University of Central Florida Applications and Decisions
Below is a list of applicants who have demonstrated interest in University of Central Florida. Our best formula
for this college is based on
99 members who were accepted or rejected. The formula
has a college admissions prediction accuracy of
5%?.
Because not all members have filled out the most recent version of our survey, some predictions are made based on
less-accurate models. Those are noted with an asterisk (*) next to their prediction.
This is a very popular school, so we're only showing you profiles that have received an admissions decision. If you
want to see all applicants to this school,
click here (caution: the page will take awhile to load).
|
| 2009 | NC | 1860 | 3.96 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 99.5% |
| 2009 | FL | 1680 | 3.01 | Unknown | Caucasian | 88.7% |
| 2009 | FL | 1630 | 3.49 | Top 5% | Hispanic | 96.4% |
| 2009 | (Private) | 21 | 3.50 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 61.8% |
| 2008 | FL | 1610 | 3.30 | Unknown | African-American | 81.8% |
| 2008 | FL | 1550 | 3.70 | Top 30% | Caucasian | 87.5% |
|
| 2010 | FL | 2340 | 4.00 | Valedictorian | Caucasian | 100.0% |
| 2010 | FL | 2320 | 3.94 | Valedictorian | Caucasian | 99.9% |
| 2010 | FL | 2310 | 3.49 | Top 10% | Hispanic | 99.9% |
| 2010 | FL | 2270 | 3.93 | Top 2% | Caucasian | 99.9% |
| 2010 | FL | 2230 | 4.00 | Top 4% | South Asian | 99.9% |
| 2010 | FL | 2190 | 4.00 | Valedictorian | Caucasian | 99.8% |
| 2010 | (Private) | 2170 | 3.91 | Top 2% | Caucasian | 99.8% |
| 2010 | FL | 2160 | 4.00 | Valedictorian | Caucasian | 99.9% |
| 2010 | FL | 2120 | 3.88 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 99.7% |
| 2010 | FL | 2090 | 3.27 | Top 25% | Caucasian | 99.7% |
| 2010 | FL | 2080 | 3.70 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 99.7% |
| 2010 | FL | 2070 | 3.90 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 99.7% |
| 2010 | FL | 2060 | 3.99 | Top 1% | East Asian | 99.7% |
| 2010 | FL | 2060 | 3.35 | Top 2% | Hispanic | 99.4% |
| 2010 | FL | 2050 | 3.53 | Unknown | Hispanic | 99.4% |
| 2010 | CA | 2040 | 3.25 | Top 2% | Hispanic | 99.3% |
| 2010 | FL | 2030 | 3.70 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 99.3% |
| 2010 | FL | 2020 | 3.70 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 99.2% |
| 2010 | FL | 2010 | 3.63 | Top 25% | Caucasian | 99.1% |
| 2010 | FL | 2000 | 3.80 | Top 15% | Caucasian | 99.7% |
| 2010 | FL | 1990 | 3.50 | Top 10% | East Asian | 99.7% |
| 2010 | FL | 1980 | 3.67 | Unknown | Caucasian | 99.5% |
| 2010 | FL | 1980 | 3.32 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 98.9% |
| 2010 | FL | 1970 | 2.98 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 98.8% |
| 2010 | RI | 1960 | 3.40 | Class Not Ranked | None Indicated | 98.7% |
| 2010 | FL | 1960 | 3.20 | Top 25% | Caucasian | 98.7% |
| 2010 | FL | 1950 | 3.82 | Top 3% | Caucasian | 98.6% |
| 2010 | FL | 1930 | 3.42 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 98.3% |
| 2010 | FL | 1920 | 3.90 | Top 4% | Caucasian | 99.1% |
| 2010 | FL | 1910 | 3.35 | Class Not Ranked | Hispanic | 98.6% |
| 2010 | NJ | 1910 | 3.25 | Top 40% | None Indicated | 98.1% |
| 2010 | FL | 1900 | 3.47 | Top 25% | African-American | 97.9% |
| 2010 | FL | 1880 | 3.18 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 97.7% |
| 2010 | FL | 1880 | 3.60 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 97.7% |
| 2010 | FL | 1880 | 3.73 | Top 20% | South Asian | 97.7% |
| 2010 | FL | 1870 | 3.56 | Top 15% | Caucasian | 97.7% |
| 2010 | FL | 1870 | 3.38 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 97.3% |
| 2010 | MD | 1870 | 3.57 | Top 30% | Caucasian | 97.3% |
| 2010 | FL | 1860 | 3.69 | Unknown | Caucasian | 99.1% |
| 2010 | FL | 1860 | 3.75 | Top 4% | Hispanic | 97.1% |
| 2010 | (Private) | 1850 | 3.90 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 97.7% |
| 2010 | FL | 1850 | 3.58 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 97.7% |
| 2010 | FL | 1840 | 3.09 | Unknown | Caucasian | 96.6% |
| 2010 | FL | 1830 | 3.46 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 99.1% |
| 2010 | FL | 1830 | 3.90 | Top 5% | East Asian | 96.4% |
| 2010 | NY | 1830 | 3.00 | Top 40% | Caucasian | 96.4% |
| 2010 | FL | 1820 | 3.52 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 96.4% |
| 2010 | FL | 1810 | 3.29 | Top 10% | African-American | 95.7% |
| 2010 | FL | 1800 | 3.90 | Top 10% | Hispanic | 97.7% |
| 2010 | NJ | 1800 | 3.45 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 95.4% |
| 2010 | FL | 1790 | 3.60 | Top 15% | Caucasian | 97.7% |
| 2010 | CT | 1790 | 3.50 | Top 3% | Caucasian | 96.4% |
| 2010 | NJ | 1790 | 3.75 | Top 10% | South Asian | 95.1% |
| 2010 | FL | 1790 | 3.80 | Unknown | Caucasian | 95.1% |
| 2010 | FL | 1780 | 3.88 | Top 10% | Hispanic | 94.6% |
| 2010 | FL | 1770 | 3.89 | Top 15% | Caucasian | 94.9% |
| 2010 | FL | 1770 | 3.94 | Class Not Ranked | Hispanic | 94.2% |
| 2010 | FL | 1770 | 3.50 | Unknown | African-American | 94.2% |
| 2010 | FL | 1770 | 3.03 | Top 40% | East Asian | 94.2% |
| 2010 | TX | 1750 | 3.40 | Top 25% | Caucasian | 93.2% |
| 2010 | FM | 1730 | 3.78 | Top 25% | Caucasian | 92.3% |
| 2010 | FL | 1720 | 3.34 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 99.1% |
| 2010 | FL | 1720 | 3.50 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 97.7% |
| 2010 | FL | 1720 | 3.70 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 91.5% |
| 2010 | FL | 1700 | 3.69 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 94.9% |
| 2010 | FL | 1700 | 3.00 | Top 35% | Caucasian | 90.3% |
| 2010 | FL | 1680 | 3.70 | Top 15% | Hispanic | 91.9% |
| 2010 | FL | 1670 | 3.90 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 96.4% |
| 2010 | (Private) | 1640 | 3.85 | Top 3% | Caucasian | 96.4% |
| 2010 | FL | 1640 | 3.20 | Top 30% | Caucasian | 94.9% |
| 2010 | FL | 1640 | 3.56 | Top 10% | Hispanic | 87.5% |
| 2010 | FL | 1570 | 3.90 | Top 2% | Hispanic | 76.2% |
| 2010 | FL | 1530 | 3.35 | Unknown | African-American | 81.1% |
| 2010 | FL | 1350 | 3.00 | Top 40% | African-American | 37.9% |
| 2010 | FL | 33 | 3.60 | Top 10% | Native American | 99.8% |
| 2010 | FL | 32 | 3.50 | Top 3% | Caucasian | 99.7% |
| 2010 | FL | 30 | 3.33 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 99.1% |
| 2010 | FL | 30 | 3.70 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 99.1% |
| 2010 | FL | 29 | 3.67 | Top 10% | None Indicated | 98.6% |
| 2010 | FL | 29 | 3.80 | Top 3% | Caucasian | 98.6% |
| 2010 | FL | 28 | 3.60 | Top 10% | Hispanic | 97.7% |
| 2010 | FL | 27 | 3.47 | Top 1% | Hispanic | 96.4% |
| 2010 | WV | 25 | 3.69 | Top 15% | Caucasian | 91.9% |
| 2010 | IL | 24 | 3.42 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 87.5% |
| 2009 | FL | 2350 | 4.00 | Top 1% | Hispanic | 99.9% |
| 2009 | FL | 2210 | 3.70 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 99.8% |
| 2009 | FL | 2210 | 4.00 | Valedictorian | Caucasian | 99.8% |
| 2009 | FL | 2190 | 3.20 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 99.8% |
| 2009 | FL | 2170 | 3.90 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 99.8% |
| 2009 | FL | 2140 | 3.90 | Salutatorian | Caucasian | 99.7% |
| 2009 | FL | 2110 | 4.00 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 99.7% |
| 2009 | FL | 2110 | 4.00 | Top 1% | Caucasian | 99.7% |
| 2009 | FL | 2110 | 4.00 | Top 1% | Caucasian | 99.6% |
| 2009 | FL | 2110 | 3.79 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 99.6% |
| 2009 | FL | 2110 | 4.00 | Top 1% | Caucasian | 99.6% |
| 2009 | FL | 2100 | 3.70 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 99.6% |
| 2009 | NJ | 2060 | 3.80 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 99.4% |
| 2009 | FL | 2060 | 3.60 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 99.4% |
| 2009 | FL | 2040 | 4.00 | Valedictorian | Caucasian | 99.9% |
| 2009 | FL | 2030 | 3.80 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 99.7% |
| 2009 | FL | 2030 | 3.48 | Top 10% | African-American | 99.5% |
| 2009 | FL | 2020 | 3.70 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 99.2% |
| 2009 | (Private) | 2000 | 3.15 | Top 20% | Hispanic | 99.1% |
| 2009 | FL | 1980 | 3.90 | Unknown | None Indicated | 98.9% |
| 2009 | FL | 1970 | 3.20 | Top 40% | Caucasian | 99.1% |
| 2009 | FL | 1960 | 3.50 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 99.7% |
| 2009 | FL | 1960 | 3.40 | Unknown | Caucasian | 98.7% |
| 2009 | FL | 1950 | 3.60 | Top 10% | East Asian | 98.6% |
| 2009 | FL | 1930 | 3.50 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 98.6% |
| 2009 | FL | 1930 | 3.50 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 98.3% |
| 2009 | FL | 1920 | 3.13 | Top 20% | Hispanic | 98.2% |
| 2009 | FL | 1920 | 3.48 | Top 20% | Hispanic | 98.2% |
| 2009 | FL | 1910 | 3.86 | Top 5% | Hispanic | 98.1% |
| 2009 | FL | 1890 | 3.80 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 97.7% |
| 2009 | FL | 1890 | 3.70 | Top 10% | East Asian | 97.7% |
| 2009 | FL | 1870 | 3.80 | Top 1% | Hispanic | 98.6% |
| 2009 | FL | 1870 | 3.70 | Top 5% | East Asian | 97.3% |
| 2009 | FL | 1870 | 4.00 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 97.3% |
| 2009 | FL | 1860 | 3.10 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 97.1% |
| 2009 | FL | 1860 | 3.66 | Top 5% | Hispanic | 97.1% |
| 2009 | FL | 1850 | 3.40 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 96.9% |
| 2009 | FL | 1840 | 3.40 | Top 30% | African-American | 99.5% |
| 2009 | FL | 1840 | 3.20 | Unknown | Caucasian | 96.6% |
| 2009 | FL | 1840 | 3.20 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 96.6% |
| 2009 | FL | 1800 | 3.92 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 96.4% |
| 2009 | FL | 1780 | 3.70 | Unknown | Caucasian | 94.9% |
| 2009 | FL | 1760 | 3.80 | Unknown | Caucasian | 94.9% |
| 2009 | FL | 1760 | 3.60 | Top 30% | African-American | 93.8% |
| 2009 | FL | 1750 | 3.70 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 93.2% |
| 2009 | FL | 1750 | 3.70 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 93.2% |
| 2009 | PA | 1730 | 3.50 | Top 30% | Caucasian | 92.3% |
| 2009 | FL | 1720 | 3.78 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 91.5% |
| 2009 | (Private) | 1710 | 2.99 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 91.0% |
| 2009 | FL | 1700 | 3.00 | Top 5% | Hispanic | 94.9% |
| 2009 | FL | 1700 | 3.65 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 90.3% |
| 2009 | FL | 1690 | 3.20 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 89.5% |
| 2009 | FL | 1680 | 3.90 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 91.9% |
| 2009 | FL | 1680 | 3.20 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 91.9% |
| 2009 | FL | 1670 | 3.46 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 94.9% |
| 2009 | FL | 1670 | 3.55 | Top 5% | Hispanic | 88.0% |
| 2009 | FL | 1610 | 3.00 | Top 40% | African-American | 81.8% |
| 2009 | FL | 1560 | 3.20 | Bottom 50% | East Asian | 74.8% |
| 2009 | FL | 1500 | 3.12 | Top 25% | Caucasian | 64.6% |
| 2009 | FL | 1370 | 3.90 | Top 1% | Middle-Eastern | 99.4% |
| 2009 | FL | 1120 | 3.55 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 97.7% |
| 2009 | NV | 30 | 3.15 | Top 20% | African-American | 99.1% |
| 2009 | OH | 28 | 3.92 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 97.7% |
| 2009 | FL | 27 | 4.00 | Unknown | South Asian | 96.4% |
| 2009 | FL | 26 | 4.00 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 94.9% |
| 2009 | FL | 24 | 3.40 | Top 30% | Caucasian | 87.5% |
| 2008 | FL | 2140 | 3.93 | Top 1% | None Indicated | 99.7% |
| 2008 | FL | 2040 | 3.30 | Bottom 50% | Hispanic | 99.3% |
| 2008 | FL | 2030 | 3.30 | Unknown | Hispanic | 99.3% |
| 2008 | FL | 1970 | 3.80 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 98.8% |
| 2008 | FL | 1950 | 3.40 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 99.1% |
| 2008 | FL | 1910 | 3.50 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 98.1% |
| 2008 | FL | 1900 | 3.20 | Top 20% | South Asian | 97.9% |
| 2008 | (Private) | 1890 | 3.65 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 97.7% |
| 2008 | FL | 1840 | 3.67 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 96.6% |
| 2008 | FL | 1820 | 3.90 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 96.1% |
| 2008 | FL | 1740 | 3.60 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 94.9% |
| 2008 | FL | 1690 | 3.10 | Top 30% | African-American | 89.5% |
| 2008 | FL | 1680 | 3.50 | Unknown | Caucasian | 91.9% |
| 2008 | FL | 1610 | 3.95 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 91.9% |
| 2008 | VA | 1610 | 3.00 | Class Not Ranked | South Asian | 81.8% |
| 2008 | FL | 1590 | 3.20 | Unknown | Hispanic | 79.1% |
| 2008 | FL | 1570 | 3.50 | Unknown | Caucasian | 91.9% |
| 2008 | FL | 1490 | 3.86 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 99.9% |
| 2008 | FL | 1320 | 3.50 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 98.9% |
| 2007 | FL | 2010 | 3.70 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 99.1% |
| 2007 | FL | 1500 | 3.10 | Top 40% | Hispanic | 81.1% |
| 2007 | FL | 1360 | 3.70 | Unknown | None Indicated | 99.3% |
| 2007 | FL | 29 | 2.90 | Unknown | Caucasian | 98.6% |
| 2006 | FL | 1850 | 3.73 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 96.9% |
| 2002 | (Private) | 2150 | 2.60 | Bottom 50% | Native American | 99.7% |
|
|
| 2010 | FL | 1600 | 3.78 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 80.3% |
| 2010 | FL | 1520 | 3.91 | Top 5% | South Asian | 68.4% |
| 2010 | FL | 1400 | 3.03 | Top 25% | Other | 49.8% |
| 2010 | FL | 1300 | 2.85 | Top 25% | African-American | 37.9% |
| 2010 | FL | 1300 | 2.70 | Top 25% | African-American | 27.3% |
| 2009 | FL | 1850 | 3.54 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 96.9% |
| 2008 | NY | 1590 | 3.30 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 79.1% |
| 2008 | FL | 1470 | 3.30 | Top 30% | Caucasian | 72.5% |
| 2008 | NY | 1470 | 3.25 | Bottom 50% | Caucasian | 58.9% |
| 2008 | FL | 23 | 2.98 | Unknown | Other | 81.1% |
| |