Penn State University Applications and Decisions
Below is a list of applicants who have demonstrated interest in Penn State University. Our best formula
for this college is based on
304 members who were accepted or rejected. The formula
has a college admissions prediction accuracy of
90%?.
Because not all members have filled out the most recent version of our survey, some predictions are made based on
less-accurate models. Those are noted with an asterisk (*) next to their prediction.
This is a very popular school, and you're looking at the whole list. If you
would like to only see completed applications,
click here for a smaller version of this page.
|
| 2010 | PA | 2080 | 3.90 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 100.0% |
| 2010 | PA | 2020 | 3.36 | Top 15% | Caucasian | 92.4% |
| 2010 | PA | 1980 | 3.81 | Top 15% | Caucasian | 96.7% |
| 2010 | PA | 1830 | 3.69 | Top 15% | Caucasian | 92.1% |
| 2010 | PA | 1770 | 3.62 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 92.0% |
| 2010 | PA | 1770 | 3.60 | Top 20% | Hispanic | 100.0% |
| 2010 | MD | 1760 | 3.70 | Unknown | East Asian | 89.8% |
| 2010 | PA | 1650 | 3.57 | Top 25% | Caucasian | 65.2% |
| 2010 | HI | 1350 | 3.75 | Top 10% | African-American | 100.0% |
| 2010 | NJ | 1300 | 3.80 | Top 5% | None Indicated | 98.3% |
| 2009 | PA | 1960 | 3.67 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 95.1% |
| 2009 | (Private) | 1850 | 4.00 | Top 5% | Other | 99.2% |
| 2009 | PA | 1850 | 3.60 | Top 15% | Caucasian | 91.2% |
| 2009 | PA | 1790 | 3.65 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 87.5% |
| 2009 | PA | 1770 | 3.84 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 99.3% |
| 2009 | PA | 1740 | 3.80 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 99.4% |
| 2009 | PA | 1730 | 3.50 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 76.2% |
| 2009 | NJ | 1680 | 3.68 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 98.5% |
| 2009 | VA | 1640 | 3.80 | Class Not Ranked | African-American | 100.0% |
| 2009 | PA | 1590 | 2.99 | Bottom 50% | Caucasian | 4.2% |
| 2009 | CA | 30 | 3.95 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 97.9% |
| 2009 | NJ | 28 | 3.55 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 91.6% |
| 2008 | FL | 1780 | 3.50 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 79.8% |
| 2008 | PA | 1760 | 3.39 | Top 20% | South Asian | 73.8% |
| 2008 | (Private) | 1730 | 3.76 | Top 20% | None Indicated | 88.2% |
| 2008 | PA | 1580 | 3.80 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 77.1% |
| 2006 | TX | 2030 | 3.80 | Top 10% | Other | 98.2% |
|
| 2011 | NY | 1510 | 3.75 | Top 1% | African-American | 100.0% |
| 2010 | PA | 2350 | 3.41 | Top 5% | East Asian | 99.2% |
| 2010 | XX | 2330 | 3.89 | Top 1% | East Asian | 99.8% |
| 2010 | CT | 2300 | 3.87 | Top 4% | East Asian | 99.7% |
| 2010 | PA | 2290 | 3.50 | Top 25% | Caucasian | 96.0% |
| 2010 | PA | 2280 | 3.89 | Top 1% | East Asian | 99.8% |
| 2010 | NJ | 2270 | 3.88 | Class Not Ranked | South Asian | 99.4% |
| 2010 | NY | 2270 | 3.64 | Class Not Ranked | South Asian | 98.6% |
| 2010 | VA | 2260 | 4.00 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 99.6% |
| 2010 | MD | 2260 | 3.86 | Top 2% | Caucasian | 100.0% |
| 2010 | PA | 2240 | 3.83 | Valedictorian | Caucasian | 99.7% |
| 2010 | PA | 2240 | 4.00 | Valedictorian | Caucasian | 99.8% |
| 2010 | PA | 2240 | 3.35 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 96.9% |
| 2010 | PA | 2240 | 3.90 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 99.4% |
| 2010 | PA | 2240 | 3.85 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 99.6% |
| 2010 | PA | 2240 | 4.00 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 99.7% |
| 2010 | PA | 2230 | 3.60 | Top 10% | South Asian | 98.8% |
| 2010 | PA | 2220 | 3.65 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 98.3% |
| 2010 | PA | 2220 | 3.76 | Top 10% | Hispanic | 100.0% |
| 2010 | PA | 2220 | 4.00 | Salutatorian | Caucasian | 99.8% |
| 2010 | PA | 2220 | 4.00 | Valedictorian | Caucasian | 99.8% |
| 2010 | PA | 2210 | 3.89 | Top 3% | Caucasian | 99.6% |
| 2010 | PA | 2200 | 3.71 | Top 10% | South Asian | 98.9% |
| 2010 | MD | 2200 | 3.90 | Top 10% | Hispanic | 100.0% |
| 2010 | MD | 2200 | 3.90 | Top 10% | South Asian | 99.3% |
| 2010 | PA | 2200 | 4.00 | Top 2% | South Asian | 99.7% |
| 2010 | (Private) | 2180 | 3.60 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 99.9% |
| 2010 | NJ | 2180 | 3.96 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 99.3% |
| 2010 | (Private) | 2170 | 3.75 | Class Not Ranked | South Asian | 98.3% |
| 2010 | VA | 2170 | 4.00 | Top 10% | East Asian | 99.4% |
| 2010 | MA | 2160 | 2.80 | Bottom 50% | East Asian | 24.9% |
| 2010 | PA | 2160 | 3.86 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 99.9% |
| 2010 | PA | 2160 | 3.88 | Top 3% | Caucasian | 100.0% |
| 2010 | VA | 2150 | 3.65 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 98.1% |
| 2010 | NJ | 2150 | 3.90 | Top 4% | Caucasian | 99.5% |
| 2010 | PA | 2150 | 3.83 | Top 3% | Caucasian | 99.4% |
| 2010 | VA | 2150 | 4.00 | Top 1% | Caucasian | 99.7% |
| 2010 | PA | 2150 | 4.00 | Salutatorian | East Asian | 99.7% |
| 2010 | MD | 2150 | 3.90 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 99.1% |
| 2010 | (Private) | 2130 | 3.84 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 99.3% |
| 2010 | NJ | 2130 | 3.80 | Top 15% | Caucasian | 98.2% |
| 2010 | NJ | 2120 | 3.96 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 99.7% |
| 2010 | PA | 2120 | 3.55 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 97.8% |
| 2010 | CA | 2120 | 3.80 | Unknown | East Asian | 98.2% |
| 2010 | PA | 2120 | 3.91 | Top 3% | Caucasian | 99.5% |
| 2010 | MD | 2110 | 3.16 | Bottom 50% | Caucasian | 38.2% |
| 2010 | NH | 2110 | 3.62 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 98.0% |
| 2010 | NJ | 2110 | 3.45 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 93.6% |
| 2010 | NJ | 2100 | 3.40 | Class Not Ranked | None Indicated | 97.5% |
| 2010 | PA | 2100 | 3.26 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 93.2% |
| 2010 | PA | 2100 | 3.00 | Top 15% | South Asian | 88.1% |
| 2010 | NJ | 2100 | 3.95 | Top 3% | East Asian | 99.5% |
| 2010 | MD | 2100 | 3.57 | Top 20% | East Asian | 94.9% |
| 2010 | NJ | 2090 | 3.70 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 99.4% |
| 2010 | PA | 2090 | 3.75 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 98.5% |
| 2010 | PA | 2090 | 3.70 | Class Not Ranked | None Indicated | 99.9% |
| 2010 | MD | 2090 | 4.00 | Top 2% | Caucasian | 99.6% |
| 2010 | NJ | 2090 | 3.35 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 94.2% |
| 2010 | HI | 2090 | 3.69 | Class Not Ranked | East Asian | 97.3% |
| 2010 | NJ | 2080 | 3.76 | Top 10% | East Asian | 98.4% |
| 2010 | CA | 2080 | 3.69 | Top 10% | None Indicated | 98.1% |
| 2010 | (Private) | 2070 | 4.00 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 99.9% |
| 2010 | PA | 2070 | 3.83 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 99.1% |
| 2010 | NJ | 2070 | 3.50 | Class Not Ranked | African-American | 100.0% |
| 2010 | PA | 2070 | 3.85 | Top 2% | Caucasian | 99.3% |
| 2010 | MD | 2060 | 4.00 | Top 1% | Other | 99.5% |
| 2010 | PA | 2060 | 3.95 | Top 1% | Caucasian | 99.5% |
| 2010 | FL | 2060 | 3.35 | Top 2% | Hispanic | 100.0% |
| 2010 | PA | 2060 | 3.83 | Top 10% | East Asian | 98.5% |
| 2010 | MD | 2050 | 3.50 | Top 25% | Caucasian | 92.3% |
| 2010 | XX | 2050 | 3.95 | Class Not Ranked | Other | 98.2% |
| 2010 | NJ | 2040 | 3.37 | Class Not Ranked | South Asian | 95.3% |
| 2010 | NJ | 2040 | 3.95 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 98.2% |
| 2010 | NC | 2040 | 3.64 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 96.3% |
| 2010 | CA | 2030 | 3.86 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 99.0% |
| 2010 | MA | 2030 | 3.65 | Unknown | Caucasian | 96.2% |
| 2010 | MD | 2030 | 4.00 | Top 5% | East Asian | 99.2% |
| 2010 | PA | 2030 | 3.70 | Class Not Ranked | South Asian | 96.6% |
| 2010 | PA | 2030 | 3.80 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 98.2% |
| 2010 | NJ | 2020 | 3.77 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 98.5% |
| 2010 | VA | 2020 | 3.78 | Valedictorian | Caucasian | 100.0% |
| 2010 | MA | 2020 | 3.82 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 98.5% |
| 2010 | PA | 2020 | 3.95 | Top 3% | Caucasian | 99.2% |
| 2010 | MD | 2020 | 3.60 | Top 15% | Hispanic | 100.0% |
| 2010 | VA | 2020 | 3.64 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 99.7% |
| 2010 | NJ | 2010 | 3.48 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 93.9% |
| 2010 | NJ | 2010 | 3.40 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 92.8% |
| 2010 | NY | 2010 | 3.94 | Salutatorian | Caucasian | 99.4% |
| 2010 | PA | 2010 | 3.70 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 97.5% |
| 2010 | NJ | 2000 | 3.37 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 96.3% |
| 2010 | NJ | 2000 | 3.54 | Top 15% | Caucasian | 99.8% |
| 2010 | CA | 2000 | 3.86 | Top 10% | None Indicated | 99.0% |
| 2010 | NY | 2000 | 4.00 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 98.7% |
| 2010 | NJ | 2000 | 3.20 | Bottom 30% | Caucasian | 7.5% |
| 2010 | NY | 2000 | 4.00 | Top 5% | African-American | 100.0% |
| 2010 | FL | 2000 | 3.87 | Unknown | Caucasian | 97.4% |
| 2010 | PA | 1990 | 3.90 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 98.6% |
| 2010 | CT | 1990 | 3.68 | Top 15% | Caucasian | 97.7% |
| 2010 | FL | 1990 | 3.68 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 98.1% |
| 2010 | PA | 1990 | 4.00 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 99.1% |
| 2010 | CA | 1990 | 3.46 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 93.1% |
| 2010 | WV | 1990 | 3.96 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 99.0% |
| 2010 | MD | 1980 | 2.96 | Unknown | Caucasian | 80.1% |
| 2010 | MD | 1980 | 3.50 | Unknown | Caucasian | 93.5% |
| 2010 | NJ | 1980 | 2.98 | Class Not Ranked | Hispanic | 100.0% |
| 2010 | PA | 1980 | 3.75 | Top 15% | Caucasian | 99.8% |
| 2010 | VA | 1980 | 3.31 | Unknown | South Asian | 90.1% |
| 2010 | VA | 1970 | 3.80 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 97.7% |
| 2010 | PA | 1970 | 3.72 | Top 10% | South Asian | 97.2% |
| 2010 | NY | 1970 | 3.64 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 95.0% |
| 2010 | PA | 1960 | 3.76 | Top 15% | Caucasian | 97.5% |
| 2010 | NY | 1960 | 3.86 | Top 15% | Caucasian | 97.4% |
| 2010 | NY | 1960 | 3.86 | Top 15% | Caucasian | 97.4% |
| 2010 | PA | 1960 | 3.89 | Top 15% | Caucasian | 97.0% |
| 2010 | CT | 1950 | 3.60 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 94.1% |
| 2010 | PA | 1950 | 3.60 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 96.0% |
| 2010 | NJ | 1950 | 3.80 | Top 3% | East Asian | 98.6% |
| 2010 | PA | 1940 | 3.40 | Top 25% | Caucasian | 80.6% |
| 2010 | (Private) | 1940 | 3.80 | Top 25% | Caucasian | 91.4% |
| 2010 | PA | 1930 | 3.75 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 97.8% |
| 2010 | PA | 1930 | 3.20 | Top 35% | Caucasian | 51.9% |
| 2010 | NJ | 1930 | 3.50 | Top 25% | Caucasian | 83.3% |
| 2010 | MD | 1930 | 3.60 | Top 15% | Caucasian | 93.5% |
| 2010 | PA | 1920 | 3.94 | Top 3% | Caucasian | 99.0% |
| 2010 | NJ | 1920 | 3.85 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 97.7% |
| 2010 | MD | 1920 | 3.38 | Bottom 50% | Caucasian | 31.3% |
| 2010 | UT | 1920 | 3.86 | Top 3% | Caucasian | 98.6% |
| 2010 | PA | 1920 | 3.70 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 97.6% |
| 2010 | NJ | 1920 | 3.51 | Top 20% | East Asian | 88.1% |
| 2010 | NY | 1920 | 3.60 | Top 20% | Other | 90.2% |
| 2010 | CT | 1910 | 3.25 | Top 25% | Caucasian | 83.7% |
| 2010 | MD | 1910 | 3.28 | Top 15% | Caucasian | 86.3% |
| 2010 | PA | 1910 | 3.81 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 99.8% |
| 2010 | XX | 1910 | 3.70 | Top 20% | South Asian | 91.8% |
| 2010 | FL | 1900 | 3.47 | Top 25% | African-American | 100.0% |
| 2010 | NY | 1900 | 3.50 | Top 20% | Hispanic | 100.0% |
| 2010 | NY | 1890 | 3.84 | Valedictorian | Caucasian | 99.2% |
| 2010 | OH | 1890 | 2.80 | Top 25% | African-American | 100.0% |
| 2010 | VA | 1880 | 3.85 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 96.9% |
| 2010 | FL | 1880 | 3.73 | Top 20% | South Asian | 91.6% |
| 2010 | AZ | 1880 | 3.78 | Top 15% | Native American | 100.0% |
| 2010 | (Private) | 1880 | 3.67 | Top 15% | Caucasian | 93.3% |
| 2010 | MD | 1870 | 3.69 | Top 30% | Caucasian | 79.9% |
| 2010 | MD | 1870 | 3.71 | Top 15% | East Asian | 93.5% |
| 2010 | PA | 1860 | 3.40 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 81.6% |
| 2010 | NJ | 1860 | 3.90 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 97.0% |
| 2010 | VA | 1860 | 3.60 | Unknown | Caucasian | 91.5% |
| 2010 | VA | 1850 | 3.34 | Top 25% | Caucasian | 71.0% |
| 2010 | NJ | 1840 | 3.50 | Top 15% | Caucasian | 88.6% |
| 2010 | CA | 1840 | 3.26 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 98.6% |
| 2010 | CT | 1830 | 3.30 | Top 25% | Caucasian | 67.0% |
| 2010 | NY | 1830 | 3.00 | Top 40% | Caucasian | 22.5% |
| 2010 | NY | 1820 | 3.60 | Top 15% | Caucasian | 95.4% |
| 2010 | NJ | 1820 | 3.40 | Class Not Ranked | East Asian | 88.4% |
| 2010 | NJ | 1820 | 3.75 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 92.8% |
| 2010 | AZ | 1820 | 3.82 | Top 15% | Hispanic | 100.0% |
| 2010 | NJ | 1820 | 3.36 | Class Not Ranked | East Asian | 83.7% |
| 2010 | IL | 1810 | 3.39 | Unknown | Other | 85.2% |
| 2010 | NJ | 1810 | 3.50 | Top 25% | Caucasian | 74.8% |
| 2010 | VA | 1810 | 3.60 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 89.6% |
| 2010 | NY | 1810 | 3.56 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 83.8% |
| 2010 | GA | 1800 | 3.78 | Top 10% | African-American | 100.0% |
| 2010 | MD | 1800 | 3.64 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 93.2% |
| 2010 | PA | 1800 | 3.52 | Top 15% | East Asian | 87.3% |
| 2010 | MD | 1800 | 3.80 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 89.7% |
| 2010 | MD | 1790 | 3.43 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 84.2% |
| 2010 | NJ | 1790 | 3.52 | Class Not Ranked | South Asian | 86.8% |
| 2010 | PA | 1790 | 3.75 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 94.5% |
| 2010 | NJ | 1790 | 3.70 | Top 4% | Hispanic | 100.0% |
| 2010 | (Private) | 1790 | 3.75 | Top 10% | East Asian | 94.5% |
| 2010 | NJ | 1780 | 3.63 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 84.2% |
| 2010 | VA | 1770 | 3.49 | Top 30% | Caucasian | 67.7% |
| 2010 | NY | 1770 | 3.40 | Class Not Ranked | Hispanic | 100.0% |
| 2010 | XX | 1770 | 3.81 | Unknown | East Asian | 92.2% |
| 2010 | MD | 1760 | 3.46 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 83.4% |
| 2010 | PA | 1750 | 3.70 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 93.7% |
| 2010 | XX | 1750 | 3.63 | Class Not Ranked | East Asian | 87.7% |
| 2010 | CT | 1740 | 3.60 | Top 20% | East Asian | 91.3% |
| 2010 | NJ | 1730 | 3.70 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 83.6% |
| 2010 | NJ | 1730 | 3.40 | Top 30% | Caucasian | 52.5% |
| 2010 | NJ | 1730 | 3.50 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 76.2% |
| 2010 | CA | 1720 | 3.50 | Unknown | East Asian | 90.6% |
| 2010 | CT | 1720 | 3.77 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 92.3% |
| 2010 | SC | 1720 | 3.39 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 70.1% |
| 2010 | PA | 1710 | 3.46 | Class Not Ranked | Hispanic | 100.0% |
| 2010 | NJ | 1710 | 3.25 | Top 40% | Caucasian | 23.6% |
| 2010 | XX | 1690 | 3.00 | Class Not Ranked | South Asian | 55.5% |
| 2010 | CT | 1680 | 3.58 | Top 25% | Hispanic | 100.0% |
| 2010 | PA | 1660 | 3.60 | Top 30% | Caucasian | 56.3% |
| 2010 | MD | 1660 | 2.70 | Class Not Ranked | African-American | 100.0% |
| 2010 | FL | 1640 | 3.20 | Top 30% | Caucasian | 46.6% |
| 2010 | MD | 1640 | 3.18 | Class Not Ranked | African-American | 100.0% |
| 2010 | NY | 1620 | 3.50 | Top 25% | African-American | 100.0% |
| 2010 | MD | 1620 | 3.30 | Bottom 50% | East Asian | 9.3% |
| 2010 | PA | 1610 | 3.79 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 98.4% |
| 2010 | NJ | 1600 | 3.40 | Top 10% | Hispanic | 100.0% |
| 2010 | IL | 1560 | 3.75 | Top 15% | Caucasian | 94.6% |
| 2010 | NY | 1520 | 3.67 | Top 10% | Hispanic | 100.0% |
| 2010 | CA | 1510 | 3.77 | Top 15% | Caucasian | 89.9% |
| 2010 | PA | 1450 | 4.00 | Top 1% | Caucasian | 99.7% |
| 2010 | PA | 1340 | 3.30 | Top 20% | Hispanic | 100.0% |
| 2010 | (Private) | 34 | 3.77 | Top 4% | South Asian | 99.6% |
| 2010 | (Private) | 34 | 3.72 | Top 15% | South Asian | 98.8% |
| 2010 | MD | 31 | 3.47 | Top 10% | South Asian | 96.7% |
| 2010 | MI | 31 | 4.00 | Top 2% | Caucasian | 99.5% |
| 2010 | NY | 31 | 3.94 | Class Not Ranked | East Asian | 98.3% |
| 2010 | PA | 31 | 3.40 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 99.6% |
| 2010 | PA | 31 | 4.00 | Top 2% | Caucasian | 100.0% |
| 2010 | FL | 28 | 3.60 | Top 10% | Hispanic | 100.0% |
| 2010 | CA | 27 | 3.60 | Unknown | None Indicated | 90.4% |
| 2010 | FL | 26 | 3.47 | Bottom 50% | Hispanic | 99.9% |
| 2010 | OK | 24 | 3.94 | Top 5% | East Asian | 95.9% |
| 2010 | NY | 21 | 3.20 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 45.2% |
| 2009 | PA | 2360 | 3.35 | Unknown | Caucasian | 98.1% |
| 2009 | (Private) | 2350 | 3.80 | Class Not Ranked | East Asian | 99.3% |
| 2009 | PA | 2350 | 3.80 | Top 10% | Other | 99.5% |
| 2009 | MD | 2330 | 4.00 | Top 5% | South Asian | 99.8% |
| 2009 | PA | 2330 | 4.00 | Valedictorian | South Asian | 99.9% |
| 2009 | PA | 2300 | 4.00 | Top 1% | Caucasian | 99.8% |
| 2009 | MI | 2290 | 3.97 | Top 10% | South Asian | 99.6% |
| 2009 | WA | 2270 | 3.89 | Top 10% | East Asian | 99.5% |
| 2009 | NY | 2250 | 3.95 | Top 5% | African-American | 100.0% |
| 2009 | PA | 2240 | 3.89 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 100.0% |
| 2009 | MA | 2240 | 3.20 | Class Not Ranked | East Asian | 95.6% |
| 2009 | NJ | 2230 | 3.67 | Top 10% | South Asian | 99.1% |
| 2009 | PA | 2230 | 3.75 | Top 10% | South Asian | 99.1% |
| 2009 | NJ | 2230 | 3.77 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 99.5% |
| 2009 | PA | 2230 | 3.45 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 96.1% |
| 2009 | PA | 2230 | 4.00 | Valedictorian | Caucasian | 100.0% |
| 2009 | NJ | 2220 | 3.84 | Class Not Ranked | South Asian | 98.9% |
| 2009 | PA | 2220 | 3.72 | Top 10% | South Asian | 99.0% |
| 2009 | PA | 2220 | 4.00 | Top 1% | Caucasian | 99.8% |
| 2009 | MD | 2200 | 3.57 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 99.9% |
| 2009 | PA | 2200 | 3.85 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 99.5% |
| 2009 | PA | 2190 | 3.80 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 99.4% |
| 2009 | MD | 2170 | 4.00 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 99.6% |
| 2009 | TX | 2170 | 3.78 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 99.0% |
| 2009 | PA | 2170 | 3.80 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 99.0% |
| 2009 | PA | 2160 | 3.80 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 99.9% |
| 2009 | NY | 2150 | 3.48 | Class Not Ranked | Middle-Eastern | 96.6% |
| 2009 | PA | 2150 | 3.88 | Top 1% | South Asian | 99.6% |
| 2009 | FL | 2140 | 3.68 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 98.5% |
| 2009 | PA | 2140 | 3.90 | Salutatorian | Caucasian | 99.6% |
| 2009 | NJ | 2130 | 3.46 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 96.1% |
| 2009 | PA | 2130 | 3.40 | Top 20% | African-American | 100.0% |
| 2009 | (Private) | 2100 | 4.00 | Top 1% | Caucasian | 100.0% |
| 2009 | PA | 2100 | 3.40 | Top 30% | African-American | 100.0% |
| 2009 | NJ | 2100 | 3.70 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 96.2% |
| 2009 | NJ | 2100 | 3.61 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 95.4% |
| 2009 | PA | 2080 | 3.67 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 99.8% |
| 2009 | PA | 2080 | 3.85 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 99.1% |
| 2009 | PA | 2080 | 3.93 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 99.3% |
| 2009 | NJ | 2080 | 3.37 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 91.4% |
| 2009 | PA | 2070 | 3.85 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 98.9% |
| 2009 | (Private) | 2070 | 4.00 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 99.4% |
| 2009 | PA | 2070 | 3.95 | Top 1% | Caucasian | 100.0% |
| 2009 | CA | 2070 | 3.35 | Top 10% | East Asian | 95.7% |
| 2009 | FL | 2070 | 3.86 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 98.7% |
| 2009 | PA | 2070 | 3.36 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 90.9% |
| 2009 | PA | 2070 | 4.00 | Valedictorian | Caucasian | 99.6% |
| 2009 | PA | 2070 | 3.79 | Top 5% | East Asian | 99.0% |
| 2009 | PA | 2070 | 2.98 | Unknown | None Indicated | 86.2% |
| 2009 | PA | 2060 | 3.74 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 97.3% |
| 2009 | MA | 2060 | 3.40 | Top 20% | East Asian | 91.4% |
| 2009 | PA | 2050 | 4.00 | Salutatorian | Other | 99.8% |
| 2009 | NJ | 2050 | 3.93 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 99.2% |
| 2009 | CT | 2050 | 3.90 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 98.7% |
| 2009 | PA | 2050 | 3.20 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 93.5% |
| 2009 | PA | 2050 | 3.95 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 99.2% |
| 2009 | NJ | 2050 | 3.60 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 96.1% |
| 2009 | NJ | 2050 | 3.08 | Class Not Ranked | African-American | 100.0% |
| 2009 | PA | 2040 | 3.60 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 94.6% |
| 2009 | (Private) | 2040 | 3.72 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 97.9% |
| 2009 | NJ | 2040 | 3.93 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 99.1% |
| 2009 | PA | 2040 | 4.00 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 99.3% |
| 2009 | PA | 2040 | 3.68 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 97.7% |
| 2009 | TX | 2030 | 3.50 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 92.2% |
| 2009 | CT | 2030 | 3.80 | Top 20% | None Indicated | 96.0% |
| 2009 | CA | 2020 | 3.38 | Unknown | East Asian | 92.7% |
| 2009 | NJ | 2020 | 3.62 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 95.7% |
| 2009 | NY | 2020 | 3.00 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 84.0% |
| 2009 | PA | 2010 | 4.00 | Top 1% | South Asian | 99.4% |
| 2009 | XX | 2000 | 4.00 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 99.1% |
| 2009 | VA | 2000 | 3.00 | Unknown | East Asian | 82.9% |
| 2009 | NJ | 2000 | 3.49 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 91.0% |
| 2009 | (Private) | 1980 | 3.50 | Top 40% | Caucasian | 96.7% |
| 2009 | NJ | 1980 | 4.00 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 99.1% |
| 2009 | VA | 1980 | 3.84 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 98.0% |
| 2009 | XX | 1980 | 3.80 | Top 10% | South Asian | 97.8% |
| 2009 | PA | 1980 | 3.65 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 99.7% |
| 2009 | XX | 1970 | 3.60 | Top 1% | East Asian | 98.2% |
| 2009 | MD | 1960 | 3.55 | Class Not Ranked | East Asian | 93.6% |
| 2009 | OH | 1950 | 3.20 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 89.9% |
| 2009 | NJ | 1950 | 3.84 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 97.7% |
| 2009 | NJ | 1940 | 3.40 | Unknown | Caucasian | 90.8% |
| 2009 | NY | 1940 | 3.50 | Top 40% | Caucasian | 60.2% |
| 2009 | NJ | 1940 | 3.39 | Unknown | Other | 90.3% |
| 2009 | NY | 1930 | 3.90 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 97.8% |
| 2009 | NY | 1930 | 3.40 | Top 30% | East Asian | 72.3% |
| 2009 | NJ | 1930 | 3.68 | Class Not Ranked | South Asian | 94.6% |
| 2009 | MD | 1930 | 3.50 | Top 25% | Caucasian | 83.3% |
| 2009 | (Private) | 1920 | 3.39 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 86.5% |
| 2009 | FL | 1920 | 3.48 | Top 20% | Hispanic | 100.0% |
| 2009 | NJ | 1920 | 3.60 | Class Not Ranked | Other | 93.3% |
| 2009 | FL | 1920 | 3.10 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 98.6% |
| 2009 | PA | 1910 | 3.70 | Top 10% | Hispanic | 100.0% |
| 2009 | WA | 1910 | 3.48 | Top 30% | East Asian | 74.4% |
| 2009 | PA | 1910 | 3.80 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 98.0% |
| 2009 | PA | 1910 | 3.64 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 90.7% |
| 2009 | FL | 1890 | 3.51 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 95.8% |
| 2009 | CT | 1880 | 2.50 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 93.6% |
| 2009 | NJ | 1870 | 3.30 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 78.5% |
| 2009 | PA | 1870 | 3.60 | Top 5% | South Asian | 96.2% |
| 2009 | OH | 1860 | 2.80 | Class Not Ranked | African-American | 100.0% |
| 2009 | XX | 1860 | 3.44 | Unknown | South Asian | 88.0% |
| 2009 | PA | 1850 | 3.80 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 97.4% |
| 2009 | NJ | 1850 | 3.85 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 92.4% |
| 2009 | PA | 1850 | 3.90 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 97.9% |
| 2009 | PA | 1850 | 3.85 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 97.7% |
| 2009 | PA | 1840 | 3.75 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 98.5% |
| 2009 | NY | 1840 | 3.66 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 91.8% |
| 2009 | FL | 1840 | 3.00 | Top 40% | Caucasian | 83.2% |
| 2009 | PA | 1830 | 4.00 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 94.1% |
| 2009 | DE | 1830 | 4.00 | Top 1% | Caucasian | 98.7% |
| 2009 | CT | 1830 | 3.68 | Top 5% | South Asian | 96.3% |
| 2009 | PA | 1830 | 3.84 | Top 5% | Hispanic | 100.0% |
| 2009 | MD | 1820 | 3.20 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 78.6% |
| 2009 | NY | 1820 | 3.50 | Top 20% | South Asian | 83.1% |
| 2009 | PA | 1820 | 3.75 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 99.7% |
| 2009 | NY | 1820 | 3.55 | Top 10% | East Asian | 92.4% |
| 2009 | DE | 1820 | 3.97 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 98.0% |
| 2009 | (Private) | 1810 | 3.75 | Top 20% | South Asian | 89.0% |
| 2009 | FL | 1800 | 3.00 | Top 10% | Hispanic | 100.0% |
| 2009 | PA | 1800 | 4.00 | Top 1% | Caucasian | 98.5% |
| 2009 | NJ | 1790 | 2.80 | Unknown | South Asian | 59.0% |
| 2009 | NY | 1790 | 4.00 | Top 1% | East Asian | 98.5% |
| 2009 | MA | 1780 | 3.05 | Class Not Ranked | African-American | 100.0% |
| 2009 | NJ | 1780 | 3.43 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 83.5% |
| 2009 | CT | 1770 | 3.50 | Top 30% | Caucasian | 62.3% |
| 2009 | NJ | 1750 | 3.90 | Top 5% | Hispanic | 100.0% |
| 2009 | PA | 1750 | 3.70 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 92.7% |
| 2009 | XX | 1740 | 3.41 | Class Not Ranked | Middle-Eastern | 80.3% |
| 2009 | PA | 1730 | 3.50 | Top 30% | Caucasian | 95.8% |
| 2009 | NY | 1720 | 3.00 | Class Not Ranked | Hispanic | 100.0% |
| 2009 | NJ | 1720 | 3.94 | Top 20% | Other | 89.7% |
| 2009 | NY | 1710 | 3.50 | Class Not Ranked | African-American | 100.0% |
| 2009 | NY | 1700 | 3.85 | Class Not Ranked | Hispanic | 100.0% |
| 2009 | NY | 1700 | 3.64 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 93.1% |
| 2009 | NJ | 1670 | 3.20 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 55.0% |
| 2009 | MD | 1610 | 3.20 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 48.5% |
| 2009 | VA | 1590 | 3.26 | Class Not Ranked | Hispanic | 100.0% |
| 2009 | NJ | 1580 | 2.50 | Unknown | South Asian | 19.5% |
| 2009 | VA | 1580 | 3.80 | Class Not Ranked | African-American | 100.0% |
| 2009 | MD | 1560 | 3.86 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 99.6% |
| 2009 | NY | 1450 | 3.63 | Top 20% | Hispanic | 100.0% |
| 2009 | PA | 1400 | 3.70 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 73.7% |
| 2009 | VA | 1330 | 3.00 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 81.2% |
| 2009 | PA | 31 | 4.00 | Salutatorian | Caucasian | 100.0% |
| 2009 | PA | 34 | 3.90 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 99.5% |
| 2009 | PA | 33 | 3.96 | Class Not Ranked | None Indicated | 99.1% |
| 2009 | CT | 32 | 3.72 | Top 10% | East Asian | 98.6% |
| 2009 | (Private) | 32 | 3.57 | Class Not Ranked | East Asian | 97.0% |
| 2009 | OH | 31 | 4.00 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 97.8% |
| 2009 | NE | 31 | 3.84 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 96.9% |
| 2009 | TX | 30 | 3.40 | Top 30% | African-American | 100.0% |
| 2009 | NJ | 30 | 3.70 | Top 30% | Caucasian | 88.2% |
| 2009 | DC | 29 | 3.70 | Top 10% | None Indicated | 96.8% |
| 2009 | DC | 29 | 3.80 | Top 10% | Hispanic | 100.0% |
| 2009 | XX | 28 | 4.00 | Salutatorian | East Asian | 99.1% |
| 2009 | (Private) | 28 | 3.90 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 98.3% |
| 2009 | FL | 28 | 3.50 | Top 30% | Caucasian | 73.6% |
| 2009 | PA | 25 | 3.80 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 95.6% |
| 2008 | PA | 2340 | 3.70 | Top 10% | East Asian | 99.4% |
| 2008 | PA | 2340 | 4.00 | Valedictorian | East Asian | 99.9% |
| 2008 | PA | 2330 | 4.00 | Valedictorian | Caucasian | 99.9% |
| 2008 | PA | 2300 | 4.00 | Salutatorian | East Asian | 99.8% |
| 2008 | NY | 2290 | 4.00 | Valedictorian | None Indicated | 99.8% |
| 2008 | PA | 2250 | 3.85 | Top 10% | South Asian | 99.4% |
| 2008 | PA | 2220 | 3.25 | Bottom 50% | East Asian | 55.2% |
| 2008 | PA | 2220 | 4.00 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 99.2% |
| 2008 | VA | 2220 | 3.89 | Top 10% | None Indicated | 99.3% |
| 2008 | PA | 2220 | 3.94 | Top 1% | East Asian | 99.7% |
| 2008 | MA | 2210 | 3.56 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 98.5% |
| 2008 | NJ | 2210 | 3.80 | Top 5% | None Indicated | 99.4% |
| 2008 | FL | 2200 | 3.95 | Salutatorian | Caucasian | 99.7% |
| 2008 | PA | 2190 | 3.70 | Top 5% | South Asian | 99.2% |
| 2008 | (Private) | 2190 | 3.52 | Top 20% | East Asian | 96.1% |
| 2008 | VA | 2160 | 4.00 | Valedictorian | Caucasian | 99.7% |
| 2008 | PA | 2150 | 4.00 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 99.6% |
| 2008 | PA | 2150 | 3.98 | Valedictorian | Caucasian | 99.7% |
| 2008 | NY | 2130 | 3.85 | Unknown | East Asian | 98.8% |
| 2008 | PA | 2130 | 4.00 | Valedictorian | Caucasian | 99.7% |
| 2008 | NJ | 2120 | 3.96 | Salutatorian | None Indicated | 99.6% |
| 2008 | PA | 2110 | 3.98 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 99.1% |
| 2008 | NY | 2090 | 4.00 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 99.3% |
| 2008 | TX | 2090 | 3.55 | Top 40% | Caucasian | 76.6% |
| 2008 | PA | 2090 | 3.60 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 97.8% |
| 2008 | PA | 2090 | 3.70 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 98.2% |
| 2008 | PA | 2070 | 3.25 | Top 20% | South Asian | 91.0% |
| 2008 | PA | 2060 | 3.50 | Top 10% | African-American | 100.0% |
| 2008 | PA | 2060 | 3.90 | Top 10% | Other | 98.7% |
| 2008 | PA | 2060 | 3.70 | Top 10% | Hispanic | 100.0% |
| 2008 | MA | 2050 | 3.30 | Unknown | Hispanic | 100.0% |
| 2008 | PA | 2020 | 3.70 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 97.4% |
| 2008 | PA | 2020 | 3.40 | Unknown | None Indicated | 94.3% |
| 2008 | NJ | 2020 | 3.80 | Top 10% | South Asian | 98.1% |
| 2008 | NY | 2020 | 3.70 | Top 10% | Hispanic | 100.0% |
| 2008 | NJ | 2020 | 4.00 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 98.8% |
| 2008 | PA | 2010 | 3.94 | Salutatorian | African-American | 100.0% |
| 2008 | PA | 2010 | 4.00 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 98.8% |
| 2008 | PA | 2010 | 4.00 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 98.8% |
| 2008 | CA | 1980 | 3.67 | Valedictorian | Caucasian | 98.7% |
| 2008 | CT | 1980 | 3.55 | Unknown | Caucasian | 94.1% |
| 2008 | PA | 1980 | 4.00 | Salutatorian | Caucasian | 99.4% |
| 2008 | PA | 1980 | 3.90 | Top 5% | Hispanic | 100.0% |
| 2008 | NJ | 1950 | 3.60 | Top 30% | Caucasian | 88.5% |
| 2008 | VA | 1950 | 3.63 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 97.5% |
| 2008 | NY | 1950 | 3.58 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 90.9% |
| 2008 | MA | 1930 | 3.03 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 71.5% |
| 2008 | OH | 1920 | 3.53 | Unknown | Caucasian | 92.2% |
| 2008 | MD | 1910 | 3.50 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 87.5% |
| 2008 | CA | 1910 | 3.40 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 84.7% |
| 2008 | MD | 1900 | 3.10 | Unknown | Caucasian | 79.7% |
| 2008 | NJ | 1880 | 3.75 | Unknown | Other | 94.3% |
| 2008 | OH | 1860 | 3.39 | Top 30% | Caucasian | 65.4% |
| 2008 | NY | 1860 | 3.50 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 84.8% |
| 2008 | MA | 1860 | 3.99 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 97.6% |
| 2008 | NJ | 1840 | 3.80 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 91.2% |
| 2008 | MD | 1830 | 3.74 | Class Not Ranked | South Asian | 92.9% |
| 2008 | NJ | 1820 | 3.70 | Unknown | Caucasian | 92.0% |
| 2008 | (Private) | 1810 | 3.72 | Top 20% | East Asian | 88.3% |
| 2008 | MD | 1810 | 3.65 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 86.4% |
| 2008 | MD | 1780 | 3.50 | Top 20% | African-American | 100.0% |
| 2008 | SC | 1750 | 3.90 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 96.8% |
| 2008 | FL | 1740 | 3.65 | Unknown | Other | 87.7% |
| 2008 | NJ | 1730 | 3.54 | Unknown | Hispanic | 100.0% |
| 2008 | NJ | 1700 | 2.90 | Unknown | South Asian | 51.0% |
| 2008 | NJ | 1580 | 2.56 | Unknown | None Indicated | 21.8% |
| 2008 | PA | 1510 | 3.70 | Bottom 50% | Other | 13.9% |
| 2008 | OH | 1250 | 4.00 | Valedictorian | Caucasian | 99.6% |
| 2008 | (Private) | 33 | 3.94 | Top 5% | None Indicated | 99.6% |
| 2008 | MI | 32 | 3.60 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 98.1% |
| 2008 | FL | 28 | 3.70 | Top 5% | None Indicated | 97.3% |
| 2008 | PA | 28 | 3.50 | Unknown | Caucasian | 90.6% |
| 2007 | PA | 2220 | 4.00 | Top 1% | East Asian | 99.8% |
| 2007 | NJ | 2140 | 3.55 | Unknown | South Asian | 97.0% |
| 2007 | PA | 2120 | 3.89 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 99.3% |
| 2007 | NJ | 2100 | 3.68 | Class Not Ranked | East Asian | 97.3% |
| 2007 | NY | 2000 | 3.80 | Top 20% | Hispanic | 100.0% |
| 2007 | PA | 2000 | 3.50 | Unknown | East Asian | 94.0% |
| 2007 | NJ | 1890 | 3.60 | Unknown | Middle-Eastern | 92.4% |
| 2007 | XX | 1850 | 3.80 | Unknown | East Asian | 94.3% |
| 2007 | PA | 1820 | 3.70 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 96.3% |
| 2007 | GA | 1810 | 3.60 | Unknown | Caucasian | 89.6% |
| 2007 | FL | 1700 | 2.60 | Unknown | Caucasian | 34.0% |
| 2007 | NY | 1670 | 3.97 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 96.3% |
| 2007 | FL | 31 | 3.53 | Unknown | East Asian | 95.8% |
| 2006 | NY | 2180 | 3.87 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 99.2% |
| 2006 | VA | 2020 | 3.90 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 99.0% |
| 2005 | VA | 1790 | 3.40 | Class Not Ranked | Hispanic | 100.0% |
| 2005 | CT | 1310 | 3.50 | Unknown | None Indicated | 93.0% |
| 2005 | NJ | 1250 | 3.70 | Top 30% | None Indicated | 80.6% |
|
| 2010 | NY | 2080 | 3.68 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 98.1% |
| 2010 | NY | 1860 | 3.90 | Top 20% | East Asian | 93.5% |
| 2010 | OH | 1800 | 3.60 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 84.5% |
|
|
| 2010 | MD | 2370 | 2.88 | Top 4% | Caucasian | 97.8% |
| 2010 | PA | 2090 | 3.40 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 95.6% |
| 2010 | PA | 2070 | 2.52 | Bottom 40% | Caucasian | 10.6% |
| 2010 | CT | 2040 | 3.20 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 90.2% |
| 2010 | NJ | 1910 | 3.25 | Top 40% | None Indicated | 92.4% |
| 2010 | NY | 1890 | 3.60 | Unknown | Caucasian | 92.4% |
| 2010 | ME | 1880 | 3.70 | Top 15% | Caucasian | 93.7% |
| 2010 | PA | 1860 | 3.30 | Bottom 50% | East Asian | 22.5% |
| 2010 | NY | 1840 | 3.20 | Class Not Ranked | Hispanic | 100.0% |
| 2010 | PA | 1830 | 3.36 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 84.3% |
| 2010 | VA | 1820 | 3.10 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 73.7% |
| 2010 | NJ | 1810 | 2.80 | Class Not Ranked | East Asian | 56.8% |
| 2010 | PA | 1790 | 3.29 | Top 30% | Caucasian | 52.5% |
| 2010 | NJ | 1780 | 3.50 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 85.6% |
| 2010 | CA | 1760 | 2.95 | Unknown | Caucasian | 60.3% |
| 2010 | NJ | 1740 | 3.55 | Top 35% | Caucasian | 51.9% |
| 2010 | PA | 1730 | 2.81 | Bottom 50% | Caucasian | 6.2% |
| 2010 | PA | 1730 | 3.26 | Bottom 50% | Caucasian | 13.1% |
| 2010 | (Private) | 1720 | 3.50 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 88.2% |
| 2010 | NJ | 1710 | 3.40 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 77.8% |
| 2010 | PA | 1700 | 4.00 | Top 1% | South Asian | 97.8% |
| 2010 | NY | 1690 | 3.40 | Unknown | Caucasian | 76.1% |
| 2010 | NY | 1680 | 3.28 | Bottom 50% | Caucasian | 11.3% |
| 2010 | PA | 1670 | 3.77 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 93.1% |
| 2010 | NJ | 1670 | 3.22 | Top 30% | Caucasian | 35.8% |
| 2010 | NJ | 1670 | 3.08 | Class Not Ranked | South Asian | 58.2% |
| 2010 | NY | 1660 | 3.40 | Top 30% | Caucasian | 44.7% |
| 2010 | VA | 1620 | 3.40 | Top 35% | African-American | 99.9% |
| 2010 | NJ | 1620 | 3.30 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 96.9% |
| 2010 | NY | 1600 | 3.59 | Top 30% | Caucasian | 49.9% |
| 2010 | CA | 1520 | 3.32 | Top 25% | Caucasian | 38.2% |
| 2010 | NY | 1360 | 3.05 | Bottom 50% | Caucasian | 1.8% |
| 2010 | PA | 28 | 3.50 | Top 40% | Caucasian | 54.8% |
| 2009 | PA | 2060 | 2.70 | Bottom 40% | Caucasian | 55.0% |
| 2009 | CA | 2040 | 2.50 | Class Not Ranked | South Asian | 66.9% |
| 2009 | NJ | 1930 | 3.10 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 81.7% |
| 2009 | PA | 1880 | 3.70 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 90.7% |
| 2009 | NY | 1850 | 3.64 | Top 30% | South Asian | 76.5% |
| 2009 | PA | 1850 | 2.90 | Unknown | South Asian | 66.6% |
| 2009 | NJ | 1810 | 3.40 | Top 30% | Caucasian | 60.8% |
| 2009 | NY | 1800 | 3.10 | Top 30% | Caucasian | 42.4% |
| 2009 | NJ | 1800 | 3.40 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 83.8% |
| 2009 | PA | 1770 | 3.78 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 94.4% |
| 2009 | CT | 1710 | 3.25 | Top 40% | Caucasian | 23.6% |
| 2009 | SC | 1700 | 3.12 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 63.6% |
| 2009 | MD | 1700 | 3.43 | Top 30% | East Asian | 51.0% |
| 2009 | NY | 1670 | 3.10 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 59.4% |
| 2009 | PA | 1660 | 3.80 | Top 40% | Caucasian | 47.4% |
| 2009 | MA | 1610 | 3.60 | Top 30% | Caucasian | 51.2% |
| 2009 | PA | 1560 | 3.30 | Top 40% | Caucasian | 15.4% |
| 2009 | PA | 1520 | 3.54 | Top 40% | Caucasian | 21.2% |
| 2009 | NJ | 1490 | 3.23 | Class Not Ranked | South Asian | 47.6% |
| 2009 | NJ | 28 | 3.00 | Top 40% | Caucasian | 27.3% |
| 2008 | NJ | 2070 | 3.50 | Unknown | None Indicated | 95.5% |
| 2008 | NJ | 1980 | 3.15 | Top 30% | Caucasian | 64.4% |
| 2008 | NJ | 1980 | 3.00 | Unknown | Caucasian | 81.5% |
| 2008 | PA | 1950 | 3.30 | Top 30% | African-American | 100.0% |
| 2008 | NJ | 1860 | 3.19 | Unknown | South Asian | 82.4% |
| 2008 | (Private) | 1850 | 3.65 | Top 30% | Caucasian | 77.0% |
| 2008 | NJ | 1730 | 3.76 | Top 30% | Other | 72.0% |
| 2008 | PA | 1720 | 3.40 | Top 30% | Caucasian | 58.3% |
| 2008 | NJ | 1710 | 3.40 | Top 20% | South Asian | 69.8% |
| 2008 | NY | 1710 | 3.08 | Bottom 50% | East Asian | 8.3% |
| 2007 | CA | 1720 | 3.70 | Top 10% | None Indicated | 91.8% |
|
| 2012 | IL | 2100 | 3.70 | Top 15% | Hispanic | 100.0% |
| 2011 | IL | 2230 | 3.50 | Top 25% | Caucasian | 94.8% |
| 2011 | NJ | 2010 | 3.75 | Top 15% | Caucasian | 96.7% |
| 2011 | PA | 1940 | 2.67 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 75.1% |
| 2011 | NY | 1910 | 3.00 | Class Not Ranked | African-American | 100.0% |
| 2011 | MI | 29 | 3.61 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 91.5% |
| 2010 | NY | 2400 | 3.80 | Top 10% | South Asian | 99.6% |
| 2010 | PA | 2350 | 3.95 | Top 1% | East Asian | 99.8% |
| 2010 | CA | 2330 | 4.00 | Top 2% | South Asian | 99.8% |
| 2010 | FL | 2300 | 3.70 | Top 5% | Hispanic | 100.0% |
| 2010 | WA | 2280 | 3.91 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 100.0% |
| 2010 | NJ | 2220 | 3.90 | Class Not Ranked | East Asian | 99.0% |
| 2010 | MD | 2220 | 3.02 | Bottom 50% | Caucasian | 41.8% |
| 2010 | PA | 2210 | 3.62 | Top 5% | East Asian | 99.2% |
| 2010 | PA | 2190 | 3.50 | Top 15% | Caucasian | 97.3% |
| 2010 | NY | 2160 | 3.90 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 99.2% |
| 2010 | VA | 2130 | 3.83 | Top 2% | South Asian | 99.7% |
| 2010 | MD | 2120 | 3.63 | Top 40% | Caucasian | 85.8% |
| 2010 | NJ | 2120 | 3.13 | Unknown | Caucasian | 91.7% |
| 2010 | VA | 2100 | 3.80 | Top 25% | Caucasian | 95.5% |
| 2010 | VA | 2080 | 3.90 | Top 4% | Caucasian | 99.3% |
| 2010 | PA | 2050 | 3.60 | Top 20% | African-American | 100.0% |
| 2010 | XX | 2040 | 3.86 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 98.0% |
| 2010 | CA | 2040 | 3.54 | Unknown | East Asian | 95.3% |
| 2010 | VA | 2040 | 3.50 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 92.4% |
| 2010 | FL | 2030 | 3.90 | Top 2% | Caucasian | 99.3% |
| 2010 | (Private) | 2020 | 3.75 | Top 15% | East Asian | 96.8% |
| 2010 | NJ | 2020 | 3.98 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 98.1% |
| 2010 | TX | 2010 | 3.60 | Top 30% | Caucasian | 85.6% |
| 2010 | NY | 1990 | 3.53 | Unknown | East Asian | 94.1% |
| 2010 | PA | 1980 | 3.70 | Top 25% | None Indicated | 90.9% |
| 2010 | XX | 1970 | 2.80 | Unknown | Middle-Eastern | 72.7% |
| 2010 | XX | 1970 | 4.00 | Class Not Ranked | East Asian | 97.8% |
| 2010 | PA | 1960 | 3.90 | Top 3% | South Asian | 98.9% |
| 2010 | PA | 1940 | 3.97 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 98.9% |
| 2010 | NY | 1940 | 3.68 | Top 15% | Caucasian | 94.8% |
| 2010 | XX | 1940 | 3.60 | Top 10% | East Asian | 95.8% |
| 2010 | PA | 1910 | 3.85 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 98.2% |
| 2010 | XX | 1910 | 3.00 | Top 20% | East Asian | 68.4% |
| 2010 | MD | 1910 | 2.40 | Bottom 40% | Caucasian | 1.9% |
| 2010 | (Private) | 1900 | 3.20 | Top 35% | South Asian | 48.6% |
| 2010 | PA | 1890 | 3.68 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 99.7% |
| 2010 | XX | 1890 | 3.70 | Class Not Ranked | Other | 93.9% |
| 2010 | NY | 1890 | 3.90 | Top 4% | Caucasian | 98.4% |
| 2010 | NJ | 1880 | 3.63 | Top 30% | Caucasian | 83.0% |
| 2010 | CT | 1880 | 3.30 | Unknown | Caucasian | 85.3% |
| 2010 | MA | 1870 | 2.85 | Unknown | Caucasian | 65.7% |
| 2010 | MD | 1860 | 3.76 | Top 20% | South Asian | 91.2% |
| 2010 | CA | 1860 | 3.00 | Top 25% | East Asian | 53.4% |
| 2010 | PA | 1860 | 3.65 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 94.8% |
| 2010 | PA | 1860 | 3.60 | Top 25% | Caucasian | 82.4% |
| 2010 | PA | 1860 | 3.44 | Top 35% | Middle-Eastern | 58.4% |
| 2010 | NJ | 1850 | 3.60 | Top 20% | None Indicated | 87.2% |
| 2010 | XX | 1840 | 4.00 | Top 2% | South Asian | 98.7% |
| 2010 | PA | 1840 | 3.84 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 99.8% |
| 2010 | VA | 1830 | 3.30 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 82.3% |
| 2010 | VA | 1830 | 3.30 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 82.3% |
| 2010 | CT | 1830 | 3.40 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 98.5% |
| 2010 | MD | 1830 | 3.40 | Top 35% | East Asian | 52.8% |
| 2010 | NJ | 1820 | 4.00 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 97.9% |
| 2010 | PA | 1820 | 3.80 | Top 10% | African-American | 100.0% |
| 2010 | MD | 1820 | 3.80 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 90.5% |
| 2010 | CA | 1820 | 3.83 | Top 3% | Hispanic | 100.0% |
| 2010 | PA | 1820 | 3.70 | Top 15% | Caucasian | 99.5% |
| 2010 | NJ | 1820 | 3.50 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 87.7% |
| 2010 | NY | 1820 | 3.50 | Top 25% | Caucasian | 75.7% |
| 2010 | NJ | 1810 | 4.00 | Top 3% | Caucasian | 98.3% |
| 2010 | CT | 1810 | 4.00 | Top 3% | Caucasian | 99.9% |
| 2010 | PA | 1810 | 3.47 | Top 25% | Caucasian | 73.4% |
| 2010 | PA | 1810 | 3.50 | Class Not Ranked | Hispanic | 100.0% |
| 2010 | PA | 1810 | 3.68 | Top 30% | Caucasian | 74.9% |
| 2010 | FL | 1800 | 3.30 | Top 15% | Caucasian | 82.3% |
| 2010 | XX | 1800 | 4.00 | Top 1% | South Asian | 98.5% |
| 2010 | VA | 1800 | 3.76 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 94.8% |
| 2010 | IL | 1790 | 3.70 | Top 10% | Middle-Eastern | 93.8% |
| 2010 | VA | 1790 | 3.22 | Unknown | Middle-Eastern | 76.5% |
| 2010 | XX | 1790 | 3.30 | Unknown | East Asian | 79.7% |
| 2010 | PA | 1780 | 3.80 | Top 15% | Caucasian | 92.5% |
| 2010 | PA | 1780 | 4.00 | Top 1% | Caucasian | 98.4% |
| 2010 | NY | 1780 | 2.90 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 59.4% |
| 2010 | PA | 1780 | 2.99 | Top 35% | Caucasian | 25.6% |
| 2010 | TX | 1770 | 3.88 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 96.5% |
| 2010 | NY | 1770 | 3.20 | Top 15% | Hispanic | 100.0% |
| 2010 | NJ | 1770 | 3.61 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 83.1% |
| 2010 | (Private) | 1760 | 3.62 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 88.0% |
| 2010 | PA | 1760 | 3.60 | Top 15% | Caucasian | 87.5% |
| 2010 | PA | 1750 | 3.84 | Top 1% | Caucasian | 98.9% |
| 2010 | NJ | 1750 | 3.50 | Top 25% | Caucasian | 72.8% |
| 2010 | PA | 1750 | 3.90 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 95.3% |
| 2010 | NJ | 1740 | 3.44 | Bottom 50% | Caucasian | 19.4% |
| 2010 | PA | 1730 | 3.75 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 85.2% |
| 2010 | PA | 1730 | 3.56 | Top 30% | South Asian | 61.6% |
| 2010 | (Private) | 1720 | 3.70 | Top 30% | Caucasian | 67.9% |
| 2010 | NJ | 1720 | 3.60 | Top 30% | Caucasian | 62.6% |
| 2010 | NJ | 1720 | 3.47 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 81.1% |
| 2010 | MD | 1710 | 3.37 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 88.2% |
| 2010 | NY | 1710 | 3.70 | Unknown | Caucasian | 87.6% |
| 2010 | (Private) | 1710 | 3.53 | Top 25% | Caucasian | 67.4% |
| 2010 | VA | 1700 | 2.88 | Unknown | Caucasian | 49.8% |
| 2010 | MD | 1680 | 3.29 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 61.0% |
| 2010 | PA | 1680 | 3.30 | Top 30% | Caucasian | 41.2% |
| 2010 | MD | 1670 | 2.71 | Unknown | African-American | 100.0% |
| 2010 | PA | 1660 | 3.20 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 64.3% |
| 2010 | XX | 1660 | 4.00 | Top 10% | Hispanic | 100.0% |
| 2010 | MD | 1660 | 2.95 | Top 25% | Caucasian | 29.9% |
| 2010 | PA | 1640 | 3.40 | Top 40% | Caucasian | 24.6% |
| 2010 | PA | 1630 | 3.65 | Top 30% | Caucasian | 56.0% |
| 2010 | PA | 1620 | 2.97 | Bottom 50% | Caucasian | 4.5% |
| 2010 | PA | 1610 | 3.70 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 75.2% |
| 2010 | MD | 1610 | 3.57 | Class Not Ranked | East Asian | 77.2% |
| 2010 | GA | 1600 | 3.20 | Bottom 50% | Caucasian | 76.9% |
| 2010 | PA | 1600 | 2.84 | Bottom 50% | East Asian | 3.1% |
| 2010 | PA | 1600 | 3.63 | Top 15% | Caucasian | 78.7% |
| 2010 | (Private) | 1570 | 3.50 | Top 3% | East Asian | 86.6% |
| 2010 | IN | 1560 | 3.75 | Valedictorian | Caucasian | 96.7% |
| 2010 | NJ | 1550 | 3.83 | Top 15% | Caucasian | 82.8% |
| 2010 | PA | 1530 | 3.37 | Top 25% | Caucasian | 39.4% |
| 2010 | DE | 1450 | 3.50 | Top 5% | African-American | 100.0% |
| 2010 | FL | 1400 | 3.50 | Top 35% | Caucasian | 24.1% |
| 2010 | PA | 1320 | 3.85 | Top 5% | East Asian | 80.9% |
| 2010 | NJ | 1280 | 3.00 | Bottom 50% | Caucasian | 16.1% |
| 2010 | PA | 1210 | 2.40 | Bottom 50% | Caucasian | 0.2% |
| 2010 | PA | 33 | 3.50 | Class Not Ranked | South Asian | 97.3% |
| 2010 | VA | 31 | 3.70 | Class Not Ranked | East Asian | 97.1% |
| 2010 | NY | 29 | 3.55 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 93.4% |
| 2010 | PA | 29 | 3.72 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 95.5% |
| 2010 | NY | 28 | 3.50 | Top 25% | South Asian | 80.8% |
| 2010 | NJ | 27 | 3.86 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 97.5% |
| 2010 | CA | 27 | 3.47 | Top 20% | East Asian | 82.1% |
| 2010 | MD | 27 | 3.10 | Top 30% | Caucasian | 45.6% |
| 2010 | PA | 25 | 3.24 | Bottom 50% | Caucasian | 69.8% |
| 2010 | NJ | 24 | 3.18 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 63.2% |
| 2010 | PA | 23 | 3.76 | Top 40% | African-American | 100.0% |
| 2010 | PA | 23 | 3.52 | Bottom 50% | Caucasian | 13.9% |
| 2010 | PA | 20 | 3.51 | Top 40% | African-American | 99.8% |
| 2009 | PA | 2270 | 3.55 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 98.8% |
| 2009 | NJ | 2260 | 3.60 | Class Not Ranked | South Asian | 98.4% |
| 2009 | PA | 2180 | 4.00 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 99.6% |
| 2009 | NJ | 2170 | 3.60 | Unknown | South Asian | 97.6% |
| 2009 | NJ | 2130 | 3.46 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 96.1% |
| 2009 | XX | 2120 | 3.70 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 96.5% |
| 2009 | PA | 2120 | 3.75 | Top 20% | Hispanic | 100.0% |
| 2009 | NJ | 2100 | 3.50 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 96.0% |
| 2009 | VA | 2090 | 3.95 | Top 1% | Caucasian | 99.5% |
| 2009 | PA | 2080 | 3.64 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 96.2% |
| 2009 | VA | 2080 | 3.66 | Unknown | East Asian | 97.0% |
| 2009 | NY | 2070 | 3.19 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 91.1% |
| 2009 | VA | 2060 | 3.90 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 97.2% |
| 2009 | NY | 2050 | 3.35 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 92.7% |
| 2009 | PA | 2050 | 3.20 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 90.5% |
| 2009 | PA | 2040 | 3.20 | Bottom 50% | Other | 33.4% |
| 2009 | XX | 2040 | 3.80 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 98.8% |
| 2009 | NJ | 2040 | 3.65 | Top 40% | Caucasian | 76.8% |
| 2009 | MD | 2020 | 3.72 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 94.9% |
| 2009 | MD | 2020 | 4.00 | Top 1% | Caucasian | 99.4% |
| 2009 | NJ | 2020 | 3.75 | Unknown | Caucasian | 96.8% |
| 2009 | (Private) | 2000 | 3.40 | Bottom 50% | Middle-Eastern | 40.4% |
| 2009 | VA | 1990 | 3.30 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 90.3% |
| 2009 | NY | 1980 | 3.47 | Class Not Ranked | Hispanic | 100.0% |
| 2009 | PA | 1980 | 3.60 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 94.7% |
| 2009 | FL | 1970 | 3.67 | Top 10% | South Asian | 97.3% |
| 2009 | MD | 1970 | 3.30 | Bottom 40% | Caucasian | 17.0% |
| 2009 | XX | 1960 | 4.00 | Top 5% | East Asian | 99.0% |
| 2009 | PA | 1960 | 3.50 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 95.2% |
| 2009 | XX | 1960 | 4.00 | Top 20% | East Asian | 96.5% |
| 2009 | PA | 1960 | 3.26 | Top 30% | Caucasian | 68.1% |
| 2009 | NJ | 1950 | 3.10 | Class Not Ranked | East Asian | 83.1% |
| 2009 | PA | 1940 | 3.89 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 97.9% |
| 2009 | NJ | 1940 | 3.75 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 93.5% |
| 2009 | PA | 1930 | 3.47 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 92.1% |
| 2009 | TX | 1910 | 3.40 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 92.8% |
| 2009 | PA | 1910 | 3.40 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 99.5% |
| 2009 | PA | 1910 | 3.90 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 98.4% |
| 2009 | PA | 1900 | 3.00 | Top 10% | African-American | 100.0% |
| 2009 | PA | 1900 | 3.75 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 95.1% |
| 2009 | PA | 1900 | 3.60 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 89.3% |
| 2009 | DE | 1890 | 3.90 | Top 5% | South Asian | 98.3% |
| 2009 | NJ | 1890 | 3.74 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 96.2% |
| 2009 | MA | 1880 | 3.34 | Top 20% | East Asian | 80.8% |
| 2009 | PA | 1870 | 4.00 | Salutatorian | East Asian | 99.0% |
| 2009 | PA | 1870 | 3.60 | Top 20% | South Asian | 88.0% |
| 2009 | MN | 1860 | 3.70 | Top 10% | East Asian | 95.4% |
| 2009 | PA | 1860 | 3.36 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 90.2% |
| 2009 | PA | 1860 | 3.60 | Top 30% | Caucasian | 98.1% |
| 2009 | PA | 1850 | 3.29 | Top 30% | Caucasian | 58.9% |
| 2009 | NJ | 1850 | 3.81 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 94.4% |
| 2009 | NJ | 1840 | 3.31 | Class Not Ranked | East Asian | 83.2% |
| 2009 | PA | 1840 | 3.50 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 92.1% |
| 2009 | NY | 1840 | 3.65 | Top 20% | East Asian | 87.9% |
| 2009 | VA | 1820 | 3.00 | Top 30% | Caucasian | 39.0% |
| 2009 | PA | 1820 | 3.60 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 85.7% |
| 2009 | NJ | 1800 | 3.50 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 81.2% |
| 2009 | MA | 1790 | 3.60 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 88.8% |
| 2009 | PA | 1790 | 3.55 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 82.4% |
| 2009 | PA | 1780 | 3.60 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 98.8% |
| 2009 | PA | 1770 | 3.00 | Top 30% | Native American | 100.0% |
| 2009 | FL | 1760 | 2.90 | Top 30% | Caucasian | 30.2% |
| 2009 | PA | 1760 | 3.52 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 85.3% |
| 2009 | (Private) | 1750 | 3.80 | Top 20% | African-American | 100.0% |
| 2009 | PA | 1740 | 3.82 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 87.6% |
| 2009 | FL | 1730 | 3.43 | Top 10% | South Asian | 86.2% |
| 2009 | PA | 1720 | 3.00 | Unknown | Caucasian | 58.7% |
| 2009 | PA | 1710 | 3.85 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 93.8% |
| 2009 | NJ | 1700 | 2.86 | Unknown | Other | 48.7% |
| 2009 | PA | 1680 | 3.91 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 95.9% |
| 2009 | PA | 1670 | 3.55 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 73.5% |
| 2009 | MA | 1650 | 3.80 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 82.0% |
| 2009 | PA | 1650 | 3.00 | Bottom 50% | Caucasian | 5.5% |
| 2009 | NY | 1640 | 3.67 | Top 5% | Hispanic | 100.0% |
| 2009 | PA | 1630 | 3.91 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 94.9% |
| 2009 | MA | 1620 | 3.74 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 77.6% |
| 2009 | XX | 1620 | 3.85 | Top 20% | East Asian | 81.8% |
| 2009 | VA | 1600 | 2.50 | Class Not Ranked | Hispanic | 99.9% |
| 2009 | PA | 1550 | 2.50 | Bottom 30% | Caucasian | 0.2% |
| 2009 | MD | 1550 | 3.10 | Bottom 10% | African-American | 86.5% |
| 2009 | PA | 1550 | 3.85 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 76.9% |
| 2009 | PA | 1510 | 3.72 | Top 30% | Caucasian | 47.1% |
| 2009 | PA | 1470 | 2.80 | Bottom 50% | Caucasian | 1.6% |
| 2009 | PA | 1430 | 3.50 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 46.5% |
| 2009 | PA | 1330 | 3.80 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 53.0% |
| 2009 | PA | 1250 | 3.00 | Bottom 50% | Caucasian | 13.3% |
| 2009 | PA | 1070 | 3.70 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 74.7% |
| 2009 | OH | 30 | 3.66 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 97.3% |
| 2009 | OH | 29 | 3.60 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 91.3% |
| 2009 | FL | 28 | 3.98 | Top 1% | Caucasian | 99.0% |
| 2009 | KY | 26 | 3.90 | Top 20% | East Asian | 91.2% |
| 2009 | MS | 24 | 3.40 | Top 20% | African-American | 100.0% |
| 2009 | PA | 24 | 3.76 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 81.5% |
| 2008 | NY | 2370 | 3.93 | Class Not Ranked | East Asian | 99.5% |
| 2008 | XX | 2350 | 3.97 | Valedictorian | South Asian | 99.9% |
| 2008 | MD | 2280 | 4.00 | Valedictorian | South Asian | 99.8% |
| 2008 | NJ | 2240 | 3.43 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 97.4% |
| 2008 | FL | 2220 | 4.00 | Top 5% | Hispanic | 100.0% |
| 2008 | PA | 2180 | 3.40 | Unknown | None Indicated | 96.6% |
| 2008 | NJ | 2140 | 3.80 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 98.9% |
| 2008 | NY | 2090 | 3.83 | Class Not Ranked | East Asian | 98.3% |
| 2008 | PA | 2040 | 3.45 | Unknown | Caucasian | 94.3% |
| 2008 | VA | 2030 | 3.30 | Unknown | Other | 91.8% |
| 2008 | XX | 2020 | 3.70 | Valedictorian | None Indicated | 98.9% |
| 2008 | PA | 2020 | 3.62 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 93.7% |
| 2008 | VA | 2010 | 3.30 | Unknown | Caucasian | 91.0% |
| 2008 | NY | 2010 | 3.75 | Unknown | Caucasian | 96.7% |
| 2008 | PA | 1980 | 3.39 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 91.5% |
| 2008 | NJ | 1980 | 3.28 | Top 30% | Caucasian | 71.1% |
| 2008 | NJ | 1960 | 4.00 | Valedictorian | None Indicated | 99.3% |
| 2008 | PA | 1960 | 3.40 | Top 30% | African-American | 100.0% |
| 2008 | FL | 1950 | 3.30 | Top 10% | Hispanic | 100.0% |
| 2008 | PA | 1950 | 3.85 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 97.7% |
| 2008 | VA | 1940 | 3.30 | Unknown | Other | 88.3% |
| 2008 | PA | 1930 | 3.80 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 93.9% |
| 2008 | CA | 1930 | 3.60 | Unknown | Hispanic | 100.0% |
| 2008 | VA | 1920 | 3.30 | Top 30% | Caucasian | 66.5% |
| 2008 | PA | 1920 | 3.80 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 98.1% |
| 2008 | NY | 1910 | 3.70 | Top 10% | African-American | 100.0% |
| 2008 | MD | 1900 | 3.95 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 99.3% |
| 2008 | PA | 1870 | 3.60 | Unknown | Caucasian | 91.8% |
| 2008 | NY | 1830 | 3.70 | Unknown | Caucasian | 92.2% |
| 2008 | NJ | 1830 | 3.35 | Top 30% | South Asian | 60.1% |
| 2008 | PA | 1780 | 3.61 | Top 30% | Caucasian | 69.0% |
| 2008 | (Private) | 1780 | 3.32 | Unknown | None Indicated | 79.6% |
| 2008 | PA | 1780 | 3.03 | Top 40% | Caucasian | 19.9% |
| 2008 | XX | 1780 | 3.55 | Unknown | South Asian | 87.0% |
| 2008 | NY | 1770 | 3.60 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 83.6% |
| 2008 | PA | 1770 | 3.00 | Top 30% | East Asian | 33.8% |
| 2008 | TX | 1720 | 3.20 | Unknown | Caucasian | 75.2% |
| 2008 | NJ | 1720 | 3.10 | Bottom 50% | None Indicated | 9.0% |
| 2008 | NJ | 1700 | 3.50 | Top 30% | Caucasian | 55.1% |
| 2008 | OH | 1600 | 3.50 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 70.6% |
| 2008 | NJ | 1530 | 2.95 | Bottom 50% | Caucasian | 3.0% |
| 2008 | NJ | 1480 | 3.73 | Top 25% | African-American | 100.0% |
| 2008 | AK | 1200 | 2.00 | Top 1% | None Indicated | 4.4% |
| 2008 | CA | 31 | 3.46 | Unknown | Caucasian | 95.0% |
| 2008 | NJ | 26 | 3.30 | Unknown | Caucasian | 79.3% |
| 2008 | NY | 26 | 3.65 | Top 20% | None Indicated | 85.2% |
| 2008 | CO | 24 | 3.86 | Top 30% | Hispanic | 100.0% |
| 2007 | NJ | 2110 | 3.64 | Unknown | Hispanic | 100.0% |
| 2007 | NY | 2090 | 3.20 | Unknown | Caucasian | 92.0% |
| 2007 | CT | 2050 | 3.65 | Top 5% | Other | 98.4% |
| 2007 | MD | 2010 | 4.00 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 99.2% |
| 2007 | NY | 1860 | 3.20 | Top 40% | Caucasian | 34.5% |
| 2007 | PA | 1780 | 3.50 | Bottom 50% | East Asian | 24.7% |
| 2007 | CA | 1760 | 3.10 | Unknown | Caucasian | 74.4% |
| 2007 | MA | 1650 | 3.20 | Top 40% | Caucasian | 17.5% |
| 2007 | TX | 28 | 3.70 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 91.1% |
| 2006 | XX | 1800 | 3.60 | Top 30% | South Asian | 70.4% |
|
| 2012 | WV | 2400 | 4.00 | Class Not Ranked | African-American | 100.0% |
| 2012 | PA | 2370 | 3.95 | Top 4% | Caucasian | 99.8% |
| 2012 | IL | 2300 | 3.45 | Top 40% | East Asian | 86.5% |
| 2012 | PA | 2300 | 4.00 | Top 2% | Caucasian | 100.0% |
| 2012 | LA | 2260 | 4.00 | Valedictorian | Caucasian | 99.8% |
| 2012 | PA | 2210 | 4.00 | Valedictorian | East Asian | 99.8% |
| 2012 | NJ | 2200 | 3.80 | Class Not Ranked | East Asian | 98.7% |
| 2012 | XX | 2200 | 3.68 | Class Not Ranked | South Asian | 98.3% |
| 2012 | CT | 2190 | 3.30 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 97.7% |
| 2012 | GA | 2180 | 3.80 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 99.1% |
| 2012 | MN | 2170 | 3.70 | Unknown | Caucasian | 98.1% |
| 2012 | VA | 2120 | 3.80 | Top 5% | East Asian | 99.2% |
| 2012 | NJ | 2110 | 3.60 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 96.9% |
| 2012 | NJ | 2080 | 3.10 | Unknown | Caucasian | 89.6% |
| 2012 | PA | 2040 | 3.00 | Unknown | Caucasian | 85.1% |
| 2012 | PA | 2000 | 3.75 | Class Not Ranked | None Indicated | 99.8% |
| 2012 | VA | 1950 | 3.07 | Unknown | Middle-Eastern | 82.0% |
| 2012 | PA | 1920 | 3.70 | Top 15% | Caucasian | 94.6% |
| 2012 | PA | 1880 | 3.70 | Bottom 50% | East Asian | 58.8% |
| 2012 | WA | 1840 | 3.80 | Top 15% | East Asian | 94.0% |
| 2012 | NC | 1840 | 3.20 | Top 30% | Caucasian | 94.8% |
| 2012 | TX | 1810 | 3.55 | Unknown | South Asian | 88.4% |
| 2012 | PA | 1800 | 3.90 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 97.4% |
| 2012 | PA | 1790 | 3.50 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 80.6% |
| 2012 | PA | 1780 | 4.00 | Top 1% | South Asian | 98.4% |
| 2012 | NJ | 1700 | 3.10 | Top 20% | Hispanic | 100.0% |
| 2012 | PA | 1630 | 3.50 | Top 40% | Caucasian | 86.5% |
| 2012 | XX | 1500 | 3.20 | Top 30% | Caucasian | 20.2% |
| 2012 | MI | 34 | 3.87 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 99.4% |
| 2012 | CO | 32 | 2.80 | Bottom 50% | Hispanic | 99.9% |
| 2012 | IL | 30 | 3.70 | Top 1% | Caucasian | 98.8% |
| 2012 | VA | 29 | 3.50 | Bottom 50% | South Asian | 40.7% |
| 2012 | IN | 28 | 3.16 | Top 30% | Caucasian | 55.6% |
| 2012 | MN | 27 | 3.49 | Class Not Ranked | East Asian | 87.9% |
| 2011 | PA | 2390 | 4.00 | Valedictorian | Caucasian | 99.9% |
| 2011 | PA | 2370 | 4.00 | Top 1% | Caucasian | 99.9% |
| 2011 | NJ | 2320 | 3.80 | Class Not Ranked | East Asian | 99.2% |
| 2011 | CA | 2300 | 4.00 | Top 5% | South Asian | 99.8% |
| 2011 | FL | 2280 | 3.90 | Top 10% | East Asian | 99.5% |
| 2011 | CA | 2270 | 3.40 | Unknown | Caucasian | 97.6% |
| 2011 | MD | 2260 | 3.80 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 99.3% |
| 2011 | NJ | 2260 | 3.70 | Top 15% | Middle-Eastern | 98.7% |
| 2011 | XX | 2250 | 3.00 | Top 10% | South Asian | 95.6% |
| 2011 | XX | 2250 | 3.75 | Top 10% | None Indicated | 99.2% |
| 2011 | MD | 2250 | 4.00 | Top 1% | South Asian | 99.8% |
| 2011 | PA | 2220 | 3.95 | Top 3% | South Asian | 99.7% |
| 2011 | PA | 2210 | 3.50 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 98.3% |
| 2011 | NC | 2200 | 3.90 | Top 1% | African-American | 100.0% |
| 2011 | NY | 2200 | 3.35 | Class Not Ranked | East Asian | 96.3% |
| 2011 | NJ | 2200 | 3.64 | Class Not Ranked | South Asian | 98.1% |
| 2011 | (Private) | 2190 | 3.80 | Top 35% | Caucasian | 93.2% |
| 2011 | PA | 2190 | 4.00 | Valedictorian | Caucasian | 99.7% |
| 2011 | CA | 2180 | 3.90 | Top 10% | South Asian | 99.2% |
| 2011 | PA | 2180 | 4.00 | Top 3% | Caucasian | 99.7% |
| 2011 | NH | 2180 | 3.60 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 98.5% |
| 2011 | NY | 2170 | 3.90 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 99.5% |
| 2011 | TX | 2160 | 3.92 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 99.2% |
| 2011 | PA | 2160 | 3.50 | Top 25% | Caucasian | 93.1% |
| 2011 | VA | 2160 | 3.80 | Top 10% | African-American | 100.0% |
| 2011 | CT | 2150 | 4.00 | Top 10% | South Asian | 99.3% |
| 2011 | VA | 2150 | 3.40 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 97.3% |
| 2011 | FL | 2140 | 3.70 | Top 10% | Other | 98.6% |
| 2011 | MA | 2140 | 3.57 | Unknown | Caucasian | 97.1% |
| 2011 | NJ | 2140 | 3.90 | Top 3% | East Asian | 99.5% |
| 2011 | MA | 2130 | 3.70 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 96.7% |
| 2011 | PA | 2120 | 3.67 | Class Not Ranked | East Asian | 97.5% |
| 2011 | CA | 2110 | 3.50 | Top 20% | East Asian | 94.8% |
| 2011 | NJ | 2110 | 3.70 | Unknown | East Asian | 97.6% |
| 2011 | NJ | 2110 | 3.90 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 99.0% |
| 2011 | PA | 2100 | 3.71 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 98.3% |
| 2011 | NJ | 2100 | 3.00 | Bottom 50% | Caucasian | 29.0% |
| 2011 | PA | 2100 | 3.90 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 99.3% |
| 2011 | DE | 2100 | 3.70 | Unknown | Caucasian | 97.5% |
| 2011 | CA | 2090 | 3.81 | Class Not Ranked | East Asian | 98.0% |
| 2011 | XX | 2080 | 3.26 | Class Not Ranked | South Asian | 92.6% |
| 2011 | MD | 2080 | 3.40 | Class Not Ranked | South Asian | 94.5% |
| 2011 | NY | 2070 | 3.90 | Top 4% | Caucasian | 99.3% |
| 2011 | VA | 2070 | 3.58 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 94.4% |
| 2011 | MD | 2060 | 3.70 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 98.0% |
| 2011 | NY | 2060 | 3.95 | Top 5% | African-American | 100.0% |
| 2011 | NC | 2050 | 3.50 | Unknown | Caucasian | 95.1% |
| 2011 | MD | 2040 | 3.67 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 97.7% |
| 2011 | MD | 2020 | 3.14 | Top 25% | Caucasian | 76.0% |
| 2011 | VA | 2020 | 3.25 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 90.4% |
| 2011 | MD | 2020 | 3.76 | Top 15% | Caucasian | 96.9% |
| 2011 | VA | 2010 | 3.10 | Unknown | Caucasian | 89.2% |
| 2011 | PA | 2010 | 3.80 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 98.0% |
| 2011 | GA | 2010 | 3.00 | Unknown | African-American | 100.0% |
| 2011 | FL | 2000 | 3.90 | Top 2% | Caucasian | 99.4% |
| 2011 | TN | 1990 | 3.68 | Class Not Ranked | None Indicated | 95.8% |
| 2011 | VA | 1990 | 3.30 | Unknown | Caucasian | 90.3% |
| 2011 | VA | 1990 | 3.98 | Top 1% | Caucasian | 99.3% |
| 2011 | MD | 1980 | 2.75 | Top 25% | Caucasian | 51.7% |
| 2011 | CT | 1980 | 3.70 | Top 15% | Caucasian | 95.8% |
| 2011 | MA | 1960 | 3.30 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 84.3% |
| 2011 | PA | 1960 | 3.40 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 91.2% |
| 2011 | CA | 1960 | 3.60 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 91.6% |
| 2011 | NJ | 1950 | 3.95 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 98.6% |
| 2011 | NY | 1950 | 3.52 | Unknown | Caucasian | 92.9% |
| 2011 | CA | 1950 | 3.30 | Class Not Ranked | South Asian | 88.7% |
| 2011 | VA | 1950 | 3.65 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 99.5% |
| 2011 | NV | 1950 | 3.50 | Unknown | Caucasian | 92.6% |
| 2011 | PA | 1940 | 3.80 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 94.1% |
| 2011 | NJ | 1930 | 3.35 | Top 30% | Caucasian | 69.9% |
| 2011 | NJ | 1920 | 3.60 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 93.3% |
| 2011 | (Private) | 1920 | 3.22 | Top 35% | Caucasian | 94.7% |
| 2011 | MA | 1910 | 3.64 | Top 15% | Other | 93.6% |
| 2011 | PA | 1910 | 3.89 | Top 15% | Caucasian | 96.4% |
| 2011 | PA | 1900 | 3.40 | Top 40% | East Asian | 50.0% |
| 2011 | NJ | 1890 | 3.45 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 92.9% |
| 2011 | NJ | 1870 | 3.59 | Top 20% | Hispanic | 100.0% |
| 2011 | PA | 1870 | 3.76 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 94.2% |
| 2011 | PA | 1870 | 3.67 | Top 10% | South Asian | 95.2% |
| 2011 | NV | 1860 | 2.80 | Unknown | Caucasian | 62.1% |
| 2011 | PA | 1860 | 3.70 | Top 15% | Caucasian | 93.1% |
| 2011 | MD | 1850 | 3.00 | Class Not Ranked | Other | 71.6% |
| 2011 | MD | 1850 | 3.86 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 92.6% |
| 2011 | PA | 1840 | 4.00 | Top 15% | Caucasian | 96.2% |
| 2011 | PA | 1830 | 3.80 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 90.9% |
| 2011 | PA | 1830 | 3.24 | Unknown | Caucasian | 80.2% |
| 2011 | NY | 1820 | 3.70 | Class Not Ranked | Middle-Eastern | 92.0% |
| 2011 | PA | 1820 | 3.40 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 85.0% |
| 2011 | CT | 1820 | 3.00 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 68.9% |
| 2011 | (Private) | 1810 | 3.75 | Top 4% | Caucasian | 96.8% |
| 2011 | PA | 1800 | 3.50 | Top 30% | Caucasian | 78.3% |
| 2011 | (Private) | 1800 | 3.60 | Top 30% | Caucasian | 82.0% |
| 2011 | NJ | 1800 | 3.30 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 73.0% |
| 2011 | MD | 1800 | 3.40 | Unknown | South Asian | 83.8% |
| 2011 | VA | 1800 | 3.25 | Top 30% | Caucasian | 51.2% |
| 2011 | PA | 1800 | 3.70 | Top 20% | Middle-Eastern | 87.3% |
| 2011 | MD | 1790 | 3.40 | Unknown | Caucasian | 83.2% |
| 2011 | MD | 1780 | 2.70 | Class Not Ranked | Hispanic | 100.0% |
| 2011 | PA | 1770 | 3.50 | Top 30% | Caucasian | 62.3% |
| 2011 | CA | 1770 | 3.14 | Unknown | Caucasian | 71.1% |
| 2011 | NY | 1770 | 3.00 | Bottom 30% | Caucasian | 1.8% |
| 2011 | PA | 1770 | 3.57 | Top 30% | Caucasian | 66.1% |
| 2011 | NJ | 1770 | 3.20 | Top 20% | Hispanic | 100.0% |
| 2011 | PA | 1750 | 3.40 | Top 30% | Caucasian | 58.3% |
| 2011 | PA | 1740 | 3.64 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 91.2% |
| 2011 | CA | 1730 | 3.17 | Unknown | East Asian | 69.1% |
| 2011 | PA | 1720 | 3.90 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 94.7% |
| 2011 | VA | 1720 | 3.50 | Top 20% | African-American | 100.0% |
| 2011 | MD | 1720 | 3.20 | Unknown | Caucasian | 69.5% |
| 2011 | NJ | 1710 | 3.50 | Unknown | Caucasian | 81.6% |
| 2011 | MD | 1700 | 4.00 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 95.4% |
| 2011 | MA | 1700 | 2.73 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 41.1% |
| 2011 | NJ | 1690 | 3.40 | Bottom 50% | Middle-Eastern | 14.9% |
| 2011 | NH | 1680 | 3.10 | Top 40% | Caucasian | 16.0% |
| 2011 | FL | 1670 | 3.67 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 97.3% |
| 2011 | PA | 1670 | 3.87 | Top 5% | African-American | 100.0% |
| 2011 | PA | 1670 | 3.76 | Top 15% | Caucasian | 87.3% |
| 2011 | WA | 1660 | 3.50 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 78.0% |
| 2011 | MD | 1650 | 3.90 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 97.3% |
| 2011 | PA | 1650 | 3.48 | Bottom 50% | South Asian | 74.6% |
| 2011 | NJ | 1640 | 2.74 | Bottom 50% | Caucasian | 2.9% |
| 2011 | FL | 1640 | 3.50 | Top 25% | Caucasian | 58.8% |
| 2011 | NH | 1630 | 3.53 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 76.9% |
| 2011 | TX | 1610 | 4.00 | Top 25% | Caucasian | 86.9% |
| 2011 | NJ | 1610 | 3.10 | Unknown | Caucasian | 53.0% |
| 2011 | PA | 1610 | 3.90 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 88.0% |
| 2011 | PA | 1600 | 3.40 | Top 35% | African-American | 100.0% |
| 2011 | MA | 1600 | 3.58 | Top 25% | South Asian | 71.3% |
| 2011 | NJ | 1600 | 3.50 | Top 30% | Caucasian | 44.0% |
| 2011 | NJ | 1600 | 2.95 | Bottom 40% | Caucasian | 1.8% |
| 2011 | FL | 1590 | 3.90 | Top 5% | Hispanic | 100.0% |
| 2011 | VA | 1570 | 3.40 | Top 40% | Caucasian | 19.3% |
| 2011 | PA | 1560 | 3.40 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 64.6% |
| 2011 | CA | 1550 | 3.34 | Unknown | Caucasian | 76.4% |
| 2011 | NJ | 1540 | 3.76 | Top 10% | Hispanic | 100.0% |
| 2011 | PA | 1530 | 3.68 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 82.4% |
| 2011 | NJ | 1530 | 3.47 | Top 30% | Hispanic | 100.0% |
| 2011 | NJ | 1500 | 3.70 | Top 30% | Other | 45.0% |
| 2011 | MD | 1480 | 3.73 | Top 15% | South Asian | 73.6% |
| 2011 | CA | 1470 | 3.66 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 69.4% |
| 2011 | NJ | 1460 | 3.89 | Top 5% | Hispanic | 100.0% |
| 2011 | MD | 1440 | 4.00 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 91.0% |
| 2011 | PA | 1410 | 4.00 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 85.5% |
| 2011 | PA | 1280 | 3.72 | Class Not Ranked | Hispanic | 100.0% |
| 2011 | CT | 1170 | 3.50 | Unknown | Hispanic | 100.0% |
| 2011 | CT | 32 | 3.78 | Top 5% | South Asian | 99.2% |
| 2011 | CA | 32 | 3.90 | Unknown | Caucasian | 98.6% |
| 2011 | IL | 31 | 3.90 | Top 2% | Caucasian | 99.4% |
| 2011 | (Private) | 31 | 3.60 | Class Not Ranked | Hispanic | 100.0% |
| 2011 | MI | 30 | 3.80 | Unknown | Caucasian | 97.0% |
| 2011 | IL | 27 | 3.60 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 86.1% |
| 2011 | CO | 27 | 3.30 | Top 25% | Hispanic | 100.0% |
| 2011 | FL | 27 | 3.40 | Top 30% | Hispanic | 100.0% |
| 2011 | NY | 27 | 3.70 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 88.7% |
| 2011 | OH | 26 | 3.40 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 82.9% |
| 2011 | FL | 21 | 3.34 | Unknown | Caucasian | 53.4% |
| 2010 | NJ | 2400 | 4.00 | Valedictorian | Hispanic | 100.0% |
| 2010 | PA | 2360 | 4.00 | Top 2% | Caucasian | 99.9% |
| 2010 | NJ | 2350 | 3.70 | Top 10% | South Asian | 99.4% |
| 2010 | WA | 2330 | 3.98 | Top 1% | Other | 99.8% |
| 2010 | MA | 2330 | 3.80 | Top 1% | Caucasian | 99.8% |
| 2010 | ME | 2320 | 3.80 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 98.9% |
| 2010 | PA | 2320 | 4.00 | Top 1% | East Asian | 99.8% |
| 2010 | NJ | 2320 | 3.97 | Top 1% | None Indicated | 99.8% |
| 2010 | XX | 2310 | 3.98 | Top 1% | None Indicated | 99.8% |
| 2010 | PA | 2310 | 3.40 | Top 20% | South Asian | 96.9% |
| 2010 | CT | 2300 | 3.80 | Top 3% | Caucasian | 99.7% |
| 2010 | PA | 2300 | 3.93 | Top 5% | East Asian | 99.7% |
| 2010 | NJ | 2290 | 3.60 | Class Not Ranked | East Asian | 98.6% |
| 2010 | NJ | 2280 | 3.60 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 99.0% |
| 2010 | NJ | 2280 | 3.68 | Class Not Ranked | East Asian | 98.8% |
| 2010 | NJ | 2270 | 3.80 | Top 1% | Caucasian | 99.7% |
| 2010 | VA | 2270 | 3.95 | Top 5% | South Asian | 99.7% |
| 2010 | MD | 2260 | 3.58 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 98.9% |
| 2010 | PA | 2250 | 3.75 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 99.5% |
| 2010 | NJ | 2250 | 3.90 | Class Not Ranked | South Asian | 99.2% |
| 2010 | PA | 2250 | 3.75 | Top 1% | Caucasian | 99.6% |
| 2010 | PA | 2250 | 3.80 | Top 15% | Caucasian | 98.9% |
| 2010 | WI | 2250 | 3.72 | Class Not Ranked | South Asian | 98.7% |
| 2010 | MD | 2250 | 3.81 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 98.4% |
| 2010 | PA | 2240 | 4.00 | Top 3% | None Indicated | 99.7% |
| 2010 | MN | 2230 | 3.67 | Unknown | East Asian | 98.4% |
| 2010 | MD | 2230 | 3.76 | Top 15% | Caucasian | 98.7% |
| 2010 | GA | 2230 | 4.00 | Top 3% | Caucasian | 99.7% |
| 2010 | OH | 2220 | 3.85 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 100.0% |
| 2010 | CA | 2220 | 3.92 | Top 10% | South Asian | 99.4% |
| 2010 | MD | 2220 | 3.27 | Bottom 50% | Caucasian | 56.4% |
| 2010 | PA | 2220 | 4.00 | Top 2% | South Asian | 99.7% |
| 2010 | CA | 2210 | 3.68 | Unknown | East Asian | 98.3% |
| 2010 | MA | 2210 | 3.50 | Top 15% | Caucasian | 97.5% |
| 2010 | MD | 2210 | 3.30 | Top 25% | Caucasian | 91.4% |
| 2010 | PA | 2210 | 3.92 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 100.0% |
| 2010 | NY | 2210 | 3.83 | Unknown | None Indicated | 98.8% |
| 2010 | CA | 2200 | 4.00 | Top 1% | Caucasian | 99.7% |
| 2010 | VA | 2200 | 3.50 | Valedictorian | Caucasian | 99.2% |
| 2010 | NJ | 2200 | 3.80 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 99.1% |
| 2010 | PA | 2200 | 3.90 | Salutatorian | Caucasian | 99.7% |
| 2010 | CT | 2200 | 3.25 | Top 30% | East Asian | 85.5% |
| 2010 | NJ | 2190 | 3.66 | Top 5% | East Asian | 99.2% |
| 2010 | MA | 2190 | 3.10 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 90.2% |
| 2010 | FL | 2190 | 3.70 | Top 5% | None Indicated | 99.2% |
| 2010 | PA | 2190 | 3.90 | Valedictorian | Caucasian | 99.7% |
| 2010 | MA | 2180 | 3.75 | Top 5% | South Asian | 99.3% |
| 2010 | NJ | 2180 | 3.61 | Class Not Ranked | South Asian | 97.8% |
| 2010 | CT | 2180 | 3.50 | Top 20% | East Asian | 95.8% |
| 2010 | OH | 2180 | 3.60 | Top 30% | Hispanic | 100.0% |
| 2010 | PA | 2180 | 4.00 | Salutatorian | Caucasian | 99.7% |
| 2010 | VA | 2180 | 4.00 | Top 10% | East Asian | 99.4% |
| 2010 | NJ | 2170 | 3.67 | Top 10% | South Asian | 98.7% |
| 2010 | NJ | 2170 | 3.50 | Top 25% | Caucasian | 93.4% |
| 2010 | CT | 2170 | 3.60 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 98.4% |
| 2010 | NY | 2170 | 3.70 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 98.1% |
| 2010 | PA | 2170 | 3.68 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 99.1% |
| 2010 | NJ | 2160 | 3.90 | Top 2% | Hispanic | 100.0% |
| 2010 | XX | 2160 | 3.62 | Top 5% | East Asian | 99.0% |
| 2010 | NV | 2150 | 3.76 | Top 10% | East Asian | 99.0% |
| 2010 | PA | 2150 | 3.92 | Top 10% | None Indicated | 100.0% |
| 2010 | XX | 2150 | 4.00 | Class Not Ranked | East Asian | 99.0% |
| 2010 | MD | 2150 | 4.00 | Valedictorian | Caucasian | 99.7% |
| 2010 | NY | 2140 | 3.15 | Bottom 50% | East Asian | 46.1% |
| 2010 | PA | 2140 | 3.94 | Class Not Ranked | South Asian | 98.8% |
| 2010 | AZ | 2140 | 3.71 | Unknown | Caucasian | 97.9% |
| 2010 | NJ | 2140 | 3.40 | Unknown | South Asian | 95.7% |
| 2010 | PA | 2140 | 3.68 | Top 5% | East Asian | 99.0% |
| 2010 | NY | 2130 | 3.76 | Top 10% | East Asian | 98.7% |
| 2010 | PA | 2130 | 3.74 | Class Not Ranked | East Asian | 98.0% |
| 2010 | PA | 2130 | 4.00 | Top 1% | Caucasian | 100.0% |
| 2010 | PA | 2130 | 3.90 | Top 10% | South Asian | 99.1% |
| 2010 | NJ | 2130 | 3.74 | Unknown | Caucasian | 98.0% |
| 2010 | WA | 2130 | 4.00 | Valedictorian | Other | 99.7% |
| 2010 | XX | 2120 | 3.90 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 99.2% |
| 2010 | XX | 2120 | 3.63 | Top 20% | East Asian | 95.9% |
| 2010 | PA | 2120 | 4.00 | Valedictorian | Caucasian | 99.7% |
| 2010 | CA | 2110 | 3.94 | Top 3% | Caucasian | 99.5% |
| 2010 | PA | 2110 | 3.30 | Top 15% | Caucasian | 94.0% |
| 2010 | PA | 2110 | 3.90 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 99.3% |
| 2010 | MA | 2110 | 3.80 | Top 1% | Caucasian | 99.4% |
| 2010 | TX | 2110 | 3.89 | Top 15% | South Asian | 98.4% |
| 2010 | MD | 2100 | 3.70 | Top 3% | Caucasian | 99.2% |
| 2010 | OH | 2100 | 4.00 | Valedictorian | Other | 99.7% |
| 2010 | CO | 2100 | 3.70 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 98.3% |
| 2010 | PA | 2100 | 3.90 | Top 2% | South Asian | 99.4% |
| 2010 | PA | 2100 | 3.62 | Top 5% | East Asian | 98.6% |
| 2010 | NJ | 2100 | 2.93 | Top 15% | African-American | 100.0% |
| 2010 | VA | 2100 | 3.50 | Top 30% | South Asian | 87.4% |
| 2010 | VA | 2080 | 3.52 | Unknown | Caucasian | 97.4% |
| 2010 | NJ | 2080 | 3.83 | Class Not Ranked | South Asian | 97.9% |
| 2010 | CA | 2080 | 3.45 | Unknown | Other | 95.1% |
| 2010 | NJ | 2080 | 3.33 | Class Not Ranked | South Asian | 93.6% |
| 2010 | NJ | 2080 | 3.30 | Class Not Ranked | South Asian | 93.2% |
| 2010 | XX | 2080 | 3.70 | Top 5% | East Asian | 98.8% |
| 2010 | PA | 2080 | 3.86 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 99.2% |
| 2010 | MD | 2080 | 3.40 | Unknown | Caucasian | 94.5% |
| 2010 | NY | 2080 | 3.76 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 98.9% |
| 2010 | OK | 2070 | 3.51 | Top 5% | Hispanic | 100.0% |
| 2010 | IL | 2070 | 3.86 | Top 5% | East Asian | 99.3% |
| 2010 | MA | 2070 | 2.90 | Bottom 50% | Caucasian | 22.1% |
| 2010 | NJ | 2070 | 3.68 | Top 15% | Caucasian | 97.0% |
| 2010 | VT | 2070 | 3.40 | Top 30% | Caucasian | 82.8% |
| 2010 | XX | 2070 | 3.60 | Top 30% | East Asian | 88.5% |
| 2010 | CT | 2060 | 3.00 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 99.0% |
| 2010 | LA | 2060 | 3.75 | Top 30% | Caucasian | 91.3% |
| 2010 | NJ | 2060 | 3.50 | Bottom 50% | Caucasian | 52.7% |
| 2010 | PA | 2060 | 3.75 | Top 10% | Hispanic | 100.0% |
| 2010 | MA | 2060 | 3.20 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 86.9% |
| 2010 | VA | 2050 | 3.60 | Top 10% | East Asian | 97.6% |
| 2010 | MA | 2050 | 3.00 | Top 25% | Caucasian | 72.2% |
| 2010 | MD | 2050 | 3.71 | Top 10% | East Asian | 97.9% |
| 2010 | GA | 2050 | 3.82 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 98.4% |
| 2010 | NJ | 2050 | 3.56 | Class Not Ranked | East Asian | 95.7% |
| 2010 | PA | 2050 | 4.00 | Valedictorian | Caucasian | 99.5% |
| 2010 | PA | 2050 | 3.78 | Top 2% | Caucasian | 99.1% |
| 2010 | NJ | 2050 | 3.60 | Top 4% | Caucasian | 98.4% |
| 2010 | NJ | 2050 | 3.34 | Top 20% | Middle-Eastern | 89.7% |
| 2010 | CA | 2040 | 3.59 | Class Not Ranked | East Asian | 98.4% |
| 2010 | TN | 2040 | 3.66 | Top 30% | Caucasian | 88.6% |
| 2010 | NJ | 2040 | 3.50 | Top 25% | East Asian | 89.0% |
| 2010 | MD | 2040 | 3.97 | Top 2% | Caucasian | 99.4% |
| 2010 | PA | 2040 | 3.60 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 93.9% |
| 2010 | MD | 2040 | 3.76 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 95.7% |
| 2010 | FL | 2030 | 3.40 | Unknown | Caucasian | 94.3% |
| 2010 | PA | 2030 | 3.40 | Top 40% | Caucasian | 63.9% |
| 2010 | (Private) | 2030 | 2.90 | Class Not Ranked | East Asian | 81.3% |
| 2010 | XX | 2030 | 3.69 | Top 10% | East Asian | 97.7% |
| 2010 | MD | 2030 | 3.71 | Top 25% | Caucasian | 92.7% |
| 2010 | NJ | 2030 | 3.52 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 96.6% |
| 2010 | (Private) | 2030 | 3.70 | Unknown | Caucasian | 96.6% |
| 2010 | PA | 2020 | 3.80 | Top 3% | Caucasian | 99.1% |
| 2010 | PA | 2020 | 3.36 | Top 15% | Caucasian | 99.5% |
| 2010 | CT | 2020 | 3.80 | Top 15% | Caucasian | 97.2% |
| 2010 | VA | 2020 | 3.65 | Top 15% | East Asian | 96.0% |
| 2010 | XX | 2020 | 3.96 | Top 5% | East Asian | 99.1% |
| 2010 | PA | 2020 | 3.75 | Top 15% | East Asian | 96.8% |
| 2010 | MD | 2020 | 4.00 | Top 1% | Caucasian | 99.4% |
| 2010 | NH | 2010 | 2.96 | Top 40% | Caucasian | 36.5% |
| 2010 | NH | 2010 | 3.53 | Top 25% | East Asian | 88.4% |
| 2010 | NY | 2010 | 3.90 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 98.4% |
| 2010 | NJ | 2010 | 3.54 | Top 4% | Caucasian | 97.8% |
| 2010 | SC | 2000 | 3.70 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 94.5% |
| 2010 | NJ | 2000 | 3.40 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 89.1% |
| 2010 | VA | 2000 | 3.70 | Class Not Ranked | East Asian | 96.2% |
| 2010 | (Private) | 2000 | 3.93 | Top 5% | East Asian | 99.0% |
| 2010 | NY | 2000 | 3.90 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 97.6% |
| 2010 | NJ | 2000 | 3.60 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 95.2% |
| 2010 | PA | 2000 | 3.60 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 92.9% |
| 2010 | AZ | 2000 | 0.00 | Top 2% | Caucasian | 1.2% |
| 2010 | CA | 2000 | 3.20 | Bottom 50% | East Asian | 29.8% |
| 2010 | PA | 2000 | 3.65 | Class Not Ranked | Native American | 100.0% |
| 2010 | MD | 2000 | 3.74 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 94.8% |
| 2010 | NJ | 1990 | 3.30 | Class Not Ranked | South Asian | 90.3% |
| 2010 | PA | 1990 | 3.30 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 90.3% |
| 2010 | (Private) | 1990 | 4.00 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 99.1% |
| 2010 | VA | 1990 | 3.25 | Unknown | Hispanic | 100.0% |
| 2010 | MD | 1990 | 3.30 | Top 25% | East Asian | 80.2% |
| 2010 | PA | 1990 | 2.98 | Bottom 50% | Caucasian | 19.4% |
| 2010 | NJ | 1990 | 3.60 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 94.9% |
| 2010 | NJ | 1990 | 3.72 | Top 20% | South Asian | 94.3% |
| 2010 | CA | 1980 | 3.85 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 98.2% |
| 2010 | VA | 1980 | 3.79 | Unknown | South Asian | 96.6% |
| 2010 | PA | 1980 | 3.65 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 97.9% |
| 2010 | PA | 1980 | 4.00 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 98.6% |
| 2010 | MD | 1980 | 3.00 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 81.5% |
| 2010 | NJ | 1980 | 3.40 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 88.2% |
| 2010 | FL | 1980 | 3.32 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 86.1% |
| 2010 | NJ | 1980 | 3.75 | Top 20% | East Asian | 94.4% |
| 2010 | PA | 1970 | 4.00 | Top 1% | Caucasian | 99.3% |
| 2010 | NJ | 1970 | 3.55 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 93.9% |
| 2010 | NY | 1970 | 3.50 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 93.2% |
| 2010 | VA | 1970 | 3.00 | Unknown | Hispanic | 100.0% |
| 2010 | FL | 1970 | 3.75 | Class Not Ranked | Hispanic | 100.0% |
| 2010 | PA | 1970 | 3.80 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 99.9% |
| 2010 | VA | 1970 | 4.00 | Valedictorian | Caucasian | 99.4% |
| 2010 | PA | 1960 | 3.80 | Top 5% | Middle-Eastern | 98.4% |
| 2010 | PA | 1960 | 3.80 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 97.6% |
| 2010 | PA | 1960 | 3.75 | Top 15% | Caucasian | 95.9% |
| 2010 | VA | 1960 | 3.00 | Bottom 50% | African-American | 99.9% |
| 2010 | NJ | 1960 | 4.00 | Top 10% | None Indicated | 98.5% |
| 2010 | NJ | 1960 | 3.90 | Top 3% | Caucasian | 99.9% |
| 2010 | VA | 1960 | 3.86 | Top 40% | East Asian | 79.2% |
| 2010 | NJ | 1960 | 3.70 | Top 10% | South Asian | 96.9% |
| 2010 | OR | 1960 | 3.85 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 97.8% |
| 2010 | CT | 1950 | 3.40 | Top 10% | South Asian | 95.1% |
| 2010 | CT | 1950 | 3.20 | Unknown | Caucasian | 86.1% |
| 2010 | CT | 1950 | 3.70 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 97.9% |
| 2010 | NJ | 1950 | 3.38 | Bottom 50% | South Asian | 34.2% |
| 2010 | XX | 1950 | 4.00 | Top 2% | South Asian | 99.2% |
| 2010 | PA | 1950 | 4.00 | Top 5% | East Asian | 98.9% |
| 2010 | PA | 1950 | 3.47 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 99.7% |
| 2010 | NJ | 1950 | 4.00 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 98.9% |
| 2010 | PA | 1950 | 3.50 | Top 25% | Caucasian | 98.9% |
| 2010 | NY | 1940 | 3.83 | Top 10% | South Asian | 97.5% |
| 2010 | PA | 1940 | 3.81 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 96.1% |
| 2010 | NJ | 1940 | 2.30 | Class Not Ranked | South Asian | 41.9% |
| 2010 | VA | 1940 | 3.97 | Top 5% | None Indicated | 98.8% |
| 2010 | NJ | 1940 | 3.50 | Class Not Ranked | African-American | 100.0% |
| 2010 | XX | 1940 | 3.60 | Top 10% | East Asian | 95.8% |
| 2010 | PA | 1940 | 3.60 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 95.8% |
| 2010 | PA | 1940 | 3.69 | Top 10% | South Asian | 96.6% |
| 2010 | OH | 1940 | 4.00 | Valedictorian | Caucasian | 99.3% |
| 2010 | PA | 1940 | 3.30 | Top 25% | Caucasian | 98.2% |
| 2010 | MD | 1940 | 3.75 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 97.0% |
| 2010 | NY | 1940 | 3.76 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 95.7% |
| 2010 | NY | 1930 | 3.50 | Unknown | South Asian | 98.0% |
| 2010 | PA | 1930 | 3.90 | Top 3% | Caucasian | 99.3% |
| 2010 | CO | 1930 | 3.30 | Top 25% | Caucasian | 81.6% |
| 2010 | NY | 1930 | 3.60 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 95.6% |
| 2010 | PA | 1930 | 3.75 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 96.9% |
| 2010 | PA | 1930 | 3.20 | Unknown | Hispanic | 100.0% |
| 2010 | CT | 1930 | 3.50 | Top 25% | Caucasian | 83.3% |
| 2010 | PA | 1930 | 3.77 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 98.0% |
| 2010 | NJ | 1930 | 3.46 | Class Not Ranked | East Asian | 91.2% |
| 2010 | MA | 1930 | 3.30 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 82.5% |
| 2010 | NY | 1930 | 3.64 | Unknown | East Asian | 94.1% |
| 2010 | OH | 1930 | 3.65 | Top 25% | Caucasian | 87.6% |
| 2010 | NY | 1920 | 3.70 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 97.5% |
| 2010 | FL | 1920 | 3.10 | Class Not Ranked | South Asian | 83.1% |
| 2010 | AZ | 1920 | 3.61 | Top 5% | African-American | 100.0% |
| 2010 | PA | 1920 | 3.60 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 95.5% |
| 2010 | MD | 1920 | 4.00 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 98.2% |
| 2010 | NY | 1920 | 3.60 | Unknown | Caucasian | 93.3% |
| 2010 | PA | 1920 | 3.25 | Top 25% | Caucasian | 72.7% |
| 2010 | PA | 1920 | 3.50 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 91.7% |
| 2010 | NJ | 1920 | 3.65 | Unknown | East Asian | 94.0% |
| 2010 | MD | 1920 | 3.38 | Top 25% | Caucasian | 78.4% |
| 2010 | NY | 1920 | 2.80 | Unknown | Hispanic | 100.0% |
| 2010 | NY | 1920 | 3.69 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 91.9% |
| 2010 | AZ | 1910 | 3.50 | Top 25% | Caucasian | 90.2% |
| 2010 | CA | 1910 | 3.51 | Top 10% | Other | 96.2% |
| 2010 | FL | 1910 | 3.62 | Top 3% | Hispanic | 100.0% |
| 2010 | NY | 1910 | 2.80 | Bottom 30% | Caucasian | 2.1% |
| 2010 | ME | 1910 | 4.00 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 98.7% |
| 2010 | XX | 1910 | 3.32 | Bottom 50% | Caucasian | 27.6% |
| 2010 | NJ | 1910 | 3.60 | Top 25% | Caucasian | 85.4% |
| 2010 | MD | 1910 | 3.75 | Class Not Ranked | East Asian | 95.0% |
| 2010 | PA | 1910 | 3.70 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 96.2% |
| 2010 | MD | 1910 | 3.70 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 96.2% |
| 2010 | CA | 1910 | 3.75 | Top 25% | East Asian | 89.2% |
| 2010 | VA | 1910 | 3.85 | Top 20% | Hispanic | 100.0% |
| 2010 | NJ | 1900 | 3.90 | Unknown | Caucasian | 97.0% |
| 2010 | NJ | 1900 | 3.09 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 79.3% |
| 2010 | PA | 1900 | 3.95 | Valedictorian | Caucasian | 99.9% |
| 2010 | PA | 1900 | 3.90 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 97.5% |
| 2010 | PA | 1900 | 3.60 | Top 5% | Native American | 100.0% |
| 2010 | VA | 1900 | 3.60 | Top 30% | Caucasian | 78.5% |
| 2010 | NJ | 1890 | 3.29 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 90.9% |
| 2010 | IL | 1890 | 3.40 | Salutatorian | Caucasian | 97.8% |
| 2010 | NJ | 1890 | 4.00 | Top 2% | Hispanic | 100.0% |
| 2010 | PA | 1890 | 3.85 | Top 1% | Caucasian | 98.9% |
| 2010 | AZ | 1890 | 4.00 | Top 3% | East Asian | 98.8% |
| 2010 | CT | 1890 | 3.35 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 81.8% |
| 2010 | XX | 1890 | 4.00 | Top 5% | East Asian | 98.6% |
| 2010 | NJ | 1890 | 3.52 | Top 25% | Caucasian | 81.5% |
| 2010 | CA | 1890 | 3.40 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 88.4% |
| 2010 | MA | 1890 | 3.60 | Top 15% | Caucasian | 92.4% |
| 2010 | MD | 1890 | 3.95 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 94.8% |
| 2010 | PA | 1890 | 4.00 | Top 4% | Caucasian | 98.7% |
| 2010 | PA | 1890 | 3.80 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 99.8% |
| 2010 | NJ | 1890 | 2.90 | Top 20% | Hispanic | 100.0% |
| 2010 | NY | 1890 | 3.70 | Top 20% | Hispanic | 100.0% |
| 2010 | CA | 1880 | 3.50 | Top 30% | Hispanic | 100.0% |
| 2010 | CO | 1880 | 3.30 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 90.1% |
| 2010 | NY | 1880 | 3.60 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 99.5% |
| 2010 | MD | 1880 | 3.65 | Unknown | African-American | 100.0% |
| 2010 | MD | 1880 | 3.10 | Top 25% | Caucasian | 61.3% |
| 2010 | FL | 1880 | 3.06 | Bottom 10% | African-American | 96.1% |
| 2010 | VA | 1880 | 3.50 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 90.3% |
| 2010 | PA | 1880 | 3.18 | Unknown | Caucasian | 98.6% |
| 2010 | MA | 1880 | 3.83 | Top 10% | Hispanic | 100.0% |
| 2010 | NY | 1880 | 4.00 | Unknown | East Asian | 96.8% |
| 2010 | PA | 1880 | 2.98 | Unknown | South Asian | 73.3% |
| 2010 | NY | 1870 | 3.70 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 98.1% |
| 2010 | IL | 1870 | 3.45 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 88.0% |
| 2010 | NJ | 1870 | 3.60 | Top 25% | Caucasian | 82.9% |
| 2010 | NJ | 1870 | 3.63 | Top 15% | Caucasian | 92.3% |
| 2010 | PA | 1870 | 3.44 | Top 30% | Caucasian | 68.8% |
| 2010 | NJ | 1870 | 3.48 | Top 35% | Caucasian | 61.6% |
| 2010 | VA | 1860 | 3.72 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 95.6% |
| 2010 | MA | 1860 | 3.80 | Top 3% | South Asian | 97.9% |
| 2010 | NH | 1860 | 3.60 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 94.2% |
| 2010 | MD | 1850 | 2.30 | Unknown | African-American | 100.0% |
| 2010 | PA | 1850 | 3.80 | Top 10% | East Asian | 96.7% |
| 2010 | OH | 1850 | 3.40 | Top 30% | Caucasian | 65.0% |
| 2010 | CT | 1850 | 3.60 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 91.2% |
| 2010 | CT | 1850 | 3.60 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 91.2% |
| 2010 | CO | 1840 | 3.60 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 90.7% |
| 2010 | NJ | 1840 | 3.50 | Top 30% | Caucasian | 69.0% |
| 2010 | MA | 1840 | 3.63 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 94.1% |
| 2010 | PA | 1840 | 3.30 | Top 35% | East Asian | 48.0% |
| 2010 | NY | 1840 | 2.80 | Class Not Ranked | Hispanic | 100.0% |
| 2010 | PA | 1840 | 3.64 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 94.2% |
| 2010 | PA | 1840 | 3.91 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 97.9% |
| 2010 | NJ | 1830 | 3.83 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 98.4% |
| 2010 | FL | 1830 | 3.66 | Top 10% | East Asian | 95.5% |
| 2010 | CT | 1830 | 3.30 | Top 25% | Caucasian | 67.0% |
| 2010 | MD | 1830 | 3.55 | Top 25% | Caucasian | 78.5% |
| 2010 | PA | 1830 | 3.68 | Top 15% | Caucasian | 91.9% |
| 2010 | PA | 1830 | 3.80 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 99.4% |
| 2010 | PA | 1820 | 3.30 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 87.1% |
| 2010 | PA | 1820 | 2.99 | Top 20% | South Asian | 58.8% |
| 2010 | NJ | 1820 | 3.75 | Top 30% | South Asian | 78.8% |
| 2010 | NJ | 1810 | 3.90 | Top 15% | Caucasian | 95.0% |
| 2010 | PA | 1810 | 3.30 | Bottom 50% | Caucasian | 79.3% |
| 2010 | PA | 1810 | 3.70 | Top 15% | Caucasian | 91.6% |
| 2010 | PA | 1810 | 3.30 | Top 30% | Caucasian | 55.1% |
| 2010 | NJ | 1810 | 2.33 | Unknown | Hispanic | 99.9% |
| 2010 | NJ | 1800 | 3.30 | Top 30% | Caucasian | 57.3% |
| 2010 | MD | 1800 | 3.30 | Top 35% | Hispanic | 100.0% |
| 2010 | NY | 1800 | 3.40 | Unknown | Caucasian | 83.8% |
| 2010 | NJ | 1800 | 3.51 | Top 25% | None Indicated | 74.5% |
| 2010 | MD | 1800 | 3.50 | Top 5% | East Asian | 93.7% |
| 2010 | (Private) | 1800 | 3.76 | Class Not Ranked | East Asian | 92.3% |
| 2010 | NJ | 1800 | 3.60 | Top 10% | Other | 92.6% |
| 2010 | PA | 1800 | 3.30 | Top 30% | Caucasian | 54.1% |
| 2010 | PA | 1800 | 3.70 | Top 30% | Caucasian | 98.0% |
| 2010 | (Private) | 1800 | 3.40 | Unknown | Caucasian | 83.8% |
| 2010 | PA | 1800 | 3.49 | Top 20% | East Asian | 80.8% |
| 2010 | RI | 1800 | 3.50 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 86.7% |
| 2010 | NJ | 1790 | 3.20 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 78.6% |
| 2010 | NY | 1790 | 3.80 | Top 10% | East Asian | 95.1% |
| 2010 | XX | 1790 | 3.20 | Top 10% | South Asian | 82.5% |
| 2010 | PA | 1790 | 3.60 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 84.0% |
| 2010 | CA | 1790 | 3.76 | Top 10% | African-American | 100.0% |
| 2010 | MD | 1790 | 3.75 | Top 10% | Other | 94.5% |
| 2010 | PA | 1790 | 3.55 | Bottom 50% | Caucasian | 27.9% |
| 2010 | PA | 1780 | 3.75 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 98.0% |
| 2010 | MD | 1780 | 3.41 | Top 30% | Caucasian | 63.5% |
| 2010 | PA | 1780 | 3.85 | Top 10% | South Asian | 95.4% |
| 2010 | XX | 1780 | 3.80 | Top 10% | Middle-Eastern | 94.8% |
| 2010 | MA | 1780 | 0.00 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 0.1% |
| 2010 | NY | 1780 | 3.80 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 94.8% |
| 2010 | MD | 1770 | 3.31 | Unknown | Other | 86.1% |
| 2010 | VA | 1770 | 3.40 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 76.2% |
| 2010 | MD | 1770 | 3.89 | Top 10% | None Indicated | 95.6% |
| 2010 | MD | 1770 | 3.00 | Unknown | Caucasian | 64.0% |
| 2010 | MA | 1770 | 2.90 | Unknown | African-American | 100.0% |
| 2010 | (Private) | 1770 | 2.80 | Class Not Ranked | Hispanic | 100.0% |
| 2010 | XX | 1770 | 3.60 | Top 40% | Hispanic | 100.0% |
| 2010 | PA | 1760 | 3.20 | Top 25% | Hispanic | 100.0% |
| 2010 | PA | 1760 | 3.82 | Top 3% | Caucasian | 96.9% |
| 2010 | VA | 1760 | 3.30 | Unknown | East Asian | 77.5% |
| 2010 | XX | 1760 | 3.60 | Top 20% | East Asian | 82.2% |
| 2010 | NJ | 1760 | 3.67 | Top 30% | Caucasian | 70.3% |
| 2010 | GA | 1760 | 2.93 | Top 40% | Caucasian | 75.0% |
| 2010 | NY | 1750 | 3.68 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 92.7% |
| 2010 | NE | 1750 | 3.20 | Bottom 50% | Caucasian | 20.8% |
| 2010 | NY | 1750 | 3.73 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 95.1% |
| 2010 | NC | 1750 | 3.85 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 99.5% |
| 2010 | TX | 1750 | 3.50 | Top 40% | Caucasian | 39.7% |
| 2010 | XX | 1750 | 3.60 | Top 30% | East Asian | 65.6% |
| 2010 | NJ | 1750 | 3.62 | Unknown | Caucasian | 87.4% |
| 2010 | GA | 1750 | 3.80 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 94.1% |
| 2010 | ME | 1740 | 3.30 | Top 30% | Caucasian | 69.3% |
| 2010 | FL | 1740 | 3.60 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 94.7% |
| 2010 | NY | 1740 | 3.32 | Class Not Ranked | African-American | 100.0% |
| 2010 | CA | 1740 | 3.30 | Bottom 50% | African-American | 99.9% |
| 2010 | PA | 1740 | 2.34 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 84.5% |
| 2010 | PA | 1740 | 3.75 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 93.2% |
| 2010 | VA | 1740 | 3.92 | Top 20% | South Asian | 89.9% |
| 2010 | PA | 1740 | 3.00 | Top 40% | African-American | 99.9% |
| 2010 | NJ | 1740 | 3.40 | Class Not Ranked | Other | 79.9% |
| 2010 | TX | 1740 | 3.19 | Top 15% | Hispanic | 100.0% |
| 2010 | FL | 1740 | 3.20 | Unknown | Caucasian | 71.4% |
| 2010 | MI | 1730 | 3.60 | Unknown | Caucasian | 86.0% |
| 2010 | XX | 1730 | 4.00 | Top 10% | East Asian | 95.9% |
| 2010 | NJ | 1730 | 3.20 | Top 25% | Other | 94.5% |
| 2010 | XX | 1720 | 3.40 | Top 30% | Hispanic | 100.0% |
| 2010 | VA | 1720 | 3.38 | Top 10% | Middle-Eastern | 84.4% |
| 2010 | NY | 1720 | 3.30 | Top 35% | Caucasian | 35.4% |
| 2010 | CA | 1720 | 3.80 | Unknown | Hispanic | 100.0% |
| 2010 | MD | 1720 | 2.76 | Bottom 50% | African-American | 99.4% |
| 2010 | NY | 1720 | 3.30 | Top 15% | Hispanic | 100.0% |
| 2010 | PA | 1710 | 2.30 | Bottom 50% | Pacific Islander | 1.4% |
| 2010 | FL | 1710 | 3.75 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 94.8% |
| 2010 | NJ | 1710 | 3.50 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 81.6% |
| 2010 | NY | 1710 | 3.59 | Unknown | East Asian | 84.5% |
| 2010 | PA | 1710 | 3.00 | Top 35% | Caucasian | 20.7% |
| 2010 | PA | 1710 | 3.08 | Top 35% | Caucasian | 23.9% |
| 2010 | PA | 1710 | 3.50 | Unknown | Caucasian | 81.6% |
| 2010 | NY | 1710 | 3.00 | Bottom 50% | Hispanic | 99.6% |
| 2010 | VA | 1700 | 3.50 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 87.7% |
| 2010 | VA | 1700 | 3.30 | Top 35% | Caucasian | 33.6% |
| 2010 | XX | 1700 | 3.00 | Top 30% | None Indicated | 27.5% |
| 2010 | MD | 1700 | 2.95 | Top 40% | Caucasian | 70.8% |
| 2010 | PA | 1700 | 3.50 | Bottom 50% | Hispanic | 99.9% |
| 2010 | NY | 1700 | 3.10 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 62.5% |
| 2010 | NJ | 1700 | 3.30 | Top 40% | South Asian | 25.1% |
| 2010 | DE | 1690 | 3.70 | Top 10% | South Asian | 90.7% |
| 2010 | GA | 1690 | 3.32 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 63.6% |
| 2010 | NJ | 1690 | 3.60 | Top 5% | East Asian | 92.1% |
| 2010 | PA | 1680 | 4.00 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 92.9% |
| 2010 | MD | 1680 | 3.40 | Top 30% | South Asian | 94.7% |
| 2010 | NJ | 1680 | 3.00 | Bottom 50% | None Indicated | 6.2% |
| 2010 | PA | 1680 | 2.80 | Bottom 50% | Caucasian | 4.0% |
| 2010 | NJ | 1680 | 3.65 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 78.5% |
| 2010 | NJ | 1670 | 3.67 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 84.8% |
| 2010 | TX | 1670 | 3.80 | Top 3% | Hispanic | 100.0% |
| 2010 | NJ | 1670 | 3.34 | Top 30% | Caucasian | 42.5% |
| 2010 | PA | 1670 | 3.70 | Top 15% | Caucasian | 85.6% |
| 2010 | NJ | 1660 | 3.50 | Top 25% | East Asian | 60.7% |
| 2010 | MD | 1660 | 3.59 | Top 15% | Caucasian | 81.4% |
| 2010 | WA | 1660 | 3.92 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 93.5% |
| 2010 | MD | 1650 | 3.45 | Unknown | Caucasian | 76.4% |
| 2010 | NJ | 1650 | 3.40 | Top 30% | Caucasian | 43.7% |
| 2010 | (Private) | 1650 | 3.50 | Top 40% | Caucasian | 30.0% |
| 2010 | PA | 1650 | 3.68 | Top 25% | Caucasian | 97.4% |
| 2010 | NY | 1650 | 3.20 | Top 25% | None Indicated | 42.4% |
| 2010 | NY | 1650 | 3.00 | Top 25% | Caucasian | 31.5% |
| 2010 | NJ | 1650 | 3.30 | Top 35% | Caucasian | 28.9% |
| 2010 | MI | 1640 | 3.74 | Unknown | Caucasian | 94.4% |
| 2010 | OH | 1640 | 3.20 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 64.3% |
| 2010 | NY | 1640 | 3.10 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 56.2% |
| 2010 | PA | 1640 | 3.88 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 94.8% |
| 2010 | VA | 1640 | 3.70 | Unknown | Middle-Eastern | 84.0% |
| 2010 | NY | 1640 | 3.50 | Top 30% | African-American | 100.0% |
| 2010 | NJ | 1640 | 3.40 | Class Not Ranked | Hispanic | 100.0% |
| 2010 | MD | 1640 | 3.32 | Top 10% | South Asian | 76.5% |
| 2010 | PA | 1640 | 3.50 | Unknown | Caucasian | 76.6% |
| 2010 | MN | 1630 | 4.00 | Top 1% | Caucasian | 97.4% |
| 2010 | XX | 1630 | 3.60 | Top 40% | East Asian | 33.1% |
| 2010 | NJ | 1630 | 3.53 | Top 3% | South Asian | 90.0% |
| 2010 | XX | 1630 | 3.00 | Unknown | Caucasian | 49.1% |
| 2010 | NY | 1620 | 3.50 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 78.4% |
| 2010 | NY | 1620 | 3.70 | Top 1% | Hispanic | 100.0% |
| 2010 | NJ | 1620 | 3.40 | Unknown | Caucasian | 70.3% |
| 2010 | NJ | 1620 | 3.76 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 78.4% |
| 2010 | PA | 1620 | 3.70 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 87.9% |
| 2010 | FL | 1610 | 3.86 | Valedictorian | African-American | 100.0% |
| 2010 | DE | 1610 | 3.40 | Top 25% | Caucasian | 49.8% |
| 2010 | (Private) | 1610 | 3.50 | Top 25% | Caucasian | 55.7% |
| 2010 | NC | 1610 | 3.65 | Top 40% | Caucasian | 34.0% |
| 2010 | NJ | 1600 | 2.95 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 53.2% |
| 2010 | PA | 1600 | 3.35 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 74.4% |
| 2010 | XX | 1600 | 3.40 | Class Not Ranked | Hispanic | 100.0% |
| 2010 | PA | 1600 | 3.85 | Top 30% | Caucasian | 64.1% |
| 2010 | IL | 1590 | 3.45 | Top 20% | Other | 60.7% |
| 2010 | MD | 1590 | 3.60 | Top 30% | Caucasian | 94.0% |
| 2010 | VA | 1590 | 3.20 | Top 35% | African-American | 99.9% |
| 2010 | NJ | 1590 | 3.18 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 55.4% |
| 2010 | PA | 1590 | 3.10 | Class Not Ranked | Other | 50.7% |
| 2010 | CA | 1580 | 4.00 | Top 1% | South Asian | 98.4% |
| 2010 | OH | 1580 | 3.48 | Top 25% | Caucasian | 60.2% |
| 2010 | PA | 1580 | 3.40 | Bottom 50% | Caucasian | 9.9% |
| 2010 | PA | 1580 | 3.54 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 64.7% |
| 2010 | CO | 1560 | 3.60 | Top 25% | Caucasian | 72.2% |
| 2010 | IL | 1560 | 2.80 | Unknown | African-American | 100.0% |
| 2010 | PA | 1560 | 3.51 | Top 40% | South Asian | 26.5% |
| 2010 | FL | 1560 | 3.70 | Unknown | Caucasian | 78.7% |
| 2010 | NY | 1560 | 3.59 | Unknown | Hispanic | 100.0% |
| 2010 | PA | 1560 | 3.47 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 68.2% |
| 2010 | CA | 1560 | 3.33 | Top 30% | Caucasian | 30.8% |
| 2010 | PA | 1550 | 3.10 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 46.5% |
| 2010 | GA | 1550 | 3.40 | Top 35% | Caucasian | 25.0% |
| 2010 | NY | 1550 | 3.58 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 80.2% |
| 2010 | XX | 1550 | 2.70 | Class Not Ranked | East Asian | 25.4% |
| 2010 | PA | 1540 | 2.90 | Bottom 40% | Hispanic | 97.9% |
| 2010 | NJ | 1540 | 2.75 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 26.6% |
| 2010 | PA | 1540 | 3.66 | Top 25% | Caucasian | 95.6% |
| 2010 | MD | 1530 | 3.02 | Top 40% | African-American | 99.9% |
| 2010 | PA | 1530 | 2.80 | Top 35% | Caucasian | 6.9% |
| 2010 | TX | 1530 | 3.60 | Top 20% | African-American | 100.0% |
| 2010 | MA | 1520 | 3.40 | Top 40% | Hispanic | 99.9% |
| 2010 | MD | 1520 | 3.19 | Top 25% | South Asian | 29.1% |
| 2010 | MA | 1510 | 2.90 | Bottom 50% | African-American | 98.9% |
| 2010 | PA | 1510 | 3.33 | Top 35% | Caucasian | 19.1% |
| 2010 | PA | 1510 | 3.10 | Top 40% | Caucasian | 8.3% |
| 2010 | NJ | 1500 | 2.90 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 30.3% |
| 2010 | CA | 1500 | 3.00 | Unknown | Hispanic | 100.0% |
| 2010 | NY | 1490 | 3.20 | Unknown | Caucasian | 45.8% |
| 2010 | PA | 1490 | 3.20 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 45.8% |
| 2010 | NJ | 1490 | 3.00 | Top 30% | Caucasian | 13.2% |
| 2010 | FL | 1480 | 3.10 | Top 30% | Caucasian | 15.5% |
| 2010 | NC | 1480 | 4.00 | Top 1% | Caucasian | 94.4% |
| 2010 | VA | 1470 | 2.50 | Bottom 50% | Caucasian | 0.8% |
| 2010 | NJ | 1470 | 3.40 | Bottom 50% | Caucasian | 6.3% |
| 2010 | OH | 1450 | 2.83 | Bottom 50% | Caucasian | 40.5% |
| 2010 | NY | 1450 | 3.00 | Top 40% | Caucasian | 12.4% |
| 2010 | NJ | 1440 | 3.10 | Unknown | Caucasian | 34.9% |
| 2010 | NJ | 1440 | 3.80 | Top 10% | Hispanic | 100.0% |
| 2010 | FL | 1430 | 3.22 | Top 35% | Hispanic | 99.8% |
| 2010 | VA | 1430 | 2.78 | Unknown | Caucasian | 19.6% |
| 2010 | NJ | 1430 | 2.76 | Unknown | Caucasian | 18.8% |
| 2010 | MD | 1410 | 2.89 | Class Not Ranked | Hispanic | 99.9% |
| 2010 | PA | 1410 | 3.70 | Top 20% | South Asian | 55.9% |
| 2010 | PA | 1410 | 3.33 | Bottom 50% | Caucasian | 4.2% |
| 2010 | FL | 1390 | 3.00 | Class Not Ranked | Hispanic | 99.9% |
| 2010 | NJ | 1380 | 2.90 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 20.5% |
| 2010 | FL | 1350 | 3.00 | Top 40% | African-American | 99.3% |
| 2010 | NY | 1350 | 3.20 | Unknown | East Asian | 31.4% |
| 2010 | PA | 1340 | 3.20 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 22.6% |
| 2010 | MA | 1330 | 3.00 | Bottom 40% | Native American | 95.9% |
| 2010 | FL | 1300 | 3.10 | Bottom 50% | Caucasian | 21.2% |
| 2010 | VA | 1280 | 3.30 | Unknown | African-American | 99.9% |
| 2010 | NJ | 1260 | 3.10 | Unknown | Caucasian | 19.7% |
| 2010 | RI | 1250 | 2.90 | Bottom 50% | Caucasian | 0.8% |
| 2010 | NY | 1240 | 2.05 | Unknown | African-American | 98.6% |
| 2010 | MD | 1230 | 2.19 | Unknown | African-American | 99.0% |
| 2010 | NJ | 1220 | 3.13 | Class Not Ranked | Hispanic | 100.0% |
| 2010 | WV | 1200 | 4.00 | Unknown | Caucasian | 95.5% |
| 2010 | PA | 1060 | 3.50 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 63.4% |
| 2010 | NY | 1030 | 3.40 | Top 20% | Hispanic | 99.8% |
| 2010 | PA | 1030 | 3.40 | Top 15% | Caucasian | 63.1% |
| 2010 | CA | 36 | 2.30 | Unknown | African-American | 100.0% |
| 2010 | VA | 35 | 3.92 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 99.6% |
| 2010 | XX | 34 | 4.00 | Top 3% | East Asian | 99.8% |
| 2010 | MI | 34 | 3.00 | Bottom 40% | Caucasian | 26.7% |
| 2010 | OR | 34 | 4.00 | Valedictorian | African-American | 100.0% |
| 2010 | MN | 33 | 3.81 | Top 15% | Caucasian | 98.7% |
| 2010 | (Private) | 33 | 3.75 | Class Not Ranked | South Asian | 98.5% |
| 2010 | (Private) | 32 | 3.20 | Class Not Ranked | None Indicated | 93.1% |
| 2010 | NJ | 32 | 3.71 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 98.5% |
| 2010 | FL | 32 | 3.72 | Salutatorian | Caucasian | 99.4% |
| 2010 | XX | 32 | 3.44 | Class Not Ranked | South Asian | 96.0% |
| 2010 | IL | 32 | 2.89 | Top 20% | Other | 81.2% |
| 2010 | XX | 31 | 3.39 | Top 25% | South Asian | 87.7% |
| 2010 | NH | 31 | 3.59 | Top 15% | East Asian | 96.3% |
| 2010 | MI | 31 | 3.75 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 97.4% |
| 2010 | OH | 31 | 3.50 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 93.3% |
| 2010 | IL | 31 | 3.20 | Unknown | Caucasian | 91.3% |
| 2010 | PA | 30 | 3.76 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 96.8% |
| 2010 | PA | 30 | 3.60 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 95.4% |
| 2010 | PA | 30 | 3.89 | Top 4% | Caucasian | 99.0% |
| 2010 | MN | 30 | 3.66 | Unknown | Caucasian | 95.9% |
| 2010 | IL | 30 | 3.50 | Top 30% | Caucasian | 82.4% |
| 2010 | IL | 30 | 3.30 | Top 30% | Caucasian | 98.0% |
| 2010 | OH | 30 | 3.80 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 98.7% |
| 2010 | MO | 30 | 3.83 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 98.8% |
| 2010 | IL | 30 | 3.50 | Unknown | East Asian | 94.2% |
| 2010 | PA | 29 | 3.74 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 95.7% |
| 2010 | IL | 29 | 3.70 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 95.2% |
| 2010 | NJ | 29 | 3.30 | Bottom 50% | Caucasian | 30.1% |
| 2010 | NJ | 29 | 3.95 | Unknown | Caucasian | 97.3% |
| 2010 | NY | 28 | 2.95 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 72.7% |
| 2010 | VA | 28 | 3.30 | Top 10% | South Asian | 90.1% |
| 2010 | OH | 28 | 3.10 | Top 15% | Caucasian | 79.1% |
| 2010 | VA | 28 | 3.34 | Unknown | Caucasian | 86.9% |
| 2010 | NJ | 28 | 3.00 | Unknown | East Asian | 74.9% |
| 2010 | TX | 28 | 3.50 | Top 40% | Native American | 100.0% |
| 2010 | IL | 28 | 3.69 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 93.8% |
| 2010 | KY | 28 | 3.50 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 86.4% |
| 2010 | OH | 28 | 4.00 | Top 1% | Caucasian | 99.9% |
| 2010 | MN | 28 | 3.39 | Top 40% | Caucasian | 48.4% |
| 2010 | MA | 27 | 3.45 | Top 25% | Caucasian | 74.3% |
| 2010 | NY | 27 | 3.50 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 88.2% |
| 2010 | VA | 27 | 3.33 | Unknown | Caucasian | 83.3% |
| 2010 | (Private) | 27 | 3.60 | Class Not Ranked | African-American | 100.0% |
| 2010 | MI | 26 | 3.65 | Top 10% | None Indicated | 92.9% |
| 2010 | TX | 26 | 3.50 | Bottom 50% | Hispanic | 99.9% |
| 2010 | CA | 26 | 3.82 | Top 4% | Caucasian | 97.0% |
| 2010 | PA | 26 | 3.40 | Top 20% | South Asian | 76.2% |
| 2010 | WI | 26 | 3.78 | Top 15% | Caucasian | 92.2% |
| 2010 | WI | 26 | 3.80 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 89.1% |
| 2010 | NY | 25 | 2.30 | Bottom 10% | Caucasian | 0.1% |
| 2010 | TX | 25 | 3.24 | Top 25% | Middle-Eastern | 52.8% |
| 2010 | OH | 25 | 3.20 | Unknown | Caucasian | 70.0% |
| 2010 | IL | 25 | 3.55 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 84.1% |
| 2010 | NJ | 25 | 3.40 | Unknown | South Asian | 78.9% |
| 2010 | KS | 24 | 2.80 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 41.3% |
| 2010 | WI | 24 | 4.00 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 94.7% |
| 2010 | IL | 24 | 3.50 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 78.4% |
| 2010 | WI | 24 | 3.84 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 84.2% |
| 2010 | MN | 23 | 2.81 | Unknown | South Asian | 35.7% |
| 2010 | NJ | 23 | 3.75 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 99.2% |
| 2010 | OH | 18 | 1.60 | Unknown | African-American | 97.1% |
| 2010 | TX | 18 | 3.30 | Top 30% | Hispanic | 99.8% |
| 2009 | NY | 2400 | 4.00 | Unknown | South Asian | 99.7% |
| 2009 | CA | 2400 | 4.00 | Valedictorian | Native American | 100.0% |
| 2009 | NY | 2400 | 3.90 | Top 1% | South Asian | 99.9% |
| 2009 | CA | 2400 | 4.00 | Top 5% | East Asian | 99.8% |
| 2009 | WI | 2370 | 4.00 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 99.8% |
| 2009 | NC | 2340 | 2.10 | Bottom 40% | South Asian | 5.8% |
| 2009 | NJ | 2340 | 3.82 | Top 5% | South Asian | 99.7% |
| 2009 | MD | 2330 | 4.00 | Top 5% | South Asian | 99.8% |
| 2009 | PA | 2330 | 4.00 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 99.8% |
| 2009 | NY | 2310 | 4.00 | Unknown | Caucasian | 99.5% |
| 2009 | XX | 2300 | 3.89 | Top 5% | South Asian | 99.7% |
| 2009 | VA | 2290 | 3.60 | Top 10% | South Asian | 99.1% |
| 2009 | PA | 2290 | 3.80 | Top 1% | East Asian | 99.7% |
| 2009 | XX | 2290 | 4.00 | Salutatorian | East Asian | 99.8% |
| 2009 | NJ | 2270 | 3.87 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 99.6% |
| 2009 | TX | 2270 | 3.95 | Class Not Ranked | South Asian | 99.3% |
| 2009 | VA | 2260 | 3.50 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 97.0% |
| 2009 | OH | 2250 | 4.00 | Salutatorian | East Asian | 99.9% |
| 2009 | CA | 2250 | 3.52 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 98.7% |
| 2009 | PA | 2250 | 3.87 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 99.6% |
| 2009 | PA | 2250 | 3.57 | Top 5% | South Asian | 99.2% |
| 2009 | DE | 2230 | 3.80 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 99.2% |
| 2009 | PA | 2220 | 3.09 | Bottom 50% | Caucasian | 45.9% |
| 2009 | PA | 2220 | 3.77 | Top 10% | East Asian | 99.1% |
| 2009 | MA | 2210 | 3.68 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 98.9% |
| 2009 | (Private) | 2200 | 3.30 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 95.8% |
| 2009 | NJ | 2200 | 3.90 | Class Not Ranked | East Asian | 99.0% |
| 2009 | XX | 2200 | 3.50 | Unknown | Caucasian | 97.4% |
| 2009 | VA | 2190 | 4.00 | Top 1% | South Asian | 99.7% |
| 2009 | TN | 2180 | 3.42 | Top 30% | Hispanic | 100.0% |
| 2009 | NY | 2180 | 3.40 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 96.4% |
| 2009 | PA | 2180 | 3.30 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 93.4% |
| 2009 | PA | 2170 | 3.50 | Class Not Ranked | East Asian | 97.0% |
| 2009 | CA | 2170 | 3.83 | Top 10% | East Asian | 99.1% |
| 2009 | MD | 2170 | 4.00 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 100.0% |
| 2009 | PA | 2160 | 3.60 | Top 20% | None Indicated | 96.3% |
| 2009 | NJ | 2150 | 3.80 | Top 10% | East Asian | 98.9% |
| 2009 | PA | 2150 | 3.67 | Top 5% | East Asian | 99.0% |
| 2009 | NJ | 2140 | 3.80 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 98.9% |
| 2009 | PA | 2140 | 3.80 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 98.3% |
| 2009 | CA | 2140 | 3.70 | Unknown | East Asian | 97.8% |
| 2009 | PA | 2130 | 3.85 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 99.4% |
| 2009 | VA | 2130 | 3.90 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 99.4% |
| 2009 | NJ | 2130 | 3.90 | Class Not Ranked | East Asian | 98.6% |
| 2009 | XX | 2130 | 3.80 | Top 5% | South Asian | 99.2% |
| 2009 | PA | 2130 | 3.45 | Class Not Ranked | Hispanic | 100.0% |
| 2009 | NJ | 2120 | 3.50 | Top 20% | East Asian | 94.6% |
| 2009 | MD | 2120 | 3.96 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 99.2% |
| 2009 | XX | 2120 | 3.25 | Top 20% | South Asian | 90.6% |
| 2009 | TX | 2120 | 2.72 | Unknown | South Asian | 80.9% |
| 2009 | FL | 2110 | 3.90 | Top 1% | Caucasian | 99.5% |
| 2009 | NY | 2110 | 3.50 | Unknown | East Asian | 96.2% |
| 2009 | NY | 2100 | 3.40 | Bottom 50% | East Asian | 54.3% |
| 2009 | TX | 2100 | 3.30 | Top 10% | East Asian | 95.8% |
| 2009 | PA | 2100 | 4.00 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 98.7% |
| 2009 | (Private) | 2100 | 4.00 | Top 5% | Hispanic | 100.0% |
| 2009 | (Private) | 2100 | 3.96 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 99.9% |
| 2009 | TX | 2100 | 3.90 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 97.6% |
| 2009 | NJ | 2100 | 3.60 | Unknown | Other | 96.8% |
| 2009 | MD | 2100 | 3.60 | Top 10% | None Indicated | 97.9% |
| 2009 | VA | 2100 | 3.60 | Top 10% | African-American | 100.0% |
| 2009 | TX | 2100 | 2.00 | Top 10% | East Asian | 51.9% |
| 2009 | NY | 2100 | 3.80 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 98.7% |
| 2009 | NJ | 2090 | 3.50 | Top 30% | Caucasian | 91.1% |
| 2009 | MO | 2090 | 3.80 | Top 10% | South Asian | 98.6% |
| 2009 | PA | 2080 | 3.28 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 92.9% |
| 2009 | PA | 2080 | 4.00 | Top 1% | Caucasian | 99.6% |
| 2009 | CA | 2070 | 3.80 | Top 10% | None Indicated | 98.5% |
| 2009 | PA | 2070 | 3.91 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 99.2% |
| 2009 | NC | 2070 | 3.20 | Class Not Ranked | African-American | 100.0% |
| 2009 | NJ | 2070 | 3.48 | Unknown | Other | 95.3% |
| 2009 | MA | 2070 | 3.51 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 97.0% |
| 2009 | MD | 2070 | 3.80 | Unknown | East Asian | 97.7% |
| 2009 | NY | 2070 | 3.50 | Top 30% | East Asian | 85.9% |
| 2009 | CA | 2060 | 2.30 | Bottom 0% | East Asian | 0.1% |
| 2009 | PA | 2060 | 3.90 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 98.7% |
| 2009 | FL | 2050 | 2.88 | Top 30% | None Indicated | 56.4% |
| 2009 | MA | 2050 | 3.80 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 96.3% |
| 2009 | NJ | 2050 | 3.60 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 96.1% |
| 2009 | FL | 2050 | 3.25 | Top 30% | Caucasian | 75.5% |
| 2009 | (Private) | 2040 | 3.70 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 95.7% |
| 2009 | PA | 2040 | 3.70 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 96.7% |
| 2009 | NJ | 2040 | 3.59 | Top 10% | East Asian | 97.2% |
| 2009 | PA | 2040 | 3.78 | Unknown | Caucasian | 97.3% |
| 2009 | PA | 2040 | 3.60 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 97.3% |
| 2009 | (Private) | 2030 | 3.60 | Top 10% | South Asian | 98.1% |
| 2009 | NJ | 2030 | 3.79 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 98.2% |
| 2009 | XX | 2030 | 3.43 | Top 10% | East Asian | 95.8% |
| 2009 | PA | 2030 | 3.40 | Top 20% | South Asian | 90.3% |
| 2009 | PA | 2030 | 3.50 | Top 30% | Caucasian | 83.7% |
| 2009 | VA | 2020 | 2.99 | Unknown | East Asian | 83.6% |
| 2009 | FL | 2020 | 3.64 | Top 30% | African-American | 100.0% |
| 2009 | MA | 2020 | 3.60 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 97.0% |
| 2009 | NY | 2010 | 3.52 | Top 20% | Middle-Eastern | 91.8% |
| 2009 | NY | 2010 | 3.18 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 88.5% |
| 2009 | VA | 2010 | 3.50 | Unknown | East Asian | 94.2% |
| 2009 | CT | 2000 | 3.00 | Class Not Ranked | East Asian | 82.9% |
| 2009 | CA | 2000 | 2.93 | Bottom 50% | Middle-Eastern | 18.4% |
| 2009 | MD | 2000 | 3.40 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 89.1% |
| 2009 | PA | 1990 | 3.45 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 94.1% |
| 2009 | CA | 1990 | 3.54 | Unknown | Caucasian | 96.8% |
| 2009 | PA | 1990 | 3.97 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 99.3% |
| 2009 | PA | 1990 | 3.50 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 93.3% |
| 2009 | MA | 1990 | 3.47 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 90.1% |
| 2009 | XX | 1990 | 3.71 | Unknown | East Asian | 96.0% |
| 2009 | NJ | 1990 | 3.67 | Top 20% | East Asian | 93.6% |
| 2009 | MA | 1990 | 3.53 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 91.3% |
| 2009 | PA | 1980 | 3.71 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 97.2% |
| 2009 | NY | 1980 | 3.70 | Unknown | Hispanic | 100.0% |
| 2009 | CT | 1980 | 3.40 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 88.2% |
| 2009 | CT | 1980 | 3.77 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 96.4% |
| 2009 | NJ | 1970 | 3.00 | Class Not Ranked | Other | 96.5% |
| 2009 | NY | 1970 | 3.10 | Class Not Ranked | Middle-Eastern | 84.3% |
| 2009 | PA | 1970 | 3.72 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 95.8% |
| 2009 | MA | 1960 | 3.00 | Bottom 50% | Caucasian | 18.1% |
| 2009 | PA | 1950 | 2.50 | Bottom 50% | Hispanic | 99.6% |
| 2009 | DE | 1950 | 3.50 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 89.2% |
| 2009 | VA | 1950 | 3.35 | Class Not Ranked | East Asian | 89.8% |
| 2009 | WV | 1950 | 3.80 | Unknown | Middle-Eastern | 96.2% |
| 2009 | PA | 1950 | 3.40 | Unknown | Caucasian | 90.8% |
| 2009 | PA | 1940 | 4.00 | Top 1% | Caucasian | 99.6% |
| 2009 | MD | 1940 | 3.48 | Unknown | South Asian | 92.0% |
| 2009 | NY | 1930 | 3.30 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 91.0% |
| 2009 | PA | 1930 | 3.90 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 97.8% |
| 2009 | VA | 1930 | 3.00 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 70.0% |
| 2009 | MD | 1930 | 3.30 | Top 40% | East Asian | 47.4% |
| 2009 | PA | 1930 | 3.20 | Top 20% | South Asian | 78.9% |
| 2009 | NY | 1930 | 3.60 | Top 30% | Caucasian | 80.6% |
| 2009 | PA | 1930 | 3.20 | Top 40% | Caucasian | 41.6% |
| 2009 | WA | 1930 | 4.00 | Top 1% | Caucasian | 99.2% |
| 2009 | PA | 1920 | 3.50 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 96.2% |
| 2009 | NJ | 1910 | 3.70 | Top 40% | East Asian | 71.6% |
| 2009 | NJ | 1910 | 3.87 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 96.2% |
| 2009 | MA | 1910 | 3.40 | Top 30% | Caucasian | 70.7% |
| 2009 | MA | 1910 | 3.40 | Class Not Ranked | Hispanic | 100.0% |
| 2009 | PA | 1900 | 2.88 | Top 40% | African-American | 99.9% |
| 2009 | CT | 1900 | 3.25 | Unknown | Caucasian | 84.8% |
| 2009 | (Private) | 1900 | 3.70 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 99.8% |
| 2009 | NJ | 1900 | 2.40 | Class Not Ranked | Native American | 100.0% |
| 2009 | PA | 1890 | 3.55 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 87.8% |
| 2009 | CA | 1880 | 2.98 | Top 10% | East Asian | 84.9% |
| 2009 | MD | 1880 | 3.00 | Top 30% | Caucasian | 45.3% |
| 2009 | WA | 1880 | 3.85 | Top 20% | African-American | 100.0% |
| 2009 | NY | 1880 | 3.33 | Unknown | Caucasian | 86.2% |
| 2009 | PA | 1880 | 3.75 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 96.2% |
| 2009 | FL | 1880 | 3.64 | Top 20% | Hispanic | 100.0% |
| 2009 | MD | 1880 | 3.48 | Unknown | Caucasian | 89.9% |
| 2009 | XX | 1880 | 3.37 | Top 20% | African-American | 100.0% |
| 2009 | CT | 1880 | 3.00 | Top 10% | East Asian | 81.3% |
| 2009 | MO | 1880 | 3.00 | Bottom 50% | East Asian | 13.6% |
| 2009 | NJ | 1880 | 3.50 | Top 30% | East Asian | 72.8% |
| 2009 | (Private) | 1870 | 4.00 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 98.5% |
| 2009 | VA | 1870 | 3.42 | Top 30% | Caucasian | 67.8% |
| 2009 | MD | 1870 | 3.57 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 94.0% |
| 2009 | PA | 1870 | 3.00 | Top 30% | African-American | 100.0% |
| 2009 | NY | 1870 | 3.00 | Class Not Ranked | Middle-Eastern | 73.2% |
| 2009 | CA | 1870 | 3.70 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 90.3% |
| 2009 | NJ | 1860 | 3.60 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 93.1% |
| 2009 | WA | 1860 | 3.60 | Top 30% | Caucasian | 75.5% |
| 2009 | PA | 1860 | 3.80 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 97.5% |
| 2009 | DE | 1860 | 3.90 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 98.0% |
| 2009 | NJ | 1860 | 3.40 | Class Not Ranked | South Asian | 87.0% |
| 2009 | NY | 1860 | 3.30 | Top 40% | South Asian | 40.0% |
| 2009 | CA | 1860 | 3.60 | Unknown | East Asian | 91.5% |
| 2009 | MA | 1850 | 3.35 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 85.3% |
| 2009 | NY | 1850 | 3.47 | Class Not Ranked | East Asian | 88.4% |
| 2009 | MD | 1850 | 3.76 | Unknown | Caucasian | 93.7% |
| 2009 | VA | 1840 | 3.10 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 79.1% |
| 2009 | XX | 1840 | 3.58 | Top 5% | South Asian | 95.5% |
| 2009 | PA | 1830 | 3.60 | Top 10% | African-American | 100.0% |
| 2009 | CA | 1830 | 3.24 | Top 40% | East Asian | 33.7% |
| 2009 | MD | 1830 | 3.54 | Top 20% | Hispanic | 100.0% |
| 2009 | NJ | 1830 | 3.78 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 95.6% |
| 2009 | PA | 1830 | 3.60 | Top 30% | Caucasian | 73.1% |
| 2009 | PA | 1830 | 3.70 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 88.7% |
| 2009 | NY | 1820 | 3.00 | Unknown | South Asian | 68.9% |
| 2009 | XX | 1820 | 3.20 | Class Not Ranked | Other | 78.0% |
| 2009 | CT | 1820 | 3.30 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 81.7% |
| 2009 | CA | 1810 | 3.76 | Top 20% | South Asian | 90.0% |
| 2009 | MD | 1810 | 3.40 | Top 30% | African-American | 100.0% |
| 2009 | MD | 1810 | 3.14 | Top 30% | African-American | 100.0% |
| 2009 | NJ | 1810 | 2.69 | Bottom 30% | South Asian | 1.1% |
| 2009 | CA | 1810 | 3.20 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 77.1% |
| 2009 | PA | 1810 | 3.60 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 92.9% |
| 2009 | TX | 1800 | 3.89 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 99.0% |
| 2009 | NJ | 1800 | 3.60 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 89.2% |
| 2009 | VA | 1800 | 3.30 | Unknown | East Asian | 80.3% |
| 2009 | CT | 1800 | 3.62 | Top 40% | East Asian | 52.1% |
| 2009 | NJ | 1800 | 3.37 | Unknown | Hispanic | 100.0% |
| 2009 | XX | 1800 | 3.80 | Top 10% | East Asian | 95.2% |
| 2009 | PA | 1800 | 3.80 | Unknown | Caucasian | 93.0% |
| 2009 | FL | 1800 | 3.20 | Top 40% | Caucasian | 28.9% |
| 2009 | PA | 1800 | 3.50 | Top 10% | None Indicated | 90.8% |
| 2009 | NJ | 1800 | 3.75 | Top 20% | East Asian | 88.6% |
| 2009 | PA | 1800 | 3.50 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 81.2% |
| 2009 | NJ | 1790 | 3.00 | Top 30% | Caucasian | 39.9% |
| 2009 | PA | 1790 | 3.88 | Top 5% | Hispanic | 100.0% |
| 2009 | NY | 1790 | 3.50 | Class Not Ranked | East Asian | 86.3% |
| 2009 | MA | 1780 | 3.30 | Top 30% | Caucasian | 51.8% |
| 2009 | MA | 1780 | 3.50 | Top 40% | Caucasian | 42.9% |
| 2009 | MA | 1780 | 3.50 | Top 40% | Caucasian | 42.9% |
| 2009 | PA | 1780 | 3.78 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 88.4% |
| 2009 | IA | 1780 | 3.10 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 70.0% |
| 2009 | PA | 1780 | 3.10 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 70.0% |
| 2009 | VA | 1780 | 3.75 | Top 20% | Middle-Eastern | 87.6% |
| 2009 | PA | 1770 | 4.00 | Top 5% | Middle-Eastern | 97.7% |
| 2009 | CA | 1770 | 3.10 | Class Not Ranked | South Asian | 69.2% |
| 2009 | CT | 1770 | 3.60 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 82.7% |
| 2009 | NY | 1770 | 3.60 | Unknown | Caucasian | 87.9% |
| 2009 | NJ | 1770 | 3.76 | Class Not Ranked | Other | 91.3% |
| 2009 | NJ | 1770 | 3.20 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 73.9% |
| 2009 | PA | 1760 | 3.40 | Top 30% | Caucasian | 62.9% |
| 2009 | PA | 1760 | 3.20 | Top 30% | Caucasian | 44.0% |
| 2009 | NJ | 1760 | 3.69 | Top 10% | South Asian | 92.9% |
| 2009 | GA | 1760 | 2.90 | Bottom 40% | African-American | 99.2% |
| 2009 | PA | 1760 | 3.30 | Top 30% | Caucasian | 49.9% |
| 2009 | NY | 1750 | 3.25 | Class Not Ranked | Hispanic | 100.0% |
| 2009 | MD | 1750 | 3.54 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 89.7% |
| 2009 | PA | 1750 | 3.10 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 67.2% |
| 2009 | NY | 1750 | 3.45 | Unknown | Caucasian | 82.3% |
| 2009 | MD | 1740 | 3.40 | Class Not Ranked | East Asian | 79.9% |
| 2009 | PA | 1740 | 3.40 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 85.8% |
| 2009 | RI | 1740 | 3.40 | Top 30% | Caucasian | 53.4% |
| 2009 | PA | 1740 | 3.42 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 73.4% |
| 2009 | CA | 1740 | 2.96 | Class Not Ranked | East Asian | 58.7% |
| 2009 | GA | 1730 | 3.20 | Top 20% | None Indicated | |