University of Maryland, College Park Applications and Decisions
Below is a list of applicants who have demonstrated interest in University of Maryland, College Park. Our best formula
for this college is based on
201 members who were accepted or rejected. The formula
has a college admissions prediction accuracy of
90%?.
Because not all members have filled out the most recent version of our survey, some predictions are made based on
less-accurate models. Those are noted with an asterisk (*) next to their prediction.
This is a very popular school, so we're only showing you profiles that have received an admissions decision. If you
want to see all applicants to this school,
click here (caution: the page will take awhile to load).
|
| 2009 | MD | 2130 | 3.96 | Top 5% | East Asian | 99.7% |
| 2009 | PA | 2070 | 3.36 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 91.8% |
| 2009 | SC | 1930 | 3.60 | Unknown | Caucasian | 89.1% |
| 2009 | NJ | 1920 | 3.60 | Class Not Ranked | Other | 86.5% |
| 2009 | CT | 1910 | 3.20 | Unknown | African-American | 68.2% |
| 2009 | CT | 1810 | 3.57 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 71.6% |
| 2009 | MD | 1800 | 2.30 | Unknown | South Asian | 27.5% |
| 2009 | VA | 27 | 3.13 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 48.6% |
| 2008 | (Private) | 2230 | 3.85 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 99.3% |
| 2008 | MD | 2040 | 3.76 | Top 10% | South Asian | 99.1% |
| 2008 | NY | 30 | 3.80 | Top 30% | Other | 95.3% |
| 2005 | CT | 1310 | 3.50 | Unknown | None Indicated | 87.7% |
|
| 2010 | NJ | 2200 | 4.00 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 99.4% |
| 2010 | MD | 2070 | 3.73 | Unknown | East Asian | 99.2% |
| 2010 | MA | 2040 | 3.87 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 97.1% |
| 2009 | NJ | 2400 | 3.80 | Class Not Ranked | Other | 99.8% |
| 2009 | (Private) | 2350 | 3.80 | Class Not Ranked | East Asian | 99.7% |
| 2009 | MD | 2350 | 4.00 | Top 1% | Caucasian | 100.0% |
| 2009 | MD | 2330 | 4.00 | Top 5% | South Asian | 100.0% |
| 2009 | NC | 2290 | 3.90 | Top 5% | Other | 99.8% |
| 2009 | CA | 2290 | 3.90 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 99.6% |
| 2009 | MD | 2270 | 3.65 | Unknown | Caucasian | 99.8% |
| 2009 | PA | 2240 | 3.89 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 99.5% |
| 2009 | (Private) | 2240 | 3.75 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 99.2% |
| 2009 | VA | 2230 | 3.90 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 99.4% |
| 2009 | GA | 2230 | 3.50 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 98.3% |
| 2009 | MD | 2220 | 3.75 | Top 5% | None Indicated | 99.8% |
| 2009 | CT | 2210 | 3.63 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 98.7% |
| 2009 | MD | 2210 | 3.57 | Unknown | None Indicated | 99.6% |
| 2009 | MD | 2210 | 4.00 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 99.9% |
| 2009 | MD | 2200 | 3.43 | Unknown | South Asian | 99.4% |
| 2009 | MD | 2200 | 3.57 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 99.6% |
| 2009 | PA | 2200 | 3.85 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 99.2% |
| 2009 | NJ | 2200 | 3.70 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 98.7% |
| 2009 | MD | 2190 | 3.86 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 99.8% |
| 2009 | VA | 2190 | 3.70 | Class Not Ranked | None Indicated | 98.6% |
| 2009 | MD | 2190 | 4.00 | Top 1% | South Asian | 99.9% |
| 2009 | MD | 2180 | 3.41 | Class Not Ranked | South Asian | 99.3% |
| 2009 | VA | 2160 | 4.00 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 99.2% |
| 2009 | MD | 2130 | 3.65 | Top 20% | East Asian | 99.4% |
| 2009 | NJ | 2130 | 3.30 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 94.0% |
| 2009 | NJ | 2130 | 3.46 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 96.0% |
| 2009 | MD | 2120 | 3.90 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 99.7% |
| 2009 | TX | 2110 | 3.70 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 97.4% |
| 2009 | MA | 2110 | 3.87 | Top 1% | African-American | 98.4% |
| 2009 | (Private) | 2110 | 3.20 | Bottom 50% | None Indicated | 89.6% |
| 2009 | NJ | 2100 | 3.70 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 97.1% |
| 2009 | MD | 2090 | 3.81 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 99.5% |
| 2009 | NY | 2080 | 4.00 | Top 1% | Caucasian | 98.5% |
| 2009 | PA | 2070 | 3.85 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 98.5% |
| 2009 | MD | 2070 | 3.71 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 99.1% |
| 2009 | NY | 2050 | 3.84 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 97.6% |
| 2009 | (Private) | 2050 | 3.86 | Top 5% | East Asian | 97.3% |
| 2009 | (Private) | 2040 | 3.70 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 96.4% |
| 2009 | NY | 2030 | 3.70 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 95.1% |
| 2009 | NJ | 2020 | 3.70 | Top 1% | Other | 96.7% |
| 2009 | NH | 2020 | 3.87 | Top 5% | South Asian | 96.7% |
| 2009 | MD | 2020 | 3.72 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 98.8% |
| 2009 | MD | 2020 | 4.00 | Top 1% | Caucasian | 99.4% |
| 2009 | (Private) | 2010 | 3.98 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 97.3% |
| 2009 | MD | 2000 | 4.00 | Valedictorian | African-American | 99.4% |
| 2009 | FL | 2000 | 3.69 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 93.9% |
| 2009 | PA | 2000 | 3.84 | Class Not Ranked | Middle-Eastern | 95.8% |
| 2009 | PA | 1980 | 3.81 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 94.8% |
| 2009 | VA | 1960 | 3.47 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 86.6% |
| 2009 | NY | 1960 | 3.70 | Top 10% | African-American | 92.1% |
| 2009 | NY | 1960 | 3.80 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 93.9% |
| 2009 | MD | 1960 | 3.55 | Class Not Ranked | East Asian | 97.0% |
| 2009 | MA | 1950 | 3.35 | Top 30% | Caucasian | 79.9% |
| 2009 | NJ | 1950 | 3.84 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 93.9% |
| 2009 | NY | 1940 | 4.00 | Top 10% | None Indicated | 99.0% |
| 2009 | MD | 1940 | 3.80 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 98.2% |
| 2009 | NJ | 1930 | 3.78 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 93.0% |
| 2009 | NY | 1930 | 3.90 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 93.8% |
| 2009 | RI | 1930 | 3.41 | Class Not Ranked | South Asian | 80.9% |
| 2009 | MD | 1930 | 3.50 | Top 25% | Caucasian | 95.6% |
| 2009 | MD | 1920 | 3.83 | Top 5% | Hispanic | 98.1% |
| 2009 | WA | 1910 | 3.48 | Top 30% | East Asian | 80.3% |
| 2009 | MD | 1910 | 3.83 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 97.8% |
| 2009 | MD | 1890 | 3.69 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 99.5% |
| 2009 | CA | 1880 | 3.67 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 84.6% |
| 2009 | MD | 1880 | 3.46 | Top 5% | None Indicated | 93.7% |
| 2009 | MD | 1880 | 3.48 | Unknown | Caucasian | 93.7% |
| 2009 | MD | 1880 | 3.62 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 95.4% |
| 2009 | NY | 1880 | 3.65 | Top 30% | Caucasian | 83.2% |
| 2009 | MD | 1870 | 3.60 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 95.5% |
| 2009 | MD | 1870 | 3.55 | Top 40% | Caucasian | 93.4% |
| 2009 | PA | 1850 | 3.90 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 89.1% |
| 2009 | CA | 1850 | 3.65 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 80.4% |
| 2009 | MD | 1850 | 3.60 | Top 30% | African-American | 93.6% |
| 2009 | MD | 1850 | 3.57 | Unknown | South Asian | 93.6% |
| 2009 | MD | 1830 | 3.48 | Unknown | Caucasian | 94.1% |
| 2009 | NJ | 1830 | 3.78 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 83.6% |
| 2009 | MD | 1820 | 3.20 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 82.8% |
| 2009 | MD | 1760 | 3.50 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 91.2% |
| 2009 | NJ | 1760 | 3.52 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 71.9% |
| 2009 | PA | 1750 | 3.70 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 68.6% |
| 2009 | MD | 1750 | 3.54 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 86.1% |
| 2009 | NJ | 1740 | 3.43 | Class Not Ranked | East Asian | 49.9% |
| 2009 | NY | 1710 | 3.50 | Class Not Ranked | African-American | 48.4% |
| 2009 | MD | 1700 | 3.43 | Top 30% | East Asian | 74.2% |
| 2009 | NJ | 1680 | 3.68 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 53.3% |
| 2009 | MD | 1670 | 3.70 | Top 10% | African-American | 88.5% |
| 2009 | MD | 1670 | 3.10 | Class Not Ranked | African-American | 51.3% |
| 2009 | OH | 31 | 3.85 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 97.6% |
| 2009 | CA | 30 | 3.95 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 97.0% |
| 2009 | UT | 29 | 3.70 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 91.1% |
| 2009 | NC | 29 | 3.42 | Top 20% | South Asian | 83.4% |
| 2009 | IL | 28 | 3.50 | Top 20% | East Asian | 79.2% |
| 2009 | NY | 28 | 3.00 | Top 40% | Other | 49.0% |
| 2009 | OH | 28 | 3.80 | Top 30% | Caucasian | 88.7% |
| 2009 | (Private) | 26 | 3.60 | Unknown | Caucasian | 68.7% |
| 2008 | CT | 2370 | 3.98 | Top 1% | Caucasian | 99.8% |
| 2008 | (Private) | 2360 | 4.00 | Valedictorian | East Asian | 99.8% |
| 2008 | MD | 2340 | 4.00 | Top 5% | East Asian | 100.0% |
| 2008 | MD | 2340 | 3.63 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 99.9% |
| 2008 | MD | 2280 | 3.85 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 99.9% |
| 2008 | MD | 2280 | 4.00 | Valedictorian | East Asian | 99.9% |
| 2008 | RI | 2250 | 3.72 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 99.6% |
| 2008 | NJ | 2230 | 3.70 | Unknown | Caucasian | 99.0% |
| 2008 | PA | 2220 | 3.25 | Bottom 50% | East Asian | 96.0% |
| 2008 | MD | 2220 | 3.75 | Top 10% | Middle-Eastern | 99.8% |
| 2008 | (Private) | 2210 | 3.81 | Unknown | Caucasian | 99.1% |
| 2008 | MD | 2200 | 3.90 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 99.8% |
| 2008 | (Private) | 2190 | 3.87 | Top 10% | East Asian | 99.1% |
| 2008 | VA | 2180 | 3.66 | Unknown | Caucasian | 98.3% |
| 2008 | CA | 2130 | 3.25 | Bottom 40% | Caucasian | 91.7% |
| 2008 | MD | 2110 | 3.43 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 98.8% |
| 2008 | PA | 2090 | 3.60 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 96.2% |
| 2008 | MD | 2090 | 3.70 | Top 20% | East Asian | 99.3% |
| 2008 | NY | 2060 | 3.90 | Unknown | Hispanic | 97.7% |
| 2008 | NJ | 2060 | 3.81 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 97.1% |
| 2008 | MD | 2050 | 3.19 | Class Not Ranked | Middle-Eastern | 96.4% |
| 2008 | MD | 2040 | 3.65 | Top 20% | African-American | 98.7% |
| 2008 | MD | 2020 | 3.64 | Top 20% | East Asian | 98.5% |
| 2008 | PA | 2010 | 3.94 | Salutatorian | African-American | 97.1% |
| 2008 | NY | 2010 | 3.65 | Unknown | Caucasian | 93.7% |
| 2008 | MD | 2000 | 3.67 | Unknown | Caucasian | 98.4% |
| 2008 | NY | 2000 | 3.65 | Top 20% | None Indicated | 93.1% |
| 2008 | NJ | 1980 | 3.15 | Top 30% | Caucasian | 75.2% |
| 2008 | MA | 1980 | 3.70 | Top 10% | None Indicated | 93.2% |
| 2008 | CA | 1950 | 3.25 | Top 30% | None Indicated | 75.5% |
| 2008 | NY | 1950 | 3.70 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 91.7% |
| 2008 | NJ | 1930 | 3.70 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 90.1% |
| 2008 | MD | 1930 | 3.70 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 97.5% |
| 2008 | MA | 1930 | 3.03 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 61.0% |
| 2008 | PA | 1920 | 3.80 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 91.9% |
| 2008 | NY | 1910 | 3.80 | Top 20% | East Asian | 90.7% |
| 2008 | MD | 1910 | 3.50 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 95.1% |
| 2008 | MD | 1910 | 3.86 | Top 10% | South Asian | 98.1% |
| 2008 | MD | 1900 | 3.10 | Unknown | Caucasian | 86.6% |
| 2008 | NY | 1900 | 3.50 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 80.4% |
| 2008 | FL | 1840 | 3.67 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 80.6% |
| 2008 | MD | 1830 | 3.74 | Class Not Ranked | South Asian | 95.0% |
| 2008 | MD | 1780 | 3.50 | Top 20% | African-American | 87.1% |
| 2008 | VA | 1750 | 2.75 | Top 40% | Caucasian | 14.2% |
| 2008 | NJ | 1730 | 3.54 | Unknown | Hispanic | 55.1% |
| 2008 | NY | 1530 | 3.64 | Unknown | None Indicated | 99.3% |
| 2008 | MD | 1460 | 4.00 | Unknown | Caucasian | 99.8% |
| 2008 | MD | 33 | 3.76 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 99.7% |
| 2008 | (Private) | 30 | 3.90 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 96.5% |
| 2008 | NY | 29 | 3.95 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 95.3% |
| 2007 | MD | 2330 | 3.85 | Unknown | None Indicated | 99.9% |
| 2007 | MD | 2220 | 3.50 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 99.6% |
| 2007 | MD | 2120 | 3.96 | Top 1% | Caucasian | 99.7% |
| 2007 | NJ | 2070 | 3.90 | Salutatorian | Caucasian | 98.0% |
| 2007 | VA | 1940 | 3.27 | Unknown | South Asian | 76.5% |
| 2007 | NY | 1920 | 3.65 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 90.5% |
| 2007 | MD | 1700 | 3.37 | Unknown | Caucasian | 72.7% |
| 2006 | MD | 2370 | 3.87 | Unknown | None Indicated | 100.0% |
| 2006 | MD | 2160 | 3.69 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 99.6% |
| 2006 | VA | 2020 | 3.90 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 97.0% |
| 2003 | VA | 2240 | 3.90 | Unknown | East Asian | 99.4% |
| 2003 | NJ | 2050 | 3.96 | Top 20% | Hispanic | 97.8% |
| 2002 | VA | 1420 | 4.00 | Salutatorian | Caucasian | 99.7% |
|
|
|
| 2009 | MD | 2080 | 3.87 | Top 20% | South Asian | 99.5% |
| 2009 | NJ | 2050 | 3.08 | Class Not Ranked | African-American | 82.6% |
| 2009 | NY | 2020 | 3.00 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 75.2% |
| 2009 | CA | 1900 | 3.50 | Unknown | Caucasian | 80.8% |
| 2009 | MA | 1870 | 2.87 | Class Not Ranked | Hispanic | 39.8% |
| 2009 | NY | 1820 | 3.50 | Top 20% | South Asian | 70.3% |
| 2009 | NY | 1810 | 3.00 | Unknown | Hispanic | 40.4% |
| 2009 | MD | 1810 | 3.14 | Top 30% | African-American | 76.4% |
| 2009 | CT | 1770 | 3.50 | Top 30% | Caucasian | 58.3% |
| 2009 | CT | 1710 | 3.25 | Top 40% | Caucasian | 30.3% |
| 2009 | (Private) | 1710 | 3.75 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 63.4% |
| 2009 | MD | 1670 | 2.75 | Unknown | Caucasian | 30.1% |
| 2009 | MD | 1660 | 3.13 | Top 20% | East Asian | 50.2% |
| 2009 | MD | 1640 | 3.57 | Unknown | Caucasian | 73.4% |
| 2009 | NY | 1570 | 3.50 | Top 5% | African-American | 24.4% |
| 2009 | MD | 1470 | 3.40 | Top 20% | African-American | 30.9% |
| 2009 | CA | 1270 | 2.92 | Bottom 40% | African-American | 0.5% |
| 2009 | MN | 26 | 3.03 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 33.8% |
| 2008 | NJ | 1980 | 3.00 | Unknown | Caucasian | 69.0% |
| 2008 | PA | 1970 | 3.85 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 94.8% |
| 2008 | NJ | 1860 | 3.19 | Unknown | South Asian | 63.9% |
| 2008 | NJ | 1820 | 3.70 | Unknown | Caucasian | 79.1% |
| 2008 | PA | 1760 | 3.39 | Top 20% | South Asian | 50.9% |
| 2008 | NJ | 1450 | 3.40 | Unknown | African-American | 8.4% |
| 2008 | NY | 29 | 3.40 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 82.6% |
| 2007 | PA | 1940 | 3.51 | Top 30% | Caucasian | 84.8% |
| |