University at Albany, SUNY Applications and Decisions
Below is a list of applicants who have demonstrated interest in University at Albany, SUNY. Our best formula for this college is based on members who were accepted or rejected. The formula has a college admissions prediction accuracy of %?. Because not all members have filled out the most recent version of our survey, some predictions are made based on less-accurate models. Those are noted with an asterisk (*) next to their prediction.
Recent Admissions Results from 279 Members |
|||||||
Member |
Year Entering |
State |
SAT/ACT |
GPA |
Class Rank |
Ethnic Heritage |
Prediction ? |
| Accepted And Attending (1) | |||||||
| 2009 | NY | 1850 | 3.30 | Top 20% | None Indicated | ||
| Accepted (68) | |||||||
| 2011 | NY | 2060 | 3.54 | Top 15% | Other | ||
| 2010 | NY | 2250 | 3.80 | Top 15% | Caucasian | ||
| 2010 | NY | 2130 | 3.52 | Unknown | East Asian | ||
| 2010 | NY | 2090 | 3.37 | Unknown | East Asian | ||
| 2010 | NY | 2070 | 3.80 | Top 10% | Hispanic | ||
| 2010 | NY | 1980 | 3.60 | Top 15% | Caucasian | ||
| 2010 | NY | 1950 | 3.52 | Class Not Ranked | African-American | ||
| 2010 | NY | 1860 | 3.18 | Top 40% | Caucasian | ||
| 2010 | NY | 1840 | 3.20 | Class Not Ranked | Hispanic | ||
| 2010 | NY | 1820 | 3.60 | Top 35% | Caucasian | ||
| 2010 | NY | 1820 | 3.00 | Bottom 50% | Hispanic | ||
| 2010 | NY | 1810 | 3.56 | Top 20% | Caucasian | ||
| 2010 | (Private) | 1790 | 3.75 | Top 10% | East Asian | ||
| 2010 | NJ | 1780 | 3.50 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | ||
| 2010 | NJ | 1730 | 3.40 | Top 30% | Caucasian | ||
| 2010 | NY | 1720 | 3.30 | Top 15% | Hispanic | ||
| 2010 | NY | 1680 | 3.72 | Top 25% | Caucasian | ||
| 2010 | NY | 1680 | 3.40 | Bottom 50% | Caucasian | ||
| 2010 | NY | 1670 | 4.00 | Top 1% | African-American | ||
| 2010 | NY | 1640 | 3.70 | Top 15% | Caucasian | ||
| 2010 | NY | 1580 | 3.40 | Top 25% | East Asian | ||
| 2010 | NY | 1580 | 3.44 | Top 15% | Native American | ||
| 2010 | FL | 1520 | 3.75 | Top 10% | Hispanic | ||
| 2010 | NY | 1400 | 3.80 | Top 10% | Caucasian | ||
| 2010 | NY | 1390 | 3.40 | Top 10% | Caucasian | ||
| 2010 | NY | 29 | 3.00 | Class Not Ranked | East Asian | ||
| 2010 | NY | 29 | 2.80 | Class Not Ranked | South Asian | ||
| 2010 | NY | 28 | 3.58 | Top 25% | Caucasian | ||
| 2009 | NY | 2110 | 3.60 | Top 10% | Caucasian | ||
| 2009 | NY | 2060 | 3.25 | Class Not Ranked | Middle-Eastern | ||
| 2009 | NY | 2020 | 3.00 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | ||
| 2009 | NY | 2000 | 3.80 | Top 10% | Caucasian | ||
| 2009 | NY | 1950 | 3.60 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | ||
| 2009 | (Private) | 1900 | 3.50 | Unknown | Caucasian | ||
| 2009 | NY | 1870 | 3.90 | Top 10% | Caucasian | ||
| 2009 | NY | 1860 | 3.40 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | ||
| 2009 | NY | 1850 | 3.64 | Top 30% | South Asian | ||
| 2009 | NY | 1840 | 3.66 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | ||
| 2009 | NY | 1830 | 2.80 | Unknown | Caucasian | ||
| 2009 | NY | 1790 | 4.00 | Top 1% | East Asian | ||
| 2009 | NY | 1770 | 2.90 | Unknown | Caucasian | ||
| 2009 | NY | 1710 | 3.00 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | ||
| 2009 | NY | 1660 | 3.26 | Top 25% | Hispanic | ||
| 2009 | NY | 1600 | 3.00 | Unknown | Caucasian | ||
| 2009 | NY | 1600 | 3.47 | Top 20% | Caucasian | ||
| 2009 | CT | 1590 | 3.00 | Bottom 50% | Caucasian | ||
| 2009 | NY | 1500 | 3.50 | Top 5% | African-American | ||
| 2009 | NY | 1290 | 3.50 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | ||
| 2009 | NY | 31 | 3.60 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | ||
| 2009 | NY | 28 | 3.60 | Top 20% | Caucasian | ||
| 2008 | NY | 2340 | 4.00 | Salutatorian | Caucasian | ||
| 2008 | NY | 2220 | 3.75 | Top 10% | Caucasian | ||
| 2008 | NY | 2010 | 3.65 | Unknown | Caucasian | ||
| 2008 | NY | 2000 | 3.65 | Top 20% | None Indicated | ||
| 2008 | NY | 1990 | 4.00 | Top 20% | Caucasian | ||
| 2008 | NY | 1990 | 3.70 | Top 20% | Caucasian | ||
| 2008 | NY | 1920 | 3.63 | Top 10% | Caucasian | ||
| 2008 | GA | 1910 | 3.72 | Top 10% | Caucasian | ||
| 2008 | NY | 1890 | 3.80 | Top 5% | Caucasian | ||
| 2008 | NY | 1820 | 3.30 | Top 30% | Caucasian | ||
| 2008 | NY | 1730 | 3.50 | Class Not Ranked | African-American | ||
| 2008 | NY | 1720 | 3.50 | Top 30% | Caucasian | ||
| 2008 | NY | 1680 | 3.89 | Top 30% | None Indicated | ||
| 2008 | MA | 1630 | 3.60 | Unknown | East Asian | ||
| 2008 | NY | 1550 | 3.50 | Top 30% | Caucasian | ||
| 2008 | NY | 31 | 3.64 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | ||
| 2008 | NY | 29 | 3.70 | Top 10% | Caucasian | ||
| 2007 | NY | 2210 | 3.57 | Unknown | Caucasian | ||
| Waitlisted (3) | |||||||
| 2009 | (Private) | 1450 | 3.30 | Top 30% | Caucasian | ||
| 2008 | NY | 1590 | 3.30 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | ||
| 2008 | NY | 1480 | 2.80 | Top 30% | Hispanic | ||
| Denied Admission (4) | |||||||
| 2009 | NY | 2020 | 2.40 | Bottom 20% | Native American | ||
| 2009 | NY | 1540 | 2.70 | Bottom 40% | Caucasian | ||
| 2009 | NY | 1400 | 3.00 | Top 30% | Caucasian | ||
| 2009 | NY | 1310 | 3.40 | Top 10% | Hispanic | ||
| Applied (54) | |||||||
| 2011 | NJ | 1700 | 2.74 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | ||
| 2010 | NY | 2140 | 3.79 | Top 10% | Hispanic | ||
| 2010 | NY | 2010 | 3.20 | Bottom 50% | South Asian | ||
| 2010 | NY | 2000 | 4.00 | Top 10% | Caucasian | ||
| 2010 | NY | 1970 | 3.68 | Top 15% | Caucasian | ||
| 2010 | CT | 1890 | 3.40 | Unknown | Caucasian | ||
| 2010 | NY | 1840 | 3.30 | Unknown | Caucasian | ||
| 2010 | NY | 1780 | 2.90 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | ||
| 2010 | NY | 1710 | 3.70 | Unknown | Caucasian | ||
| 2010 | NY | 1700 | 2.80 | Class Not Ranked | South Asian | ||
| 2010 | NY | 1690 | 3.40 | Unknown | Caucasian | ||
| 2010 | NY | 1650 | 3.50 | Bottom 50% | Caucasian | ||
| 2010 | NY | 1650 | 3.20 | Top 15% | Caucasian | ||
| 2010 | NY | 1620 | 3.70 | Top 1% | Hispanic | ||
| 2010 | NY | 1600 | 3.30 | Top 10% | Hispanic | ||
| 2010 | VT | 1590 | 3.40 | Top 25% | Caucasian | ||
| 2010 | NY | 1550 | 3.40 | Unknown | East Asian | ||
| 2010 | NY | 1530 | 3.58 | Top 35% | African-American | ||
| 2010 | NY | 1500 | 4.00 | Unknown | East Asian | ||
| 2010 | NY | 1390 | 3.00 | Bottom 50% | African-American | ||
| 2010 | NY | 1390 | 3.30 | Class Not Ranked | Hispanic | ||
| 2010 | NY | 1380 | 3.20 | Unknown | Hispanic | ||
| 2009 | NY | 2240 | 3.80 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | ||
| 2009 | NY | 2170 | 3.80 | Top 5% | Caucasian | ||
| 2009 | NY | 2090 | 3.44 | Class Not Ranked | Middle-Eastern | ||
| 2009 | NY | 2000 | 2.80 | Class Not Ranked | Hispanic | ||
| 2009 | NY | 1950 | 3.24 | Class Not Ranked | Middle-Eastern | ||
| 2009 | NY | 1910 | 4.00 | Unknown | South Asian | ||
| 2009 | NY | 1860 | 3.11 | Top 20% | Caucasian | ||
| 2009 | NY | 1860 | 3.20 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | ||
| 2009 | NY | 1680 | 3.30 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | ||
| 2009 | NY | 1620 | 3.80 | Top 10% | Caucasian | ||
| 2009 | NY | 1580 | 3.00 | Bottom 50% | Caucasian | ||
| 2009 | NY | 1430 | 3.30 | Top 30% | Caucasian | ||
| 2009 | NY | 28 | 3.40 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | ||
| 2009 | NY | 27 | 3.60 | Class Not Ranked | None Indicated | ||
| 2009 | XX | 26 | 3.95 | Top 10% | Caucasian | ||
| 2008 | NY | 2090 | 4.00 | Valedictorian | Caucasian | ||
| 2008 | NY | 1990 | 4.00 | Top 20% | Caucasian | ||
| 2008 | NY | 1960 | 3.80 | Top 5% | East Asian | ||
| 2008 | NY | 1820 | 3.37 | Top 20% | Other | ||
| 2008 | NY | 1770 | 4.00 | Unknown | Hispanic | ||
| 2008 | NY | 1770 | 3.30 | Unknown | Caucasian | ||
| 2008 | NY | 1740 | 2.44 | Unknown | Caucasian | ||
| 2008 | NY | 1710 | 3.40 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | ||
| 2008 | NY | 1670 | 3.70 | Top 30% | Caucasian | ||
| 2008 | NY | 1650 | 3.30 | Bottom 50% | Caucasian | ||
| 2008 | MA | 1540 | 3.43 | Top 20% | Caucasian | ||
| 2008 | NY | 1450 | 3.50 | Top 30% | Caucasian | ||
| 2008 | NY | 1240 | 2.60 | Unknown | Caucasian | ||
| 2008 | AK | 1200 | 2.00 | Top 1% | None Indicated | ||
| 2008 | NY | 35 | 4.00 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | ||
| 2008 | NY | 26 | 2.88 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | ||
| 2007 | NY | 1680 | 3.65 | Top 5% | Caucasian | ||
| Applying (144) | |||||||
| 2012 | NY | 2260 | 3.75 | Top 5% | Caucasian | ||
| 2012 | NY | 1820 | 2.70 | Bottom 50% | Caucasian | ||
| 2011 | MD | 2190 | 3.55 | Top 15% | East Asian | ||
| 2011 | (Private) | 2150 | 3.92 | Top 1% | Caucasian | ||
| 2011 | FL | 2120 | 3.65 | Top 15% | Caucasian | ||
| 2011 | NY | 2100 | 3.20 | Unknown | Hispanic | ||
| 2011 | CA | 2100 | 3.50 | Top 25% | East Asian | ||
| 2011 | AZ | 2100 | 3.40 | Unknown | Caucasian | ||
| 2011 | NY | 2020 | 3.60 | Top 20% | African-American | ||
| 2011 | NY | 2010 | 3.68 | Top 20% | Caucasian | ||
| 2011 | NY | 1870 | 3.68 | Class Not Ranked | South Asian | ||
| 2011 | NY | 1850 | 3.43 | Top 15% | Hispanic | ||
| 2011 | NY | 1810 | 4.00 | Unknown | Middle-Eastern | ||
| 2011 | TX | 1800 | 3.91 | Top 5% | South Asian | ||
| 2011 | NY | 1800 | 3.50 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | ||
| 2011 | NY | 1770 | 3.94 | Unknown | Caucasian | ||
| 2011 | NY | 1760 | 3.40 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | ||
| 2011 | NY | 1760 | 3.67 | Top 15% | Caucasian | ||
| 2011 | NY | 1720 | 3.56 | Unknown | Caucasian | ||
| 2011 | NY | 1720 | 3.30 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | ||
| 2011 | NY | 1650 | 3.30 | Unknown | Caucasian | ||
| 2011 | NY | 1600 | 3.80 | Top 15% | Caucasian | ||
| 2011 | PA | 1550 | 3.21 | Unknown | East Asian | ||
| 2011 | NJ | 1480 | 3.50 | Top 35% | Caucasian | ||
| 2011 | SC | 1370 | 3.36 | Top 40% | African-American | ||
| 2011 | NY | 990 | 3.64 | Top 15% | Caucasian | ||
| 2011 | CA | 30 | 3.20 | Unknown | Caucasian | ||
| 2011 | NY | 29 | 3.38 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | ||
| 2011 | NY | 25 | 3.20 | Unknown | Caucasian | ||
| 2011 | CA | 23 | 2.86 | Unknown | Other | ||
| 2010 | NY | 2190 | 3.95 | Top 10% | Caucasian | ||
| 2010 | NY | 2160 | 1.90 | Bottom 40% | Caucasian | ||
| 2010 | NY | 2120 | 3.60 | Unknown | Caucasian | ||
| 2010 | NY | 2080 | 3.36 | Bottom 50% | Caucasian | ||
| 2010 | NY | 2050 | 3.80 | Class Not Ranked | Hispanic | ||
| 2010 | NY | 2010 | 3.10 | Class Not Ranked | South Asian | ||
| 2010 | NY | 2010 | 2.83 | Unknown | Caucasian | ||
| 2010 | NY | 1950 | 3.72 | Top 10% | Other | ||
| 2010 | NY | 1940 | 3.65 | Top 20% | South Asian | ||
| 2010 | NY | 1940 | 3.84 | Top 15% | Caucasian | ||
| 2010 | NY | 1930 | 3.30 | Unknown | Caucasian | ||
| 2010 | NY | 1920 | 2.70 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | ||
| 2010 | NY | 1920 | 3.69 | Top 20% | Caucasian | ||
| 2010 | NY | 1910 | 2.80 | Bottom 30% | Caucasian | ||
| 2010 | NY | 1900 | 3.60 | Top 15% | Hispanic | ||
| 2010 | NY | 1890 | 3.50 | Class Not Ranked | Hispanic | ||
| 2010 | NY | 1880 | 3.60 | Top 10% | Caucasian | ||
| 2010 | NY | 1870 | 4.00 | Top 5% | Caucasian | ||
| 2010 | NY | 1840 | 3.20 | Unknown | Caucasian | ||
| 2010 | NY | 1800 | 3.40 | Class Not Ranked | Hispanic | ||
| 2010 | NJ | 1800 | 3.60 | Top 10% | Other | ||
| 2010 | MA | 1760 | 2.46 | Bottom 50% | Caucasian | ||
| 2010 | NY | 1750 | 3.73 | Top 10% | Caucasian | ||
| 2010 | NY | 1700 | 3.70 | Top 20% | Caucasian | ||
| 2010 | NY | 1700 | 3.30 | Unknown | East Asian | ||
| 2010 | NY | 1690 | 2.60 | Class Not Ranked | East Asian | ||
| 2010 | NY | 1680 | 3.26 | Unknown | East Asian | ||
| 2010 | NY | 1660 | 3.70 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | ||
| 2010 | NY | 1650 | 3.00 | Top 25% | Caucasian | ||
| 2010 | NY | 1640 | 3.40 | Top 40% | African-American | ||
| 2010 | CT | 1640 | 3.09 | Bottom 40% | Native American | ||
| 2010 | NY | 1630 | 3.00 | Unknown | Caucasian | ||
| 2010 | NY | 1620 | 3.50 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | ||
| 2010 | NY | 1620 | 2.70 | Unknown | African-American | ||
| 2010 | NY | 1620 | 3.48 | Unknown | East Asian | ||
| 2010 | NY | 1560 | 3.40 | Top 10% | Caucasian | ||
| 2010 | NY | 1550 | 3.58 | Top 10% | Caucasian | ||
| 2010 | XX | 1550 | 2.70 | Class Not Ranked | East Asian | ||
| 2010 | NY | 1490 | 3.00 | Top 25% | Hispanic | ||
| 2010 | (Private) | 1490 | 3.32 | Class Not Ranked | Hispanic | ||
| 2010 | XX | 1490 | 3.00 | Bottom 40% | Hispanic | ||
| 2010 | NY | 1440 | 3.36 | Top 40% | South Asian | ||
| 2010 | NY | 1390 | 3.50 | Class Not Ranked | African-American | ||
| 2010 | NY | 1380 | 3.40 | Unknown | Caucasian | ||
| 2010 | NY | 1370 | 2.30 | Bottom 20% | Caucasian | ||
| 2010 | NY | 1290 | 3.20 | Bottom 40% | Caucasian | ||
| 2010 | NY | 1290 | 3.40 | Unknown | Caucasian | ||
| 2010 | NY | 1260 | 3.00 | Unknown | Hispanic | ||
| 2010 | NY | 1180 | 3.30 | Bottom 40% | Caucasian | ||
| 2010 | NY | 940 | 2.60 | Bottom 50% | Caucasian | ||
| 2010 | NY | 31 | 3.70 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | ||
| 2010 | NY | 27 | 3.50 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | ||
| 2010 | NY | 27 | 3.50 | Top 20% | Caucasian | ||
| 2010 | NY | 25 | 2.90 | Class Not Ranked | Middle-Eastern | ||
| 2010 | KS | 24 | 2.80 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | ||
| 2010 | TX | 18 | 3.30 | Top 30% | Hispanic | ||
| 2009 | NY | 2310 | 4.00 | Unknown | Caucasian | ||
| 2009 | NY | 2070 | 3.40 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | ||
| 2009 | NY | 2070 | 3.19 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | ||
| 2009 | NY | 1980 | 3.30 | Class Not Ranked | Hispanic | ||
| 2009 | CA | 1940 | 3.10 | Unknown | Caucasian | ||
| 2009 | NY | 1900 | 3.10 | Bottom 50% | Caucasian | ||
| 2009 | NY | 1860 | 3.43 | Top 10% | Caucasian | ||
| 2009 | NY | 1850 | 2.70 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | ||
| 2009 | NY | 1820 | 3.70 | Top 5% | South Asian | ||
| 2009 | (Private) | 1810 | 3.75 | Top 20% | South Asian | ||
| 2009 | NY | 1810 | 3.81 | Top 10% | Caucasian | ||
| 2009 | NJ | 1800 | 3.24 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | ||
| 2009 | NJ | 1790 | 3.00 | Top 30% | Caucasian | ||
| 2009 | NY | 1790 | 2.50 | Bottom 40% | South Asian | ||
| 2009 | NY | 1770 | 3.20 | Top 10% | Caucasian | ||
| 2009 | NY | 1770 | 3.40 | Top 10% | Caucasian | ||
| 2009 | NY | 1750 | 3.80 | Top 10% | East Asian | ||
| 2009 | NY | 1750 | 3.25 | Class Not Ranked | Hispanic | ||
| 2009 | NY | 1750 | 3.45 | Unknown | Caucasian | ||
| 2009 | NY | 1710 | 3.50 | Unknown | Caucasian | ||
| 2009 | NJ | 1700 | 3.00 | Unknown | East Asian | ||
| 2009 | NY | 1700 | 3.00 | Top 40% | Caucasian | ||
| 2009 | NY | 1690 | 2.40 | Unknown | Hispanic | ||
| 2009 | NY | 1690 | 3.70 | Top 20% | Hispanic | ||
| 2009 | NY | 1640 | 3.20 | Top 40% | Caucasian | ||
| 2009 | NJ | 1620 | 3.31 | Top 40% | East Asian | ||
| 2009 | NY | 1600 | 3.50 | Top 20% | Caucasian | ||
| 2009 | (Private) | 1600 | 3.20 | Top 40% | Caucasian | ||
| 2009 | NY | 1580 | 3.60 | Top 30% | African-American | ||
| 2009 | NY | 1570 | 3.70 | Top 30% | Caucasian | ||
| 2009 | NY | 1530 | 3.00 | Top 30% | Caucasian | ||
| 2009 | NY | 1510 | 3.50 | Top 30% | African-American | ||
| 2009 | NY | 1420 | 3.00 | Unknown | African-American | ||
| 2009 | NY | 1400 | 3.30 | Bottom 40% | East Asian | ||
| 2009 | NY | 1240 | 3.20 | Bottom 50% | Caucasian | ||
| 2009 | NY | 600 | 4.00 | Valedictorian | African-American | ||
| 2009 | NY | 27 | 3.74 | Top 20% | Caucasian | ||
| 2009 | MA | 24 | 2.80 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | ||
| 2008 | NY | 2150 | 3.85 | Top 5% | None Indicated | ||
| 2008 | NY | 2100 | 3.63 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | ||
| 2008 | NY | 2040 | 3.60 | Top 20% | Caucasian | ||
| 2008 | NY | 1990 | 2.90 | Unknown | Caucasian | ||
| 2008 | NY | 1950 | 3.90 | Top 1% | East Asian | ||
| 2008 | NY | 1870 | 3.10 | Top 30% | Caucasian | ||
| 2008 | VA | 1870 | 3.60 | Top 20% | Hispanic | ||
| 2008 | NY | 1870 | 2.76 | Unknown | Caucasian | ||
| 2008 | NY | 1800 | 3.40 | Top 20% | Caucasian | ||
| 2008 | NY | 1740 | 3.65 | Top 20% | Caucasian | ||
| 2008 | NY | 1670 | 2.90 | Unknown | Caucasian | ||
| 2008 | NY | 1650 | 3.50 | Top 40% | Caucasian | ||
| 2008 | NY | 1640 | 3.00 | Bottom 40% | Caucasian | ||
| 2008 | NY | 1630 | 3.00 | Top 40% | Caucasian | ||
| 2008 | NY | 1600 | 2.30 | Unknown | Caucasian | ||
| 2008 | CT | 1470 | 3.11 | Unknown | East Asian | ||
| 2008 | NE | 30 | 3.90 | Top 5% | Caucasian | ||
| 2008 | NY | 27 | 3.70 | Top 10% | East Asian | ||
| 2007 | NY | 2030 | 3.50 | Top 10% | South Asian | ||
| 2007 | NY | 1830 | 3.40 | Top 5% | None Indicated | ||