Stony Brook University Applications and Decisions
Below is a list of applicants who have demonstrated interest in Stony Brook University. Our best formula
for this college is based on
84 members who were accepted or rejected. The formula
has a college admissions prediction accuracy of
94%?.
Because not all members have filled out the most recent version of our survey, some predictions are made based on
less-accurate models. Those are noted with an asterisk (*) next to their prediction.
This is a very popular school, so we're only showing you profiles that have received an admissions decision. If you
want to see all applicants to this school,
click here (caution: the page will take awhile to load).
|
| 2009 | (Private) | 2110 | 3.00 | Class Not Ranked | Hispanic | 96.9% |
| 2009 | NY | 2060 | 3.25 | Class Not Ranked | Middle-Eastern | 97.7% |
| 2009 | NY | 2040 | 3.40 | Unknown | South Asian | 98.2% |
| 2009 | NJ | 1930 | 3.30 | Top 20% | South Asian | 94.1% |
| 2009 | NY | 1800 | 3.90 | Top 1% | East Asian | 98.5% |
| 2009 | NY | 28 | 3.00 | Top 40% | Other | 82.8% |
| 2008 | MA | 1630 | 3.60 | Unknown | East Asian | 74.8% |
| 2008 | NY | 1500 | 3.00 | Unknown | Hispanic | 20.4% |
|
| 2009 | (Private) | 2340 | 4.00 | Top 1% | None Indicated | 100.0% |
| 2009 | NY | 2280 | 4.00 | Salutatorian | East Asian | 100.0% |
| 2009 | NY | 2150 | 3.48 | Class Not Ranked | Middle-Eastern | 99.4% |
| 2009 | NY | 2150 | 3.93 | Top 10% | South Asian | 99.8% |
| 2009 | CA | 2120 | 3.50 | Unknown | South Asian | 99.3% |
| 2009 | NY | 2110 | 3.70 | Class Not Ranked | East Asian | 99.6% |
| 2009 | NY | 2110 | 3.80 | Class Not Ranked | East Asian | 99.7% |
| 2009 | NY | 2110 | 3.70 | Top 5% | Hispanic | 99.6% |
| 2009 | NY | 2110 | 3.60 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 99.4% |
| 2009 | NY | 2090 | 3.44 | Class Not Ranked | Middle-Eastern | 99.0% |
| 2009 | NJ | 2090 | 3.50 | Top 20% | Middle-Eastern | 99.1% |
| 2009 | NY | 2070 | 3.87 | Class Not Ranked | East Asian | 99.6% |
| 2009 | NY | 2070 | 3.85 | Top 20% | East Asian | 99.6% |
| 2009 | NY | 2060 | 3.70 | Class Not Ranked | South Asian | 99.4% |
| 2009 | NY | 2010 | 3.75 | Top 1% | Hispanic | 99.1% |
| 2009 | NY | 2010 | 3.70 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 99.0% |
| 2009 | MA | 2000 | 3.48 | Top 20% | Other | 98.0% |
| 2009 | CA | 1970 | 3.20 | Unknown | Caucasian | 94.5% |
| 2009 | NY | 1970 | 3.60 | Top 10% | Hispanic | 98.2% |
| 2009 | NY | 1960 | 3.70 | Top 10% | African-American | 98.5% |
| 2009 | NY | 1950 | 3.24 | Class Not Ranked | Middle-Eastern | 94.1% |
| 2009 | NY | 1940 | 4.00 | Top 10% | None Indicated | 99.8% |
| 2009 | NY | 1910 | 3.60 | Class Not Ranked | East Asian | 97.0% |
| 2009 | NY | 1870 | 4.00 | Top 10% | African-American | 98.6% |
| 2009 | NY | 1860 | 3.60 | Top 20% | Other | 95.5% |
| 2009 | NY | 1840 | 3.65 | Top 20% | East Asian | 95.3% |
| 2009 | NY | 1830 | 3.90 | Top 20% | None Indicated | 97.5% |
| 2009 | NY | 1820 | 3.50 | Top 20% | South Asian | 92.4% |
| 2009 | NY | 1820 | 3.55 | Top 10% | East Asian | 92.9% |
| 2009 | NY | 1810 | 3.85 | Top 1% | Hispanic | 96.6% |
| 2009 | NY | 1800 | 3.75 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 95.1% |
| 2009 | NY | 1790 | 4.00 | Top 1% | East Asian | 97.4% |
| 2009 | NY | 1780 | 3.80 | Top 10% | Middle-Eastern | 95.0% |
| 2009 | NY | 1780 | 3.80 | Top 20% | East Asian | 95.0% |
| 2009 | NY | 28 | 3.60 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 96.5% |
| 2009 | NY | 26 | 3.76 | Top 1% | South Asian | 94.7% |
| 2008 | CT | 2370 | 3.98 | Top 1% | Caucasian | 100.0% |
| 2008 | NY | 2340 | 4.00 | Salutatorian | Caucasian | 100.0% |
| 2008 | (Private) | 2310 | 4.00 | Top 1% | Caucasian | 100.0% |
| 2008 | NY | 2290 | 4.00 | Valedictorian | None Indicated | 100.0% |
| 2008 | NY | 2290 | 3.96 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 100.0% |
| 2008 | NY | 2220 | 3.75 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 99.9% |
| 2008 | NY | 2190 | 4.00 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 99.9% |
| 2008 | NY | 2140 | 3.80 | Top 5% | South Asian | 99.8% |
| 2008 | NH | 2130 | 3.20 | Top 40% | Hispanic | 98.5% |
| 2008 | NJ | 2100 | 3.20 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 98.1% |
| 2008 | NY | 2060 | 3.70 | Unknown | Middle-Eastern | 99.4% |
| 2008 | NY | 2040 | 3.80 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 99.7% |
| 2008 | NY | 2000 | 3.65 | Top 20% | None Indicated | 98.8% |
| 2008 | CT | 2000 | 4.00 | Valedictorian | East Asian | 99.6% |
| 2008 | NY | 1990 | 3.20 | Top 20% | South Asian | 95.2% |
| 2008 | NY | 1950 | 3.70 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 98.4% |
| 2008 | NY | 1820 | 3.30 | Top 30% | Caucasian | 86.4% |
| 2008 | NY | 1800 | 3.70 | Unknown | None Indicated | 99.6% |
| 2008 | NY | 1770 | 4.00 | Unknown | Hispanic | 98.1% |
| 2008 | NY | 1730 | 3.50 | Class Not Ranked | African-American | 84.1% |
| 2008 | NY | 1720 | 3.75 | Top 5% | Hispanic | 90.8% |
| 2008 | XX | 1540 | 3.97 | Top 10% | East Asian | 80.1% |
| 2008 | NY | 32 | 3.70 | Unknown | None Indicated | 99.6% |
| 2008 | NY | 32 | 3.60 | Top 10% | Hispanic | 99.5% |
| 2008 | (Private) | 30 | 3.56 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 98.5% |
| 2007 | NY | 2070 | 3.90 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 99.7% |
| 2007 | NY | 1910 | 3.75 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 98.0% |
| 2007 | NY | 1670 | 3.97 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 92.5% |
| 2006 | NY | 2180 | 3.87 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 99.9% |
|
|
|
| 2009 | NY | 1630 | 3.30 | Top 40% | None Indicated | 55.5% |
| 2009 | NY | 1560 | 3.50 | Top 5% | South Asian | 55.3% |
| 2009 | NY | 1550 | 3.00 | Unknown | South Asian | 21.2% |
| 2009 | NY | 1310 | 3.40 | Top 10% | Hispanic | 10.0% |
| 2009 | NY | 1290 | 3.48 | Top 40% | African-American | 10.5% |
| 2008 | NY | 1650 | 2.70 | Top 40% | Caucasian | 20.8% |
| 2008 | FL | 1600 | 3.85 | Top 5% | African-American | 82.6% |
| 2008 | XX | 26 | 2.90 | Bottom 40% | Caucasian | 59.6% |
| |