Baylor University Applications and Decisions
Below is a list of applicants who have demonstrated interest in Baylor University. Our best formula
for this college is based on
55 members who were accepted or rejected. The formula
has a college admissions prediction accuracy of
100%?.
Because not all members have filled out the most recent version of our survey, some predictions are made based on
less-accurate models. Those are noted with an asterisk (*) next to their prediction.
This is a very popular school, so we're only showing you profiles that have received an admissions decision. If you
want to see all applicants to this school,
click here (caution: the page will take awhile to load).
|
| 2010 | GA | 1880 | 3.68 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 81.0% |
| 2009 | SC | 1630 | 2.99 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 49.9% |
|
| 2012 | TX | 2160 | 3.69 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 86.0% |
| 2010 | TX | 2210 | 3.80 | Top 10% | South Asian | 91.6% |
| 2010 | TX | 2110 | 3.50 | Top 15% | Caucasian | 83.3% |
| 2010 | TX | 2100 | 3.50 | Top 20% | South Asian | 84.0% |
| 2010 | TX | 2070 | 3.70 | Top 3% | South Asian | 83.5% |
| 2010 | VA | 2060 | 4.00 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 88.3% |
| 2010 | VA | 2060 | 4.00 | Top 3% | Caucasian | 88.0% |
| 2010 | TX | 2040 | 3.80 | Class Not Ranked | Hispanic | 86.5% |
| 2010 | WA | 2030 | 3.97 | Salutatorian | Caucasian | 87.3% |
| 2010 | SC | 2020 | 3.72 | Top 4% | East Asian | 88.6% |
| 2010 | TX | 1990 | 3.57 | Top 10% | Hispanic | 80.1% |
| 2010 | TX | 1990 | 3.10 | Top 40% | Caucasian | 76.7% |
| 2010 | LA | 1970 | 3.85 | Top 10% | South Asian | 88.4% |
| 2010 | TX | 1940 | 3.95 | Top 2% | Hispanic | 87.3% |
| 2010 | WI | 1930 | 3.60 | Top 20% | South Asian | 80.9% |
| 2010 | TX | 1920 | 3.60 | Top 25% | Caucasian | 84.2% |
| 2010 | TX | 1920 | 3.40 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 76.2% |
| 2010 | TX | 1840 | 3.72 | Top 3% | Hispanic | 76.6% |
| 2010 | TX | 1810 | 3.00 | Top 40% | Caucasian | 67.8% |
| 2010 | FL | 1810 | 3.65 | Top 25% | African-American | 79.8% |
| 2010 | TX | 1800 | 3.50 | Class Not Ranked | South Asian | 72.9% |
| 2010 | CA | 1730 | 3.10 | Top 20% | Hispanic | 60.1% |
| 2010 | GA | 1710 | 3.54 | Top 30% | Hispanic | 80.6% |
| 2010 | AZ | 1710 | 4.00 | Top 15% | Caucasian | 84.4% |
| 2010 | CA | 1710 | 3.14 | Unknown | East Asian | 58.7% |
| 2010 | TX | 1700 | 3.83 | Top 10% | Hispanic | 76.8% |
| 2010 | TX | 1690 | 3.07 | Top 35% | East Asian | 66.3% |
| 2010 | (Private) | 1660 | 3.40 | Top 35% | Hispanic | 78.8% |
| 2010 | MO | 1650 | 3.58 | Top 40% | African-American | 75.5% |
| 2010 | TX | 1630 | 3.20 | Top 15% | African-American | 58.3% |
| 2010 | (Private) | 1600 | 3.00 | Bottom 20% | Hispanic | 69.4% |
| 2010 | (Private) | 35 | 3.97 | Valedictorian | Caucasian | 92.2% |
| 2010 | UT | 34 | 3.87 | Valedictorian | Caucasian | 90.0% |
| 2010 | TX | 33 | 3.80 | Top 30% | East Asian | 91.3% |
| 2010 | TX | 32 | 3.80 | Class Not Ranked | East Asian | 88.4% |
| 2010 | WI | 30 | 3.35 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 77.2% |
| 2010 | TX | 30 | 4.00 | Top 25% | Caucasian | 89.9% |
| 2010 | LA | 30 | 3.83 | Top 2% | African-American | 84.0% |
| 2010 | TX | 29 | 3.40 | Bottom 50% | East Asian | 83.6% |
| 2010 | AR | 29 | 3.40 | Top 15% | Caucasian | 76.2% |
| 2010 | TX | 28 | 3.65 | Top 30% | Caucasian | 82.7% |
| 2010 | TX | 28 | 3.15 | Top 25% | Caucasian | 70.2% |
| 2010 | MI | 28 | 3.29 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 71.1% |
| 2010 | TX | 27 | 3.79 | Top 15% | South Asian | 80.5% |
| 2010 | (Private) | 25 | 3.64 | Top 30% | South Asian | 77.2% |
| 2009 | TX | 2280 | 4.00 | Valedictorian | East Asian | 91.6% |
| 2009 | TX | 2210 | 3.71 | Top 20% | South Asian | 90.5% |
| 2009 | CA | 2170 | 3.49 | Top 35% | None Indicated | 87.9% |
| 2009 | TX | 2130 | 3.38 | Top 5% | East Asian | 79.6% |
| 2009 | CA | 2050 | 3.42 | Unknown | East Asian | 80.0% |
| 2009 | LA | 2000 | 3.10 | Bottom 50% | Caucasian | 79.7% |
| 2009 | TX | 2000 | 3.94 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 87.6% |
| 2009 | TX | 2000 | 3.83 | Top 10% | East Asian | 85.2% |
| 2009 | TX | 1990 | 3.77 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 87.3% |
| 2009 | TX | 1990 | 3.70 | Top 20% | African-American | 84.4% |
| 2009 | RI | 1990 | 3.60 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 81.7% |
| 2009 | TX | 1960 | 3.45 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 85.5% |
| 2009 | (Private) | 1960 | 3.88 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 84.9% |
| 2009 | TX | 1950 | 3.56 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 84.2% |
| 2009 | TX | 1940 | 3.70 | Top 10% | African-American | 81.2% |
| 2009 | TX | 1930 | 3.43 | Top 20% | East Asian | 77.3% |
| 2009 | GA | 1910 | 3.15 | Top 40% | East Asian | 75.0% |
| 2009 | TX | 1900 | 3.50 | Top 20% | East Asian | 77.8% |
| 2009 | TX | 1860 | 3.85 | Top 10% | South Asian | 81.6% |
| 2009 | GA | 1830 | 3.91 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 85.8% |
| 2009 | GA | 1820 | 3.70 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 77.2% |
| 2009 | TX | 1820 | 3.28 | Top 30% | Caucasian | 72.1% |
| 2009 | GA | 1770 | 3.10 | Top 30% | South Asian | 65.0% |
| 2009 | TX | 1700 | 3.60 | Top 30% | Hispanic | 75.4% |
| 2009 | TX | 1650 | 3.14 | Top 40% | African-American | 63.8% |
| 2009 | TX | 1640 | 3.03 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 53.5% |
| 2009 | TX | 1640 | 3.85 | Top 20% | None Indicated | 76.6% |
| 2009 | CO | 1630 | 3.20 | Top 40% | Caucasian | 68.8% |
| 2009 | TX | 1590 | 3.30 | Top 30% | Hispanic | 66.0% |
| 2009 | TX | 1580 | 3.20 | Bottom 50% | Caucasian | 65.4% |
| 2009 | TX | 1570 | 3.37 | Top 30% | Hispanic | 63.7% |
| 2009 | TX | 1520 | 3.58 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 63.0% |
| 2009 | TX | 1320 | 3.70 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 63.7% |
| 2009 | (Private) | 32 | 3.57 | Class Not Ranked | East Asian | 85.1% |
| 2009 | (Private) | 32 | 3.85 | Top 5% | South Asian | 87.7% |
| 2009 | (Private) | 31 | 3.80 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 87.9% |
| 2009 | TX | 27 | 3.55 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 75.3% |
| 2009 | TX | 25 | 3.70 | Top 30% | Caucasian | 78.5% |
| 2009 | AR | 22 | 3.40 | Top 10% | African-American | 57.1% |
| 2008 | (Private) | 2320 | 4.00 | Top 1% | South Asian | 92.3% |
| 2008 | TX | 2270 | 3.75 | Top 1% | East Asian | 88.7% |
| 2008 | TX | 2060 | 3.60 | Top 30% | Caucasian | 86.3% |
| 2008 | TX | 2030 | 3.80 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 85.4% |
| 2008 | TX | 1880 | 3.55 | Top 40% | Caucasian | 82.5% |
| 2008 | TX | 1860 | 4.00 | Top 5% | Hispanic | 83.4% |
| 2008 | TX | 1660 | 3.60 | Top 5% | Hispanic | 66.9% |
| 2008 | (Private) | 26 | 3.96 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 80.4% |
| 2008 | TX | 24 | 3.29 | Top 20% | South Asian | 62.7% |
| 2007 | TX | 2050 | 4.00 | Top 1% | South Asian | 87.4% |
|
|
| 2008 | TX | 1390 | 2.97 | Unknown | Caucasian | 37.5% |
| |