Binghamton University Applications and Decisions
Below is a list of applicants who have demonstrated interest in Binghamton University. Our best formula
for this college is based on
126 members who were accepted or rejected. The formula
has a college admissions prediction accuracy of
87%?.
Because not all members have filled out the most recent version of our survey, some predictions are made based on
less-accurate models. Those are noted with an asterisk (*) next to their prediction.
This is a very popular school, so we're only showing you profiles that have received an admissions decision. If you
want to see all applicants to this school,
click here (caution: the page will take awhile to load).
|
| 2010 | CA | 2190 | 3.66 | Top 15% | Caucasian | 99.9% |
| 2009 | NY | 2070 | 3.19 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 74.2% |
| 2009 | NY | 2020 | 3.00 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 52.7% |
| 2009 | NY | 1950 | 3.24 | Class Not Ranked | Middle-Eastern | 51.7% |
| 2009 | NJ | 1930 | 3.10 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 91.5% |
| 2009 | NY | 1290 | 3.48 | Top 40% | African-American | 36.2% |
| 2009 | NY | 29 | 3.75 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 80.9% |
| 2008 | RI | 1930 | 3.00 | Unknown | Caucasian | 89.3% |
|
| 2010 | (Private) | 2270 | 3.92 | Top 2% | Caucasian | 99.9% |
| 2010 | NH | 2070 | 3.73 | Top 10% | South Asian | 99.4% |
| 2010 | (Private) | 2050 | 3.90 | Top 1% | Caucasian | 91.3% |
| 2010 | XX | 1990 | 3.91 | Salutatorian | East Asian | 99.1% |
| 2010 | PA | 1990 | 4.00 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 99.3% |
| 2010 | MA | 1910 | 3.40 | Top 40% | East Asian | 96.9% |
| 2010 | NJ | 1900 | 3.71 | Class Not Ranked | East Asian | 97.4% |
| 2010 | CT | 1880 | 3.89 | Top 15% | South Asian | 98.0% |
| 2010 | MA | 1810 | 3.40 | Class Not Ranked | East Asian | 88.2% |
| 2009 | NY | 2300 | 3.84 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 99.2% |
| 2009 | NY | 2290 | 3.76 | Class Not Ranked | East Asian | 98.9% |
| 2009 | NY | 2250 | 3.50 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 97.1% |
| 2009 | NY | 2250 | 3.80 | Class Not Ranked | South Asian | 98.6% |
| 2009 | NY | 2230 | 3.90 | Valedictorian | None Indicated | 98.2% |
| 2009 | NY | 2200 | 3.50 | Top 30% | Caucasian | 98.1% |
| 2009 | NY | 2200 | 3.41 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 93.7% |
| 2009 | (Private) | 2200 | 3.30 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 99.5% |
| 2009 | XX | 2190 | 3.71 | Class Not Ranked | Other | 99.8% |
| 2009 | NY | 2170 | 4.00 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 97.8% |
| 2009 | NY | 2150 | 3.48 | Class Not Ranked | Middle-Eastern | 92.6% |
| 2009 | NY | 2140 | 3.54 | Top 20% | Other | 93.5% |
| 2009 | NJ | 2130 | 3.46 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 99.4% |
| 2009 | NY | 2110 | 3.70 | Class Not Ranked | East Asian | 94.7% |
| 2009 | NY | 2110 | 3.96 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 96.9% |
| 2009 | NY | 2110 | 3.52 | Unknown | African-American | 99.9% |
| 2009 | NY | 2110 | 3.80 | Class Not Ranked | East Asian | 95.0% |
| 2009 | NY | 2110 | 3.70 | Top 5% | Hispanic | 99.9% |
| 2009 | NY | 2110 | 3.60 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 91.2% |
| 2009 | NY | 2080 | 3.99 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 95.0% |
| 2009 | NY | 2070 | 3.87 | Class Not Ranked | East Asian | 94.0% |
| 2009 | NY | 2070 | 3.40 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 82.9% |
| 2009 | (Private) | 2070 | 3.70 | Top 5% | South Asian | 89.4% |
| 2009 | NY | 2070 | 3.85 | Top 20% | East Asian | 94.3% |
| 2009 | NY | 2060 | 3.70 | Class Not Ranked | South Asian | 90.4% |
| 2009 | NY | 2060 | 3.25 | Class Not Ranked | Middle-Eastern | 75.4% |
| 2009 | NY | 2050 | 3.84 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 92.3% |
| 2009 | NJ | 2050 | 3.60 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 99.1% |
| 2009 | NY | 2010 | 3.90 | Top 5% | Other | 88.8% |
| 2009 | NY | 2010 | 3.80 | Top 10% | Hispanic | 99.8% |
| 2009 | RI | 1990 | 3.60 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 98.5% |
| 2009 | XX | 1980 | 3.95 | Top 1% | East Asian | 99.1% |
| 2009 | NY | 1970 | 3.60 | Top 10% | Hispanic | 99.6% |
| 2009 | NY | 1960 | 3.70 | Top 10% | African-American | 99.6% |
| 2009 | NY | 1960 | 3.80 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 79.4% |
| 2009 | NY | 1950 | 3.84 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 87.2% |
| 2009 | NY | 1940 | 4.00 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 97.4% |
| 2009 | NY | 1940 | 4.00 | Top 10% | None Indicated | 97.2% |
| 2009 | MA | 1940 | 3.27 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 95.2% |
| 2009 | NY | 1930 | 3.90 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 80.6% |
| 2009 | NY | 1920 | 3.80 | Unknown | East Asian | 76.6% |
| 2009 | NJ | 1920 | 3.60 | Class Not Ranked | Other | 97.2% |
| 2009 | CT | 1910 | 3.20 | Unknown | African-American | 99.9% |
| 2009 | NY | 1900 | 3.84 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 73.0% |
| 2009 | NY | 1870 | 4.00 | Top 10% | African-American | 99.6% |
| 2009 | NY | 1860 | 3.40 | Unknown | Caucasian | 40.9% |
| 2009 | NY | 1810 | 3.85 | Top 1% | Hispanic | 98.8% |
| 2009 | CT | 1810 | 3.57 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 91.2% |
| 2009 | NY | 1800 | 3.90 | Top 1% | East Asian | 70.7% |
| 2009 | CT | 1790 | 3.00 | Top 30% | South Asian | 75.8% |
| 2009 | MA | 1780 | 3.05 | Class Not Ranked | African-American | 99.5% |
| 2009 | NY | 1780 | 3.80 | Top 20% | East Asian | 49.5% |
| 2009 | XX | 1710 | 3.30 | Top 40% | East Asian | 79.3% |
| 2009 | NJ | 1450 | 3.30 | Top 40% | Middle-Eastern | 59.1% |
| 2009 | NY | 1290 | 3.50 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 64.0% |
| 2009 | NY | 32 | 3.82 | Top 20% | African-American | 100.0% |
| 2009 | MO | 29 | 3.78 | Top 10% | African-American | 100.0% |
| 2009 | NY | 29 | 3.70 | Unknown | Caucasian | 77.1% |
| 2009 | FL | 27 | 3.35 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 87.8% |
| 2008 | NY | 2280 | 4.00 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 99.3% |
| 2008 | NY | 2190 | 4.00 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 98.2% |
| 2008 | NY | 2160 | 3.90 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 97.7% |
| 2008 | NY | 2140 | 3.80 | Top 5% | South Asian | 95.3% |
| 2008 | NY | 2130 | 3.89 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 99.0% |
| 2008 | (Private) | 2120 | 3.94 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 99.8% |
| 2008 | NJ | 2110 | 3.87 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 99.7% |
| 2008 | NY | 2080 | 3.30 | Class Not Ranked | South Asian | 80.4% |
| 2008 | NJ | 2060 | 3.81 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 99.5% |
| 2008 | NY | 2060 | 3.70 | Unknown | Middle-Eastern | 90.4% |
| 2008 | NY | 2050 | 3.50 | Unknown | African-American | 99.8% |
| 2008 | NY | 2040 | 3.80 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 95.4% |
| 2008 | NY | 2000 | 3.65 | Top 20% | None Indicated | 84.1% |
| 2008 | NY | 2000 | 3.50 | Top 20% | Hispanic | 99.7% |
| 2008 | NY | 1960 | 3.80 | Top 5% | East Asian | 79.4% |
| 2008 | NY | 1920 | 3.63 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 66.0% |
| 2008 | NY | 1910 | 3.80 | Top 20% | East Asian | 76.9% |
| 2008 | NY | 1890 | 3.80 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 86.1% |
| 2008 | TX | 1880 | 3.55 | Top 40% | Caucasian | 97.2% |
| 2008 | NY | 1770 | 4.00 | Unknown | Hispanic | 99.5% |
| 2008 | NY | 1680 | 3.89 | Top 30% | None Indicated | 37.5% |
| 2008 | FL | 1600 | 3.85 | Top 5% | African-American | 99.5% |
| 2008 | XX | 1540 | 3.97 | Top 10% | East Asian | 69.6% |
| 2008 | NY | 32 | 3.60 | Top 10% | Hispanic | 99.9% |
| 2008 | NY | 31 | 3.64 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 89.8% |
| 2008 | NY | 29 | 3.70 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 75.3% |
| 2008 | NY | 27 | 3.75 | Top 5% | African-American | 98.8% |
| 2007 | (Private) | 2400 | 3.70 | Unknown | Caucasian | 99.5% |
| 2007 | NY | 2270 | 3.75 | Unknown | Caucasian | 98.7% |
| 2007 | NY | 2210 | 3.57 | Unknown | Caucasian | 96.5% |
| 2007 | NY | 2060 | 3.00 | Unknown | Caucasian | 64.1% |
| 2007 | (Private) | 1900 | 3.83 | Unknown | Caucasian | 74.4% |
| 2006 | NY | 2180 | 4.00 | Top 1% | Caucasian | 97.9% |
| 2002 | NY | 2400 | 4.00 | Valedictorian | Caucasian | 99.7% |
|
|
| 2009 | NY | 2270 | 3.92 | Top 2% | Caucasian | 98.9% |
| 2009 | (Private) | 2090 | 3.70 | Class Not Ranked | East Asian | 92.6% |
| 2009 | NY | 2040 | 3.50 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 81.0% |
| 2009 | NY | 2040 | 3.50 | Unknown | Caucasian | 82.5% |
| 2009 | NY | 2000 | 3.80 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 86.3% |
| 2009 | NY | 1930 | 3.40 | Top 30% | East Asian | 63.9% |
| 2009 | NY | 1910 | 3.60 | Class Not Ranked | East Asian | 64.7% |
| 2009 | NY | 1860 | 3.40 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 40.9% |
| 2009 | NY | 1790 | 4.00 | Top 1% | East Asian | 55.2% |
| 2009 | NY | 1630 | 2.99 | Top 40% | Caucasian | 4.6% |
| 2009 | NJ | 1620 | 3.55 | Top 10% | South Asian | 62.9% |
| 2009 | NY | 1600 | 3.47 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 7.5% |
| 2009 | NY | 1560 | 3.50 | Top 5% | South Asian | 4.3% |
| 2009 | NY | 1550 | 3.00 | Unknown | South Asian | 1.4% |
| 2009 | (Private) | 1450 | 3.30 | Top 30% | Caucasian | 1.6% |
| 2009 | CT | 1420 | 2.77 | Top 30% | Caucasian | 5.3% |
| 2009 | NY | 1320 | 2.89 | Top 20% | Native American | 14.8% |
| 2009 | NY | 1310 | 3.40 | Top 20% | Hispanic | 27.4% |
| 2009 | NY | 1310 | 3.40 | Top 10% | Hispanic | 23.6% |
| 2009 | NY | 28 | 3.60 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 62.5% |
| 2008 | NJ | 1630 | 3.08 | Bottom 40% | Caucasian | 60.8% |
| 2007 | NY | 2260 | 3.63 | Unknown | East Asian | 98.0% |
| |