Tulane University Applications and Decisions
Below is a list of applicants who have demonstrated interest in Tulane University. Our best formula
for this college is based on
266 members who were accepted or rejected. The formula
has a college admissions prediction accuracy of
96%?.
Because not all members have filled out the most recent version of our survey, some predictions are made based on
less-accurate models. Those are noted with an asterisk (*) next to their prediction.
This is a very popular school, and you're looking at the whole list. If you
would like to only see completed applications,
click here for a smaller version of this page.
|
| 2009 | TX | 2130 | 3.73 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 98.9% |
| 2009 | CA | 2070 | 3.61 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 97.6% |
| 2009 | MD | 2060 | 3.71 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 98.1% |
| 2009 | (Private) | 2010 | 3.60 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 96.0% |
| 2009 | ID | 2000 | 3.78 | Top 25% | None Indicated | 97.7% |
| 2009 | LA | 1860 | 3.50 | Class Not Ranked | Other | 84.0% |
| 2009 | LA | 34 | 4.00 | Valedictorian | African-American | 99.8% |
| 2009 | NY | 31 | 3.80 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 98.6% |
| 2009 | VA | 30 | 3.68 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 96.8% |
| 2008 | VA | 2290 | 3.35 | Class Not Ranked | East Asian | 99.0% |
| 2008 | MN | 2200 | 3.65 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 99.2% |
| 2008 | FL | 2130 | 3.80 | Top 5% | None Indicated | 99.5% |
| 2008 | CA | 2010 | 3.20 | Unknown | Caucasian | 87.2% |
| 2008 | IN | 32 | 3.75 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 99.0% |
| 2007 | CO | 2060 | 3.40 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 95.0% |
|
| 2011 | VA | 2010 | 3.90 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 98.4% |
| 2011 | PA | 1930 | 3.50 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 90.1% |
| 2010 | CO | 2370 | 3.90 | Class Not Ranked | East Asian | 99.9% |
| 2010 | (Private) | 2350 | 3.40 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 99.5% |
| 2010 | KS | 2340 | 3.55 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 99.7% |
| 2010 | MA | 2340 | 4.00 | Top 1% | Caucasian | 99.9% |
| 2010 | VA | 2330 | 3.70 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 99.8% |
| 2010 | FL | 2320 | 3.94 | Valedictorian | Caucasian | 99.9% |
| 2010 | CA | 2320 | 3.67 | Top 10% | South Asian | 99.7% |
| 2010 | VA | 2310 | 4.00 | Top 4% | African-American | 99.9% |
| 2010 | FL | 2310 | 3.49 | Top 10% | Hispanic | 99.5% |
| 2010 | NJ | 2310 | 3.81 | Class Not Ranked | South Asian | 99.8% |
| 2010 | (Private) | 2300 | 3.70 | Top 15% | East Asian | 99.7% |
| 2010 | NY | 2300 | 3.89 | Unknown | East Asian | 99.8% |
| 2010 | MD | 2280 | 4.00 | Top 2% | Caucasian | 99.9% |
| 2010 | (Private) | 2280 | 4.00 | Top 2% | Caucasian | 99.9% |
| 2010 | CA | 2270 | 3.80 | Class Not Ranked | None Indicated | 99.8% |
| 2010 | FL | 2270 | 3.72 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 99.6% |
| 2010 | MT | 2270 | 3.91 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 99.8% |
| 2010 | MA | 2270 | 3.20 | Unknown | Caucasian | 98.2% |
| 2010 | PA | 2270 | 4.00 | Valedictorian | Caucasian | 99.9% |
| 2010 | NY | 2250 | 4.00 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 99.8% |
| 2010 | PA | 2240 | 3.76 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 99.6% |
| 2010 | GA | 2230 | 3.80 | Top 10% | South Asian | 99.6% |
| 2010 | CT | 2230 | 3.76 | Top 1% | East Asian | 99.6% |
| 2010 | CT | 2210 | 3.20 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 99.0% |
| 2010 | IL | 2200 | 3.10 | Top 30% | Caucasian | 98.6% |
| 2010 | NY | 2200 | 3.70 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 99.3% |
| 2010 | PA | 2200 | 3.92 | Top 1% | Other | 99.7% |
| 2010 | OH | 2200 | 3.70 | Class Not Ranked | Other | 99.3% |
| 2010 | VA | 2200 | 3.84 | Top 2% | Caucasian | 99.6% |
| 2010 | TN | 2190 | 3.95 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 99.7% |
| 2010 | CA | 2180 | 3.87 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 99.6% |
| 2010 | MD | 2180 | 3.75 | Top 5% | East Asian | 99.3% |
| 2010 | MA | 2170 | 3.12 | Top 10% | None Indicated | 95.0% |
| 2010 | FL | 2170 | 3.80 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 99.4% |
| 2010 | FL | 2160 | 4.00 | Valedictorian | Caucasian | 99.8% |
| 2010 | FL | 2160 | 3.77 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 99.4% |
| 2010 | MD | 2160 | 4.00 | Top 2% | Caucasian | 99.6% |
| 2010 | CA | 2160 | 3.43 | Top 40% | East Asian | 97.9% |
| 2010 | OH | 2160 | 4.00 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 99.6% |
| 2010 | NY | 2150 | 3.90 | Top 10% | Hispanic | 99.5% |
| 2010 | CA | 2150 | 3.40 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 97.5% |
| 2010 | TX | 2140 | 3.82 | Top 3% | East Asian | 99.3% |
| 2010 | AZ | 2140 | 4.00 | Top 1% | None Indicated | 99.6% |
| 2010 | PA | 2140 | 3.50 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 98.0% |
| 2010 | CO | 2130 | 3.95 | Top 4% | Other | 99.5% |
| 2010 | (Private) | 2130 | 3.87 | Top 10% | None Indicated | 99.3% |
| 2010 | VA | 2130 | 3.50 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 97.9% |
| 2010 | (Private) | 2120 | 4.00 | Top 2% | Caucasian | 99.9% |
| 2010 | OH | 2120 | 3.95 | Top 1% | Caucasian | 99.8% |
| 2010 | SC | 2120 | 4.00 | Top 2% | Caucasian | 99.5% |
| 2010 | GA | 2120 | 3.65 | Top 15% | Caucasian | 98.6% |
| 2010 | OR | 2120 | 3.88 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 99.3% |
| 2010 | CA | 2120 | 3.69 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 98.7% |
| 2010 | FL | 2110 | 3.90 | Top 2% | Caucasian | 99.4% |
| 2010 | GA | 2110 | 4.00 | Top 1% | Caucasian | 99.5% |
| 2010 | VA | 2110 | 3.93 | Top 4% | Caucasian | 99.3% |
| 2010 | CA | 2110 | 3.46 | Unknown | Caucasian | 97.1% |
| 2010 | FL | 2110 | 3.89 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 99.2% |
| 2010 | NJ | 2110 | 3.74 | Top 10% | African-American | 98.8% |
| 2010 | NY | 2100 | 3.60 | Class Not Ranked | East Asian | 99.0% |
| 2010 | IN | 2100 | 4.00 | Valedictorian | East Asian | 99.7% |
| 2010 | MA | 2100 | 3.48 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 97.1% |
| 2010 | TX | 2100 | 3.50 | Top 20% | South Asian | 97.3% |
| 2010 | NJ | 2100 | 3.80 | Top 2% | East Asian | 98.9% |
| 2010 | MA | 2100 | 3.42 | Top 20% | None Indicated | 96.5% |
| 2010 | UT | 2090 | 3.82 | Top 15% | Caucasian | 99.2% |
| 2010 | (Private) | 2090 | 3.20 | Class Not Ranked | Hispanic | 92.9% |
| 2010 | IN | 2090 | 4.00 | Valedictorian | Caucasian | 99.4% |
| 2010 | FL | 2090 | 3.80 | Top 3% | Hispanic | 98.8% |
| 2010 | ME | 2090 | 3.84 | Top 3% | None Indicated | 99.0% |
| 2010 | VA | 2080 | 4.00 | Valedictorian | Caucasian | 99.9% |
| 2010 | TX | 2080 | 4.00 | Top 2% | Hispanic | 99.3% |
| 2010 | TX | 2080 | 3.90 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 99.1% |
| 2010 | NH | 2080 | 3.83 | Top 4% | Caucasian | 98.8% |
| 2010 | NC | 2080 | 3.90 | Salutatorian | Caucasian | 99.1% |
| 2010 | FL | 2070 | 3.90 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 99.4% |
| 2010 | VA | 2070 | 3.75 | Class Not Ranked | None Indicated | 98.4% |
| 2010 | TX | 2070 | 3.70 | Top 3% | South Asian | 98.1% |
| 2010 | CT | 2070 | 3.48 | Class Not Ranked | Hispanic | 96.4% |
| 2010 | VA | 2070 | 3.90 | Top 5% | East Asian | 99.0% |
| 2010 | NY | 2060 | 3.84 | Top 4% | Caucasian | 99.3% |
| 2010 | NC | 2060 | 3.75 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 98.3% |
| 2010 | NJ | 2050 | 4.00 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 99.1% |
| 2010 | TX | 2050 | 3.91 | Top 25% | Caucasian | 98.9% |
| 2010 | MA | 2040 | 3.60 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 96.8% |
| 2010 | TX | 2040 | 3.80 | Class Not Ranked | Hispanic | 98.3% |
| 2010 | NJ | 2030 | 3.73 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 97.7% |
| 2010 | OK | 2030 | 3.66 | Class Not Ranked | Native American | 97.2% |
| 2010 | FL | 2030 | 3.70 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 97.5% |
| 2010 | NH | 2030 | 3.60 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 96.6% |
| 2010 | MD | 2030 | 4.00 | Top 5% | East Asian | 99.0% |
| 2010 | NY | 2030 | 3.67 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 97.2% |
| 2010 | TX | 2020 | 3.55 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 95.6% |
| 2010 | FL | 2020 | 3.50 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 94.9% |
| 2010 | NY | 2020 | 3.70 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 97.2% |
| 2010 | PA | 2020 | 3.60 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 96.3% |
| 2010 | VA | 2020 | 3.64 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 96.7% |
| 2010 | TX | 2010 | 3.60 | Top 30% | Caucasian | 96.0% |
| 2010 | FL | 2010 | 3.63 | Top 25% | Caucasian | 96.3% |
| 2010 | FL | 2000 | 3.80 | Top 15% | Caucasian | 99.2% |
| 2010 | TN | 2000 | 3.72 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 97.2% |
| 2010 | NY | 2000 | 3.64 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 96.2% |
| 2010 | PA | 1990 | 3.90 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 99.4% |
| 2010 | FL | 1990 | 3.50 | Top 10% | East Asian | 97.9% |
| 2010 | MA | 1990 | 3.70 | Unknown | Caucasian | 96.5% |
| 2010 | CO | 1980 | 3.50 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 93.2% |
| 2010 | LA | 1970 | 3.85 | Top 10% | South Asian | 99.3% |
| 2010 | VA | 1960 | 3.65 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 94.9% |
| 2010 | GA | 1950 | 3.85 | Top 15% | Caucasian | 97.0% |
| 2010 | NJ | 1950 | 3.50 | Unknown | Caucasian | 91.5% |
| 2010 | (Private) | 1940 | 3.80 | Top 25% | Caucasian | 96.3% |
| 2010 | VA | 1930 | 3.50 | Class Not Ranked | East Asian | 90.1% |
| 2010 | OH | 1930 | 3.80 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 95.9% |
| 2010 | CA | 1930 | 3.89 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 96.9% |
| 2010 | MO | 1910 | 3.90 | Top 4% | Caucasian | 97.4% |
| 2010 | PA | 1900 | 3.67 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 92.4% |
| 2010 | CA | 1890 | 3.98 | Top 5% | South Asian | 96.8% |
| 2010 | OK | 1880 | 3.58 | Top 20% | Hispanic | 97.3% |
| 2010 | CA | 1870 | 3.85 | Top 5% | None Indicated | 94.4% |
| 2010 | CA | 1860 | 3.70 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 90.8% |
| 2010 | GA | 1850 | 4.00 | Top 3% | Caucasian | 95.9% |
| 2010 | MA | 1810 | 3.76 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 88.8% |
| 2010 | SC | 1730 | 3.70 | Top 5% | Hispanic | 77.8% |
| 2010 | FL | 1630 | 4.00 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 99.3% |
| 2010 | MO | 35 | 4.00 | Valedictorian | Caucasian | 99.9% |
| 2010 | GA | 34 | 3.70 | Top 20% | African-American | 99.6% |
| 2010 | MN | 34 | 3.48 | Top 25% | Caucasian | 99.2% |
| 2010 | IL | 34 | 3.42 | Top 25% | Hispanic | 99.1% |
| 2010 | NY | 34 | 4.00 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 99.8% |
| 2010 | IL | 33 | 3.76 | Top 3% | Hispanic | 99.4% |
| 2010 | NY | 33 | 4.00 | Valedictorian | Caucasian | 99.7% |
| 2010 | CA | 33 | 3.80 | Top 15% | Caucasian | 99.5% |
| 2010 | OK | 33 | 3.75 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 99.4% |
| 2010 | IL | 33 | 3.86 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 99.6% |
| 2010 | FL | 33 | 3.60 | Top 10% | Native American | 99.0% |
| 2010 | IL | 33 | 3.30 | Top 30% | Hispanic | 97.5% |
| 2010 | GA | 33 | 3.71 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 99.3% |
| 2010 | NY | 33 | 3.50 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 98.7% |
| 2010 | IL | 33 | 3.40 | Top 40% | Caucasian | 98.2% |
| 2010 | WA | 33 | 3.83 | Top 20% | Hispanic | 99.5% |
| 2010 | FL | 32 | 3.40 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 97.1% |
| 2010 | MA | 32 | 3.70 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 98.8% |
| 2010 | CO | 32 | 3.95 | Top 4% | Caucasian | 99.5% |
| 2010 | NY | 31 | 3.80 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 98.6% |
| 2010 | IL | 31 | 3.33 | Top 15% | Caucasian | 94.3% |
| 2010 | CO | 31 | 3.97 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 99.2% |
| 2010 | KS | 31 | 3.86 | Top 15% | Caucasian | 98.9% |
| 2010 | VA | 30 | 3.62 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 96.2% |
| 2010 | NY | 30 | 3.52 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 94.9% |
| 2010 | LA | 30 | 3.83 | Top 2% | African-American | 98.0% |
| 2010 | WI | 30 | 3.66 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 96.6% |
| 2010 | FL | 30 | 3.87 | Top 3% | East Asian | 98.2% |
| 2010 | CO | 30 | 4.00 | Top 4% | Caucasian | 98.8% |
| 2010 | WA | 30 | 3.86 | Top 15% | Caucasian | 98.2% |
| 2010 | OR | 30 | 3.80 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 97.8% |
| 2010 | FL | 30 | 4.00 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 98.8% |
| 2010 | TN | 29 | 3.10 | Top 30% | Caucasian | 75.5% |
| 2010 | CO | 29 | 3.77 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 96.2% |
| 2010 | NY | 29 | 3.55 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 92.7% |
| 2010 | CA | 29 | 3.50 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 91.5% |
| 2010 | CA | 25 | 3.44 | Top 15% | African-American | 59.6% |
| 2009 | XX | 2400 | 4.00 | Valedictorian | Caucasian | 99.9% |
| 2009 | TX | 2340 | 3.96 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 99.9% |
| 2009 | (Private) | 2310 | 3.99 | Top 5% | Hispanic | 99.9% |
| 2009 | GA | 2300 | 3.84 | Top 5% | East Asian | 99.8% |
| 2009 | KY | 2300 | 3.66 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 99.7% |
| 2009 | NC | 2290 | 3.90 | Top 5% | Other | 99.9% |
| 2009 | SC | 2280 | 4.00 | Top 1% | Caucasian | 99.9% |
| 2009 | MI | 2270 | 4.00 | Valedictorian | Caucasian | 99.9% |
| 2009 | VT | 2270 | 3.82 | Top 5% | Middle-Eastern | 99.7% |
| 2009 | (Private) | 2270 | 4.00 | Valedictorian | Other | 99.9% |
| 2009 | CA | 2270 | 3.40 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 99.0% |
| 2009 | IL | 2250 | 3.60 | Top 20% | Hispanic | 99.5% |
| 2009 | NY | 2250 | 3.95 | Top 5% | African-American | 99.8% |
| 2009 | CA | 2250 | 4.00 | Salutatorian | None Indicated | 99.8% |
| 2009 | CA | 2250 | 4.00 | Salutatorian | Caucasian | 99.8% |
| 2009 | (Private) | 2250 | 3.83 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 99.7% |
| 2009 | CA | 2240 | 3.97 | Top 1% | East Asian | 99.8% |
| 2009 | MD | 2230 | 3.50 | Unknown | Caucasian | 99.0% |
| 2009 | CA | 2220 | 3.76 | Unknown | Caucasian | 99.5% |
| 2009 | RI | 2220 | 3.80 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 99.6% |
| 2009 | CT | 2220 | 3.73 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 99.5% |
| 2009 | TX | 2220 | 3.77 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 99.5% |
| 2009 | MA | 2220 | 3.55 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 99.1% |
| 2009 | MD | 2210 | 3.57 | Unknown | None Indicated | 99.1% |
| 2009 | IL | 2200 | 3.97 | Top 1% | Caucasian | 99.9% |
| 2009 | AL | 2190 | 3.98 | Top 1% | Caucasian | 99.7% |
| 2009 | CA | 2190 | 3.60 | Top 10% | East Asian | 99.0% |
| 2009 | TX | 2180 | 3.62 | Unknown | South Asian | 99.0% |
| 2009 | CA | 2180 | 3.80 | Top 10% | Hispanic | 99.4% |
| 2009 | CT | 2180 | 3.97 | Top 1% | Caucasian | 99.7% |
| 2009 | (Private) | 2170 | 3.80 | Top 10% | East Asian | 99.4% |
| 2009 | CA | 2170 | 3.30 | Top 20% | Middle-Eastern | 97.1% |
| 2009 | OH | 2160 | 3.99 | Top 1% | None Indicated | 99.7% |
| 2009 | TX | 2160 | 3.92 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 99.5% |
| 2009 | CA | 2150 | 3.40 | Class Not Ranked | African-American | 97.5% |
| 2009 | NY | 2140 | 3.82 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 99.3% |
| 2009 | FL | 2140 | 3.60 | Top 30% | Caucasian | 98.5% |
| 2009 | OH | 2140 | 4.00 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 99.6% |
| 2009 | NJ | 2130 | 3.70 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 98.8% |
| 2009 | FL | 2130 | 3.73 | Unknown | Caucasian | 98.9% |
| 2009 | WI | 2130 | 3.80 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 99.2% |
| 2009 | NJ | 2130 | 3.80 | Top 5% | None Indicated | 99.2% |
| 2009 | PA | 2130 | 3.89 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 99.4% |
| 2009 | FL | 2120 | 3.65 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 98.5% |
| 2009 | CA | 2120 | 3.77 | Class Not Ranked | Other | 99.0% |
| 2009 | MD | 2120 | 3.90 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 99.3% |
| 2009 | FL | 2110 | 3.60 | Top 10% | East Asian | 98.1% |
| 2009 | NC | 2110 | 3.90 | Top 5% | None Indicated | 99.3% |
| 2009 | WI | 2100 | 3.98 | Top 1% | Caucasian | 99.8% |
| 2009 | FL | 2100 | 3.65 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 98.3% |
| 2009 | CA | 2100 | 3.80 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 98.9% |
| 2009 | UT | 2100 | 3.94 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 99.3% |
| 2009 | NJ | 2090 | 3.50 | Top 30% | Caucasian | 98.7% |
| 2009 | (Private) | 2090 | 3.30 | Class Not Ranked | East Asian | 94.7% |
| 2009 | PA | 2090 | 3.70 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 98.4% |
| 2009 | MA | 2080 | 3.70 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 99.3% |
| 2009 | NJ | 2080 | 3.17 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 91.5% |
| 2009 | NJ | 2080 | 3.20 | Top 30% | Caucasian | 92.2% |
| 2009 | (Private) | 2080 | 3.40 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 95.7% |
| 2009 | RI | 2080 | 2.76 | Unknown | Middle-Eastern | 74.8% |
| 2009 | FL | 2070 | 4.00 | Salutatorian | Caucasian | 99.7% |
| 2009 | CA | 2070 | 3.83 | Top 20% | African-American | 98.8% |
| 2009 | CT | 2070 | 3.80 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 98.6% |
| 2009 | FL | 2060 | 3.60 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 97.3% |
| 2009 | MA | 2050 | 3.20 | Class Not Ranked | East Asian | 91.7% |
| 2009 | NY | 2050 | 3.84 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 98.8% |
| 2009 | TX | 2050 | 3.39 | Top 40% | Caucasian | 94.4% |
| 2009 | KS | 2050 | 4.00 | Valedictorian | Caucasian | 99.1% |
| 2009 | PA | 2040 | 4.00 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 99.1% |
| 2009 | VA | 2040 | 3.80 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 98.3% |
| 2009 | TX | 2030 | 3.70 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 97.5% |
| 2009 | NY | 2030 | 3.70 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 97.5% |
| 2009 | FL | 2020 | 3.75 | Top 5% | Hispanic | 97.6% |
| 2009 | NY | 2010 | 3.80 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 97.8% |
| 2009 | TX | 2010 | 3.75 | Top 10% | East Asian | 97.5% |
| 2009 | MD | 2010 | 3.80 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 97.8% |
| 2009 | OH | 2010 | 3.60 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 96.0% |
| 2009 | FL | 2000 | 3.69 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 96.7% |
| 2009 | PA | 1980 | 3.65 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 95.6% |
| 2009 | MA | 1970 | 3.40 | Top 30% | Caucasian | 90.3% |
| 2009 | FL | 1960 | 4.00 | Valedictorian | East Asian | 98.2% |
| 2009 | MA | 1950 | 3.13 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 77.2% |
| 2009 | MO | 1940 | 3.75 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 95.7% |
| 2009 | FL | 1940 | 3.70 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 95.0% |
| 2009 | OH | 1940 | 3.80 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 96.3% |
| 2009 | CA | 1940 | 3.63 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 93.8% |
| 2009 | CA | 1930 | 3.53 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 98.8% |
| 2009 | NY | 1930 | 3.90 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 97.0% |
| 2009 | PA | 1930 | 3.90 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 97.0% |
| 2009 | FL | 1920 | 3.10 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 70.7% |
| 2009 | CA | 1920 | 4.00 | Valedictorian | Caucasian | 97.6% |
| 2009 | (Private) | 1920 | 3.70 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 94.1% |
| 2009 | VA | 1910 | 3.93 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 96.8% |
| 2009 | NE | 1900 | 3.30 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 93.8% |
| 2009 | CA | 1890 | 3.68 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 92.2% |
| 2009 | NY | 1880 | 3.57 | Top 30% | Hispanic | 89.3% |
| 2009 | TX | 1870 | 3.51 | Top 20% | African-American | 91.8% |
| 2009 | NY | 1870 | 3.80 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 96.5% |
| 2009 | MD | 1870 | 3.60 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 90.1% |
| 2009 | MD | 1760 | 3.50 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 80.5% |
| 2009 | FL | 1760 | 3.85 | Top 10% | Hispanic | 87.7% |
| 2009 | MS | 1580 | 3.89 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 98.3% |
| 2009 | MA | 1580 | 3.75 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 99.9% |
| 2009 | LA | 1410 | 3.85 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 99.2% |
| 2009 | FL | 35 | 3.98 | Salutatorian | Caucasian | 99.9% |
| 2009 | CO | 34 | 3.87 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 99.8% |
| 2009 | FL | 34 | 3.75 | Top 10% | None Indicated | 99.7% |
| 2009 | WI | 34 | 3.70 | Class Not Ranked | Hispanic | 99.6% |
| 2009 | NC | 34 | 4.00 | Class Not Ranked | Middle-Eastern | 99.8% |
| 2009 | PA | 34 | 3.90 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 99.8% |
| 2009 | IA | 34 | 3.95 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 99.8% |
| 2009 | LA | 34 | 4.00 | Top 1% | Caucasian | 99.8% |
| 2009 | IL | 33 | 3.95 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 99.7% |
| 2009 | IL | 32 | 3.75 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 99.0% |
| 2009 | MT | 32 | 3.98 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 99.5% |
| 2009 | NY | 32 | 4.00 | Top 1% | Caucasian | 99.5% |
| 2009 | NJ | 32 | 3.70 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 98.8% |
| 2009 | CA | 32 | 3.93 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 99.4% |
| 2009 | CA | 32 | 3.40 | Class Not Ranked | Hispanic | 97.1% |
| 2009 | NY | 32 | 3.82 | Top 20% | African-American | 99.2% |
| 2009 | IL | 32 | 3.70 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 98.8% |
| 2009 | LA | 32 | 3.50 | Top 40% | Caucasian | 97.9% |
| 2009 | OH | 31 | 3.85 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 98.8% |
| 2009 | OH | 31 | 3.85 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 98.8% |
| 2009 | IL | 31 | 3.64 | Class Not Ranked | East Asian | 97.8% |
| 2009 | MO | 31 | 4.00 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 99.3% |
| 2009 | NY | 31 | 3.80 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 98.6% |
| 2009 | IL | 31 | 3.32 | Top 40% | Caucasian | 94.1% |
| 2009 | IL | 30 | 4.00 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 98.8% |
| 2009 | TX | 30 | 3.20 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 87.2% |
| 2009 | TN | 29 | 3.80 | Unknown | African-American | 96.5% |
| 2009 | NY | 29 | 3.70 | Unknown | Caucasian | 95.3% |
| 2009 | AZ | 28 | 3.83 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 95.0% |
| 2009 | IL | 28 | 3.60 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 90.1% |
| 2009 | OH | 28 | 4.00 | Top 1% | Caucasian | 97.0% |
| 2009 | TX | 28 | 3.60 | Top 10% | South Asian | 90.1% |
| 2009 | FL | 27 | 3.35 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 72.1% |
| 2009 | FL | 24 | 3.40 | Top 30% | Caucasian | 44.6% |
| 2008 | MA | 2350 | 4.00 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 99.9% |
| 2008 | PA | 2340 | 3.70 | Top 10% | East Asian | 99.8% |
| 2008 | NY | 2340 | 4.00 | Salutatorian | Caucasian | 99.9% |
| 2008 | (Private) | 2320 | 4.00 | Top 1% | South Asian | 99.9% |
| 2008 | IL | 2270 | 3.98 | Unknown | Caucasian | 99.8% |
| 2008 | LA | 2270 | 3.90 | Salutatorian | East Asian | 99.8% |
| 2008 | NJ | 2270 | 3.50 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 99.3% |
| 2008 | LA | 2250 | 3.95 | Valedictorian | Caucasian | 99.8% |
| 2008 | TX | 2250 | 3.55 | Unknown | East Asian | 99.3% |
| 2008 | NJ | 2240 | 3.43 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 98.9% |
| 2008 | LA | 2230 | 4.00 | Valedictorian | Caucasian | 99.9% |
| 2008 | TX | 2230 | 3.70 | Unknown | East Asian | 99.5% |
| 2008 | PA | 2220 | 3.90 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 99.8% |
| 2008 | MA | 2210 | 3.56 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 99.1% |
| 2008 | NY | 2200 | 4.00 | Top 5% | South Asian | 99.7% |
| 2008 | (Private) | 2180 | 4.00 | Valedictorian | East Asian | 99.8% |
| 2008 | MO | 2180 | 3.80 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 99.5% |
| 2008 | PA | 2180 | 3.90 | Top 5% | None Indicated | 99.6% |
| 2008 | NY | 2180 | 3.72 | Top 10% | None Indicated | 99.3% |
| 2008 | CA | 2170 | 3.69 | Top 20% | East Asian | 99.1% |
| 2008 | OH | 2160 | 3.42 | Top 20% | South Asian | 97.8% |
| 2008 | NY | 2120 | 3.85 | Unknown | Caucasian | 99.3% |
| 2008 | (Private) | 2120 | 3.94 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 99.5% |
| 2008 | MD | 2110 | 3.43 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 96.9% |
| 2008 | NJ | 2090 | 3.80 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 98.8% |
| 2008 | NY | 2090 | 3.80 | Valedictorian | Caucasian | 98.8% |
| 2008 | NH | 2070 | 3.80 | Unknown | None Indicated | 98.6% |
| 2008 | NJ | 2070 | 3.70 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 98.1% |
| 2008 | FL | 2050 | 3.50 | Unknown | Caucasian | 96.0% |
| 2008 | FL | 2040 | 3.30 | Bottom 50% | Hispanic | 92.2% |
| 2008 | MD | 2040 | 3.76 | Top 10% | South Asian | 98.0% |
| 2008 | NC | 2040 | 3.50 | Unknown | Caucasian | 95.7% |
| 2008 | NJ | 2030 | 3.70 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 97.5% |
| 2008 | PA | 2020 | 3.70 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 99.3% |
| 2008 | CA | 2020 | 3.50 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 96.6% |
| 2008 | NY | 2020 | 3.70 | Top 10% | Hispanic | 97.2% |
| 2008 | OK | 2000 | 3.88 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 98.2% |
| 2008 | PA | 1980 | 3.39 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 95.2% |
| 2008 | CA | 1980 | 3.67 | Valedictorian | Caucasian | 95.9% |
| 2008 | NY | 1950 | 3.90 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 98.4% |
| 2008 | CA | 1950 | 3.25 | Top 30% | None Indicated | 83.1% |
| 2008 | VA | 1950 | 3.63 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 94.2% |
| 2008 | PA | 1950 | 3.30 | Top 30% | African-American | 85.2% |
| 2008 | NY | 1940 | 3.70 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 95.0% |
| 2008 | VA | 1930 | 3.50 | Unknown | Caucasian | 94.6% |
| 2008 | PA | 1930 | 3.80 | Unknown | Caucasian | 95.9% |
| 2008 | TX | 1920 | 4.00 | Salutatorian | Caucasian | 99.3% |
| 2008 | NM | 1920 | 3.96 | Top 10% | Hispanic | 97.3% |
| 2008 | CO | 1890 | 3.88 | Unknown | Caucasian | 97.3% |
| 2008 | IL | 1890 | 3.31 | Unknown | Hispanic | 78.6% |
| 2008 | WA | 1890 | 3.55 | Unknown | Caucasian | 88.7% |
| 2008 | CA | 1870 | 3.06 | Unknown | None Indicated | 58.6% |
| 2008 | CA | 1850 | 3.89 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 94.3% |
| 2008 | NY | 1830 | 3.70 | Unknown | Caucasian | 88.6% |
| 2008 | NY | 1830 | 3.20 | Top 20% | South Asian | 61.7% |
| 2008 | NC | 1760 | 3.49 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 69.7% |
| 2008 | MD | 1460 | 4.00 | Unknown | Caucasian | 99.7% |
| 2008 | FL | 1320 | 3.50 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 93.2% |
| 2008 | CA | 33 | 3.51 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 98.7% |
| 2008 | NY | 33 | 3.63 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 99.1% |
| 2008 | AL | 33 | 3.80 | Top 10% | Other | 99.5% |
| 2008 | LA | 32 | 3.87 | Top 5% | None Indicated | 99.3% |
| 2008 | SD | 32 | 4.00 | Valedictorian | Middle-Eastern | 99.5% |
| 2008 | GA | 32 | 3.80 | Unknown | East Asian | 99.2% |
| 2008 | MO | 31 | 3.60 | Unknown | Caucasian | 97.5% |
| 2008 | OK | 31 | 3.85 | Valedictorian | Caucasian | 98.8% |
| 2008 | OH | 30 | 4.00 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 98.8% |
| 2008 | NY | 29 | 3.70 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 95.3% |
| 2008 | XX | 29 | 3.45 | Unknown | South Asian | 90.2% |
| 2008 | OK | 28 | 3.97 | Top 1% | Caucasian | 96.7% |
| 2007 | MD | 2270 | 3.30 | Top 40% | Caucasian | 98.7% |
| 2007 | MD | 2250 | 4.00 | Unknown | Caucasian | 99.8% |
| 2007 | CA | 2160 | 3.80 | Unknown | East Asian | 99.3% |
| 2007 | IN | 1900 | 4.00 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 97.2% |
| 2007 | TX | 1870 | 3.65 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 98.6% |
| 2007 | MD | 1700 | 3.37 | Unknown | Caucasian | 49.5% |
| 2007 | TN | 34 | 4.00 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 99.8% |
| 2007 | FL | 31 | 3.75 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 98.4% |
| 2006 | MD | 2370 | 3.87 | Unknown | None Indicated | 99.9% |
| 2006 | TX | 2250 | 3.90 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 99.8% |
| 2006 | TX | 2130 | 4.00 | Class Not Ranked | Hispanic | 99.5% |
| 2006 | FL | 2040 | 3.75 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 98.0% |
| 2006 | NC | 31 | 3.71 | Unknown | Caucasian | 98.2% |
| 2005 | NY | 2250 | 3.90 | Top 5% | None Indicated | 99.8% |
| 2003 | GA | 1390 | 3.80 | Top 20% | Hispanic | 98.8% |
| 2002 | TX | 1530 | 4.00 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 99.9% |
|
| 2010 | FL | 23 | 3.18 | Top 20% | Hispanic | 20.0% |
| 2009 | NY | 2250 | 3.50 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 99.2% |
| 2009 | FL | 2210 | 4.00 | Valedictorian | Caucasian | 99.8% |
| 2009 | WA | 2180 | 3.50 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 98.6% |
| 2009 | CA | 2020 | 3.40 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 93.2% |
| 2009 | LA | 2000 | 3.10 | Bottom 50% | Caucasian | 83.3% |
| 2009 | TX | 2000 | 3.83 | Top 10% | East Asian | 97.9% |
| 2009 | OH | 1990 | 2.50 | Top 35% | Caucasian | 39.0% |
| 2009 | CA | 1970 | 3.27 | Class Not Ranked | East Asian | 86.1% |
| 2009 | PA | 1960 | 3.50 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 92.1% |
| 2009 | MA | 1910 | 3.62 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 92.0% |
| 2009 | CT | 1890 | 3.00 | Top 30% | None Indicated | 58.2% |
| 2009 | FL | 1830 | 3.38 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 73.9% |
| 2009 | NY | 1830 | 3.30 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 68.8% |
| 2009 | TN | 1810 | 3.50 | Top 10% | Hispanic | 77.7% |
| 2009 | (Private) | 1790 | 3.45 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 72.1% |
| 2009 | NY | 1770 | 3.20 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 49.9% |
| 2009 | NC | 1760 | 3.84 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 87.4% |
| 2009 | IL | 27 | 2.90 | Unknown | Caucasian | 38.6% |
| 2008 | CA | 2080 | 3.29 | Unknown | Other | 94.0% |
| 2008 | NJ | 1990 | 3.79 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 97.3% |
| 2008 | NY | 1550 | 3.50 | Top 30% | Caucasian | 74.2% |
| 2008 | VA | 32 | 3.40 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 97.1% |
| 2005 | NY | 1290 | 3.90 | Top 10% | None Indicated | 97.1% |
|
|
| 2010 | NJ | 1960 | 3.48 | Top 25% | Caucasian | 91.6% |
| 2010 | TX | 1810 | 3.00 | Top 40% | Caucasian | 46.2% |
| 2010 | NY | 1770 | 3.40 | Class Not Ranked | Hispanic | 67.8% |
| 2010 | (Private) | 32 | 2.90 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 87.4% |
| 2009 | MD | 2210 | 2.98 | Class Not Ranked | East Asian | 94.5% |
| 2009 | XX | 1970 | 4.00 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 98.4% |
| 2009 | CT | 1920 | 3.60 | Top 30% | Caucasian | 92.1% |
| 2009 | NH | 1870 | 3.28 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 73.9% |
| 2009 | NC | 1860 | 2.76 | Unknown | Caucasian | 34.0% |
| 2009 | NY | 1840 | 3.50 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 81.6% |
| 2009 | NY | 1810 | 3.00 | Unknown | Hispanic | 46.2% |
| 2009 | NY | 1770 | 2.90 | Unknown | Caucasian | 28.0% |
| 2009 | CT | 1710 | 3.25 | Top 40% | Caucasian | 41.9% |
| 2009 | CA | 1680 | 2.82 | Unknown | African-American | 12.8% |
| 2009 | GA | 28 | 3.10 | Unknown | Caucasian | 65.5% |
| 2008 | FL | 2100 | 4.00 | Top 1% | None Indicated | 99.4% |
| 2008 | CA | 1680 | 3.30 | Top 10% | Middle-Eastern | 39.9% |
| 2008 | TN | 27 | 3.30 | Top 20% | African-American | 68.8% |
| 2008 | CA | 25 | 3.70 | Top 10% | South Asian | 77.0% |
|
| 2011 | IL | 2230 | 3.50 | Top 25% | Caucasian | 99.0% |
| 2010 | NY | 2320 | 3.94 | Top 15% | Caucasian | 99.9% |
| 2010 | GA | 2290 | 3.92 | Top 2% | Caucasian | 99.9% |
| 2010 | CA | 2290 | 4.00 | Top 1% | Hispanic | 99.9% |
| 2010 | FL | 2260 | 3.90 | Top 1% | Caucasian | 99.8% |
| 2010 | VA | 2230 | 3.95 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 99.8% |
| 2010 | FL | 2190 | 4.00 | Salutatorian | Caucasian | 99.7% |
| 2010 | CA | 2180 | 4.00 | Top 2% | Caucasian | 99.7% |
| 2010 | NV | 2170 | 3.52 | Top 20% | Other | 98.5% |
| 2010 | AK | 2170 | 3.80 | Top 10% | East Asian | 99.4% |
| 2010 | NY | 2160 | 3.90 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 99.5% |
| 2010 | LA | 2150 | 3.20 | Top 25% | South Asian | 98.1% |
| 2010 | OR | 2140 | 3.70 | Top 15% | Hispanic | 98.9% |
| 2010 | MD | 2130 | 3.88 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 99.6% |
| 2010 | CA | 2130 | 3.78 | Top 15% | None Indicated | 99.4% |
| 2010 | CA | 2130 | 3.12 | Class Not Ranked | South Asian | 93.3% |
| 2010 | (Private) | 2130 | 3.60 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 98.4% |
| 2010 | NY | 2120 | 3.50 | Top 30% | Caucasian | 97.7% |
| 2010 | CT | 2120 | 3.10 | Top 30% | Caucasian | 92.4% |
| 2010 | VA | 2110 | 3.60 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 98.1% |
| 2010 | NY | 2110 | 4.00 | Top 1% | Caucasian | 99.5% |
| 2010 | NJ | 2100 | 3.22 | Unknown | East Asian | 93.7% |
| 2010 | NJ | 2090 | 3.40 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 97.1% |
| 2010 | CA | 2090 | 3.00 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 87.4% |
| 2010 | CA | 2090 | 3.53 | Unknown | Caucasian | 97.3% |
| 2010 | FL | 2070 | 3.70 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 98.8% |
| 2010 | PA | 2070 | 3.60 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 97.5% |
| 2010 | NY | 2060 | 3.79 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 98.5% |
| 2010 | VA | 2060 | 3.40 | Top 30% | Caucasian | 95.0% |
| 2010 | GA | 2040 | 3.38 | Top 40% | Caucasian | 95.1% |
| 2010 | IL | 2040 | 4.00 | Top 2% | Caucasian | 99.3% |
| 2010 | PA | 2040 | 4.00 | Top 1% | Caucasian | 99.1% |
| 2010 | GA | 2020 | 3.77 | Top 10% | East Asian | 97.8% |
| 2010 | NJ | 2020 | 3.98 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 98.8% |
| 2010 | NY | 2010 | 3.40 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 95.4% |
| 2010 | TX | 2010 | 3.87 | Top 30% | Hispanic | 98.2% |
| 2010 | NY | 2010 | 3.20 | Top 30% | South Asian | 87.2% |
| 2010 | MD | 2000 | 3.30 | Top 25% | East Asian | 93.8% |
| 2010 | (Private) | 2000 | 3.80 | Top 5% | East Asian | 97.7% |
| 2010 | NC | 2000 | 3.75 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 97.3% |
| 2010 | NC | 2000 | 3.75 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 97.3% |
| 2010 | OR | 1970 | 3.84 | Top 15% | East Asian | 98.1% |
| 2010 | NY | 1970 | 3.50 | Top 40% | Caucasian | 92.7% |
| 2010 | XX | 1970 | 3.72 | Top 4% | East Asian | 96.2% |
| 2010 | NY | 1970 | 3.17 | Bottom 50% | Caucasian | 81.9% |
| 2010 | MN | 1960 | 3.65 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 96.5% |
| 2010 | (Private) | 1960 | 3.60 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 94.1% |
| 2010 | CA | 1960 | 3.73 | Class Not Ranked | South Asian | 96.0% |
| 2010 | NH | 1960 | 3.70 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 95.6% |
| 2010 | NJ | 1950 | 3.80 | Top 3% | East Asian | 96.5% |
| 2010 | CA | 1940 | 3.75 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 95.9% |
| 2010 | NJ | 1930 | 3.60 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 92.6% |
| 2010 | CA | 1930 | 3.41 | Top 10% | Hispanic | 87.3% |
| 2010 | CA | 1920 | 3.95 | Top 2% | Caucasian | 98.6% |
| 2010 | FL | 1920 | 3.92 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 96.9% |
| 2010 | NY | 1920 | 3.60 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 92.1% |
| 2010 | NY | 1920 | 3.60 | Top 20% | Other | 92.1% |
| 2010 | FL | 1910 | 3.48 | Top 10% | Native American | 88.1% |
| 2010 | CT | 1910 | 2.80 | Unknown | Caucasian | 46.7% |
| 2010 | WA | 1910 | 3.78 | Top 15% | Caucasian | 95.0% |
| 2010 | GA | 1890 | 3.60 | Top 40% | Caucasian | 93.7% |
| 2010 | MA | 1870 | 3.00 | Top 15% | Caucasian | 54.0% |
| 2010 | MA | 1870 | 3.50 | Top 15% | Caucasian | 85.0% |
| 2010 | FL | 1860 | 3.69 | Unknown | Caucasian | 96.9% |
| 2010 | VA | 1820 | 3.56 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 82.3% |
| 2010 | LA | 1810 | 3.40 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 92.7% |
| 2010 | NJ | 1790 | 3.50 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 75.1% |
| 2010 | (Private) | 1760 | 3.62 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 77.6% |
| 2010 | NJ | 1750 | 3.50 | Top 25% | Caucasian | 74.2% |
| 2010 | GA | 1740 | 3.21 | Unknown | African-American | 87.5% |
| 2010 | OH | 1740 | 3.50 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 66.8% |
| 2010 | FL | 1710 | 3.60 | Top 10% | African-American | 68.4% |
| 2010 | LA | 1700 | 2.50 | Unknown | Caucasian | 7.2% |
| 2010 | CA | 1700 | 3.08 | Top 35% | Hispanic | 28.2% |
| 2010 | NY | 1620 | 3.50 | Top 25% | African-American | 74.2% |
| 2010 | FL | 1390 | 3.20 | Unknown | Caucasian | 9.2% |
| 2010 | PA | 33 | 3.50 | Class Not Ranked | South Asian | 98.7% |
| 2010 | CA | 33 | 3.60 | Top 15% | Caucasian | 99.0% |
| 2010 | OH | 33 | 4.00 | Top 1% | Caucasian | 99.7% |
| 2010 | IL | 32 | 4.00 | Valedictorian | Caucasian | 99.5% |
| 2010 | FL | 32 | 3.50 | Top 3% | Caucasian | 97.9% |
| 2010 | SC | 31 | 3.84 | Top 4% | Caucasian | 98.8% |
| 2010 | MO | 31 | 3.86 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 98.9% |
| 2010 | IL | 31 | 3.50 | Class Not Ranked | East Asian | 96.6% |
| 2010 | WI | 30 | 3.35 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 91.6% |
| 2010 | NM | 30 | 3.48 | Top 15% | None Indicated | 94.2% |
| 2010 | WV | 30 | 3.75 | Class Not Ranked | None Indicated | 97.5% |
| 2010 | NY | 30 | 3.88 | Bottom 50% | Caucasian | 98.3% |
| 2010 | FL | 30 | 3.71 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 97.1% |
| 2010 | NY | 30 | 3.68 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 96.8% |
| 2010 | IL | 30 | 3.70 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 97.0% |
| 2010 | MO | 30 | 4.00 | Top 1% | East Asian | 98.8% |
| 2010 | IA | 30 | 3.82 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 97.9% |
| 2010 | CA | 29 | 3.11 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 76.0% |
| 2010 | FL | 29 | 3.96 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 97.9% |
| 2010 | TN | 29 | 4.00 | Top 2% | Caucasian | 98.1% |
| 2010 | TX | 27 | 3.70 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 88.6% |
| 2010 | MS | 26 | 3.90 | Top 10% | South Asian | 91.0% |
| 2010 | OH | 26 | 3.30 | Bottom 50% | Caucasian | 60.6% |
| 2010 | MN | 26 | 3.10 | Top 25% | Caucasian | 45.1% |
| 2009 | CA | 2210 | 3.90 | Top 20% | East Asian | 99.7% |
| 2009 | CO | 2180 | 3.84 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 99.5% |
| 2009 | NV | 2130 | 3.70 | Top 1% | Caucasian | 98.8% |
| 2009 | CA | 2120 | 3.55 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 98.9% |
| 2009 | CA | 2100 | 3.20 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 93.3% |
| 2009 | TX | 2080 | 3.70 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 98.3% |
| 2009 | PA | 2060 | 3.90 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 98.9% |
| 2009 | FL | 2050 | 2.88 | Top 30% | None Indicated | 77.3% |
| 2009 | NY | 2040 | 3.50 | Unknown | Caucasian | 95.7% |
| 2009 | NJ | 2040 | 3.65 | Top 40% | Caucasian | 97.3% |
| 2009 | MD | 2020 | 3.72 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 97.4% |
| 2009 | (Private) | 2020 | 3.50 | Class Not Ranked | None Indicated | 94.9% |
| 2009 | XX | 2010 | 3.62 | Unknown | East Asian | 96.2% |
| 2009 | CT | 2010 | 3.06 | Unknown | Caucasian | 81.4% |
| 2009 | GA | 1990 | 3.40 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 91.5% |
| 2009 | NY | 1980 | 3.70 | Unknown | Hispanic | 96.3% |
| 2009 | XX | 1960 | 4.00 | Valedictorian | East Asian | 98.2% |
| 2009 | PA | 1940 | 3.44 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 89.3% |
| 2009 | NY | 1910 | 3.60 | Unknown | None Indicated | 91.5% |
| 2009 | FL | 1890 | 3.40 | Bottom 50% | Caucasian | 83.0% |
| 2009 | NY | 1850 | 3.60 | Unknown | Caucasian | 87.0% |
| 2009 | FL | 1840 | 3.13 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 89.8% |
| 2009 | NY | 1840 | 3.66 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 88.0% |
| 2009 | CT | 1830 | 3.68 | Top 5% | South Asian | 87.9% |
| 2009 | NJ | 1800 | 3.40 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 70.4% |
| 2009 | XX | 1790 | 2.80 | Top 10% | African-American | 25.1% |
| 2009 | (Private) | 1780 | 3.30 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 59.4% |
| 2009 | FL | 1760 | 2.90 | Top 30% | Caucasian | 30.5% |
| 2009 | XX | 1750 | 3.81 | Class Not Ranked | East Asian | 85.1% |
| 2009 | NC | 1720 | 3.54 | Top 20% | African-American | 65.8% |
| 2009 | TX | 1620 | 3.55 | Top 20% | Hispanic | 47.4% |
| 2009 | XX | 1610 | 3.22 | Bottom 40% | East Asian | 22.9% |
| 2009 | NY | 35 | 3.96 | Top 5% | None Indicated | 99.9% |
| 2009 | MD | 30 | 3.00 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 78.4% |
| 2009 | IL | 27 | 3.60 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 85.0% |
| 2009 | TX | 27 | 3.55 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 82.9% |
| 2009 | LA | 26 | 3.60 | Top 5% | African-American | 79.8% |
| 2009 | GA | 26 | 2.80 | Class Not Ranked | Hispanic | 24.2% |
| 2009 | MI | 26 | 3.50 | Top 40% | Caucasian | 74.2% |
| 2009 | MO | 25 | 3.50 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 64.1% |
| 2008 | AZ | 2290 | 3.97 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 99.9% |
| 2008 | DE | 2270 | 3.80 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 99.8% |
| 2008 | FL | 2250 | 3.77 | Unknown | African-American | 99.6% |
| 2008 | CT | 2230 | 3.40 | Unknown | Caucasian | 98.7% |
| 2008 | FL | 2170 | 3.80 | Unknown | African-American | 99.4% |
| 2008 | PA | 2150 | 3.78 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 99.2% |
| 2008 | MA | 2090 | 3.25 | Unknown | Caucasian | 93.8% |
| 2008 | NY | 2080 | 3.50 | Unknown | Caucasian | 96.8% |
| 2008 | NJ | 2070 | 3.50 | Unknown | None Indicated | 96.6% |
| 2008 | OH | 2060 | 3.66 | Unknown | Middle-Eastern | 97.7% |
| 2008 | PA | 2040 | 3.85 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 98.5% |
| 2008 | MA | 2040 | 3.70 | Top 20% | East Asian | 97.7% |
| 2008 | XX | 2040 | 4.00 | Top 10% | East Asian | 99.1% |
| 2008 | PA | 2040 | 3.60 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 96.8% |
| 2008 | MA | 2010 | 3.35 | Unknown | None Indicated | 91.6% |
| 2008 | TX | 1970 | 3.50 | Top 30% | Caucasian | 92.7% |
| 2008 | FL | 1950 | 3.30 | Top 10% | Hispanic | 85.2% |
| 2008 | NC | 1950 | 3.80 | Class Not Ranked | Hispanic | 96.5% |
| 2008 | XX | 1940 | 3.80 | Top 5% | Hispanic | 96.3% |
| 2008 | CA | 1930 | 3.60 | Unknown | Hispanic | 92.6% |
| 2008 | NY | 1920 | 3.60 | Unknown | Caucasian | 92.1% |
| 2008 | XX | 1880 | 3.30 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 76.8% |
| 2008 | (Private) | 1850 | 3.65 | Top 30% | Caucasian | 88.7% |
| 2008 | TN | 1820 | 3.60 | Unknown | Caucasian | 85.0% |
| 2008 | CA | 1800 | 3.70 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 85.9% |
| 2008 | NJ | 1780 | 3.00 | Unknown | Caucasian | 36.4% |
| 2008 | VA | 1770 | 3.70 | Top 10% | Hispanic | 82.7% |
| 2008 | CO | 1730 | 3.61 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 72.5% |
| 2008 | FL | 1630 | 3.45 | Top 5% | Middle-Eastern | 41.4% |
| 2008 | PA | 1500 | 2.80 | Unknown | African-American | 3.2% |
| 2008 | NJ | 1110 | 3.61 | Unknown | Caucasian | 1.8% |
| 2008 | AL | 32 | 3.73 | Top 10% | East Asian | 98.9% |
| 2008 | NY | 28 | 3.70 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 92.6% |
| 2008 | IL | 28 | 3.18 | Unknown | Caucasian | 71.0% |
| 2008 | (Private) | 27 | 2.90 | Bottom 40% | East Asian | 38.6% |
| 2008 | MN | 26 | 3.39 | Top 30% | Caucasian | 67.1% |
| 2007 | CA | 2210 | 3.85 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 99.6% |
| 2007 | MA | 2000 | 3.20 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 86.4% |
| 2007 | IA | 32 | 3.65 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 98.6% |
|
| 2012 | IL | 2300 | 3.45 | Top 40% | East Asian | 99.4% |
| 2012 | MD | 2290 | 3.66 | Valedictorian | Caucasian | 99.6% |
| 2012 | AZ | 2290 | 3.72 | Class Not Ranked | East Asian | 99.7% |
| 2012 | LA | 2260 | 4.00 | Valedictorian | Caucasian | 99.8% |
| 2012 | NY | 2200 | 3.25 | Unknown | Other | 97.3% |
| 2012 | HI | 1970 | 3.88 | Top 5% | East Asian | 97.7% |
| 2012 | PA | 1630 | 3.40 | Top 40% | Caucasian | 37.7% |
| 2012 | FL | 1350 | 3.45 | Bottom 50% | Caucasian | 7.0% |
| 2012 | MI | 33 | 3.40 | Unknown | Caucasian | 98.2% |
| 2012 | IN | 32 | 3.86 | Top 4% | Other | 99.3% |
| 2012 | TN | 30 | 4.00 | Top 15% | Caucasian | 98.8% |
| 2012 | LA | 28 | 3.70 | Top 10% | African-American | 92.6% |
| 2011 | NY | 2360 | 3.80 | Bottom 40% | East Asian | 99.9% |
| 2011 | CA | 2330 | 3.50 | Class Not Ranked | Middle-Eastern | 99.6% |
| 2011 | CA | 2300 | 3.75 | Top 5% | East Asian | 99.7% |
| 2011 | TX | 2280 | 3.70 | Top 25% | Caucasian | 99.6% |
| 2011 | NE | 2250 | 3.93 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 99.8% |
| 2011 | FL | 2240 | 4.00 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 99.8% |
| 2011 | MD | 2230 | 3.60 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 99.3% |
| 2011 | FL | 2230 | 3.60 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 99.3% |
| 2011 | PA | 2210 | 3.50 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 98.9% |
| 2011 | (Private) | 2190 | 3.80 | Top 35% | Caucasian | 99.5% |
| 2011 | WA | 2180 | 3.98 | Top 5% | Other | 99.7% |
| 2011 | TX | 2160 | 3.92 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 99.5% |
| 2011 | NY | 2160 | 3.65 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 98.9% |
| 2011 | NJ | 2120 | 3.69 | Top 15% | Caucasian | 98.7% |
| 2011 | NJ | 2100 | 3.00 | Bottom 50% | Caucasian | 88.2% |
| 2011 | NM | 2100 | 3.28 | Top 15% | African-American | 94.7% |
| 2011 | KY | 2090 | 3.80 | Top 5% | Other | 99.5% |
| 2011 | NY | 2090 | 3.60 | Top 25% | Caucasian | 97.9% |
| 2011 | XX | 2080 | 3.26 | Class Not Ranked | South Asian | 93.5% |
| 2011 | MA | 2060 | 3.04 | Unknown | Caucasian | 86.1% |
| 2011 | NC | 2050 | 3.50 | Unknown | Caucasian | 96.0% |
| 2011 | MA | 2040 | 3.40 | Unknown | Caucasian | 94.2% |
| 2011 | MO | 1990 | 2.80 | Bottom 40% | Caucasian | 62.1% |
| 2011 | NY | 1990 | 3.05 | Class Not Ranked | Hispanic | 78.2% |
| 2011 | CT | 1990 | 3.70 | Bottom 50% | Caucasian | 96.5% |
| 2011 | NJ | 1980 | 4.00 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 98.8% |
| 2011 | SC | 1970 | 3.65 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 99.2% |
| 2011 | AL | 1960 | 3.20 | Top 35% | Caucasian | 81.9% |
| 2011 | MA | 1950 | 3.70 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 95.3% |
| 2011 | NJ | 1950 | 3.45 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 90.2% |
| 2011 | PA | 1930 | 3.78 | Top 15% | Caucasian | 95.6% |
| 2011 | CA | 1920 | 3.70 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 94.1% |
| 2011 | GA | 1910 | 3.60 | Top 20% | African-American | 91.5% |
| 2011 | NV | 1860 | 2.80 | Unknown | Caucasian | 36.8% |
| 2011 | MD | 1850 | 3.86 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 93.8% |
| 2011 | NJ | 1840 | 2.50 | Bottom 50% | Caucasian | 16.1% |
| 2011 | NY | 1800 | 3.20 | Top 40% | Caucasian | 55.9% |
| 2011 | FL | 1670 | 3.67 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 96.7% |
| 2011 | CT | 1380 | 2.50 | Unknown | None Indicated | 0.5% |
| 2011 | FL | 1300 | 3.00 | Top 10% | African-American | 69.2% |
| 2011 | LA | 36 | 3.70 | Top 5% | South Asian | 99.9% |
| 2011 | WA | 36 | 3.70 | Unknown | Caucasian | 99.9% |
| 2011 | IL | 34 | 4.00 | Top 5% | Hispanic | 99.8% |
| 2011 | MA | 32 | 3.30 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 96.1% |
| 2011 | PA | 30 | 3.20 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 87.2% |
| 2011 | TN | 30 | 3.90 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 98.4% |
| 2011 | AL | 29 | 4.00 | Top 1% | Caucasian | 98.1% |
| 2011 | OH | 29 | 3.79 | Class Not Ranked | African-American | 96.4% |
| 2011 | KS | 28 | 3.80 | Top 2% | Caucasian | 94.5% |
| 2010 | (Private) | 2400 | 4.00 | Unknown | Caucasian | 99.9% |
| 2010 | MA | 2400 | 3.74 | Top 10% | East Asian | 99.9% |
| 2010 | FL | 2390 | 3.75 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 99.9% |
| 2010 | NY | 2340 | 4.00 | Top 1% | Caucasian | 99.9% |
| 2010 | MA | 2340 | 3.75 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 99.8% |
| 2010 | XX | 2310 | 3.98 | Top 1% | None Indicated | 99.9% |
| 2010 | TN | 2300 | 4.00 | Top 1% | Caucasian | 99.9% |
| 2010 | MA | 2300 | 3.91 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 99.8% |
| 2010 | NY | 2300 | 3.86 | Top 2% | Caucasian | 99.8% |
| 2010 | CA | 2300 | 4.00 | Top 1% | Caucasian | 99.9% |
| 2010 | MP | 2290 | 3.20 | Top 25% | Caucasian | 98.4% |
| 2010 | NY | 2290 | 3.76 | Top 10% | East Asian | 99.7% |
| 2010 | TN | 2280 | 3.90 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 99.9% |
| 2010 | NJ | 2280 | 3.83 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 99.8% |
| 2010 | PR | 2280 | 3.11 | Top 30% | Hispanic | 97.8% |
| 2010 | CA | 2270 | 3.98 | Top 1% | Caucasian | 99.8% |
| 2010 | MD | 2260 | 3.58 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 99.4% |
| 2010 | (Private) | 2250 | 3.70 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 99.6% |
| 2010 | FL | 2250 | 3.90 | Top 5% | Hispanic | 99.8% |
| 2010 | NJ | 2250 | 3.60 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 99.4% |
| 2010 | MD | 2250 | 3.50 | Class Not Ranked | African-American | 99.2% |
| 2010 | CO | 2240 | 3.98 | Top 5% | East Asian | 99.8% |
| 2010 | MA | 2230 | 3.70 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 99.5% |
| 2010 | CA | 2230 | 3.59 | Class Not Ranked | None Indicated | 99.3% |
| 2010 | MD | 2230 | 3.76 | Top 15% | Caucasian | 99.6% |
| 2010 | XX | 2210 | 3.84 | Top 5% | East Asian | 99.6% |
| 2010 | XX | 2200 | 4.00 | Top 5% | East Asian | 99.7% |
| 2010 | CT | 2200 | 3.25 | Top 30% | East Asian | 97.3% |
| 2010 | MD | 2200 | 4.00 | Top 1% | Caucasian | 99.7% |
| 2010 | GA | 2180 | 3.75 | Top 3% | Other | 99.4% |
| 2010 | (Private) | 2180 | 4.00 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 99.7% |
| 2010 | PA | 2180 | 4.00 | Salutatorian | Caucasian | 99.7% |
| 2010 | NY | 2180 | 3.85 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 99.5% |
| 2010 | TX | 2170 | 3.36 | Top 30% | Caucasian | 97.6% |
| 2010 | NJ | 2170 | 3.50 | Top 25% | Caucasian | 98.4% |
| 2010 | WV | 2170 | 3.59 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 98.8% |
| 2010 | MO | 2170 | 2.90 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 90.4% |
| 2010 | TX | 2170 | 3.99 | Top 1% | Caucasian | 99.7% |
| 2010 | OH | 2160 | 3.23 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 96.1% |
| 2010 | GA | 2150 | 3.80 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 99.5% |
| 2010 | CA | 2150 | 3.40 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 97.5% |
| 2010 | NY | 2150 | 3.30 | Unknown | South Asian | 96.6% |
| 2010 | XX | 2150 | 3.30 | Class Not Ranked | East Asian | 96.6% |
| 2010 | VA | 2140 | 3.75 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 99.1% |
| 2010 | MA | 2140 | 3.34 | Unknown | East Asian | 96.7% |
| 2010 | LA | 2130 | 3.60 | Bottom 50% | Caucasian | 98.4% |
| 2010 | CA | 2120 | 3.75 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 99.7% |
| 2010 | FL | 2120 | 3.98 | Top 3% | Caucasian | 99.5% |
| 2010 | CO | 2120 | 3.96 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 99.4% |
| 2010 | MO | 2110 | 3.40 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 98.2% |
| 2010 | NJ | 2110 | 3.50 | Top 15% | Caucasian | 97.5% |
| 2010 | AL | 2100 | 3.90 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 99.4% |
| 2010 | CT | 2100 | 3.60 | Unknown | None Indicated | 98.0% |
| 2010 | NY | 2100 | 4.00 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 99.4% |
| 2010 | FL | 2090 | 3.63 | Class Not Ranked | East Asian | 99.1% |
| 2010 | NY | 2080 | 3.30 | Class Not Ranked | Hispanic | 94.2% |
| 2010 | OH | 2080 | 3.83 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 98.8% |
| 2010 | MD | 2080 | 3.40 | Unknown | Caucasian | 95.7% |
| 2010 | SD | 2060 | 4.00 | Valedictorian | Caucasian | 99.5% |
| 2010 | TX | 2060 | 4.00 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 99.3% |
| 2010 | LA | 2060 | 3.75 | Top 30% | Caucasian | 98.3% |
| 2010 | FL | 2060 | 3.50 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 96.3% |
| 2010 | (Private) | 2060 | 3.95 | Valedictorian | Caucasian | 99.1% |
| 2010 | TX | 2060 | 3.70 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 98.0% |
| 2010 | (Private) | 2050 | 3.50 | Top 15% | Caucasian | 98.7% |
| 2010 | CA | 2050 | 3.00 | Bottom 40% | Hispanic | 83.2% |
| 2010 | PA | 2050 | 3.78 | Top 2% | Caucasian | 98.3% |
| 2010 | DE | 2050 | 2.50 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 50.8% |
| 2010 | MA | 2040 | 3.50 | Unknown | Caucasian | 95.7% |
| 2010 | MD | 2030 | 3.92 | Unknown | Caucasian | 99.4% |
| 2010 | PA | 2030 | 3.40 | Top 40% | Caucasian | 93.8% |
| 2010 | NY | 2030 | 3.50 | Class Not Ranked | African-American | 95.4% |
| 2010 | LA | 2030 | 3.90 | Top 15% | Caucasian | 98.6% |
| 2010 | NH | 2030 | 3.75 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 97.8% |
| 2010 | CA | 2020 | 3.77 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 99.8% |
| 2010 | (Private) | 2020 | 3.90 | Top 5% | None Indicated | 99.0% |
| 2010 | NJ | 2020 | 3.20 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 88.0% |
| 2010 | MD | 2020 | 4.00 | Salutatorian | Caucasian | 98.9% |
| 2010 | CA | 2020 | 3.40 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 93.2% |
| 2010 | CA | 2010 | 3.90 | Top 4% | Caucasian | 98.4% |
| 2010 | NJ | 2010 | 3.20 | Unknown | Caucasian | 87.2% |
| 2010 | TX | 2000 | 3.85 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 98.8% |
| 2010 | SC | 2000 | 3.70 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 97.0% |
| 2010 | NY | 2000 | 4.00 | Top 5% | East Asian | 98.8% |
| 2010 | DE | 2000 | 3.50 | Top 10% | African-American | 94.2% |
| 2010 | FL | 2000 | 3.75 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 97.3% |
| 2010 | WI | 1990 | 3.60 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 97.5% |
| 2010 | KS | 1990 | 3.00 | Unknown | Caucasian | 85.4% |
| 2010 | FL | 1990 | 3.93 | Top 2% | Caucasian | 98.5% |
| 2010 | PA | 1990 | 3.50 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 93.7% |
| 2010 | NJ | 1990 | 3.60 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 95.3% |
| 2010 | IN | 1990 | 3.82 | Top 10% | None Indicated | 97.6% |
| 2010 | NY | 1980 | 3.50 | Top 15% | Caucasian | 94.6% |
| 2010 | MD | 1980 | 3.50 | Unknown | Caucasian | 93.2% |
| 2010 | LA | 1970 | 3.00 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 72.7% |
| 2010 | PA | 1970 | 3.45 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 91.6% |
| 2010 | NJ | 1970 | 3.20 | Unknown | Caucasian | 83.3% |
| 2010 | PA | 1960 | 3.75 | Top 15% | Caucasian | 96.2% |
| 2010 | DE | 1960 | 3.91 | Top 3% | East Asian | 97.7% |
| 2010 | NC | 1950 | 3.70 | Top 15% | Caucasian | 97.0% |
| 2010 | NC | 1950 | 4.00 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 98.1% |
| 2010 | MA | 1950 | 3.80 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 96.5% |
| 2010 | DE | 1950 | 3.20 | Top 30% | Caucasian | 80.8% |
| 2010 | TX | 1940 | 3.30 | Top 35% | East Asian | 90.3% |
| 2010 | XX | 1940 | 3.60 | Top 10% | East Asian | 93.2% |
| 2010 | NY | 1940 | 3.70 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 95.0% |
| 2010 | MA | 1940 | 3.40 | Top 30% | Caucasian | 88.0% |
| 2010 | MO | 1930 | 3.80 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 99.2% |
| 2010 | DE | 1930 | 4.00 | Top 25% | Caucasian | 99.3% |
| 2010 | MD | 1930 | 3.00 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 78.4% |
| 2010 | TX | 1930 | 3.70 | Top 15% | South Asian | 94.5% |
| 2010 | MA | 1930 | 3.30 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 83.0% |
| 2010 | OH | 1930 | 3.65 | Top 25% | Caucasian | 93.6% |
| 2010 | TX | 1930 | 3.34 | Top 30% | East Asian | 84.7% |
| 2010 | PA | 1920 | 3.60 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 92.1% |
| 2010 | MA | 1920 | 3.50 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 89.5% |
| 2010 | MA | 1920 | 3.64 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 92.9% |
| 2010 | NJ | 1910 | 3.60 | Top 25% | Caucasian | 91.5% |
| 2010 | NJ | 1910 | 3.37 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 84.0% |
| 2010 | FL | 1900 | 3.54 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 89.1% |
| 2010 | FL | 1900 | 3.20 | Top 40% | Hispanic | 73.7% |
| 2010 | ME | 1900 | 3.63 | Top 30% | Caucasian | 91.5% |
| 2010 | WI | 1890 | 3.38 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 92.3% |
| 2010 | TN | 1890 | 3.40 | Top 40% | Caucasian | 88.7% |
| 2010 | FL | 1890 | 3.70 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 95.3% |
| 2010 | VA | 1890 | 2.50 | Class Not Ranked | East Asian | 22.4% |
| 2010 | NY | 1880 | 3.64 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 90.6% |
| 2010 | NY | 1880 | 3.95 | Top 20% | Other | 96.2% |
| 2010 | GA | 1870 | 3.82 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 93.9% |
| 2010 | (Private) | 1870 | 3.60 | Top 10% | East Asian | 88.5% |
| 2010 | CA | 1870 | 3.78 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 93.1% |
| 2010 | FL | 1870 | 3.50 | Unknown | Caucasian | 85.0% |
| 2010 | TN | 1860 | 3.99 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 98.8% |
| 2010 | NY | 1850 | 3.52 | Class Not Ranked | Hispanic | 87.7% |
| 2010 | GA | 1850 | 3.60 | Top 40% | Hispanic | 87.0% |
| 2010 | NM | 1850 | 3.80 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 92.6% |
| 2010 | TN | 1840 | 3.91 | Top 15% | Caucasian | 98.4% |
| 2010 | TX | 1840 | 3.72 | Top 3% | Hispanic | 89.9% |
| 2010 | CA | 1820 | 3.95 | Top 1% | Caucasian | 96.5% |
| 2010 | NJ | 1820 | 3.49 | Top 10% | African-American | 78.8% |
| 2010 | CA | 1820 | 3.80 | Unknown | Caucasian | 90.8% |
| 2010 | FL | 1810 | 3.45 | Top 15% | South Asian | 85.1% |
| 2010 | IL | 1810 | 3.39 | Unknown | Other | 74.5% |
| 2010 | MA | 1810 | 3.50 | Unknown | Caucasian | 77.7% |
| 2010 | XX | 1800 | 3.70 | Class Not Ranked | Hispanic | 85.9% |
| 2010 | TX | 1800 | 3.69 | Top 25% | Caucasian | 85.5% |
| 2010 | MA | 1790 | 3.23 | Top 35% | Caucasian | 56.4% |
| 2010 | WA | 1770 | 3.33 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 60.0% |
| 2010 | CA | 1770 | 3.23 | Unknown | East Asian | 52.3% |
| 2010 | CA | 1760 | 3.69 | Top 25% | East Asian | 98.1% |
| 2010 | NE | 1750 | 3.20 | Bottom 50% | Caucasian | 72.3% |
| 2010 | MA | 1750 | 2.80 | Top 35% | Caucasian | 31.5% |
| 2010 | LA | 1740 | 3.92 | Top 10% | African-American | 91.5% |
| 2010 | FL | 1740 | 3.60 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 79.8% |
| 2010 | CA | 1740 | 3.30 | Bottom 50% | African-American | 60.6% |
| 2010 | MI | 1730 | 3.60 | Unknown | Caucasian | 71.9% |
| 2010 | CA | 1730 | 3.60 | Top 20% | East Asian | 71.9% |
| 2010 | CA | 1720 | 3.87 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 84.4% |
| 2010 | NJ | 1710 | 3.50 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 61.3% |
| 2010 | CA | 1690 | 2.70 | Unknown | South Asian | 35.1% |
| 2010 | CT | 1650 | 3.50 | Top 25% | Caucasian | 49.5% |
| 2010 | WA | 1640 | 3.34 | Bottom 50% | South Asian | 51.9% |
| 2010 | FL | 1640 | 3.34 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 35.5% |
| 2010 | SC | 1600 | 3.75 | Top 20% | African-American | 86.3% |
| 2010 | NJ | 1590 | 4.00 | Top 1% | Hispanic | 74.4% |
| 2010 | FL | 1580 | 3.08 | Top 10% | Hispanic | 13.1% |
| 2010 | FL | 1560 | 3.63 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 72.8% |
| 2010 | FL | 1300 | 3.10 | Bottom 50% | Caucasian | 75.5% |
| 2010 | FL | 26 | 3.26 | Top 40% | Middle-Eastern | 57.6% |
| 2010 | IN | 34 | 3.83 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 99.7% |
| 2010 | TX | 33 | 3.50 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 98.7% |
| 2010 | TN | 33 | 3.84 | Top 20% | East Asian | 99.5% |
| 2010 | OH | 33 | 3.70 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 99.3% |
| 2010 | VA | 33 | 3.79 | Unknown | Caucasian | 99.5% |
| 2010 | IL | 33 | 3.40 | Top 25% | East Asian | 98.2% |
| 2010 | CA | 33 | 3.70 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 99.3% |
| 2010 | NH | 33 | 3.80 | Top 1% | Caucasian | 99.5% |
| 2010 | IL | 32 | 3.03 | Unknown | African-American | 91.2% |
| 2010 | NJ | 32 | 0.00 | Top 1% | Caucasian | 0.1% |
| 2010 | (Private) | 32 | 3.10 | Class Not Ranked | East Asian | 92.8% |
| 2010 | PA | 31 | 3.49 | Class Not Ranked | South Asian | 96.5% |
| 2010 | VA | 31 | 3.70 | Class Not Ranked | East Asian | 98.1% |
| 2010 | IL | 31 | 3.30 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 93.8% |
| 2010 | OK | 31 | 3.85 | Top 5% | Hispanic | 98.8% |
| 2010 | MN | 30 | 3.70 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 97.0% |
| 2010 | LA | 30 | 3.89 | Unknown | Hispanic | 98.3% |
| 2010 | LA | 30 | 3.29 | Top 25% | Caucasian | 90.0% |
| 2010 | DC | 30 | 3.50 | Class Not Ranked | East Asian | 94.6% |
| 2010 | WA | 30 | 3.56 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 95.5% |
| 2010 | IL | 29 | 3.60 | Top 25% | Caucasian | 93.7% |
| 2010 | MO | 29 | 3.93 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 97.7% |
| 2010 | NY | 29 | 2.80 | Class Not Ranked | South Asian | 54.5% |
| 2010 | OR | 28 | 3.75 | Top 30% | Other | 93.6% |
| 2010 | MA | 28 | 3.10 | Unknown | Caucasian | 65.5% |
| 2010 | NY | 28 | 3.30 | Top 35% | Hispanic | 78.1% |
| 2010 | CA | 28 | 3.50 | Top 40% | Caucasian | 87.0% |
| 2010 | LA | 28 | 3.60 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 90.1% |
| 2010 | NY | 28 | 3.50 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 87.0% |
| 2010 | IL | 28 | 3.69 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 92.4% |
| 2010 | NJ | 27 | 3.50 | Top 25% | Caucasian | 80.5% |
| 2010 | IN | 27 | 3.30 | Class Not Ranked | African-American | 68.8% |
| 2010 | MI | 27 | 3.50 | Top 25% | Caucasian | 80.5% |
| 2010 | CA | 27 | 3.60 | Unknown | None Indicated | 85.0% |
| 2010 | XX | 26 | 3.77 | Top 20% | East Asian | 87.1% |
| 2010 | GA | 26 | 3.60 | Unknown | Caucasian | 79.8% |
| 2010 | LA | 25 | 3.40 | Class Not Ranked | African-American | 56.6% |
| 2010 | TX | 25 | 3.81 | Top 15% | African-American | 82.5% |
| 2010 | NJ | 25 | 3.40 | Unknown | South Asian | 56.6% |
| 2010 | LA | 25 | 3.60 | Top 25% | Caucasian | 70.9% |
| 2010 | LA | 24 | 3.55 | Top 10% | East Asian | 56.3% |
| 2009 | FL | 2380 | 3.92 | Top 5% | None Indicated | 99.9% |
| 2009 | NJ | 2370 | 3.79 | Top 5% | East Asian | 99.9% |
| 2009 | TX | 2300 | 3.44 | Top 10% | Hispanic | 99.3% |
| 2009 | CA | 2280 | 3.91 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 99.8% |
| 2009 | NY | 2280 | 3.73 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 99.7% |
| 2009 | CA | 2270 | 3.90 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 99.9% |
| 2009 | NJ | 2270 | 3.98 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 99.8% |
| 2009 | XX | 2260 | 3.86 | Top 5% | East Asian | 99.8% |
| 2009 | (Private) | 2220 | 3.60 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 99.2% |
| 2009 | TN | 2210 | 3.50 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 98.9% |
| 2009 | OH | 2180 | 3.30 | Top 30% | Caucasian | 97.5% |
| 2009 | MS | 2180 | 3.85 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 99.5% |
| 2009 | XX | 2180 | 4.00 | Top 1% | None Indicated | 99.7% |
| 2009 | NY | 2180 | 3.40 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 98.0% |
| 2009 | LA | 2170 | 3.88 | Top 1% | South Asian | 99.5% |
| 2009 | LA | 2170 | 3.87 | Top 1% | South Asian | 99.5% |
| 2009 | NJ | 2170 | 4.00 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 99.7% |
| 2009 | AL | 2160 | 3.50 | Unknown | Caucasian | 98.3% |
| 2009 | (Private) | 2150 | 3.90 | Unknown | None Indicated | 99.5% |
| 2009 | CA | 2140 | 4.00 | Valedictorian | East Asian | 99.7% |
| 2009 | CA | 2140 | 3.90 | Unknown | None Indicated | 99.4% |
| 2009 | VA | 2130 | 3.90 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 99.4% |
| 2009 | CA | 2130 | 3.55 | Class Not Ranked | Other | 98.2% |
| 2009 | NJ | 2120 | 3.90 | Top 5% | Middle-Eastern | 99.4% |
| 2009 | OH | 2110 | 3.78 | Top 30% | Caucasian | 98.9% |
| 2009 | (Private) | 2110 | 3.20 | Bottom 50% | None Indicated | 93.8% |
| 2009 | (Private) | 2100 | 3.57 | Class Not Ranked | South Asian | 97.8% |
| 2009 | CA | 2100 | 3.55 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 97.7% |
| 2009 | MD | 2100 | 3.60 | Top 10% | None Indicated | 98.0% |
| 2009 | SC | 2080 | 3.65 | Top 30% | Caucasian | 98.0% |
| 2009 | MA | 2080 | 3.85 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 98.9% |
| 2009 | FL | 2080 | 3.20 | Top 20% | Other | 92.2% |
| 2009 | CA | 2080 | 3.60 | Unknown | None Indicated | 97.6% |
| 2009 | CA | 2070 | 3.50 | Unknown | Caucasian | 96.6% |
| 2009 | CA | 2070 | 3.87 | Top 10% | East Asian | 98.9% |
| 2009 | OH | 2060 | 2.80 | Unknown | African-American | 74.5% |
| 2009 | FL | 2050 | 3.48 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 95.7% |
| 2009 | MD | 2040 | 3.70 | Class Not Ranked | Hispanic | 97.7% |
| 2009 | (Private) | 2040 | 3.00 | Top 40% | Caucasian | 82.2% |
| 2009 | (Private) | 2030 | 3.50 | Unknown | Caucasian | 95.4% |
| 2009 | NH | 2020 | 3.80 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 98.0% |
| 2009 | IL | 2010 | 3.60 | Top 30% | Caucasian | 96.0% |
| 2009 | VA | 2010 | 3.69 | Class Not Ranked | Hispanic | 96.9% |
| 2009 | VA | 2010 | 3.69 | Class Not Ranked | Hispanic | 96.9% |
| 2009 | (Private) | 2010 | 3.67 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 96.7% |
| 2009 | NY | 2010 | 3.52 | Top 20% | Middle-Eastern | 94.9% |
| 2009 | CA | 2000 | 3.81 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 97.9% |
| 2009 | XX | 2000 | 4.00 | Valedictorian | East Asian | 98.7% |
| 2009 | OH | 2000 | 3.60 | Class Not Ranked | East Asian | 95.7% |
| 2009 | MA | 2000 | 3.40 | Top 30% | Caucasian | 92.2% |
| 2009 | MA | 2000 | 3.59 | Top 30% | Caucasian | 95.6% |
| 2009 | (Private) | 1990 | 3.15 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 83.1% |
| 2009 | NC | 1990 | 4.00 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 98.6% |
| 2009 | NY | 1980 | 3.30 | Class Not Ranked | Hispanic | 88.0% |
| 2009 | TX | 1980 | 3.40 | Top 10% | Hispanic | 90.9% |
| 2009 | RI | 1980 | 3.90 | Top 5% | Middle-Eastern | 98.0% |
| 2009 | TX | 1970 | 3.90 | Top 5% | South Asian | 97.8% |
| 2009 | TX | 1970 | 4.00 | Top 20% | South Asian | 98.4% |
| 2009 | CA | 1950 | 3.56 | Unknown | Caucasian | 92.9% |
| 2009 | NY | 1950 | 3.40 | Unknown | African-American | 88.7% |
| 2009 | TX | 1930 | 3.43 | Top 20% | East Asian | 88.0% |
| 2009 | FL | 1920 | 3.48 | Top 20% | Hispanic | 88.9% |
| 2009 | MA | 1920 | 3.50 | Top 30% | Caucasian | 89.5% |
| 2009 | NJ | 1910 | 3.75 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 94.5% |
| 2009 | NJ | 1910 | 3.40 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 85.2% |
| 2009 | MS | 1890 | 2.50 | Bottom 30% | None Indicated | 55.0% |
| 2009 | (Private) | 1890 | 3.20 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 72.3% |
| 2009 | CO | 1880 | 3.20 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 70.8% |
| 2009 | XX | 1880 | 3.37 | Top 20% | African-American | 80.5% |
| 2009 | NJ | 1880 | 3.50 | Top 30% | East Asian | 86.1% |
| 2009 | AL | 1870 | 3.49 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 97.8% |
| 2009 | CA | 1870 | 3.50 | Bottom 50% | Hispanic | 85.0% |
| 2009 | CA | 1860 | 3.60 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 87.8% |
| 2009 | CO | 1860 | 3.30 | Unknown | Caucasian | 73.7% |
| 2009 | NJ | 1850 | 3.10 | Class Not Ranked | East Asian | 58.2% |
| 2009 | GA | 1850 | 3.06 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 55.1% |
| 2009 | NY | 1850 | 3.50 | Top 30% | Caucasian | 83.0% |
| 2009 | MD | 1850 | 3.50 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 83.0% |
| 2009 | FL | 1840 | 3.67 | Top 20% | None Indicated | 94.8% |
| 2009 | NY | 1840 | 3.15 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 59.7% |
| 2009 | MD | 1830 | 3.35 | Top 20% | None Indicated | 72.1% |
| 2009 | ME | 1820 | 4.00 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 97.0% |
| 2009 | XX | 1810 | 3.60 | Top 20% | Hispanic | 82.7% |
| 2009 | CA | 1800 | 3.40 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 70.4% |
| 2009 | NJ | 1800 | 3.75 | Top 20% | East Asian | 87.7% |
| 2009 | LA | 1780 | 2.70 | Unknown | Caucasian | 25.1% |
| 2009 | FL | 1770 | 3.40 | Top 30% | African-American | 65.1% |
| 2009 | NJ | 1740 | 3.00 | Class Not Ranked | Hispanic | 29.5% |
| 2009 | MD | 1740 | 3.40 | Class Not Ranked | East Asian | 59.5% |
| 2009 | MI | 1710 | 3.30 | Top 10% | Middle-Eastern | 45.8% |
| 2009 | FL | 1680 | 3.20 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 41.0% |
| 2009 | TX | 1630 | 3.33 | Top 40% | African-American | 32.7% |
| 2009 | CT | 1620 | 3.79 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 65.7% |
| 2009 | TX | 1590 | 3.30 | Top 30% | Hispanic | 37.1% |
| 2009 | NJ | 1380 | 2.99 | Class Not Ranked | Other | 2.2% |
| 2009 | XX | 1350 | 3.70 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 97.4% |
| 2009 | NY | 33 | 3.75 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 99.4% |
| 2009 | CA | 33 | 3.50 | Top 10% | South Asian | 98.7% |
| 2009 | TN | 32 | 3.70 | Top 20% | East Asian | 98.8% |
| 2009 | MI | 31 | 3.77 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 98.5% |
| 2009 | FL | 31 | 3.50 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 96.6% |
| 2009 | VA | 31 | 3.60 | Top 5% | Other | 97.5% |
| 2009 | IL | 31 | 3.58 | Unknown | Caucasian | 97.3% |
| 2009 | GA | 30 | 3.56 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 95.5% |
| 2009 | TN | 30 | 3.70 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 97.0% |
| 2009 | (Private) | 30 | 3.93 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 98.5% |
| 2009 | MN | 30 | 3.90 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 98.4% |
| 2009 | LA | 29 | 2.78 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 53.0% |
| 2009 | LA | 29 | 3.75 | Unknown | Caucasian | 95.9% |
| 2009 | GA | 29 | 3.45 | Class Not Ranked | African-American | 90.2% |
| 2009 | NJ | 27 | 3.00 | Top 40% | Caucasian | 46.2% |
| 2009 | TN | 27 | 3.55 | Top 20% | None Indicated | 82.9% |
| 2009 | IL | 27 | 3.56 | Top 20% | African-American | 83.3% |
| 2009 | NJ | 26 | 3.50 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 74.2% |
| 2009 | NC | 25 | 3.20 | Top 40% | Hispanic | 41.0% |
| 2009 | KY | 25 | 3.40 | Class Not Ranked | Hispanic | 56.6% |
| 2009 | MO | 24 | 3.46 | Unknown | Caucasian | 49.3% |
| 2008 | TX | 2340 | 4.00 | Unknown | East Asian | 99.9% |
| 2008 | MA | 2340 | 2.70 | Unknown | Hispanic | 95.2% |
| 2008 | MA | 2340 | 3.10 | Unknown | Hispanic | 98.6% |
| 2008 | KY | 2300 | 3.56 | Top 20% | Other | 99.5% |
| 2008 | CA | 2270 | 3.50 | Unknown | East Asian | 99.3% |
| 2008 | GA | 2250 | 3.89 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 99.8% |
| 2008 | NY | 2240 | 3.60 | Unknown | Caucasian | 99.5% |
| 2008 | CA | 2230 | 3.75 | Unknown | Caucasian | 99.5% |
| 2008 | CA | 2230 | 3.80 | Unknown | South Asian | 99.6% |
| 2008 | FL | 2220 | 4.00 | Top 5% | Hispanic | 99.8% |
| 2008 | IL | 2160 | 4.00 | Top 1% | Caucasian | 99.8% |
| 2008 | CA | 2150 | 3.15 | Unknown | East Asian | 94.7% |
| 2008 | NY | 2130 | 4.00 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 99.5% |
| 2008 | NC | 2090 | 3.14 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 91.5% |
| 2008 | CA | 2090 | 3.93 | Unknown | Caucasian | 99.2% |
| 2008 | MA | 2090 | 3.40 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 96.1% |
| 2008 | MA | 2090 | 3.40 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 96.1% |
| 2008 | NC | 2060 | 2.90 | Bottom 50% | Caucasian | 80.0% |
| 2008 | TX | 2040 | 3.90 | Top 5% | Other | 99.6% |
| 2008 | LA | 2040 | 3.40 | Unknown | Caucasian | 94.2% |
| 2008 | XX | 2040 | 3.50 | Unknown | Caucasian | 95.7% |
| 2008 | CT | 2030 | 3.10 | Top 40% | Hispanic | 85.5% |
| 2008 | CA | 2020 | 3.42 | Top 20% | East Asian | 93.6% |
| 2008 | OH | 2010 | 3.81 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 97.9% |
| 2008 | MD | 2000 | 3.54 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 94.8% |
| 2008 | CT | 2000 | 4.00 | Valedictorian | East Asian | 98.7% |
| 2008 | VA | 1990 | 3.85 | Top 5% | Other | 97.8% |
| 2008 | OR | 1990 | 3.80 | Valedictorian | Caucasian | 97.4% |
| 2008 | NY | 1980 | 4.00 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 98.8% |
| 2008 | NJ | 1970 | 3.60 | Unknown | Caucasian | 94.6% |
| 2008 | NJ | 1950 | 3.50 | Top 20% | Other | 91.5% |
| 2008 | NY | 1940 | 4.00 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 98.0% |
| 2008 | OH | 1930 | 3.67 | Class Not Ranked | Middle-Eastern | 94.8% |
| 2008 | CA | 1930 | 3.10 | Unknown | African-American | 72.2% |
| 2008 | OH | 1920 | 3.30 | Valedictorian | Middle-Eastern | 90.3% |
| 2008 | RI | 1910 | 3.33 | Unknown | None Indicated | 82.2% |
| 2008 | (Private) | 1900 | 3.80 | Top 5% | Native American | 94.8% |
| 2008 | NY | 1900 | 3.90 | Top 1% | None Indicated | 96.2% |
| 2008 | VA | 1870 | 2.90 | Class Not Ranked | None Indicated | 46.2% |
| 2008 | CA | 1870 | 3.50 | Unknown | Hispanic | 85.0% |
| 2008 | MA | 1860 | 3.99 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 96.1% |
| 2008 | CT | 1860 | 3.20 | Unknown | Caucasian | 67.2% |
| 2008 | CA | 1820 | 3.50 | Unknown | Caucasian | 79.4% |
| 2008 | CT | 1820 | 2.70 | Unknown | Caucasian | 23.8% |
| 2008 | (Private) | 1800 | 2.80 | Class Not Ranked | None Indicated | 26.5% |
| 2008 | OK | 1780 | 4.00 | Unknown | Other | 93.0% |
| 2008 | (Private) | 1730 | 3.76 | Top 20% | None Indicated | 86.7% |
| 2008 | GA | 1520 | 3.50 | Top 20% | African-American | 25.8% |
| 2008 | MA | 1420 | 3.40 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 97.1% |
| 2008 | LA | 33 | 3.70 | Unknown | South Asian | 99.3% |
| 2008 | IL | 32 | 3.97 | Valedictorian | Caucasian | 99.5% |
| 2008 | MN | 32 | 3.85 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 99.3% |
| 2008 | IL | 31 | 3.95 | Top 1% | South Asian | 99.1% |
| 2008 | (Private) | 30 | 3.95 | Valedictorian | Caucasian | 98.6% |
| 2008 | PA | 28 | 3.50 | Unknown | Caucasian | 87.0% |
| 2008 | NY | 28 | 3.10 | Top 30% | None Indicated | 65.5% |
| 2008 | NY | 28 | 3.00 | Top 40% | Caucasian | 58.2% |
| 2008 | MA | 28 | 3.65 | Top 10% | None Indicated | 91.4% |
| 2008 | IA | 28 | 3.70 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 92.6% |
| 2008 | IL | 27 | 3.87 | Unknown | Caucasian | 93.0% |
| 2008 | AL | 27 | 3.02 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 47.8% |
| 2008 | NY | 27 | 3.70 | Top 10% | East Asian | 88.6% |
| 2007 | LA | 2400 | 4.00 | Valedictorian | Caucasian | 99.9% |
| 2007 | LA | 2310 | 4.00 | Valedictorian | Caucasian | 99.9% |
| 2007 | HI | 1910 | 3.81 | Top 5% | South Asian | 98.7% |
| 2007 | NJ | 1870 | 3.78 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 93.1% |
| 2007 | IL | 28 | 3.60 | Top 20% | African-American | 90.1% |
| 2006 | PA | 1750 | 3.20 | Unknown | Caucasian | 45.7% |
| 2002 | MI | 2290 | 4.00 | Valedictorian | Caucasian | 99.9% |
| |