Tulane University Applications and Decisions
Below is a list of applicants who have demonstrated interest in Tulane University. Our best formula
for this college is based on
266 members who were accepted or rejected. The formula
has a college admissions prediction accuracy of
96%?.
Because not all members have filled out the most recent version of our survey, some predictions are made based on
less-accurate models. Those are noted with an asterisk (*) next to their prediction.
This is a very popular school, so we're only showing you profiles that have received an admissions decision. If you
want to see all applicants to this school,
click here (caution: the page will take awhile to load).
|
| 2009 | TX | 2130 | 3.73 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 98.9% |
| 2009 | CA | 2070 | 3.61 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 97.6% |
| 2009 | MD | 2060 | 3.71 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 98.1% |
| 2009 | (Private) | 2010 | 3.60 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 96.0% |
| 2009 | ID | 2000 | 3.78 | Top 25% | None Indicated | 97.7% |
| 2009 | LA | 1860 | 3.50 | Class Not Ranked | Other | 84.0% |
| 2009 | LA | 34 | 4.00 | Valedictorian | African-American | 99.8% |
| 2009 | NY | 31 | 3.80 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 98.6% |
| 2009 | VA | 30 | 3.68 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 96.8% |
| 2008 | VA | 2290 | 3.35 | Class Not Ranked | East Asian | 99.0% |
| 2008 | MN | 2200 | 3.65 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 99.2% |
| 2008 | FL | 2130 | 3.80 | Top 5% | None Indicated | 99.5% |
| 2008 | CA | 2010 | 3.20 | Unknown | Caucasian | 87.2% |
| 2008 | IN | 32 | 3.75 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 99.0% |
| 2007 | CO | 2060 | 3.40 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 95.0% |
|
| 2011 | VA | 2010 | 3.90 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 98.4% |
| 2011 | PA | 1930 | 3.50 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 90.1% |
| 2010 | CO | 2370 | 3.90 | Class Not Ranked | East Asian | 99.9% |
| 2010 | (Private) | 2350 | 3.40 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 99.5% |
| 2010 | KS | 2340 | 3.55 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 99.7% |
| 2010 | MA | 2340 | 4.00 | Top 1% | Caucasian | 99.9% |
| 2010 | VA | 2330 | 3.70 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 99.8% |
| 2010 | FL | 2320 | 3.94 | Valedictorian | Caucasian | 99.9% |
| 2010 | CA | 2320 | 3.67 | Top 10% | South Asian | 99.7% |
| 2010 | VA | 2310 | 4.00 | Top 4% | African-American | 99.9% |
| 2010 | FL | 2310 | 3.49 | Top 10% | Hispanic | 99.5% |
| 2010 | NJ | 2310 | 3.81 | Class Not Ranked | South Asian | 99.8% |
| 2010 | (Private) | 2300 | 3.70 | Top 15% | East Asian | 99.7% |
| 2010 | NY | 2300 | 3.89 | Unknown | East Asian | 99.8% |
| 2010 | MD | 2280 | 4.00 | Top 2% | Caucasian | 99.9% |
| 2010 | (Private) | 2280 | 4.00 | Top 2% | Caucasian | 99.9% |
| 2010 | CA | 2270 | 3.80 | Class Not Ranked | None Indicated | 99.8% |
| 2010 | FL | 2270 | 3.72 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 99.6% |
| 2010 | MT | 2270 | 3.91 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 99.8% |
| 2010 | MA | 2270 | 3.20 | Unknown | Caucasian | 98.2% |
| 2010 | PA | 2270 | 4.00 | Valedictorian | Caucasian | 99.9% |
| 2010 | NY | 2250 | 4.00 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 99.8% |
| 2010 | PA | 2240 | 3.76 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 99.6% |
| 2010 | GA | 2230 | 3.80 | Top 10% | South Asian | 99.6% |
| 2010 | CT | 2230 | 3.76 | Top 1% | East Asian | 99.6% |
| 2010 | CT | 2210 | 3.20 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 99.0% |
| 2010 | IL | 2200 | 3.10 | Top 30% | Caucasian | 98.6% |
| 2010 | NY | 2200 | 3.70 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 99.3% |
| 2010 | PA | 2200 | 3.92 | Top 1% | Other | 99.7% |
| 2010 | OH | 2200 | 3.70 | Class Not Ranked | Other | 99.3% |
| 2010 | VA | 2200 | 3.84 | Top 2% | Caucasian | 99.6% |
| 2010 | CA | 2180 | 3.87 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 99.6% |
| 2010 | MD | 2180 | 3.75 | Top 5% | East Asian | 99.3% |
| 2010 | MA | 2170 | 3.12 | Top 10% | None Indicated | 95.0% |
| 2010 | FL | 2170 | 3.80 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 99.4% |
| 2010 | FL | 2160 | 4.00 | Valedictorian | Caucasian | 99.8% |
| 2010 | FL | 2160 | 3.77 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 99.4% |
| 2010 | MD | 2160 | 4.00 | Top 2% | Caucasian | 99.6% |
| 2010 | CA | 2160 | 3.43 | Top 40% | East Asian | 97.9% |
| 2010 | OH | 2160 | 4.00 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 99.6% |
| 2010 | NY | 2150 | 3.90 | Top 10% | Hispanic | 99.5% |
| 2010 | CA | 2150 | 3.40 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 97.5% |
| 2010 | TX | 2140 | 3.82 | Top 3% | East Asian | 99.3% |
| 2010 | AZ | 2140 | 4.00 | Top 1% | None Indicated | 99.6% |
| 2010 | PA | 2140 | 3.50 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 98.0% |
| 2010 | CO | 2130 | 3.95 | Top 4% | Other | 99.5% |
| 2010 | (Private) | 2130 | 3.87 | Top 10% | None Indicated | 99.3% |
| 2010 | VA | 2130 | 3.50 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 97.9% |
| 2010 | (Private) | 2120 | 4.00 | Top 2% | Caucasian | 99.9% |
| 2010 | OH | 2120 | 3.95 | Top 1% | Caucasian | 99.8% |
| 2010 | SC | 2120 | 4.00 | Top 2% | Caucasian | 99.5% |
| 2010 | GA | 2120 | 3.65 | Top 15% | Caucasian | 98.6% |
| 2010 | OR | 2120 | 3.88 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 99.3% |
| 2010 | CA | 2120 | 3.69 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 98.7% |
| 2010 | FL | 2110 | 3.90 | Top 2% | Caucasian | 99.4% |
| 2010 | GA | 2110 | 4.00 | Top 1% | Caucasian | 99.5% |
| 2010 | VA | 2110 | 3.93 | Top 4% | Caucasian | 99.3% |
| 2010 | CA | 2110 | 3.46 | Unknown | Caucasian | 97.1% |
| 2010 | FL | 2110 | 3.89 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 99.2% |
| 2010 | NJ | 2110 | 3.74 | Top 10% | African-American | 98.8% |
| 2010 | NY | 2100 | 3.60 | Class Not Ranked | East Asian | 99.0% |
| 2010 | IN | 2100 | 4.00 | Valedictorian | East Asian | 99.7% |
| 2010 | MA | 2100 | 3.48 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 97.1% |
| 2010 | TX | 2100 | 3.50 | Top 20% | South Asian | 97.3% |
| 2010 | NJ | 2100 | 3.80 | Top 2% | East Asian | 98.9% |
| 2010 | MA | 2100 | 3.42 | Top 20% | None Indicated | 96.5% |
| 2010 | UT | 2090 | 3.82 | Top 15% | Caucasian | 99.2% |
| 2010 | (Private) | 2090 | 3.20 | Class Not Ranked | Hispanic | 92.9% |
| 2010 | IN | 2090 | 4.00 | Valedictorian | Caucasian | 99.4% |
| 2010 | FL | 2090 | 3.80 | Top 3% | Hispanic | 98.8% |
| 2010 | ME | 2090 | 3.84 | Top 3% | None Indicated | 99.0% |
| 2010 | VA | 2080 | 4.00 | Valedictorian | Caucasian | 99.9% |
| 2010 | TX | 2080 | 4.00 | Top 2% | Hispanic | 99.3% |
| 2010 | TX | 2080 | 3.90 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 99.1% |
| 2010 | NH | 2080 | 3.83 | Top 4% | Caucasian | 98.8% |
| 2010 | NC | 2080 | 3.90 | Salutatorian | Caucasian | 99.1% |
| 2010 | FL | 2070 | 3.90 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 99.4% |
| 2010 | VA | 2070 | 3.75 | Class Not Ranked | None Indicated | 98.4% |
| 2010 | TX | 2070 | 3.70 | Top 3% | South Asian | 98.1% |
| 2010 | CT | 2070 | 3.48 | Class Not Ranked | Hispanic | 96.4% |
| 2010 | NY | 2060 | 3.84 | Top 4% | Caucasian | 99.3% |
| 2010 | NC | 2060 | 3.75 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 98.3% |
| 2010 | NJ | 2050 | 4.00 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 99.1% |
| 2010 | TX | 2050 | 3.91 | Top 25% | Caucasian | 98.9% |
| 2010 | MA | 2040 | 3.60 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 96.8% |
| 2010 | TX | 2040 | 3.80 | Class Not Ranked | Hispanic | 98.3% |
| 2010 | NJ | 2030 | 3.73 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 97.7% |
| 2010 | OK | 2030 | 3.66 | Class Not Ranked | Native American | 97.2% |
| 2010 | FL | 2030 | 3.70 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 97.5% |
| 2010 | NH | 2030 | 3.60 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 96.6% |
| 2010 | MD | 2030 | 4.00 | Top 5% | East Asian | 99.0% |
| 2010 | NY | 2030 | 3.67 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 97.2% |
| 2010 | TX | 2020 | 3.55 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 95.6% |
| 2010 | FL | 2020 | 3.50 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 94.9% |
| 2010 | NY | 2020 | 3.70 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 97.2% |
| 2010 | PA | 2020 | 3.60 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 96.3% |
| 2010 | VA | 2020 | 3.64 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 96.7% |
| 2010 | TX | 2010 | 3.60 | Top 30% | Caucasian | 96.0% |
| 2010 | FL | 2010 | 3.63 | Top 25% | Caucasian | 96.3% |
| 2010 | FL | 2000 | 3.80 | Top 15% | Caucasian | 99.2% |
| 2010 | TN | 2000 | 3.72 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 97.2% |
| 2010 | NY | 2000 | 3.64 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 96.2% |
| 2010 | PA | 1990 | 3.90 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 99.4% |
| 2010 | FL | 1990 | 3.50 | Top 10% | East Asian | 97.9% |
| 2010 | MA | 1990 | 3.70 | Unknown | Caucasian | 96.5% |
| 2010 | CO | 1980 | 3.50 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 93.2% |
| 2010 | LA | 1970 | 3.85 | Top 10% | South Asian | 99.3% |
| 2010 | VA | 1960 | 3.65 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 94.9% |
| 2010 | GA | 1950 | 3.85 | Top 15% | Caucasian | 97.0% |
| 2010 | NJ | 1950 | 3.50 | Unknown | Caucasian | 91.5% |
| 2010 | (Private) | 1940 | 3.80 | Top 25% | Caucasian | 96.3% |
| 2010 | VA | 1930 | 3.50 | Class Not Ranked | East Asian | 90.1% |
| 2010 | OH | 1930 | 3.80 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 95.9% |
| 2010 | CA | 1930 | 3.89 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 96.9% |
| 2010 | MO | 1910 | 3.90 | Top 4% | Caucasian | 97.4% |
| 2010 | PA | 1900 | 3.67 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 92.4% |
| 2010 | CA | 1890 | 3.98 | Top 5% | South Asian | 96.8% |
| 2010 | OK | 1880 | 3.58 | Top 20% | Hispanic | 97.3% |
| 2010 | CA | 1870 | 3.85 | Top 5% | None Indicated | 94.4% |
| 2010 | CA | 1860 | 3.70 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 90.8% |
| 2010 | GA | 1850 | 4.00 | Top 3% | Caucasian | 95.9% |
| 2010 | MA | 1810 | 3.76 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 88.8% |
| 2010 | SC | 1730 | 3.70 | Top 5% | Hispanic | 77.8% |
| 2010 | FL | 1630 | 4.00 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 99.3% |
| 2010 | MO | 35 | 4.00 | Valedictorian | Caucasian | 99.9% |
| 2010 | GA | 34 | 3.70 | Top 20% | African-American | 99.6% |
| 2010 | MN | 34 | 3.48 | Top 25% | Caucasian | 99.2% |
| 2010 | IL | 34 | 3.42 | Top 25% | Hispanic | 99.1% |
| 2010 | NY | 34 | 4.00 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 99.8% |
| 2010 | IL | 33 | 3.76 | Top 3% | Hispanic | 99.4% |
| 2010 | NY | 33 | 4.00 | Valedictorian | Caucasian | 99.7% |
| 2010 | CA | 33 | 3.80 | Top 15% | Caucasian | 99.5% |
| 2010 | OK | 33 | 3.75 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 99.4% |
| 2010 | IL | 33 | 3.86 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 99.6% |
| 2010 | FL | 33 | 3.60 | Top 10% | Native American | 99.0% |
| 2010 | IL | 33 | 3.30 | Top 30% | Hispanic | 97.5% |
| 2010 | GA | 33 | 3.71 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 99.3% |
| 2010 | NY | 33 | 3.50 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 98.7% |
| 2010 | IL | 33 | 3.40 | Top 40% | Caucasian | 98.2% |
| 2010 | WA | 33 | 3.83 | Top 20% | Hispanic | 99.5% |
| 2010 | FL | 32 | 3.40 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 97.1% |
| 2010 | MA | 32 | 3.70 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 98.8% |
| 2010 | NY | 31 | 3.80 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 98.6% |
| 2010 | IL | 31 | 3.33 | Top 15% | Caucasian | 94.3% |
| 2010 | CO | 31 | 3.97 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 99.2% |
| 2010 | KS | 31 | 3.86 | Top 15% | Caucasian | 98.9% |
| 2010 | VA | 30 | 3.62 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 96.2% |
| 2010 | NY | 30 | 3.52 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 94.9% |
| 2010 | LA | 30 | 3.83 | Top 2% | African-American | 98.0% |
| 2010 | WI | 30 | 3.66 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 96.6% |
| 2010 | FL | 30 | 3.87 | Top 3% | East Asian | 98.2% |
| 2010 | CO | 30 | 4.00 | Top 4% | Caucasian | 98.8% |
| 2010 | WA | 30 | 3.86 | Top 15% | Caucasian | 98.2% |
| 2010 | OR | 30 | 3.80 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 97.8% |
| 2010 | FL | 30 | 4.00 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 98.8% |
| 2010 | TN | 29 | 3.10 | Top 30% | Caucasian | 75.5% |
| 2010 | CO | 29 | 3.77 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 96.2% |
| 2010 | NY | 29 | 3.55 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 92.7% |
| 2010 | CA | 29 | 3.50 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 91.5% |
| 2010 | CA | 25 | 3.44 | Top 15% | African-American | 59.6% |
| 2009 | XX | 2400 | 4.00 | Valedictorian | Caucasian | 99.9% |
| 2009 | TX | 2340 | 3.96 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 99.9% |
| 2009 | (Private) | 2310 | 3.99 | Top 5% | Hispanic | 99.9% |
| 2009 | GA | 2300 | 3.84 | Top 5% | East Asian | 99.8% |
| 2009 | KY | 2300 | 3.66 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 99.7% |
| 2009 | NC | 2290 | 3.90 | Top 5% | Other | 99.9% |
| 2009 | SC | 2280 | 4.00 | Top 1% | Caucasian | 99.9% |
| 2009 | MI | 2270 | 4.00 | Valedictorian | Caucasian | 99.9% |
| 2009 | VT | 2270 | 3.82 | Top 5% | Middle-Eastern | 99.7% |
| 2009 | (Private) | 2270 | 4.00 | Valedictorian | Other | 99.9% |
| 2009 | CA | 2270 | 3.40 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 99.0% |
| 2009 | IL | 2250 | 3.60 | Top 20% | Hispanic | 99.5% |
| 2009 | NY | 2250 | 3.95 | Top 5% | African-American | 99.8% |
| 2009 | CA | 2250 | 4.00 | Salutatorian | None Indicated | 99.8% |
| 2009 | CA | 2250 | 4.00 | Salutatorian | Caucasian | 99.8% |
| 2009 | (Private) | 2250 | 3.83 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 99.7% |
| 2009 | CA | 2240 | 3.97 | Top 1% | East Asian | 99.8% |
| 2009 | MD | 2230 | 3.50 | Unknown | Caucasian | 99.0% |
| 2009 | CA | 2220 | 3.76 | Unknown | Caucasian | 99.5% |
| 2009 | RI | 2220 | 3.80 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 99.6% |
| 2009 | CT | 2220 | 3.73 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 99.5% |
| 2009 | TX | 2220 | 3.77 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 99.5% |
| 2009 | MA | 2220 | 3.55 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 99.1% |
| 2009 | MD | 2210 | 3.57 | Unknown | None Indicated | 99.1% |
| 2009 | IL | 2200 | 3.97 | Top 1% | Caucasian | 99.9% |
| 2009 | AL | 2190 | 3.98 | Top 1% | Caucasian | 99.7% |
| 2009 | CA | 2190 | 3.60 | Top 10% | East Asian | 99.0% |
| 2009 | TX | 2180 | 3.62 | Unknown | South Asian | 99.0% |
| 2009 | CA | 2180 | 3.80 | Top 10% | Hispanic | 99.4% |
| 2009 | CT | 2180 | 3.97 | Top 1% | Caucasian | 99.7% |
| 2009 | (Private) | 2170 | 3.80 | Top 10% | East Asian | 99.4% |
| 2009 | CA | 2170 | 3.30 | Top 20% | Middle-Eastern | 97.1% |
| 2009 | OH | 2160 | 3.99 | Top 1% | None Indicated | 99.7% |
| 2009 | TX | 2160 | 3.92 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 99.5% |
| 2009 | CA | 2150 | 3.40 | Class Not Ranked | African-American | 97.5% |
| 2009 | NY | 2140 | 3.82 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 99.3% |
| 2009 | FL | 2140 | 3.60 | Top 30% | Caucasian | 98.5% |
| 2009 | OH | 2140 | 4.00 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 99.6% |
| 2009 | NJ | 2130 | 3.70 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 98.8% |
| 2009 | FL | 2130 | 3.73 | Unknown | Caucasian | 98.9% |
| 2009 | WI | 2130 | 3.80 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 99.2% |
| 2009 | NJ | 2130 | 3.80 | Top 5% | None Indicated | 99.2% |
| 2009 | PA | 2130 | 3.89 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 99.4% |
| 2009 | FL | 2120 | 3.65 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 98.5% |
| 2009 | CA | 2120 | 3.77 | Class Not Ranked | Other | 99.0% |
| 2009 | MD | 2120 | 3.90 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 99.3% |
| 2009 | FL | 2110 | 3.60 | Top 10% | East Asian | 98.1% |
| 2009 | NC | 2110 | 3.90 | Top 5% | None Indicated | 99.3% |
| 2009 | WI | 2100 | 3.98 | Top 1% | Caucasian | 99.8% |
| 2009 | FL | 2100 | 3.65 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 98.3% |
| 2009 | CA | 2100 | 3.80 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 98.9% |
| 2009 | UT | 2100 | 3.94 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 99.3% |
| 2009 | NJ | 2090 | 3.50 | Top 30% | Caucasian | 98.7% |
| 2009 | (Private) | 2090 | 3.30 | Class Not Ranked | East Asian | 94.7% |
| 2009 | PA | 2090 | 3.70 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 98.4% |
| 2009 | MA | 2080 | 3.70 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 99.3% |
| 2009 | NJ | 2080 | 3.17 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 91.5% |
| 2009 | NJ | 2080 | 3.20 | Top 30% | Caucasian | 92.2% |
| 2009 | (Private) | 2080 | 3.40 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 95.7% |
| 2009 | RI | 2080 | 2.76 | Unknown | Middle-Eastern | 74.8% |
| 2009 | FL | 2070 | 4.00 | Salutatorian | Caucasian | 99.7% |
| 2009 | CA | 2070 | 3.83 | Top 20% | African-American | 98.8% |
| 2009 | CT | 2070 | 3.80 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 98.6% |
| 2009 | FL | 2060 | 3.60 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 97.3% |
| 2009 | MA | 2050 | 3.20 | Class Not Ranked | East Asian | 91.7% |
| 2009 | NY | 2050 | 3.84 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 98.8% |
| 2009 | TX | 2050 | 3.39 | Top 40% | Caucasian | 94.4% |
| 2009 | KS | 2050 | 4.00 | Valedictorian | Caucasian | 99.1% |
| 2009 | PA | 2040 | 4.00 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 99.1% |
| 2009 | VA | 2040 | 3.80 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 98.3% |
| 2009 | TX | 2030 | 3.70 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 97.5% |
| 2009 | NY | 2030 | 3.70 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 97.5% |
| 2009 | FL | 2020 | 3.75 | Top 5% | Hispanic | 97.6% |
| 2009 | NY | 2010 | 3.80 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 97.8% |
| 2009 | TX | 2010 | 3.75 | Top 10% | East Asian | 97.5% |
| 2009 | MD | 2010 | 3.80 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 97.8% |
| 2009 | OH | 2010 | 3.60 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 96.0% |
| 2009 | FL | 2000 | 3.69 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 96.7% |
| 2009 | PA | 1980 | 3.65 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 95.6% |
| 2009 | MA | 1970 | 3.40 | Top 30% | Caucasian | 90.3% |
| 2009 | FL | 1960 | 4.00 | Valedictorian | East Asian | 98.2% |
| 2009 | MA | 1950 | 3.13 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 77.2% |
| 2009 | MO | 1940 | 3.75 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 95.7% |
| 2009 | FL | 1940 | 3.70 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 95.0% |
| 2009 | OH | 1940 | 3.80 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 96.3% |
| 2009 | CA | 1940 | 3.63 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 93.8% |
| 2009 | CA | 1930 | 3.53 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 98.8% |
| 2009 | NY | 1930 | 3.90 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 97.0% |
| 2009 | PA | 1930 | 3.90 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 97.0% |
| 2009 | FL | 1920 | 3.10 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 70.7% |
| 2009 | CA | 1920 | 4.00 | Valedictorian | Caucasian | 97.6% |
| 2009 | (Private) | 1920 | 3.70 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 94.1% |
| 2009 | VA | 1910 | 3.93 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 96.8% |
| 2009 | NE | 1900 | 3.30 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 93.8% |
| 2009 | CA | 1890 | 3.68 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 92.2% |
| 2009 | NY | 1880 | 3.57 | Top 30% | Hispanic | 89.3% |
| 2009 | TX | 1870 | 3.51 | Top 20% | African-American | 91.8% |
| 2009 | NY | 1870 | 3.80 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 96.5% |
| 2009 | MD | 1870 | 3.60 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 90.1% |
| 2009 | MD | 1760 | 3.50 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 80.5% |
| 2009 | FL | 1760 | 3.85 | Top 10% | Hispanic | 87.7% |
| 2009 | MS | 1580 | 3.89 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 98.3% |
| 2009 | MA | 1580 | 3.75 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 99.9% |
| 2009 | LA | 1410 | 3.85 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 99.2% |
| 2009 | FL | 35 | 3.98 | Salutatorian | Caucasian | 99.9% |
| 2009 | CO | 34 | 3.87 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 99.8% |
| 2009 | FL | 34 | 3.75 | Top 10% | None Indicated | 99.7% |
| 2009 | WI | 34 | 3.70 | Class Not Ranked | Hispanic | 99.6% |
| 2009 | NC | 34 | 4.00 | Class Not Ranked | Middle-Eastern | 99.8% |
| 2009 | PA | 34 | 3.90 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 99.8% |
| 2009 | IA | 34 | 3.95 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 99.8% |
| 2009 | LA | 34 | 4.00 | Top 1% | Caucasian | 99.8% |
| 2009 | IL | 33 | 3.95 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 99.7% |
| 2009 | IL | 32 | 3.75 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 99.0% |
| 2009 | MT | 32 | 3.98 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 99.5% |
| 2009 | NY | 32 | 4.00 | Top 1% | Caucasian | 99.5% |
| 2009 | NJ | 32 | 3.70 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 98.8% |
| 2009 | CA | 32 | 3.93 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 99.4% |
| 2009 | CA | 32 | 3.40 | Class Not Ranked | Hispanic | 97.1% |
| 2009 | NY | 32 | 3.82 | Top 20% | African-American | 99.2% |
| 2009 | IL | 32 | 3.70 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 98.8% |
| 2009 | LA | 32 | 3.50 | Top 40% | Caucasian | 97.9% |
| 2009 | OH | 31 | 3.85 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 98.8% |
| 2009 | OH | 31 | 3.85 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 98.8% |
| 2009 | IL | 31 | 3.64 | Class Not Ranked | East Asian | 97.8% |
| 2009 | MO | 31 | 4.00 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 99.3% |
| 2009 | NY | 31 | 3.80 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 98.6% |
| 2009 | IL | 31 | 3.32 | Top 40% | Caucasian | 94.1% |
| 2009 | IL | 30 | 4.00 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 98.8% |
| 2009 | TX | 30 | 3.20 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 87.2% |
| 2009 | TN | 29 | 3.80 | Unknown | African-American | 96.5% |
| 2009 | NY | 29 | 3.70 | Unknown | Caucasian | 95.3% |
| 2009 | AZ | 28 | 3.83 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 95.0% |
| 2009 | IL | 28 | 3.60 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 90.1% |
| 2009 | OH | 28 | 4.00 | Top 1% | Caucasian | 97.0% |
| 2009 | TX | 28 | 3.60 | Top 10% | South Asian | 90.1% |
| 2009 | FL | 27 | 3.35 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 72.1% |
| 2009 | FL | 24 | 3.40 | Top 30% | Caucasian | 44.6% |
| 2008 | MA | 2350 | 4.00 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 99.9% |
| 2008 | PA | 2340 | 3.70 | Top 10% | East Asian | 99.8% |
| 2008 | NY | 2340 | 4.00 | Salutatorian | Caucasian | 99.9% |
| 2008 | (Private) | 2320 | 4.00 | Top 1% | South Asian | 99.9% |
| 2008 | IL | 2270 | 3.98 | Unknown | Caucasian | 99.8% |
| 2008 | LA | 2270 | 3.90 | Salutatorian | East Asian | 99.8% |
| 2008 | NJ | 2270 | 3.50 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 99.3% |
| 2008 | LA | 2250 | 3.95 | Valedictorian | Caucasian | 99.8% |
| 2008 | TX | 2250 | 3.55 | Unknown | East Asian | 99.3% |
| 2008 | NJ | 2240 | 3.43 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 98.9% |
| 2008 | LA | 2230 | 4.00 | Valedictorian | Caucasian | 99.9% |
| 2008 | TX | 2230 | 3.70 | Unknown | East Asian | 99.5% |
| 2008 | PA | 2220 | 3.90 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 99.8% |
| 2008 | MA | 2210 | 3.56 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 99.1% |
| 2008 | NY | 2200 | 4.00 | Top 5% | South Asian | 99.7% |
| 2008 | (Private) | 2180 | 4.00 | Valedictorian | East Asian | 99.8% |
| 2008 | MO | 2180 | 3.80 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 99.5% |
| 2008 | PA | 2180 | 3.90 | Top 5% | None Indicated | 99.6% |
| 2008 | NY | 2180 | 3.72 | Top 10% | None Indicated | 99.3% |
| 2008 | CA | 2170 | 3.69 | Top 20% | East Asian | 99.1% |
| 2008 | OH | 2160 | 3.42 | Top 20% | South Asian | 97.8% |
| 2008 | NY | 2120 | 3.85 | Unknown | Caucasian | 99.3% |
| 2008 | (Private) | 2120 | 3.94 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 99.5% |
| 2008 | MD | 2110 | 3.43 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 96.9% |
| 2008 | NJ | 2090 | 3.80 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 98.8% |
| 2008 | NY | 2090 | 3.80 | Valedictorian | Caucasian | 98.8% |
| 2008 | NH | 2070 | 3.80 | Unknown | None Indicated | 98.6% |
| 2008 | NJ | 2070 | 3.70 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 98.1% |
| 2008 | FL | 2050 | 3.50 | Unknown | Caucasian | 96.0% |
| 2008 | FL | 2040 | 3.30 | Bottom 50% | Hispanic | 92.2% |
| 2008 | MD | 2040 | 3.76 | Top 10% | South Asian | 98.0% |
| 2008 | NC | 2040 | 3.50 | Unknown | Caucasian | 95.7% |
| 2008 | NJ | 2030 | 3.70 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 97.5% |
| 2008 | PA | 2020 | 3.70 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 99.3% |
| 2008 | CA | 2020 | 3.50 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 96.6% |
| 2008 | NY | 2020 | 3.70 | Top 10% | Hispanic | 97.2% |
| 2008 | OK | 2000 | 3.88 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 98.2% |
| 2008 | PA | 1980 | 3.39 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 95.2% |
| 2008 | CA | 1980 | 3.67 | Valedictorian | Caucasian | 95.9% |
| 2008 | NY | 1950 | 3.90 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 98.4% |
| 2008 | CA | 1950 | 3.25 | Top 30% | None Indicated | 83.1% |
| 2008 | VA | 1950 | 3.63 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 94.2% |
| 2008 | PA | 1950 | 3.30 | Top 30% | African-American | 85.2% |
| 2008 | NY | 1940 | 3.70 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 95.0% |
| 2008 | VA | 1930 | 3.50 | Unknown | Caucasian | 94.6% |
| 2008 | PA | 1930 | 3.80 | Unknown | Caucasian | 95.9% |
| 2008 | TX | 1920 | 4.00 | Salutatorian | Caucasian | 99.3% |
| 2008 | NM | 1920 | 3.96 | Top 10% | Hispanic | 97.3% |
| 2008 | CO | 1890 | 3.88 | Unknown | Caucasian | 97.3% |
| 2008 | IL | 1890 | 3.31 | Unknown | Hispanic | 78.6% |
| 2008 | WA | 1890 | 3.55 | Unknown | Caucasian | 88.7% |
| 2008 | CA | 1870 | 3.06 | Unknown | None Indicated | 58.6% |
| 2008 | CA | 1850 | 3.89 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 94.3% |
| 2008 | NY | 1830 | 3.70 | Unknown | Caucasian | 88.6% |
| 2008 | NY | 1830 | 3.20 | Top 20% | South Asian | 61.7% |
| 2008 | NC | 1760 | 3.49 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 69.7% |
| 2008 | MD | 1460 | 4.00 | Unknown | Caucasian | 99.7% |
| 2008 | FL | 1320 | 3.50 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 93.2% |
| 2008 | CA | 33 | 3.51 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 98.7% |
| 2008 | NY | 33 | 3.63 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 99.1% |
| 2008 | AL | 33 | 3.80 | Top 10% | Other | 99.5% |
| 2008 | LA | 32 | 3.87 | Top 5% | None Indicated | 99.3% |
| 2008 | SD | 32 | 4.00 | Valedictorian | Middle-Eastern | 99.5% |
| 2008 | GA | 32 | 3.80 | Unknown | East Asian | 99.2% |
| 2008 | MO | 31 | 3.60 | Unknown | Caucasian | 97.5% |
| 2008 | OK | 31 | 3.85 | Valedictorian | Caucasian | 98.8% |
| 2008 | OH | 30 | 4.00 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 98.8% |
| 2008 | NY | 29 | 3.70 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 95.3% |
| 2008 | XX | 29 | 3.45 | Unknown | South Asian | 90.2% |
| 2008 | OK | 28 | 3.97 | Top 1% | Caucasian | 96.7% |
| 2007 | MD | 2270 | 3.30 | Top 40% | Caucasian | 98.7% |
| 2007 | MD | 2250 | 4.00 | Unknown | Caucasian | 99.8% |
| 2007 | CA | 2160 | 3.80 | Unknown | East Asian | 99.3% |
| 2007 | IN | 1900 | 4.00 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 97.2% |
| 2007 | TX | 1870 | 3.65 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 98.6% |
| 2007 | MD | 1700 | 3.37 | Unknown | Caucasian | 49.5% |
| 2007 | TN | 34 | 4.00 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 99.8% |
| 2007 | FL | 31 | 3.75 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 98.4% |
| 2006 | MD | 2370 | 3.87 | Unknown | None Indicated | 99.9% |
| 2006 | TX | 2250 | 3.90 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 99.8% |
| 2006 | TX | 2130 | 4.00 | Class Not Ranked | Hispanic | 99.5% |
| 2006 | FL | 2040 | 3.75 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 98.0% |
| 2006 | NC | 31 | 3.71 | Unknown | Caucasian | 98.2% |
| 2005 | NY | 2250 | 3.90 | Top 5% | None Indicated | 99.8% |
| 2003 | GA | 1390 | 3.80 | Top 20% | Hispanic | 98.8% |
| 2002 | TX | 1530 | 4.00 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 99.9% |
|
|
| 2010 | NJ | 1960 | 3.48 | Top 25% | Caucasian | 91.6% |
| 2010 | TX | 1810 | 3.00 | Top 40% | Caucasian | 46.2% |
| 2010 | NY | 1770 | 3.40 | Class Not Ranked | Hispanic | 67.8% |
| 2010 | (Private) | 32 | 2.90 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 87.4% |
| 2009 | MD | 2210 | 2.98 | Class Not Ranked | East Asian | 94.5% |
| 2009 | XX | 1970 | 4.00 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 98.4% |
| 2009 | CT | 1920 | 3.60 | Top 30% | Caucasian | 92.1% |
| 2009 | NH | 1870 | 3.28 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 73.9% |
| 2009 | NC | 1860 | 2.76 | Unknown | Caucasian | 34.0% |
| 2009 | NY | 1840 | 3.50 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 81.6% |
| 2009 | NY | 1810 | 3.00 | Unknown | Hispanic | 46.2% |
| 2009 | NY | 1770 | 2.90 | Unknown | Caucasian | 28.0% |
| 2009 | CT | 1710 | 3.25 | Top 40% | Caucasian | 41.9% |
| 2009 | CA | 1680 | 2.82 | Unknown | African-American | 12.8% |
| 2009 | GA | 28 | 3.10 | Unknown | Caucasian | 65.5% |
| 2008 | FL | 2100 | 4.00 | Top 1% | None Indicated | 99.4% |
| 2008 | CA | 1680 | 3.30 | Top 10% | Middle-Eastern | 39.9% |
| 2008 | TN | 27 | 3.30 | Top 20% | African-American | 68.8% |
| 2008 | CA | 25 | 3.70 | Top 10% | South Asian | 77.0% |
| |