Susquehanna University Applications and Decisions
Below is a list of applicants who have demonstrated interest in Susquehanna University. Our best formula
for this college is based on
7 members who were accepted or rejected. The formula
has a college admissions prediction accuracy of
100%?.
Because not all members have filled out the most recent version of our survey, some predictions are made based on
less-accurate models. Those are noted with an asterisk (*) next to their prediction.
|
| 2009 | CT | 1650 | 3.40 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 96.0% |
|
| 2010 | (Private) | 2130 | 3.84 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 99.0% |
| 2010 | NJ | 1860 | 3.60 | Top 25% | Caucasian | 98.3% |
| 2010 | NJ | 1790 | 2.20 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 88.0% |
| 2010 | NJ | 1730 | 3.40 | Top 30% | Caucasian | 97.4% |
| 2010 | NJ | 1680 | 3.10 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 94.9% |
| 2009 | NJ | 2030 | 3.76 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 98.9% |
| 2009 | ME | 1960 | 3.72 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 98.7% |
| 2009 | (Private) | 1930 | 3.25 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 97.4% |
| 2009 | PA | 1820 | 3.55 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 97.8% |
| 2009 | PA | 1680 | 4.00 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 98.1% |
| 2008 | NY | 2040 | 3.80 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 99.1% |
|
| 2010 | MA | 1960 | 3.59 | Class Not Ranked | None Indicated | 98.4% |
| 2010 | NY | 1840 | 3.30 | Unknown | Caucasian | 97.1% |
| 2010 | NJ | 1500 | 2.70 | Class Not Ranked | Hispanic | 89.5% |
| 2009 | NY | 2090 | 4.00 | Top 1% | East Asian | 99.3% |
| 2009 | ME | 1840 | 3.20 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 97.8% |
| 2009 | (Private) | 1810 | 3.10 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 96.3% |
| 2009 | PA | 1550 | 3.85 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 97.6% |
|
| 2011 | NY | 1800 | 3.50 | Top 30% | Caucasian | 98.0% |
| 2010 | NY | 2050 | 3.80 | Class Not Ranked | Hispanic | 99.0% |
| 2010 | PA | 2050 | 4.00 | Valedictorian | Caucasian | 99.0% |
| 2010 | NY | 2010 | 3.72 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 98.8% |
| 2010 | PA | 1940 | 3.60 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 98.2% |
| 2010 | NJ | 1920 | 3.72 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 98.4% |
| 2010 | PA | 1890 | 3.80 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 98.5% |
| 2010 | XX | 1750 | 3.50 | Top 10% | None Indicated | 97.1% |
| 2010 | PA | 1710 | 3.00 | Top 35% | Caucasian | 95.8% |
| 2010 | NY | 1650 | 2.10 | Unknown | African-American | 83.0% |
| 2010 | PA | 1640 | 3.88 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 97.6% |
| 2010 | MD | 1640 | 3.60 | Top 30% | African-American | 97.6% |
| 2010 | NJ | 1570 | 3.52 | Top 30% | Caucasian | 96.9% |
| 2010 | NC | 1480 | 4.00 | Top 1% | Caucasian | 97.0% |
| 2010 | NJ | 1230 | 3.00 | Unknown | Hispanic | 86.9% |
| 2009 | PA | 2040 | 3.70 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 98.8% |
| 2009 | XX | 2040 | 3.75 | Top 1% | East Asian | 98.6% |
| 2009 | PA | 1840 | 3.42 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 97.6% |
| 2009 | XX | 1810 | 3.80 | Top 5% | South Asian | 98.1% |
| 2009 | ME | 1800 | 3.30 | Bottom 50% | Caucasian | 98.1% |
| 2009 | ME | 1750 | 3.50 | Top 30% | Caucasian | 97.8% |
| 2009 | ME | 1750 | 3.60 | Top 30% | Caucasian | 98.0% |
| 2009 | NY | 1590 | 2.10 | Unknown | African-American | 81.2% |
| 2009 | FL | 31 | 3.50 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 98.5% |
| 2008 | ME | 1870 | 3.30 | Bottom 40% | Caucasian | 98.5% |
| 2008 | NJ | 1800 | 3.70 | Unknown | Caucasian | 98.1% |
| 2008 | NJ | 1780 | 3.00 | Bottom 50% | Caucasian | 97.0% |
| 2008 | PA | 1750 | 2.90 | Unknown | Caucasian | 94.3% |
| 2008 | PA | 1650 | 3.50 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 96.9% |
| 2008 | PA | 1360 | 2.40 | Unknown | Caucasian | 80.0% |
| 2008 | NJ | 1350 | 3.47 | Top 20% | East Asian | 94.3% |
| 2007 | PA | 1640 | 3.10 | Unknown | None Indicated | 94.5% |
| |