United States Naval Academy Applications and Decisions
Below is a list of applicants who have demonstrated interest in United States Naval Academy. Our best formula
for this college is based on
16 members who were accepted or rejected. The formula
has a college admissions prediction accuracy of
88%?.
Because not all members have filled out the most recent version of our survey, some predictions are made based on
less-accurate models. Those are noted with an asterisk (*) next to their prediction.
|
| 2010 | TX | 1840 | 3.80 | Top 3% | African-American | 100.0% |
| 2010 | NY | 1740 | 3.32 | Class Not Ranked | African-American | 86.2% |
| 2009 | MA | 2270 | 4.00 | Salutatorian | Caucasian | 100.0% |
| 2008 | MD | 2070 | 3.81 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 69.1% |
| 2008 | CA | 2040 | 3.85 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 100.0% |
|
| 2010 | FL | 2160 | 4.00 | Valedictorian | Caucasian | 100.0% |
| 2010 | MD | 2090 | 4.00 | Top 2% | Caucasian | 98.8% |
| 2010 | NV | 2030 | 3.70 | Top 2% | Caucasian | 100.0% |
| 2010 | CA | 1950 | 3.64 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 100.0% |
| 2010 | MD | 1790 | 3.83 | Top 5% | South Asian | 1.3% |
| 2010 | VA | 31 | 3.85 | Top 10% | South Asian | 100.0% |
| 2009 | CA | 2220 | 3.50 | Top 4% | East Asian | 100.0% |
| 2009 | MD | 2170 | 4.00 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 98.7% |
| 2009 | WI | 2130 | 3.80 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 100.0% |
| 2009 | PA | 1930 | 3.15 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 99.4% |
| 2009 | VA | 1840 | 3.10 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 98.7% |
| 2009 | IN | 1840 | 4.00 | Valedictorian | Caucasian | 100.0% |
| 2009 | FL | 1810 | 3.90 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 35.5% |
| 2009 | (Private) | 33 | 3.97 | Top 1% | None Indicated | 100.0% |
| 2009 | NY | 25 | 3.78 | Top 1% | East Asian | 99.9% |
| 2007 | ME | 1980 | 3.90 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 100.0% |
|
|
| 2010 | MD | 2120 | 3.63 | Top 40% | Caucasian | 0.0% |
| 2009 | NJ | 2070 | 2.90 | Top 40% | East Asian | 3.1% |
| 2009 | MD | 1910 | 3.95 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 14.6% |
| 2009 | VA | 1860 | 3.90 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 62.9% |
|
| 2011 | OK | 2090 | 3.91 | Top 1% | Caucasian | 100.0% |
| 2011 | OK | 2090 | 3.89 | Unknown | Caucasian | 100.0% |
| 2011 | IN | 2060 | 3.50 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 100.0% |
| 2010 | MN | 2260 | 4.00 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 100.0% |
| 2010 | MD | 2200 | 3.90 | Top 10% | Hispanic | 90.4% |
| 2010 | PA | 2140 | 4.00 | Valedictorian | Caucasian | 100.0% |
| 2010 | FL | 2070 | 3.20 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 100.0% |
| 2010 | MD | 2050 | 3.50 | Top 25% | Caucasian | 0.2% |
| 2010 | (Private) | 2050 | 3.63 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 100.0% |
| 2010 | TX | 2040 | 3.80 | Class Not Ranked | Hispanic | 99.9% |
| 2010 | MD | 2040 | 3.52 | Top 25% | Caucasian | 0.0% |
| 2010 | NC | 1960 | 4.00 | Valedictorian | Caucasian | 100.0% |
| 2010 | TX | 1940 | 3.50 | Top 25% | Hispanic | 57.7% |
| 2010 | AL | 1850 | 3.90 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 97.3% |
| 2010 | NC | 1850 | 3.70 | Top 15% | Caucasian | 94.9% |
| 2010 | OH | 1810 | 3.90 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 99.9% |
| 2010 | NV | 1790 | 3.85 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 97.9% |
| 2010 | FL | 32 | 3.85 | Top 15% | Caucasian | 100.0% |
| 2010 | IL | 30 | 3.89 | Top 1% | Caucasian | 100.0% |
| 2010 | VA | 29 | 3.75 | Top 3% | None Indicated | 100.0% |
| 2010 | MI | 26 | 3.68 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 99.8% |
| 2010 | NJ | 24 | 3.65 | Top 15% | Hispanic | 24.3% |
| 2009 | TX | 1800 | 3.30 | Top 20% | Hispanic | 44.8% |
| 2009 | CA | 1660 | 3.85 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 2.1% |
| 2009 | (Private) | 1160 | 3.50 | Top 20% | None Indicated | 15.1% |
| 2008 | OR | 2020 | 3.96 | Unknown | Caucasian | 99.8% |
|
| 2012 | NC | 2080 | 3.95 | Top 3% | Caucasian | 100.0% |
| 2012 | NJ | 1940 | 3.90 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 99.9% |
| 2012 | CA | 1800 | 4.00 | Top 5% | Native American | 99.8% |
| 2012 | IA | 32 | 4.00 | Top 3% | Caucasian | 100.0% |
| 2011 | MD | 2260 | 3.80 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 97.8% |
| 2011 | MO | 2190 | 3.90 | Top 15% | Caucasian | 100.0% |
| 2011 | OK | 2150 | 3.89 | Top 2% | Caucasian | 100.0% |
| 2011 | OH | 2070 | 3.86 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 100.0% |
| 2011 | FL | 2060 | 4.00 | Top 1% | Hispanic | 100.0% |
| 2011 | NJ | 2040 | 3.56 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 100.0% |
| 2011 | TX | 2030 | 3.85 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 100.0% |
| 2011 | VA | 2030 | 4.00 | Top 1% | Caucasian | 100.0% |
| 2011 | TX | 1940 | 3.50 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 100.0% |
| 2011 | NJ | 1920 | 3.60 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 98.9% |
| 2011 | CA | 1900 | 3.94 | Top 3% | Caucasian | 100.0% |
| 2011 | PA | 1890 | 3.80 | Top 3% | Caucasian | 100.0% |
| 2011 | FL | 1870 | 3.80 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 100.0% |
| 2011 | NJ | 1870 | 3.70 | Class Not Ranked | East Asian | 96.5% |
| 2011 | CA | 1860 | 3.39 | Top 25% | Caucasian | 20.3% |
| 2011 | NJ | 1830 | 3.70 | Unknown | Hispanic | 99.4% |
| 2011 | MA | 1830 | 3.40 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 94.0% |
| 2011 | OH | 1750 | 3.87 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 78.5% |
| 2011 | FL | 1670 | 3.67 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 100.0% |
| 2011 | SC | 1660 | 3.00 | Top 30% | Native American | 19.8% |
| 2011 | MD | 1650 | 3.30 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 0.0% |
| 2011 | GA | 1620 | 3.20 | Top 25% | Hispanic | 0.2% |
| 2011 | IL | 32 | 3.85 | Top 2% | Caucasian | 100.0% |
| 2011 | UT | 32 | 3.95 | Top 4% | Hispanic | 100.0% |
| 2011 | NC | 31 | 2.49 | Top 4% | Caucasian | 100.0% |
| 2011 | TX | 25 | 3.30 | Bottom 50% | Caucasian | 0.0% |
| 2011 | WI | 24 | 3.93 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 96.7% |
| 2010 | VA | 2290 | 3.60 | Top 20% | East Asian | 100.0% |
| 2010 | NM | 2290 | 3.90 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 100.0% |
| 2010 | OH | 2180 | 3.60 | Top 30% | Hispanic | 95.8% |
| 2010 | IN | 2130 | 3.40 | Top 15% | Caucasian | 100.0% |
| 2010 | TX | 2120 | 4.00 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 100.0% |
| 2010 | MD | 2110 | 3.95 | Top 1% | Caucasian | 98.9% |
| 2010 | AL | 2100 | 3.90 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 100.0% |
| 2010 | VA | 2090 | 4.00 | Valedictorian | Caucasian | 100.0% |
| 2010 | (Private) | 2070 | 4.00 | Top 1% | Caucasian | 100.0% |
| 2010 | CT | 2070 | 3.61 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 100.0% |
| 2010 | OH | 2020 | 3.80 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 98.4% |
| 2010 | VA | 2020 | 3.26 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 99.1% |
| 2010 | NY | 2010 | 3.72 | Top 10% | African-American | 100.0% |
| 2010 | OH | 1980 | 3.20 | Bottom 50% | Caucasian | 0.0% |
| 2010 | FL | 1980 | 3.32 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 97.7% |
| 2010 | VA | 1970 | 3.89 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 100.0% |
| 2010 | CA | 1960 | 3.50 | Unknown | Caucasian | 99.6% |
| 2010 | FL | 1950 | 3.00 | Top 40% | Caucasian | 97.7% |
| 2010 | VA | 1910 | 3.00 | Bottom 50% | Hispanic | 0.0% |
| 2010 | IN | 1870 | 3.20 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 97.8% |
| 2010 | NJ | 1870 | 0.00 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 99.9% |
| 2010 | CA | 1860 | 3.50 | Top 15% | Caucasian | 96.5% |
| 2010 | NY | 1840 | 3.65 | Class Not Ranked | East Asian | 93.7% |
| 2010 | CA | 1830 | 3.80 | Top 10% | East Asian | 99.1% |
| 2010 | FL | 1830 | 3.30 | Top 20% | Hispanic | 61.1% |
| 2010 | CA | 1820 | 4.00 | Top 10% | Hispanic | 98.7% |
| 2010 | AZ | 1740 | 2.13 | Top 40% | Caucasian | 0.0% |
| 2010 | GA | 1710 | 3.54 | Top 30% | Hispanic | 3.7% |
| 2010 | NH | 1660 | 3.50 | Top 15% | Caucasian | 24.6% |
| 2010 | IL | 1590 | 3.45 | Top 20% | Other | 0.7% |
| 2010 | NC | 1480 | 4.00 | Top 1% | Caucasian | 75.4% |
| 2010 | CA | 1370 | 3.80 | Top 5% | Other | 4.8% |
| 2010 | IN | 34 | 3.83 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 100.0% |
| 2010 | MI | 34 | 3.90 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 100.0% |
| 2010 | (Private) | 31 | 3.40 | Top 30% | Caucasian | 70.3% |
| 2010 | MI | 31 | 3.86 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 100.0% |
| 2010 | VA | 31 | 3.70 | Class Not Ranked | East Asian | 100.0% |
| 2010 | MI | 31 | 3.75 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 100.0% |
| 2010 | OH | 31 | 3.90 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 100.0% |
| 2010 | MI | 30 | 3.42 | Top 25% | Caucasian | 87.1% |
| 2010 | CA | 30 | 3.83 | Top 10% | Other | 100.0% |
| 2010 | OH | 29 | 3.55 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 99.5% |
| 2010 | CA | 28 | 3.76 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 99.8% |
| 2010 | CO | 23 | 2.71 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 17.6% |
| 2009 | GA | 2140 | 3.80 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 100.0% |
| 2009 | (Private) | 2060 | 3.33 | Class Not Ranked | South Asian | 100.0% |
| 2009 | PA | 2050 | 3.20 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 100.0% |
| 2009 | AZ | 2000 | 3.40 | Top 10% | East Asian | 100.0% |
| 2009 | MD | 1970 | 3.75 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 64.8% |
| 2009 | MD | 1930 | 3.50 | Top 25% | Caucasian | 0.0% |
| 2009 | MD | 1920 | 4.00 | Top 1% | Caucasian | 57.3% |
| 2009 | GA | 1910 | 3.15 | Top 40% | East Asian | 0.1% |
| 2009 | CA | 1870 | 3.35 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 99.8% |
| 2009 | MD | 1860 | 3.70 | Top 20% | African-American | 0.0% |
| 2009 | VA | 1860 | 3.58 | Top 10% | East Asian | 99.6% |
| 2009 | FL | 1850 | 3.98 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 99.9% |
| 2009 | MA | 1800 | 3.50 | Top 20% | None Indicated | 98.6% |
| 2009 | VA | 1800 | 4.00 | Valedictorian | Caucasian | 100.0% |
| 2009 | CA | 1770 | 3.97 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 96.3% |
| 2009 | PA | 1770 | 3.49 | Top 30% | Caucasian | 0.3% |
| 2009 | PA | 1720 | 3.80 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 90.9% |
| 2009 | TN | 1700 | 4.00 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 97.0% |
| 2009 | MA | 32 | 3.75 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 100.0% |
| 2009 | IL | 31 | 3.18 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 100.0% |
| 2009 | CA | 30 | 3.60 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 100.0% |
| 2009 | OH | 23 | 3.55 | Bottom 50% | Caucasian | 0.0% |
| 2009 | IL | 23 | 3.40 | Top 30% | Caucasian | 0.0% |
| 2008 | CT | 2190 | 3.72 | Unknown | Caucasian | 100.0% |
| 2008 | VA | 2130 | 4.00 | Unknown | Caucasian | 100.0% |
| 2008 | MD | 2070 | 3.80 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 37.5% |
| 2008 | WA | 1900 | 4.00 | Top 1% | Caucasian | 100.0% |
| 2008 | NV | 1890 | 3.80 | Top 1% | Caucasian | 100.0% |
| 2008 | TX | 1800 | 3.52 | Top 20% | None Indicated | 55.9% |
| 2008 | FL | 1770 | 3.65 | Top 10% | Hispanic | 99.3% |
| 2008 | MI | 26 | 3.90 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 97.5% |
| 2007 | OK | 850 | 2.83 | Bottom 40% | Caucasian | 0.0% |
| |