United States Air Force Academy Applications and Decisions
Below is a list of applicants who have demonstrated interest in United States Air Force Academy. Our best formula for this college is based on members who were accepted or rejected. The formula has a college admissions prediction accuracy of %?. Because not all members have filled out the most recent version of our survey, some predictions are made based on less-accurate models. Those are noted with an asterisk (*) next to their prediction.
Recent Admissions Results from 167 Members |
|||||||
Member |
Year Entering |
State |
SAT/ACT |
GPA |
Class Rank |
Ethnic Heritage |
Prediction ? |
| Accepted And Attending (7) | |||||||
| 2010 | MD | 2120 | 3.63 | Top 40% | Caucasian | ||
| 2010 | PA | 2100 | 3.40 | Top 30% | Caucasian | ||
| 2010 | CA | 1980 | 3.60 | Top 10% | Other | ||
| 2010 | MI | 1640 | 3.80 | Top 4% | Caucasian | ||
| 2009 | NC | 2020 | 4.00 | Top 5% | Caucasian | ||
| 2009 | GA | 1910 | 3.15 | Top 40% | East Asian | ||
| 2009 | NY | 25 | 3.78 | Top 1% | East Asian | ||
| Accepted (10) | |||||||
| 2010 | CA | 2290 | 4.00 | Top 1% | Hispanic | ||
| 2010 | FL | 2190 | 3.80 | Top 3% | Caucasian | ||
| 2010 | TX | 2110 | 4.00 | Top 4% | Caucasian | ||
| 2010 | CA | 2090 | 3.94 | Top 5% | Caucasian | ||
| 2009 | CA | 2270 | 3.92 | Top 1% | Other | ||
| 2009 | FL | 1790 | 3.50 | Top 10% | Caucasian | ||
| 2009 | CA | 33 | 3.83 | Top 5% | East Asian | ||
| 2009 | NE | 31 | 4.00 | Valedictorian | Caucasian | ||
| 2008 | TN | 2260 | 3.90 | Top 5% | Caucasian | ||
| 2008 | IL | 2090 | 3.85 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | ||
| Denied Admission (3) | |||||||
| 2010 | AK | 2240 | 3.75 | Top 15% | Caucasian | ||
| 2010 | CA | 1650 | 3.50 | Top 15% | East Asian | ||
| 2009 | NJ | 2070 | 2.90 | Top 40% | East Asian | ||
| Applied (18) | |||||||
| 2011 | TX | 1540 | 3.60 | Bottom 50% | Caucasian | ||
| 2010 | MD | 2200 | 3.90 | Top 10% | Hispanic | ||
| 2010 | OH | 2120 | 3.78 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | ||
| 2010 | NV | 2030 | 3.70 | Top 2% | Caucasian | ||
| 2010 | TX | 2020 | 3.60 | Top 35% | Caucasian | ||
| 2010 | VA | 2020 | 3.26 | Top 20% | Caucasian | ||
| 2010 | CA | 2010 | 3.74 | Top 5% | East Asian | ||
| 2010 | NJ | 2000 | 3.37 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | ||
| 2010 | NC | 1850 | 3.70 | Top 15% | Caucasian | ||
| 2010 | MI | 26 | 3.68 | Top 5% | Caucasian | ||
| 2009 | IL | 2230 | 3.95 | Top 10% | East Asian | ||
| 2009 | AZ | 2030 | 3.50 | Top 10% | Caucasian | ||
| 2009 | (Private) | 1160 | 3.50 | Top 20% | None Indicated | ||
| 2009 | WI | 32 | 3.67 | Top 20% | Caucasian | ||
| 2008 | NY | 2370 | 3.93 | Class Not Ranked | East Asian | ||
| 2008 | CO | 1860 | 4.00 | Valedictorian | Caucasian | ||
| 2008 | CO | 1730 | 3.39 | Top 30% | Caucasian | ||
| 2008 | MI | 30 | 3.88 | Top 10% | Caucasian | ||
| Applying (129) | |||||||
| 2012 | MD | 2280 | 3.45 | Top 15% | Caucasian | ||
| 2012 | FL | 2060 | 3.50 | Top 10% | Caucasian | ||
| 2012 | KS | 2010 | 3.50 | Top 20% | Caucasian | ||
| 2012 | FL | 1940 | 3.10 | Top 25% | Caucasian | ||
| 2012 | KS | 1870 | 4.00 | Valedictorian | East Asian | ||
| 2012 | NJ | 1850 | 3.55 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | ||
| 2012 | CA | 1800 | 4.00 | Top 5% | Native American | ||
| 2012 | CO | 1700 | 3.20 | Unknown | Caucasian | ||
| 2012 | IA | 32 | 4.00 | Top 3% | Caucasian | ||
| 2011 | VA | 2390 | 4.00 | Valedictorian | Native American | ||
| 2011 | CA | 2260 | 3.94 | Class Not Ranked | South Asian | ||
| 2011 | TX | 2250 | 3.65 | Class Not Ranked | East Asian | ||
| 2011 | KY | 2240 | 4.00 | Top 1% | None Indicated | ||
| 2011 | MD | 2230 | 3.85 | Top 20% | Caucasian | ||
| 2011 | CA | 2200 | 4.00 | Top 1% | South Asian | ||
| 2011 | PA | 2110 | 4.00 | Top 1% | Caucasian | ||
| 2011 | VA | 2090 | 3.76 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | ||
| 2011 | IL | 2070 | 3.20 | Top 20% | Caucasian | ||
| 2011 | CA | 2070 | 4.00 | Top 5% | East Asian | ||
| 2011 | FL | 2060 | 4.00 | Top 1% | Hispanic | ||
| 2011 | FL | 2060 | 4.00 | Valedictorian | Caucasian | ||
| 2011 | FL | 2060 | 4.00 | Top 1% | Hispanic | ||
| 2011 | TX | 2040 | 4.00 | Top 10% | Caucasian | ||
| 2011 | CA | 2010 | 3.20 | Bottom 40% | East Asian | ||
| 2011 | FL | 2000 | 3.30 | Top 10% | Hispanic | ||
| 2011 | CA | 1970 | 3.70 | Top 30% | East Asian | ||
| 2011 | NY | 1940 | 3.39 | Top 25% | Caucasian | ||
| 2011 | PA | 1890 | 3.80 | Top 3% | Caucasian | ||
| 2011 | FL | 1870 | 3.80 | Top 5% | Caucasian | ||
| 2011 | PA | 1850 | 3.30 | Unknown | Caucasian | ||
| 2011 | FL | 1840 | 3.90 | Top 5% | Caucasian | ||
| 2011 | CA | 1840 | 3.50 | Unknown | Caucasian | ||
| 2011 | MD | 1830 | 3.85 | Top 15% | Caucasian | ||
| 2011 | GA | 1790 | 4.00 | Top 4% | Caucasian | ||
| 2011 | MA | 1780 | 3.00 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | ||
| 2011 | PA | 1770 | 3.70 | Top 10% | Caucasian | ||
| 2011 | NJ | 1680 | 3.60 | Top 30% | Caucasian | ||
| 2011 | TX | 1680 | 3.90 | Top 10% | Caucasian | ||
| 2011 | FL | 1670 | 3.67 | Top 10% | Caucasian | ||
| 2011 | SC | 1660 | 3.00 | Top 30% | Native American | ||
| 2011 | MD | 1650 | 3.30 | Top 20% | Caucasian | ||
| 2011 | CA | 1600 | 3.00 | Unknown | Caucasian | ||
| 2011 | XX | 1550 | 3.44 | Bottom 50% | Caucasian | ||
| 2011 | NY | 1200 | 3.20 | Bottom 50% | Caucasian | ||
| 2011 | MO | 33 | 3.76 | Top 15% | Caucasian | ||
| 2011 | UT | 32 | 3.95 | Top 4% | Hispanic | ||
| 2011 | MN | 32 | 4.00 | Top 1% | Caucasian | ||
| 2011 | CO | 31 | 3.95 | Top 10% | Native American | ||
| 2011 | AA | 31 | 2.94 | Top 4% | Caucasian | ||
| 2011 | IL | 30 | 3.80 | Top 4% | Caucasian | ||
| 2011 | CO | 28 | 3.95 | Top 10% | Native American | ||
| 2011 | MS | 27 | 4.00 | Class Not Ranked | East Asian | ||
| 2011 | NY | 25 | 4.00 | Top 10% | Caucasian | ||
| 2011 | NM | 25 | 3.90 | Top 10% | Caucasian | ||
| 2011 | TX | 25 | 3.30 | Bottom 50% | Caucasian | ||
| 2011 | WI | 24 | 3.93 | Top 5% | Caucasian | ||
| 2010 | VA | 2290 | 3.60 | Top 20% | East Asian | ||
| 2010 | NM | 2290 | 3.90 | Top 5% | Caucasian | ||
| 2010 | FL | 2160 | 3.70 | Top 5% | Caucasian | ||
| 2010 | OH | 2140 | 4.00 | Valedictorian | East Asian | ||
| 2010 | CO | 2120 | 3.96 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | ||
| 2010 | TX | 2110 | 3.96 | Top 5% | Caucasian | ||
| 2010 | CA | 2080 | 3.54 | Top 30% | South Asian | ||
| 2010 | GA | 2030 | 3.60 | Top 20% | Caucasian | ||
| 2010 | MD | 1990 | 4.00 | Salutatorian | Hispanic | ||
| 2010 | OH | 1980 | 3.20 | Bottom 50% | Caucasian | ||
| 2010 | FL | 1980 | 3.32 | Top 20% | Caucasian | ||
| 2010 | CA | 1960 | 3.50 | Unknown | Caucasian | ||
| 2010 | NC | 1960 | 4.00 | Valedictorian | Caucasian | ||
| 2010 | FL | 1950 | 3.00 | Top 40% | Caucasian | ||
| 2010 | FL | 1930 | 3.52 | Top 10% | Other | ||
| 2010 | CT | 1920 | 3.30 | Top 20% | East Asian | ||
| 2010 | VA | 1910 | 3.00 | Bottom 50% | Hispanic | ||
| 2010 | NV | 1900 | 3.87 | Top 5% | Caucasian | ||
| 2010 | NJ | 1900 | 3.30 | Top 30% | African-American | ||
| 2010 | VA | 1890 | 3.50 | Top 20% | Caucasian | ||
| 2010 | CA | 1890 | 3.47 | Top 10% | Caucasian | ||
| 2010 | VA | 1870 | 3.30 | Top 30% | Caucasian | ||
| 2010 | CA | 1870 | 3.50 | Top 20% | South Asian | ||
| 2010 | FL | 1860 | 3.60 | Top 10% | Caucasian | ||
| 2010 | CA | 1860 | 3.50 | Top 15% | Caucasian | ||
| 2010 | NY | 1850 | 3.90 | Top 10% | Caucasian | ||
| 2010 | CA | 1830 | 3.80 | Top 10% | East Asian | ||
| 2010 | FL | 1830 | 3.30 | Top 20% | Hispanic | ||
| 2010 | CA | 1820 | 4.00 | Top 10% | Hispanic | ||
| 2010 | MD | 1790 | 3.83 | Top 5% | South Asian | ||
| 2010 | AZ | 1740 | 2.13 | Top 40% | Caucasian | ||
| 2010 | TX | 1700 | 3.65 | Top 40% | Hispanic | ||
| 2010 | TX | 1700 | 3.80 | Top 10% | East Asian | ||
| 2010 | WA | 1700 | 3.30 | Top 30% | East Asian | ||
| 2010 | CA | 1690 | 2.70 | Unknown | South Asian | ||
| 2010 | NH | 1660 | 3.50 | Top 15% | Caucasian | ||
| 2010 | NY | 1650 | 3.20 | Top 25% | None Indicated | ||
| 2010 | NY | 1650 | 3.00 | Top 25% | Caucasian | ||
| 2010 | TX | 1590 | 3.33 | Top 20% | Hispanic | ||
| 2010 | CA | 1560 | 3.33 | Top 30% | Caucasian | ||
| 2010 | FL | 1420 | 3.05 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | ||
| 2010 | MI | 34 | 3.90 | Top 10% | Caucasian | ||
| 2010 | KS | 33 | 4.00 | Valedictorian | Caucasian | ||
| 2010 | MI | 32 | 3.90 | Top 10% | Caucasian | ||
| 2010 | VA | 31 | 3.70 | Class Not Ranked | East Asian | ||
| 2010 | CA | 30 | 3.83 | Top 10% | Other | ||
| 2010 | WI | 30 | 4.00 | Valedictorian | Caucasian | ||
| 2010 | OH | 29 | 3.55 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | ||
| 2010 | SC | 29 | 3.60 | Top 1% | Caucasian | ||
| 2010 | IL | 29 | 3.20 | Unknown | Caucasian | ||
| 2010 | IL | 27 | 2.40 | Top 40% | Caucasian | ||
| 2009 | GA | 2140 | 3.80 | Top 5% | Caucasian | ||
| 2009 | CA | 2130 | 3.69 | Top 10% | Caucasian | ||
| 2009 | CA | 2090 | 4.00 | Top 1% | East Asian | ||
| 2009 | GA | 1960 | 3.80 | Unknown | None Indicated | ||
| 2009 | MD | 1930 | 3.50 | Top 25% | Caucasian | ||
| 2009 | MD | 1920 | 4.00 | Top 1% | Caucasian | ||
| 2009 | CA | 1870 | 3.35 | Top 10% | Caucasian | ||
| 2009 | CA | 1770 | 3.97 | Top 10% | Caucasian | ||
| 2009 | MA | 32 | 3.75 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | ||
| 2009 | TN | 30 | 3.93 | Top 30% | Caucasian | ||
| 2009 | OH | 23 | 3.55 | Bottom 50% | Caucasian | ||
| 2008 | CA | 2250 | 3.11 | Bottom 50% | East Asian | ||
| 2008 | (Private) | 2220 | 3.70 | Class Not Ranked | African-American | ||
| 2008 | OK | 2130 | 4.00 | Top 1% | Caucasian | ||
| 2008 | CA | 2100 | 3.40 | Top 20% | Caucasian | ||
| 2008 | WA | 1900 | 4.00 | Top 1% | Caucasian | ||
| 2008 | TX | 1800 | 3.52 | Top 20% | None Indicated | ||
| 2008 | SC | 1750 | 3.90 | Top 5% | Caucasian | ||
| 2008 | WI | 32 | 3.92 | Top 5% | Caucasian | ||
| 2007 | NY | 2030 | 3.10 | Top 20% | Other | ||
| 2007 | WA | 1930 | 3.80 | Top 10% | Caucasian | ||
| 2007 | OK | 850 | 2.83 | Bottom 40% | Caucasian | ||
