Texas A&M University - College Station Applications and Decisions
Below is a list of applicants who have demonstrated interest in Texas A&M University - College Station. Our best formula
for this college is based on
64 members who were accepted or rejected. The formula
has a college admissions prediction accuracy of
95%?.
Because not all members have filled out the most recent version of our survey, some predictions are made based on
less-accurate models. Those are noted with an asterisk (*) next to their prediction.
This is a very popular school, and you're looking at the whole list. If you
would like to only see completed applications,
click here for a smaller version of this page.
|
| 2010 | GA | 1980 | 3.30 | Top 40% | Caucasian | 100.0% |
| 2010 | TX | 1920 | 3.60 | Top 25% | Caucasian | 99.9% |
| 2010 | TX | 1750 | 3.35 | Top 25% | Caucasian | 88.2% |
| 2010 | TX | 28 | 3.15 | Top 25% | Caucasian | 97.3% |
| 2009 | NJ | 1900 | 3.40 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 97.9% |
| 2009 | TX | 27 | 3.55 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 88.2% |
| 2008 | TX | 2120 | 3.94 | Top 10% | South Asian | 100.0% |
|
| 2010 | XX | 2400 | 4.00 | Valedictorian | South Asian | 100.0% |
| 2010 | TX | 2320 | 3.53 | Top 15% | East Asian | 100.0% |
| 2010 | TX | 2300 | 3.90 | Top 2% | Caucasian | 100.0% |
| 2010 | TX | 2210 | 3.87 | Unknown | Hispanic | 100.0% |
| 2010 | TX | 2190 | 3.23 | Top 35% | South Asian | 100.0% |
| 2010 | TX | 2180 | 3.10 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 100.0% |
| 2010 | TX | 2140 | 3.90 | Top 2% | Caucasian | 100.0% |
| 2010 | NJ | 2140 | 3.30 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 100.0% |
| 2010 | TX | 2130 | 3.75 | Top 15% | Hispanic | 100.0% |
| 2010 | XX | 2130 | 3.75 | Class Not Ranked | East Asian | 100.0% |
| 2010 | (Private) | 2120 | 4.00 | Top 2% | Caucasian | 100.0% |
| 2010 | TX | 2120 | 3.50 | Top 25% | South Asian | 100.0% |
| 2010 | TX | 2100 | 3.67 | Top 15% | South Asian | 100.0% |
| 2010 | TX | 2100 | 3.50 | Top 20% | South Asian | 100.0% |
| 2010 | TX | 2090 | 3.93 | Top 15% | South Asian | 100.0% |
| 2010 | CA | 2080 | 3.69 | Top 10% | None Indicated | 100.0% |
| 2010 | TX | 2070 | 3.60 | Top 25% | Caucasian | 100.0% |
| 2010 | NH | 2070 | 3.73 | Top 10% | South Asian | 100.0% |
| 2010 | TX | 2070 | 3.91 | Top 15% | Hispanic | 100.0% |
| 2010 | ME | 2060 | 3.17 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 100.0% |
| 2010 | TX | 2050 | 3.91 | Top 25% | Caucasian | 100.0% |
| 2010 | TX | 2020 | 3.55 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 99.9% |
| 2010 | TX | 2000 | 3.84 | Top 2% | Caucasian | 99.8% |
| 2010 | TX | 1920 | 3.40 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 99.4% |
| 2010 | TX | 1910 | 3.90 | Top 4% | Caucasian | 99.9% |
| 2010 | TX | 1900 | 3.69 | Top 15% | East Asian | 97.9% |
| 2010 | VA | 1870 | 3.50 | Top 25% | Caucasian | 95.4% |
| 2010 | TX | 1850 | 3.20 | Top 15% | Middle-Eastern | 97.3% |
| 2010 | TX | 1850 | 3.89 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 92.8% |
| 2010 | TX | 1840 | 3.72 | Top 3% | Hispanic | 90.5% |
| 2010 | TX | 1840 | 3.82 | Top 2% | Caucasian | 90.5% |
| 2010 | FL | 1810 | 3.45 | Top 15% | South Asian | 97.3% |
| 2010 | FL | 1810 | 3.65 | Top 25% | African-American | 88.2% |
| 2010 | TX | 1810 | 4.00 | Top 2% | Hispanic | 81.2% |
| 2010 | TX | 1730 | 3.58 | Top 15% | East Asian | 35.8% |
| 2010 | TX | 1700 | 3.83 | Top 10% | Hispanic | 32.3% |
| 2010 | FL | 1640 | 3.20 | Top 30% | Caucasian | 69.7% |
| 2010 | TX | 1620 | 3.77 | Top 15% | Hispanic | 3.0% |
| 2010 | TX | 1600 | 4.00 | Valedictorian | Hispanic | 2.0% |
| 2010 | NY | 34 | 3.90 | Top 4% | Caucasian | 100.0% |
| 2010 | TX | 34 | 3.60 | Top 15% | Caucasian | 100.0% |
| 2010 | TX | 33 | 3.80 | Top 30% | East Asian | 100.0% |
| 2010 | TX | 32 | 3.80 | Class Not Ranked | East Asian | 100.0% |
| 2010 | TX | 30 | 4.00 | Top 25% | Caucasian | 99.9% |
| 2010 | TX | 28 | 3.50 | Top 40% | Native American | 97.3% |
| 2009 | (Private) | 2310 | 3.99 | Top 5% | Hispanic | 100.0% |
| 2009 | TX | 2280 | 4.00 | Salutatorian | Caucasian | 100.0% |
| 2009 | TX | 2200 | 3.83 | Top 30% | Caucasian | 100.0% |
| 2009 | TX | 2180 | 3.62 | Unknown | South Asian | 100.0% |
| 2009 | TX | 2150 | 3.67 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 100.0% |
| 2009 | TX | 2140 | 3.50 | Top 40% | Caucasian | 100.0% |
| 2009 | TX | 2130 | 3.38 | Top 5% | East Asian | 100.0% |
| 2009 | TX | 2130 | 4.00 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 100.0% |
| 2009 | TX | 2120 | 3.30 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 100.0% |
| 2009 | FL | 2070 | 3.86 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 100.0% |
| 2009 | TX | 2040 | 3.70 | Top 10% | East Asian | 100.0% |
| 2009 | TX | 2030 | 3.80 | Top 20% | South Asian | 99.9% |
| 2009 | TX | 2030 | 3.59 | Top 10% | East Asian | 99.9% |
| 2009 | TX | 2030 | 3.97 | Top 20% | South Asian | 99.9% |
| 2009 | NC | 2020 | 3.86 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 99.9% |
| 2009 | TX | 2010 | 3.91 | Top 20% | South Asian | 99.9% |
| 2009 | TX | 2000 | 3.94 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 99.8% |
| 2009 | TX | 1990 | 3.77 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 100.0% |
| 2009 | TX | 1990 | 3.84 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 99.8% |
| 2009 | TX | 1980 | 4.00 | Salutatorian | Caucasian | 99.7% |
| 2009 | TX | 1980 | 3.82 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 99.7% |
| 2009 | TX | 1960 | 3.66 | Top 20% | South Asian | 99.5% |
| 2009 | TX | 1950 | 3.98 | Top 20% | East Asian | 99.4% |
| 2009 | TX | 1910 | 3.20 | Top 40% | Hispanic | 100.0% |
| 2009 | TX | 1910 | 4.00 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 98.4% |
| 2009 | TX | 1900 | 3.50 | Top 20% | East Asian | 97.9% |
| 2009 | TX | 1900 | 3.50 | Top 40% | Hispanic | 97.9% |
| 2009 | PA | 1850 | 2.90 | Unknown | South Asian | 92.8% |
| 2009 | TX | 1820 | 4.00 | Top 1% | Hispanic | 85.5% |
| 2009 | TX | 1760 | 3.48 | Top 30% | Caucasian | 97.3% |
| 2009 | TX | 1720 | 3.60 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 99.9% |
| 2009 | (Private) | 610 | 3.51 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 100.0% |
| 2009 | (Private) | 32 | 3.57 | Class Not Ranked | East Asian | 100.0% |
| 2009 | (Private) | 31 | 3.80 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 100.0% |
| 2008 | TX | 2330 | 4.00 | Valedictorian | Caucasian | 100.0% |
| 2008 | TX | 2330 | 4.00 | Valedictorian | Caucasian | 100.0% |
| 2008 | TX | 2320 | 3.75 | Top 1% | Caucasian | 100.0% |
| 2008 | (Private) | 2320 | 4.00 | Top 1% | South Asian | 100.0% |
| 2008 | TX | 2260 | 4.00 | Top 20% | None Indicated | 100.0% |
| 2008 | TX | 2250 | 3.55 | Unknown | East Asian | 100.0% |
| 2008 | TX | 2230 | 3.95 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 100.0% |
| 2008 | TX | 2190 | 4.00 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 100.0% |
| 2008 | TX | 2190 | 3.90 | Top 10% | None Indicated | 100.0% |
| 2008 | TX | 2170 | 4.00 | Valedictorian | Caucasian | 100.0% |
| 2008 | TX | 2090 | 3.55 | Top 40% | Caucasian | 100.0% |
| 2008 | CA | 2030 | 3.36 | Top 20% | East Asian | 99.9% |
| 2008 | MD | 1930 | 3.70 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 99.0% |
| 2008 | TX | 1880 | 3.55 | Top 40% | Caucasian | 96.6% |
| 2008 | TX | 1840 | 3.50 | Top 30% | Caucasian | 90.5% |
| 2008 | NY | 1830 | 3.20 | Class Not Ranked | Hispanic | 88.2% |
| 2008 | TX | 1720 | 3.80 | Top 5% | Hispanic | 29.0% |
| 2008 | TX | 28 | 3.80 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 97.3% |
| 2007 | TX | 2020 | 3.70 | Top 10% | Hispanic | 100.0% |
| 2007 | TX | 1990 | 4.00 | Top 10% | Middle-Eastern | 99.8% |
| 2002 | TX | 1530 | 4.00 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 100.0% |
|
| 2010 | TX | 1900 | 3.55 | Bottom 50% | East Asian | 97.9% |
| 2010 | TX | 1780 | 3.50 | Top 20% | Hispanic | 69.7% |
| 2009 | WA | 1910 | 3.48 | Top 30% | East Asian | 98.4% |
|
|
| 2010 | TX | 1820 | 3.50 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 85.5% |
| 2010 | TX | 29 | 3.40 | Bottom 50% | East Asian | 99.4% |
| 2009 | TX | 1650 | 3.14 | Top 40% | African-American | 6.3% |
| 2009 | TX | 1580 | 3.20 | Bottom 50% | Caucasian | 1.1% |
| 2008 | (Private) | 1760 | 3.84 | Top 20% | East Asian | 55.1% |
|
| 2010 | CA | 2040 | 3.54 | Unknown | East Asian | 99.9% |
| 2010 | TX | 2040 | 3.55 | Top 15% | South Asian | 99.9% |
| 2010 | TX | 2040 | 3.80 | Class Not Ranked | Hispanic | 99.9% |
| 2010 | TX | 2040 | 2.96 | Top 40% | East Asian | 99.9% |
| 2010 | TX | 2020 | 3.60 | Top 35% | Caucasian | 100.0% |
| 2010 | XX | 1970 | 4.00 | Class Not Ranked | East Asian | 99.7% |
| 2010 | XX | 1940 | 3.25 | Top 15% | East Asian | 99.3% |
| 2010 | TX | 1930 | 3.69 | Top 25% | Caucasian | 99.0% |
| 2010 | CA | 1930 | 3.60 | Top 15% | Hispanic | 99.0% |
| 2010 | TX | 1930 | 3.70 | Top 15% | South Asian | 99.0% |
| 2010 | WA | 1910 | 3.67 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 98.4% |
| 2010 | TX | 1880 | 3.30 | Top 15% | Hispanic | 99.4% |
| 2010 | TX | 1880 | 3.30 | Bottom 50% | Caucasian | 96.6% |
| 2010 | TX | 1840 | 3.60 | Top 25% | African-American | 97.3% |
| 2010 | TX | 1840 | 3.00 | Bottom 40% | Caucasian | 90.5% |
| 2010 | XX | 1840 | 4.00 | Top 2% | South Asian | 90.5% |
| 2010 | TX | 1800 | 3.26 | Bottom 40% | Caucasian | 100.0% |
| 2010 | TX | 1800 | 3.44 | Bottom 40% | Caucasian | 97.3% |
| 2010 | FL | 1800 | 3.79 | Top 15% | Caucasian | 77.3% |
| 2010 | TX | 1790 | 3.20 | Top 35% | Caucasian | 72.9% |
| 2010 | TX | 1780 | 3.38 | Bottom 40% | Caucasian | 66.3% |
| 2010 | XX | 1770 | 3.81 | Unknown | East Asian | 60.8% |
| 2010 | XX | 1760 | 3.60 | Top 10% | South Asian | 55.1% |
| 2010 | TX | 1750 | 3.72 | Top 25% | Hispanic | 88.2% |
| 2010 | TX | 1750 | 3.70 | Top 40% | Hispanic | 69.7% |
| 2010 | TX | 1750 | 3.40 | Top 25% | Caucasian | 47.2% |
| 2010 | TX | 1710 | 3.60 | Top 15% | Hispanic | 24.3% |
| 2010 | TX | 1710 | 3.42 | Top 25% | Middle-Eastern | 24.3% |
| 2010 | TX | 1700 | 3.50 | Top 30% | Caucasian | 69.7% |
| 2010 | TX | 1700 | 3.87 | Top 25% | Caucasian | 20.3% |
| 2010 | TX | 1690 | 3.07 | Top 35% | East Asian | 69.7% |
| 2010 | TX | 1690 | 3.88 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 32.3% |
| 2010 | TX | 1690 | 3.50 | Top 15% | South Asian | 15.7% |
| 2010 | CA | 1680 | 3.20 | Class Not Ranked | South Asian | 12.8% |
| 2010 | TX | 1680 | 3.20 | Top 40% | Caucasian | 12.8% |
| 2010 | (Private) | 1660 | 3.40 | Top 35% | Hispanic | 97.3% |
| 2010 | TX | 1660 | 3.70 | Top 30% | Other | 7.8% |
| 2010 | TX | 1650 | 3.64 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 6.3% |
| 2010 | TX | 1640 | 3.92 | Class Not Ranked | Other | 9.0% |
| 2010 | TX | 1630 | 3.20 | Top 15% | African-American | 9.0% |
| 2010 | TX | 1590 | 3.30 | Bottom 50% | Hispanic | 1.4% |
| 2010 | TX | 1580 | 3.50 | Top 25% | Caucasian | 2.0% |
| 2010 | TX | 1490 | 2.70 | Top 25% | Hispanic | 0.1% |
| 2010 | TX | 1470 | 4.00 | Top 25% | Hispanic | 0.1% |
| 2010 | TX | 1310 | 3.10 | Top 30% | Middle-Eastern | 0.0% |
| 2010 | TX | 32 | 3.60 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 100.0% |
| 2010 | TX | 28 | 3.65 | Top 30% | Caucasian | 97.3% |
| 2010 | MI | 28 | 3.50 | Top 30% | Caucasian | 97.3% |
| 2010 | IL | 28 | 3.69 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 97.3% |
| 2010 | TX | 27 | 3.79 | Top 30% | Caucasian | 88.2% |
| 2010 | TX | 27 | 3.79 | Top 15% | South Asian | 88.2% |
| 2010 | TX | 25 | 3.50 | Top 35% | Hispanic | 32.3% |
| 2010 | (Private) | 25 | 3.64 | Top 30% | South Asian | 32.3% |
| 2009 | TX | 2400 | 4.00 | Valedictorian | Caucasian | 100.0% |
| 2009 | XX | 2100 | 3.75 | Top 40% | South Asian | 100.0% |
| 2009 | WI | 2060 | 3.98 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 100.0% |
| 2009 | TX | 2020 | 3.44 | Top 30% | Caucasian | 100.0% |
| 2009 | TX | 2020 | 3.60 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 99.9% |
| 2009 | TX | 2010 | 3.20 | Top 30% | Caucasian | 99.9% |
| 2009 | XX | 1990 | 3.89 | Top 10% | East Asian | 99.8% |
| 2009 | TX | 1980 | 3.51 | Top 30% | East Asian | 99.7% |
| 2009 | TX | 1960 | 3.50 | Top 20% | East Asian | 99.5% |
| 2009 | XX | 1960 | 4.00 | Top 20% | East Asian | 99.5% |
| 2009 | TX | 1930 | 3.43 | Top 20% | East Asian | 99.0% |
| 2009 | TX | 1930 | 2.67 | Bottom 40% | Caucasian | 99.0% |
| 2009 | TX | 1920 | 3.40 | Top 20% | Other | 98.8% |
| 2009 | TX | 1920 | 3.88 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 98.8% |
| 2009 | TX | 1880 | 4.00 | Top 10% | South Asian | 96.6% |
| 2009 | MN | 1860 | 3.70 | Top 10% | East Asian | 94.3% |
| 2009 | TX | 1840 | 3.90 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 90.5% |
| 2009 | TX | 1820 | 3.20 | Top 30% | Caucasian | 97.3% |
| 2009 | TX | 1820 | 3.28 | Top 30% | Caucasian | 85.5% |
| 2009 | XX | 1740 | 3.41 | Class Not Ranked | Middle-Eastern | 41.4% |
| 2009 | TX | 1660 | 3.56 | Top 10% | Hispanic | 32.3% |
| 2009 | TX | 1640 | 3.25 | Top 20% | Hispanic | 5.0% |
| 2009 | TX | 1640 | 3.03 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 5.0% |
| 2009 | VA | 1630 | 3.60 | Top 20% | South Asian | 3.7% |
| 2009 | TX | 1620 | 3.64 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 3.0% |
| 2009 | XX | 1620 | 3.85 | Top 20% | East Asian | 3.0% |
| 2009 | TX | 1620 | 3.25 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 3.0% |
| 2009 | TX | 1600 | 2.85 | Top 30% | Hispanic | 9.0% |
| 2009 | XX | 1580 | 3.50 | Top 10% | East Asian | 1.1% |
| 2009 | TX | 1520 | 3.33 | Top 10% | East Asian | 0.2% |
| 2009 | TX | 1520 | 3.58 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 0.2% |
| 2009 | TX | 1510 | 4.00 | Top 20% | Hispanic | 0.2% |
| 2009 | TX | 1490 | 3.50 | Top 20% | Hispanic | 0.1% |
| 2009 | TX | 1400 | 3.40 | Top 30% | Hispanic | 0.0% |
| 2009 | TX | 30 | 3.40 | Top 30% | African-American | 99.9% |
| 2009 | TX | 28 | 3.46 | Top 40% | Caucasian | 97.3% |
| 2009 | TX | 26 | 3.80 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 69.7% |
| 2009 | TX | 25 | 3.70 | Top 30% | Caucasian | 32.3% |
| 2009 | MN | 22 | 3.20 | Bottom 50% | Caucasian | 0.4% |
| 2008 | TX | 2200 | 3.88 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 100.0% |
| 2008 | TX | 1640 | 3.00 | Top 30% | Middle-Eastern | 5.0% |
| 2008 | TX | 1520 | 3.00 | Top 40% | Hispanic | 0.2% |
| 2008 | TX | 28 | 4.00 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 97.3% |
| 2008 | TX | 27 | 3.59 | Top 40% | Caucasian | 88.2% |
| 2008 | XX | 26 | 2.90 | Bottom 40% | Caucasian | 69.7% |
| 2008 | TX | 26 | 3.77 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 69.7% |
| 2008 | TX | 25 | 3.10 | Top 30% | Caucasian | 32.3% |
| 2008 | TX | 24 | 3.29 | Top 20% | South Asian | 9.0% |
| 2008 | VA | 16 | 2.90 | Unknown | Caucasian | 0.0% |
| 2007 | TX | 2020 | 3.80 | Unknown | East Asian | 100.0% |
| 2007 | TX | 1910 | 3.36 | Top 30% | South Asian | 98.4% |
|
| 2012 | TX | 2400 | 4.00 | Valedictorian | African-American | 100.0% |
| 2012 | CA | 2140 | 3.78 | Top 1% | South Asian | 100.0% |
| 2012 | MD | 1990 | 2.40 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 99.8% |
| 2012 | MD | 1990 | 3.00 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 99.8% |
| 2012 | TX | 1950 | 4.00 | Top 5% | Other | 99.4% |
| 2012 | (Private) | 1930 | 3.60 | Top 15% | East Asian | 99.0% |
| 2012 | CO | 32 | 2.80 | Bottom 50% | Hispanic | 100.0% |
| 2012 | TX | 26 | 3.30 | Top 30% | None Indicated | 69.7% |
| 2012 | IL | 25 | 2.39 | Bottom 10% | Caucasian | 32.3% |
| 2012 | TX | 20 | 3.20 | Unknown | Caucasian | 0.0% |
| 2011 | CA | 2400 | 4.00 | Top 1% | East Asian | 100.0% |
| 2011 | TX | 2300 | 3.66 | Top 15% | South Asian | 100.0% |
| 2011 | TX | 2280 | 3.63 | Top 15% | South Asian | 100.0% |
| 2011 | TX | 2240 | 4.00 | Valedictorian | Caucasian | 100.0% |
| 2011 | TX | 2190 | 4.00 | Top 1% | Caucasian | 100.0% |
| 2011 | TX | 2160 | 3.92 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 100.0% |
| 2011 | TX | 2160 | 2.90 | Bottom 40% | Caucasian | 100.0% |
| 2011 | MA | 2140 | 3.20 | Unknown | Caucasian | 100.0% |
| 2011 | TX | 2120 | 3.00 | Top 25% | Caucasian | 100.0% |
| 2011 | TX | 2100 | 3.20 | Unknown | Caucasian | 100.0% |
| 2011 | TX | 2100 | 3.50 | Top 20% | Hispanic | 100.0% |
| 2011 | (Private) | 2070 | 3.55 | Top 15% | East Asian | 100.0% |
| 2011 | TX | 2050 | 4.00 | Top 1% | Caucasian | 100.0% |
| 2011 | NJ | 2040 | 3.56 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 99.9% |
| 2011 | TX | 2030 | 3.85 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 100.0% |
| 2011 | FL | 2020 | 3.80 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 100.0% |
| 2011 | MN | 2010 | 3.00 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 99.9% |
| 2011 | CA | 1950 | 3.30 | Class Not Ranked | South Asian | 99.4% |
| 2011 | TX | 1900 | 3.87 | Top 25% | Caucasian | 97.9% |
| 2011 | TX | 1900 | 3.34 | Top 40% | South Asian | 97.9% |
| 2011 | TX | 1870 | 3.00 | Class Not Ranked | South Asian | 95.4% |
| 2011 | (Private) | 1860 | 3.40 | Top 15% | East Asian | 94.3% |
| 2011 | TX | 1850 | 3.60 | Top 35% | Caucasian | 92.8% |
| 2011 | TX | 1790 | 3.10 | Top 20% | African-American | 99.9% |
| 2011 | CA | 1790 | 3.79 | Top 10% | Hispanic | 72.9% |
| 2011 | VA | 1780 | 2.80 | Bottom 50% | Hispanic | 66.3% |
| 2011 | TX | 1760 | 3.30 | Top 30% | Caucasian | 55.1% |
| 2011 | NJ | 1740 | 3.20 | Top 35% | Caucasian | 41.4% |
| 2011 | NJ | 1730 | 3.50 | Unknown | Caucasian | 35.8% |
| 2011 | FL | 1670 | 3.67 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 99.9% |
| 2011 | TX | 1640 | 3.68 | Top 30% | Caucasian | 5.0% |
| 2011 | TX | 1620 | 3.70 | Top 25% | Caucasian | 32.3% |
| 2011 | TX | 1620 | 3.68 | Top 25% | Caucasian | 32.3% |
| 2011 | TX | 1610 | 4.00 | Top 25% | Caucasian | 32.3% |
| 2011 | PA | 1280 | 3.72 | Class Not Ranked | Hispanic | 0.0% |
| 2011 | TX | 30 | 4.00 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 99.9% |
| 2011 | MI | 30 | 3.74 | Top 15% | Caucasian | 99.9% |
| 2011 | TX | 28 | 3.70 | Class Not Ranked | None Indicated | 97.3% |
| 2011 | TX | 27 | 3.50 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 88.2% |
| 2011 | TX | 27 | 3.90 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 88.2% |
| 2011 | TX | 24 | 2.70 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 9.0% |
| 2010 | CA | 2330 | 3.65 | Unknown | East Asian | 100.0% |
| 2010 | TX | 2320 | 4.00 | Class Not Ranked | None Indicated | 100.0% |
| 2010 | XX | 2310 | 3.95 | Top 4% | Caucasian | 100.0% |
| 2010 | TX | 2280 | 3.02 | Top 25% | Caucasian | 100.0% |
| 2010 | TX | 2270 | 4.00 | Top 5% | South Asian | 100.0% |
| 2010 | CA | 2250 | 4.00 | Top 20% | East Asian | 100.0% |
| 2010 | TX | 2240 | 3.73 | Top 10% | None Indicated | 100.0% |
| 2010 | TX | 2200 | 4.00 | Valedictorian | Caucasian | 100.0% |
| 2010 | TX | 2200 | 4.00 | Valedictorian | Hispanic | 100.0% |
| 2010 | WA | 2190 | 3.94 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 100.0% |
| 2010 | (Private) | 2170 | 3.75 | Class Not Ranked | South Asian | 100.0% |
| 2010 | TX | 2170 | 3.36 | Top 30% | Caucasian | 100.0% |
| 2010 | TX | 2170 | 3.57 | Class Not Ranked | South Asian | 100.0% |
| 2010 | TX | 2160 | 3.40 | Top 20% | South Asian | 100.0% |
| 2010 | XX | 2150 | 3.70 | Top 10% | South Asian | 100.0% |
| 2010 | TX | 2150 | 3.60 | Top 10% | South Asian | 100.0% |
| 2010 | TX | 2120 | 4.00 | Top 10% | Hispanic | 100.0% |
| 2010 | TX | 2110 | 3.89 | Top 15% | South Asian | 100.0% |
| 2010 | RI | 2110 | 3.50 | Unknown | Caucasian | 100.0% |
| 2010 | FL | 2090 | 3.63 | Class Not Ranked | East Asian | 100.0% |
| 2010 | TX | 2080 | 3.90 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 100.0% |
| 2010 | TX | 2070 | 4.00 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 100.0% |
| 2010 | TX | 2070 | 3.80 | Top 15% | Caucasian | 100.0% |
| 2010 | GA | 2060 | 3.80 | Top 15% | Caucasian | 100.0% |
| 2010 | TX | 2060 | 4.00 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 100.0% |
| 2010 | LA | 2060 | 3.75 | Top 30% | Caucasian | 100.0% |
| 2010 | TX | 2060 | 3.20 | Bottom 50% | Caucasian | 100.0% |
| 2010 | (Private) | 2050 | 4.00 | Valedictorian | Caucasian | 100.0% |
| 2010 | XX | 2030 | 3.93 | Class Not Ranked | East Asian | 99.9% |
| 2010 | TX | 2020 | 3.11 | Top 40% | South Asian | 99.9% |
| 2010 | CA | 2020 | 3.64 | Class Not Ranked | Hispanic | 99.9% |
| 2010 | NH | 2010 | 3.40 | Top 10% | South Asian | 99.9% |
| 2010 | CA | 2010 | 3.90 | Top 4% | Caucasian | 99.9% |
| 2010 | TX | 2000 | 3.85 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 100.0% |
| 2010 | FL | 2000 | 3.80 | Top 40% | South Asian | 99.8% |
| 2010 | TX | 1990 | 3.87 | Top 5% | African-American | 99.9% |
| 2010 | TX | 1980 | 4.00 | Valedictorian | Caucasian | 100.0% |
| 2010 | TX | 1970 | 3.30 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 100.0% |
| 2010 | FL | 1970 | 3.75 | Class Not Ranked | Hispanic | 99.7% |
| 2010 | NJ | 1970 | 3.58 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 99.7% |
| 2010 | (Private) | 1950 | 3.80 | Top 5% | Other | 99.4% |
| 2010 | TX | 1940 | 3.50 | Top 25% | Hispanic | 100.0% |
| 2010 | TX | 1940 | 3.30 | Top 35% | East Asian | 99.9% |
| 2010 | TX | 1940 | 3.56 | Top 40% | Caucasian | 99.9% |
| 2010 | (Private) | 1940 | 3.50 | Top 15% | South Asian | 99.3% |
| 2010 | CA | 1940 | 3.10 | Unknown | Middle-Eastern | 99.3% |
| 2010 | TX | 1920 | 3.80 | Top 1% | Middle-Eastern | 99.4% |
| 2010 | TX | 1920 | 3.70 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 98.8% |
| 2010 | TX | 1920 | 3.31 | Top 10% | South Asian | 98.8% |
| 2010 | PA | 1920 | 3.50 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 98.8% |
| 2010 | TX | 1910 | 3.20 | Class Not Ranked | South Asian | 100.0% |
| 2010 | XX | 1910 | 3.32 | Bottom 50% | Caucasian | 98.4% |
| 2010 | TX | 1900 | 3.92 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 97.9% |
| 2010 | TX | 1890 | 3.32 | Top 35% | African-American | 100.0% |
| 2010 | TX | 1890 | 3.50 | Top 15% | Middle-Eastern | 97.3% |
| 2010 | TX | 1890 | 3.16 | Top 35% | Caucasian | 97.3% |
| 2010 | TX | 1880 | 3.45 | Top 35% | Caucasian | 96.6% |
| 2010 | SC | 1870 | 3.57 | Top 5% | Hispanic | 100.0% |
| 2010 | IL | 1870 | 3.45 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 99.4% |
| 2010 | XX | 1870 | 3.50 | Top 5% | South Asian | 95.4% |
| 2010 | XX | 1870 | 3.80 | Top 20% | East Asian | 95.4% |
| 2010 | TX | 1860 | 3.30 | Bottom 50% | Caucasian | 94.3% |
| 2010 | TX | 1850 | 3.55 | Top 15% | Caucasian | 92.8% |
| 2010 | TX | 1840 | 3.80 | Top 3% | African-American | 90.5% |
| 2010 | TX | 1830 | 3.50 | Top 35% | East Asian | 99.9% |
| 2010 | TX | 1830 | 3.30 | Top 30% | South Asian | 88.2% |
| 2010 | TX | 1820 | 3.67 | Top 25% | Caucasian | 85.5% |
| 2010 | TX | 1820 | 3.55 | Top 35% | Caucasian | 85.5% |
| 2010 | TX | 1820 | 3.60 | Top 30% | Caucasian | 85.5% |
| 2010 | MD | 1800 | 3.30 | Top 35% | Hispanic | 77.3% |
| 2010 | TX | 1800 | 3.63 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 77.3% |
| 2010 | VA | 1800 | 3.76 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 77.3% |
| 2010 | TX | 1790 | 3.70 | Top 40% | Caucasian | 99.9% |
| 2010 | TX | 1790 | 3.24 | Top 20% | South Asian | 72.9% |
| 2010 | FL | 1780 | 3.88 | Top 10% | Hispanic | 66.3% |
| 2010 | TX | 1770 | 3.00 | Top 25% | African-American | 60.8% |
| 2010 | TX | 1770 | 3.20 | Unknown | Caucasian | 60.8% |
| 2010 | TX | 1750 | 3.50 | Top 40% | Caucasian | 47.2% |
| 2010 | WA | 1750 | 3.71 | Top 25% | South Asian | 47.2% |
| 2010 | XX | 1750 | 3.60 | Top 30% | East Asian | 47.2% |
| 2010 | VA | 1750 | 3.86 | Unknown | Caucasian | 47.2% |
| 2010 | AZ | 1740 | 2.13 | Top 40% | Caucasian | 88.2% |
| 2010 | TX | 1740 | 3.19 | Top 15% | Hispanic | 41.4% |
| 2010 | XX | 1730 | 4.00 | Top 10% | East Asian | 35.8% |
| 2010 | TX | 1730 | 3.16 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 35.8% |
| 2010 | TX | 1720 | 3.56 | Bottom 50% | Caucasian | 88.2% |
| 2010 | TX | 1720 | 3.10 | Bottom 40% | African-American | 29.0% |
| 2010 | XX | 1710 | 2.80 | Class Not Ranked | South Asian | 24.3% |
| 2010 | TX | 1700 | 3.65 | Top 40% | Hispanic | 100.0% |
| 2010 | HI | 1690 | 3.90 | Class Not Ranked | East Asian | 15.7% |
| 2010 | FL | 1680 | 3.38 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 12.8% |
| 2010 | TX | 1660 | 3.84 | Top 30% | Caucasian | 32.3% |
| 2010 | TX | 1660 | 3.40 | Bottom 50% | Caucasian | 32.3% |
| 2010 | TX | 1660 | 3.60 | Top 15% | Caucasian | 7.8% |
| 2010 | TX | 1640 | 2.20 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 5.0% |
| 2010 | TX | 1640 | 3.40 | Top 25% | Caucasian | 5.0% |
| 2010 | TX | 1620 | 3.75 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 3.0% |
| 2010 | TX | 1560 | 3.89 | Top 10% | Hispanic | 0.6% |
| 2010 | CA | 1560 | 3.33 | Top 30% | Caucasian | 0.6% |
| 2010 | TX | 1540 | 3.87 | Top 25% | Other | 0.4% |
| 2010 | TX | 1510 | 4.00 | Top 20% | Other | 2.0% |
| 2010 | TX | 1490 | 3.72 | Top 40% | Caucasian | 0.4% |
| 2010 | MA | 1480 | 3.24 | Top 30% | Caucasian | 0.1% |
| 2010 | TX | 1450 | 3.01 | Bottom 20% | Caucasian | 0.1% |
| 2010 | TX | 1440 | 3.85 | Top 10% | Hispanic | 0.0% |
| 2010 | XX | 1370 | 3.47 | Top 25% | Hispanic | 0.0% |
| 2010 | CA | 36 | 2.30 | Unknown | African-American | 100.0% |
| 2010 | MI | 34 | 3.00 | Bottom 40% | Caucasian | 100.0% |
| 2010 | TX | 32 | 3.70 | Top 3% | None Indicated | 100.0% |
| 2010 | WI | 32 | 4.00 | Valedictorian | Caucasian | 100.0% |
| 2010 | XX | 31 | 3.39 | Top 25% | South Asian | 100.0% |
| 2010 | TX | 31 | 3.60 | Top 25% | Caucasian | 100.0% |
| 2010 | TX | 31 | 3.82 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 100.0% |
| 2010 | TX | 30 | 3.30 | Top 40% | Caucasian | 99.9% |
| 2010 | MO | 30 | 3.83 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 99.9% |
| 2010 | TN | 29 | 3.72 | Top 25% | Caucasian | 99.4% |
| 2010 | TX | 28 | 3.50 | Top 35% | Caucasian | 97.3% |
| 2010 | CT | 28 | 3.00 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 97.3% |
| 2010 | IL | 28 | 3.92 | Top 15% | Caucasian | 97.3% |
| 2010 | TX | 27 | 3.67 | Top 30% | Caucasian | 88.2% |
| 2010 | CA | 27 | 3.60 | Unknown | None Indicated | 88.2% |
| 2010 | TX | 27 | 3.63 | Top 30% | Caucasian | 88.2% |
| 2010 | MI | 26 | 3.65 | Top 10% | None Indicated | 69.7% |
| 2010 | MI | 26 | 3.30 | Top 35% | Caucasian | 69.7% |
| 2010 | IL | 26 | 3.70 | Top 5% | Hispanic | 69.7% |
| 2010 | IL | 26 | 3.50 | Bottom 50% | Caucasian | 69.7% |
| 2010 | TX | 26 | 3.63 | Top 30% | Caucasian | 69.7% |
| 2010 | TX | 26 | 3.63 | Top 30% | Caucasian | 69.7% |
| 2010 | TX | 25 | 3.81 | Top 15% | African-American | 32.3% |
| 2010 | TN | 25 | 2.30 | Bottom 40% | Caucasian | 32.3% |
| 2010 | LA | 24 | 3.33 | Bottom 50% | Caucasian | 9.0% |
| 2010 | OR | 24 | 3.60 | Unknown | Caucasian | 9.0% |
| 2010 | MN | 23 | 2.81 | Unknown | South Asian | 2.0% |
| 2010 | TX | 23 | 3.10 | Bottom 50% | Caucasian | 2.0% |
| 2010 | FL | 22 | 3.70 | Top 25% | Hispanic | 0.4% |
| 2010 | TX | 21 | 2.90 | Top 35% | Hispanic | 0.1% |
| 2010 | LA | 20 | 3.10 | Top 15% | African-American | 0.0% |
| 2009 | FL | 2350 | 4.00 | Top 1% | Hispanic | 100.0% |
| 2009 | (Private) | 2260 | 3.20 | Unknown | Hispanic | 100.0% |
| 2009 | TX | 2260 | 4.00 | Valedictorian | East Asian | 100.0% |
| 2009 | GA | 2200 | 3.20 | Top 30% | African-American | 100.0% |
| 2009 | TX | 2190 | 3.92 | Top 1% | East Asian | 100.0% |
| 2009 | CA | 2190 | 3.35 | Class Not Ranked | South Asian | 100.0% |
| 2009 | TX | 2170 | 3.80 | Top 20% | South Asian | 100.0% |
| 2009 | TX | 2170 | 3.80 | Top 20% | South Asian | 100.0% |
| 2009 | NY | 2170 | 4.00 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 100.0% |
| 2009 | TX | 2140 | 3.94 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 100.0% |
| 2009 | TX | 2120 | 2.72 | Unknown | South Asian | 100.0% |
| 2009 | FL | 2110 | 3.85 | Top 1% | South Asian | 100.0% |
| 2009 | TX | 2070 | 3.70 | Valedictorian | Caucasian | 100.0% |
| 2009 | TX | 2050 | 3.39 | Top 40% | Caucasian | 100.0% |
| 2009 | TX | 2050 | 3.00 | Unknown | Caucasian | 100.0% |
| 2009 | TX | 2030 | 3.20 | Top 30% | East Asian | 99.9% |
| 2009 | TX | 2020 | 3.41 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 99.9% |
| 2009 | TX | 2020 | 4.00 | Top 1% | East Asian | 99.9% |
| 2009 | MA | 2010 | 3.06 | Bottom 50% | East Asian | 100.0% |
| 2009 | TX | 1990 | 3.73 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 100.0% |
| 2009 | MA | 1990 | 3.47 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 99.8% |
| 2009 | NJ | 1970 | 3.00 | Class Not Ranked | Other | 100.0% |
| 2009 | NJ | 1970 | 3.00 | Class Not Ranked | Other | 99.7% |
| 2009 | CA | 1960 | 3.78 | Top 5% | East Asian | 100.0% |
| 2009 | CO | 1950 | 3.95 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 99.9% |
| 2009 | TX | 1950 | 2.96 | Top 40% | African-American | 99.4% |
| 2009 | TX | 1950 | 3.65 | Unknown | None Indicated | 99.4% |
| 2009 | XX | 1950 | 3.90 | Top 1% | South Asian | 99.4% |
| 2009 | TX | 1950 | 3.50 | Top 10% | East Asian | 99.4% |
| 2009 | (Private) | 1920 | 3.39 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 99.4% |
| 2009 | (Private) | 1920 | 3.30 | Top 10% | Hispanic | 98.8% |
| 2009 | TX | 1870 | 3.30 | Top 30% | Caucasian | 95.4% |
| 2009 | TX | 1850 | 4.00 | Top 20% | Hispanic | 92.8% |
| 2009 | TX | 1850 | 3.00 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 92.8% |
| 2009 | XX | 1850 | 3.90 | Top 10% | East Asian | 92.8% |
| 2009 | XX | 1840 | 3.58 | Top 5% | South Asian | 90.5% |
| 2009 | TX | 1800 | 3.50 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 88.2% |
| 2009 | NJ | 1800 | 3.75 | Top 20% | East Asian | 77.3% |
| 2009 | TX | 1790 | 3.30 | Top 20% | Hispanic | 72.9% |
| 2009 | FL | 1780 | 3.30 | Class Not Ranked | Hispanic | 66.3% |
| 2009 | TX | 1760 | 3.55 | Top 20% | Hispanic | 55.1% |
| 2009 | LA | 1740 | 3.50 | Top 20% | Hispanic | 41.4% |
| 2009 | TX | 1740 | 3.16 | Top 30% | South Asian | 41.4% |
| 2009 | CA | 1740 | 3.42 | Unknown | South Asian | 41.4% |
| 2009 | TX | 1730 | 3.37 | Unknown | African-American | 88.2% |
| 2009 | TX | 1720 | 3.84 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 29.0% |
| 2009 | TX | 1700 | 3.40 | Top 20% | East Asian | 88.2% |
| 2009 | TX | 1700 | 3.60 | Top 30% | Hispanic | 20.3% |
| 2009 | (Private) | 1670 | 3.76 | Top 30% | Caucasian | 10.4% |
| 2009 | TX | 1650 | 3.85 | Top 20% | Hispanic | 6.3% |
| 2009 | TX | 1640 | 3.85 | Top 20% | None Indicated | 5.0% |
| 2009 | MA | 1640 | 3.60 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 5.0% |
| 2009 | TX | 1630 | 3.56 | Top 40% | Caucasian | 3.7% |
| 2009 | TX | 1620 | 3.55 | Top 20% | Hispanic | 3.0% |
| 2009 | TX | 1610 | 3.50 | Valedictorian | Hispanic | 2.3% |
| 2009 | TX | 1530 | 3.50 | Top 40% | African-American | 0.3% |
| 2009 | CA | 1510 | 3.00 | Unknown | East Asian | 97.3% |
| 2009 | TX | 1490 | 3.00 | Top 15% | Caucasian | 0.1% |
| 2009 | TX | 1410 | 3.72 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 0.0% |
| 2009 | TX | 1410 | 2.96 | Top 20% | South Asian | 0.0% |
| 2009 | TX | 1340 | 3.42 | Top 30% | Caucasian | 0.0% |
| 2009 | TX | 1320 | 3.00 | Top 40% | Hispanic | 0.0% |
| 2009 | TX | 1280 | 3.00 | Bottom 50% | African-American | 0.0% |
| 2009 | MD | 1280 | 3.00 | Top 30% | African-American | 98.8% |
| 2009 | TX | 1210 | 3.17 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 83.5% |
| 2009 | TX | 36 | 3.40 | Bottom 50% | Caucasian | 100.0% |
| 2009 | CA | 31 | 3.40 | Top 40% | None Indicated | 100.0% |
| 2009 | TX | 30 | 3.80 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 99.9% |
| 2009 | IL | 29 | 2.50 | Unknown | Caucasian | 99.4% |
| 2009 | TX | 29 | 3.70 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 99.4% |
| 2009 | MN | 28 | 3.39 | Top 30% | Caucasian | 97.3% |
| 2009 | LA | 27 | 3.40 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 88.2% |
| 2009 | TX | 27 | 3.90 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 88.2% |
| 2009 | AR | 26 | 3.10 | Top 20% | East Asian | 69.7% |
| 2009 | AR | 26 | 3.00 | Bottom 30% | East Asian | 69.7% |
| 2009 | TX | 26 | 3.70 | Valedictorian | African-American | 69.7% |
| 2009 | TX | 26 | 3.60 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 69.7% |
| 2009 | MI | 24 | 3.25 | Bottom 50% | Caucasian | 9.0% |
| 2009 | TX | 22 | 3.20 | Top 30% | Caucasian | 0.4% |
| 2009 | XX | 20 | 3.50 | Top 30% | South Asian | 0.0% |
| 2009 | TX | 19 | 3.20 | Top 30% | African-American | 0.0% |
| 2008 | XX | 2400 | 3.90 | Top 1% | Other | 100.0% |
| 2008 | TX | 2350 | 4.00 | Valedictorian | East Asian | 100.0% |
| 2008 | TX | 2320 | 3.90 | Unknown | East Asian | 100.0% |
| 2008 | TX | 2170 | 3.80 | Top 10% | Hispanic | 100.0% |
| 2008 | TX | 2110 | 3.85 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 100.0% |
| 2008 | TX | 2100 | 3.89 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 100.0% |
| 2008 | TX | 2050 | 3.75 | Top 10% | Hispanic | 100.0% |
| 2008 | CA | 2040 | 3.60 | Top 10% | Hispanic | 100.0% |
| 2008 | MI | 2020 | 4.00 | Unknown | African-American | 99.9% |
| 2008 | TX | 2020 | 3.80 | Unknown | African-American | 99.9% |
| 2008 | (Private) | 1960 | 3.00 | Bottom 50% | Caucasian | 99.9% |
| 2008 | TX | 1960 | 3.37 | Unknown | Caucasian | 99.5% |
| 2008 | TX | 1940 | 3.80 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 99.3% |
| 2008 | TX | 1900 | 3.80 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 97.9% |
| 2008 | AR | 1860 | 3.69 | Top 20% | None Indicated | 100.0% |
| 2008 | TX | 1860 | 3.40 | Top 20% | East Asian | 94.3% |
| 2008 | XX | 1840 | 3.90 | Top 5% | Middle-Eastern | 90.5% |
| 2008 | CA | 1820 | 3.11 | Bottom 50% | Other | 85.5% |
| 2008 | TX | 1800 | 3.52 | Top 20% | None Indicated | 88.2% |
| 2008 | AZ | 1780 | 3.00 | Top 40% | Caucasian | 66.3% |
| 2008 | WA | 1740 | 3.89 | Top 5% | Hispanic | 41.4% |
| 2008 | PA | 1710 | 3.94 | Bottom 30% | African-American | 24.3% |
| 2008 | TX | 1650 | 3.50 | Unknown | Caucasian | 6.3% |
| 2008 | XX | 1500 | 2.00 | Class Not Ranked | Middle-Eastern | 0.1% |
| 2008 | TX | 1310 | 3.45 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 0.0% |
| 2008 | TX | 32 | 3.38 | Top 40% | South Asian | 100.0% |
| 2008 | MN | 30 | 3.45 | Unknown | Caucasian | 99.9% |
| 2008 | KS | 29 | 3.95 | Salutatorian | Caucasian | 99.4% |
| 2008 | TX | 29 | 3.25 | Unknown | Caucasian | 99.4% |
| 2008 | (Private) | 27 | 3.15 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 88.2% |
| 2008 | IL | 24 | 3.64 | Top 10% | None Indicated | 9.0% |
| 2008 | IL | 24 | 3.13 | Bottom 50% | Caucasian | 9.0% |
| 2007 | TX | 2060 | 3.70 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 100.0% |
| 2007 | TX | 2050 | 3.00 | Bottom 50% | Caucasian | 100.0% |
| 2007 | TX | 2040 | 3.80 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 100.0% |
| 2007 | OK | 850 | 2.83 | Bottom 40% | Caucasian | 0.0% |
| 2006 | TX | 2140 | 4.00 | Class Not Ranked | South Asian | 100.0% |
| 2006 | TX | 1780 | 3.30 | Top 40% | South Asian | 66.3% |
| 2006 | TX | 1200 | 3.15 | Top 40% | East Asian | 100.0% |
| 2004 | XX | 27 | 3.31 | Unknown | Other | 88.2% |
| |