Syracuse University Applications and Decisions
Below is a list of applicants who have demonstrated interest in Syracuse University. Our best formula
for this college is based on
114 members who were accepted or rejected. The formula
has a college admissions prediction accuracy of
96%?.
Because not all members have filled out the most recent version of our survey, some predictions are made based on
less-accurate models. Those are noted with an asterisk (*) next to their prediction.
This is a very popular school, so we're only showing you profiles that have received an admissions decision. If you
want to see all applicants to this school,
click here (caution: the page will take awhile to load).
|
| 2009 | NY | 2090 | 3.80 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 99.9% |
| 2009 | OH | 1760 | 3.64 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 99.8% |
| 2009 | PA | 1730 | 3.60 | Top 30% | South Asian | 93.8% |
| 2009 | CA | 1680 | 2.82 | Unknown | African-American | 53.3% |
| 2009 | MA | 1610 | 3.60 | Top 30% | Caucasian | 93.2% |
| 2009 | NJ | 1510 | 3.30 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 93.7% |
| 2009 | CT | 33 | 3.50 | Top 30% | Caucasian | 92.7% |
| 2009 | NY | 27 | 3.30 | Top 20% | Hispanic | 91.3% |
| 2008 | NY | 2010 | 3.65 | Unknown | Caucasian | 99.4% |
| 2008 | PA | 1800 | 3.00 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 79.0% |
| 2008 | NY | 1490 | 3.75 | Top 20% | None Indicated | 99.0% |
| 2007 | VA | 2020 | 3.20 | Top 20% | South Asian | 87.4% |
| 2007 | PA | 1940 | 3.51 | Top 30% | Caucasian | 91.6% |
| 2007 | CA | 1810 | 3.40 | Top 10% | East Asian | 98.4% |
| 2000 | NY | 2360 | 4.00 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 100.0% |
|
| 2010 | NJ | 2400 | 4.00 | Valedictorian | Hispanic | 100.0% |
| 2010 | PA | 2250 | 3.99 | Top 1% | South Asian | 100.0% |
| 2010 | NY | 2180 | 3.50 | Top 10% | East Asian | 99.3% |
| 2010 | CA | 2160 | 3.70 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 99.8% |
| 2010 | VA | 2130 | 3.50 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 97.7% |
| 2010 | NJ | 2120 | 3.80 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 99.9% |
| 2010 | NJ | 2100 | 3.60 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 99.3% |
| 2010 | VA | 2100 | 3.60 | Top 15% | Caucasian | 99.3% |
| 2010 | NH | 2080 | 3.72 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 99.9% |
| 2010 | NJ | 2080 | 3.76 | Top 10% | East Asian | 99.8% |
| 2010 | NY | 2080 | 3.70 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 99.6% |
| 2010 | MA | 2080 | 3.70 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 99.8% |
| 2010 | PA | 2060 | 3.95 | Top 1% | Caucasian | 100.0% |
| 2010 | NJ | 2020 | 3.54 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 98.9% |
| 2010 | NY | 2010 | 4.00 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 100.0% |
| 2010 | MA | 2000 | 3.37 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 94.7% |
| 2010 | NY | 2000 | 4.00 | Top 5% | African-American | 100.0% |
| 2010 | MD | 2000 | 3.81 | Class Not Ranked | Hispanic | 99.8% |
| 2010 | CA | 1990 | 3.74 | Top 15% | None Indicated | 99.6% |
| 2010 | NY | 1980 | 3.60 | Class Not Ranked | East Asian | 99.2% |
| 2010 | NY | 1960 | 3.86 | Top 15% | Caucasian | 99.8% |
| 2010 | FL | 1930 | 3.78 | Top 10% | South Asian | 99.8% |
| 2010 | CA | 1920 | 3.75 | Top 10% | East Asian | 99.8% |
| 2010 | NY | 1920 | 3.60 | Top 20% | Other | 98.4% |
| 2010 | (Private) | 1910 | 3.40 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 97.3% |
| 2010 | XX | 1910 | 3.30 | Class Not Ranked | East Asian | 95.4% |
| 2010 | CT | 1910 | 3.44 | Class Not Ranked | East Asian | 97.9% |
| 2010 | XX | 1900 | 3.44 | Top 15% | Middle-Eastern | 97.8% |
| 2010 | (Private) | 1890 | 3.54 | Top 5% | None Indicated | 99.6% |
| 2010 | NJ | 1860 | 3.50 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 99.1% |
| 2010 | (Private) | 1840 | 3.85 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 99.8% |
| 2010 | NY | 1830 | 3.64 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 99.7% |
| 2010 | (Private) | 1820 | 3.60 | Top 5% | Hispanic | 99.7% |
| 2010 | AR | 1810 | 3.70 | Class Not Ranked | African-American | 99.5% |
| 2010 | CA | 1790 | 3.50 | Unknown | Caucasian | 98.3% |
| 2010 | PA | 1770 | 3.62 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 99.5% |
| 2010 | IL | 1750 | 3.78 | Top 15% | Caucasian | 99.6% |
| 2010 | FL | 1710 | 3.60 | Top 10% | African-American | 99.4% |
| 2010 | NY | 1710 | 3.00 | Bottom 50% | Hispanic | 4.0% |
| 2010 | NJ | 1660 | 3.50 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 96.6% |
| 2010 | NY | 1640 | 3.70 | Top 15% | Caucasian | 99.4% |
| 2010 | NY | 1620 | 3.60 | Top 30% | Caucasian | 93.3% |
| 2010 | NY | 1600 | 3.30 | Top 30% | Caucasian | 71.4% |
| 2010 | NY | 1520 | 3.67 | Top 10% | Hispanic | 99.6% |
| 2010 | NY | 1520 | 3.60 | Top 15% | Middle-Eastern | 98.8% |
| 2010 | NY | 1480 | 3.50 | Top 30% | Caucasian | 87.5% |
| 2010 | DC | 33 | 3.95 | Top 5% | African-American | 100.0% |
| 2010 | CA | 32 | 3.50 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 98.7% |
| 2010 | OR | 32 | 4.00 | Top 3% | Caucasian | 100.0% |
| 2010 | NY | 27 | 3.90 | Top 10% | None Indicated | 99.9% |
| 2009 | NY | 2230 | 3.80 | Unknown | Caucasian | 99.8% |
| 2009 | GA | 2230 | 3.50 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 98.8% |
| 2009 | PA | 2230 | 3.45 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 97.1% |
| 2009 | PA | 2190 | 3.80 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 99.9% |
| 2009 | XX | 2190 | 3.00 | Top 10% | Middle-Eastern | 90.0% |
| 2009 | MS | 2170 | 3.90 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 100.0% |
| 2009 | RI | 2170 | 3.95 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 100.0% |
| 2009 | TX | 2160 | 3.92 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 99.9% |
| 2009 | CT | 2150 | 3.60 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 99.3% |
| 2009 | XX | 2150 | 3.70 | Top 1% | East Asian | 99.9% |
| 2009 | NH | 2140 | 3.89 | Top 5% | Hispanic | 100.0% |
| 2009 | CT | 2120 | 3.70 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 99.6% |
| 2009 | NY | 2110 | 3.70 | Class Not Ranked | East Asian | 99.6% |
| 2009 | CA | 2100 | 4.00 | Valedictorian | Caucasian | 100.0% |
| 2009 | OR | 2080 | 3.81 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 99.6% |
| 2009 | NY | 2080 | 3.99 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 100.0% |
| 2009 | MA | 2080 | 3.86 | Top 1% | Caucasian | 100.0% |
| 2009 | (Private) | 2060 | 3.33 | Class Not Ranked | South Asian | 96.5% |
| 2009 | NY | 2050 | 3.84 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 99.9% |
| 2009 | RI | 2050 | 3.88 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 99.8% |
| 2009 | NJ | 2040 | 3.71 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 99.6% |
| 2009 | NJ | 2040 | 3.60 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 98.5% |
| 2009 | NY | 2030 | 2.90 | Class Not Ranked | South Asian | 70.6% |
| 2009 | MA | 2030 | 3.96 | Salutatorian | Caucasian | 100.0% |
| 2009 | NY | 2020 | 3.40 | Unknown | Caucasian | 97.6% |
| 2009 | CT | 2000 | 3.00 | Class Not Ranked | East Asian | 80.5% |
| 2009 | PA | 1980 | 3.65 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 99.4% |
| 2009 | NC | 1950 | 3.30 | Top 30% | Caucasian | 77.0% |
| 2009 | CA | 1940 | 3.29 | Unknown | South Asian | 95.3% |
| 2009 | NY | 1920 | 3.80 | Unknown | East Asian | 99.7% |
| 2009 | CA | 1910 | 3.40 | Top 30% | African-American | 86.1% |
| 2009 | NY | 1900 | 3.60 | Top 40% | Caucasian | 83.4% |
| 2009 | FL | 1890 | 3.70 | Top 10% | East Asian | 99.7% |
| 2009 | CA | 1880 | 3.40 | Class Not Ranked | None Indicated | 97.4% |
| 2009 | NY | 1860 | 3.40 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 97.2% |
| 2009 | NH | 1860 | 3.22 | Top 20% | African-American | 87.2% |
| 2009 | NY | 1850 | 3.64 | Top 30% | South Asian | 95.5% |
| 2009 | CA | 1850 | 3.20 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 85.8% |
| 2009 | PA | 1850 | 2.90 | Unknown | South Asian | 67.4% |
| 2009 | RI | 1850 | 3.50 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 97.1% |
| 2009 | NY | 1840 | 3.65 | Top 20% | East Asian | 98.7% |
| 2009 | NY | 1820 | 3.85 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 99.9% |
| 2009 | NJ | 1820 | 3.43 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 97.6% |
| 2009 | MA | 1800 | 3.30 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 95.6% |
| 2009 | NY | 1780 | 3.80 | Top 20% | East Asian | 99.4% |
| 2009 | NY | 1770 | 2.90 | Unknown | Caucasian | 65.9% |
| 2009 | NY | 1730 | 3.00 | Class Not Ranked | Hispanic | 76.7% |
| 2009 | NY | 1700 | 3.85 | Class Not Ranked | Hispanic | 99.8% |
| 2009 | MA | 1620 | 3.20 | Class Not Ranked | East Asian | 90.3% |
| 2009 | MD | 1470 | 3.40 | Top 20% | African-American | 93.2% |
| 2009 | NY | 1150 | 3.67 | Class Not Ranked | African-American | 99.3% |
| 2009 | CA | 32 | 3.40 | Class Not Ranked | Hispanic | 97.8% |
| 2009 | CA | 31 | 3.50 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 98.7% |
| 2009 | OH | 31 | 3.85 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 99.9% |
| 2009 | IL | 31 | 3.64 | Class Not Ranked | East Asian | 99.4% |
| 2009 | NY | 30 | 3.50 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 98.6% |
| 2009 | NY | 28 | 3.50 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 98.4% |
| 2008 | NJ | 2230 | 3.70 | Unknown | Caucasian | 99.6% |
| 2008 | XX | 2230 | 3.50 | Class Not Ranked | Other | 98.8% |
| 2008 | NJ | 2210 | 3.85 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 99.8% |
| 2008 | NY | 2190 | 4.00 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 100.0% |
| 2008 | VA | 2140 | 3.89 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 99.9% |
| 2008 | (Private) | 2130 | 3.60 | Unknown | East Asian | 99.3% |
| 2008 | CA | 2080 | 3.90 | Top 1% | Caucasian | 100.0% |
| 2008 | MD | 2080 | 3.63 | Unknown | Hispanic | 99.4% |
| 2008 | MA | 2060 | 4.00 | Valedictorian | None Indicated | 100.0% |
| 2008 | CO | 2060 | 3.00 | Unknown | Caucasian | 81.2% |
| 2008 | MD | 2040 | 3.76 | Top 10% | South Asian | 99.8% |
| 2008 | NY | 1990 | 3.20 | Top 20% | South Asian | 87.2% |
| 2008 | NJ | 1980 | 3.00 | Unknown | Caucasian | 80.2% |
| 2008 | AZ | 1950 | 3.30 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 95.6% |
| 2008 | PA | 1930 | 3.70 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 99.7% |
| 2008 | OH | 1920 | 3.53 | Unknown | Caucasian | 98.7% |
| 2008 | NY | 1920 | 3.70 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 99.7% |
| 2008 | CT | 1900 | 3.60 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 99.5% |
| 2008 | CA | 1850 | 3.89 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 99.9% |
| 2008 | NY | 1800 | 3.61 | Unknown | East Asian | 99.1% |
| 2008 | SC | 1720 | 3.78 | Top 30% | African-American | 97.6% |
| 2008 | LA | 29 | 3.67 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 98.9% |
| 2008 | IL | 19 | 3.00 | Top 10% | African-American | 81.9% |
| 2007 | XX | 2240 | 4.00 | Top 5% | African-American | 100.0% |
| 2007 | NY | 1920 | 3.65 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 99.7% |
| 2007 | CA | 1720 | 3.70 | Top 10% | None Indicated | 99.7% |
| 2007 | MD | 1700 | 3.37 | Unknown | Caucasian | 96.3% |
| 2007 | OR | 1490 | 3.75 | Top 10% | East Asian | 99.7% |
| 2007 | CA | 33 | 3.83 | Class Not Ranked | Other | 99.8% |
| 2007 | MN | 27 | 3.94 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 99.9% |
| 2006 | NY | 1550 | 3.68 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 99.6% |
| 2006 | MI | 29 | 3.57 | Unknown | Caucasian | 99.0% |
|
|
| 2011 | MA | 1670 | 3.60 | Unknown | Native American | 98.9% |
| 2010 | NY | 1840 | 3.20 | Class Not Ranked | Hispanic | 91.8% |
| 2010 | NJ | 1660 | 2.60 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 25.4% |
| 2010 | NJ | 1460 | 3.07 | Top 30% | Caucasian | 38.2% |
| 2009 | CA | 2040 | 2.50 | Class Not Ranked | South Asian | 20.5% |
| 2009 | CA | 1980 | 3.48 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 98.5% |
| 2009 | MD | 1900 | 3.50 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 97.2% |
| 2009 | NH | 1730 | 2.70 | Top 40% | Caucasian | 2.6% |
| 2009 | (Private) | 1710 | 2.99 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 75.3% |
| 2009 | NY | 1560 | 3.50 | Top 5% | South Asian | 99.4% |
| 2009 | NY | 1320 | 2.89 | Top 20% | Native American | 41.2% |
| 2008 | NC | 1990 | 2.76 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 51.2% |
| 2008 | PA | 1950 | 3.30 | Top 30% | African-American | 77.0% |
| 2008 | NY | 1860 | 3.05 | Unknown | Caucasian | 82.9% |
| 2008 | NJ | 1650 | 3.40 | Bottom 50% | Caucasian | 27.7% |
| 2006 | XX | 1460 | 2.35 | Bottom 40% | East Asian | 0.0% |
| |