Stony Brook University Applications and Decisions
Below is a list of applicants who have demonstrated interest in Stony Brook University. Our best formula
for this college is based on
84 members who were accepted or rejected. The formula
has a college admissions prediction accuracy of
94%?.
Because not all members have filled out the most recent version of our survey, some predictions are made based on
less-accurate models. Those are noted with an asterisk (*) next to their prediction.
This is a very popular school, and you're looking at the whole list. If you
would like to only see completed applications,
click here for a smaller version of this page.
|
| 2009 | (Private) | 2110 | 3.00 | Class Not Ranked | Hispanic | 96.9% |
| 2009 | NY | 2060 | 3.25 | Class Not Ranked | Middle-Eastern | 97.7% |
| 2009 | NY | 2050 | 3.70 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 99.3% |
| 2009 | NY | 2040 | 3.40 | Unknown | South Asian | 98.2% |
| 2009 | NJ | 1930 | 3.30 | Top 20% | South Asian | 94.1% |
| 2009 | NY | 1800 | 3.90 | Top 1% | East Asian | 98.5% |
| 2009 | NY | 28 | 3.00 | Top 40% | Other | 82.8% |
| 2008 | MA | 1630 | 3.60 | Unknown | East Asian | 74.8% |
| 2008 | NY | 1500 | 3.00 | Unknown | Hispanic | 20.4% |
|
| 2011 | PA | 1940 | 2.67 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 89.5% |
| 2010 | NY | 2270 | 3.64 | Class Not Ranked | South Asian | 99.9% |
| 2010 | MA | 2260 | 3.30 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 99.6% |
| 2010 | NY | 2200 | 4.00 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 99.9% |
| 2010 | NY | 2180 | 3.64 | Class Not Ranked | East Asian | 99.7% |
| 2010 | MA | 2130 | 3.92 | Top 3% | Caucasian | 99.8% |
| 2010 | TX | 2120 | 3.50 | Top 25% | South Asian | 99.3% |
| 2010 | NY | 2090 | 3.96 | Top 5% | South Asian | 99.8% |
| 2010 | NY | 2050 | 3.61 | Class Not Ranked | African-American | 99.1% |
| 2010 | (Private) | 2050 | 3.90 | Top 1% | Caucasian | 99.6% |
| 2010 | NY | 2030 | 3.40 | Unknown | East Asian | 99.2% |
| 2010 | MD | 2000 | 3.30 | Class Not Ranked | South Asian | 96.9% |
| 2010 | NY | 1980 | 3.33 | Class Not Ranked | East Asian | 96.4% |
| 2010 | NY | 1950 | 3.64 | Class Not Ranked | East Asian | 98.1% |
| 2010 | NY | 1930 | 3.44 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 96.6% |
| 2010 | NY | 1900 | 4.00 | Top 3% | Caucasian | 98.9% |
| 2010 | CT | 1880 | 3.89 | Top 15% | South Asian | 98.3% |
| 2010 | NY | 1860 | 3.90 | Top 20% | East Asian | 98.0% |
| 2010 | NY | 1840 | 3.20 | Class Not Ranked | Hispanic | 84.7% |
| 2010 | (Private) | 1820 | 3.60 | Top 5% | Hispanic | 93.8% |
| 2010 | NY | 1820 | 3.60 | Top 35% | Caucasian | 93.8% |
| 2010 | NY | 1760 | 3.40 | Unknown | South Asian | 83.6% |
| 2010 | NJ | 1740 | 3.40 | Class Not Ranked | Other | 81.0% |
| 2010 | NY | 1720 | 3.30 | Top 15% | Hispanic | 72.8% |
| 2010 | NJ | 1710 | 3.68 | Top 40% | South Asian | 88.1% |
| 2010 | NY | 1690 | 3.63 | Class Not Ranked | East Asian | 84.3% |
| 2010 | PA | 1690 | 4.00 | Top 20% | East Asian | 94.0% |
| 2010 | NJ | 1660 | 3.50 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 74.1% |
| 2010 | NY | 1620 | 3.50 | Top 25% | African-American | 89.3% |
| 2010 | NY | 1600 | 3.30 | Top 10% | Hispanic | 49.1% |
| 2010 | NY | 34 | 3.84 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 99.9% |
| 2010 | MA | 33 | 3.20 | Top 20% | African-American | 99.1% |
| 2010 | NY | 28 | 3.58 | Top 25% | Caucasian | 96.3% |
| 2009 | (Private) | 2340 | 4.00 | Top 1% | None Indicated | 100.0% |
| 2009 | NY | 2280 | 4.00 | Salutatorian | East Asian | 100.0% |
| 2009 | NY | 2150 | 3.48 | Class Not Ranked | Middle-Eastern | 99.4% |
| 2009 | NY | 2150 | 3.93 | Top 10% | South Asian | 99.8% |
| 2009 | CA | 2120 | 3.50 | Unknown | South Asian | 99.3% |
| 2009 | NY | 2110 | 3.70 | Class Not Ranked | East Asian | 99.6% |
| 2009 | NY | 2110 | 3.80 | Class Not Ranked | East Asian | 99.7% |
| 2009 | NY | 2110 | 3.70 | Top 5% | Hispanic | 99.6% |
| 2009 | NY | 2110 | 3.60 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 99.4% |
| 2009 | NY | 2090 | 3.44 | Class Not Ranked | Middle-Eastern | 99.0% |
| 2009 | NJ | 2090 | 3.50 | Top 20% | Middle-Eastern | 99.1% |
| 2009 | NY | 2070 | 3.87 | Class Not Ranked | East Asian | 99.6% |
| 2009 | NY | 2070 | 3.85 | Top 20% | East Asian | 99.6% |
| 2009 | NY | 2060 | 3.70 | Class Not Ranked | South Asian | 99.4% |
| 2009 | NY | 2010 | 3.75 | Top 1% | Hispanic | 99.1% |
| 2009 | NY | 2010 | 3.70 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 99.0% |
| 2009 | MA | 2000 | 3.48 | Top 20% | Other | 98.0% |
| 2009 | CA | 1970 | 3.20 | Unknown | Caucasian | 94.5% |
| 2009 | NY | 1970 | 3.60 | Top 10% | Hispanic | 98.2% |
| 2009 | NY | 1960 | 3.70 | Top 10% | African-American | 98.5% |
| 2009 | NY | 1950 | 3.24 | Class Not Ranked | Middle-Eastern | 94.1% |
| 2009 | NY | 1940 | 4.00 | Top 10% | None Indicated | 99.8% |
| 2009 | NY | 1910 | 3.60 | Class Not Ranked | East Asian | 97.0% |
| 2009 | NY | 1870 | 4.00 | Top 10% | African-American | 98.6% |
| 2009 | NY | 1860 | 3.60 | Top 20% | Other | 95.5% |
| 2009 | NY | 1840 | 3.65 | Top 20% | East Asian | 95.3% |
| 2009 | NY | 1830 | 3.90 | Top 20% | None Indicated | 97.5% |
| 2009 | NY | 1820 | 3.50 | Top 20% | South Asian | 92.4% |
| 2009 | NY | 1820 | 3.55 | Top 10% | East Asian | 92.9% |
| 2009 | NY | 1810 | 3.85 | Top 1% | Hispanic | 96.6% |
| 2009 | NY | 1800 | 3.75 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 95.1% |
| 2009 | NY | 1790 | 4.00 | Top 1% | East Asian | 97.4% |
| 2009 | NY | 1780 | 3.80 | Top 10% | Middle-Eastern | 95.0% |
| 2009 | NY | 1780 | 3.80 | Top 20% | East Asian | 95.0% |
| 2009 | NY | 28 | 3.60 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 96.5% |
| 2009 | NY | 26 | 3.76 | Top 1% | South Asian | 94.7% |
| 2008 | CT | 2370 | 3.98 | Top 1% | Caucasian | 100.0% |
| 2008 | NY | 2340 | 4.00 | Salutatorian | Caucasian | 100.0% |
| 2008 | (Private) | 2310 | 4.00 | Top 1% | Caucasian | 100.0% |
| 2008 | NY | 2290 | 4.00 | Valedictorian | None Indicated | 100.0% |
| 2008 | NY | 2290 | 3.96 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 100.0% |
| 2008 | NY | 2220 | 3.75 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 99.9% |
| 2008 | NY | 2190 | 4.00 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 99.9% |
| 2008 | NY | 2140 | 3.80 | Top 5% | South Asian | 99.8% |
| 2008 | NH | 2130 | 3.20 | Top 40% | Hispanic | 98.5% |
| 2008 | NJ | 2100 | 3.20 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 98.1% |
| 2008 | NY | 2060 | 3.70 | Unknown | Middle-Eastern | 99.4% |
| 2008 | NY | 2040 | 3.80 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 99.7% |
| 2008 | NY | 2000 | 3.65 | Top 20% | None Indicated | 98.8% |
| 2008 | CT | 2000 | 4.00 | Valedictorian | East Asian | 99.6% |
| 2008 | NY | 1990 | 3.20 | Top 20% | South Asian | 95.2% |
| 2008 | NY | 1820 | 3.30 | Top 30% | Caucasian | 86.4% |
| 2008 | NY | 1800 | 3.70 | Unknown | None Indicated | 99.6% |
| 2008 | NY | 1770 | 4.00 | Unknown | Hispanic | 98.1% |
| 2008 | NY | 1730 | 3.50 | Class Not Ranked | African-American | 84.1% |
| 2008 | NY | 1720 | 3.75 | Top 5% | Hispanic | 90.8% |
| 2008 | XX | 1540 | 3.97 | Top 10% | East Asian | 80.1% |
| 2008 | NY | 32 | 3.70 | Unknown | None Indicated | 99.6% |
| 2008 | NY | 32 | 3.60 | Top 10% | Hispanic | 99.5% |
| 2008 | (Private) | 30 | 3.56 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 98.5% |
| 2007 | NY | 2070 | 3.90 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 99.7% |
| 2007 | NY | 1910 | 3.75 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 98.0% |
| 2007 | NY | 1670 | 3.97 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 92.5% |
| 2006 | NY | 2180 | 3.87 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 99.9% |
|
| 2009 | MA | 1590 | 3.56 | Top 30% | East Asian | 65.5% |
| 2008 | NY | 1620 | 3.90 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 86.7% |
|
|
| 2009 | NY | 1630 | 3.30 | Top 40% | None Indicated | 55.5% |
| 2009 | NY | 1560 | 3.50 | Top 5% | South Asian | 55.3% |
| 2009 | NY | 1550 | 3.00 | Unknown | South Asian | 21.2% |
| 2009 | NY | 1310 | 3.40 | Top 10% | Hispanic | 10.0% |
| 2009 | NY | 1290 | 3.48 | Top 40% | African-American | 10.5% |
| 2008 | NY | 1650 | 2.70 | Top 40% | Caucasian | 20.8% |
| 2008 | FL | 1600 | 3.85 | Top 5% | African-American | 82.6% |
| 2008 | XX | 26 | 2.90 | Bottom 40% | Caucasian | 59.6% |
|
| 2011 | NJ | 1700 | 2.74 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 31.2% |
| 2010 | NY | 2160 | 3.90 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 99.8% |
| 2010 | NY | 2150 | 3.84 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 99.9% |
| 2010 | NJ | 2120 | 4.00 | Top 1% | East Asian | 99.8% |
| 2010 | NY | 2110 | 3.60 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 99.4% |
| 2010 | NY | 2010 | 3.20 | Bottom 50% | South Asian | 96.0% |
| 2010 | NY | 2000 | 3.70 | Unknown | Caucasian | 98.9% |
| 2010 | NJ | 1990 | 3.42 | Top 15% | East Asian | 97.4% |
| 2010 | XX | 1970 | 3.50 | Unknown | South Asian | 97.6% |
| 2010 | NY | 1950 | 3.75 | Top 30% | Other | 99.8% |
| 2010 | NY | 1940 | 3.68 | Top 15% | Caucasian | 98.1% |
| 2010 | NY | 1930 | 3.95 | Top 1% | Caucasian | 99.1% |
| 2010 | NY | 1910 | 3.40 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 94.8% |
| 2010 | NY | 1890 | 3.69 | Top 10% | Hispanic | 97.2% |
| 2010 | NY | 1890 | 3.30 | Top 40% | Caucasian | 92.0% |
| 2010 | NY | 1890 | 2.70 | Unknown | Caucasian | 66.8% |
| 2010 | PA | 1880 | 2.98 | Unknown | South Asian | 80.8% |
| 2010 | (Private) | 1840 | 3.40 | Top 30% | Caucasian | 90.8% |
| 2010 | MA | 1820 | 3.35 | Unknown | Caucasian | 88.0% |
| 2010 | NJ | 1810 | 2.80 | Class Not Ranked | East Asian | 57.5% |
| 2010 | NY | 1790 | 3.24 | Unknown | East Asian | 80.6% |
| 2010 | NY | 1750 | 3.70 | Top 20% | Other | 91.7% |
| 2010 | NH | 1750 | 3.40 | Top 10% | South Asian | 82.2% |
| 2010 | NY | 1700 | 2.80 | Class Not Ranked | South Asian | 35.1% |
| 2010 | NY | 1690 | 2.90 | Bottom 50% | Caucasian | 39.5% |
| 2010 | NY | 1680 | 3.72 | Top 25% | Caucasian | 90.5% |
| 2010 | NY | 1680 | 3.28 | Bottom 50% | Caucasian | 64.4% |
| 2010 | NY | 1680 | 3.65 | Top 3% | Caucasian | 84.1% |
| 2010 | NJ | 1660 | 3.34 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 64.3% |
| 2010 | NY | 1640 | 3.60 | Top 15% | South Asian | 76.7% |
| 2010 | NY | 1630 | 3.70 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 93.7% |
| 2010 | NY | 1580 | 3.44 | Top 15% | Native American | 55.4% |
| 2010 | NY | 1550 | 3.40 | Unknown | East Asian | 46.2% |
| 2010 | NY | 1520 | 3.60 | Top 15% | Middle-Eastern | 54.2% |
| 2010 | NY | 1520 | 3.30 | Top 15% | African-American | 33.2% |
| 2010 | NY | 1500 | 3.50 | Top 15% | East Asian | 42.6% |
| 2010 | XX | 1490 | 3.00 | Bottom 40% | Hispanic | 13.9% |
| 2010 | SC | 1440 | 3.78 | Class Not Ranked | East Asian | 50.1% |
| 2010 | NY | 1410 | 3.60 | Unknown | Hispanic | 31.6% |
| 2010 | NY | 1390 | 2.80 | Top 20% | East Asian | 93.4% |
| 2010 | NY | 1380 | 3.20 | Unknown | Hispanic | 10.1% |
| 2010 | (Private) | 1230 | 1.00 | Unknown | Hispanic | 0.0% |
| 2010 | NY | 31 | 3.50 | Unknown | Caucasian | 98.9% |
| 2010 | NY | 29 | 3.00 | Class Not Ranked | East Asian | 88.9% |
| 2010 | NY | 26 | 3.00 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 66.3% |
| 2009 | CT | 2280 | 2.90 | Bottom 50% | None Indicated | 99.0% |
| 2009 | NY | 2030 | 3.82 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 99.4% |
| 2009 | NY | 2000 | 4.00 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 99.9% |
| 2009 | NY | 2000 | 3.50 | Top 10% | Hispanic | 98.1% |
| 2009 | NJ | 1990 | 3.50 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 97.9% |
| 2009 | XX | 1960 | 4.00 | Valedictorian | East Asian | 99.4% |
| 2009 | NJ | 1950 | 3.10 | Class Not Ranked | East Asian | 91.4% |
| 2009 | NY | 1910 | 3.60 | Class Not Ranked | Middle-Eastern | 97.0% |
| 2009 | NY | 1910 | 3.50 | Top 20% | South Asian | 96.1% |
| 2009 | NY | 1860 | 3.70 | Top 10% | East Asian | 96.6% |
| 2009 | XX | 1850 | 3.15 | Bottom 50% | East Asian | 84.2% |
| 2009 | NY | 1840 | 3.60 | Top 5% | Middle-Eastern | 94.6% |
| 2009 | NY | 1830 | 3.00 | Unknown | Other | 82.8% |
| 2009 | NY | 1830 | 3.33 | Top 40% | Caucasian | 92.6% |
| 2009 | RI | 1820 | 3.40 | Top 30% | Caucasian | 89.5% |
| 2009 | MA | 1790 | 2.80 | Top 30% | Caucasian | 53.7% |
| 2009 | NY | 1760 | 3.60 | Unknown | Caucasian | 90.1% |
| 2009 | NY | 1740 | 3.60 | Class Not Ranked | East Asian | 88.4% |
| 2009 | NY | 1710 | 3.50 | Class Not Ranked | African-American | 81.5% |
| 2009 | CT | 1630 | 3.40 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 62.5% |
| 2009 | WA | 1620 | 2.99 | Top 20% | East Asian | 32.0% |
| 2009 | NY | 1620 | 3.80 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 83.1% |
| 2009 | NY | 1610 | 3.34 | Top 30% | East Asian | 54.5% |
| 2009 | NY | 1600 | 3.50 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 63.3% |
| 2009 | NJ | 1510 | 3.30 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 31.0% |
| 2009 | NJ | 1450 | 3.30 | Top 40% | Middle-Eastern | 50.4% |
| 2009 | (Private) | 1450 | 3.30 | Top 30% | Caucasian | 21.3% |
| 2009 | NY | 1410 | 3.32 | Unknown | Caucasian | 17.0% |
| 2009 | NY | 1150 | 2.90 | Unknown | None Indicated | 46.9% |
| 2009 | NJ | 21 | 2.90 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 10.3% |
| 2008 | NY | 2370 | 3.93 | Class Not Ranked | East Asian | 100.0% |
| 2008 | NY | 2230 | 3.80 | Top 10% | East Asian | 99.9% |
| 2008 | NY | 2090 | 3.83 | Class Not Ranked | East Asian | 99.8% |
| 2008 | NY | 2060 | 3.85 | Top 5% | None Indicated | 99.9% |
| 2008 | NY | 2010 | 3.78 | Top 10% | East Asian | 99.2% |
| 2008 | NY | 2000 | 4.00 | Top 5% | East Asian | 99.6% |
| 2008 | NY | 1970 | 3.60 | Top 20% | East Asian | 98.2% |
| 2008 | NY | 1960 | 3.80 | Top 1% | Hispanic | 98.9% |
| 2008 | NY | 1960 | 3.80 | Top 5% | East Asian | 98.9% |
| 2008 | NY | 1800 | 3.61 | Unknown | East Asian | 92.9% |
| 2008 | NY | 1800 | 3.40 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 87.7% |
| 2008 | NY | 1790 | 3.40 | Unknown | None Indicated | 86.8% |
| 2008 | NY | 1720 | 3.86 | Top 20% | Other | 93.4% |
| 2008 | CA | 1720 | 3.17 | Unknown | Other | 64.7% |
| 2008 | NY | 1600 | 3.50 | Unknown | East Asian | 63.3% |
| 2008 | XX | 1580 | 2.91 | Unknown | East Asian | 21.1% |
| 2008 | NY | 23 | 3.47 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 62.4% |
| 2008 | NY | 21 | 3.90 | Top 1% | South Asian | 67.5% |
| 2007 | NH | 2100 | 3.70 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 99.5% |
| 2007 | NY | 1970 | 3.54 | Top 40% | Caucasian | 97.9% |
| 2007 | MD | 1830 | 3.20 | Bottom 50% | Caucasian | 83.7% |
| 2007 | NY | 1680 | 3.65 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 84.1% |
| 2007 | NY | 1410 | 2.80 | Top 30% | South Asian | 4.4% |
|
| 2012 | XX | 2010 | 3.76 | Top 10% | None Indicated | 99.2% |
| 2012 | NJ | 1980 | 3.60 | Top 20% | East Asian | 98.3% |
| 2012 | NY | 1820 | 2.70 | Bottom 50% | Caucasian | 52.9% |
| 2012 | PA | 1630 | 3.40 | Top 40% | Caucasian | 62.5% |
| 2011 | NY | 2360 | 3.80 | Bottom 40% | East Asian | 100.0% |
| 2011 | NY | 2200 | 3.35 | Class Not Ranked | East Asian | 99.5% |
| 2011 | NY | 2090 | 3.60 | Top 25% | Caucasian | 99.3% |
| 2011 | NY | 2080 | 3.52 | Unknown | South Asian | 99.1% |
| 2011 | NY | 2070 | 3.75 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 99.5% |
| 2011 | NY | 2050 | 3.92 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 99.7% |
| 2011 | VA | 2010 | 3.10 | Unknown | Caucasian | 96.7% |
| 2011 | MD | 1960 | 3.30 | Top 30% | Caucasian | 95.4% |
| 2011 | CA | 1890 | 2.80 | Unknown | Caucasian | 72.9% |
| 2011 | NY | 1770 | 3.00 | Bottom 30% | Caucasian | 63.4% |
| 2011 | NY | 1760 | 3.67 | Top 15% | Caucasian | 91.8% |
| 2011 | MA | 1740 | 3.20 | Top 30% | Caucasian | 70.5% |
| 2011 | NY | 1630 | 3.30 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 55.5% |
| 2011 | MD | 1450 | 3.30 | Bottom 40% | Caucasian | 21.3% |
| 2011 | MD | 1440 | 4.00 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 65.5% |
| 2011 | CA | 30 | 3.20 | Unknown | Caucasian | 96.0% |
| 2011 | MD | 26 | 3.52 | Top 40% | Caucasian | 89.9% |
| 2010 | NY | 2330 | 3.80 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 100.0% |
| 2010 | NY | 2330 | 4.00 | Top 3% | Caucasian | 100.0% |
| 2010 | NY | 2300 | 3.85 | Class Not Ranked | South Asian | 99.9% |
| 2010 | NY | 2300 | 3.86 | Top 2% | Caucasian | 99.9% |
| 2010 | NY | 2280 | 4.00 | Top 2% | Caucasian | 100.0% |
| 2010 | NY | 2260 | 3.50 | Class Not Ranked | East Asian | 99.8% |
| 2010 | NY | 2220 | 3.80 | Top 5% | East Asian | 99.9% |
| 2010 | NY | 2210 | 3.50 | Bottom 50% | None Indicated | 99.7% |
| 2010 | NY | 2200 | 3.00 | Unknown | Caucasian | 98.5% |
| 2010 | NY | 2190 | 3.66 | Top 10% | East Asian | 99.8% |
| 2010 | MA | 2190 | 3.68 | Top 15% | East Asian | 99.8% |
| 2010 | NY | 2160 | 3.40 | Class Not Ranked | South Asian | 99.3% |
| 2010 | NY | 2140 | 3.15 | Bottom 50% | East Asian | 99.0% |
| 2010 | NY | 2110 | 3.70 | Class Not Ranked | None Indicated | 99.6% |
| 2010 | NY | 2100 | 3.70 | Class Not Ranked | East Asian | 99.5% |
| 2010 | NY | 2080 | 3.97 | Top 10% | African-American | 99.8% |
| 2010 | CA | 2070 | 3.43 | Top 30% | East Asian | 98.7% |
| 2010 | NY | 2050 | 3.66 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 99.2% |
| 2010 | NY | 2050 | 3.84 | Top 1% | Caucasian | 99.5% |
| 2010 | NY | 2050 | 3.65 | Top 35% | East Asian | 99.2% |
| 2010 | NJ | 2040 | 4.00 | Top 1% | Caucasian | 99.7% |
| 2010 | NY | 2010 | 3.10 | Class Not Ranked | South Asian | 94.7% |
| 2010 | FL | 2000 | 3.80 | Top 40% | South Asian | 99.2% |
| 2010 | NY | 2000 | 3.68 | Top 10% | African-American | 98.9% |
| 2010 | XX | 1990 | 3.69 | Top 25% | East Asian | 98.8% |
| 2010 | NY | 1980 | 3.50 | Top 15% | Caucasian | 98.3% |
| 2010 | NY | 1980 | 3.52 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 97.9% |
| 2010 | NY | 1980 | 3.80 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 99.0% |
| 2010 | NY | 1980 | 3.00 | Class Not Ranked | East Asian | 91.2% |
| 2010 | (Private) | 1970 | 3.44 | Class Not Ranked | None Indicated | 97.2% |
| 2010 | NY | 1950 | 3.00 | Unknown | East Asian | 88.9% |
| 2010 | NY | 1950 | 3.72 | Top 10% | Other | 98.5% |
| 2010 | NY | 1950 | 3.00 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 88.9% |
| 2010 | (Private) | 1950 | 3.80 | Top 5% | Other | 98.8% |
| 2010 | NY | 1930 | 3.50 | Unknown | South Asian | 99.8% |
| 2010 | NY | 1930 | 3.72 | Class Not Ranked | East Asian | 98.2% |
| 2010 | NY | 1930 | 3.40 | Unknown | African-American | 95.5% |
| 2010 | CA | 1920 | 3.61 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 98.7% |
| 2010 | NY | 1920 | 3.72 | Unknown | None Indicated | 98.0% |
| 2010 | NJ | 1920 | 3.51 | Top 20% | East Asian | 96.4% |
| 2010 | NY | 1920 | 2.70 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 72.2% |
| 2010 | NY | 1920 | 2.80 | Unknown | Hispanic | 77.6% |
| 2010 | NY | 1920 | 3.69 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 97.9% |
| 2010 | NY | 1910 | 3.00 | Bottom 50% | Caucasian | 85.2% |
| 2010 | GA | 1910 | 3.60 | Top 40% | East Asian | 97.0% |
| 2010 | NJ | 1910 | 3.90 | Top 10% | Other | 98.7% |
| 2010 | NY | 1900 | 3.88 | Top 2% | Caucasian | 98.5% |
| 2010 | NY | 1900 | 3.67 | Top 15% | East Asian | 97.3% |
| 2010 | NY | 1900 | 3.60 | Top 15% | Hispanic | 96.7% |
| 2010 | NY | 1890 | 3.20 | Unknown | East Asian | 89.5% |
| 2010 | NY | 1890 | 3.90 | Top 15% | Caucasian | 98.5% |
| 2010 | NY | 1880 | 3.68 | Top 10% | East Asian | 96.9% |
| 2010 | NY | 1880 | 3.00 | Class Not Ranked | East Asian | 81.6% |
| 2010 | NY | 1880 | 4.00 | Unknown | East Asian | 98.8% |
| 2010 | XX | 1870 | 3.80 | Top 20% | East Asian | 97.6% |
| 2010 | NY | 1860 | 3.18 | Top 40% | Caucasian | 86.2% |
| 2010 | NY | 1860 | 2.70 | Unknown | African-American | 61.0% |
| 2010 | FL | 1840 | 3.80 | Top 10% | South Asian | 99.6% |
| 2010 | NY | 1840 | 2.80 | Class Not Ranked | Hispanic | 63.6% |
| 2010 | NY | 1790 | 3.80 | Top 10% | East Asian | 95.4% |
| 2010 | NJ | 1790 | 3.52 | Class Not Ranked | South Asian | 90.3% |
| 2010 | NJ | 1790 | 3.60 | Top 30% | East Asian | 92.2% |
| 2010 | NY | 1770 | 3.20 | Unknown | South Asian | 83.7% |
| 2010 | XX | 1770 | 3.60 | Top 40% | Hispanic | 90.8% |
| 2010 | XX | 1760 | 3.60 | Top 20% | East Asian | 90.1% |
| 2010 | NY | 1750 | 3.72 | Top 15% | East Asian | 92.1% |
| 2010 | VA | 1750 | 3.55 | Top 25% | Caucasian | 87.7% |
| 2010 | NY | 1750 | 3.72 | Top 10% | East Asian | 92.1% |
| 2010 | NY | 1750 | 3.00 | Class Not Ranked | East Asian | 59.2% |
| 2010 | NY | 1730 | 3.12 | Unknown | South Asian | 63.8% |
| 2010 | NY | 1710 | 3.40 | Top 30% | East Asian | 79.0% |
| 2010 | FL | 1710 | 2.70 | Top 40% | Caucasian | 30.4% |
| 2010 | NY | 1710 | 3.00 | Bottom 50% | Hispanic | 51.0% |
| 2010 | CA | 1700 | 3.50 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 83.4% |
| 2010 | FL | 1700 | 3.00 | Class Not Ranked | Hispanic | 49.1% |
| 2010 | NY | 1700 | 3.30 | Unknown | East Asian | 69.7% |
| 2010 | GA | 1690 | 3.23 | Top 30% | African-American | 79.3% |
| 2010 | NY | 1690 | 2.60 | Class Not Ranked | East Asian | 21.5% |
| 2010 | NY | 1690 | 3.70 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 86.8% |
| 2010 | NY | 1680 | 3.40 | Bottom 50% | Caucasian | 71.9% |
| 2010 | NY | 1680 | 3.80 | Top 4% | East Asian | 89.1% |
| 2010 | FL | 1680 | 3.38 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 70.8% |
| 2010 | NJ | 1680 | 3.65 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 84.1% |
| 2010 | NY | 1670 | 3.50 | Top 30% | East Asian | 76.0% |
| 2010 | CT | 1650 | 3.50 | Top 25% | Caucasian | 72.6% |
| 2010 | NJ | 1650 | 2.99 | Bottom 50% | Hispanic | 37.8% |
| 2010 | NY | 1650 | 3.00 | Top 25% | Caucasian | 38.5% |
| 2010 | NY | 1640 | 3.00 | Top 25% | None Indicated | 36.7% |
| 2010 | NJ | 1630 | 3.00 | Top 40% | South Asian | 74.2% |
| 2010 | CA | 1630 | 3.40 | Top 30% | Middle-Eastern | 62.5% |
| 2010 | NY | 1630 | 3.72 | Top 15% | Caucasian | 80.8% |
| 2010 | NY | 1620 | 3.48 | Unknown | East Asian | 66.0% |
| 2010 | NY | 1590 | 3.36 | Unknown | East Asian | 51.5% |
| 2010 | NY | 1580 | 3.00 | Top 20% | East Asian | 25.8% |
| 2010 | NY | 1580 | 3.00 | Unknown | African-American | 25.8% |
| 2010 | NY | 1570 | 3.64 | Unknown | East Asian | 66.7% |
| 2010 | FL | 1560 | 3.70 | Unknown | Caucasian | 68.8% |
| 2010 | NY | 1560 | 3.59 | Unknown | Hispanic | 61.6% |
| 2010 | NY | 1550 | 3.58 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 59.1% |
| 2010 | NY | 1540 | 3.30 | Unknown | African-American | 50.4% |
| 2010 | NY | 1530 | 3.52 | Unknown | South Asian | 50.4% |
| 2010 | NY | 1520 | 3.67 | Top 10% | Hispanic | 59.2% |
| 2010 | NY | 1430 | 3.80 | Top 2% | Caucasian | 49.6% |
| 2010 | NY | 1350 | 3.20 | Unknown | East Asian | 8.0% |
| 2010 | NY | 1260 | 3.00 | Unknown | Hispanic | 2.2% |
| 2010 | NY | 1180 | 3.30 | Bottom 40% | Caucasian | 80.5% |
| 2010 | PA | 1030 | 3.40 | Top 15% | Caucasian | 44.9% |
| 2010 | NE | 35 | 3.24 | Top 20% | East Asian | 99.8% |
| 2010 | (Private) | 34 | 3.76 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 99.9% |
| 2010 | NY | 32 | 3.96 | Top 3% | East Asian | 99.8% |
| 2010 | PA | 30 | 3.60 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 98.7% |
| 2010 | NY | 28 | 3.63 | Class Not Ranked | East Asian | 96.7% |
| 2010 | NY | 27 | 3.50 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 92.4% |
| 2010 | CA | 26 | 3.82 | Top 4% | Caucasian | 95.5% |
| 2010 | WA | 24 | 3.10 | Bottom 50% | Caucasian | 48.7% |
| 2009 | ME | 2400 | 4.00 | Top 1% | Caucasian | 100.0% |
| 2009 | NJ | 2310 | 3.80 | Top 5% | East Asian | 99.9% |
| 2009 | NY | 2310 | 4.00 | Unknown | Caucasian | 100.0% |
| 2009 | NY | 2240 | 3.80 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 99.9% |
| 2009 | PA | 2220 | 3.77 | Top 10% | East Asian | 99.9% |
| 2009 | NY | 2220 | 3.90 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 99.9% |
| 2009 | NY | 2210 | 4.00 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 99.9% |
| 2009 | NJ | 2200 | 3.90 | Class Not Ranked | East Asian | 99.9% |
| 2009 | NY | 2170 | 3.56 | Unknown | South Asian | 99.6% |
| 2009 | XX | 2130 | 2.70 | Unknown | East Asian | 93.9% |
| 2009 | NY | 2130 | 3.70 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 99.6% |
| 2009 | NY | 2120 | 3.74 | Class Not Ranked | East Asian | 99.7% |
| 2009 | NY | 2100 | 4.00 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 99.8% |
| 2009 | NY | 2090 | 3.70 | Class Not Ranked | East Asian | 99.5% |
| 2009 | NY | 2070 | 3.50 | Top 30% | East Asian | 98.9% |
| 2009 | NY | 2060 | 3.80 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 99.5% |
| 2009 | NY | 2050 | 3.70 | Unknown | South Asian | 99.3% |
| 2009 | FL | 2030 | 3.50 | Unknown | African-American | 98.5% |
| 2009 | NY | 2020 | 3.70 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 99.1% |
| 2009 | XX | 2020 | 3.40 | Top 10% | South Asian | 97.9% |
| 2009 | NJ | 2010 | 3.40 | Unknown | East Asian | 97.7% |
| 2009 | NY | 2010 | 3.18 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 95.7% |
| 2009 | NY | 2010 | 3.68 | Class Not Ranked | East Asian | 99.0% |
| 2009 | NY | 2000 | 2.50 | Unknown | South Asian | 74.4% |
| 2009 | NY | 1980 | 3.47 | Class Not Ranked | Hispanic | 97.6% |
| 2009 | NY | 1980 | 4.00 | Top 5% | South Asian | 99.5% |
| 2009 | NJ | 1980 | 3.50 | Top 40% | Other | 97.8% |
| 2009 | XX | 1960 | 3.56 | Class Not Ranked | None Indicated | 97.8% |
| 2009 | MI | 1950 | 3.50 | Valedictorian | Caucasian | 97.1% |
| 2009 | NY | 1950 | 3.70 | Top 10% | South Asian | 98.4% |
| 2009 | NY | 1940 | 3.90 | Top 5% | East Asian | 99.1% |
| 2009 | XX | 1940 | 3.44 | Unknown | East Asian | 96.4% |
| 2009 | NY | 1930 | 3.63 | Unknown | Caucasian | 97.6% |
| 2009 | NY | 1920 | 2.90 | Class Not Ranked | South Asian | 82.3% |
| 2009 | NY | 1910 | 3.70 | Unknown | Hispanic | 97.8% |
| 2009 | NY | 1900 | 3.70 | Unknown | Caucasian | 99.6% |
| 2009 | NY | 1900 | 3.94 | Top 5% | South Asian | 98.7% |
| 2009 | (Private) | 1900 | 3.70 | Top 10% | East Asian | 97.5% |
| 2009 | NY | 1890 | 3.00 | Unknown | Hispanic | 82.8% |
| 2009 | CA | 1890 | 3.30 | Unknown | Other | 92.0% |
| 2009 | NY | 1880 | 3.91 | Salutatorian | Hispanic | 98.4% |
| 2009 | NY | 1870 | 3.00 | Class Not Ranked | Middle-Eastern | 80.1% |
| 2009 | NY | 1870 | 3.90 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 98.2% |
| 2009 | NY | 1870 | 3.50 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 94.5% |
| 2009 | NY | 1860 | 3.00 | Class Not Ranked | African-American | 78.8% |
| 2009 | NJ | 1860 | 3.40 | Class Not Ranked | South Asian | 92.2% |
| 2009 | NY | 1850 | 2.70 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 59.1% |
| 2009 | NY | 1850 | 3.47 | Class Not Ranked | East Asian | 93.1% |
| 2009 | NY | 1820 | 3.00 | Unknown | South Asian | 72.8% |
| 2009 | NY | 1820 | 3.00 | Class Not Ranked | South Asian | 72.8% |
| 2009 | NY | 1820 | 3.70 | Top 5% | South Asian | 95.3% |
| 2009 | NY | 1820 | 3.50 | Unknown | Caucasian | 91.9% |
| 2009 | NY | 1810 | 3.68 | Top 10% | East Asian | 94.5% |
| 2009 | NY | 1800 | 3.75 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 95.1% |
| 2009 | NY | 1800 | 3.20 | Unknown | Other | 79.9% |
| 2009 | NJ | 1800 | 3.20 | Top 10% | South Asian | 79.9% |
| 2009 | NY | 1790 | 2.30 | Bottom 40% | African-American | 21.5% |
| 2009 | NY | 1790 | 2.50 | Bottom 40% | South Asian | 32.8% |
| 2009 | NY | 1780 | 3.20 | Class Not Ranked | African-American | 76.9% |
| 2009 | OR | 1780 | 3.10 | Unknown | Caucasian | 71.4% |
| 2009 | NY | 1770 | 3.50 | Unknown | East Asian | 88.0% |
| 2009 | CA | 1760 | 3.05 | Unknown | East Asian | 76.9% |
| 2009 | NC | 1760 | 3.50 | Unknown | Caucasian | 89.3% |
| 2009 | NY | 1750 | 3.80 | Top 10% | East Asian | 99.3% |
| 2009 | NY | 1750 | 3.25 | Class Not Ranked | Hispanic | 74.9% |
| 2009 | NY | 1740 | 3.30 | Top 20% | East Asian | 76.2% |
| 2009 | NY | 1740 | 3.30 | Unknown | South Asian | 76.2% |
| 2009 | XX | 1710 | 3.30 | Top 40% | East Asian | 71.2% |
| 2009 | NY | 1700 | 3.50 | Top 20% | Hispanic | 80.4% |
| 2009 | NY | 1690 | 3.70 | Top 20% | Hispanic | 86.8% |
| 2009 | NY | 1690 | 3.30 | Top 30% | Caucasian | 67.5% |
| 2009 | NJ | 1680 | 3.88 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 91.1% |
| 2009 | MA | 1650 | 3.80 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 86.3% |
| 2009 | AK | 1650 | 4.00 | Top 10% | Hispanic | 91.9% |
| 2009 | NY | 1640 | 3.20 | Top 40% | Caucasian | 50.8% |
| 2009 | NY | 1630 | 3.50 | Class Not Ranked | Hispanic | 69.0% |
| 2009 | NY | 1610 | 3.00 | Top 30% | East Asian | 31.0% |
| 2009 | NY | 1600 | 3.87 | Top 20% | Middle-Eastern | 83.4% |
| 2009 | AR | 1580 | 3.96 | Top 20% | East Asian | 84.8% |
| 2009 | NY | 1580 | 3.30 | Top 10% | Hispanic | 45.3% |
| 2009 | NY | 1580 | 3.60 | Top 30% | African-American | 66.4% |
| 2009 | NY | 1570 | 3.00 | Bottom 50% | South Asian | 29.9% |
| 2009 | NY | 1520 | 3.70 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 61.3% |
| 2009 | NJ | 1520 | 2.70 | Class Not Ranked | Middle-Eastern | 8.1% |
| 2009 | NY | 1500 | 3.03 | Bottom 40% | East Asian | 16.0% |
| 2009 | WA | 1490 | 3.10 | Bottom 50% | Caucasian | 25.5% |
| 2009 | NY | 1420 | 3.00 | Unknown | African-American | 8.1% |
| 2009 | NY | 1400 | 3.30 | Bottom 40% | East Asian | 15.2% |
| 2009 | NY | 1370 | 3.76 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 34.5% |
| 2009 | XX | 1370 | 3.70 | Class Not Ranked | None Indicated | 99.3% |
| 2009 | NY | 34 | 3.90 | Top 1% | Caucasian | 99.9% |
| 2009 | CA | 31 | 3.40 | Top 40% | None Indicated | 98.6% |
| 2009 | PA | 28 | 3.25 | Top 40% | Other | 90.8% |
| 2009 | NY | 26 | 3.65 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 92.8% |
| 2009 | IL | 24 | 3.50 | Top 20% | South Asian | 75.1% |
| 2009 | DC | 18 | 3.30 | Top 40% | East Asian | 7.4% |
| 2008 | XX | 2400 | 4.00 | Top 1% | East Asian | 100.0% |
| 2008 | (Private) | 2270 | 3.80 | Unknown | Caucasian | 99.9% |
| 2008 | NY | 2180 | 3.97 | Top 10% | South Asian | 99.9% |
| 2008 | NY | 2130 | 3.60 | Unknown | Caucasian | 99.5% |
| 2008 | NY | 2090 | 3.70 | Top 10% | East Asian | 99.5% |
| 2008 | NY | 2080 | 3.70 | Top 10% | East Asian | 99.5% |
| 2008 | NY | 1990 | 3.40 | Unknown | East Asian | 97.3% |
| 2008 | NY | 1950 | 3.90 | Top 1% | East Asian | 99.1% |
| 2008 | NY | 1940 | 3.94 | Unknown | South Asian | 99.7% |
| 2008 | NY | 1940 | 2.80 | Unknown | East Asian | 80.6% |
| 2008 | NY | 1920 | 3.70 | Top 30% | Caucasian | 97.9% |
| 2008 | NY | 1860 | 3.75 | Top 5% | South Asian | 97.0% |
| 2008 | XX | 1840 | 3.00 | Class Not Ranked | East Asian | 75.7% |
| 2008 | NY | 1830 | 3.50 | Top 10% | East Asian | 92.4% |
| 2008 | XX | 1830 | 3.80 | Top 5% | South Asian | 96.7% |
| 2008 | XX | 1820 | 3.71 | Unknown | Other | 95.4% |
| 2008 | NY | 1800 | 3.20 | Top 20% | African-American | 79.9% |
| 2008 | NY | 1770 | 3.40 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 84.6% |
| 2008 | NY | 1770 | 3.50 | Top 20% | East Asian | 88.0% |
| 2008 | NY | 1760 | 3.80 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 94.2% |
| 2008 | NY | 1720 | 3.20 | Bottom 50% | Caucasian | 66.7% |
| 2008 | NY | 1700 | 3.70 | Top 10% | East Asian | 88.0% |
| 2008 | NJ | 1680 | 3.74 | Unknown | East Asian | 87.3% |
| 2008 | XX | 1660 | 3.20 | Unknown | Caucasian | 54.6% |
| 2008 | NY | 1200 | 2.30 | Bottom 50% | Caucasian | 0.2% |
| 2008 | NY | 1140 | 2.70 | Unknown | Caucasian | 30.4% |
| 2008 | NY | 32 | 3.85 | Top 1% | Other | 99.8% |
| 2008 | NY | 27 | 3.70 | Top 10% | East Asian | 95.6% |
| 2008 | (Private) | 27 | 3.15 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 81.6% |
| 2007 | NJ | 2350 | 3.85 | Top 5% | South Asian | 100.0% |
| 2007 | NY | 2320 | 4.00 | Unknown | Caucasian | 100.0% |
| 2007 | NY | 2190 | 3.90 | Unknown | Other | 99.9% |
| 2007 | CA | 1880 | 3.67 | Unknown | Other | 96.9% |
| 2007 | NY | 1830 | 3.40 | Top 5% | None Indicated | 90.2% |
| 2007 | NY | 1200 | 3.70 | Unknown | East Asian | 94.4% |
| 2004 | NY | 1200 | 3.50 | Unknown | Caucasian | 90.5% |
| |