University of Florida Applications and Decisions
Below is a list of applicants who have demonstrated interest in University of Florida. Our best formula
for this college is based on
201 members who were accepted or rejected. The formula
has a college admissions prediction accuracy of
89%?.
Because not all members have filled out the most recent version of our survey, some predictions are made based on
less-accurate models. Those are noted with an asterisk (*) next to their prediction.
This is a very popular school, so we're only showing you profiles that have received an admissions decision. If you
want to see all applicants to this school,
click here (caution: the page will take awhile to load).
|
| 2010 | (Private) | 2170 | 3.91 | Top 2% | Caucasian | 99.9% |
| 2010 | FL | 2100 | 3.84 | Top 5% | Hispanic | 99.4% |
| 2010 | FL | 2080 | 3.70 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 72.3% |
| 2010 | FL | 2070 | 3.90 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 99.5% |
| 2010 | CA | 2040 | 3.25 | Top 2% | Hispanic | 91.4% |
| 2010 | FL | 1960 | 3.32 | Top 25% | Other | 14.9% |
| 2010 | FL | 1850 | 3.58 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 90.4% |
| 2010 | FL | 1830 | 3.90 | Top 5% | East Asian | 96.8% |
| 2010 | FL | 1820 | 3.70 | Top 15% | Caucasian | 59.1% |
| 2010 | FL | 1810 | 3.29 | Top 10% | African-American | 83.5% |
| 2010 | FL | 1790 | 3.70 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 83.6% |
| 2010 | FL | 1770 | 3.94 | Class Not Ranked | Hispanic | 52.5% |
| 2010 | FL | 28 | 3.60 | Top 10% | Hispanic | 90.5% |
| 2010 | FL | 25 | 3.28 | Top 25% | Caucasian | 3.5% |
| 2009 | FL | 2270 | 3.76 | Top 1% | East Asian | 99.9% |
| 2009 | FL | 2250 | 3.92 | Top 5% | East Asian | 99.8% |
| 2009 | FL | 2230 | 3.50 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 82.6% |
| 2009 | FL | 2110 | 4.00 | Top 1% | Caucasian | 99.8% |
| 2009 | FL | 2110 | 3.60 | Top 10% | East Asian | 97.6% |
| 2009 | FL | 2110 | 4.00 | Top 1% | Caucasian | 99.8% |
| 2009 | FL | 2090 | 3.10 | Unknown | Caucasian | 87.9% |
| 2009 | FL | 2080 | 3.70 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 99.3% |
| 2009 | FL | 2020 | 3.70 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 95.8% |
| 2009 | FL | 2000 | 3.69 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 82.6% |
| 2009 | FL | 1990 | 3.90 | Top 5% | South Asian | 98.9% |
| 2009 | FL | 1980 | 3.90 | Top 1% | Hispanic | 99.6% |
| 2009 | FL | 1960 | 3.80 | Top 2% | Hispanic | 99.7% |
| 2009 | FL | 1960 | 3.30 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 93.2% |
| 2009 | FL | 1960 | 4.00 | Top 1% | South Asian | 99.6% |
| 2009 | FL | 1930 | 3.70 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 92.7% |
| 2009 | FL | 1920 | 3.48 | Top 20% | Hispanic | 37.8% |
| 2009 | FL | 1890 | 3.60 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 34.1% |
| 2009 | FL | 1800 | 3.69 | Top 5% | Hispanic | 95.9% |
| 2009 | FL | 1780 | 3.46 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 19.8% |
| 2009 | FL | 1720 | 3.80 | Valedictorian | African-American | 98.4% |
| 2009 | FL | 1680 | 3.90 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 15.9% |
| 2009 | FL | 1620 | 3.84 | Top 5% | Hispanic | 88.0% |
| 2009 | FL | 1490 | 3.84 | Top 5% | African-American | 75.7% |
| 2009 | FL | 28 | 3.98 | Top 1% | Caucasian | 99.3% |
| 2008 | FL | 2160 | 3.85 | Unknown | Middle-Eastern | 93.5% |
| 2008 | FL | 2030 | 3.88 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 99.1% |
| 2008 | FL | 1970 | 3.80 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 98.7% |
| 2008 | FL | 1910 | 3.50 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 91.4% |
| 2008 | FL | 1790 | 3.80 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 96.7% |
| 2008 | FL | 1790 | 3.68 | Top 5% | Hispanic | 95.6% |
| 2008 | FL | 1740 | 3.70 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 78.4% |
| 2008 | FL | 1430 | 3.80 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 98.2% |
| 2007 | FL | 1880 | 3.65 | Top 10% | Hispanic | 90.1% |
| 2006 | FL | 1850 | 3.73 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 88.4% |
|
| 2011 | FL | 2110 | 3.80 | Top 5% | Hispanic | 99.5% |
| 2011 | FL | 1400 | 4.00 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 90.9% |
| 2010 | NC | 2370 | 3.40 | Top 30% | Caucasian | 2.8% |
| 2010 | FL | 2370 | 4.00 | Valedictorian | Caucasian | 100.0% |
| 2010 | FL | 2370 | 4.00 | Valedictorian | South Asian | 100.0% |
| 2010 | FL | 2360 | 3.94 | Top 2% | Caucasian | 100.0% |
| 2010 | (Private) | 2350 | 3.40 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 31.2% |
| 2010 | FL | 2340 | 4.00 | Valedictorian | Caucasian | 100.0% |
| 2010 | FL | 2320 | 3.96 | Top 1% | Caucasian | 100.0% |
| 2010 | TX | 2310 | 3.83 | Salutatorian | Caucasian | 99.3% |
| 2010 | FL | 2310 | 3.98 | Top 1% | Caucasian | 100.0% |
| 2010 | FL | 2310 | 3.49 | Top 10% | Hispanic | 99.3% |
| 2010 | FL | 2300 | 3.78 | Top 2% | Hispanic | 99.9% |
| 2010 | (Private) | 2280 | 3.96 | Top 2% | Caucasian | 99.9% |
| 2010 | FL | 2270 | 3.72 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 96.6% |
| 2010 | FL | 2270 | 3.93 | Top 2% | Caucasian | 99.9% |
| 2010 | (Private) | 2250 | 3.72 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 99.8% |
| 2010 | CO | 2250 | 3.90 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 95.6% |
| 2010 | XX | 2230 | 3.80 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 80.9% |
| 2010 | FL | 2220 | 4.00 | Valedictorian | Caucasian | 99.9% |
| 2010 | FL | 2210 | 4.00 | Valedictorian | East Asian | 99.9% |
| 2010 | FL | 2200 | 2.85 | Unknown | Caucasian | 93.2% |
| 2010 | (Private) | 2160 | 3.91 | Top 5% | East Asian | 97.5% |
| 2010 | FL | 2160 | 4.00 | Valedictorian | Caucasian | 100.0% |
| 2010 | NJ | 2150 | 3.90 | Top 4% | Caucasian | 93.7% |
| 2010 | FL | 2150 | 3.96 | Top 1% | Caucasian | 99.9% |
| 2010 | TX | 2120 | 3.50 | Top 25% | South Asian | 2.3% |
| 2010 | FL | 2100 | 3.75 | Top 2% | Hispanic | 99.8% |
| 2010 | FL | 2100 | 3.97 | Top 2% | Caucasian | 99.8% |
| 2010 | FL | 2090 | 3.80 | Top 3% | Hispanic | 99.7% |
| 2010 | FL | 2080 | 3.56 | Class Not Ranked | Hispanic | 88.5% |
| 2010 | NH | 2070 | 3.73 | Top 10% | South Asian | 59.2% |
| 2010 | FL | 2060 | 4.00 | Valedictorian | Caucasian | 99.8% |
| 2010 | NC | 2060 | 3.75 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 24.2% |
| 2010 | FL | 2060 | 3.35 | Top 2% | Hispanic | 99.6% |
| 2010 | FL | 2040 | 3.89 | Top 1% | Caucasian | 99.9% |
| 2010 | NJ | 2040 | 3.95 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 22.8% |
| 2010 | FL | 2040 | 4.00 | Top 1% | Caucasian | 99.7% |
| 2010 | FL | 2010 | 3.63 | Top 25% | Caucasian | 21.2% |
| 2010 | FL | 2000 | 4.00 | Salutatorian | None Indicated | 99.8% |
| 2010 | FL | 1990 | 3.50 | Top 10% | East Asian | 97.8% |
| 2010 | FL | 1990 | 4.00 | Top 3% | Caucasian | 99.6% |
| 2010 | FL | 1980 | 3.80 | Top 3% | Caucasian | 99.6% |
| 2010 | FL | 1970 | 3.45 | Top 3% | Caucasian | 99.2% |
| 2010 | FL | 1970 | 4.00 | Valedictorian | South Asian | 99.7% |
| 2010 | FL | 1950 | 3.82 | Top 3% | Caucasian | 99.1% |
| 2010 | FL | 1940 | 3.74 | Top 15% | Caucasian | 91.9% |
| 2010 | OH | 1930 | 3.80 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 36.7% |
| 2010 | FL | 1930 | 4.00 | Valedictorian | Hispanic | 99.6% |
| 2010 | FL | 1930 | 3.78 | Top 10% | South Asian | 92.9% |
| 2010 | FL | 1920 | 3.90 | Top 4% | Caucasian | 99.3% |
| 2010 | FL | 1910 | 3.48 | Top 10% | Native American | 91.3% |
| 2010 | FL | 1900 | 3.50 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 69.6% |
| 2010 | FL | 1890 | 4.00 | Top 10% | Hispanic | 98.1% |
| 2010 | FL | 1890 | 3.40 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 95.2% |
| 2010 | FL | 1870 | 3.38 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 29.6% |
| 2010 | MD | 1870 | 3.57 | Top 30% | Caucasian | 0.1% |
| 2010 | FL | 1860 | 3.18 | Top 10% | Hispanic | 89.4% |
| 2010 | FL | 1850 | 3.48 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 95.3% |
| 2010 | FL | 1840 | 4.00 | Salutatorian | Caucasian | 99.5% |
| 2010 | FL | 1830 | 3.46 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 95.3% |
| 2010 | FL | 1830 | 3.17 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 84.9% |
| 2010 | FL | 1810 | 3.45 | Top 15% | South Asian | 68.0% |
| 2010 | GA | 1800 | 3.78 | Top 10% | African-American | 23.0% |
| 2010 | FL | 1760 | 3.78 | Top 2% | Hispanic | 98.6% |
| 2010 | FL | 1710 | 3.53 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 73.9% |
| 2010 | FL | 1670 | 3.73 | Top 5% | Other | 90.9% |
| 2010 | FL | 1650 | 3.78 | Top 2% | Caucasian | 95.5% |
| 2010 | FL | 1630 | 4.00 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 97.2% |
| 2010 | FL | 1520 | 3.75 | Top 10% | Hispanic | 46.3% |
| 2010 | FL | 33 | 3.60 | Top 10% | Native American | 98.6% |
| 2010 | FL | 32 | 3.85 | Top 15% | Caucasian | 92.1% |
| 2010 | FL | 32 | 3.86 | Top 1% | Middle-Eastern | 99.9% |
| 2010 | FL | 31 | 3.80 | Class Not Ranked | None Indicated | 88.6% |
| 2010 | FL | 31 | 3.80 | Unknown | None Indicated | 88.6% |
| 2010 | MI | 31 | 3.59 | Top 30% | Caucasian | 0.4% |
| 2010 | FL | 30 | 3.90 | Class Not Ranked | Middle-Eastern | 84.3% |
| 2010 | FL | 30 | 3.87 | Top 3% | East Asian | 99.4% |
| 2010 | FL | 30 | 3.70 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 95.6% |
| 2009 | FL | 2380 | 3.95 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 99.9% |
| 2009 | FL | 2350 | 4.00 | Valedictorian | Caucasian | 100.0% |
| 2009 | FL | 2320 | 4.00 | Valedictorian | Caucasian | 100.0% |
| 2009 | FL | 2310 | 4.00 | Salutatorian | Caucasian | 100.0% |
| 2009 | FL | 2310 | 3.67 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 99.4% |
| 2009 | GA | 2260 | 3.87 | Unknown | Caucasian | 56.2% |
| 2009 | FL | 2260 | 3.97 | Top 1% | Caucasian | 99.9% |
| 2009 | FL | 2250 | 3.92 | Salutatorian | South Asian | 100.0% |
| 2009 | FL | 2240 | 3.99 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 99.8% |
| 2009 | FL | 2230 | 3.75 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 98.9% |
| 2009 | FL | 2220 | 3.30 | Unknown | South Asian | 94.8% |
| 2009 | FL | 2210 | 3.70 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 95.0% |
| 2009 | FL | 2210 | 4.00 | Valedictorian | Caucasian | 99.9% |
| 2009 | TX | 2180 | 3.62 | Unknown | South Asian | 40.6% |
| 2009 | FL | 2180 | 3.83 | Top 5% | Native American | 99.7% |
| 2009 | FL | 2180 | 3.92 | Top 5% | South Asian | 99.7% |
| 2009 | FL | 2160 | 4.00 | Valedictorian | Hispanic | 99.9% |
| 2009 | FL | 2140 | 3.68 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 98.1% |
| 2009 | FL | 2130 | 3.90 | Top 1% | None Indicated | 99.9% |
| 2009 | FL | 2120 | 3.80 | Top 1% | East Asian | 99.8% |
| 2009 | GA | 2110 | 3.75 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 95.8% |
| 2009 | FL | 2110 | 3.91 | Top 1% | East Asian | 99.9% |
| 2009 | FL | 2110 | 4.00 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 99.6% |
| 2009 | FL | 2110 | 3.79 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 97.7% |
| 2009 | DC | 2110 | 3.70 | Top 5% | Middle-Eastern | 88.9% |
| 2009 | FL | 2100 | 3.90 | Top 5% | Hispanic | 99.4% |
| 2009 | FL | 2100 | 3.65 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 67.9% |
| 2009 | FL | 2080 | 4.00 | Valedictorian | South Asian | 99.9% |
| 2009 | NY | 2080 | 4.00 | Top 1% | Caucasian | 95.8% |
| 2009 | FL | 2070 | 4.00 | Salutatorian | Caucasian | 99.9% |
| 2009 | (Private) | 2070 | 4.00 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 87.1% |
| 2009 | FL | 2070 | 3.86 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 97.1% |
| 2009 | FL | 2070 | 4.00 | Top 1% | Caucasian | 99.8% |
| 2009 | FL | 2030 | 3.48 | Top 10% | African-American | 96.8% |
| 2009 | FL | 2030 | 3.92 | Top 1% | Hispanic | 99.8% |
| 2009 | FL | 2030 | 3.50 | Top 10% | South Asian | 95.9% |
| 2009 | FL | 2020 | 3.75 | Top 5% | Hispanic | 99.0% |
| 2009 | FL | 2000 | 3.80 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 99.9% |
| 2009 | FL | 1990 | 3.90 | Top 1% | Hispanic | 99.6% |
| 2009 | FL | 1970 | 3.85 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 98.7% |
| 2009 | FL | 1960 | 4.00 | Valedictorian | East Asian | 99.7% |
| 2009 | FL | 1940 | 3.52 | Top 10% | Hispanic | 95.4% |
| 2009 | FL | 1940 | 3.70 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 98.3% |
| 2009 | FL | 1920 | 4.00 | Top 1% | Caucasian | 100.0% |
| 2009 | FL | 1920 | 3.10 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 70.0% |
| 2009 | FL | 1910 | 3.86 | Top 5% | Hispanic | 98.1% |
| 2009 | FL | 1900 | 3.94 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 98.0% |
| 2009 | FL | 1890 | 3.51 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 90.3% |
| 2009 | FL | 1890 | 3.51 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 97.5% |
| 2009 | FL | 1890 | 3.80 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 97.7% |
| 2009 | FL | 1890 | 3.70 | Top 10% | East Asian | 90.7% |
| 2009 | FL | 1870 | 3.80 | Top 1% | Hispanic | 99.5% |
| 2009 | FL | 1870 | 3.70 | Top 5% | East Asian | 97.3% |
| 2009 | FL | 1860 | 3.66 | Top 5% | Hispanic | 97.1% |
| 2009 | FL | 1840 | 3.60 | Top 5% | Hispanic | 98.4% |
| 2009 | FL | 1820 | 3.70 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 96.6% |
| 2009 | FL | 1790 | 3.58 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 86.4% |
| 2009 | FL | 1740 | 3.72 | Top 10% | Hispanic | 78.5% |
| 2009 | FL | 1740 | 3.76 | Top 5% | African-American | 94.1% |
| 2009 | FL | 1720 | 3.78 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 76.4% |
| 2009 | FL | 1700 | 3.00 | Top 5% | Hispanic | 94.5% |
| 2009 | FL | 1670 | 3.55 | Top 5% | Hispanic | 90.4% |
| 2009 | FL | 35 | 3.98 | Salutatorian | Caucasian | 100.0% |
| 2009 | FL | 34 | 3.75 | Top 10% | None Indicated | 99.2% |
| 2009 | FL | 29 | 4.00 | Top 10% | Hispanic | 94.1% |
| 2009 | FL | 27 | 3.35 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 85.6% |
| 2009 | FL | 23 | 3.68 | Unknown | Caucasian | 25.5% |
| 2008 | FL | 2370 | 4.00 | Valedictorian | None Indicated | 100.0% |
| 2008 | FL | 2290 | 3.90 | Top 1% | None Indicated | 100.0% |
| 2008 | FL | 2270 | 3.94 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 99.8% |
| 2008 | FL | 2170 | 3.95 | Top 5% | South Asian | 99.7% |
| 2008 | FL | 2170 | 3.60 | Top 5% | South Asian | 99.6% |
| 2008 | FL | 2160 | 4.00 | Valedictorian | Hispanic | 100.0% |
| 2008 | FL | 2160 | 4.00 | Top 1% | East Asian | 99.9% |
| 2008 | FL | 2140 | 3.93 | Top 1% | None Indicated | 99.9% |
| 2008 | FL | 2130 | 3.80 | Top 5% | None Indicated | 99.7% |
| 2008 | FL | 2130 | 3.80 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 72.9% |
| 2008 | FL | 2130 | 3.80 | Top 5% | Other | 99.5% |
| 2008 | FL | 2090 | 3.90 | Unknown | Hispanic | 90.2% |
| 2008 | FL | 2080 | 3.97 | Top 1% | Middle-Eastern | 99.8% |
| 2008 | FL | 2070 | 3.79 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 99.3% |
| 2008 | (Private) | 2070 | 3.95 | Top 1% | African-American | 99.8% |
| 2008 | FL | 2050 | 3.92 | Top 1% | Hispanic | 99.9% |
| 2008 | FL | 2040 | 3.50 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 57.6% |
| 2008 | FL | 2020 | 3.93 | Unknown | Hispanic | 85.2% |
| 2008 | MD | 2000 | 3.67 | Unknown | Caucasian | 17.3% |
| 2008 | FL | 1990 | 3.65 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 98.8% |
| 2008 | FL | 1940 | 4.00 | Top 1% | Hispanic | 99.9% |
| 2008 | FL | 1940 | 4.00 | Valedictorian | Caucasian | 99.6% |
| 2008 | (Private) | 1900 | 3.80 | Top 5% | Native American | 97.9% |
| 2008 | VA | 1890 | 3.76 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 65.5% |
| 2008 | FL | 1880 | 3.90 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 99.3% |
| 2008 | FL | 1850 | 3.78 | Top 5% | Hispanic | 97.7% |
| 2008 | FL | 1840 | 3.67 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 87.4% |
| 2008 | FL | 1680 | 3.50 | Unknown | Caucasian | 41.9% |
| 2008 | FL | 1590 | 3.20 | Unknown | Hispanic | 21.2% |
| 2008 | FL | 1570 | 3.50 | Unknown | Caucasian | 41.9% |
| 2008 | FL | 1480 | 3.65 | Top 5% | South Asian | 80.8% |
| 2008 | FL | 35 | 3.97 | Salutatorian | Caucasian | 100.0% |
| 2008 | FL | 35 | 3.98 | Top 1% | South Asian | 100.0% |
| 2008 | MO | 34 | 4.00 | Top 1% | Caucasian | 98.7% |
| 2008 | FL | 33 | 3.90 | Top 5% | South Asian | 99.7% |
| 2008 | (Private) | 31 | 3.93 | Top 1% | South Asian | 99.8% |
| 2008 | FL | 31 | 3.40 | Top 20% | Hispanic | 61.6% |
| 2008 | FL | 29 | 3.70 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 98.4% |
| 2007 | FL | 2240 | 3.98 | Valedictorian | Caucasian | 100.0% |
| 2007 | FL | 2150 | 3.85 | Top 1% | Caucasian | 99.9% |
| 2007 | FL | 2100 | 4.00 | Unknown | Hispanic | 90.9% |
| 2007 | FL | 2080 | 3.60 | Top 10% | Hispanic | 99.1% |
| 2007 | FL | 2010 | 3.70 | Unknown | Hispanic | 83.5% |
| 2007 | ME | 1980 | 3.90 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 86.7% |
| 2007 | FL | 1950 | 3.86 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 98.5% |
| 2007 | CA | 1840 | 4.00 | Salutatorian | Hispanic | 86.2% |
| 2007 | FL | 1820 | 3.78 | Top 5% | Hispanic | 96.5% |
| 2006 | FL | 2250 | 3.83 | Top 10% | East Asian | 99.1% |
| 2006 | FL | 2040 | 3.75 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 99.1% |
| 2006 | FL | 1520 | 3.97 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 99.8% |
| 2005 | FL | 1490 | 3.85 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 99.8% |
| 2004 | FL | 2390 | 3.91 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 98.5% |
|
|
| 2011 | FL | 2070 | 3.39 | Unknown | South Asian | 87.3% |
| 2010 | FL | 2180 | 3.00 | Top 10% | Hispanic | 98.2% |
| 2010 | FL | 2160 | 3.28 | Class Not Ranked | Hispanic | 92.4% |
| 2010 | FL | 2130 | 3.51 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 97.9% |
| 2010 | CT | 2040 | 3.20 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 19.1% |
| 2010 | FL | 2020 | 3.50 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 83.5% |
| 2010 | FL | 2000 | 3.87 | Unknown | Caucasian | 83.4% |
| 2010 | FL | 1980 | 3.20 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 86.7% |
| 2010 | FL | 1960 | 3.77 | Class Not Ranked | Hispanic | 78.7% |
| 2010 | FL | 1960 | 3.20 | Top 25% | Caucasian | 14.5% |
| 2010 | FL | 1930 | 3.42 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 38.8% |
| 2010 | GA | 1910 | 3.30 | Unknown | African-American | 9.4% |
| 2010 | FL | 1900 | 3.54 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 69.8% |
| 2010 | FL | 1880 | 3.73 | Top 20% | South Asian | 34.9% |
| 2010 | FL | 1870 | 3.56 | Top 15% | Caucasian | 68.7% |
| 2010 | FL | 1860 | 3.70 | Top 20% | Hispanic | 30.4% |
| 2010 | VA | 1860 | 3.60 | Unknown | Caucasian | 7.5% |
| 2010 | FL | 1790 | 3.52 | Top 35% | South Asian | 0.6% |
| 2010 | FL | 1790 | 3.80 | Unknown | Caucasian | 55.0% |
| 2010 | NC | 1780 | 3.70 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 47.2% |
| 2010 | TX | 1750 | 3.40 | Top 25% | Caucasian | 0.2% |
| 2010 | GA | 1710 | 3.54 | Top 30% | Hispanic | 0.1% |
| 2010 | FL | 1700 | 3.69 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 83.0% |
| 2010 | FL | 1700 | 3.00 | Top 35% | Caucasian | 0.2% |
| 2010 | FL | 1680 | 3.70 | Top 15% | Hispanic | 43.3% |
| 2010 | FL | 1680 | 3.50 | Top 15% | Caucasian | 34.8% |
| 2010 | FL | 1670 | 3.90 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 87.5% |
| 2010 | VA | 1330 | 3.50 | Top 15% | Caucasian | 0.2% |
| 2010 | IL | 33 | 3.62 | Top 15% | Caucasian | 42.0% |
| 2010 | FL | 32 | 3.40 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 91.1% |
| 2010 | (Private) | 32 | 2.90 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 28.2% |
| 2010 | (Private) | 30 | 3.52 | Class Not Ranked | African-American | 17.6% |
| 2010 | NY | 28 | 3.58 | Top 25% | Caucasian | 0.5% |
| 2010 | (Private) | 26 | 3.80 | Top 15% | Caucasian | 4.9% |
| 2010 | CA | 26 | 3.50 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 1.1% |
| 2010 | FL | 23 | 3.52 | Top 10% | African-American | 58.4% |
| 2009 | FL | 2140 | 3.60 | Top 30% | Caucasian | 12.8% |
| 2009 | NJ | 2060 | 3.80 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 7.0% |
| 2009 | FL | 2060 | 3.60 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 61.6% |
| 2009 | FL | 2050 | 2.88 | Top 30% | None Indicated | 6.1% |
| 2009 | (Private) | 2000 | 3.15 | Top 20% | Hispanic | 48.6% |
| 2009 | FL | 1980 | 3.90 | Unknown | None Indicated | 81.5% |
| 2009 | GA | 1960 | 3.56 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 13.3% |
| 2009 | XX | 1890 | 3.50 | Unknown | East Asian | 8.7% |
| 2009 | PA | 1880 | 3.70 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 2.2% |
| 2009 | FL | 1880 | 3.64 | Top 20% | Hispanic | 33.0% |
| 2009 | FL | 1870 | 3.75 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 54.5% |
| 2009 | NC | 1860 | 3.96 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 60.8% |
| 2009 | FL | 1860 | 3.10 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 26.7% |
| 2009 | MA | 1860 | 3.88 | Top 10% | Hispanic | 27.3% |
| 2009 | FL | 1840 | 3.20 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 24.7% |
| 2009 | FL | 1800 | 3.00 | Top 10% | Hispanic | 81.4% |
| 2009 | XX | 1800 | 3.60 | Top 10% | None Indicated | 18.9% |
| 2009 | (Private) | 1790 | 3.45 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 4.7% |
| 2009 | FL | 1780 | 3.35 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 51.5% |
| 2009 | FL | 1750 | 3.70 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 94.3% |
| 2009 | (Private) | 1710 | 2.99 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 2.4% |
| 2009 | MA | 1710 | 3.80 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 12.0% |
| 2009 | FL | 1690 | 3.20 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 10.8% |
| 2009 | FL | 1670 | 3.80 | Top 30% | East Asian | 0.7% |
| 2009 | FL | 1660 | 3.73 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 34.9% |
| 2009 | FL | 1640 | 3.90 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 87.5% |
| 2009 | FL | 1540 | 2.90 | Top 40% | Hispanic | 0.0% |
| 2009 | FL | 1500 | 3.32 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 66.3% |
| 2009 | NC | 1470 | 3.50 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 0.1% |
| 2009 | KS | 29 | 3.78 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 3.5% |
| 2009 | DC | 29 | 3.70 | Top 10% | None Indicated | 39.3% |
| 2009 | FL | 24 | 3.40 | Top 30% | Caucasian | 0.6% |
| 2008 | NJ | 1990 | 3.79 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 46.3% |
| 2008 | MA | 1930 | 3.03 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 2.4% |
| 2008 | FL | 1740 | 3.65 | Unknown | Other | 45.4% |
| 2008 | FL | 1720 | 3.00 | Bottom 50% | Caucasian | 0.0% |
| 2008 | FL | 1690 | 3.10 | Top 30% | African-American | 0.6% |
| 2008 | XX | 1630 | 3.70 | Unknown | Hispanic | 1.8% |
| 2008 | FL | 1210 | 3.50 | Top 20% | Hispanic | 42.7% |
| 2008 | (Private) | 30 | 3.90 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 55.6% |
| 2008 | FL | 27 | 3.85 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 87.3% |
| 2007 | VA | 2130 | 3.65 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 10.3% |
| 2007 | FL | 1940 | 3.30 | Top 20% | Hispanic | 39.9% |
| 2007 | FL | 830 | 2.70 | Unknown | Other | 0.2% |
| |