Penn State University Applications and Decisions
Below is a list of applicants who have demonstrated interest in Penn State University. Our best formula
for this college is based on
304 members who were accepted or rejected. The formula
has a college admissions prediction accuracy of
90%?.
Because not all members have filled out the most recent version of our survey, some predictions are made based on
less-accurate models. Those are noted with an asterisk (*) next to their prediction.
This is a very popular school, so we're only showing you profiles that have received an admissions decision. If you
want to see all applicants to this school,
click here (caution: the page will take awhile to load).
|
| 2009 | PA | 1960 | 3.67 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 95.1% |
| 2009 | (Private) | 1850 | 4.00 | Top 5% | Other | 99.2% |
| 2009 | PA | 1850 | 3.60 | Top 15% | Caucasian | 91.2% |
| 2009 | PA | 1790 | 3.65 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 87.5% |
| 2009 | PA | 1770 | 3.84 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 99.3% |
| 2009 | PA | 1740 | 3.80 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 99.4% |
| 2009 | PA | 1730 | 3.50 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 76.2% |
| 2009 | NJ | 1680 | 3.68 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 98.5% |
| 2009 | VA | 1640 | 3.80 | Class Not Ranked | African-American | 100.0% |
| 2009 | PA | 1590 | 2.99 | Bottom 50% | Caucasian | 4.2% |
| 2009 | CA | 30 | 3.95 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 97.9% |
| 2009 | NJ | 28 | 3.55 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 91.6% |
| 2008 | FL | 1780 | 3.50 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 79.8% |
| 2008 | PA | 1760 | 3.39 | Top 20% | South Asian | 73.8% |
| 2008 | (Private) | 1730 | 3.76 | Top 20% | None Indicated | 88.2% |
| 2008 | PA | 1580 | 3.80 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 77.1% |
| 2006 | TX | 2030 | 3.80 | Top 10% | Other | 98.2% |
|
| 2010 | PA | 2230 | 3.60 | Top 10% | South Asian | 98.8% |
| 2010 | PA | 2220 | 4.00 | Valedictorian | Caucasian | 99.8% |
| 2010 | PA | 2170 | 3.61 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 97.7% |
| 2010 | PA | 2170 | 3.76 | Top 10% | Hispanic | 100.0% |
| 2010 | PA | 2160 | 3.88 | Top 3% | Caucasian | 100.0% |
| 2010 | PA | 2120 | 3.96 | Top 3% | Caucasian | 99.5% |
| 2010 | NH | 2110 | 3.62 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 98.0% |
| 2010 | PA | 2100 | 3.00 | Top 15% | South Asian | 88.1% |
| 2010 | NJ | 2090 | 3.70 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 99.4% |
| 2010 | PA | 2030 | 3.80 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 98.2% |
| 2010 | PA | 2010 | 3.70 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 97.5% |
| 2010 | CA | 2000 | 3.86 | Top 10% | None Indicated | 99.0% |
| 2010 | PA | 2000 | 3.84 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 98.1% |
| 2010 | XX | 2000 | 3.70 | Top 20% | South Asian | 94.3% |
| 2010 | PA | 1960 | 3.89 | Top 15% | Caucasian | 97.0% |
| 2010 | PA | 1940 | 3.40 | Top 25% | Caucasian | 80.6% |
| 2010 | PA | 1920 | 3.94 | Top 3% | Caucasian | 99.0% |
| 2010 | PA | 1920 | 3.70 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 97.6% |
| 2010 | PA | 1860 | 3.40 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 81.6% |
| 2010 | PA | 1790 | 3.75 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 94.5% |
| 2010 | PA | 1730 | 3.70 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 93.7% |
| 2010 | NJ | 1730 | 3.40 | Top 30% | Caucasian | 52.5% |
| 2010 | IL | 1560 | 3.75 | Top 15% | Caucasian | 94.6% |
| 2010 | PA | 1450 | 4.00 | Top 1% | Caucasian | 99.7% |
| 2009 | PA | 2360 | 3.35 | Unknown | Caucasian | 98.1% |
| 2009 | (Private) | 2350 | 3.80 | Class Not Ranked | East Asian | 99.3% |
| 2009 | PA | 2350 | 3.80 | Top 10% | Other | 99.5% |
| 2009 | MD | 2330 | 4.00 | Top 5% | South Asian | 99.8% |
| 2009 | PA | 2330 | 4.00 | Valedictorian | South Asian | 99.9% |
| 2009 | PA | 2300 | 4.00 | Top 1% | Caucasian | 99.8% |
| 2009 | MI | 2290 | 3.97 | Top 10% | South Asian | 99.6% |
| 2009 | WA | 2270 | 3.89 | Top 10% | East Asian | 99.5% |
| 2009 | NY | 2250 | 3.95 | Top 5% | African-American | 100.0% |
| 2009 | PA | 2240 | 3.89 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 100.0% |
| 2009 | MA | 2240 | 3.20 | Class Not Ranked | East Asian | 95.6% |
| 2009 | NJ | 2230 | 3.67 | Top 10% | South Asian | 99.1% |
| 2009 | PA | 2230 | 3.75 | Top 10% | South Asian | 99.1% |
| 2009 | NJ | 2230 | 3.77 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 99.5% |
| 2009 | PA | 2230 | 3.45 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 96.1% |
| 2009 | PA | 2230 | 4.00 | Valedictorian | Caucasian | 100.0% |
| 2009 | NJ | 2220 | 3.84 | Class Not Ranked | South Asian | 98.9% |
| 2009 | PA | 2220 | 3.72 | Top 10% | South Asian | 99.0% |
| 2009 | PA | 2220 | 4.00 | Top 1% | Caucasian | 99.8% |
| 2009 | MD | 2200 | 3.57 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 99.9% |
| 2009 | PA | 2200 | 3.85 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 99.5% |
| 2009 | PA | 2190 | 3.80 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 99.4% |
| 2009 | MD | 2170 | 4.00 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 99.6% |
| 2009 | TX | 2170 | 3.78 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 99.0% |
| 2009 | PA | 2170 | 3.80 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 99.0% |
| 2009 | PA | 2160 | 3.80 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 99.9% |
| 2009 | NY | 2150 | 3.48 | Class Not Ranked | Middle-Eastern | 96.6% |
| 2009 | PA | 2150 | 3.88 | Top 1% | South Asian | 99.6% |
| 2009 | FL | 2140 | 3.68 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 98.5% |
| 2009 | PA | 2140 | 3.90 | Salutatorian | Caucasian | 99.6% |
| 2009 | NJ | 2130 | 3.46 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 96.1% |
| 2009 | PA | 2130 | 3.40 | Top 20% | African-American | 100.0% |
| 2009 | (Private) | 2100 | 4.00 | Top 1% | Caucasian | 100.0% |
| 2009 | PA | 2100 | 3.40 | Top 30% | African-American | 100.0% |
| 2009 | NJ | 2100 | 3.70 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 96.2% |
| 2009 | NJ | 2100 | 3.61 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 95.4% |
| 2009 | PA | 2080 | 3.67 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 99.8% |
| 2009 | PA | 2080 | 3.85 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 99.1% |
| 2009 | PA | 2080 | 3.93 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 99.3% |
| 2009 | NJ | 2080 | 3.37 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 91.4% |
| 2009 | PA | 2070 | 3.85 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 98.9% |
| 2009 | (Private) | 2070 | 4.00 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 99.4% |
| 2009 | PA | 2070 | 3.95 | Top 1% | Caucasian | 100.0% |
| 2009 | CA | 2070 | 3.35 | Top 10% | East Asian | 95.7% |
| 2009 | FL | 2070 | 3.86 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 98.7% |
| 2009 | PA | 2070 | 3.36 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 90.9% |
| 2009 | PA | 2070 | 4.00 | Valedictorian | Caucasian | 99.6% |
| 2009 | PA | 2070 | 3.79 | Top 5% | East Asian | 99.0% |
| 2009 | PA | 2070 | 2.98 | Unknown | None Indicated | 86.2% |
| 2009 | PA | 2060 | 3.74 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 97.3% |
| 2009 | MA | 2060 | 3.40 | Top 20% | East Asian | 91.4% |
| 2009 | PA | 2050 | 4.00 | Salutatorian | Other | 99.8% |
| 2009 | NJ | 2050 | 3.93 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 99.2% |
| 2009 | CT | 2050 | 3.90 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 98.7% |
| 2009 | PA | 2050 | 3.20 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 93.5% |
| 2009 | PA | 2050 | 3.95 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 99.2% |
| 2009 | NJ | 2050 | 3.60 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 96.1% |
| 2009 | NJ | 2050 | 3.08 | Class Not Ranked | African-American | 100.0% |
| 2009 | PA | 2040 | 3.60 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 94.6% |
| 2009 | (Private) | 2040 | 3.72 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 97.9% |
| 2009 | NJ | 2040 | 3.93 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 99.1% |
| 2009 | PA | 2040 | 4.00 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 99.3% |
| 2009 | PA | 2040 | 3.68 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 97.7% |
| 2009 | TX | 2030 | 3.50 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 92.2% |
| 2009 | CT | 2030 | 3.80 | Top 20% | None Indicated | 96.0% |
| 2009 | CA | 2020 | 3.38 | Unknown | East Asian | 92.7% |
| 2009 | NJ | 2020 | 3.62 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 95.7% |
| 2009 | NY | 2020 | 3.00 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 84.0% |
| 2009 | PA | 2010 | 4.00 | Top 1% | South Asian | 99.4% |
| 2009 | XX | 2000 | 4.00 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 99.1% |
| 2009 | VA | 2000 | 3.00 | Unknown | East Asian | 82.9% |
| 2009 | NJ | 2000 | 3.49 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 91.0% |
| 2009 | (Private) | 1980 | 3.50 | Top 40% | Caucasian | 96.7% |
| 2009 | NJ | 1980 | 4.00 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 99.1% |
| 2009 | VA | 1980 | 3.84 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 98.0% |
| 2009 | XX | 1980 | 3.80 | Top 10% | South Asian | 97.8% |
| 2009 | PA | 1980 | 3.65 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 99.7% |
| 2009 | XX | 1970 | 3.60 | Top 1% | East Asian | 98.2% |
| 2009 | MD | 1960 | 3.55 | Class Not Ranked | East Asian | 93.6% |
| 2009 | OH | 1950 | 3.20 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 89.9% |
| 2009 | NJ | 1950 | 3.84 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 97.7% |
| 2009 | NJ | 1940 | 3.40 | Unknown | Caucasian | 90.8% |
| 2009 | NY | 1940 | 3.50 | Top 40% | Caucasian | 60.2% |
| 2009 | NJ | 1940 | 3.39 | Unknown | Other | 90.3% |
| 2009 | NY | 1930 | 3.90 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 97.8% |
| 2009 | NY | 1930 | 3.40 | Top 30% | East Asian | 72.3% |
| 2009 | NJ | 1930 | 3.68 | Class Not Ranked | South Asian | 94.6% |
| 2009 | MD | 1930 | 3.50 | Top 25% | Caucasian | 83.3% |
| 2009 | (Private) | 1920 | 3.39 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 86.5% |
| 2009 | FL | 1920 | 3.48 | Top 20% | Hispanic | 100.0% |
| 2009 | NJ | 1920 | 3.60 | Class Not Ranked | Other | 93.3% |
| 2009 | FL | 1920 | 3.10 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 98.6% |
| 2009 | PA | 1910 | 3.70 | Top 10% | Hispanic | 100.0% |
| 2009 | WA | 1910 | 3.48 | Top 30% | East Asian | 74.4% |
| 2009 | PA | 1910 | 3.80 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 98.0% |
| 2009 | PA | 1910 | 3.64 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 90.7% |
| 2009 | FL | 1890 | 3.51 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 95.8% |
| 2009 | CT | 1880 | 2.50 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 93.6% |
| 2009 | NJ | 1870 | 3.30 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 78.5% |
| 2009 | PA | 1870 | 3.60 | Top 5% | South Asian | 96.2% |
| 2009 | OH | 1860 | 2.80 | Class Not Ranked | African-American | 100.0% |
| 2009 | XX | 1860 | 3.44 | Unknown | South Asian | 88.0% |
| 2009 | PA | 1850 | 3.80 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 97.4% |
| 2009 | NJ | 1850 | 3.85 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 92.4% |
| 2009 | PA | 1850 | 3.90 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 97.9% |
| 2009 | PA | 1850 | 3.85 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 97.7% |
| 2009 | PA | 1840 | 3.75 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 98.5% |
| 2009 | NY | 1840 | 3.66 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 91.8% |
| 2009 | FL | 1840 | 3.00 | Top 40% | Caucasian | 83.2% |
| 2009 | PA | 1830 | 4.00 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 94.1% |
| 2009 | DE | 1830 | 4.00 | Top 1% | Caucasian | 98.7% |
| 2009 | CT | 1830 | 3.68 | Top 5% | South Asian | 96.3% |
| 2009 | PA | 1830 | 3.84 | Top 5% | Hispanic | 100.0% |
| 2009 | MD | 1820 | 3.20 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 78.6% |
| 2009 | NY | 1820 | 3.50 | Top 20% | South Asian | 83.1% |
| 2009 | PA | 1820 | 3.75 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 99.7% |
| 2009 | NY | 1820 | 3.55 | Top 10% | East Asian | 92.4% |
| 2009 | DE | 1820 | 3.97 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 98.0% |
| 2009 | (Private) | 1810 | 3.75 | Top 20% | South Asian | 89.0% |
| 2009 | FL | 1800 | 3.00 | Top 10% | Hispanic | 100.0% |
| 2009 | PA | 1800 | 4.00 | Top 1% | Caucasian | 98.5% |
| 2009 | NJ | 1790 | 2.80 | Unknown | South Asian | 59.0% |
| 2009 | NY | 1790 | 4.00 | Top 1% | East Asian | 98.5% |
| 2009 | MA | 1780 | 3.05 | Class Not Ranked | African-American | 100.0% |
| 2009 | NJ | 1780 | 3.43 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 83.5% |
| 2009 | CT | 1770 | 3.50 | Top 30% | Caucasian | 62.3% |
| 2009 | NJ | 1750 | 3.90 | Top 5% | Hispanic | 100.0% |
| 2009 | PA | 1750 | 3.70 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 92.7% |
| 2009 | XX | 1740 | 3.41 | Class Not Ranked | Middle-Eastern | 80.3% |
| 2009 | PA | 1730 | 3.50 | Top 30% | Caucasian | 95.8% |
| 2009 | NY | 1720 | 3.00 | Class Not Ranked | Hispanic | 100.0% |
| 2009 | NJ | 1720 | 3.94 | Top 20% | Other | 89.7% |
| 2009 | NY | 1710 | 3.50 | Class Not Ranked | African-American | 100.0% |
| 2009 | NY | 1700 | 3.85 | Class Not Ranked | Hispanic | 100.0% |
| 2009 | NY | 1700 | 3.64 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 93.1% |
| 2009 | NJ | 1670 | 3.20 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 55.0% |
| 2009 | MD | 1610 | 3.20 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 48.5% |
| 2009 | VA | 1590 | 3.26 | Class Not Ranked | Hispanic | 100.0% |
| 2009 | NJ | 1580 | 2.50 | Unknown | South Asian | 19.5% |
| 2009 | VA | 1580 | 3.80 | Class Not Ranked | African-American | 100.0% |
| 2009 | MD | 1560 | 3.86 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 99.6% |
| 2009 | NY | 1450 | 3.63 | Top 20% | Hispanic | 100.0% |
| 2009 | PA | 1400 | 3.70 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 73.7% |
| 2009 | VA | 1330 | 3.00 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 81.2% |
| 2009 | PA | 31 | 4.00 | Salutatorian | Caucasian | 100.0% |
| 2009 | PA | 34 | 3.90 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 99.5% |
| 2009 | PA | 33 | 3.96 | Class Not Ranked | None Indicated | 99.1% |
| 2009 | CT | 32 | 3.72 | Top 10% | East Asian | 98.6% |
| 2009 | (Private) | 32 | 3.57 | Class Not Ranked | East Asian | 97.0% |
| 2009 | OH | 31 | 4.00 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 97.8% |
| 2009 | NE | 31 | 3.84 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 96.9% |
| 2009 | TX | 30 | 3.40 | Top 30% | African-American | 100.0% |
| 2009 | NJ | 30 | 3.70 | Top 30% | Caucasian | 88.2% |
| 2009 | DC | 29 | 3.70 | Top 10% | None Indicated | 96.8% |
| 2009 | DC | 29 | 3.80 | Top 10% | Hispanic | 100.0% |
| 2009 | XX | 28 | 4.00 | Salutatorian | East Asian | 99.1% |
| 2009 | (Private) | 28 | 3.90 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 98.3% |
| 2009 | FL | 28 | 3.50 | Top 30% | Caucasian | 73.6% |
| 2009 | PA | 25 | 3.80 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 95.6% |
| 2008 | PA | 2340 | 3.70 | Top 10% | East Asian | 99.4% |
| 2008 | PA | 2340 | 4.00 | Valedictorian | East Asian | 99.9% |
| 2008 | PA | 2330 | 4.00 | Valedictorian | Caucasian | 99.9% |
| 2008 | PA | 2300 | 4.00 | Salutatorian | East Asian | 99.8% |
| 2008 | NY | 2290 | 4.00 | Valedictorian | None Indicated | 99.8% |
| 2008 | PA | 2250 | 3.85 | Top 10% | South Asian | 99.4% |
| 2008 | PA | 2220 | 3.25 | Bottom 50% | East Asian | 55.2% |
| 2008 | PA | 2220 | 4.00 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 99.2% |
| 2008 | VA | 2220 | 3.89 | Top 10% | None Indicated | 99.3% |
| 2008 | PA | 2220 | 3.94 | Top 1% | East Asian | 99.7% |
| 2008 | MA | 2210 | 3.56 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 98.5% |
| 2008 | NJ | 2210 | 3.80 | Top 5% | None Indicated | 99.4% |
| 2008 | FL | 2200 | 3.95 | Salutatorian | Caucasian | 99.7% |
| 2008 | PA | 2190 | 3.70 | Top 5% | South Asian | 99.2% |
| 2008 | PA | 2190 | 3.52 | Top 20% | East Asian | 96.1% |
| 2008 | VA | 2160 | 4.00 | Valedictorian | Caucasian | 99.7% |
| 2008 | PA | 2150 | 4.00 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 99.6% |
| 2008 | PA | 2150 | 3.98 | Valedictorian | Caucasian | 99.7% |
| 2008 | NY | 2130 | 3.85 | Unknown | East Asian | 98.8% |
| 2008 | PA | 2130 | 4.00 | Valedictorian | Caucasian | 99.7% |
| 2008 | NJ | 2120 | 3.96 | Salutatorian | None Indicated | 99.6% |
| 2008 | PA | 2110 | 3.98 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 99.1% |
| 2008 | NY | 2090 | 4.00 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 99.3% |
| 2008 | TX | 2090 | 3.55 | Top 40% | Caucasian | 76.6% |
| 2008 | PA | 2090 | 3.60 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 97.8% |
| 2008 | PA | 2090 | 3.70 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 98.2% |
| 2008 | PA | 2070 | 3.25 | Top 20% | South Asian | 91.0% |
| 2008 | PA | 2060 | 3.50 | Top 10% | African-American | 100.0% |
| 2008 | PA | 2060 | 3.90 | Top 10% | Other | 98.7% |
| 2008 | PA | 2060 | 3.70 | Top 10% | Hispanic | 100.0% |
| 2008 | MA | 2050 | 3.30 | Unknown | Hispanic | 100.0% |
| 2008 | PA | 2020 | 3.70 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 97.4% |
| 2008 | PA | 2020 | 3.40 | Unknown | None Indicated | 94.3% |
| 2008 | NJ | 2020 | 3.80 | Top 10% | South Asian | 98.1% |
| 2008 | NY | 2020 | 3.70 | Top 10% | Hispanic | 100.0% |
| 2008 | NJ | 2020 | 4.00 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 98.8% |
| 2008 | PA | 2010 | 3.94 | Salutatorian | African-American | 100.0% |
| 2008 | PA | 2010 | 4.00 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 98.8% |
| 2008 | PA | 2010 | 4.00 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 98.8% |
| 2008 | CA | 1980 | 3.67 | Valedictorian | Caucasian | 98.7% |
| 2008 | CT | 1980 | 3.55 | Unknown | Caucasian | 94.1% |
| 2008 | PA | 1980 | 4.00 | Salutatorian | Caucasian | 99.4% |
| 2008 | PA | 1980 | 3.90 | Top 5% | Hispanic | 100.0% |
| 2008 | NJ | 1950 | 3.60 | Top 30% | Caucasian | 88.5% |
| 2008 | VA | 1950 | 3.63 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 97.5% |
| 2008 | NY | 1950 | 3.58 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 90.9% |
| 2008 | MA | 1930 | 3.03 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 71.5% |
| 2008 | OH | 1920 | 3.53 | Unknown | Caucasian | 92.2% |
| 2008 | MD | 1910 | 3.50 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 87.5% |
| 2008 | CA | 1910 | 3.40 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 84.7% |
| 2008 | MD | 1900 | 3.10 | Unknown | Caucasian | 79.7% |
| 2008 | NJ | 1880 | 3.75 | Unknown | Other | 94.3% |
| 2008 | OH | 1860 | 3.39 | Top 30% | Caucasian | 65.4% |
| 2008 | NY | 1860 | 3.50 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 84.8% |
| 2008 | MA | 1860 | 3.99 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 97.6% |
| 2008 | NJ | 1840 | 3.80 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 91.2% |
| 2008 | MD | 1830 | 3.74 | Class Not Ranked | South Asian | 92.9% |
| 2008 | NJ | 1820 | 3.70 | Unknown | Caucasian | 92.0% |
| 2008 | (Private) | 1810 | 3.72 | Top 20% | East Asian | 88.3% |
| 2008 | MD | 1810 | 3.65 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 86.4% |
| 2008 | MD | 1780 | 3.50 | Top 20% | African-American | 100.0% |
| 2008 | SC | 1750 | 3.90 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 96.8% |
| 2008 | FL | 1740 | 3.65 | Unknown | Other | 87.7% |
| 2008 | NJ | 1730 | 3.54 | Unknown | Hispanic | 100.0% |
| 2008 | NJ | 1700 | 2.90 | Unknown | South Asian | 51.0% |
| 2008 | NJ | 1580 | 2.56 | Unknown | None Indicated | 21.8% |
| 2008 | PA | 1510 | 3.70 | Bottom 50% | Other | 13.9% |
| 2008 | OH | 1250 | 4.00 | Valedictorian | Caucasian | 99.6% |
| 2008 | (Private) | 33 | 3.94 | Top 5% | None Indicated | 99.6% |
| 2008 | MI | 32 | 3.60 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 98.1% |
| 2008 | FL | 28 | 3.70 | Top 5% | None Indicated | 97.3% |
| 2008 | PA | 28 | 3.50 | Unknown | Caucasian | 90.6% |
| 2007 | PA | 2220 | 4.00 | Top 1% | East Asian | 99.8% |
| 2007 | NJ | 2140 | 3.55 | Unknown | South Asian | 97.0% |
| 2007 | PA | 2120 | 3.89 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 99.3% |
| 2007 | NJ | 2100 | 3.68 | Class Not Ranked | East Asian | 97.3% |
| 2007 | NY | 2000 | 3.80 | Top 20% | Hispanic | 100.0% |
| 2007 | PA | 2000 | 3.50 | Unknown | East Asian | 94.0% |
| 2007 | NJ | 1890 | 3.60 | Unknown | Middle-Eastern | 92.4% |
| 2007 | XX | 1850 | 3.80 | Unknown | East Asian | 94.3% |
| 2007 | PA | 1820 | 3.70 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 96.3% |
| 2007 | GA | 1810 | 3.60 | Unknown | Caucasian | 89.6% |
| 2007 | FL | 1700 | 2.60 | Unknown | Caucasian | 34.0% |
| 2007 | NY | 1670 | 3.97 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 96.3% |
| 2007 | FL | 31 | 3.53 | Unknown | East Asian | 95.8% |
| 2006 | NY | 2180 | 3.87 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 99.2% |
| 2006 | VA | 2020 | 3.90 | Top 5% | Caucasian | 99.0% |
| 2005 | VA | 1790 | 3.40 | Class Not Ranked | Hispanic | 100.0% |
| 2005 | CT | 1310 | 3.50 | Unknown | None Indicated | 93.0% |
| 2005 | NJ | 1250 | 3.70 | Top 30% | None Indicated | 80.6% |
|
|
|
| 2010 | NY | 1690 | 3.40 | Unknown | Caucasian | 76.1% |
| 2009 | PA | 2060 | 2.70 | Bottom 40% | Caucasian | 55.0% |
| 2009 | CA | 2040 | 2.50 | Class Not Ranked | South Asian | 66.9% |
| 2009 | NJ | 1930 | 3.10 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 81.7% |
| 2009 | PA | 1880 | 3.70 | Top 20% | Caucasian | 90.7% |
| 2009 | NY | 1850 | 3.64 | Top 30% | South Asian | 76.5% |
| 2009 | PA | 1850 | 2.90 | Unknown | South Asian | 66.6% |
| 2009 | NJ | 1810 | 3.40 | Top 30% | Caucasian | 60.8% |
| 2009 | NY | 1800 | 3.10 | Top 30% | Caucasian | 42.4% |
| 2009 | NJ | 1800 | 3.40 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 83.8% |
| 2009 | PA | 1770 | 3.78 | Top 10% | Caucasian | 94.4% |
| 2009 | CT | 1710 | 3.25 | Top 40% | Caucasian | 23.6% |
| 2009 | SC | 1700 | 3.12 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 63.6% |
| 2009 | MD | 1700 | 3.43 | Top 30% | East Asian | 51.0% |
| 2009 | NY | 1670 | 3.10 | Class Not Ranked | Caucasian | 59.4% |
| 2009 | NJ | 1670 | 3.09 | Class Not Ranked | South Asian | 58.8% |
| 2009 | PA | 1660 | 3.80 | Top 40% | Caucasian | 47.4% |
| 2009 | MA | 1610 | 3.60 | Top 30% | Caucasian | 51.2% |
| 2009 | PA | 1560 | 3.30 | Top 40% | Caucasian | 15.4% |
| 2009 | PA | 1520 | 3.54 | Top 40% | Caucasian | 21.2% |
| 2009 | NJ | 1490 | 3.23 | Class Not Ranked | South Asian | 47.6% |
| 2009 | NJ | 28 | 3.00 | Top 40% | Caucasian | 27.3% |
| 2008 | NJ | 2070 | 3.50 | Unknown | None Indicated | 95.5% |
| 2008 | NJ | 1980 | 3.15 | Top 30% | Caucasian | 64.4% |
| 2008 | NJ | 1980 | 3.00 | Unknown | Caucasian | 81.5% |
| 2008 | NJ | 1860 | 3.19 | Unknown | South Asian | 82.4% |
| 2008 | (Private) | 1850 | 3.65 | Top 30% | Caucasian | 77.0% |
| 2008 | NJ | 1730 | 3.76 | Top 30% | Other | 72.0% |
| 2008 | PA | 1720 | 3.40 | Top 30% | Caucasian | 58.3% |
| 2008 | NJ | 1710 | 3.40 | Top 20% | South Asian | 69.8% |
| 2008 | NY | 1710 | 3.08 | Bottom 50% | East Asian | 8.3% |
| 2007 | CA | 1720 | 3.70 | Top 10% | None Indicated | 91.8% |
| |