Binghamton University Applications and Decisions
Below is a list of applicants who have demonstrated interest in Binghamton University. Our best formula
for this college is based on
126 members who were accepted or rejected. The formula
has a college admissions prediction accuracy of
87%?.
Because not all members have filled out the most recent version of our survey, some predictions are made based on
less-accurate models. Those are noted with an asterisk (*) next to their prediction.
This is a very popular school, and you're looking at the whole list. If you
would like to only see completed applications,
click here for a smaller version of this page.
|
| 2009 | NY | 2070 | 3.19 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 74.2% |
| 2009 | NY | 2020 | 3.00 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 52.7% |
| 2009 | NY | 1950 | 3.24 | Class Not Ranked | Middle-Eastern | 51.7% |
| 2009 | NJ | 1930 | 3.10 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 91.5% |
| 2009 | NY | 1290 | 3.48 | Top 40% | African-American | 36.2% |
| 2009 | NY | 29 | 3.75 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 80.9% |
| 2008 | RI | 1930 | 3.00 | Unknown | Caucasian | 89.3% |
|
| 2010 | (Private) | 2270 | 3.92 | Top 2% | Caucasian | 99.9% |
| 2010 | NH | 2070 | 3.73 | Top 10% | South Asian | 99.4% |
| 2010 | (Private) | 2050 | 3.90 | Top 1% | Caucasian | 91.3% |
| 2010 | XX | 1990 | 3.91 | Salutatorian | East Asian | 99.1% |
| 2010 | PA | 1990 | 4.00 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 99.3% |
| 2010 | MA | 1910 | 3.40 | Top 40% | East Asian | 96.9% |
| 2010 | NJ | 1900 | 3.71 | Class Not Ranked | East Asian | 97.4% |
| 2010 | CT | 1880 | 3.89 | Top 15% | South Asian | 98.0% |
| 2010 | MA | 1810 | 3.40 | Class Not Ranked | East Asian | 88.2% |
| 2009 | NY | 2300 | 3.84 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 99.2% |
| 2009 | NY | 2290 | 3.76 | Class Not Ranked | East Asian | 98.9% |
| 2009 | NY | 2250 | 3.50 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 97.1% |
| 2009 | NY | 2250 | 3.80 | Class Not Ranked | South Asian | 98.6% |
| 2009 | NY | 2230 | 3.90 | Valedictorian | None Indicated | 98.2% |
| 2009 | NY | 2200 | 3.50 | Top 30% | Caucasian | 98.1% |
| 2009 | NY | 2200 | 3.41 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 93.7% |
| 2009 | (Private) | 2200 | 3.30 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 99.5% |
| 2009 | XX | 2190 | 3.71 | Class Not Ranked | Other | 99.8% |
| 2009 | NY | 2170 | 4.00 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 97.8% |
| 2009 | NY | 2150 | 3.48 | Class Not Ranked | Middle-Eastern | 92.6% |
| 2009 | NY | 2140 | 3.54 | Top 20% | Other | 93.5% |
| 2009 | NJ | 2130 | 3.46 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 99.4% |
| 2009 | NY | 2110 | 3.70 | Class Not Ranked | East Asian | 94.7% |
| 2009 | NY | 2110 | 3.96 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 96.9% |
| 2009 | NY | 2110 | 3.52 | Unknown | African-American | 99.9% |
| 2009 | NY | 2110 | 3.80 | Class Not Ranked | East Asian | 95.0% |
| 2009 | NY | 2110 | 3.70 | Top 5% | Hispanic | 99.9% |
| 2009 | NY | 2110 | 3.60 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 91.2% |
| 2009 | NY | 2080 | 3.99 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 95.0% |
| 2009 | NY | 2070 | 3.87 | Class Not Ranked | East Asian | 94.0% |
| 2009 | NY | 2070 | 3.40 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 82.9% |
| 2009 | (Private) | 2070 | 3.70 | Top 5% | South Asian | 89.4% |
| 2009 | NY | 2070 | 3.85 | Top 20% | East Asian | 94.3% |
| 2009 | NY | 2060 | 3.70 | Class Not Ranked | South Asian | 90.4% |
| 2009 | NY | 2060 | 3.25 | Class Not Ranked | Middle-Eastern | 75.4% |
| 2009 | NY | 2050 | 3.84 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 92.3% |
| 2009 | NJ | 2050 | 3.60 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 99.1% |
| 2009 | NY | 2010 | 3.90 | Top 5% | Other | 88.8% |
| 2009 | NY | 2010 | 3.80 | Top 10% | Hispanic | 99.8% |
| 2009 | RI | 1990 | 3.60 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 98.5% |
| 2009 | XX | 1980 | 3.95 | Top 1% | East Asian | 99.1% |
| 2009 | NY | 1970 | 3.60 | Top 10% | Hispanic | 99.6% |
| 2009 | NY | 1960 | 3.70 | Top 10% | African-American | 99.6% |
| 2009 | NY | 1960 | 3.80 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 79.4% |
| 2009 | NY | 1950 | 3.84 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 87.2% |
| 2009 | NY | 1940 | 4.00 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 97.4% |
| 2009 | NY | 1940 | 4.00 | Top 10% | None Indicated | 97.2% |
| 2009 | MA | 1940 | 3.27 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 95.2% |
| 2009 | NY | 1930 | 3.90 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 80.6% |
| 2009 | NY | 1920 | 3.80 | Unknown | East Asian | 76.6% |
| 2009 | NJ | 1920 | 3.60 | Class Not Ranked | Other | 97.2% |
| 2009 | CT | 1910 | 3.20 | Unknown | African-American | 99.9% |
| 2009 | NY | 1900 | 3.84 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 73.0% |
| 2009 | NY | 1870 | 4.00 | Top 10% | African-American | 99.6% |
| 2009 | NY | 1860 | 3.40 | Unknown | Caucasian | 40.9% |
| 2009 | NY | 1810 | 3.85 | Top 1% | Hispanic | 98.8% |
| 2009 | CT | 1810 | 3.57 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 91.2% |
| 2009 | NY | 1800 | 3.90 | Top 1% | East Asian | 70.7% |
| 2009 | CT | 1790 | 3.00 | Top 30% | South Asian | 75.8% |
| 2009 | MA | 1780 | 3.05 | Class Not Ranked | African-American | 99.5% |
| 2009 | NY | 1780 | 3.80 | Top 20% | East Asian | 49.5% |
| 2009 | XX | 1710 | 3.30 | Top 40% | East Asian | 79.3% |
| 2009 | NJ | 1450 | 3.30 | Top 40% | Middle-Eastern | 59.1% |
| 2009 | NY | 1290 | 3.50 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 64.0% |
| 2009 | NY | 32 | 3.82 | Top 20% | African-American | 100.0% |
| 2009 | MO | 29 | 3.78 | Top 10% | African-American | 100.0% |
| 2009 | NY | 29 | 3.70 | Unknown | Caucasian | 77.1% |
| 2009 | FL | 27 | 3.35 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 87.8% |
| 2008 | NY | 2280 | 4.00 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 99.3% |
| 2008 | NY | 2190 | 4.00 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 98.2% |
| 2008 | NY | 2160 | 3.90 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 97.7% |
| 2008 | NY | 2140 | 3.80 | Top 5% | South Asian | 95.3% |
| 2008 | NY | 2130 | 3.89 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 99.0% |
| 2008 | (Private) | 2120 | 3.94 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 99.8% |
| 2008 | NJ | 2110 | 3.87 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 99.7% |
| 2008 | NY | 2080 | 3.30 | Class Not Ranked | South Asian | 80.4% |
| 2008 | NJ | 2060 | 3.81 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 99.5% |
| 2008 | NY | 2060 | 3.70 | Unknown | Middle-Eastern | 90.4% |
| 2008 | NY | 2050 | 3.50 | Unknown | African-American | 99.8% |
| 2008 | NY | 2040 | 3.80 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 95.4% |
| 2008 | NY | 2000 | 3.65 | Top 20% | None Indicated | 84.1% |
| 2008 | NY | 2000 | 3.50 | Top 20% | Hispanic | 99.7% |
| 2008 | NY | 1960 | 3.80 | Top 5% | East Asian | 79.4% |
| 2008 | NY | 1920 | 3.63 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 66.0% |
| 2008 | NY | 1910 | 3.80 | Top 20% | East Asian | 76.9% |
| 2008 | NY | 1890 | 3.80 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 86.1% |
| 2008 | TX | 1880 | 3.55 | Top 40% | Caucasian | 97.2% |
| 2008 | NY | 1770 | 4.00 | Unknown | Hispanic | 99.5% |
| 2008 | NY | 1680 | 3.89 | Top 30% | None Indicated | 37.5% |
| 2008 | FL | 1600 | 3.85 | Top 5% | African-American | 99.5% |
| 2008 | XX | 1540 | 3.97 | Top 10% | East Asian | 69.6% |
| 2008 | NY | 32 | 3.60 | Top 10% | Hispanic | 99.9% |
| 2008 | NY | 31 | 3.64 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 89.8% |
| 2008 | NY | 29 | 3.70 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 75.3% |
| 2008 | NY | 27 | 3.75 | Top 5% | African-American | 98.8% |
| 2007 | (Private) | 2400 | 3.70 | Unknown | Caucasian | 99.5% |
| 2007 | NY | 2270 | 3.75 | Unknown | Caucasian | 98.7% |
| 2007 | NY | 2210 | 3.57 | Unknown | Caucasian | 96.5% |
| 2007 | NY | 2060 | 3.00 | Unknown | Caucasian | 64.1% |
| 2007 | (Private) | 1900 | 3.83 | Unknown | Caucasian | 74.4% |
| 2006 | NY | 2180 | 4.00 | Top 1% | Caucasian | 97.9% |
| 2002 | NY | 2400 | 4.00 | Valedictorian | Caucasian | 99.7% |
|
| 2009 | NY | 1960 | 3.20 | Top 40% | Caucasian | 63.4% |
| 2009 | NY | 1950 | 3.60 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 72.4% |
| 2009 | NY | 1030 | 3.40 | Unknown | Hispanic | 2.4% |
| 2008 | NY | 1800 | 3.80 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 49.4% |
| 2008 | NY | 1620 | 3.90 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 17.6% |
| 2008 | NY | 1550 | 3.50 | Top 30% | Caucasian | 37.4% |
| 2008 | NY | 29 | 3.95 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 85.1% |
|
|
| 2009 | NY | 2270 | 3.92 | Top 2% | Caucasian | 98.9% |
| 2009 | (Private) | 2090 | 3.70 | Class Not Ranked | East Asian | 92.6% |
| 2009 | NY | 2040 | 3.50 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 81.0% |
| 2009 | NY | 2040 | 3.50 | Unknown | Caucasian | 82.5% |
| 2009 | NY | 2000 | 3.80 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 86.3% |
| 2009 | NY | 1930 | 3.40 | Top 30% | East Asian | 63.9% |
| 2009 | NY | 1910 | 3.60 | Class Not Ranked | East Asian | 64.7% |
| 2009 | NY | 1860 | 3.40 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 40.9% |
| 2009 | NY | 1790 | 4.00 | Top 1% | East Asian | 55.2% |
| 2009 | NY | 1630 | 2.99 | Top 40% | Caucasian | 4.6% |
| 2009 | NJ | 1620 | 3.55 | Top 10% | South Asian | 62.9% |
| 2009 | NY | 1600 | 3.47 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 7.5% |
| 2009 | NY | 1560 | 3.50 | Top 5% | South Asian | 4.3% |
| 2009 | NY | 1550 | 3.00 | Unknown | South Asian | 1.4% |
| 2009 | (Private) | 1450 | 3.30 | Top 30% | Caucasian | 1.6% |
| 2009 | CT | 1420 | 2.77 | Top 30% | Caucasian | 5.3% |
| 2009 | NY | 1320 | 2.89 | Top 20% | Native American | 14.8% |
| 2009 | NY | 1310 | 3.40 | Top 20% | Hispanic | 27.4% |
| 2009 | NY | 1310 | 3.40 | Top 10% | Hispanic | 23.6% |
| 2009 | NY | 28 | 3.60 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 62.5% |
| 2008 | NJ | 1630 | 3.08 | Bottom 40% | Caucasian | 60.8% |
| 2007 | NY | 2260 | 3.63 | Unknown | East Asian | 98.0% |
|
| 2012 | IL | 2100 | 3.70 | Top 15% | Hispanic | 100.0% |
| 2011 | NJ | 1700 | 2.74 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 34.4% |
| 2010 | (Private) | 2270 | 4.00 | Top 1% | Caucasian | 99.1% |
| 2010 | NY | 2270 | 3.64 | Class Not Ranked | South Asian | 98.3% |
| 2010 | IN | 2260 | 3.20 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 99.7% |
| 2010 | NY | 2250 | 3.85 | Class Not Ranked | East Asian | 99.5% |
| 2010 | NY | 2210 | 4.00 | Top 10% | Hispanic | 100.0% |
| 2010 | (Private) | 2200 | 3.85 | Top 10% | East Asian | 97.8% |
| 2010 | NY | 2180 | 4.00 | Top 2% | East Asian | 97.9% |
| 2010 | NY | 2180 | 3.90 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 97.9% |
| 2010 | NY | 2170 | 3.80 | Top 5% | Hispanic | 100.0% |
| 2010 | NY | 2160 | 3.90 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 97.2% |
| 2010 | NY | 2150 | 3.84 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 98.6% |
| 2010 | (Private) | 2150 | 4.00 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 97.7% |
| 2010 | (Private) | 2110 | 3.65 | Top 30% | African-American | 99.9% |
| 2010 | NY | 2110 | 3.66 | Class Not Ranked | Hispanic | 99.9% |
| 2010 | NY | 2110 | 3.60 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 92.0% |
| 2010 | NY | 2090 | 3.37 | Unknown | East Asian | 88.7% |
| 2010 | NJ | 2090 | 3.40 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 99.3% |
| 2010 | NY | 2090 | 3.60 | Class Not Ranked | East Asian | 90.7% |
| 2010 | NY | 2070 | 4.00 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 97.2% |
| 2010 | NY | 2070 | 4.00 | Unknown | East Asian | 95.6% |
| 2010 | NY | 2070 | 3.80 | Top 10% | Hispanic | 99.9% |
| 2010 | NY | 2050 | 3.61 | Class Not Ranked | African-American | 99.8% |
| 2010 | NY | 2040 | 3.52 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 92.0% |
| 2010 | NY | 2030 | 3.40 | Unknown | East Asian | 89.4% |
| 2010 | NY | 2030 | 3.90 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 91.4% |
| 2010 | NY | 2030 | 3.80 | Top 1% | Caucasian | 87.4% |
| 2010 | NY | 2030 | 3.67 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 84.5% |
| 2010 | NY | 2010 | 3.40 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 82.9% |
| 2010 | NY | 2010 | 4.00 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 91.9% |
| 2010 | MD | 2000 | 3.30 | Class Not Ranked | South Asian | 97.4% |
| 2010 | NY | 2000 | 4.00 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 91.2% |
| 2010 | NY | 2000 | 4.00 | Top 5% | African-American | 99.9% |
| 2010 | NY | 1990 | 3.53 | Unknown | East Asian | 76.0% |
| 2010 | NY | 1990 | 3.79 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 84.6% |
| 2010 | NY | 1980 | 3.60 | Class Not Ranked | East Asian | 82.1% |
| 2010 | NY | 1980 | 3.60 | Top 15% | Caucasian | 77.6% |
| 2010 | NY | 1980 | 4.00 | Top 3% | Caucasian | 88.1% |
| 2010 | NY | 1970 | 3.68 | Top 15% | Caucasian | 79.6% |
| 2010 | NY | 1960 | 3.86 | Top 15% | Caucasian | 89.8% |
| 2010 | NY | 1950 | 3.64 | Class Not Ranked | East Asian | 74.4% |
| 2010 | NY | 1940 | 3.65 | Top 20% | South Asian | 85.2% |
| 2010 | NY | 1940 | 3.68 | Top 15% | Caucasian | 74.7% |
| 2010 | (Private) | 1940 | 3.60 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 97.7% |
| 2010 | NY | 1930 | 3.30 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 50.5% |
| 2010 | NY | 1920 | 3.60 | Top 20% | Other | 68.7% |
| 2010 | NY | 1910 | 3.40 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 50.1% |
| 2010 | NY | 1890 | 3.30 | Top 40% | Caucasian | 54.0% |
| 2010 | NY | 1890 | 2.70 | Unknown | Caucasian | 13.7% |
| 2010 | NY | 1890 | 3.53 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 53.4% |
| 2010 | NY | 1880 | 3.60 | Class Not Ranked | Hispanic | 99.1% |
| 2010 | NY | 1880 | 3.68 | Top 10% | East Asian | 60.5% |
| 2010 | PA | 1880 | 2.98 | Unknown | South Asian | 83.6% |
| 2010 | NY | 1870 | 3.70 | Top 30% | South Asian | 68.3% |
| 2010 | PA | 1860 | 3.30 | Bottom 50% | East Asian | 94.9% |
| 2010 | NY | 1860 | 3.90 | Top 20% | East Asian | 72.7% |
| 2010 | NY | 1850 | 3.30 | Top 40% | Caucasian | 45.0% |
| 2010 | NY | 1840 | 3.30 | Unknown | Caucasian | 30.7% |
| 2010 | (Private) | 1840 | 3.40 | Top 30% | Caucasian | 43.5% |
| 2010 | (Private) | 1840 | 3.20 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 25.7% |
| 2010 | NY | 1830 | 3.64 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 82.1% |
| 2010 | NY | 1830 | 3.68 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 74.4% |
| 2010 | NY | 1820 | 3.60 | Top 35% | Caucasian | 54.3% |
| 2010 | NJ | 1810 | 3.92 | Unknown | Hispanic | 100.0% |
| 2010 | NJ | 1810 | 2.80 | Class Not Ranked | East Asian | 62.4% |
| 2010 | NY | 1800 | 3.55 | Top 35% | Caucasian | 46.3% |
| 2010 | NY | 1790 | 3.24 | Unknown | East Asian | 19.6% |
| 2010 | NY | 1790 | 3.30 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 23.9% |
| 2010 | NY | 1720 | 3.20 | Unknown | Caucasian | 10.7% |
| 2010 | NY | 1720 | 3.30 | Top 15% | Hispanic | 92.1% |
| 2010 | NJ | 1710 | 3.68 | Top 40% | South Asian | 90.8% |
| 2010 | NY | 1710 | 3.70 | Unknown | Caucasian | 26.7% |
| 2010 | NY | 1700 | 3.30 | Bottom 50% | Caucasian | 19.9% |
| 2010 | NY | 1700 | 2.80 | Class Not Ranked | South Asian | 3.4% |
| 2010 | NJ | 1700 | 3.76 | Unknown | African-American | 99.8% |
| 2010 | NY | 1680 | 3.65 | Top 3% | Caucasian | 16.1% |
| 2010 | NY | 1640 | 3.60 | Top 15% | South Asian | 13.0% |
| 2010 | NY | 1630 | 3.70 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 44.7% |
| 2010 | NY | 1620 | 3.50 | Top 25% | African-American | 97.8% |
| 2010 | NY | 1600 | 3.40 | Top 30% | Caucasian | 7.7% |
| 2010 | NY | 1580 | 3.50 | Bottom 50% | Caucasian | 22.7% |
| 2010 | NY | 1580 | 3.40 | Top 25% | East Asian | 6.0% |
| 2010 | NY | 1530 | 3.58 | Top 35% | African-American | 85.9% |
| 2010 | NY | 1520 | 3.30 | Top 15% | African-American | 65.1% |
| 2010 | SC | 1440 | 3.78 | Class Not Ranked | East Asian | 38.6% |
| 2010 | NY | 1400 | 3.86 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 94.8% |
| 2010 | NY | 1380 | 3.20 | Unknown | Hispanic | 28.2% |
| 2010 | NY | 31 | 3.50 | Unknown | Caucasian | 86.2% |
| 2010 | NY | 30 | 4.00 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 91.1% |
| 2010 | (Private) | 30 | 3.80 | Top 5% | African-American | 99.8% |
| 2010 | NY | 30 | 3.62 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 82.8% |
| 2010 | NY | 30 | 4.00 | Top 2% | Caucasian | 90.6% |
| 2010 | NY | 29 | 3.00 | Class Not Ranked | East Asian | 37.0% |
| 2010 | NY | 27 | 3.90 | Top 10% | None Indicated | 62.3% |
| 2010 | NY | 26 | 3.00 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 11.3% |
| 2010 | NY | 21 | 3.56 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 3.4% |
| 2009 | CT | 2400 | 4.00 | Valedictorian | Caucasian | 100.0% |
| 2009 | NY | 2170 | 3.84 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 96.8% |
| 2009 | NY | 2170 | 3.80 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 96.4% |
| 2009 | NY | 2130 | 3.75 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 94.3% |
| 2009 | NY | 2120 | 3.70 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 94.3% |
| 2009 | NY | 2060 | 3.50 | Top 10% | East Asian | 83.8% |
| 2009 | OR | 2050 | 3.50 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 99.7% |
| 2009 | NY | 2050 | 3.35 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 89.2% |
| 2009 | NY | 2040 | 3.50 | Unknown | Caucasian | 82.5% |
| 2009 | CT | 2030 | 3.80 | Top 20% | None Indicated | 99.4% |
| 2009 | NY | 2010 | 3.70 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 86.7% |
| 2009 | NY | 2000 | 3.75 | Class Not Ranked | Hispanic | 99.8% |
| 2009 | NY | 2000 | 2.80 | Class Not Ranked | Hispanic | 97.9% |
| 2009 | NJ | 1990 | 3.50 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 98.1% |
| 2009 | NY | 1960 | 3.60 | Class Not Ranked | East Asian | 74.1% |
| 2009 | XX | 1960 | 4.00 | Top 20% | East Asian | 99.3% |
| 2009 | XX | 1960 | 4.00 | Valedictorian | East Asian | 99.0% |
| 2009 | NY | 1950 | 3.41 | Class Not Ranked | East Asian | 74.0% |
| 2009 | NJ | 1950 | 3.10 | Class Not Ranked | East Asian | 92.9% |
| 2009 | NY | 1930 | 3.70 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 78.9% |
| 2009 | NY | 1910 | 3.60 | Class Not Ranked | Middle-Eastern | 64.7% |
| 2009 | NY | 1910 | 3.60 | Unknown | None Indicated | 64.7% |
| 2009 | NY | 1910 | 3.50 | Top 20% | South Asian | 61.2% |
| 2009 | NY | 1900 | 3.60 | Unknown | Caucasian | 62.1% |
| 2009 | NY | 1900 | 3.60 | Top 40% | Caucasian | 73.0% |
| 2009 | (Private) | 1900 | 3.50 | Unknown | Caucasian | 56.1% |
| 2009 | NY | 1860 | 3.68 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 64.8% |
| 2009 | NY | 1860 | 3.60 | Top 20% | Other | 55.8% |
| 2009 | NY | 1860 | 3.70 | Top 10% | East Asian | 57.0% |
| 2009 | NY | 1860 | 3.11 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 27.0% |
| 2009 | NY | 1860 | 3.20 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 29.6% |
| 2009 | XX | 1850 | 3.15 | Bottom 50% | East Asian | 92.2% |
| 2009 | NY | 1850 | 3.50 | Top 30% | Caucasian | 52.5% |
| 2009 | NY | 1850 | 3.60 | Unknown | Caucasian | 51.2% |
| 2009 | NY | 1840 | 3.66 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 52.2% |
| 2009 | PA | 1840 | 3.50 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 92.0% |
| 2009 | NY | 1840 | 3.65 | Top 20% | East Asian | 54.0% |
| 2009 | NY | 1830 | 3.33 | Top 40% | Caucasian | 55.9% |
| 2009 | NY | 1830 | 3.30 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 29.0% |
| 2009 | NY | 1830 | 3.70 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 50.1% |
| 2009 | NY | 1820 | 3.80 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 53.8% |
| 2009 | NY | 1820 | 3.54 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 43.0% |
| 2009 | NY | 1820 | 3.85 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 57.3% |
| 2009 | NY | 1790 | 3.60 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 39.9% |
| 2009 | NJ | 1780 | 3.00 | Top 40% | Other | 77.4% |
| 2009 | NY | 1770 | 3.20 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 14.1% |
| 2009 | NY | 1760 | 3.60 | Unknown | Caucasian | 31.3% |
| 2009 | NY | 1750 | 3.80 | Top 10% | East Asian | 87.2% |
| 2009 | NY | 1740 | 4.00 | Top 5% | East Asian | 45.5% |
| 2009 | HI | 1730 | 3.90 | Top 1% | Caucasian | 90.5% |
| 2009 | NY | 1680 | 3.30 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 9.2% |
| 2009 | NY | 1660 | 3.50 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 12.1% |
| 2009 | NY | 1660 | 3.40 | Class Not Ranked | South Asian | 9.7% |
| 2009 | NY | 1640 | 3.67 | Top 5% | Hispanic | 92.1% |
| 2009 | (Private) | 1630 | 3.85 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 18.4% |
| 2009 | MA | 1620 | 3.74 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 76.9% |
| 2009 | NY | 1620 | 3.50 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 9.6% |
| 2009 | NJ | 1570 | 3.60 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 94.3% |
| 2009 | NY | 1570 | 3.50 | Top 5% | African-American | 79.7% |
| 2009 | NY | 1510 | 3.50 | Top 30% | African-American | 78.8% |
| 2009 | NY | 1230 | 3.10 | Unknown | African-American | 7.1% |
| 2009 | NY | 33 | 4.00 | Top 1% | Caucasian | 98.0% |
| 2009 | NY | 32 | 3.85 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 95.5% |
| 2009 | NY | 31 | 3.60 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 88.9% |
| 2009 | NY | 30 | 3.70 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 86.7% |
| 2009 | NJ | 29 | 3.50 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 97.3% |
| 2009 | (Private) | 28 | 3.80 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 69.2% |
| 2009 | NY | 28 | 3.00 | Top 40% | Other | 35.7% |
| 2009 | NY | 26 | 3.76 | Top 1% | South Asian | 39.1% |
| 2008 | NY | 2370 | 3.93 | Class Not Ranked | East Asian | 99.7% |
| 2008 | NY | 2230 | 3.80 | Top 10% | East Asian | 98.1% |
| 2008 | NY | 2160 | 3.85 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 96.6% |
| 2008 | NY | 2130 | 3.85 | Unknown | East Asian | 97.9% |
| 2008 | NY | 2100 | 3.70 | Class Not Ranked | South Asian | 93.1% |
| 2008 | NY | 2060 | 3.60 | Unknown | African-American | 99.8% |
| 2008 | (Private) | 2030 | 3.75 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 89.0% |
| 2008 | NY | 2030 | 3.70 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 87.7% |
| 2008 | NY | 2020 | 3.70 | Top 10% | Hispanic | 99.8% |
| 2008 | NY | 2010 | 4.00 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 91.9% |
| 2008 | NY | 2010 | 3.78 | Top 10% | East Asian | 86.7% |
| 2008 | NY | 2010 | 3.65 | Unknown | Caucasian | 83.9% |
| 2008 | NY | 1990 | 3.55 | Unknown | Caucasian | 76.9% |
| 2008 | NY | 1970 | 3.60 | Top 20% | East Asian | 77.9% |
| 2008 | NY | 1960 | 3.80 | Top 1% | Hispanic | 99.7% |
| 2008 | NY | 1960 | 3.80 | Top 5% | East Asian | 79.4% |
| 2008 | NY | 1950 | 3.58 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 73.4% |
| 2008 | NY | 1950 | 3.40 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 63.8% |
| 2008 | NY | 1900 | 4.00 | Top 1% | Middle-Eastern | 77.1% |
| 2008 | NY | 1890 | 3.70 | Top 10% | None Indicated | 63.6% |
| 2008 | NJ | 1880 | 3.60 | Unknown | Caucasian | 96.0% |
| 2008 | NY | 1870 | 3.70 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 63.8% |
| 2008 | NY | 1870 | 3.85 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 67.7% |
| 2008 | NY | 1860 | 3.50 | Unknown | Caucasian | 54.0% |
| 2008 | NY | 1860 | 3.20 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 31.7% |
| 2008 | NY | 1810 | 3.30 | Unknown | Caucasian | 25.1% |
| 2008 | NY | 1770 | 3.60 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 38.6% |
| 2008 | NY | 1770 | 3.30 | Unknown | Caucasian | 18.9% |
| 2008 | NY | 1760 | 3.72 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 40.4% |
| 2008 | NY | 1710 | 3.40 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 14.7% |
| 2008 | NY | 1710 | 3.08 | Bottom 50% | East Asian | 13.5% |
| 2008 | MA | 1630 | 3.60 | Unknown | East Asian | 69.8% |
| 2008 | NY | 35 | 4.00 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 99.6% |
| 2008 | NY | 29 | 3.30 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 55.4% |
| 2008 | NY | 28 | 4.00 | Class Not Ranked | African-American | 99.7% |
| 2008 | NY | 26 | 3.65 | Top 20% | None Indicated | 41.6% |
| 2007 | NY | 2090 | 3.20 | Unknown | Caucasian | 78.2% |
| 2007 | PA | 2040 | 3.80 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 99.4% |
| 2007 | NY | 2020 | 3.70 | Unknown | Other | 86.5% |
| 2007 | DE | 1780 | 3.80 | Top 5% | None Indicated | 98.4% |
| 2007 | NY | 34 | 3.70 | Unknown | East Asian | 98.4% |
|
| 2012 | NY | 2140 | 3.30 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 87.8% |
| 2012 | NY | 2110 | 3.50 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 90.0% |
| 2012 | NJ | 1980 | 3.60 | Top 20% | East Asian | 98.5% |
| 2012 | FL | 1820 | 3.17 | Unknown | Hispanic | 99.9% |
| 2011 | NY | 2360 | 3.80 | Bottom 40% | East Asian | 99.9% |
| 2011 | (Private) | 2340 | 3.68 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 99.1% |
| 2011 | NY | 2320 | 4.00 | Top 1% | East Asian | 99.4% |
| 2011 | NY | 2310 | 3.70 | Top 15% | Caucasian | 99.0% |
| 2011 | NY | 2250 | 3.90 | Top 5% | South Asian | 98.7% |
| 2011 | NY | 2250 | 3.80 | Top 5% | East Asian | 98.3% |
| 2011 | NY | 2210 | 3.72 | Top 15% | Hispanic | 100.0% |
| 2011 | NY | 2200 | 3.35 | Class Not Ranked | East Asian | 93.4% |
| 2011 | NY | 2120 | 3.85 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 95.2% |
| 2011 | NY | 2110 | 3.81 | Top 2% | Caucasian | 93.7% |
| 2011 | VA | 2100 | 3.80 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 99.7% |
| 2011 | NY | 2100 | 3.80 | Unknown | Caucasian | 94.6% |
| 2011 | NY | 2080 | 4.00 | Top 5% | Hispanic | 99.9% |
| 2011 | NY | 2080 | 3.52 | Unknown | South Asian | 87.7% |
| 2011 | NY | 2070 | 3.75 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 91.3% |
| 2011 | NC | 2050 | 3.50 | Unknown | Caucasian | 98.9% |
| 2011 | NY | 2030 | 3.15 | Class Not Ranked | East Asian | 64.4% |
| 2011 | NY | 1990 | 3.81 | Top 25% | Caucasian | 88.6% |
| 2011 | NY | 1950 | 3.52 | Unknown | Caucasian | 68.3% |
| 2011 | CA | 1950 | 3.30 | Class Not Ranked | South Asian | 95.5% |
| 2011 | CA | 1890 | 2.80 | Unknown | Caucasian | 77.9% |
| 2011 | MD | 1860 | 3.40 | Top 15% | Caucasian | 92.3% |
| 2011 | NY | 1800 | 3.50 | Top 30% | Caucasian | 40.7% |
| 2011 | NY | 1760 | 3.48 | Unknown | Caucasian | 25.2% |
| 2011 | NY | 1760 | 3.67 | Top 15% | Caucasian | 35.2% |
| 2011 | NJ | 1700 | 0.00 | Unknown | Caucasian | 0.1% |
| 2011 | NY | 1690 | 2.90 | Bottom 30% | Caucasian | 10.9% |
| 2011 | CA | 1680 | 3.60 | Top 15% | African-American | 99.7% |
| 2011 | NJ | 1600 | 2.95 | Bottom 40% | Caucasian | 45.9% |
| 2011 | NJ | 1550 | 3.40 | Unknown | Other | 40.5% |
| 2011 | MD | 1480 | 3.73 | Top 15% | South Asian | 44.3% |
| 2011 | MA | 32 | 3.30 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 99.1% |
| 2011 | CA | 30 | 3.20 | Unknown | Caucasian | 96.7% |
| 2011 | OH | 29 | 3.79 | Class Not Ranked | African-American | 100.0% |
| 2011 | NY | 28 | 3.20 | Unknown | Caucasian | 35.7% |
| 2011 | NY | 25 | 3.20 | Unknown | Caucasian | 10.7% |
| 2010 | (Private) | 2400 | 4.00 | Unknown | Caucasian | 99.8% |
| 2010 | NY | 2340 | 4.00 | Top 1% | Caucasian | 99.7% |
| 2010 | NY | 2320 | 4.00 | Top 1% | Caucasian | 99.4% |
| 2010 | NY | 2320 | 3.80 | Unknown | None Indicated | 99.3% |
| 2010 | NY | 2320 | 3.35 | Top 30% | Caucasian | 98.3% |
| 2010 | NY | 2310 | 3.50 | Top 20% | East Asian | 98.5% |
| 2010 | NY | 2300 | 3.85 | Class Not Ranked | South Asian | 99.2% |
| 2010 | NY | 2290 | 3.76 | Top 10% | East Asian | 98.8% |
| 2010 | NY | 2280 | 4.00 | Top 2% | Caucasian | 99.5% |
| 2010 | NY | 2250 | 3.80 | Class Not Ranked | South Asian | 98.6% |
| 2010 | NY | 2240 | 4.00 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 98.9% |
| 2010 | (Private) | 2230 | 3.78 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 98.7% |
| 2010 | VA | 2230 | 3.80 | Top 15% | None Indicated | 99.9% |
| 2010 | NY | 2230 | 3.93 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 98.6% |
| 2010 | NY | 2220 | 3.80 | Top 5% | East Asian | 97.7% |
| 2010 | NY | 2220 | 3.90 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 98.6% |
| 2010 | NY | 2220 | 3.75 | Class Not Ranked | East Asian | 97.9% |
| 2010 | NY | 2210 | 3.50 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 95.4% |
| 2010 | NY | 2210 | 3.83 | Unknown | None Indicated | 98.1% |
| 2010 | NY | 2200 | 3.84 | Top 2% | East Asian | 97.4% |
| 2010 | CA | 2190 | 3.66 | Top 15% | Caucasian | 99.9% |
| 2010 | NY | 2190 | 3.66 | Top 10% | East Asian | 96.2% |
| 2010 | NY | 2190 | 3.95 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 98.1% |
| 2010 | CT | 2180 | 3.50 | Top 20% | East Asian | 99.7% |
| 2010 | NY | 2180 | 3.64 | Class Not Ranked | East Asian | 96.1% |
| 2010 | NJ | 2180 | 3.95 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 99.9% |
| 2010 | CT | 2170 | 3.60 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 99.7% |
| 2010 | NY | 2170 | 3.70 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 96.3% |
| 2010 | NY | 2160 | 4.00 | Valedictorian | Caucasian | 97.4% |
| 2010 | NY | 2160 | 3.30 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 89.7% |
| 2010 | NY | 2140 | 3.15 | Bottom 50% | East Asian | 94.1% |
| 2010 | NY | 2130 | 3.76 | Top 10% | East Asian | 95.0% |
| 2010 | NY | 2130 | 3.52 | Unknown | East Asian | 92.0% |
| 2010 | NY | 2130 | 3.80 | Top 15% | Hispanic | 99.9% |
| 2010 | NY | 2120 | 3.87 | Top 10% | Other | 97.7% |
| 2010 | NJ | 2120 | 4.00 | Top 1% | East Asian | 99.8% |
| 2010 | NY | 2120 | 3.60 | Unknown | Caucasian | 92.8% |
| 2010 | NY | 2110 | 3.80 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 95.4% |
| 2010 | NC | 2110 | 3.49 | Top 15% | East Asian | 99.3% |
| 2010 | NY | 2110 | 3.70 | Class Not Ranked | None Indicated | 93.7% |
| 2010 | NY | 2110 | 3.80 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 95.0% |
| 2010 | NY | 2110 | 3.65 | Unknown | East Asian | 92.9% |
| 2010 | NJ | 2100 | 3.22 | Unknown | East Asian | 98.6% |
| 2010 | NY | 2100 | 3.70 | Class Not Ranked | East Asian | 93.1% |
| 2010 | NY | 2090 | 3.96 | Top 5% | South Asian | 95.1% |
| 2010 | NY | 2080 | 3.97 | Top 10% | African-American | 100.0% |
| 2010 | NY | 2080 | 3.40 | Class Not Ranked | Hispanic | 99.8% |
| 2010 | NY | 2080 | 3.70 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 91.8% |
| 2010 | NY | 2080 | 3.60 | Top 15% | Caucasian | 89.7% |
| 2010 | NY | 2070 | 3.40 | Top 20% | Middle-Eastern | 84.3% |
| 2010 | CA | 2070 | 3.43 | Top 30% | East Asian | 99.2% |
| 2010 | NY | 2070 | 3.70 | Top 30% | Caucasian | 93.3% |
| 2010 | NY | 2060 | 3.90 | Top 4% | Caucasian | 96.0% |
| 2010 | NJ | 2060 | 3.50 | Bottom 50% | Caucasian | 99.5% |
| 2010 | NY | 2050 | 3.80 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 97.0% |
| 2010 | NY | 2050 | 3.80 | Class Not Ranked | Hispanic | 99.9% |
| 2010 | NY | 2050 | 3.70 | Top 15% | Caucasian | 89.4% |
| 2010 | NY | 2050 | 3.66 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 88.4% |
| 2010 | NY | 2050 | 3.84 | Top 1% | Caucasian | 90.1% |
| 2010 | (Private) | 2050 | 3.70 | Top 15% | South Asian | 89.4% |
| 2010 | NY | 2050 | 3.72 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 88.9% |
| 2010 | NY | 2050 | 3.68 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 88.9% |
| 2010 | NY | 2050 | 3.65 | Top 35% | East Asian | 91.8% |
| 2010 | NJ | 2050 | 3.60 | Top 4% | Caucasian | 98.9% |
| 2010 | NY | 2040 | 3.85 | Class Not Ranked | East Asian | 97.9% |
| 2010 | NY | 2040 | 3.80 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 93.0% |
| 2010 | XX | 2040 | 3.30 | Class Not Ranked | East Asian | 98.0% |
| 2010 | MD | 2040 | 3.68 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 99.2% |
| 2010 | NJ | 2040 | 3.72 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 99.4% |
| 2010 | NY | 2040 | 4.00 | Top 15% | Caucasian | 94.3% |
| 2010 | NY | 2030 | 3.80 | Unknown | East Asian | 90.2% |
| 2010 | NY | 2030 | 3.70 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 88.8% |
| 2010 | NY | 2010 | 3.76 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 84.8% |
| 2010 | NH | 2010 | 3.40 | Top 10% | South Asian | 97.8% |
| 2010 | NY | 2010 | 3.10 | Class Not Ranked | South Asian | 56.8% |
| 2010 | NY | 2010 | 3.66 | Class Not Ranked | South Asian | 84.2% |
| 2010 | NY | 2010 | 2.83 | Unknown | Caucasian | 40.1% |
| 2010 | NY | 2010 | 3.72 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 86.1% |
| 2010 | NY | 2000 | 3.90 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 89.9% |
| 2010 | NY | 2000 | 3.70 | Class Not Ranked | Middle-Eastern | 84.4% |
| 2010 | NY | 1990 | 3.76 | Top 10% | East Asian | 83.6% |
| 2010 | NY | 1990 | 3.56 | Bottom 50% | East Asian | 87.3% |
| 2010 | VA | 1990 | 3.97 | Top 10% | Other | 99.3% |
| 2010 | PA | 1990 | 2.98 | Bottom 50% | Caucasian | 96.5% |
| 2010 | NY | 1980 | 3.50 | Top 15% | Caucasian | 78.1% |
| 2010 | NY | 1980 | 3.52 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 74.0% |
| 2010 | NY | 1980 | 3.33 | Class Not Ranked | East Asian | 63.9% |
| 2010 | NY | 1980 | 4.00 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 88.5% |
| 2010 | NY | 1980 | 3.20 | Top 35% | Caucasian | 65.6% |
| 2010 | GA | 1980 | 3.10 | Bottom 50% | East Asian | 97.2% |
| 2010 | NY | 1960 | 3.50 | Top 30% | Other | 75.0% |
| 2010 | NY | 1950 | 3.97 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 84.4% |
| 2010 | NY | 1950 | 3.00 | Unknown | East Asian | 37.0% |
| 2010 | NY | 1950 | 3.72 | Top 10% | Other | 76.2% |
| 2010 | NY | 1940 | 3.84 | Top 15% | Caucasian | 89.3% |
| 2010 | NY | 1940 | 4.00 | Top 1% | Hispanic | 99.8% |
| 2010 | NY | 1940 | 3.70 | Class Not Ranked | African-American | 99.6% |
| 2010 | PA | 1940 | 3.66 | Top 2% | Hispanic | 100.0% |
| 2010 | NY | 1930 | 3.50 | Unknown | South Asian | 97.4% |
| 2010 | NY | 1930 | 3.95 | Top 1% | Caucasian | 79.7% |
| 2010 | NY | 1930 | 3.72 | Class Not Ranked | East Asian | 74.5% |
| 2010 | NY | 1930 | 3.64 | Unknown | East Asian | 70.5% |
| 2010 | NY | 1920 | 3.60 | Unknown | Caucasian | 66.6% |
| 2010 | NY | 1920 | 2.70 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 17.3% |
| 2010 | NY | 1920 | 2.80 | Unknown | Hispanic | 95.6% |
| 2010 | NJ | 1920 | 3.30 | Top 20% | None Indicated | 94.7% |
| 2010 | NY | 1920 | 3.69 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 73.4% |
| 2010 | GA | 1910 | 3.60 | Top 40% | East Asian | 98.1% |
| 2010 | NY | 1900 | 3.84 | Top 2% | Caucasian | 95.1% |
| 2010 | NY | 1900 | 3.88 | Top 2% | Caucasian | 71.8% |
| 2010 | NY | 1900 | 3.60 | Top 15% | Hispanic | 99.2% |
| 2010 | XX | 1900 | 3.50 | Top 5% | South Asian | 94.7% |
| 2010 | CT | 1890 | 3.40 | Unknown | Caucasian | 96.5% |
| 2010 | NY | 1890 | 3.50 | Class Not Ranked | Hispanic | 99.0% |
| 2010 | XX | 1890 | 4.00 | Top 5% | East Asian | 98.3% |
| 2010 | NY | 1890 | 3.20 | Unknown | East Asian | 35.7% |
| 2010 | NY | 1890 | 3.90 | Top 15% | Caucasian | 76.1% |
| 2010 | NY | 1890 | 3.70 | Top 20% | Hispanic | 99.4% |
| 2010 | NY | 1880 | 3.00 | Class Not Ranked | East Asian | 23.6% |
| 2010 | NY | 1880 | 3.50 | Unknown | East Asian | 51.9% |
| 2010 | NY | 1880 | 3.58 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 56.9% |
| 2010 | NY | 1870 | 3.70 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 90.3% |
| 2010 | NY | 1870 | 3.70 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 61.4% |
| 2010 | NY | 1860 | 3.50 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 78.1% |
| 2010 | NY | 1860 | 3.18 | Top 40% | Caucasian | 39.7% |
| 2010 | (Private) | 1860 | 3.60 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 53.3% |
| 2010 | NY | 1860 | 3.20 | Top 15% | African-American | 97.1% |
| 2010 | NY | 1850 | 3.60 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 51.2% |
| 2010 | NY | 1850 | 3.00 | Class Not Ranked | Middle-Eastern | 19.0% |
| 2010 | NJ | 1840 | 3.30 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 97.4% |
| 2010 | NY | 1840 | 2.80 | Class Not Ranked | Hispanic | 91.1% |
| 2010 | CT | 1830 | 3.58 | Top 5% | None Indicated | 95.3% |
| 2010 | NJ | 1820 | 3.40 | Class Not Ranked | East Asian | 94.0% |
| 2010 | NJ | 1820 | 0.00 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 0.2% |
| 2010 | FL | 1810 | 3.45 | Top 15% | South Asian | 94.7% |
| 2010 | NY | 1790 | 3.80 | Top 10% | East Asian | 47.3% |
| 2010 | NY | 1780 | 3.54 | Class Not Ranked | Hispanic | 97.4% |
| 2010 | MA | 1780 | 0.00 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 0.1% |
| 2010 | NY | 1750 | 3.73 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 51.9% |
| 2010 | XX | 1750 | 3.50 | Top 10% | None Indicated | 83.2% |
| 2010 | NY | 1750 | 3.72 | Top 10% | East Asian | 33.2% |
| 2010 | NY | 1750 | 3.00 | Class Not Ranked | East Asian | 8.3% |
| 2010 | NY | 1730 | 3.50 | Top 25% | Caucasian | 24.7% |
| 2010 | NY | 1720 | 4.00 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 47.0% |
| 2010 | XX | 1720 | 3.60 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 82.8% |
| 2010 | NY | 1710 | 3.80 | Unknown | Caucasian | 48.4% |
| 2010 | NY | 1710 | 3.59 | Unknown | East Asian | 21.7% |
| 2010 | NY | 1710 | 3.00 | Bottom 50% | Hispanic | 91.1% |
| 2010 | NY | 1700 | 3.70 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 27.0% |
| 2010 | NY | 1700 | 3.75 | Top 25% | Caucasian | 31.7% |
| 2010 | NY | 1700 | 3.30 | Unknown | East Asian | 11.0% |
| 2010 | NY | 1690 | 3.75 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 25.3% |
| 2010 | NY | 1690 | 3.00 | Top 35% | South Asian | 7.2% |
| 2010 | NY | 1690 | 3.70 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 19.7% |
| 2010 | NY | 1680 | 3.80 | Top 4% | East Asian | 22.1% |
| 2010 | NY | 1680 | 3.26 | Unknown | East Asian | 8.4% |
| 2010 | CT | 1670 | 3.35 | Unknown | None Indicated | 75.1% |
| 2010 | NJ | 1670 | 3.67 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 80.3% |
| 2010 | NY | 1670 | 3.50 | Top 30% | East Asian | 17.2% |
| 2010 | NY | 1640 | 3.70 | Top 15% | Caucasian | 19.3% |
| 2010 | NY | 1630 | 3.72 | Top 15% | Caucasian | 15.3% |
| 2010 | NY | 1620 | 3.48 | Unknown | East Asian | 8.4% |
| 2010 | NY | 1590 | 3.36 | Unknown | East Asian | 4.9% |
| 2010 | NY | 1560 | 3.59 | Unknown | Hispanic | 84.7% |
| 2010 | NY | 1540 | 3.30 | Unknown | African-American | 80.3% |
| 2010 | NY | 1520 | 3.68 | Top 10% | East Asian | 5.1% |
| 2010 | NY | 1500 | 3.20 | Unknown | Caucasian | 1.5% |
| 2010 | NY | 1420 | 3.50 | Top 25% | Caucasian | 1.8% |
| 2010 | NY | 1410 | 3.60 | Unknown | Hispanic | 58.5% |
| 2010 | NY | 1390 | 3.30 | Class Not Ranked | Hispanic | 35.4% |
| 2010 | NY | 1370 | 2.30 | Bottom 20% | Caucasian | 0.2% |
| 2010 | NY | 1350 | 3.20 | Unknown | East Asian | 0.4% |
| 2010 | NY | 1290 | 3.40 | Unknown | Caucasian | 0.3% |
| 2010 | NY | 1260 | 3.00 | Unknown | Hispanic | 7.3% |
| 2010 | RI | 1250 | 2.90 | Bottom 50% | Caucasian | 2.4% |
| 2010 | NY | 1190 | 3.80 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 91.5% |
| 2010 | NY | 600 | 4.00 | Top 1% | Caucasian | 99.7% |
| 2010 | NY | 34 | 3.40 | Top 30% | Native American | 100.0% |
| 2010 | NY | 34 | 3.85 | Top 5% | African-American | 100.0% |
| 2010 | NY | 33 | 3.68 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 96.4% |
| 2010 | NY | 32 | 3.96 | Top 3% | East Asian | 96.4% |
| 2010 | MN | 32 | 3.96 | Top 1% | East Asian | 99.8% |
| 2010 | NY | 31 | 3.70 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 91.1% |
| 2010 | NY | 29 | 2.80 | Class Not Ranked | South Asian | 26.2% |
| 2010 | NY | 28 | 3.63 | Class Not Ranked | East Asian | 61.9% |
| 2010 | NY | 27 | 3.50 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 40.2% |
| 2010 | NY | 27 | 3.50 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 40.2% |
| 2010 | NY | 27 | 3.50 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 42.6% |
| 2010 | NY | 25 | 2.90 | Class Not Ranked | Middle-Eastern | 5.4% |
| 2010 | MN | 25 | 3.30 | Top 10% | Other | 70.7% |
| 2010 | NJ | 25 | 3.40 | Unknown | South Asian | 77.4% |
| 2010 | OK | 24 | 3.94 | Top 5% | East Asian | 86.1% |
| 2010 | MN | 23 | 2.81 | Unknown | South Asian | 20.4% |
| 2009 | NY | 2400 | 3.90 | Top 1% | South Asian | 99.6% |
| 2009 | NY | 2400 | 4.00 | Top 20% | South Asian | 99.8% |
| 2009 | NY | 2310 | 4.00 | Unknown | Caucasian | 99.5% |
| 2009 | NJ | 2270 | 3.87 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 99.9% |
| 2009 | NY | 2240 | 3.80 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 98.5% |
| 2009 | NY | 2210 | 3.75 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 98.5% |
| 2009 | NY | 2210 | 4.00 | Top 10% | Hispanic | 100.0% |
| 2009 | NY | 2210 | 4.00 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 98.5% |
| 2009 | NJ | 2200 | 3.90 | Class Not Ranked | East Asian | 99.9% |
| 2009 | NY | 2180 | 3.40 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 93.1% |
| 2009 | NY | 2160 | 3.75 | Unknown | Middle-Eastern | 96.4% |
| 2009 | NY | 2160 | 3.72 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 95.3% |
| 2009 | NY | 2150 | 4.00 | Top 1% | Caucasian | 99.0% |
| 2009 | NY | 2130 | 3.60 | Unknown | South Asian | 93.3% |
| 2009 | NY | 2130 | 3.70 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 94.2% |
| 2009 | NY | 2120 | 3.50 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 90.9% |
| 2009 | NY | 2120 | 3.74 | Class Not Ranked | East Asian | 94.8% |
| 2009 | NY | 2110 | 4.00 | Top 1% | Caucasian | 95.9% |
| 2009 | NY | 2110 | 3.95 | Top 1% | South Asian | 95.4% |
| 2009 | NY | 2110 | 3.50 | Unknown | East Asian | 90.0% |
| 2009 | NY | 2100 | 3.50 | Top 10% | East Asian | 94.5% |
| 2009 | NY | 2100 | 3.40 | Bottom 50% | East Asian | 94.5% |
| 2009 | NY | 2090 | 3.70 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 91.9% |
| 2009 | (Private) | 2090 | 3.40 | Unknown | East Asian | 85.5% |
| 2009 | NY | 2080 | 3.68 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 89.7% |
| 2009 | NY | 2070 | 3.75 | Top 10% | South Asian | 91.3% |
| 2009 | NY | 2070 | 3.50 | Top 30% | East Asian | 89.4% |
| 2009 | NY | 2060 | 3.80 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 91.7% |
| 2009 | NJ | 2060 | 3.00 | Class Not Ranked | Other | 96.6% |
| 2009 | NY | 2060 | 3.50 | Top 30% | Hispanic | 99.8% |
| 2009 | NY | 2050 | 3.40 | Unknown | Caucasian | 80.0% |
| 2009 | NY | 2050 | 3.70 | Unknown | South Asian | 89.4% |
| 2009 | NY | 2040 | 3.70 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 88.6% |
| 2009 | NJ | 2030 | 3.79 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 99.3% |
| 2009 | PA | 2020 | 3.70 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 99.2% |
| 2009 | NY | 2010 | 3.50 | Unknown | Caucasian | 78.1% |
| 2009 | NY | 2010 | 3.52 | Top 20% | Middle-Eastern | 80.6% |
| 2009 | NY | 2000 | 3.80 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 97.3% |
| 2009 | NY | 2000 | 3.76 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 86.3% |
| 2009 | NY | 1990 | 3.80 | Top 10% | East Asian | 84.9% |
| 2009 | NY | 1980 | 3.90 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 89.8% |
| 2009 | NY | 1980 | 3.30 | Class Not Ranked | Hispanic | 99.2% |
| 2009 | NY | 1980 | 3.37 | Top 40% | Caucasian | 76.3% |
| 2009 | NJ | 1970 | 3.00 | Class Not Ranked | Other | 99.8% |
| 2009 | NY | 1970 | 3.10 | Class Not Ranked | Middle-Eastern | 47.8% |
| 2009 | NJ | 1970 | 3.00 | Class Not Ranked | Other | 92.5% |
| 2009 | NJ | 1970 | 3.05 | Class Not Ranked | Other | 93.3% |
| 2009 | NJ | 1970 | 3.00 | Class Not Ranked | Other | 92.5% |
| 2009 | NY | 1960 | 3.73 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 85.2% |
| 2009 | NY | 1950 | 3.60 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 88.9% |
| 2009 | NY | 1940 | 3.70 | Class Not Ranked | East Asian | 75.6% |
| 2009 | NY | 1930 | 3.63 | Unknown | Caucasian | 70.0% |
| 2009 | (Private) | 1920 | 3.90 | Salutatorian | Other | 80.5% |
| 2009 | NY | 1920 | 3.60 | Unknown | Caucasian | 66.6% |
| 2009 | NY | 1910 | 3.70 | Unknown | Hispanic | 99.5% |
| 2009 | NJ | 1910 | 3.60 | Class Not Ranked | East Asian | 96.9% |
| 2009 | NY | 1900 | 3.70 | Unknown | Caucasian | 94.7% |
| 2009 | NY | 1900 | 3.70 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 78.9% |
| 2009 | NY | 1900 | 3.50 | Top 20% | Hispanic | 99.1% |
| 2009 | NY | 1890 | 3.00 | Unknown | Hispanic | 96.4% |
| 2009 | NY | 1870 | 3.50 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 51.6% |
| 2009 | NY | 1870 | 3.00 | Class Not Ranked | Middle-Eastern | 21.7% |
| 2009 | NY | 1870 | 3.90 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 70.4% |
| 2009 | NY | 1870 | 3.50 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 49.1% |
| 2009 | NY | 1860 | 3.43 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 40.3% |
| 2009 | NY | 1850 | 2.70 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 10.0% |
| 2009 | NY | 1850 | 3.47 | Class Not Ranked | East Asian | 43.1% |
| 2009 | NY | 1840 | 3.30 | Top 40% | South Asian | 54.0% |
| 2009 | NY | 1840 | 3.80 | Top 10% | East Asian | 58.3% |
| 2009 | NJ | 1840 | 3.36 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 89.9% |
| 2009 | NY | 1840 | 3.50 | Unknown | East Asian | 42.2% |
| 2009 | NY | 1830 | 3.90 | Top 20% | None Indicated | 66.9% |
| 2009 | PR | 1830 | 3.55 | Top 10% | Hispanic | 99.9% |
| 2009 | NY | 1820 | 3.70 | Top 5% | South Asian | 45.5% |
| 2009 | NY | 1820 | 3.50 | Unknown | Caucasian | 38.2% |
| 2009 | NY | 1820 | 3.70 | Salutatorian | Caucasian | 43.0% |
| 2009 | (Private) | 1810 | 3.75 | Top 20% | South Asian | 53.3% |
| 2009 | NY | 1810 | 3.81 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 52.1% |
| 2009 | NY | 1810 | 3.81 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 52.1% |
| 2009 | NY | 1810 | 3.68 | Top 10% | East Asian | 44.0% |
| 2009 | NY | 1800 | 3.50 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 62.6% |
| 2009 | NY | 1800 | 3.75 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 48.7% |
| 2009 | NY | 1800 | 3.20 | Unknown | Other | 19.4% |
| 2009 | NJ | 1790 | 2.80 | Unknown | South Asian | 66.9% |
| 2009 | NY | 1790 | 3.80 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 47.3% |
| 2009 | NY | 1790 | 3.52 | Bottom 50% | South Asian | 49.8% |
| 2009 | NY | 1790 | 2.50 | Bottom 40% | South Asian | 8.7% |
| 2009 | NY | 1770 | 3.50 | Unknown | East Asian | 27.8% |
| 2009 | NY | 1760 | 3.60 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 33.5% |
| 2009 | NY | 1750 | 3.25 | Class Not Ranked | Hispanic | 93.2% |
| 2009 | NY | 1750 | 3.60 | Unknown | Caucasian | 28.9% |
| 2009 | NY | 1750 | 3.45 | Unknown | Caucasian | 21.9% |
| 2009 | NY | 1740 | 3.30 | Unknown | South Asian | 15.0% |
| 2009 | NY | 1710 | 3.64 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 24.6% |
| 2009 | NY | 1710 | 3.50 | Unknown | Caucasian | 18.1% |
| 2009 | NJ | 1700 | 3.30 | Bottom 50% | East Asian | 81.1% |
| 2009 | NY | 1700 | 3.50 | Top 20% | Hispanic | 94.8% |
| 2009 | NY | 1700 | 3.00 | Top 40% | Caucasian | 8.8% |
| 2009 | NY | 1700 | 3.64 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 19.1% |
| 2009 | NY | 1690 | 3.70 | Top 20% | Hispanic | 96.4% |
| 2009 | MA | 1650 | 3.80 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 83.7% |
| 2009 | NY | 1630 | 3.50 | Class Not Ranked | Hispanic | 89.4% |
| 2009 | NY | 1620 | 3.55 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 10.7% |
| 2009 | VA | 1610 | 3.50 | Top 20% | South Asian | 62.8% |
| 2009 | MA | 1590 | 3.36 | Top 30% | Caucasian | 57.8% |
| 2009 | AR | 1580 | 3.96 | Top 20% | East Asian | 80.1% |
| 2009 | NY | 1580 | 3.30 | Top 10% | Hispanic | 74.7% |
| 2009 | NY | 1570 | 3.70 | Top 30% | Caucasian | 11.7% |
| 2009 | NY | 1560 | 3.50 | Unknown | Caucasian | 5.2% |
| 2009 | NY | 1530 | 3.70 | Top 40% | Other | 10.2% |
| 2009 | NJ | 1520 | 2.70 | Class Not Ranked | Middle-Eastern | 8.2% |
| 2009 | NY | 1500 | 3.50 | Top 5% | African-American | 67.5% |
| 2009 | NY | 1480 | 3.10 | Bottom 50% | Other | 1.9% |
| 2009 | NJ | 1470 | 3.00 | Unknown | Caucasian | 19.1% |
| 2009 | NY | 1420 | 3.00 | Unknown | African-American | 25.5% |
| 2009 | NY | 1400 | 3.30 | Bottom 40% | East Asian | 1.8% |
| 2009 | (Private) | 1320 | 3.80 | Top 40% | Hispanic | 62.5% |
| 2009 | NY | 1300 | 2.75 | Unknown | Other | 0.1% |
| 2009 | NY | 1250 | 3.00 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 0.1% |
| 2009 | NY | 1240 | 3.20 | Bottom 50% | Caucasian | 0.3% |
| 2009 | NY | 33 | 3.75 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 97.3% |
| 2009 | NY | 33 | 3.90 | Top 1% | Caucasian | 97.5% |
| 2009 | (Private) | 32 | 3.30 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 99.1% |
| 2009 | NY | 31 | 4.00 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 94.7% |
| 2009 | CA | 31 | 3.40 | Top 40% | None Indicated | 99.3% |
| 2009 | NY | 30 | 3.50 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 78.1% |
| 2009 | NY | 30 | 3.70 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 85.5% |
| 2009 | FL | 30 | 3.33 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 97.6% |
| 2009 | NY | 29 | 4.00 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 85.4% |
| 2009 | NY | 28 | 4.00 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 78.7% |
| 2009 | NY | 27 | 3.30 | Top 20% | Hispanic | 97.3% |
| 2009 | NY | 27 | 3.80 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 61.1% |
| 2009 | NY | 27 | 3.74 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 57.5% |
| 2009 | NY | 26 | 3.65 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 41.6% |
| 2008 | XX | 2400 | 4.00 | Top 1% | East Asian | 100.0% |
| 2008 | NY | 2400 | 4.00 | Unknown | Other | 99.8% |
| 2008 | (Private) | 2270 | 3.80 | Unknown | Caucasian | 98.8% |
| 2008 | NY | 2270 | 4.00 | Top 10% | East Asian | 99.2% |
| 2008 | CT | 2230 | 3.85 | Top 1% | East Asian | 99.9% |
| 2008 | NY | 2180 | 3.97 | Top 10% | South Asian | 98.2% |
| 2008 | NY | 2180 | 3.80 | Class Not Ranked | African-American | 100.0% |
| 2008 | NY | 2170 | 4.00 | Unknown | Caucasian | 98.2% |
| 2008 | NY | 2150 | 3.70 | Unknown | Caucasian | 95.6% |
| 2008 | NY | 2130 | 3.90 | Unknown | None Indicated | 96.7% |
| 2008 | NY | 2130 | 3.60 | Unknown | Caucasian | 93.3% |
| 2008 | NY | 2120 | 3.70 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 98.6% |
| 2008 | NY | 2120 | 3.90 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 96.1% |
| 2008 | NY | 2110 | 3.70 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 93.7% |
| 2008 | NY | 2090 | 3.90 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 97.7% |
| 2008 | NY | 2090 | 3.83 | Class Not Ranked | East Asian | 96.1% |
| 2008 | NY | 2080 | 3.70 | Top 10% | East Asian | 91.0% |
| 2008 | NY | 2070 | 3.85 | Top 1% | East Asian | 91.9% |
| 2008 | NY | 2040 | 3.90 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 96.4% |
| 2008 | NY | 2040 | 3.60 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 87.0% |
| 2008 | (Private) | 2010 | 2.70 | Unknown | None Indicated | 89.3% |
| 2008 | NY | 2010 | 3.75 | Unknown | Caucasian | 87.0% |
| 2008 | NY | 2000 | 3.90 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 89.0% |
| 2008 | NY | 1990 | 3.40 | Unknown | East Asian | 69.6% |
| 2008 | NY | 1980 | 3.09 | Unknown | East Asian | 49.2% |
| 2008 | NY | 1970 | 4.00 | Unknown | Caucasian | 89.7% |
| 2008 | NY | 1950 | 3.90 | Top 1% | East Asian | 80.8% |
| 2008 | NY | 1940 | 2.80 | Unknown | East Asian | 24.7% |
| 2008 | NY | 1940 | 4.00 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 85.6% |
| 2008 | NY | 1930 | 3.40 | Unknown | None Indicated | 56.7% |
| 2008 | NY | 1930 | 4.00 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 82.8% |
| 2008 | NY | 1920 | 3.70 | Top 30% | Caucasian | 77.5% |
| 2008 | NY | 1900 | 3.60 | Unknown | East Asian | 62.1% |
| 2008 | NJ | 1890 | 3.40 | Unknown | East Asian | 94.0% |
| 2008 | NY | 1890 | 3.52 | Unknown | None Indicated | 55.2% |
| 2008 | NY | 1880 | 3.95 | Top 1% | Caucasian | 71.5% |
| 2008 | NY | 1880 | 3.40 | Bottom 50% | Caucasian | 62.9% |
| 2008 | NY | 1870 | 3.10 | Top 30% | Caucasian | 90.4% |
| 2008 | CA | 1840 | 3.54 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 93.3% |
| 2008 | XX | 1840 | 3.00 | Class Not Ranked | East Asian | 78.4% |
| 2008 | NY | 1830 | 3.90 | Top 10% | East Asian | 62.3% |
| 2008 | NY | 1820 | 3.30 | Top 30% | Caucasian | 33.6% |
| 2008 | XX | 1820 | 3.71 | Unknown | Other | 94.8% |
| 2008 | NY | 1800 | 3.00 | Unknown | Caucasian | 12.7% |
| 2008 | NY | 1800 | 3.20 | Top 20% | African-American | 95.5% |
| 2008 | NY | 1770 | 3.50 | Top 20% | East Asian | 29.9% |
| 2008 | NY | 1770 | 3.80 | Unknown | None Indicated | 44.9% |
| 2008 | NY | 1760 | 3.40 | Unknown | South Asian | 21.6% |
| 2008 | NY | 1750 | 3.40 | Unknown | South Asian | 19.8% |
| 2008 | NJ | 1680 | 3.74 | Unknown | East Asian | 84.0% |
| 2008 | NY | 1620 | 3.50 | Unknown | East Asian | 12.7% |
| 2008 | NY | 1500 | 3.00 | Unknown | Hispanic | 52.4% |
| 2008 | NJ | 1500 | 4.00 | Top 30% | Hispanic | 99.5% |
| 2008 | NY | 1450 | 3.50 | Top 30% | Caucasian | 3.6% |
| 2008 | NY | 1170 | 4.00 | Top 5% | Hispanic | 98.7% |
| 2008 | NY | 31 | 3.30 | Top 30% | Caucasian | 83.6% |
| 2008 | NY | 30 | 4.00 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 91.1% |
| 2008 | NY | 30 | 3.80 | Top 5% | Other | 86.1% |
| 2008 | NY | 27 | 3.70 | Top 10% | East Asian | 50.1% |
| 2008 | (Private) | 27 | 3.15 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 82.9% |
| 2007 | NY | 2320 | 4.00 | Unknown | Caucasian | 99.5% |
| 2007 | NY | 2270 | 3.85 | Unknown | Caucasian | 99.0% |
| 2007 | NY | 2220 | 3.50 | Class Not Ranked | Hispanic | 100.0% |
| 2007 | NY | 2220 | 3.70 | Unknown | East Asian | 97.6% |
| 2007 | NY | 2190 | 3.90 | Unknown | Other | 98.1% |
| 2007 | FL | 1990 | 3.77 | Unknown | Caucasian | 99.0% |
| 2007 | NY | 1900 | 3.60 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 57.3% |
| 2007 | CA | 1880 | 3.67 | Unknown | Other | 96.6% |
| 2007 | NY | 1830 | 3.40 | Top 5% | None Indicated | 30.0% |
| 2007 | NY | 1670 | 3.00 | Top 40% | None Indicated | 6.8% |
| 2007 | NY | 1410 | 2.80 | Top 30% | South Asian | 0.3% |
| 2006 | NY | 1960 | 3.90 | Top 5% | African-American | 99.7% |
| |