009 | NY | 1660 | 3.80 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 70.0% |
| 2009 | (Private) | 1660 | 2.85 | Class Not Ranked | African-American | 10.6% |
| 2009 | PA | 1660 | 3.80 | Top 40% | Caucasian | 54.2% |
| 2009 | MD | 1560 | 3.86 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 82.1% |
| 2009 | MD | 1540 | 3.68 | Top 5% | African-American | 63.1% |
| 2009 | NY | 1510 | 3.50 | Top 30% | African-American | 15.0% |
| 2009 | MD | 1470 | 3.88 | Top 1% | African-American | 62.8% |
| 2009 | MD | 1080 | 3.75 | Top 20% | African-American | 22.8% |
| 2009 | DE | 30 | 3.40 | Unknown | Caucasian | 88.7% |
| 2009 | NJ | 29 | 3.50 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 86.3% |
| 2009 | OH | 29 | 3.59 | Unknown | Caucasian | 88.8% |
| 2009 | NJ | 28 | 3.48 | Unknown | Caucasian | 78.8% |
| 2009 | MD | 27 | 3.60 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 93.0% |
| 2009 | KY | 26 | 3.90 | Top 20% | East Asian | 82.2% |
| 2009 | LA | 25 | 3.30 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 38.8% |
| 2008 | MD | 2340 | 4.00 | Top 5% | East Asian | 100.0% |
| 2008 | MD | 2320 | 3.97 | Top 5% | East Asian | 99.9% |
| 2008 | MD | 2300 | 3.90 | Top 5% | South Asian | 99.9% |
| 2008 | MD | 2280 | 4.00 | Valedictorian | South Asian | 99.9% |
| 2008 | MD | 2270 | 3.95 | Top 5% | East Asian | 99.9% |
| 2008 | MD | 2270 | 3.74 | Unknown | East Asian | 99.8% |
| 2008 | NJ | 2260 | 3.85 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 99.5% |
| 2008 | NJ | 2240 | 3.43 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 98.2% |
| 2008 | PA | 2240 | 3.80 | Top 5% | Other | 99.3% |
| 2008 | MD | 2220 | 3.75 | Unknown | Caucasian | 99.8% |
| 2008 | (Private) | 2190 | 3.82 | Top 10% | East Asian | 99.8% |
| 2008 | MD | 2170 | 3.80 | Top 5% | African-American | 99.7% |
| 2008 | MD | 2160 | 3.88 | Top 10% | South Asian | 99.7% |
| 2008 | PA | 2150 | 3.78 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 98.5% |
| 2008 | MD | 2150 | 3.91 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 99.7% |
| 2008 | MD | 2140 | 4.00 | Top 1% | African-American | 99.8% |
| 2008 | NY | 2130 | 3.85 | Unknown | East Asian | 99.0% |
| 2008 | (Private) | 2120 | 3.50 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 96.3% |
| 2008 | VA | 2120 | 3.52 | Unknown | None Indicated | 96.3% |
| 2008 | NJ | 2100 | 3.40 | Top 30% | Caucasian | 93.7% |
| 2008 | MD | 2100 | 3.40 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 98.6% |
| 2008 | MD | 2090 | 3.96 | Top 5% | East Asian | 99.6% |
| 2008 | MD | 2090 | 3.95 | Top 5% | None Indicated | 99.6% |
| 2008 | NJ | 2090 | 3.70 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 97.0% |
| 2008 | NY | 2060 | 3.80 | Unknown | None Indicated | 97.0% |
| 2008 | NY | 2060 | 3.60 | Unknown | African-American | 95.2% |
| 2008 | NJ | 2060 | 3.47 | Unknown | Caucasian | 93.4% |
| 2008 | MD | 2030 | 3.57 | Top 20% | African-American | 98.8% |
| 2008 | NY | 2030 | 3.94 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 97.5% |
| 2008 | MD | 2030 | 3.40 | Unknown | Caucasian | 97.5% |
| 2008 | MD | 1990 | 3.96 | Unknown | Other | 99.2% |
| 2008 | NY | 1990 | 3.55 | Unknown | Caucasian | 90.7% |
| 2008 | MD | 1980 | 3.52 | Unknown | South Asian | 97.3% |
| 2008 | NJ | 1980 | 3.28 | Top 30% | Caucasian | 80.9% |
| 2008 | PA | 1980 | 4.00 | Salutatorian | Caucasian | 96.9% |
| 2008 | NY | 1950 | 3.85 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 94.1% |
| 2008 | NY | 1940 | 3.70 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 90.5% |
| 2008 | VA | 1930 | 3.10 | Top 30% | East Asian | 64.0% |
| 2008 | MD | 1920 | 3.10 | Unknown | None Indicated | 88.4% |
| 2008 | NY | 1920 | 4.00 | Unknown | Caucasian | 94.7% |
| 2008 | MD | 1900 | 3.95 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 99.6% |
| 2008 | (Private) | 1890 | 3.60 | Unknown | Caucasian | 95.6% |
| 2008 | (Private) | 1890 | 3.65 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 85.5% |
| 2008 | NJ | 1880 | 3.81 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 89.2% |
| 2008 | FL | 1870 | 3.25 | Top 20% | South Asian | 63.0% |
| 2008 | PA | 1870 | 3.60 | Unknown | Caucasian | 81.1% |
| 2008 | NY | 1830 | 3.70 | Unknown | Caucasian | 80.2% |
| 2008 | MD | 1820 | 3.40 | Top 20% | Other | 87.9% |
| 2008 | NJ | 1810 | 4.00 | Unknown | Caucasian | 88.1% |
| 2008 | MD | 1810 | 3.65 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 92.6% |
| 2008 | NY | 1790 | 3.40 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 74.7% |
| 2008 | NY | 1770 | 3.80 | Top 10% | African-American | 79.0% |
| 2008 | PA | 1770 | 3.00 | Top 30% | East Asian | 28.0% |
| 2008 | NY | 1770 | 3.30 | Unknown | Caucasian | 47.5% |
| 2008 | MA | 1760 | 3.70 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 70.6% |
| 2008 | NY | 1730 | 3.50 | Class Not Ranked | African-American | 52.6% |
| 2008 | NJ | 1720 | 3.50 | Unknown | Hispanic | 50.2% |
| 2008 | MD | 1710 | 3.69 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 86.4% |
| 2008 | GA | 1690 | 3.93 | Top 20% | Middle-Eastern | 69.9% |
| 2008 | MD | 1690 | 3.38 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 70.8% |
| 2008 | XX | 1620 | 3.90 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 55.4% |
| 2008 | XX | 1620 | 3.70 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 44.0% |
| 2008 | NY | 1550 | 3.50 | Top 30% | Caucasian | 61.2% |
| 2008 | NY | 1550 | 3.00 | Unknown | Caucasian | 6.9% |
| 2008 | MD | 1550 | 3.00 | Unknown | African-American | 23.9% |
| 2008 | MD | 1470 | 3.24 | Unknown | East Asian | 23.4% |
| 2008 | NY | 1450 | 3.50 | Top 30% | Caucasian | 12.7% |
| 2008 | AK | 1200 | 2.00 | Top 1% | None Indicated | 0.0% |
| 2008 | VA | 1190 | 3.00 | Bottom 20% | Caucasian | 0.3% |
| 2008 | NJ | 1110 | 3.61 | Unknown | Caucasian | 1.0% |
| 2008 | PA | 900 | 3.40 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 3.9% |
| 2008 | OH | 36 | 4.00 | Top 1% | Caucasian | 99.9% |
| 2008 | IL | 34 | 3.80 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 99.4% |
| 2008 | NY | 31 | 4.00 | Unknown | Caucasian | 98.3% |
| 2008 | MI | 30 | 4.00 | Valedictorian | Caucasian | 97.5% |
| 2008 | PA | 28 | 3.50 | Unknown | Caucasian | 79.7% |
| 2008 | PR | 27 | 3.80 | Unknown | Hispanic | 84.0% |
| 2008 | (Private) | 22 | 3.50 | Unknown | African-American | 20.2% |
| 2008 | NY | 21 | 3.10 | Bottom 50% | African-American | 4.5% |
| 2007 | MD | 2270 | 3.30 | Top 40% | Caucasian | 99.5% |
| 2007 | MD | 2230 | 3.86 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 99.8% |
| 2007 | MD | 2220 | 3.85 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 99.8% |
| 2007 | MD | 2020 | 4.00 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 99.4% |
| 2007 | FL | 1880 | 3.56 | Top 20% | South Asian | 80.6% |
| 2007 | MD | 1870 | 3.61 | Top 5% | Other | 95.2% |
| 2007 | MD | 1830 | 3.20 | Bottom 50% | Caucasian | 80.1% |
|
| 2012 | MD | 2400 | 3.71 | Class Not Ranked | East Asian | 99.9% |
| 2012 | IL | 2240 | 3.50 | Class Not Ranked | East Asian | 98.5% |
| 2012 | MD | 2240 | 3.86 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 99.9% |
| 2012 | MD | 2230 | 3.80 | Unknown | Caucasian | 99.9% |
| 2012 | MD | 2220 | 4.00 | Top 1% | Caucasian | 99.9% |
| 2012 | CA | 2130 | 4.00 | Top 1% | Hispanic | 99.0% |
| 2012 | FL | 2120 | 3.70 | Top 3% | Caucasian | 97.8% |
| 2012 | NY | 2090 | 3.40 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 95.3% |
| 2012 | FL | 2020 | 3.00 | Top 25% | Caucasian | 74.3% |
| 2012 | MD | 1990 | 2.40 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 69.8% |
| 2012 | MD | 1990 | 3.40 | Unknown | Caucasian | 96.6% |
| 2012 | MD | 1990 | 3.00 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 91.1% |
| 2012 | VA | 1950 | 3.07 | Unknown | Middle-Eastern | 67.8% |
| 2012 | MA | 1890 | 3.70 | Top 15% | Caucasian | 86.7% |
| 2012 | MD | 1820 | 2.38 | Unknown | East Asian | 35.5% |
| 2012 | VA | 1680 | 3.50 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 43.8% |
| 2012 | MD | 1560 | 3.85 | Class Not Ranked | East Asian | 74.8% |
| 2012 | XX | 1500 | 3.20 | Top 30% | Caucasian | 7.1% |
| 2012 | SC | 26 | 3.80 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 79.0% |
| 2011 | MD | 2400 | 3.86 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 100.0% |
| 2011 | VA | 2400 | 4.00 | Unknown | Caucasian | 99.9% |
| 2011 | MD | 2380 | 3.95 | Class Not Ranked | East Asian | 100.0% |
| 2011 | MD | 2350 | 4.00 | Unknown | East Asian | 100.0% |
| 2011 | MD | 2350 | 3.76 | Top 20% | East Asian | 99.9% |
| 2011 | MD | 2300 | 4.00 | Top 1% | East Asian | 99.9% |
| 2011 | MD | 2280 | 3.30 | Top 15% | African-American | 99.6% |
| 2011 | MD | 2270 | 3.97 | Top 1% | East Asian | 99.9% |
| 2011 | MD | 2260 | 3.80 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 99.9% |
| 2011 | FL | 2260 | 3.85 | Class Not Ranked | South Asian | 99.4% |
| 2011 | NC | 2260 | 3.34 | Unknown | Caucasian | 98.0% |
| 2011 | CT | 2260 | 3.65 | Top 15% | Caucasian | 99.1% |
| 2011 | NJ | 2260 | 3.70 | Top 15% | Middle-Eastern | 99.2% |
| 2011 | XX | 2250 | 3.75 | Top 10% | None Indicated | 99.3% |
| 2011 | MD | 2250 | 4.00 | Top 1% | South Asian | 99.9% |
| 2011 | FL | 2240 | 4.00 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 99.6% |
| 2011 | MD | 2230 | 3.60 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 99.7% |
| 2011 | MD | 2220 | 3.91 | Class Not Ranked | East Asian | 99.8% |
| 2011 | MD | 2200 | 4.00 | Top 4% | East Asian | 99.9% |
| 2011 | (Private) | 2200 | 3.43 | Top 25% | East Asian | 99.4% |
| 2011 | NJ | 2200 | 4.00 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 99.4% |
| 2011 | NJ | 2200 | 4.00 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 99.4% |
| 2011 | MD | 2190 | 3.90 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 99.8% |
| 2011 | OH | 2180 | 4.00 | Salutatorian | Caucasian | 99.4% |
| 2011 | MD | 2180 | 3.33 | Unknown | South Asian | 99.1% |
| 2011 | DC | 2160 | 3.67 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 98.1% |
| 2011 | NJ | 2150 | 3.70 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 98.2% |
| 2011 | IA | 2140 | 3.73 | Top 15% | Caucasian | 98.1% |
| 2011 | MD | 2120 | 3.53 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 99.1% |
| 2011 | NY | 2100 | 3.20 | Unknown | Hispanic | 90.6% |
| 2011 | PA | 2100 | 3.71 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 97.3% |
| 2011 | NJ | 2100 | 3.00 | Bottom 50% | Caucasian | 82.8% |
| 2011 | AZ | 2100 | 3.40 | Unknown | Caucasian | 94.1% |
| 2011 | MD | 2100 | 3.50 | Unknown | Hispanic | 98.9% |
| 2011 | MD | 2100 | 3.89 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 99.6% |
| 2011 | PA | 2100 | 3.90 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 98.4% |
| 2011 | MD | 2090 | 4.00 | Top 1% | Caucasian | 99.7% |
| 2011 | MD | 2090 | 3.86 | Top 15% | Caucasian | 99.5% |
| 2011 | NY | 2080 | 4.00 | Top 5% | Hispanic | 98.5% |
| 2011 | NJ | 2080 | 3.65 | Top 4% | Other | 96.5% |
| 2011 | MD | 2080 | 3.40 | Class Not Ranked | South Asian | 98.3% |
| 2011 | MD | 2070 | 4.00 | Top 10% | East Asian | 99.6% |
| 2011 | MD | 2060 | 3.70 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 99.1% |
| 2011 | NY | 2060 | 3.95 | Top 5% | African-American | 98.1% |
| 2011 | MD | 2050 | 3.53 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 98.5% |
| 2011 | MD | 2040 | 3.60 | Top 35% | Caucasian | 99.2% |
| 2011 | MD | 2040 | 3.67 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 98.9% |
| 2011 | MD | 2030 | 3.85 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 99.2% |
| 2011 | MD | 2030 | 3.85 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 99.2% |
| 2011 | MD | 2030 | 3.93 | Unknown | East Asian | 99.4% |
| 2011 | MD | 2020 | 3.14 | Top 25% | Caucasian | 94.6% |
| 2011 | CA | 2020 | 3.60 | Top 10% | East Asian | 93.5% |
| 2011 | MD | 2020 | 3.16 | Unknown | East Asian | 95.1% |
| 2011 | PA | 2020 | 3.20 | Top 25% | East Asian | 82.8% |
| 2011 | MD | 2020 | 3.76 | Top 15% | Caucasian | 98.9% |
| 2011 | VA | 2010 | 3.10 | Unknown | Caucasian | 85.5% |
| 2011 | MD | 2010 | 3.71 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 98.7% |
| 2011 | MD | 2010 | 3.91 | Top 15% | Caucasian | 99.2% |
| 2011 | MD | 2010 | 4.00 | Top 4% | Native American | 99.4% |
| 2011 | NJ | 2010 | 3.75 | Top 15% | Caucasian | 95.1% |
| 2011 | NJ | 1990 | 3.35 | Unknown | South Asian | 91.8% |
| 2011 | NY | 1990 | 3.05 | Class Not Ranked | Hispanic | 73.1% |
| 2011 | NJ | 1980 | 4.00 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 97.3% |
| 2011 | MD | 1980 | 2.75 | Top 25% | Caucasian | 82.6% |
| 2011 | CT | 1980 | 3.70 | Top 15% | Caucasian | 93.0% |
| 2011 | MD | 1970 | 3.61 | Top 10% | East Asian | 97.7% |
| 2011 | PA | 1960 | 3.40 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 84.0% |
| 2011 | MD | 1960 | 3.30 | Top 30% | Caucasian | 94.1% |
| 2011 | MD | 1950 | 3.90 | Top 15% | South Asian | 98.7% |
| 2011 | MD | 1950 | 3.00 | Unknown | African-American | 88.2% |
| 2011 | NY | 1950 | 3.52 | Unknown | Caucasian | 86.9% |
| 2011 | CA | 1950 | 3.30 | Class Not Ranked | South Asian | 79.1% |
| 2011 | CA | 1950 | 3.65 | Class Not Ranked | East Asian | 90.3% |
| 2011 | FL | 1950 | 2.70 | Unknown | Caucasian | 44.9% |
| 2011 | VA | 1950 | 3.65 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 90.0% |
| 2011 | MD | 1950 | 3.44 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 95.8% |
| 2011 | NJ | 1950 | 3.60 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 89.1% |
| 2011 | PA | 1940 | 3.80 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 92.5% |
| 2011 | PA | 1930 | 3.78 | Top 15% | Caucasian | 91.6% |
| 2011 | FL | 1920 | 3.30 | Top 30% | Hispanic | 90.1% |
| 2011 | NJ | 1920 | 3.60 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 86.5% |
| 2011 | MD | 1920 | 4.00 | Unknown | East Asian | 98.7% |
| 2011 | PA | 1900 | 3.40 | Top 40% | East Asian | 74.1% |
| 2011 | NJ | 1890 | 3.45 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 78.0% |
| 2011 | MA | 1870 | 3.50 | Top 25% | Caucasian | 75.9% |
| 2011 | TX | 1870 | 3.00 | Class Not Ranked | South Asian | 48.0% |
| 2011 | MD | 1870 | 3.55 | Unknown | East Asian | 94.1% |
| 2011 | MD | 1860 | 3.40 | Top 15% | Caucasian | 91.1% |
| 2011 | MD | 1860 | 3.88 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 97.2% |
| 2011 | MD | 1850 | 3.00 | Class Not Ranked | Other | 77.3% |
| 2011 | MD | 1850 | 3.00 | Unknown | East Asian | 77.3% |
| 2011 | MD | 1850 | 3.86 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 96.8% |
| 2011 | NY | 1840 | 3.50 | Unknown | Caucasian | 72.3% |
| 2011 | (Private) | 1810 | 3.75 | Top 4% | Caucasian | 94.6% |
| 2011 | PA | 1800 | 3.50 | Top 30% | Caucasian | 85.4% |
| 2011 | (Private) | 1800 | 3.60 | Top 30% | Caucasian | 88.3% |
| 2011 | NC | 1800 | 3.70 | Top 30% | Caucasian | 90.7% |
| 2011 | MD | 1800 | 3.97 | Top 5% | East Asian | 96.6% |
| 2011 | NJ | 1800 | 3.30 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 52.8% |
| 2011 | MD | 1800 | 3.40 | Unknown | South Asian | 86.3% |
| 2011 | NC | 1800 | 3.70 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 76.6% |
| 2011 | MD | 1790 | 3.50 | Top 25% | Caucasian | 87.8% |
| 2011 | NY | 1770 | 3.00 | Bottom 30% | Caucasian | 24.1% |
| 2011 | MA | 1740 | 3.20 | Top 30% | Caucasian | 33.8% |
| 2011 | VA | 1720 | 3.50 | Top 20% | African-American | 49.5% |
| 2011 | MD | 1710 | 3.10 | Top 35% | East Asian | 56.4% |
| 2011 | NJ | 1710 | 3.50 | Unknown | Caucasian | 48.4% |
| 2011 | MD | 1700 | 4.00 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 93.2% |
| 2011 | NJ | 1700 | 0.00 | Unknown | Caucasian | 0.0% |
| 2011 | GA | 1690 | 3.44 | Top 40% | Caucasian | 37.5% |
| 2011 | NC | 1690 | 3.88 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 67.2% |
| 2011 | FL | 1670 | 3.67 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 94.2% |
| 2011 | WA | 1660 | 3.50 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 38.5% |
| 2011 | MD | 1650 | 3.90 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 99.5% |
| 2011 | NJ | 1640 | 2.74 | Bottom 50% | Caucasian | 6.1% |
| 2011 | MD | 1570 | 3.14 | Bottom 50% | South Asian | 30.2% |
| 2011 | NJ | 1500 | 3.90 | Top 15% | Caucasian | 33.0% |
| 2011 | MD | 1480 | 3.73 | Top 15% | South Asian | 53.5% |
| 2011 | DE | 1450 | 4.00 | Top 15% | South Asian | 29.8% |
| 2011 | RI | 1450 | 3.07 | Unknown | Caucasian | 3.8% |
| 2011 | MD | 1430 | 2.85 | Class Not Ranked | African-American | 7.6% |
| 2011 | MD | 1250 | 3.70 | Top 15% | Caucasian | 96.1% |
| 2011 | MD | 33 | 3.70 | Top 20% | African-American | 99.7% |
| 2011 | NM | 33 | 3.67 | Top 20% | East Asian | 98.5% |
| 2011 | MA | 32 | 3.30 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 94.0% |
| 2011 | CA | 31 | 3.68 | Unknown | East Asian | 96.3% |
| 2011 | MD | 27 | 3.95 | Top 5% | None Indicated | 97.2% |
| 2010 | MD | 2400 | 4.00 | Top 5% | South Asian | 100.0% |
| 2010 | MD | 2390 | 3.86 | Top 5% | East Asian | 100.0% |
| 2010 | MD | 2380 | 4.00 | Top 5% | East Asian | 100.0% |
| 2010 | (Private) | 2380 | 3.86 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 99.8% |
| 2010 | MD | 2380 | 3.76 | Top 15% | Caucasian | 99.9% |
| 2010 | MD | 2380 | 3.95 | Top 15% | East Asian | 100.0% |
| 2010 | NJ | 2350 | 3.95 | Top 2% | Middle-Eastern | 99.8% |
| 2010 | NC | 2340 | 4.00 | Top 3% | East Asian | 99.8% |
| 2010 | MD | 2330 | 4.00 | Top 2% | East Asian | 100.0% |
| 2010 | WA | 2330 | 3.98 | Top 1% | Other | 99.8% |
| 2010 | NJ | 2320 | 3.97 | Top 1% | None Indicated | 99.8% |
| 2010 | MD | 2310 | 3.96 | Top 10% | East Asian | 99.9% |
| 2010 | VA | 2310 | 3.95 | Top 4% | Caucasian | 99.7% |
| 2010 | NJ | 2300 | 3.80 | Top 4% | Caucasian | 99.6% |
| 2010 | PA | 2300 | 3.93 | Top 5% | East Asian | 99.7% |
| 2010 | MD | 2300 | 4.00 | Top 1% | East Asian | 99.9% |
| 2010 | TX | 2300 | 3.78 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 99.5% |
| 2010 | MN | 2290 | 3.99 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 99.7% |
| 2010 | NJ | 2290 | 3.60 | Class Not Ranked | East Asian | 99.2% |
| 2010 | MD | 2290 | 3.56 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 99.8% |
| 2010 | NJ | 2280 | 3.68 | Class Not Ranked | East Asian | 99.3% |
| 2010 | MD | 2280 | 4.00 | Valedictorian | Caucasian | 99.9% |
| 2010 | MD | 2270 | 3.85 | Valedictorian | South Asian | 99.9% |
| 2010 | NJ | 2270 | 4.00 | Top 15% | Caucasian | 99.7% |
| 2010 | MD | 2270 | 3.81 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 99.9% |
| 2010 | MD | 2270 | 4.00 | Unknown | East Asian | 99.9% |
| 2010 | MD | 2260 | 4.00 | Top 2% | Caucasian | 99.9% |
| 2010 | MD | 2260 | 3.90 | Top 4% | East Asian | 99.9% |
| 2010 | MD | 2260 | 3.58 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 99.7% |
| 2010 | MD | 2260 | 3.79 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 99.9% |
| 2010 | NJ | 2260 | 3.64 | Unknown | Caucasian | 99.1% |
| 2010 | NJ | 2250 | 3.90 | Class Not Ranked | South Asian | 99.5% |
| 2010 | NJ | 2250 | 3.93 | Top 1% | Caucasian | 99.5% |
| 2010 | NJ | 2250 | 3.85 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 99.4% |
| 2010 | WA | 2250 | 3.91 | Valedictorian | Caucasian | 99.5% |
| 2010 | MD | 2250 | 3.50 | Class Not Ranked | African-American | 99.7% |
| 2010 | NJ | 2240 | 3.90 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 99.5% |
| 2010 | CT | 2240 | 3.20 | Top 20% | East Asian | 96.6% |
| 2010 | NJ | 2230 | 3.72 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 99.0% |
| 2010 | VA | 2230 | 3.96 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 99.5% |
| 2010 | CT | 2230 | 3.60 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 98.6% |
| 2010 | MD | 2230 | 3.89 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 99.9% |
| 2010 | VA | 2220 | 4.00 | Class Not Ranked | Hispanic | 99.5% |
| 2010 | MD | 2220 | 3.75 | Top 10% | South Asian | 99.8% |
| 2010 | MD | 2220 | 3.78 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 99.8% |
| 2010 | VA | 2220 | 3.65 | Top 10% | East Asian | 98.8% |
| 2010 | VA | 2220 | 3.05 | Bottom 40% | Caucasian | 93.1% |
| 2010 | MD | 2220 | 3.80 | Top 10% | African-American | 99.8% |
| 2010 | NY | 2210 | 3.50 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 98.1% |
| 2010 | MD | 2210 | 3.85 | Top 2% | Middle-Eastern | 99.8% |
| 2010 | MD | 2210 | 3.95 | Class Not Ranked | East Asian | 99.9% |
| 2010 | MD | 2200 | 2.86 | Top 40% | Caucasian | 97.1% |
| 2010 | NJ | 2200 | 3.96 | Valedictorian | Caucasian | 99.4% |
| 2010 | MD | 2200 | 3.58 | Top 10% | None Indicated | 99.6% |
| 2010 | NJ | 2190 | 3.80 | Top 3% | Caucasian | 99.0% |
| 2010 | MA | 2190 | 3.10 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 93.7% |
| 2010 | XX | 2190 | 4.00 | Top 10% | East Asian | 99.4% |
| 2010 | NY | 2190 | 3.66 | Top 10% | East Asian | 98.5% |
| 2010 | CT | 2180 | 3.97 | Top 1% | Caucasian | 99.3% |
| 2010 | NJ | 2180 | 3.95 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 99.2% |
| 2010 | VA | 2170 | 3.60 | Top 15% | South Asian | 98.2% |
| 2010 | NJ | 2170 | 3.50 | Top 25% | Caucasian | 97.2% |
| 2010 | MD | 2170 | 3.79 | Top 3% | Caucasian | 99.7% |
| 2010 | NJ | 2170 | 3.68 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 98.3% |
| 2010 | PA | 2170 | 3.68 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 98.4% |
| 2010 | MD | 2160 | 4.00 | Top 2% | Caucasian | 99.8% |
| 2010 | MD | 2160 | 3.50 | Top 20% | East Asian | 99.3% |
| 2010 | MD | 2150 | 3.63 | Class Not Ranked | East Asian | 99.5% |
| 2010 | MD | 2150 | 4.00 | Valedictorian | Caucasian | 99.8% |
| 2010 | NY | 2140 | 3.15 | Bottom 50% | East Asian | 93.5% |
| 2010 | VA | 2140 | 3.87 | Top 10% | Other | 98.7% |
| 2010 | MD | 2140 | 3.75 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 99.6% |
| 2010 | AZ | 2140 | 3.71 | Unknown | Caucasian | 98.0% |
| 2010 | NJ | 2140 | 3.40 | Unknown | South Asian | 95.6% |
| 2010 | MA | 2140 | 3.34 | Unknown | East Asian | 95.0% |
| 2010 | PA | 2130 | 3.90 | Top 10% | South Asian | 98.7% |
| 2010 | MA | 2130 | 3.92 | Top 3% | Caucasian | 98.8% |
| 2010 | NJ | 2120 | 3.96 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 99.6% |
| 2010 | MO | 2120 | 3.76 | Top 5% | None Indicated | 98.9% |
| 2010 | PA | 2120 | 3.94 | Top 2% | Caucasian | 98.8% |
| 2010 | NJ | 2120 | 3.45 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 95.6% |
| 2010 | NY | 2110 | 3.72 | Unknown | Caucasian | 97.9% |
| 2010 | PA | 2110 | 3.58 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 96.6% |
| 2010 | NJ | 2110 | 3.50 | Top 15% | Caucasian | 95.7% |
| 2010 | NJ | 2110 | 3.71 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 97.4% |
| 2010 | RI | 2110 | 3.50 | Unknown | Caucasian | 95.7% |
| 2010 | MD | 2110 | 3.95 | Top 1% | Caucasian | 99.7% |
| 2010 | AL | 2100 | 3.90 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 98.7% |
| 2010 | VA | 2100 | 3.30 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 92.9% |
| 2010 | NJ | 2100 | 3.18 | Unknown | South Asian | 90.2% |
| 2010 | PA | 2100 | 3.00 | Top 15% | South Asian | 85.3% |
| 2010 | PA | 2100 | 3.62 | Top 5% | East Asian | 96.7% |
| 2010 | MD | 2100 | 2.70 | Class Not Ranked | East Asian | 92.0% |
| 2010 | MA | 2100 | 3.42 | Top 20% | None Indicated | 94.3% |
| 2010 | PA | 2090 | 3.75 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 98.8% |
| 2010 | NJ | 2090 | 3.00 | Top 15% | Caucasian | 92.2% |
| 2010 | VA | 2090 | 3.30 | Unknown | Caucasian | 92.1% |
| 2010 | MD | 2090 | 3.60 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 99.1% |
| 2010 | NY | 2080 | 3.97 | Top 10% | African-American | 98.9% |
| 2010 | MD | 2080 | 3.40 | Unknown | Caucasian | 98.3% |
| 2010 | MD | 2070 | 3.50 | Top 15% | East Asian | 98.6% |
| 2010 | MD | 2070 | 3.38 | Top 25% | Caucasian | 98.0% |
| 2010 | XX | 2070 | 3.60 | Top 30% | East Asian | 95.1% |
| 2010 | CT | 2060 | 3.00 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 80.9% |
| 2010 | VA | 2060 | 3.20 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 87.6% |
| 2010 | NJ | 2060 | 3.50 | Bottom 50% | Caucasian | 92.7% |
| 2010 | MA | 2060 | 3.20 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 87.3% |
| 2010 | MA | 2050 | 3.65 | Top 15% | Caucasian | 96.0% |
| 2010 | NY | 2050 | 3.80 | Class Not Ranked | Hispanic | 96.8% |
| 2010 | NY | 2050 | 3.70 | Top 15% | Caucasian | 95.9% |
| 2010 | MA | 2050 | 3.00 | Top 25% | Caucasian | 78.6% |
| 2010 | NY | 2050 | 3.66 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 95.4% |
| 2010 | MA | 2050 | 3.60 | Top 15% | Caucasian | 94.7% |
| 2010 | MD | 2050 | 3.71 | Top 10% | East Asian | 99.0% |
| 2010 | NY | 2050 | 3.68 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 95.6% |
| 2010 | NJ | 2050 | 3.56 | Class Not Ranked | East Asian | 94.2% |
| 2010 | NJ | 2050 | 3.60 | Top 4% | Caucasian | 95.0% |
| 2010 | NJ | 2050 | 3.34 | Top 20% | Middle-Eastern | 90.0% |
| 2010 | NJ | 2050 | 3.60 | Top 15% | South Asian | 94.7% |
| 2010 | NJ | 2050 | 3.17 | Class Not Ranked | African-American | 85.6% |
| 2010 | MD | 2050 | 3.62 | Top 15% | Caucasian | 98.8% |
| 2010 | NJ | 2040 | 3.37 | Class Not Ranked | South Asian | 95.0% |
| 2010 | XX | 2040 | 3.30 | Class Not Ranked | East Asian | 88.5% |
| 2010 | MD | 2040 | 3.68 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 98.9% |
| 2010 | MA | 2040 | 3.71 | Top 4% | East Asian | 95.9% |
| 2010 | MD | 2040 | 3.73 | Top 25% | Caucasian | 98.9% |
| 2010 | MD | 2040 | 3.97 | Top 2% | Caucasian | 99.5% |
| 2010 | MD | 2040 | 3.76 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 99.0% |
| 2010 | MD | 2030 | 3.92 | Unknown | Caucasian | 99.7% |
| 2010 | MD | 2030 | 3.73 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 99.2% |
| 2010 | OH | 2030 | 3.50 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 92.3% |
| 2010 | NY | 2030 | 3.75 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 95.8% |
| 2010 | NJ | 2030 | 3.49 | Top 10% | South Asian | 92.3% |
| 2010 | XX | 2030 | 3.93 | Class Not Ranked | East Asian | 97.3% |
| 2010 | MD | 2030 | 3.71 | Top 25% | Caucasian | 98.8% |
| 2010 | NJ | 2030 | 3.67 | Class Not Ranked | African-American | 94.9% |
| 2010 | NJ | 2030 | 3.45 | Top 10% | South Asian | 91.6% |
| 2010 | PA | 2020 | 3.80 | Top 3% | Caucasian | 97.4% |
| 2010 | MD | 2020 | 3.80 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 99.4% |
| 2010 | GA | 2020 | 3.90 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 96.9% |
| 2010 | CT | 2020 | 3.80 | Top 15% | Caucasian | 95.9% |
| 2010 | MD | 2020 | 3.60 | Top 15% | Hispanic | 98.4% |
| 2010 | NJ | 2020 | 3.98 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 97.4% |
| 2010 | NJ | 2020 | 3.40 | Class Not Ranked | South Asian | 89.4% |
| 2010 | NH | 2010 | 2.96 | Top 40% | Caucasian | 69.2% |
| 2010 | NJ | 2010 | 3.65 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 94.0% |
| 2010 | NH | 2010 | 3.40 | Top 10% | South Asian | 89.0% |
| 2010 | NY | 2010 | 3.84 | Top 2% | Caucasian | 96.3% |
| 2010 | MA | 2010 | 3.46 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 90.2% |
| 2010 | MD | 2000 | 3.56 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 98.8% |
| 2010 | NJ | 2000 | 3.40 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 87.7% |
| 2010 | VA | 2000 | 3.70 | Class Not Ranked | East Asian | 94.0% |
| 2010 | (Private) | 2000 | 3.93 | Top 5% | East Asian | 96.8% |
| 2010 | CA | 2000 | 3.70 | Class Not Ranked | Other | 94.0% |
| 2010 | MD | 2000 | 3.75 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 98.8% |
| 2010 | NY | 2000 | 3.64 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 93.1% |
| 2010 | NY | 2000 | 3.90 | Top 20% | East Asian | 96.2% |
| 2010 | MD | 2000 | 3.59 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 98.0% |
| 2010 | MD | 1990 | 3.76 | Top 15% | South Asian | 98.6% |
| 2010 | MD | 1990 | 3.28 | Top 25% | East Asian | 95.2% |
| 2010 | MD | 1990 | 3.43 | Top 30% | Caucasian | 96.6% |
| 2010 | NJ | 1990 | 3.60 | Top 15% | Hispanic | 91.7% |
| 2010 | NJ | 1990 | 3.60 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 91.7% |
| 2010 | MD | 1980 | 2.96 | Unknown | Caucasian | 89.6% |
| 2010 | VA | 1980 | 3.79 | Unknown | South Asian | 94.4% |
| 2010 | MD | 1980 | 3.50 | Unknown | Caucasian | 97.2% |
| 2010 | MA | 1980 | 3.01 | Top 40% | Caucasian | 66.8% |
| 2010 | MD | 1980 | 3.77 | Class Not Ranked | Hispanic | 98.6% |
| 2010 | NJ | 1980 | 2.98 | Class Not Ranked | Hispanic | 67.9% |
| 2010 | (Private) | 1980 | 3.96 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 99.1% |
| 2010 | FL | 1980 | 3.80 | Top 1% | Hispanic | 94.9% |
| 2010 | OH | 1970 | 2.90 | Unknown | Caucasian | 61.6% |
| 2010 | PA | 1960 | 3.80 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 93.7% |
| 2010 | PA | 1960 | 3.75 | Top 15% | Caucasian | 92.8% |
| 2010 | MD | 1960 | 3.95 | Salutatorian | Caucasian | 99.0% |
| 2010 | CA | 1950 | 3.94 | Top 3% | Caucasian | 98.9% |
| 2010 | MD | 1950 | 3.88 | Top 10% | South Asian | 99.5% |
| 2010 | NC | 1950 | 4.00 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 95.8% |
| 2010 | NJ | 1950 | 3.33 | Top 25% | Caucasian | 79.5% |
| 2010 | DE | 1950 | 3.20 | Top 30% | Caucasian | 73.1% |
| 2010 | NY | 1940 | 3.84 | Top 15% | Caucasian | 96.0% |
| 2010 | VA | 1940 | 3.60 | Class Not Ranked | East Asian | 89.1% |
| 2010 | VA | 1940 | 3.87 | Top 35% | South Asian | 93.2% |
| 2010 | XX | 1940 | 3.60 | Top 10% | East Asian | 88.6% |
| 2010 | NY | 1940 | 3.70 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 90.5% |
| 2010 | NY | 1940 | 3.30 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 77.9% |
| 2010 | NY | 1940 | 3.76 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 92.0% |
| 2010 | NY | 1930 | 3.50 | Unknown | South Asian | 98.7% |
| 2010 | CO | 1930 | 3.30 | Top 25% | Caucasian | 85.3% |
| 2010 | GA | 1930 | 3.40 | Top 40% | Caucasian | 78.4% |
| 2010 | NJ | 1930 | 3.80 | Top 15% | Caucasian | 92.0% |
| 2010 | CT | 1930 | 3.50 | Top 25% | Caucasian | 83.5% |
| 2010 | NJ | 1930 | 3.46 | Class Not Ranked | East Asian | 82.8% |
| 2010 | NY | 1920 | 3.70 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 94.6% |
| 2010 | CT | 1920 | 3.58 | Unknown | Caucasian | 92.6% |
| 2010 | MD | 1920 | 4.00 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 98.7% |
| 2010 | PA | 1920 | 3.25 | Top 25% | Caucasian | 71.4% |
| 2010 | XX | 1920 | 3.30 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 74.9% |
| 2010 | MD | 1920 | 3.38 | Top 25% | Caucasian | 93.7% |
| 2010 | NY | 1920 | 3.69 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 88.7% |
| 2010 | NY | 1910 | 3.65 | Top 30% | Caucasian | 86.3% |
| 2010 | WA | 1910 | 3.78 | Top 15% | Caucasian | 90.5% |
| 2010 | NY | 1910 | 3.80 | Top 5% | Middle-Eastern | 91.3% |
| 2010 | RI | 1910 | 3.50 | Top 25% | Caucasian | 81.5% |
| 2010 | MD | 1910 | 3.70 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 97.1% |
| 2010 | VA | 1910 | 3.85 | Top 20% | Hispanic | 91.7% |
| 2010 | XX | 1910 | 3.70 | Top 20% | South Asian | 88.3% |
| 2010 | NJ | 1910 | 3.37 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 76.4% |
| 2010 | NJ | 1900 | 3.90 | Unknown | Caucasian | 94.6% |
| 2010 | MD | 1900 | 3.20 | Top 40% | African-American | 88.0% |
| 2010 | RI | 1900 | 3.37 | Top 20% | South Asian | 74.6% |
| 2010 | DE | 1900 | 3.85 | Top 3% | Caucasian | 91.6% |
| 2010 | NY | 1900 | 3.70 | Top 10% | Other | 87.8% |
| 2010 | PA | 1900 | 3.90 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 92.3% |
| 2010 | NJ | 1890 | 3.29 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 85.6% |
| 2010 | MD | 1890 | 4.00 | Top 1% | Caucasian | 98.5% |
| 2010 | CT | 1890 | 3.35 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 72.2% |
| 2010 | MD | 1890 | 3.65 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 96.2% |
| 2010 | XX | 1890 | 4.00 | Top 5% | East Asian | 93.7% |
| 2010 | MD | 1890 | 3.95 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 98.1% |
| 2010 | MD | 1890 | 3.75 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 96.9% |
| 2010 | MD | 1890 | 3.30 | Unknown | East Asian | 90.9% |
| 2010 | VA | 1880 | 3.85 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 97.5% |
| 2010 | MD | 1880 | 3.65 | Class Not Ranked | Middle-Eastern | 95.8% |
| 2010 | MD | 1880 | 3.71 | Top 3% | Caucasian | 96.6% |
| 2010 | MA | 1880 | 3.83 | Top 10% | Hispanic | 89.7% |
| 2010 | NY | 1880 | 3.58 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 81.7% |
| 2010 | NY | 1870 | 3.70 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 96.6% |
| 2010 | VA | 1870 | 2.66 | Class Not Ranked | South Asian | 42.4% |
| 2010 | IL | 1870 | 3.45 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 84.4% |
| 2010 | DE | 1870 | 3.30 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 66.5% |
| 2010 | CT | 1860 | 3.40 | Top 15% | East Asian | 75.2% |
| 2010 | MD | 1860 | 3.47 | Top 25% | Caucasian | 92.0% |
| 2010 | PA | 1860 | 3.71 | Top 1% | Caucasian | 85.0% |
| 2010 | MD | 1860 | 2.90 | Top 5% | African-American | 74.9% |
| 2010 | MD | 1860 | 3.60 | Class Not Ranked | Middle-Eastern | 94.4% |
| 2010 | MD | 1860 | 3.42 | Top 40% | Caucasian | 90.4% |
| 2010 | CA | 1850 | 3.44 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 95.8% |
| 2010 | MD | 1850 | 2.30 | Unknown | African-American | 66.8% |
| 2010 | MD | 1850 | 3.87 | Top 10% | South Asian | 97.0% |
| 2010 | CT | 1850 | 3.60 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 78.8% |
| 2010 | NJ | 1840 | 3.30 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 85.9% |
| 2010 | PA | 1840 | 3.84 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 86.5% |
| 2010 | PA | 1840 | 3.64 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 79.3% |
| 2010 | MD | 1840 | 3.37 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 88.9% |
| 2010 | NY | 1840 | 3.02 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 43.4% |
| 2010 | PA | 1840 | 3.91 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 88.7% |
| 2010 | MD | 1830 | 3.55 | Top 25% | Caucasian | 91.8% |
| 2010 | PA | 1830 | 3.10 | Top 25% | Caucasian | 45.4% |
| 2010 | PA | 1830 | 3.20 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 53.0% |
| 2010 | TX | 1830 | 3.30 | Top 30% | South Asian | 57.5% |
| 2010 | PA | 1830 | 3.80 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 83.6% |
| 2010 | MD | 1830 | 3.90 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 96.7% |
| 2010 | NJ | 1820 | 3.75 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 81.1% |
| 2010 | TX | 1820 | 3.60 | Bottom 50% | Caucasian | 71.0% |
| 2010 | NJ | 1800 | 3.30 | Top 30% | Caucasian | 57.5% |
| 2010 | NJ | 1800 | 3.51 | Top 25% | None Indicated | 65.1% |
| 2010 | NY | 1800 | 3.60 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 70.7% |
| 2010 | (Private) | 1800 | 3.76 | Class Not Ranked | East Asian | 94.1% |
| 2010 | NJ | 1800 | 3.40 | Top 30% | Caucasian | 57.9% |
| 2010 | RI | 1800 | 3.75 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 79.3% |
| 2010 | NJ | 1800 | 3.60 | Top 10% | Other | 71.8% |
| 2010 | RI | 1800 | 3.50 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 65.7% |
| 2010 | VA | 1790 | 3.40 | Unknown | South Asian | 58.0% |
| 2010 | MD | 1790 | 3.10 | Class Not Ranked | East Asian | 73.2% |
| 2010 | NJ | 1790 | 3.52 | Class Not Ranked | South Asian | 65.3% |
| 2010 | XX | 1790 | 3.70 | Class Not Ranked | East Asian | 74.9% |
| 2010 | MD | 1790 | 3.50 | Top 20% | African-American | 88.1% |
| 2010 | PA | 1790 | 3.60 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 69.2% |
| 2010 | MA | 1790 | 3.23 | Top 35% | Caucasian | 44.7% |
| 2010 | (Private) | 1790 | 3.00 | Bottom 40% | Caucasian | 28.3% |
| 2010 | CA | 1790 | 3.76 | Top 10% | African-American | 78.1% |
| 2010 | MA | 1780 | 3.82 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 93.6% |
| 2010 | MD | 1780 | 3.41 | Top 30% | Caucasian | 88.4% |
| 2010 | MD | 1780 | 3.25 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 78.5% |
| 2010 | NJ | 1780 | 3.49 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 61.3% |
| 2010 | MD | 1770 | 3.31 | Unknown | Other | 91.1% |
| 2010 | MD | 1770 | 3.30 | Top 25% | Caucasian | 78.6% |
| 2010 | MD | 1770 | 3.89 | Top 10% | None Indicated | 94.7% |
| 2010 | XX | 1770 | 3.80 | Top 5% | South Asian | 77.4% |
| 2010 | VA | 1760 | 3.30 | Unknown | East Asian | 45.8% |
| 2010 | XX | 1760 | 3.60 | Top 20% | East Asian | 63.9% |
| 2010 | NJ | 1750 | 3.50 | Top 25% | Caucasian | 61.8% |
| 2010 | NJ | 1750 | 3.10 | Class Not Ranked | South Asian | 31.5% |
| 2010 | WA | 1750 | 3.71 | Top 25% | South Asian | 67.5% |
| 2010 | MD | 1750 | 3.41 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 81.2% |
| 2010 | FL | 1740 | 3.60 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 69.8% |
| 2010 | CA | 1740 | 3.30 | Bottom 50% | African-American | 46.0% |
| 2010 | NC | 1740 | 2.90 | Top 30% | African-American | 19.2% |
| 2010 | (Private) | 1730 | 2.90 | Top 40% | Caucasian | 17.4% |
| 2010 | NJ | 1730 | 3.20 | Top 25% | Other | 32.8% |
| 2010 | NJ | 1720 | 3.60 | Class Not Ranked | None Indicated | 56.5% |
| 2010 | MD | 1720 | 3.00 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 54.4% |
| 2010 | MD | 1720 | 2.76 | Bottom 50% | African-American | 35.1% |
| 2010 | MD | 1720 | 4.00 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 94.1% |
| 2010 | MD | 1710 | 3.46 | Top 30% | Caucasian | 77.0% |
| 2010 | XX | 1710 | 2.80 | Class Not Ranked | South Asian | 13.5% |
| 2010 | PA | 1710 | 3.50 | Unknown | Caucasian | 48.4% |
| 2010 | MD | 1700 | 3.20 | Class Not Ranked | East Asian | 63.3% |
| 2010 | PA | 1700 | 3.01 | Bottom 50% | South Asian | 17.2% |
| 2010 | MD | 1690 | 4.00 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 92.6% |
| 2010 | DE | 1690 | 3.70 | Top 10% | South Asian | 57.6% |
| 2010 | NJ | 1690 | 3.60 | Top 5% | East Asian | 51.9% |
| 2010 | MD | 1680 | 3.66 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 82.6% |
| 2010 | NJ | 1680 | 3.68 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 53.3% |
| 2010 | NJ | 1680 | 3.65 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 51.4% |
| 2010 | FL | 1670 | 3.33 | Unknown | Caucasian | 30.8% |
| 2010 | MD | 1660 | 2.95 | Top 25% | Caucasian | 38.3% |
| 2010 | MD | 1660 | 3.59 | Top 15% | Caucasian | 77.0% |
| 2010 | PA | 1660 | 3.60 | Top 35% | Caucasian | 42.2% |
| 2010 | NY | 1660 | 3.70 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 51.1% |
| 2010 | MD | 1650 | 3.45 | Unknown | Caucasian | 71.1% |
| 2010 | VA | 1650 | 3.25 | Bottom 50% | African-American | 20.4% |
| 2010 | NJ | 1650 | 3.30 | Top 35% | Caucasian | 24.0% |
| 2010 | CA | 1650 | 2.97 | Unknown | Hispanic | 13.1% |
| 2010 | MI | 1640 | 3.74 | Unknown | Caucasian | 87.9% |
| 2010 | PA | 1640 | 3.88 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 60.1% |
| 2010 | MD | 1640 | 3.60 | Top 30% | African-American | 73.4% |
| 2010 | MD | 1640 | 3.32 | Top 10% | South Asian | 59.9% |
| 2010 | MD | 1620 | 3.20 | Bottom 50% | Caucasian | 43.1% |
| 2010 | MD | 1620 | 3.30 | Bottom 50% | East Asian | 49.5% |
| 2010 | FL | 1610 | 3.86 | Valedictorian | African-American | 64.0% |
| 2010 | PA | 1600 | 3.40 | Top 15% | Caucasian | 23.1% |
| 2010 | PA | 1600 | 3.85 | Top 30% | Caucasian | 46.8% |
| 2010 | MD | 1590 | 3.16 | Top 30% | Caucasian | 63.6% |
| 2010 | MD | 1590 | 3.60 | Top 30% | Caucasian | 64.8% |
| 2010 | XX | 1590 | 3.50 | Class Not Ranked | None Indicated | 26.6% |
| 2010 | VA | 1570 | 3.62 | Class Not Ranked | African-American | 29.4% |
| 2010 | NJ | 1550 | 3.53 | Top 30% | Hispanic | 21.0% |
| 2010 | MD | 1530 | 3.02 | Top 40% | African-American | 53.7% |
| 2010 | NY | 1520 | 3.67 | Top 10% | Hispanic | 24.9% |
| 2010 | NJ | 1510 | 3.30 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 10.2% |
| 2010 | PA | 1510 | 3.10 | Top 40% | Caucasian | 5.7% |
| 2010 | MD | 1500 | 2.96 | Unknown | Caucasian | 41.3% |
| 2010 | NY | 1500 | 2.90 | Bottom 50% | Caucasian | 4.4% |
| 2010 | FL | 1500 | 3.45 | Bottom 50% | Hispanic | 11.5% |
| 2010 | XX | 1500 | 3.25 | Bottom 50% | East Asian | 7.2% |
| 2010 | NJ | 1480 | 3.70 | Top 25% | African-American | 19.2% |
| 2010 | (Private) | 1470 | 3.50 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 12.0% |
| 2010 | PA | 1410 | 3.40 | Top 30% | Caucasian | 5.8% |
| 2010 | MD | 1410 | 2.89 | Class Not Ranked | Hispanic | 7.2% |
| 2010 | MD | 1400 | 3.45 | Top 25% | Caucasian | 22.3% |
| 2010 | MD | 1360 | 3.70 | Class Not Ranked | East Asian | 74.3% |
| 2010 | MD | 1340 | 3.14 | Top 25% | Caucasian | 7.5% |
| 2010 | NY | 1270 | 3.00 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 55.1% |
| 2010 | NJ | 1220 | 3.13 | Class Not Ranked | Hispanic | 48.6% |
| 2010 | MD | 1220 | 3.30 | Top 40% | Caucasian | 84.5% |
| 2010 | MD | 1220 | 3.20 | Class Not Ranked | African-American | 82.8% |
| 2010 | PA | 1060 | 3.50 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 26.1% |
| 2010 | VA | 35 | 3.92 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 99.8% |
| 2010 | MD | 34 | 3.50 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 99.7% |
| 2010 | NY | 34 | 3.85 | Top 5% | African-American | 99.5% |
| 2010 | MD | 34 | 3.76 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 99.9% |
| 2010 | OK | 33 | 3.75 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 98.8% |
| 2010 | OK | 33 | 3.80 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 98.9% |
| 2010 | OH | 33 | 3.70 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 98.6% |
| 2010 | MA | 32 | 3.31 | Top 30% | Caucasian | 93.8% |
| 2010 | (Private) | 32 | 3.20 | Class Not Ranked | None Indicated | 92.4% |
| 2010 | NJ | 32 | 3.71 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 97.9% |
| 2010 | MD | 32 | 3.80 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 99.6% |
| 2010 | XX | 32 | 3.44 | Class Not Ranked | South Asian | 95.8% |
| 2010 | MN | 32 | 3.96 | Top 1% | East Asian | 98.9% |
| 2010 | IL | 31 | 3.65 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 96.0% |
| 2010 | NY | 31 | 3.64 | Unknown | Caucasian | 95.9% |
| 2010 | NJ | 31 | 4.00 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 98.4% |
| 2010 | IL | 31 | 3.30 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 90.5% |
| 2010 | AL | 31 | 4.00 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 98.4% |
| 2010 | KS | 31 | 3.86 | Top 15% | Caucasian | 97.6% |
| 2010 | NY | 30 | 3.76 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 95.2% |
| 2010 | CA | 30 | 3.83 | Top 10% | Other | 96.0% |
| 2010 | MD | 30 | 3.06 | Unknown | East Asian | 93.4% |
| 2010 | NY | 30 | 3.84 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 96.0% |
| 2010 | MO | 30 | 3.83 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 96.1% |
| 2010 | CO | 29 | 3.77 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 92.8% |
| 2010 | NJ | 29 | 3.30 | Bottom 50% | Caucasian | 76.0% |
| 2010 | NJ | 29 | 3.95 | Unknown | Caucasian | 95.2% |
| 2010 | NY | 28 | 2.95 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 49.0% |
| 2010 | MI | 28 | 3.90 | Top 5% | Middle-Eastern | 92.0% |
| 2010 | IL | 28 | 3.65 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 85.5% |
| 2010 | MD | 27 | 3.10 | Top 30% | Caucasian | 77.5% |
| 2010 | MD | 27 | 3.35 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 87.6% |
| 2010 | NY | 27 | 3.50 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 70.3% |
| 2010 | MD | 26 | 2.49 | Bottom 30% | South Asian | 29.2% |
| 2010 | XX | 25 | 3.72 | Top 3% | East Asian | 66.4% |
| 2010 | MD | 25 | 2.92 | Top 30% | African-American | 48.6% |
| 2010 | NJ | 25 | 3.40 | Unknown | South Asian | 45.0% |
| 2010 | MN | 23 | 2.81 | Unknown | South Asian | 6.5% |
| 2010 | OH | 18 | 1.60 | Unknown | African-American | 0.0% |
| 2009 | MD | 2400 | 3.40 | Unknown | African-American | 99.9% |
| 2009 | MD | 2330 | 4.00 | Top 5% | South Asian | 100.0% |
| 2009 | NY | 2330 | 4.00 | Salutatorian | Caucasian | 99.8% |
| 2009 | SD | 2310 | 4.00 | Valedictorian | South Asian | 99.8% |
| 2009 | MD | 2310 | 4.00 | Unknown | East Asian | 99.9% |
| 2009 | MD | 2310 | 3.80 | Unknown | None Indicated | 99.9% |
| 2009 | VA | 2300 | 3.80 | Class Not Ranked | South Asian | 99.5% |
| 2009 | MD | 2290 | 3.84 | Top 10% | East Asian | 99.9% |
| 2009 | VA | 2290 | 3.60 | Top 10% | South Asian | 99.2% |
| 2009 | VA | 2260 | 3.50 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 98.7% |
| 2009 | TX | 2260 | 3.85 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 99.4% |
| 2009 | MD | 2250 | 3.90 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 99.9% |
| 2009 | PA | 2250 | 3.57 | Top 5% | South Asian | 98.9% |
| 2009 | DE | 2230 | 3.80 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 99.2% |
| 2009 | MA | 2210 | 3.68 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 98.8% |
| 2009 | MD | 2210 | 3.90 | Top 5% | East Asian | 99.8% |
| 2009 | MD | 2200 | 3.81 | Top 10% | Other | 99.8% |
| 2009 | MD | 2190 | 4.00 | Salutatorian | East Asian | 99.9% |
| 2009 | MD | 2180 | 3.85 | Valedictorian | Caucasian | 99.8% |
| 2009 | MD | 2180 | 3.95 | Top 5% | African-American | 99.8% |
| 2009 | MD | 2180 | 3.75 | Top 1% | Caucasian | 99.7% |
| 2009 | NY | 2180 | 3.40 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 96.8% |
| 2009 | DE | 2170 | 3.50 | Top 5% | East Asian | 97.4% |
| 2009 | MD | 2170 | 3.63 | Top 20% | East Asian | 99.5% |
| 2009 | MD | 2170 | 4.00 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 99.8% |
| 2009 | MA | 2160 | 3.85 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 98.9% |
| 2009 | PA | 2160 | 3.90 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 99.0% |
| 2009 | MD | 2150 | 3.76 | Top 10% | East Asian | 99.6% |
| 2009 | (Private) | 2150 | 3.90 | Unknown | None Indicated | 98.9% |
| 2009 | VA | 2150 | 3.45 | Class Not Ranked | South Asian | 96.5% |
| 2009 | NJ | 2140 | 3.80 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 98.4% |
| 2009 | MD | 2140 | 4.00 | Top 1% | Middle-Eastern | 99.8% |
| 2009 | CA | 2120 | 3.55 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 97.9% |
| 2009 | PA | 2110 | 3.78 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 98.0% |
| 2009 | MD | 2100 | 3.93 | Top 5% | South Asian | 99.6% |
| 2009 | NY | 2100 | 4.00 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 98.7% |
| 2009 | MD | 2100 | 3.60 | Top 10% | None Indicated | 99.2% |
| 2009 | MD | 2100 | 3.86 | Top 10% | Hispanic | 99.6% |
| 2009 | NY | 2100 | 3.80 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 97.9% |
| 2009 | MD | 2090 | 3.20 | Top 30% | East Asian | 97.3% |
| 2009 | MD | 2070 | 3.85 | Top 5% | None Indicated | 99.4% |
| 2009 | NJ | 2070 | 3.48 | Unknown | Other | 94.0% |
| 2009 | MD | 2070 | 3.80 | Unknown | East Asian | 99.3% |
| 2009 | PA | 2060 | 2.70 | Bottom 40% | Caucasian | 61.0% |
| 2009 | PA | 2060 | 3.90 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 97.8% |
| 2009 | CA | 2060 | 3.75 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 96.7% |
| 2009 | MD | 2050 | 3.65 | Class Not Ranked | East Asian | 98.9% |
| 2009 | (Private) | 2050 | 3.50 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 93.3% |
| 2009 | VA | 2050 | 3.54 | Top 10% | East Asian | 94.0% |
| 2009 | MD | 2040 | 3.70 | Class Not Ranked | Hispanic | 98.9% |
| 2009 | (Private) | 2040 | 3.80 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 99.2% |
| 2009 | PA | 2040 | 3.60 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 94.5% |
| 2009 | MD | 2030 | 4.00 | Top 1% | Hispanic | 99.5% |
| 2009 | NJ | 2030 | 3.79 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 96.3% |
| 2009 | NJ | 2030 | 3.89 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 96.9% |
| 2009 | CT | 2030 | 3.80 | Top 20% | None Indicated | 96.2% |
| 2009 | NY | 2020 | 3.70 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 94.7% |
| 2009 | NY | 2020 | 4.00 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 97.6% |
| 2009 | NJ | 2020 | 3.54 | Top 5% | South Asian | 92.7% |
| 2009 | NJ | 2020 | 3.75 | Unknown | Caucasian | 95.4% |
| 2009 | VA | 2020 | 2.99 | Unknown | East Asian | 74.8% |
| 2009 | MA | 2020 | 3.60 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 93.5% |
| 2009 | VA | 2010 | 3.50 | Unknown | East Asian | 91.0% |
| 2009 | MA | 2000 | 3.53 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 91.4% |
| 2009 | CA | 2000 | 3.10 | Unknown | Caucasian | 77.3% |
| 2009 | (Private) | 2000 | 3.40 | Bottom 50% | Middle-Eastern | 86.0% |
| 2009 | MD | 2000 | 3.40 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 96.8% |
| 2009 | VA | 2000 | 3.82 | Top 20% | Middle-Eastern | 95.4% |
| 2009 | MD | 1990 | 3.98 | Class Not Ranked | East Asian | 99.2% |
| 2009 | NJ | 1990 | 3.67 | Top 20% | East Asian | 92.8% |
| 2009 | MD | 1980 | 3.38 | Unknown | East Asian | 98.1% |
| 2009 | CA | 1980 | 3.75 | Top 10% | Other | 97.0% |
| 2009 | PA | 1980 | 3.71 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 93.4% |
| 2009 | NY | 1980 | 3.30 | Class Not Ranked | Hispanic | 82.8% |
| 2009 | CT | 1980 | 3.40 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 85.8% |
| 2009 | PA | 1980 | 3.83 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 95.1% |
| 2009 | NY | 1970 | 3.10 | Class Not Ranked | Middle-Eastern | 72.8% |
| 2009 | PA | 1970 | 3.70 | Top 40% | Caucasian | 91.6% |
| 2009 | NY | 1970 | 3.15 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 75.3% |
| 2009 | VA | 1970 | 4.00 | Top 5% | East Asian | 96.6% |
| 2009 | MA | 1960 | 3.60 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 92.7% |
| 2009 | MD | 1960 | 3.79 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 98.4% |
| 2009 | XX | 1950 | 3.80 | Class Not Ranked | South Asian | 93.1% |
| 2009 | DE | 1950 | 3.50 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 86.0% |
| 2009 | MD | 1950 | 3.50 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 96.4% |
| 2009 | MD | 1940 | 3.15 | Bottom 50% | Caucasian | 89.5% |
| 2009 | CA | 1940 | 3.71 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 91.2% |
| 2009 | MD | 1940 | 3.48 | Unknown | South Asian | 96.0% |
| 2009 | IL | 1930 | 3.85 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 97.6% |
| 2009 | MD | 1930 | 3.95 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 99.3% |
| 2009 | VA | 1930 | 3.00 | Unknown | East Asian | 59.8% |
| 2009 | MA | 1930 | 3.82 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 92.7% |
| 2009 | NJ | 1920 | 3.83 | Class Not Ranked | Hispanic | 98.4% |
| 2009 | FL | 1920 | 3.88 | Top 5% | Hispanic | 93.3% |
| 2009 | MD | 1920 | 4.00 | Top 1% | Caucasian | 98.8% |
| 2009 | NJ | 1920 | 3.70 | Class Not Ranked | East Asian | 89.2% |
| 2009 | NY | 1920 | 4.00 | Valedictorian | Caucasian | 95.1% |
| 2009 | VA | 1920 | 3.67 | Top 10% | East Asian | 88.7% |
| 2009 | (Private) | 1920 | 3.70 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 89.5% |
| 2009 | MD | 1910 | 3.77 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 99.7% |
| 2009 | MD | 1910 | 4.00 | Top 1% | Caucasian | 98.7% |
| 2009 | MA | 1910 | 3.40 | Class Not Ranked | Hispanic | 78.2% |
| 2009 | NY | 1900 | 3.70 | Unknown | Caucasian | 97.8% |
| 2009 | NY | 1900 | 3.60 | Unknown | Caucasian | 84.5% |
| 2009 | CT | 1900 | 3.25 | Unknown | Caucasian | 68.9% |
| 2009 | VA | 1900 | 3.26 | Top 20% | African-American | 68.9% |
| 2009 | CA | 1890 | 3.37 | Top 20% | South Asian | 73.3% |
| 2009 | MD | 1880 | 3.00 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 80.8% |
| 2009 | MD | 1880 | 3.60 | Top 20% | African-American | 95.1% |
| 2009 | NY | 1880 | 3.33 | Unknown | Caucasian | 70.3% |
| 2009 | WA | 1870 | 2.90 | Bottom 50% | Caucasian | 74.7% |
| 2009 | MD | 1870 | 3.71 | Top 30% | None Indicated | 97.7% |
| 2009 | CA | 1870 | 3.50 | Bottom 50% | Hispanic | 73.5% |
| 2009 | NC | 1860 | 3.80 | Top 30% | Caucasian | 86.0% |
| 2009 | DE | 1860 | 3.90 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 90.0% |
| 2009 | NJ | 1860 | 3.40 | Class Not Ranked | South Asian | 70.5% |
| 2009 | MA | 1860 | 3.45 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 73.6% |
| 2009 | MA | 1850 | 3.35 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 80.7% |
| 2009 | PA | 1850 | 3.60 | Top 15% | Caucasian | 78.8% |
| 2009 | NY | 1850 | 3.47 | Class Not Ranked | East Asian | 72.7% |
| 2009 | MD | 1850 | 3.76 | Unknown | Caucasian | 96.0% |
| 2009 | MD | 1850 | 3.50 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 92.4% |
| 2009 | MD | 1840 | 3.50 | Top 20% | African-American | 91.6% |
| 2009 | MD | 1830 | 3.50 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 91.0% |
| 2009 | MD | 1830 | 3.54 | Top 20% | Hispanic | 91.8% |
| 2009 | RI | 1820 | 3.70 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 79.1% |
| 2009 | DE | 1820 | 3.97 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 88.8% |
| 2009 | (Private) | 1810 | 3.75 | Top 20% | South Asian | 79.2% |
| 2009 | MD | 1810 | 3.40 | Top 30% | African-American | 86.3% |
| 2009 | NJ | 1810 | 3.88 | Top 10% | None Indicated | 84.8% |
| 2009 | NJ | 1800 | 4.00 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 87.9% |
| 2009 | NC | 1800 | 3.66 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 73.8% |
| 2009 | CA | 1800 | 3.21 | Class Not Ranked | South Asian | 47.7% |
| 2009 | PA | 1800 | 3.50 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 65.1% |
| 2009 | MA | 1790 | 3.60 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 69.7% |
| 2009 | NJ | 1790 | 3.30 | Top 40% | Caucasian | 48.5% |
| 2009 | MA | 1780 | 3.40 | Top 30% | Caucasian | 53.8% |
| 2009 | MA | 1780 | 3.30 | Top 30% | Caucasian | 47.4% |
| 2009 | MA | 1780 | 3.50 | Top 40% | Caucasian | 58.8% |
| 2009 | MA | 1780 | 3.50 | Top 40% | Caucasian | 58.8% |
| 2009 | NY | 1780 | 3.70 | Unknown | Caucasian | 73.0% |
| 2009 | MD | 1780 | 3.80 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 93.9% |
| 2009 | VA | 1780 | 3.20 | Unknown | Caucasian | 43.0% |
| 2009 | MA | 1770 | 2.03 | Top 30% | African-American | 3.2% |
| 2009 | MD | 1770 | 3.25 | Bottom 50% | East Asian | 73.9% |
| 2009 | FL | 1760 | 3.60 | Top 30% | African-American | 62.7% |
| 2009 | VA | 1760 | 3.36 | Unknown | None Indicated | 49.6% |
| 2009 | MD | 1760 | 3.25 | Bottom 50% | East Asian | 72.5% |
| 2009 | NJ | 1760 | 3.69 | Top 10% | South Asian | 70.1% |
| 2009 | MD | 1740 | 3.40 | Class Not Ranked | East Asian | 79.7% |
| 2009 | VA | 1740 | 3.60 | Top 20% | East Asian | 60.0% |
| 2009 | XX | 1720 | 3.70 | Top 5% | Other | 63.9% |
| 2009 | MD | 1720 | 3.83 | Top 10% | African-American | 91.1% |
| 2009 | NJ | 1720 | 3.50 | Unknown | Caucasian | 50.2% |
| 2009 | MD | 1690 | 4.00 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 96.2% |
| 2009 | MD | 1690 | 2.90 | Bottom 20% | Caucasian | 34.3% |
| 2009 | PA | 1690 | 3.30 | Top 40% | Caucasian | 29.5% |
| 2009 | MD | 1680 | 3.43 | Top 40% | Caucasian | 69.8% |
| 2009 | CA | 1670 | 3.60 | Top 20% | East Asian | 92.7% |
| 2009 | MD | 1670 | 3.02 | Bottom 50% | African-American | 41.8% |
| 2009 | MD | 1670 | 3.20 | Class Not Ranked | African-American | 57.6% |
| 2009 | NJ | 1670 | 3.50 | Top 20% | South Asian | 40.1% |
| 2009 | MA | 1650 | 3.80 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 55.0% |
| 2009 | (Private) | 1640 | 3.30 | Top 30% | East Asian | 56.2% |
| 2009 | NJ | 1630 | 3.55 | Top 20% | South Asian | 42.1% |
| 2009 | NJ | 1630 | 3.10 | Class Not Ranked | East Asian | 15.1% |
| 2009 | MD | 1620 | 3.63 | Unknown | Hispanic | 73.2% |
| 2009 | XX | 1620 | 3.85 | Top 20% | East Asian | 52.3% |
| 2009 | MD | 1610 | 3.20 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 45.2% |
| 2009 | MA | 1610 | 3.60 | Top 30% | Caucasian | 33.8% |
| 2009 | RI | 1580 | 2.00 | Bottom 0% | Caucasian | 0.5% |
| 2009 | NJ | 1580 | 3.46 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 23.3% |
| 2009 | NY | 1570 | 3.60 | Top 40% | Caucasian | 25.8% |
| 2009 | SC | 1560 | 3.65 | Top 20% | East Asian | 29.0% |
| 2009 | PA | 1550 | 3.43 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 18.2% |
| 2009 | MD | 1520 | 2.68 | Top 40% | African-American | 8.8% |
| 2009 | SC | 1510 | 3.70 | Top 10% | African-American | 80.6% |
| 2009 | NY | 1500 | 3.50 | Bottom 40% | South Asian | 12.3% |
| 2009 | NJ | 1500 | 3.20 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 7.6% |
| 2009 | NJ | 1500 | 2.80 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 2.9% |
| 2009 | NJ | 1490 | 3.23 | Class Not Ranked | South Asian | 7.6% |
| 2009 | MD | 1490 | 3.00 | Unknown | African-American | 16.3% |
| 2009 | XX | 1450 | 3.83 | Top 20% | Hispanic | 21.1% |
| 2009 | PA | 1360 | 3.20 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 2.5% |
| 2009 | MD | 1330 | 3.00 | Unknown | African-American | 5.1% |
| 2009 | PA | 1300 | 3.90 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 94.5% |
| 2009 | MD | 1290 | 3.00 | Bottom 50% | Caucasian | 3.2% |
| 2009 | TX | 1230 | 3.30 | Bottom 40% | Caucasian | 56.6% |
| 2009 | PA | 1200 | 3.50 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 65.1% |
| 2009 | OH | 30 | 3.68 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 94.0% |
| 2009 | NY | 30 | 3.40 | Unknown | Caucasian | 88.7% |
| 2009 | MD | 36 | 3.96 | Class Not Ranked | Other | 100.0% |
| 2009 | NJ | 32 | 3.15 | Top 20% | None Indicated | 91.3% |
| 2009 | NJ | 32 | 3.43 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 95.6% |
| 2009 | IL | 31 | 3.18 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 87.8% |
| 2009 | WA | 31 | 2.80 | Bottom 50% | Caucasian | 69.5% |
| 2009 | IL | 31 | 3.58 | Unknown | Caucasian | 95.3% |
| 2009 | NJ | 30 | 3.27 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 84.9% |
| 2009 | FL | 30 | 3.33 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 86.8% |
| 2009 | CO | 29 | 3.52 | Top 30% | Caucasian | 86.0% |
| 2009 | GA | 29 | 3.45 | Class Not Ranked | African-American | 84.7% |
| 2009 | MD | 28 | 3.81 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 97.3% |
| 2009 | NJ | 28 | 3.50 | Unknown | Caucasian | 79.7% |
| 2009 | AL | 28 | 4.00 | Valedictorian | Caucasian | 93.8% |
| 2009 | FL | 28 | 3.50 | Top 30% | Caucasian | 78.4% |
| 2009 | IL | 27 | 3.60 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 75.9% |
| 2009 | CA | 27 | 3.28 | Unknown | Caucasian | 58.1% |
| 2009 | NJ | 27 | 3.30 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 59.3% |
| 2009 | VT | 26 | 3.70 | Top 20% | None Indicated | 73.4% |
| 2009 | GA | 25 | 3.40 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 44.4% |
| 2009 | FL | 24 | 3.20 | Top 40% | Other | 21.1% |
| 2009 | MA | 24 | 2.80 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 9.9% |
| 2009 | MO | 24 | 3.46 | Unknown | Caucasian | 37.2% |
| 2009 | MI | 24 | 3.25 | Bottom 50% | Caucasian | 22.4% |
| 2009 | MD | 23 | 3.75 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 76.2% |
| 2009 | DC | 18 | 3.30 | Top 40% | East Asian | 1.9% |
| 2008 | WA | 2400 | 4.00 | Valedictorian | East Asian | 99.9% |
| 2008 | MD | 2350 | 4.00 | Valedictorian | South Asian | 100.0% |
| 2008 | MD | 2270 | 3.55 | Unknown | East Asian | 99.7% |
| 2008 | MD | 2260 | 3.91 | Unknown | Other | 99.9% |
| 2008 | NJ | 2230 | 3.10 | Top 10% | East Asian | 95.5% |
| 2008 | DC | 2220 | 3.70 | Unknown | African-American | 98.9% |
| 2008 | MD | 2220 | 3.98 | Unknown | None Indicated | 99.9% |
| 2008 | MD | 2210 | 3.85 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 99.8% |
| 2008 | MD | 2190 | 4.00 | Top 1% | None Indicated | 99.9% |
| 2008 | MD | 2170 | 3.90 | Top 10% | Native American | 99.8% |
| 2008 | NY | 2160 | 3.85 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 98.9% |
| 2008 | NJ | 2150 | 3.52 | Unknown | None Indicated | 97.0% |
| 2008 | MD | 2130 | 3.70 | Top 10% | None Indicated | 99.5% |
| 2008 | MD | 2130 | 3.20 | Bottom 40% | Caucasian | 97.6% |
| 2008 | MD | 2130 | 3.70 | Unknown | Middle-Eastern | 99.5% |
| 2008 | NV | 2120 | 3.50 | Unknown | Caucasian | 96.1% |
| 2008 | MD | 2120 | 3.30 | Unknown | African-American | 98.4% |
| 2008 | MD | 2110 | 3.50 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 99.1% |
| 2008 | MD | 2110 | 3.90 | Top 5% | East Asian | 99.6% |
| 2008 | NJ | 2100 | 3.90 | Unknown | Caucasian | 98.3% |
| 2008 | NY | 2090 | 3.90 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 99.2% |
| 2008 | MD | 2090 | 3.30 | Top 20% | Other | 98.0% |
| 2008 | NJ | 2090 | 3.70 | Unknown | Caucasian | 97.0% |
| 2008 | NJ | 2090 | 3.70 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 96.9% |
| 2008 | MD | 2090 | 3.87 | Unknown | Caucasian | 99.5% |
| 2008 | FL | 2080 | 4.00 | Valedictorian | Caucasian | 98.6% |
| 2008 | MD | 2070 | 3.81 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 99.6% |
| 2008 | PA | 2070 | 4.00 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 98.4% |
| 2008 | MD | 2060 | 3.60 | Unknown | Caucasian | 98.8% |
| 2008 | NJ | 2040 | 3.77 | Unknown | Caucasian | 96.3% |
| 2008 | VA | 2040 | 3.90 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 97.4% |
| 2008 | MD | 2040 | 3.80 | Unknown | Caucasian | 99.2% |
| 2008 | VA | 2040 | 3.80 | Top 10% | South Asian | 96.6% |
| 2008 | NJ | 2030 | 3.75 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 95.7% |
| 2008 | CT | 2030 | 3.10 | Top 40% | Hispanic | 79.1% |
| 2008 | MD | 2030 | 3.50 | Unknown | South Asian | 98.1% |
| 2008 | NY | 2020 | 3.70 | Top 10% | Hispanic | 94.9% |
| 2008 | NY | 2000 | 3.60 | Unknown | Caucasian | 92.4% |
| 2008 | MD | 2000 | 3.54 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 97.9% |
| 2008 | PA | 2000 | 3.63 | Unknown | None Indicated | 93.0% |
| 2008 | NJ | 1970 | 3.60 | Unknown | Caucasian | 90.6% |
| 2008 | DE | 1940 | 3.78 | Unknown | Caucasian | 92.3% |
| 2008 | NY | 1930 | 3.30 | Top 30% | Caucasian | 77.8% |
| 2008 | MD | 1920 | 3.95 | Top 10% | None Indicated | 98.6% |
| 2008 | NY | 1910 | 3.70 | Top 10% | African-American | 88.8% |
| 2008 | NJ | 1910 | 3.79 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 90.5% |
| 2008 | NY | 1870 | 2.76 | Unknown | Caucasian | 33.3% |
| 2008 | MA | 1860 | 3.99 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 91.7% |
| 2008 | MD | 1850 | 3.30 | Top 25% | Caucasian | 87.5% |
| 2008 | NY | 1820 | 3.80 | Unknown | East Asian | 99.8% |
| 2008 | NY | 1820 | 3.80 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 83.0% |
| 2008 | KS | 1800 | 3.10 | Bottom 50% | Caucasian | 42.2% |
| 2008 | MA | 1800 | 3.00 | Top 40% | Caucasian | 31.9% |
| 2008 | MD | 1770 | 3.00 | Top 20% | East Asian | 63.6% |
| 2008 | SC | 1750 | 3.90 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 78.9% |
| 2008 | (Private) | 1730 | 3.76 | Top 20% | None Indicated | 93.2% |
| 2008 | TX | 1700 | 3.30 | Top 20% | Hispanic | 33.8% |
| 2008 | MD | 1680 | 4.00 | Top 20% | African-American | 91.7% |
| 2008 | MD | 1640 | 3.00 | Class Not Ranked | African-American | 39.1% |
| 2008 | MD | 1580 | 3.40 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 52.6% |
| 2008 | NH | 1510 | 3.20 | Unknown | Caucasian | 8.1% |
| 2008 | NJ | 1440 | 3.40 | Bottom 50% | Other | 6.6% |
| 2008 | MD | 1240 | 2.70 | Class Not Ranked | Hispanic | 1.2% |
| 2008 | MN | 33 | 3.88 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 99.1% |
| 2008 | HI | 31 | 3.50 | Class Not Ranked | Hispanic | 94.2% |
| 2008 | NY | 30 | 3.80 | Top 5% | Other | 95.8% |
| 2008 | WI | 29 | 3.86 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 94.3% |
| 2008 | CO | 28 | 3.42 | Class Not Ranked | South Asian | 76.2% |
| 2008 | (Private) | 27 | 3.15 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 49.9% |
| 2008 | IL | 27 | 3.75 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 82.6% |
| 2008 | NJ | 1 | 3.50 | Top 3% | Caucasian | 0.0% |
| 2007 | MD | 2400 | 4.00 | Valedictorian | Caucasian | 100.0% |
| 2007 | MD | 2330 | 3.98 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 99.9% |
| 2007 | MD | 2330 | 4.00 | Salutatorian | East Asian | 100.0% |
| 2007 | MD | 2260 | 3.73 | Top 20% | East Asian | 99.8% |
| 2007 | VA | 2260 | 3.90 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 99.5% |
| 2007 | NJ | 2140 | 4.00 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 99.1% |
| 2007 | MD | 2140 | 3.73 | Top 20% | East Asian | 99.5% |
| 2007 | MD | 2140 | 3.74 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 99.6% |
| 2007 | MD | 2140 | 3.70 | Unknown | East Asian | 99.5% |
| 2007 | MD | 2120 | 3.96 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 99.7% |
| 2007 | VA | 2100 | 4.00 | Top 1% | Caucasian | 98.8% |
| 2007 | MD | 2080 | 3.60 | Class Not Ranked | Other | 99.0% |
| 2007 | HI | 2060 | 3.95 | Top 1% | East Asian | 98.1% |
| 2007 | MD | 2060 | 3.70 | Class Not Ranked | African-American | 99.1% |
| 2007 | NY | 2030 | 3.10 | Top 20% | Other | 90.2% |
| 2007 | MD | 2010 | 4.00 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 99.4% |
| 2007 | FL | 1990 | 3.77 | Unknown | Caucasian | 94.5% |
| 2007 | MD | 1650 | 3.75 | Unknown | African-American | 82.5% |
| 2007 | OH | 29 | 3.74 | Top 5% | Other | 92.5% |
| 2007 | GA | 27 | 3.20 | Top 40% | Caucasian | 49.8% |
| 2006 | MD | 2300 | 3.95 | Top 5% | South Asian | 99.9% |
| 2006 | NM | 2060 | 3.91 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 97.7% |
| 2006 | PA | 1750 | 3.20 | Unknown | Caucasian | 37.3% |
| 2006 | MD | 900 | 3.20 | Unknown | Hispanic | 0.3% |
| 2006 | CO | 29 | 3.50 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 86.0% |
| 2006 | XX | | 0.00 | Unknown | None Indicated | 0.0% |
| 2003 | NJ | 2190 | 3.40 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 97.1% |
| |